Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-24497
AIMCO Properties, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 84-1275621 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100 | ||
Denver, Colorado | 80237 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code:(303) 757-8101
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
Not applicable | Not applicable |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Partnership Common Units
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yeso Noþ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filero | Accelerated filerþ | Non-accelerated filero(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting companyo |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yeso Noþ
As of February 25, 2009, there were 124,296,393 Partnership Common Units outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of Apartment Investment and Management Company’s definitive proxy statement to be issued in conjunction with Apartment Investment and Management Company’s annual meeting of stockholders to be held April 27, 2009, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report.
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
Item | Page | |||||||
2 | ||||||||
9 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
40 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
43 | ||||||||
43 | ||||||||
44 | ||||||||
Exhibit 21.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 23.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 99.1 |
1
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. Certain information included in this Annual Report contains or may contain information that is forward-looking, including, without limitation, statements regarding the effect of acquisitions and redevelopments, our future financial performance, including our ability to maintain current or meet projected occupancy, rent levels and same store results, and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of risks and factors, some of which are beyond our control, including, without limitation: financing risks, including the availability and cost of financing and the risk that our cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; earnings may not be sufficient to maintain compliance with debt covenants; national and local economic conditions; energy costs; the terms of governmental regulations that affect us and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which we operate; real estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and the general economic climate in the markets in which we operate and competition for tenants in such markets; insurance risk; acquisition and development risks, including failure of such acquisitions to perform in accordance with projections; the timing of acquisitions and dispositions; natural disasters and severe weather such as hurricanes; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or previously owned by us. In addition, Aimco’s current and continuing qualification as a real estate investment trust involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and depends on our ability to meet the various requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, through actual operating results, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership. Readers should carefully review our financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the section entitled “Risk Factors” described in Item 1A of this Annual Report and the other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
PART I
Item 1.Business
The Partnership
AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, or the Partnership, and together with its consolidated subsidiaries was formed on May 16, 1994, to engage in the acquisition, ownership, management and redevelopment of apartment properties. Our securities include Partnership Common Units, or common OP Units, Partnership Preferred Units, or preferred OP Units, and High Performance Partnership Units, or High Performance Units, which are collectively referred to as OP Units. Apartment Investment and Management Company, or Aimco, is the owner of our general partner, AIMCO-GP, Inc., or the General Partner, and special limited partner, AIMCO-LP Trust, or the Special Limited Partner. The General Partner and Special Limited Partner hold common OP Units and are the primary holders of outstanding preferred OP Units. Limited Partners refers to individuals or entities that are our limited partners, other than Aimco, the General Partner or the Special Limited Partner, and own common OP Units or preferred OP Units. Generally, after holding the common OP Units for one year, the Limited Partners have the right to redeem their common OP Units for cash, subject to our prior right to acquire some or all of the common OP Units tendered for redemption in exchange for shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. Common OP Units redeemed for Aimco Class A Common Stock are generally exchanged on a one-for-one basis (subject to antidilution adjustments). Preferred OP Units and High Performance Units may or may not be redeemable based on their respective terms, as provided for in the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties, L.P. as amended, or the Partnership Agreement.
We, through our operating divisions and subsidiaries, hold substantially all of Aimco’s assets and manage the daily operations of Aimco’s business and assets. Aimco is required to contribute all proceeds from offerings of its securities to us. In addition, substantially all of Aimco’s assets must be owned through the Partnership; therefore, Aimco is generally required to contribute all assets acquired to us. In exchange for the contribution of offering proceeds or assets, Aimco receives additional interests in us with similar terms (e.g., if Aimco contributes proceeds of a preferred stock offering, Aimco (through the General Partner and Special Limited Partner) receives preferred OP Units with terms substantially similar to the preferred securities issued by Aimco).
2
Table of Contents
Aimco frequently consummates transactions for our benefit. For legal, tax or other business reasons, Aimco may hold title or ownership of certain assets until they can be transferred to us. However, we have a controlling financial interest in substantially all of Aimco’s assets in the process of transfer to us.
As of December 31, 2008, we owned or managed a real estate portfolio of 992 apartment properties containing 162,807 apartment units located in 44 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Our portfolio includes garden style, mid-rise and high-rise properties.
We own an equity interest in, and consolidate the majority of, the properties in our owned real estate portfolio. These properties represent the consolidated real estate holdings in our financial statements, which we refer to as consolidated properties. In addition, we have an equity interest in, but do not consolidate for financial statement purposes, certain properties that are accounted for under the equity or cost methods. These properties represent our investment in unconsolidated real estate partnerships in our financial statements, which we refer to as unconsolidated properties. Additionally, we provide property management and asset management services to certain properties, and in certain cases, we may indirectly own generally less than one percent of the operations of such properties through a partnership syndication or other fund. Our equity holdings and managed properties are as follows as of December 31, 2008:
Total Portfolio | ||||||||
Properties | Units | |||||||
Consolidated properties | 514 | 117,719 | ||||||
Unconsolidated properties | 85 | 9,613 | ||||||
Property management | 34 | 3,252 | ||||||
Asset management | 359 | 32,223 | ||||||
Total | 992 | 162,807 | ||||||
At December 31, 2008, we had outstanding 108,315,704 common OP Units, 28,164,846 preferred OP Units and 2,344,719 High Performance Units (see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8).
Since Aimco’s initial public offering in July 1994, we have completed numerous transactions, including purchases of properties and interests in entities that own or manage properties, expanding our portfolio of owned or managed properties from 132 properties with 29,343 apartment units to a peak of over 2,100 properties with 379,000 apartment units. As of December 31, 2008, our portfolio of owned and/or managed properties consists of 992 properties with 162,807 apartment units.
Except as the context otherwise requires, “we,” “our” and “us” refer to the Partnership and the Partnership’s consolidated entities, collectively. Except as the context otherwise requires, “Aimco” refers to Aimco and Aimco’s consolidated entities, collectively. As used herein, and except where the context otherwise requires, “partnership” refers to a limited partnership or a limited liability company and “partner” refers to a limited partner in a limited partnership or a member in a limited liability company.
Available Information
We do not maintain a website; however, Aimco does, and it makes all of its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable through its website atwww.aimco.com. The information contained on Aimco’s website is not incorporated into this Annual Report. We will furnish copies of the Partnership’s filings free of charge upon written request to Aimco’s corporate secretary.
Any materials we file with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
Financial Information About Industry Segments
We operate in two reportable segments: real estate (owning, operating and redeveloping apartments) and investment management (portfolio strategy, capital allocation, joint ventures, tax credit syndication, acquisitions, dispositions and other transaction activities). For further information on these segments, see Note 18 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis in Item 7.
Business Overview
Our principal financial objective is to increase long-term OP unitholder value per unit, as measured by Economic Income, which consists of cash distributions and changes in Net Asset Value, or NAV, which is the estimated fair value of our assets, net of debt.
3
Table of Contents
We strive to meet our objectives through:
• | property operations — using scale and technology to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of attracting and retaining apartment residents; |
• | portfolio management — allocating capital among geographic markets and apartment property types such as Class A, Class B and Class C with redevelopment potential; |
• | redevelopment of properties — making substantial upgrades to the physical plant and, sometimes, to the services offered to residents; |
• | earning fee income from providing investment management services such as property management, financial management, accounting, investor reporting, property debt financings, tax credit syndication, redevelopment and construction management; |
• | managing our cost and risk of capital by using leverage that is largely long-term, laddered in maturity, non-recourse and property specific; and |
• | reducing our general and administrative and certain other costs consistent with the reduced size of our portfolio. |
Our business is organized around three core activities: Property Operations, Redevelopment, and Investment Management. These three core activities, along with our financial strategy, are described in more detail below.
Property Operations
Our portfolio is comprised of two business components: conventional and affordable. Our conventional operations, which are market-rate apartments with rents paid by the resident, include 310 properties with 93,444 units. Our affordable operations consist of 289 properties with 33,888 units, with rents that are generally paid, in whole or part, by a government agency. Affordable properties tend to have relatively more stable rents and higher occupancy due to government rent payments and thus are much less affected by market fluctuations.
We operate a broad range of property types, from suburban garden-style to urban high-rise properties in 44 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico at a broad range of average monthly rental rates, with most between $700 and $1,200 per month, and reaching as high as $10,000 per month at some of our premier properties. This diversification insulates us, to some degree, from inevitable downturns in any one market.
Our property operations currently are organized into five areas, which are further subdivided according to our target markets, which are the largest 20 U.S. markets as measured by total market capitalization, or the total market value of institutional-grade apartment properties in a particular market. To manage our nationwide portfolio more efficiently and to increase the benefits from our local management expertise, we have given direct responsibility for operations within each area to an Area Vice President, or AVP, with regular senior management reviews. To enable the AVPs to focus on sales and service, as well as to improve financial control and budgeting, we have dedicated an area financial officer to support each AVP, and with the exception of routine maintenance, our specialized Construction Services group manages all on-site improvements, thus reducing the need for AVPs to spend time on oversight of construction projects.
We seek to improve our corporate-level oversight of property operations by developing better systems, standardizing business goals, operational measurements and internal reporting, and enhancing financial controls over field operations. Our objectives are to focus on the areas discussed below:
• | Customer Service.Our operating culture is focused on our residents. Our goal is to provide our residents with consistent service in clean, safe and attractive communities. We evaluate our performance through a customer satisfaction tracking system. In addition, we emphasize the quality of our on-site employees through recruiting, training and retention programs, which we believe contributes to improved customer service and leads to increased occupancy rates and enhanced operational performance. |
• | Resident Selection and Retention.In apartment properties, neighbors are a meaningful part of the product, together with the location of the property and the physical quality of the apartment units. Part of our property operations strategy is to focus on resident acquisition and retention — attracting and retaining credit-worthy residents who are good neighbors. We have structured goals and coaching for all of our sales personnel, a tracking system for inquiries and a standardized renewal communication program. We have standardized residential financial stability requirements and have policies and monitoring practices to maintain our resident quality. |
4
Table of Contents
• | Revenue Management.For our conventional properties, we are focusing on people, processes and technology to build a revenue management model that is competitive with the best in our industry. We seek to increase revenue by optimizing the balance between rental and occupancy rates. We are also focused on the automation of on-site operations, as we believe that timely and accurate collection of property performance and resident profile data will enable us to maximize revenue through better property management and leasing decisions. We have standardized policies for new and renewal pricing with timely data and analyses by floor-plan, thereby enabling us to maximize our ability to modify pricing, even in challenging sub-markets. During 2008, we established a centralized revenue management team with leaders from the airline, hospitality and property management industries, and centralized our rental rate pricing function in partnership with our area portfolio management teams. |
• | Controlling Expenses.Cost controls are accomplished by local focus at the area level and by taking advantage of economies of scale at the corporate level. As a result of the size of our portfolio and our area concentrations of properties, we have the ability to spread over a large property base fixed costs for general and administrative expenditures and certain operating functions, such as purchasing, insurance and information technology. |
• | Ancillary Services.We believe that our ownership and management of properties provide us with unique access to a customer base that allows us to provide additional services and thereby increase occupancy and rents, while also generating incremental revenue. We currently provide cable television, telephone services, appliance rental, and carport, garage and storage space rental at certain properties. |
Capital Replacements and Capital Improvements
We believe that the physical condition and amenities of our apartment properties are important factors in our ability to maintain and increase rental rates. In 2008, we spent $101.4 million (our share), or $799 per owned apartment unit, for Capital Replacements, which represent the share of expenditures that are deemed to replace the consumed portion of acquired capital assets. Additionally, we spent $124.9 million (our share), or $985 per owned apartment unit, for Capital Improvements, which are non-redevelopment capital expenditures that are made to enhance the value, profitability or useful life of an asset from its original purchase condition.
Redevelopment
In addition to maintenance and improvements of our properties, we focus on the redevelopment of certain properties each year. We believe redevelopment of certain properties in superior locations provides advantages over ground-up development, enabling us to generate rents comparable to new properties with lower financial risk, in less time and with reduced delays associated with governmental permits and authorizations. Redevelopment work also includes seeking entitlements from local governments, which enhance the value of our existing portfolio by increasing density, that is, the right to add residential units to a site. We have historically undertaken a range of redevelopment projects: from those in which a substantial number of all available units are vacated for significant renovations to the property, to those in which there is significant renovation, such as exteriors, common areas or unit improvements, typically done upon lease expirations without the need to vacate units on any wholesale or substantial basis. We have a specialized Redevelopment and Construction Services group, which includes developers, engineers, architects and construction managers, to oversee these projects.
Our share of 2008 redevelopment expenditures on active and completed projects totaled $226.3 million and $113.9 million in conventional and affordable redevelopment projects, respectively. During 2008, we completed redevelopment projects at 13 conventional properties and 21 affordable properties with 6,524 and 2,903 units, respectively. During 2008, we delivered 4,817 conventional and 1,780 affordable redeveloped units, respectively, some of which are part of redevelopment projects completed in 2008 and some of which are part of ongoing projects. As of December 31, 2008, we had 37 conventional and four affordable redevelopment projects at various stages of completion.
In 2009, we expect to decrease our redevelopment expenditures, with an investment between $50.0 and $75.0 million in conventional redevelopment projects and between $30.0 and $45.0 million in affordable redevelopment projects, predominantly funded by third-party tax credit equity.
5
Table of Contents
Investment Management
Investment management includes activities related to our owned portfolio of properties as well as services provided to affiliated partnerships. Activities and services that fall within Investment Management include portfolio strategy, capital allocation, joint ventures, tax credit syndication, acquisitions, dispositions and other transaction activities. Within our owned portfolio, we refer to these activities as “Portfolio Management” and they include strategic portfolio and capital allocation decisions through transactions to buy, sell or modify our ownership interest in properties, including through the use of partnerships and joint ventures. The purpose of these transactions is to adjust our investments to reflect our decisions regarding target allocations to geographic markets and to investment types. When we provide these services with respect to our own investments, there is no separate compensation and their benefit is seen in property operating results and in investment gains. For affiliated partnerships, we refer to these activities as “Asset Management,” and they include property management, financial management, accounting, investor reporting, property debt financings, tax credit syndication, redevelopment and construction management. When we provide these services to affiliated partnerships, we are separately compensated through fees paid by third party investors. Those fees may be recognized in a subsequent period upon the occurrence of a current transaction or a transaction expected to close within twelve months, or improvement in operations that generates sufficient cash to pay the fees. Although many teams at Aimco are involved in the delivery of these services, the negotiation of transactions for Aimco’s account and the oversight of services provided to others is primarily the responsibility of our Investment Management team.
Conventional Portfolio Management
Portfolio management involves the ongoing allocation of investment capital to meet our geographic and product type goals. We target geographic balance in Aimco’s diversified portfolio in order to optimize risk-adjusted returns and to avoid the risk of undue concentration in any particular market. We also seek to balance the portfolio by product type, with both high quality properties in excellent locations and also high land value properties that support redevelopment activities.
During 2007, we refined our geographic allocation strategy to focus on our target markets. We believe these markets to be deep, relatively liquid and to possess desirable long-term growth characteristics. They are primarily coastal markets, and also include a number of Sun Belt cities and Chicago, Illinois. We may also invest in other markets on an opportunistic basis. Following this strategy through dispositions, acquisitions and redevelopment spending, we have reduced our investment in markets outside our target markets and increased our investment in our target markets. We expect that increased geographic focus will also add to our investment knowledge and increase operating efficiencies based on local economies of scale.
Portfolio management also includes dispositions of properties located within markets we intend to exit, properties in less favored locations within our target markets and properties that do not meet our long-term investment criteria. Property sales proceeds are used to fund redevelopment spending, acquisitions, and other corporate purposes, such as debt reduction, preferred unit redemptions or purchases and special distributions. In 2008, we sold 130 conventional properties generating net cash proceeds to us, after repayment of existing debt, payment of transaction costs and distributions to limited partners, of $852.2 million. In 2008, we exited six markets, and as of December 31, 2008, our conventional portfolio included 310 properties with 93,444 units in 40 markets.
As of December 31, 2008, conventional properties in our target markets comprised 84.2% of our Net Asset Value (which is the estimated fair value of our assets, net of debt, or NAV) attributable to our conventional properties. Our top five markets by NOI contribution include the metropolitan areas of Washington, D.C.; Los Angeles, California; “Other” Florida (which is comprised of Ft. Lauderdale, Jacksonville, Orlando, Palm Beach County and Tampa); Chicago, Illinois and Boston, Massachusetts.
During 2008, we invested in our conventional portfolio primarily by funding redevelopment. In 2008, we invested $226.3 million in redevelopment of properties in our conventional portfolio. We also completed acquisitions of three conventional properties, containing approximately 470 residential units for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $111.5 million (excluding transaction costs). These properties are located in San Jose, California, Brighton, Massachusetts and Seattle, Washington.
Portfolio management can include the use of partnerships and joint ventures to allow us to attract and serve high quality investment partners, and to rebalance efficiently our geographic market allocation of capital while maintaining our local operating platform and its operational scale.
6
Table of Contents
Affordable Portfolio Management
The portfolio management strategy for our affordable portfolio is similar to that for our conventional portfolio. During 2008, we invested $113.9 million in redevelopment of affordable properties, funded primarily by proceeds from the sale of tax credits to institutional partners. As with conventional properties, we also seek to dispose of properties that are inconsistent with our long-term investment and operating strategies. During 2008, we sold 25 properties from our affordable portfolio, including six unconsolidated properties, generating net cash proceeds to us, after repayment of existing debt, payment of transaction costs and distributions to limited partners, of $169.8 million. As of December 31, 2008, our affordable portfolio included 289 properties with 33,888 units.
Financial Strategy
We are focused on improving liquidity and balancing our sources and uses of cash. During 2008, using proceeds from asset dispositions, we repaid in full our $75.0 million term loan which was scheduled for payment in September 2009, repaid all of the outstanding amounts due on our revolving credit facility and repurchased approximately $27.0 million of outstanding variable rate preferred OP Units. Also during 2008, in connection with property dispositions, we repaid approximately $1.1 billion in non-recourse property debt. As of December 31, 2008, the amount available under our revolving credit facility, which matures in May 2010 (inclusive of a one-year extension option we expect to exercise) was $578.8 million (after giving effect to $56.2 million outstanding for undrawn letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facility). Additionally, we had $72.0 million of available capacity on our $200.0 million non-recourse secured credit facility which, inclusive of two one-year extension options, matures in October 2012. During 2009, we intend to use proceeds from asset dispositions to continue to reduce the remaining balance on our term loan, which matures in March 2011. That term loan has an outstanding balance of $350.0 million after we repaid $50.0 million in January 2009. Other than the term loan and any borrowings under the revolving credit facility, we have no recourse corporate debt.
Our revolving credit facility includes customary financial covenants, including the maintenance of specified ratios with respect to total indebtedness to gross asset value, total secured indebtedness to gross asset value, aggregate recourse indebtedness to gross asset value, variable rate debt to total indebtedness, debt service coverage and fixed charge coverage; the maintenance of a minimum adjusted tangible net worth; and limitations regarding the amount of cross-collateralized debt. The credit facility includes other customary covenants, including a restriction on distributions and other restricted payments, but permits distributions during any four consecutive fiscal quarters in an aggregate amount of up to 95% of our funds from operations for such period, subject to certain non-cash adjustments, or such amount as may be necessary to maintain our REIT status. These covenants are calculated on a quarterly basis and are monitored as various strategic decisions are considered. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of December 31, 2008.
We are also focused on minimizing our cost of capital on a risk-adjusted basis. We primarily use non-recourse property debt with laddered maturities and minimize reliance on corporate debt. The lower risk inherent in non-recourse property debt permits us to operate with higher debt leverage and a lower weighted average cost of capital. We use floating rate property and corporate debt to provide lower interest costs over time at a level that considers acceptable earnings volatility. During 2008, we closed property loans totaling $962.2 million at an average interest rate of 5.51%, which included the refinancing of property loans totaling $472.9 million with prior interest rates averaging 5.58%. In addition to the refinancing activity, the property loans included new financings on existing properties, redevelopment loans and the modification of terms on existing property debt. In 2009, 2010 and 2011, 38 property loans will mature and our share of these maturities totals $273.9 million, $279.9 million and $102.3 million, respectively. We expect to refinance a number of such loans in the first half of 2009.
Competition
In attracting and retaining residents to occupy our properties we compete with numerous other housing alternatives. Our properties compete directly with other rental apartments as well as condominiums and single-family homes that are available for rent or purchase in the markets in which our properties are located. Principal factors of competition include rent or price charged, attractiveness of the location and property and quality and breadth of services. The number of competitive properties relative to demand in a particular area has a material effect on our ability to lease apartment units at our properties and on the rents we charge. In certain markets there exists oversupply of single family homes and condominiums and household consolidation, both of which affect the pricing and occupancy of our rental apartments. Additionally, we compete with other real estate investors, including other apartment REITs, pension and investment funds, partnerships and investment companies in acquiring, redeveloping and managing apartment properties. This competition affects our ability to acquire properties we want to add to our portfolio and the price that we pay in such acquisitions.
7
Table of Contents
Taxation
We are treated as a “pass-through” entity for United States Federal income tax purposes and are not subject to United States Federal income taxation. Each of our partners, however, is subject to tax on his allocable share of partnership tax items, including partnership income, gains, losses, deductions and credits, or Partnership Tax Items, for each taxable year during which he is a partner, regardless of whether he receives any actual distributions of cash or other property from us during the taxable year. Generally, the characterization of any particular Partnership Tax Item is determined by us, rather than at the partner level, and the amount of a partner’s allocable share of such item is governed by the terms of the Partnership Agreement. The General Partner is our “tax matters partner” for United States Federal income tax purposes. The tax matters partner is authorized, but not required, to take certain actions on behalf of us with respect to tax matters.
Taxation of Aimco
Aimco has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1994, and intends to continue to operate in such a manner. Aimco’s current and continuing qualification as a REIT depends on its ability to meet the various requirements imposed by the Code, which relate to organizational structure, distribution levels, diversity of stock ownership and certain restrictions with regard to owned assets and categories of income. If Aimco qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it will generally not be subject to United States Federal corporate income tax on its taxable income that is currently distributed to stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” (at the corporate and stockholder levels) that generally results from an investment in a corporation.
Even if Aimco qualifies as a REIT, it may be subject to United States Federal income and excise taxes in various situations, such as on its undistributed income. Aimco also will be required to pay a 100% tax on any net income on non-arm’s length transactions between it and a TRS (described below) and on any net income from sales of property that was property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course. Aimco and its stockholders may be subject to state or local taxation in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which Aimco transacts business or Aimco’s stockholders reside. In addition, Aimco could also be subject to the alternative minimum tax, or AMT, on its items of tax preference. The state and local tax laws may not conform to the United States Federal income tax treatment. Any taxes imposed on Aimco reduce its and our operating cash flow and net income.
Certain of Aimco’s operations (property management, asset management, risk, etc.) are conducted through taxable REIT subsidiaries, each of which we refer to as a TRS. A TRS is a C-corporation that has not elected REIT status and, as such, is subject to United States Federal corporate income tax. Aimco uses TRS entities to facilitate its ability to offer certain services and activities to its residents and investment partners, as these services and activities generally cannot be offered directly by the REIT.
Regulation
General
Apartment properties and their owners are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including those related to real estate broker licensing and regulations relating to recreational facilities such as swimming pools, activity centers and other common areas. Changes in laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on properties or increasing the restrictions on discharges or other conditions, as well as changes in laws affecting development, construction and safety requirements, may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, which would adversely affect our net income and cash flows from operating activities. In addition, future enactment of rent control or rent stabilization laws, such as legislation that has been considered in New York, or other laws regulating multifamily housing may reduce rental revenue or increase operating costs in particular markets.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of properties, we could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with our properties or properties we acquire or manage in the future. These and other risks related to environmental matters are described in more detail in Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”
8
Table of Contents
Insurance
Our primary lines of insurance coverage are property, general liability, and workers’ compensation. We believe that our insurance coverages adequately insure our properties against the risk of loss attributable to fire, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood, terrorism and other perils, and adequately insure us against other risk. Our coverage includes deductibles, retentions and limits that are customary in the industry. We have established loss prevention, loss mitigation, claims handling, litigation management and loss reserving procedures to manage our exposure.
Employees
At December 31, 2008, we had approximately 4,500 employees, of which approximately 3,400 were at the property level, performing various on-site functions, with the balance managing corporate and area operations, including investment and debt transactions, legal, financial reporting, accounting, information systems, human resources and other support functions. Unions represent approximately 120 of our employees. We have never experienced a work stoppage and believe we maintain satisfactory relations with our employees.
As further described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8, we initiated an organizational restructuring during 2008. As a result of the restructuring, we plan to eliminate approximately 300 jobs on or before March 1, 2009, with reductions in staffing within corporate, redevelopment and construction services, property management and investment management functions. Approximately half of the planned job eliminations had been completed at December 31, 2008.
Item 1A.Risk Factors
The risk factors noted in this section and other factors noted throughout this Annual Report, describe certain risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
Our existing and future debt financing could render us unable to operate, result in foreclosure on our properties, prevent us from making distributions on our equity or otherwise adversely affect our liquidity.
We are subject to the risk that our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest, and the risk that existing indebtedness may not be refinanced or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness. If we fail to make required payments of principal and interest on secured debt, our lenders could foreclose on the properties and other collateral securing such debt, which would result in loss of income and asset value to us. As of December 31, 2008, substantially all of the properties that we owned or controlled were encumbered by debt. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of debt that we may incur, and we have significant amounts of debt outstanding. Payments of principal and interest may leave us with insufficient cash resources to operate our properties or pay distributions required to be paid in order to maintain Aimco’s qualification as a REIT.
Our strategy is generally to incur debt to increase the return on our capital while maintaining acceptable coverage ratios. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we had a ratio of free cash flow (net operating income less spending for capital replacements) to combined interest expense and preferred OP Unit distributions of 1.43:1. For the year ended December 31, 2008, as calculated based on the provisions in our credit agreement, which is further discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8, we had a ratio of earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization to debt service of 1.63:1 and a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 1.43:1.
At December 31, 2008, we had swap positions with two financial institutions totaling $422.1 million. The related swap agreements provide for collateral calls to maintain specified loan-to-value ratios. In the event the values of the real estate properties serving as collateral under these agreements decline, we may be required to provide additional collateral pursuant to the swap agreements, which would adversely affect our cash flows.
Disruptions in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain financing and the cost of available financing and could adversely affect our liquidity.
Our ability to obtain financing and the cost of such financing depends on the overall condition of the United States credit markets and the level of involvement of certain government sponsored entities, specifically, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie Mac, and Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae, in secondary credit markets. Recently, the United States credit markets have experienced significant liquidity disruptions which have caused the spreads on debt financings to widen considerably and have made obtaining financing, both non-recourse property debt and corporate borrowings, such as our term loan or revolving credit facility, more difficult.
9
Table of Contents
Further or prolonged disruptions in the credit markets could result in Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae reducing their level of involvement in secondary credits markets which would adversely affect our ability to obtain non-recourse property debt financing. Additionally, further or prolonged disruptions in the credit markets could lead to the failure of additional financial companies, some of which may have financial commitments within our revolving credit facility. This may affect our access to liquidity through our credit facility’s scheduled maturity in May 2010 (inclusive of a one year extension option we expect to exercise). When the revolving credit facility matures, disruptions in the credit markets may also affect our ability to renew such credit facility with similar commitments.
If our ability to obtain financing is adversely affected, we may be unable to satisfy scheduled maturities on existing financing through other sources of liquidity, which could result in lender foreclosure on the properties securing such debt and loss of income and asset value , each of which would adversely affect our liquidity.
Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense and reduce our profitability.
As of December 31, 2008, we had approximately $1,309.5 million of variable-rate indebtedness outstanding and $73.0 million of variable rate preferred OP Units outstanding. Of the total debt subject to variable interest rates, floating rate tax-exempt bond financing was $563.4 million. Floating rate tax-exempt bond financing is benchmarked against the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index, or SIFMA, rate (previously the Bond Market Association index), which since 1989 has averaged 69% of the 30-day LIBOR rate. If this historical relationship continues, we estimate that an increase in 30-day LIBOR of 1.0% (0.69% in tax-exempt interest rates) with constant credit risk spreads would result in our income before minority interests being reduced by $11.6 million and our income attributable to common unitholders being reduced by $12.0 million on an annual basis. At December 31, 2008, we had approximately $717.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and notes receivable, the majority of which bear interest. We also had approximately $127.3 million of variable rate debt associated with our redevelopment activities, for which we capitalize a portion of the interest expense. The effect of our interest bearing assets and of capitalizing interest on variable rate debt associated with our redevelopment activities would partially reduce the effect of an increase in variable interest rates. Considering these offsets, the same increase in 30-day LIBOR would result in our income before minority interests being reduced by $3.1 million and our income attributable to common unitholders being reduced by $4.6 million on an annual basis.
Failure to generate sufficient net operating income may limit our ability to fund necessary capital expenditures, or adversely affect our ability to pay distributions.
Our ability to fund necessary capital expenditures on our properties depends on our ability to generate net operating income in excess of required debt payments. If we are unable to fund capital expenditures on our properties, we may not be able to preserve the competitiveness of our properties, which could adversely affect our net operating income.
Our ability to make payments to our investors depends on our ability to generate net operating income in excess of required debt payments and capital expenditure requirements. Our net operating income and liquidity may be adversely affected by events or conditions beyond our control, including:
• | the general economic climate; |
• | competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; |
• | local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments, that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; |
• | changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; |
• | increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; |
• | changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multifamily housing; and |
• | changes in interest rates and the availability of financing. |
10
Table of Contents
Covenant restrictions may limit our ability to make payments to our investors.
Some of our debt and other securities contain covenants that restrict our ability to make distributions or other payments to our investors unless certain financial tests or other criteria are satisfied. Our credit facility provides, among other things, that we may make distributions to our investors during any four consecutive fiscal quarters in an aggregate amount that does not exceed the greater of 95% of our Funds From Operations for such period, subject to certain non-cash adjustments, or such amount as may be necessary to maintain Aimco’s REIT status. Our outstanding classes of preferred OP Units prohibit the payment of distributions on our common OP Units if we fail to pay the distributions to which the holders of the preferred OP Units are entitled.
Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, we may not be able to sell properties when appropriate.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and cannot always be sold quickly. Our freedom to sell properties is also restricted by REIT tax rules applicable to Aimco. Thus, we may not be able to change our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other market conditions. We also intend to use proceeds from property sales to repay our corporate debt. Our ability to dispose of assets in the future will depend on prevailing economic and market conditions, including the cost and availability of financing. This could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Competition could limit our ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rents.
Our apartment properties compete for residents with other housing alternatives, including other rental apartments, condominiums and single-family homes that are available for rent, as well as new and existing condominiums and single-family homes for sale. Competitive residential housing in a particular area could adversely affect our ability to lease apartments and to increase or maintain rental rates. The current challenges in the credit and housing markets have increased housing inventory that competes with our apartment properties.
Our subsidiaries may be prohibited from making distributions and other payments to us.
All of our properties are owned, and all of our operations are conducted, by us and our subsidiaries. As a result, we depend on distributions and other payments from our subsidiaries in order to satisfy our financial obligations and make payments to our investors. The ability of our subsidiaries to make such distributions and other payments depends on their earnings and cash flows and may be subject to statutory or contractual limitations. As an equity investor in our subsidiaries, our right to receive assets upon their liquidation or reorganization will be effectively subordinated to the claims of their creditors. To the extent that we are recognized as a creditor of such subsidiaries, our claims may still be subordinate to any security interest in or other lien on their assets and to any of their debt or other obligations that are senior to our claims.
Redevelopment and construction risks could affect our profitability.
We intend to continue to redevelop certain of our properties. These activities are subject to the following risks:
• | we may be unable to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, occupancy, or other required governmental or third party permits and authorizations, which could result in increased costs or the delay or abandonment of opportunities; |
• | we may incur costs that exceed our original estimates due to increased material, labor or other costs; |
• | we may be unable to complete construction and lease up of a property on schedule, resulting in increased construction and financing costs and a decrease in expected rental revenues; |
• | occupancy rates and rents at a property may fail to meet our expectations for a number of reasons, including changes in market and economic conditions beyond our control and the development by competitors of competing communities; |
• | we may be unable to obtain financing with favorable terms, or at all, for the proposed development of a property, which may cause us to delay or abandon an opportunity; |
• | we may abandon opportunities that we have already begun to explore for a number of reasons, including changes in local market conditions or increases in construction or financing costs, and, as a result, we may fail to recover expenses already incurred in exploring those opportunities; |
• | we may incur liabilities to third parties during the redevelopment process, for example, in connection with resident lease terminations, or managing existing improvements on the site prior to resident lease terminations; and |
• | loss of a key member of a project team could adversely affect our ability to deliver redevelopment projects on time and within our budget. |
11
Table of Contents
If we are not successful in our acquisition of properties, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
The selective acquisition of properties is a component of our strategy. However, we may not be able to complete transactions successfully in the future. Although we seek to acquire properties when such acquisitions increase our net income, Funds From Operations or net asset value, such transactions may fail to perform in accordance with our expectations. In particular, following acquisition, the value and operational performance of a property may be diminished if obsolescence or neighborhood changes occur before we are able to redevelop or sell the property.
We may be subject to litigation associated with partnership acquisitions that could increase our expenses and prevent completion of beneficial transactions.
We have engaged in, and intend to continue to engage in, the selective acquisition of interests in partnerships controlled by us that own apartment properties. In some cases, we have acquired the general partner of a partnership and then made an offer to acquire the limited partners’ interests in the partnership. In these transactions, we may be subject to litigation based on claims that we, as the general partner, have breached our fiduciary duty to our limited partners or that the transaction violates the relevant partnership agreement or state law. Although we intend to comply with our fiduciary obligations and the relevant partnership agreements, we may incur additional costs in connection with the defense or settlement of this type of litigation. In some cases, this type of litigation may adversely affect our desire to proceed with, or our ability to complete, a particular transaction. Any litigation of this type could also have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
We are self-insured for certain risks, and the cost of insurance, increased claims activity or losses resulting from catastrophic events may affect our operating results and financial condition.
We are self-insured for a portion of our consolidated properties’ exposure to casualty losses resulting from fire, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood and other perils. We recognize casualty losses or gains based on the net book value of the affected property and any related insurance proceeds. In many instances, the actual cost to repair or replace the property may exceed its net book value and any insurance proceeds. We also insure certain unconsolidated properties for a portion of their exposure to such losses. In addition, we are self-insured for a portion of our exposure to third-party claims related to our employee health insurance plans, workers’ compensation coverage and general liability exposure. With respect to our insurance obligations to unconsolidated properties and our exposure to claims of third parties, we establish reserves at levels that reflect our known and estimated losses. The ultimate cost of losses and the impact of unforeseen events may vary materially from recorded reserves, and variances may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. We purchase insurance (or reinsurance where we insure unconsolidated properties) to reduce our exposure to losses and limit our financial losses on large individual risks. The availability and cost of insurance are determined by market conditions outside our control. No assurance can be made that we will be able to obtain and maintain insurance at the same levels and on the same terms as we do today. If we are not able to obtain or maintain insurance in amounts we consider appropriate for our business, or if the cost of obtaining such insurance increases materially, we may have to retain a larger portion of the potential loss associated with our exposures to risks. The extent of our losses in connection with catastrophic events is a function of the severity of the event and the total amount of exposure in the affected area. When we have geographic concentration of exposures, a single catastrophe (such as an earthquake) or destructive weather trend affecting a region may have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations. We cannot accurately predict catastrophes, or the number and type of catastrophic events that will affect us. As a result, our operating and financial results may vary significantly from one period to the next. While we anticipate and plan for losses, there can be no assurance that our financial results will not be adversely affected by our exposure to losses arising from catastrophic events in the future that exceed our previous experience and assumptions.
We depend on our senior management.
Our success depends upon the retention of our senior management, including Terry Considine, Aimco’s chief executive officer. There are no assurances that we would be able to find qualified replacements for the individuals who make up our senior management if their services were no longer available. The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We do not currently maintain key-man life insurance for any of our employees. The loss of any member of senior management could adversely affect our ability to pursue effectively our business strategy.
12
Table of Contents
Government housing regulations may limit the opportunities at some of our properties and failure to comply with resident qualification requirements may result in financial penalties and/or loss of benefits, such as rental revenues paid by government agencies.
We own consolidated and unconsolidated equity interests in certain properties and manage other properties that benefit from governmental programs intended to provide housing to people with low or moderate incomes. These programs, which are usually administered by HUD or state housing finance agencies, typically provide mortgage insurance, favorable financing terms, tax-credit equity, or rental assistance payments to the property owners. As a condition of the receipt of assistance under these programs, the properties must comply with various requirements, which typically limit rents to pre-approved amounts and impose restrictions on resident incomes. Failure to comply with these requirements and restrictions may result in financial penalties or loss of benefits. We usually need to obtain the approval of HUD in order to acquire or dispose of a significant interest in or manage a HUD-assisted property. We may not always receive such approval.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, for continuing and discontinued operations, our rental revenues include $119.1 million, $123.8 million and $135.2 million, respectively, of subsidies from government agencies. Any loss of such benefits would adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations.
Laws benefiting disabled persons may result in our incurrence of unanticipated expenses.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all places intended to be used by the public are required to meet certain Federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Likewise, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied after March 13, 1990, to be accessible to the handicapped. These and other Federal, state and local laws may require modifications to our properties, or affect renovations of the properties. Noncompliance with these laws could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature, which could result in substantial capital expenditures. Although we believe that our properties are substantially in compliance with present requirements, we may incur unanticipated expenses to comply with the ADA and the FHAA in connection with the ongoing operation or redevelopment of our properties.
Potential liability or other expenditures associated with potential environmental contamination may be costly.
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property, including lead-based paint. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of properties, we could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with our properties or properties we acquire or manage in the future.
13
Table of Contents
Moisture infiltration and resulting mold remediation may be costly.
We have been named as a defendant in lawsuits that have alleged personal injury and property damage as a result of the presence of mold. In addition, we are aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements. We have only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure. We have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training, and include a detailed moisture intrusion and mold assessment during acquisition due diligence. We believe these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure from our properties and will minimize the effects that mold may have on our residents. To date, we have not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions. Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change, we can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Aimco’s failure to qualify as a REIT would place us in default under our primary credit facilities.
Aimco believes it operates, and has always operated, in a manner that enables it to meet the requirements for qualification as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. However, Aimco’s current and continuing qualification as a REIT depends on its ability to meet the various requirements imposed by the Code, which are related to organizational structure, distribution levels, diversity of stock ownership and certain restrictions with regard to owned assets and categories of income. These requirements are complex and accordingly there can be no assurances that the Internal Revenue Service will not contend that Aimco has violated provisions of the Code and fails to qualify as a REIT. If Aimco fails to qualify as a REIT, we would then be in default under our primary credit facilities.
REIT distribution requirements limit our available cash.
REIT distribution requirements limit Aimco’s available cash. As a REIT, Aimco is subject to annual distribution requirements. As Aimco’s operating partnership, we pay distributions intended to enable Aimco to satisfy these distribution requirements. This limits the amount of cash we have available for other business purposes, including amounts to fund growth.
14
Table of Contents
Aimco’s charter and Maryland law may limit the ability of a third party to acquire control of Aimco and, therefore, the Partnership.
A third party is not likely to make an offer to acquire the Partnership unless that third party is also acquiring control of Aimco. The 8.7% ownership limit in Aimco’s charter may have the effect of precluding acquisition of control of Aimco by a third party without the consent of Aimco’s board of directors. Aimco’s charter authorizes its board of directors to issue up to 510,587,500 shares of capital stock. As of December 31, 2008, 426,157,736 shares were classified as Aimco Class A Common Stock, of which 101,176,232 were outstanding, and 84,429,764 shares were classified as preferred stock, of which 24,950,146 were outstanding. Under Aimco’s charter, its board of directors has the authority to classify and reclassify any of Aimco’s unissued shares of preferred stock into shares of capital stock with such preferences, rights, powers and restrictions as Aimco’s board of directors may determine. The authorization and issuance of a new class of capital stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing someone from taking control of Aimco, even if a change in control was in the best interests of Aimco’s stockholders or the Partnership’s Limited Partners.
Maryland business statutes may limit the ability of a third party to acquire control of Aimco and, therefore, the Partnership.
As noted above, a third party is not likely to make an offer to acquire the Partnership unless that third party is also acquiring control of Aimco. As a Maryland corporation, Aimco is subject to various Maryland laws that may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire Aimco and of increasing the difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if an acquisition would be in the best interests of Aimco’s stockholders or the Limited Partners. The Maryland General Corporation Law restricts mergers and other business combination transactions between Aimco and any person who acquires beneficial ownership of shares of Aimco’s stock representing 10% or more of the voting power without prior approval of Aimco’s board of directors. Any such business combination transaction could not be completed until five years after the person acquired such voting power, and generally only with the approval of stockholders representing 80% of all votes entitled to be cast and 66 2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast, excluding the interested stockholder, or upon payment of a fair price. Maryland law also provides generally that a person who acquires shares of Aimco’s capital stock that represent 10% or more of the voting power in electing directors will have no voting rights unless approved by a vote of two-thirds of the shares eligible to vote. Additionally, Maryland law provides, among other things, that the board of directors has broad discretion in adopting stockholders’ rights plans and has the sole power to fix the record date, time and place for special meetings of the stockholders. In addition, Maryland law provides that corporations that:
• | have at least three directors who are not employees of the entity or related to an acquiring person; and |
• | are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, |
may elect in their charter or bylaws or by resolution of the board of directors to be subject to all or part of a special subtitle that provides that:
• | the corporation will have a staggered board of directors; |
• | any director may be removed only for cause and by the vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors generally, even if a lesser proportion is provided in the charter or bylaws; |
• | the number of directors may only be set by the board of directors, even if the procedure is contrary to the charter or bylaws; |
• | vacancies may only be filled by the remaining directors, even if the procedure is contrary to the charter or bylaws; and |
• | the secretary of the corporation may call a special meeting of stockholders at the request of stockholders only on the written request of the stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting, even if the procedure is contrary to the charter or bylaws. |
To date, Aimco has not made any of the elections described above. However, these provisions of Maryland law could have the effect of delaying or preventing someone from taking control of Aimco, even if a change in control was in the best interests of Aimco’s stockholders or the Partnership’s Limited Partners.
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
15
Table of Contents
Item 2.Properties
Our properties are located in 44 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Our geographic allocation strategy focuses on target markets which are grouped by region below. The following table sets forth information on all of our property operations as of December 31, 2008 and 2007:
2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||
Number of | Number | Number of | Number | |||||||||||||
Properties | of Units | Properties | of Units | |||||||||||||
Conventional: | ||||||||||||||||
Pacific | 38 | 10,504 | 39 | 10,616 | ||||||||||||
Northeast | 66 | 20,169 | 70 | 23,490 | ||||||||||||
Sunbelt | 104 | 30,928 | 144 | 39,554 | ||||||||||||
Chicago | 19 | 5,555 | 22 | 6,344 | ||||||||||||
Total target markets | 227 | 67,156 | 275 | 80,004 | ||||||||||||
Opportunistic and other markets | 83 | 26,288 | 164 | 47,528 | ||||||||||||
Total conventional owned and managed | 310 | 93,444 | 439 | 127,532 | ||||||||||||
Affordable owned and managed | 289 | 33,888 | 312 | 37,104 | ||||||||||||
Property management | 34 | 3,252 | 36 | 3,228 | ||||||||||||
Asset management | 359 | 32,223 | 382 | 35,176 | ||||||||||||
Total | 992 | 162,807 | 1,169 | 203,040 | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2008, we owned an equity interest in and consolidated 514 properties containing 117,719 apartment units, which we refer to as “consolidated properties.” These consolidated properties contain, on average, 229 apartment units, with the largest property containing 2,113 apartment units. These properties offer residents a range of amenities, including swimming pools, clubhouses, spas, fitness centers and tennis courts. Many of the apartment units offer features such as vaulted ceilings, fireplaces, washer and dryer hook-ups, cable television, balconies and patios. Additional information on our consolidated properties is contained in “Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. At December 31, 2008, we held an equity interest in and did not consolidate 85 properties containing 9,613 apartment units, which we refer to as “unconsolidated properties.” In addition, we provided property management services for 34 properties containing 3,252 apartment units, and asset management services for 359 properties containing 32,223 apartment units. In certain cases, we may indirectly own generally less than one percent of the operations of such properties through a partnership syndication or other fund.
Substantially all of our consolidated properties are encumbered by mortgage indebtedness. At December 31, 2008, our consolidated properties classified as held for use in our consolidated balance sheet were encumbered by aggregate mortgage indebtedness totaling $6,281.1 million having an aggregate weighted average interest rate of 5.55%. Such mortgage indebtedness was secured by 497 properties with a combined net book value of $8,005.6 million. Included in the 497 properties, we had a total of 37 mortgage loans on 25 properties, with an aggregate principal balance outstanding of $483.7 million, that were each secured by property and cross-collateralized with certain (but not all) other mortgage loans within this group of mortgage loans (see Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for additional information about our indebtedness).
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
See the information under the caption “Legal Matters” in Note 8 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for information regarding legal proceedings, which information is incorporated by reference in this Item 3.
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2008.
16
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5.Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
There is no public market for the OP Units, and we do not intend to list the OP Units on any securities exchange. In addition, the Partnership Agreement restricts the transferability of OP Units. The following table sets forth the distributions declared per common OP Unit in each quarterly period during the two years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
Distributions | Distributions | |||||||||||||||
Declared | Declared | |||||||||||||||
(per unit, | (per unit, | |||||||||||||||
adjusted) | adjusted) | |||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 (2) | 2007 (2) | ||||||||||||
December 31 | $ | 3.88 | (1) | $ | 3.11 | (1) | $ | 3.22 | $ | 2.18 | ||||||
September 30 | 3.00 | (1) | 0.60 | 2.20 | 0.42 | |||||||||||
June 30 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.44 | 0.42 | ||||||||||||
March 31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
(1) | During 2007 and 2008, we declared special distributions, which were paid part in cash and part in common OP Units issued to Aimco. These special distributions were in connection with special dividends declared by Aimco’s board of directors to address taxable gains from 2007 and 2008 property sales. |
Portion | Portion Paid | Effective | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Paid to | to Aimco in | Common | Increase in | ||||||||||||||||||
Declaration | Payment | Distribution | Total | Cash | Aimco in | common OP | OP Units | Units on | ||||||||||||||
Date | Date | Declared | Distribution | Paid | Cash | Units | issued | Record Date | ||||||||||||||
December 21, 2007 | January 30, 2008 | $ | 2.51 | $257.2 million | $79.3 million | $55.0 million | $177.9 million | 4,594,074 | 4.48 | % | ||||||||||||
July 18, 2008 | August 29, 2008 | $ | 3.00 | $285.5 million | $80.0 million | $51.4 million | $205.5 million | 5,731,310 | 6.02 | % | ||||||||||||
October 16, 2008 | December 1, 2008 | $ | 1.80 | $176.6 million | $70.3 million | $53.2 million | $106.4 million | 12,572,267 | 12.81 | % | ||||||||||||
December 18, 2008 | January 29, 2009 | $ | 2.08 | $230.1 million | $80.3 million | $60.6 million | $149.8 million | 15,627,330 | 14.12 | % |
(2) | Distributions declared per unit have been retroactively adjusted for the effect of additional common OP Units issued to Aimco pursuant to the special distributions discussed in Note (1) above. |
Aimco’s board of directors determines and declares Aimco’s dividends. In making a dividend determination, Aimco’s board of directors considers a variety of factors, including: REIT distribution requirements; current market conditions; liquidity needs and other uses of cash, such as for deleveraging and accretive investment activities, including the repurchase of Aimco’s Class A Common Stock and preferred stock. Aimco previously announced that it intends to adjust its regular annual per share dividend from $2.40 (or $0.60 per quarter) to $1.00 (or $0.25 per quarter). Aimco’s board of directors may further adjust the dividend amount or the frequency with which the dividend is paid based on then prevailing facts and circumstances. We intend for our distributions to be consistent with Aimco’s dividends.
On February 25, 2009, there were 124,296,393 common OP Units outstanding, held by 2,622 unitholders of record.
Our Partnership Agreement generally provides that after holding the common OP Units for one year, our Limited Partners have the right to redeem their common OP Units for cash, subject to our prior right to cause Aimco to acquire some or all of the common OP Units tendered for redemption in exchange for shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. Common OP Units redeemed for Aimco Class A Common Stock are generally exchanged on a one-for-one basis (subject to antidilution adjustments).
17
Table of Contents
During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2008, approximately 3,400 and 114,200 common OP Units were redeemed in exchange for an equal number of shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock, respectively (4,400 and 160,000 common OP Units, respectively, after adjustment for the shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock issued pursuant to the special dividends declared by Aimco’s board of directors). During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2008, no preferred OP Units were issued in exchange for shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. The following table summarizes repurchases of our equity securities for the three months ended December 31, 2008:
Total Number of | ||||||||||||||||
Units Purchased | Maximum Number | |||||||||||||||
as Part of | of Units that | |||||||||||||||
Publicly | May Yet Be | |||||||||||||||
Total Number | Average | Announced | Purchased Under | |||||||||||||
of Units | Price Paid | Plans or | Plans or | |||||||||||||
Fiscal period (2) | Purchased | per Unit | Programs (1) | Programs (1) | ||||||||||||
October 1 – October 31, 2008 | 2,018,900 | $ | 24.77 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
November 1 – November 30, 2008 | 908 | 18.48 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
December 1 – December 31, 2008 | 442 | 11.98 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Total | 2,020,250 | $ | 24.75 | |||||||||||||
(1) | The terms of our Partnership Agreement do not provide for a maximum number of units that may be repurchased, and other than the express terms of our Partnership Agreement, we have no publicly announced plans or programs of repurchase. However, whenever Aimco repurchases its Class A Common Stock, it is expected that Aimco will fund the repurchase with a concurrent repurchase by us of common OP Units held by Aimco at a price per unit that is equal to the price per share paid for the Class A Common Stock. | |
(2) | During the year ended December 31, 2008, we repurchased approximately 13.9 million common OP Units concurrent with Aimco’s repurchase of an equal number of shares of Aimco Class A Common stock for approximately $473.5 million, or $34.02 per unit, or 19.3 million common OP Units for $24.48 per unit, as adjusted for common OP Units issued to Aimco in the special distributions discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8. Also during the year ended December 31, 2008, we redeemed approximately 49,800 common OP Units for approximately $2.0 million in transactions with common OP unitholders other than Aimco. |
Distribution Payments
Our Credit Agreement includes customary covenants, including a restriction on distributions and other restricted payments, but permits distributions during any four consecutive fiscal quarters in an aggregate amount of up to 95% of Funds From Operations for such period, subject to certain non-cash adjustments, or such amount as may be necessary for Aimco to maintain its REIT status.
18
Table of Contents
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial data is based on our audited historical financial statements. This information should be read in conjunction with such financial statements, including the notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included herein or in previous filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 (1) | 2006 (1) | 2005 (1) | 2004 (1) | ||||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
OPERATING DATA: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 1,457,918 | $ | 1,376,820 | $ | 1,274,163 | $ | 1,058,290 | $ | 950,894 | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | (1,253,151 | ) | (1,135,065 | ) | (1,044,052 | ) | (873,442 | ) | (759,647 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating income | 204,767 | 241,755 | 230,111 | 184,848 | 191,247 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations (2) | (118,863 | ) | (57,462 | ) | (54,040 | ) | (32,923 | ) | 51,045 | |||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net (3) | 594,358 | 91,579 | 251,104 | 113,669 | 246,033 | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | — | — | — | — | (3,957 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income | 475,495 | 34,117 | 197,064 | 80,744 | 293,121 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to preferred unitholders | 61,354 | 73,144 | 90,527 | 98,946 | 96,922 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | 414,141 | (39,027 | ) | 106,537 | (18,202 | ) | 196,199 | |||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common unit — basic and diluted (4): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations (net of income attributable to preferred unitholders) | $ | (1.38 | ) | $ | (0.87 | ) | $ | (0.96 | ) | $ | (0.88 | ) | $ | (0.31 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | $ | 3.17 | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.70 | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | 1.32 | ||||||||
BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation | $ | 8,102,873 | $ | 7,887,547 | $ | 7,325,722 | $ | 6,546,807 | $ | 6,029,368 | ||||||||||
Total assets | 9,418,008 | 10,620,597 | 10,303,091 | 10,031,759 | 10,086,229 | |||||||||||||||
Total indebtedness | 6,777,121 | 6,402,972 | 5,612,045 | 4,874,966 | 4,249,107 | |||||||||||||||
Partners’ capital | 1,435,140 | 1,876,006 | 2,537,602 | 2,945,402 | 3,291,087 | |||||||||||||||
OTHER INFORMATION: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared per common unit (4) | $ | 5.86 | $ | 3.02 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 2.10 | $ | 1.69 | ||||||||||
Total consolidated properties (end of period) | 514 | 657 | 703 | 619 | 676 | |||||||||||||||
Total consolidated apartment units (end of period) | 117,719 | 153,758 | 162,432 | 158,548 | 169,932 | |||||||||||||||
Total unconsolidated properties (end of period) | 85 | 94 | 102 | 264 | 330 | |||||||||||||||
Total unconsolidated apartment units (end of period) | 9,613 | 10,878 | 11,791 | 35,269 | 44,728 | |||||||||||||||
Units managed (end of period) (5) | 35,475 | 38,404 | 42,190 | 46,667 | 49,074 |
(1) | Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the 2008 presentation. These reclassifications primarily represent presentation changes related to discontinued operations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144. | |
(2) | Loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008, includes a $107.5 million pre-tax provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets, which is discussed further inManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operationsin Item 7. | |
(3) | Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2008, includes $618.2 million in gains on disposition of real estate, net of minority partners’ interest, resulting from the sale of 151 properties, which is discussed further inManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operationsin Item 7. | |
(4) | Per unit amounts for each of the periods presented have been retroactively adjusted for the effect of common OP Units issued to Aimco in connection with special distributions paid during 2008 and in January 2009 (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further discussion of the special distributions). | |
(5) | The years ended 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 include 32,223, 35,176, 38,617, 41,421 and 41,233 units, respectively, for which we provide asset management services only, although in certain cases we may indirectly own generally less than one percent of the operations of such properties through a partnership syndication or other fund. |
19
Table of Contents
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Overview
We are a limited partnership engaged in the acquisition, ownership, management and redevelopment of apartment properties. We are the operating partnership for Aimco, which is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. Our property operations are characterized by diversification of product, location and price point. As of December 31, 2008, we owned or managed 992 apartment properties containing 162,807 units located in 44 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Our primary sources of income and cash are rents associated with apartment leases.
The key financial indicators that we use in managing our business and in evaluating our financial condition and operating performance are: NAV; Funds From Operations, or FFO; Adjusted Funds From Operations, or AFFO, which is FFO less spending for Capital Replacements; same store property operating results; net operating income; net operating income less spending for Capital Replacements, or Free Cash Flow; Economic Income; financial coverage ratios; and leverage as shown on our balance sheet. FFO and Capital Replacements are defined and further described in the sections captioned “Funds From Operations” and “Capital Expenditures” below. The key macro-economic factors and non-financial indicators that affect our financial condition and operating performance are: rates of job growth; single-family and multifamily housing starts; interest rates; and availability and cost of financing.
Because our operating results depend primarily on income from our properties, the supply and demand for apartments influences our operating results. Additionally, the level of expenses required to operate and maintain our properties, the pace and price at which we redevelop, acquire and dispose of our apartment properties, and the volume and timing of fee transactions affect our operating results. Our cost of capital is affected by the conditions in the capital and credit markets and the terms that we negotiate for our equity and debt financings.
As the financial and economic environment became more challenging during 2008, we focused on: serving and retaining residents; controlling costs and increasing efficiency through improved business processes and automation; controlling capital spending; minimizing our cost of capital, building cash and reducing leverage; and upgrading the quality of our portfolio through portfolio management. Additionally, in connection with 2008 property sales and expected reductions in redevelopment and transactional activities, we initiated an organizational restructuring during the fourth quarter of 2008. We expect 2009 to continue to be very difficult and will continue to evaluate our activities and organizational structure and intend to adjust as necessary.
Our portfolio management strategy includes property dispositions and acquisitions aimed at concentrating our portfolio in our target markets. Over the next two years and subject to market conditions and various REIT requirements, we expect to sell approximately $2.0 billion of conventional and affordable assets located primarily outside these target markets.
20
Table of Contents
The following discussion and analysis of the results of our operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
Results of Operations
Overview
2008 compared to 2007
We reported net income of $475.5 million and net income attributable to common unitholders of $414.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to net income of $34.1 million and net loss attributable to common unitholders of $39.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, increases of $441.4 million and $453.1 million, respectively. These increases were principally due to the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail below:
• | an increase in income from discontinued operations, primarily related to higher net gains on sales of real estate; |
• | an increase in gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other, primarily related to our disposition in 2008 of interests in two unconsolidated real estate partnerships; and |
• | an increase in net operating income associated with property operations, reflecting improved operations of our same store properties and other properties. |
The effects of these items on our operating results were partially offset by:
• | a provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets; |
• | an increase in depreciation and amortization expense, primarily related to completed redevelopments; and |
• | a restructuring provision recognized during the fourth quarter of 2008. |
2007 compared to 2006
We reported net income of $34.1 million and net loss attributable to common unitholders of $39.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to net income of $197.1 million and net income attributable to common unitholders of $106.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, decreases of $163.0 million and $145.5 million, respectively. These decreases were principally due to the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail below:
• | a decrease in income from discontinued operations, primarily due to decreases in net gains on dispositions of real estate; |
• | an increase in interest expense, reflecting higher loan principal balances resulting from refinancings, share repurchases and acquisitions; and |
• | an increase in depreciation and amortization expense, primarily related to completed redevelopments and newly consolidated properties. |
The effects of these items on our operating results were partially offset by:
• | an increase in net operating income associated with property operations, reflecting improved operations of our same store properties and other properties; and |
• | the recognition in 2007 of deferred debt extinguishment gains in connection with the refinancing of certain mortgage loans that had been restructured in a 1997 bankruptcy settlement. |
The following paragraphs discuss these and other items affecting the results of our operations in more detail.
Business Segment Operating Results
We have two reportable segments: real estate (owning, operating and redeveloping apartments) and investment management (portfolio strategy, capital allocation, joint ventures, tax credit syndication, acquisitions, dispositions and other transaction activities). Several members of our executive management team comprise our chief operating decision maker, as defined in FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131,Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, and use various generally accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance and financial condition of the business, including: NAV; FFO; AFFO; same store property operating results; net operating income; Free Cash Flow; Economic Income; financial coverage ratios; and leverage as shown on our balance sheet. The chief operating decision maker emphasizes net operating income as a key measurement of segment profit or loss. Segment net operating income is generally defined as segment revenues less direct segment operating expenses.
21
Table of Contents
Real Estate Segment
Our real estate segment involves the ownership and operation of properties that generate rental and other property-related income through the leasing of apartment units. Our real estate segment’s net operating income also includes income from property management services performed for unconsolidated partnerships and unrelated parties.
The following table summarizes our real estate segment’s net operating income for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Real estate segment revenues: | ||||||||||||
Rental and other property revenues | $ | 1,350,950 | $ | 1,296,142 | $ | 1,212,958 | ||||||
Property management revenues, primarily from affiliates | 6,345 | 6,923 | 12,312 | |||||||||
1,357,295 | 1,303,065 | 1,225,270 | ||||||||||
Real estate segment expenses: | ||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | 626,001 | 596,902 | 549,716 | |||||||||
Property management expenses | 5,385 | 6,678 | 6,289 | |||||||||
631,386 | 603,580 | 556,005 | ||||||||||
Real estate segment net operating income | $ | 725,909 | $ | 699,485 | $ | 669,265 | ||||||
Consolidated Conventional Same Store Property Operating Results
Same store operating results is a key indicator we use to assess the performance of our property operations and to understand the period over period operations of a consistent portfolio of properties. We define “consolidated same store” properties as our conventional properties (i) that we manage, (ii) in which our ownership interest exceeds 10%, (iii) the operations of which have been stabilized, and (iv) that have not been sold or classified as held for sale, in each case, throughout all periods presented. The following tables summarize the operations of our consolidated conventional rental property operations:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||
Consolidated same store revenues | $ | 837,748 | $ | 821,287 | 2.0 | % | ||||||
Consolidated same store expenses | 325,514 | 329,122 | -1.1 | % | ||||||||
Same store net operating income | 512,234 | 492,165 | 4.1 | % | ||||||||
Reconciling items (1) | 213,675 | 207,320 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||
Real estate segment net operating income | $ | 725,909 | $ | 699,485 | 3.8 | % | ||||||
Same store operating statistics: | ||||||||||||
Properties | 219 | 219 | — | |||||||||
Apartment units | 69,565 | 69,565 | — | |||||||||
Average physical occupancy | 94.9 | % | 94.7 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||||
Average rent/unit/month | $ | 970 | $ | 954 | 1.7 | % |
(1) | Reflects property revenues and property operating expenses related to consolidated properties other than same store properties (e.g., affordable, acquisition, redevelopment and newly consolidated properties) and casualty gains and losses. |
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, consolidated same store net operating income increased $20.1 million, or 4.1%. Revenues increased $16.5 million, or 2.0%, primarily due to higher average rent (up $16 per unit) and an increase in average physical occupancy. Expenses decreased by $3.6 million, or 1.1%, primarily due to decreases of $2.2 million in repair and maintenance expense, $1.4 million in turnover expense and $1.9 million in employee compensation and related expenses, offset by an increase of $2.0 million in utilities expense.
22
Table of Contents
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, consolidated real estate segment net operating income related to consolidated properties other than same store properties increased by $6.4 million, or 3.1%. Increases in net operating income attributable to affordable, acquisition and redevelopment properties contributed to the increase, and were partially offset by increases in casualty losses of $6.5 million, including $2.7 million related to Tropical Storm Fay and Hurricane Ike during the year ended December 31, 2008.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | Change | ||||||||||
Consolidated same store revenues | $ | 821,287 | $ | 780,052 | 5.3 | % | ||||||
Consolidated same store expenses | 329,122 | 315,461 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||
Same store net operating income | 492,165 | 464,591 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||
Reconciling items (1) | 207,320 | 204,674 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||
Real estate segment net operating income | $ | 699,485 | $ | 669,265 | 4.5 | % | ||||||
Same store operating statistics: | ||||||||||||
Properties | 219 | 219 | — | |||||||||
Apartment units | 69,565 | 69,565 | — | |||||||||
Average physical occupancy | 94.7 | % | 94.7 | % | — | |||||||
Average rent/unit/month | $ | 954 | $ | 914 | 4.4 | % |
(1) | Reflects property revenues and property operating expenses related to consolidated properties other than same store properties (e.g., affordable, acquisition, redevelopment and newly consolidated properties) and casualty gains and losses. |
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, consolidated same store net operating income increased $27.6 million, or 5.9%. Revenues increased $41.2 million, or 5.3%, primarily due to higher average rent (up $40 per unit) and a $6.4 million increase in utility reimbursements. Expenses increased by $13.7 million, or 4.3%, primarily due to increases of $5.1 million in employee compensation and related expenses, $2.5 million in contract services expense, $2.3 million in marketing expense, $2.1 million in taxes and $2.0 million in insurance expense.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, consolidated real estate segment net operating income related to consolidated properties other than same store properties increased by $2.6 million, or 1.3%. Increases in net operating income attributable to affordable, acquisition and redevelopment properties contributed to the increase, and were partially offset by an unfavorable change in casualty losses, resulting from casualty gains recognized in 2006.
Investment Management Segment
Our investment management segment includes activities and services related to our owned portfolio of properties as well as services provided to affiliated partnerships. Activities and services that fall within investment management include portfolio strategy, capital allocation, joint ventures, tax credit syndication, acquisitions, dispositions and other transaction activities. Within our owned portfolio, we refer to these activities as “Portfolio Management,” and their benefit is seen in property operating results and in investment gains. For affiliated partnerships, we refer to these activities as “Asset Management,” for which we are separately compensated through fees paid by third party investors. The expenses of this segment consist primarily of the costs of departments that perform these activities. These activities are conducted in part by our taxable subsidiaries, and the related net operating income may be subject to income taxes.
Transactions occur on varying timetables; thus, the income varies from period to period. We have affiliated real estate partnerships for which we have identified a pipeline of transactional opportunities. As a result, we view asset management fees as a predictable part of our core business strategy. Asset management revenue includes certain fees that were earned in a prior period, but not recognized at that time because collectibility was not reasonably assured. Those fees may be recognized in a subsequent period upon occurrence of a transaction or a high level of the probability of occurrence of a transaction within twelve months, or improvement in operations that generates sufficient cash to pay the fees.
23
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the net operating income from our investment management segment for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Asset management and tax credit revenues | $ | 100,623 | $ | 73,755 | $ | 48,893 | ||||||
Investment management expenses | 21,389 | 20,514 | 14,742 | |||||||||
Investment segment net operating income (1) | $ | 79,234 | $ | 53,241 | $ | 34,151 | ||||||
(1) | Excludes certain items of income and expense, which are included in our consolidated statements of income in: other expenses, net; interest expense; interest income; (loss) gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other; and minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships. |
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, net operating income from investment management increased $26.0 million, or 48.8%. This increase is attributable to a $30.7 million increase in promote income, which is income earned in connection with the disposition of properties owned by our consolidated joint ventures, and a $9.2 million increase in other general partner transactional fees, partially offset by a $7.4 million decrease in asset management fees, a $0.9 million increase in investment management expenses and a $5.0 million decrease in revenues associated with our affordable housing tax credit syndication business, including syndication fees and other revenue earned in connection with these arrangements.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, net operating income from investment management increased $19.1 million, or 55.9%. This increase is primarily attributable to a $9.6 million increase in promote income, an $8.6 million increase in asset management fees and an increase of $9.1 million in revenues associated with our affordable housing tax credit syndication business, including syndication fees and other revenue earned in connection with these arrangements. These increases were partially offset by an increase in expenses and a decrease in other general partner transactional fees.
Other Operating Expenses (Income)
Depreciation and Amortization
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, depreciation and amortization increased $54.8 million, or 13.6%. This increase reflects depreciation of $74.8 million for newly acquired properties, completed redevelopments and other capital projects recently placed in service. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of $25.7 million in depreciation adjustments necessary to reduce the carrying amount of buildings and improvements to their estimated disposition value, or zero in the case of a planned demolition (seeImpairment of Long-Lived Assetsin Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8).
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, depreciation and amortization increased $35.0 million, or 9.5%. This increase reflects depreciation of $23.7 million for newly acquired properties, completed redevelopments and other capital projects recently placed in service. Depreciation also increased by approximately $8.6 million as a result of depreciation adjustments necessary to reduce the carrying amount of buildings and improvements to their estimated disposition value, or to zero in connection with a planned demolition (seeImpairment of Long-Lived Assetsin Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8).
General and Administrative Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, general and administrative expenses increased $8.4 million, or 9.2%. This increase is primarily attributable to higher personnel and related expenses of $6.1 million and an increase of $1.5 million in information technology communications costs.
24
Table of Contents
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.9 million, or 1.0%. This decrease is primarily due to a reduction in variable compensation, partially offset by an increase in salaries and benefits (net of capitalization) related to additional redevelopment personnel and an increase in director compensation resulting from the addition of two new board members.
Other Expenses, Net
Other expenses, net includes franchise taxes, risk management activities, partnership administration expenses and certain non-recurring items.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, other expenses, net changed unfavorably by $3.4 million. The net unfavorable change includes a $5.4 million write-off of certain communications hardware and capitalized costs during 2008 (seeCapitalized Software Costsin Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8) and a $1.2 million write-off of redevelopment costs associated with a change in the planned use of a property during 2008. The net unfavorable change also reflects $3.6 million of income recognized in 2007 related to the transfer of certain property rights to an unrelated party. These unfavorable changes were partially offset by a $3.7 million reduction in expenses of our self insurance activities (net of $2.8 million of costs in 2008 related to Tropical Storm Fay and Hurricane Ike) and a net decrease of $2.0 million in costs related to certain litigation matters.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, other expenses, net changed unfavorably by $3.6 million. The net unfavorable change is primarily attributable to our self insurance activities, including a $7.9 million increase in claims on our consolidated properties in excess of reimbursements from third parties, and the settlement of certain litigation matters which resulted in a $2.5 million unfavorable change during the year ended December 31, 2007. These unfavorable changes were partially offset by favorable changes related to a $2.9 million charge recorded in 2006 related to the valuation of the High Performance Units (see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8) and a $1.7 million charge for one-time benefits to certain employees terminated in 2006 that did not recur in 2007. Other expenses, net for the year ended December 31, 2007, also includes $3.6 million of income related to the transfer of certain property rights to an unrelated party.
Restructuring Costs
In connection with 2008 property sales and an expected reduction in redevelopment and transactional activities, during the three months ended December 31, 2008, we initiated an organizational restructuring program that included reductions in workforce and related costs, reductions in leased corporate facilities and abandonment of certain redevelopment projects and business pursuits. As a result, we recognized a restructuring charge of $22.8 million ($20.5 million net of tax), which consists of: severance costs of $12.9 million; unrecoverable lease obligations and related costs of $6.4 million related to space that we will no longer use; and the write-off of deferred transaction costs totaling $3.5 million associated with certain acquisitions and redevelopment opportunities that we will no longer pursue. No comparable restructuring costs were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2007 or 2006.
Interest Income
Interest income consists primarily of interest on notes receivable from non-affiliates and unconsolidated real estate partnerships, interest on cash and restricted cash accounts, and accretion of discounts on certain notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships. Transactions that result in accretion occur infrequently and thus accretion income may vary from period to period.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, interest income decreased $23.7 million, or 57.0%. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease of $16.0 million due to lower interest rates on notes receivable, cash and restricted cash balances and lower average balances. The decrease also includes the effect of a $5.8 million net adjustment to accretion on certain discounted notes during the year ended December 31, 2008, resulting from a change in the estimated timing and amount of collection, and $1.5 million of accretion income recognized during the year ended December 31, 2007, related to the prepayment of principal on certain discounted loans collateralized by properties in West Harlem in New York City, which were funded in November 2006.
25
Table of Contents
For the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, interest income increased $6.5 million, or 18.5%. This increase is primarily due to $5.9 million of interest income earned during 2007 on loans collateralized by properties in West Harlem in New York City, which were funded in November 2006, and an increase in interest income earned on escrowed funds related to a tax exempt bond financing transaction and certain property sales during 2007.
Interest Expense
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, interest expense, which includes the amortization of deferred financing costs, increased $13.3 million, or 3.7%. Interest on property loans payable increased $19.1 million due to higher balances resulting primarily from refinancing activities, offset by lower average interest rates. Interest expense also increased by $4.6 million due to decreases in capitalized interest related to redevelopment activities. These increases were partially offset by a $10.4 million decrease in corporate interest expense primarily due to lower average interest rates.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, interest expense, which includes the amortization of deferred financing costs, increased $29.4 million, or 9.0%. Interest on property debt increased $32.5 million primarily due to higher balances resulting from refinancing activities and mortgage loans on newly acquired properties, offset by lower weighted average rates. Corporate interest increased by $3.1 million as a result of higher weighted average rates and a higher average balance during the year ended December 31, 2007. These increases were partially offset by a $6.2 million increase in capitalized interest related to increased levels of redevelopment and entitlement activities.
Deficit Distributions to Minority Partners
When real estate partnerships that are consolidated in our financial statements disburse cash to partners in excess of the carrying amount of the minority interest, we record a charge equal to the excess amount, even though there is no economic effect or cost.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, deficit distributions to minority partners decreased $6.6 million. This decrease reflects lower levels of distributions to minority interests in consolidated real estate partnerships in 2008, including distributions in connection with debt refinancing transactions.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, deficit distributions to minority partners increased $17.1 million. This increase reflects higher levels of distributions to minority interests in consolidated real estate partnerships in 2007, including several large distributions in connection with debt refinancing transactions.
Provision for Operating Real Estate Impairment Losses
Real estate and other long-lived assets to be held and used are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, provision for operating real estate impairment losses increased by $4.0 million, from $1.6 million to $5.6 million. This increase is primarily attributed to a reduction in the estimated holding period for certain assets anticipated to sell within twelve months, but that did not otherwise meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale at December 31, 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, provision for operating real estate impairment losses increased by $2.4 million, from a recovery of $0.8 million in 2006 to a provision of $1.6 million in 2007. This increase is attributable to impairment losses recognized during 2007 on four properties classified as held for use relative to recoveries on previously recorded impairment losses recognized in 2006.
26
Table of Contents
Provision for Impairment Losses on Real Estate Development Assets
In connection with the preparation of our annual financial statements, we assessed the recoverability of our investment in our Lincoln Place property, located in Venice, California. Based upon the recent decline in land values in Southern California and the expected timing of our redevelopment efforts, we determined that the total carrying amount of the property was no longer probable of full recovery and, accordingly, during the three months ended December 31, 2008, recognized an impairment loss of $85.4 million ($55.6 million net of tax).
Similarly, we assessed the recoverability of our investment in Pacific Bay Vistas (formerly Treetops), a vacant property located in San Bruno, California, and determined that the carrying value for the property exceeded its estimated fair value. Accordingly, we recognized an impairment loss of $5.7 million for this property during the three months ended December 31, 2008.
As part of the March 2002 acquisition of Casden Properties, Inc., we invested $50.0 million for a 20% passive interest in Casden Properties LLC, an entity organized to buy, re-entitle and develop land parcels in Southern California. Based upon the profit allocation agreement, we account for this investment as a note receivable and have been amortizing the discounted value of the investment to the $50.0 million previously estimated to be collectible through January 2, 2009, the initial dissolution date of the entity. The managing member is seeking to extend the dissolution date. In connection with the preparation of our annual financial statements and as a result of the aforementioned decline in Southern California land values, we determined our recorded investment of $47.1 million is not fully recoverable, and accordingly recognized an impairment loss of $16.3 million ($10.0 million net of tax) during the three months ended December 31, 2008.
The impairments discussed above totaled $107.5 million and are included in provisions for impairment losses on real estate development assets in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in Item 8. We recognized no comparable impairments on real estate development assets during the years ended December 31, 2007 or 2006.
Gain on Dispositions of Unconsolidated Real Estate and Other
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other includes our share of gains related to dispositions of real estate by unconsolidated real estate partnerships, gains on disposition of interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships, gains on dispositions of land and other non-depreciable assets and costs related to asset disposal activities. For the year ended December 31, 2007, gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other also includes a gain on extinguishment of debt. Changes in the level of gains recognized from period to period reflect the changing level of disposition activity from period to period. Additionally, gains on properties sold are determined on an individual property basis or in the aggregate for a group of properties that are sold in a single transaction, and are not comparable period to period.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other increased $67.5 million. This increase is primarily attributable to a $98.4 million net gain on the disposition of interests in two unconsolidated real estate partnerships and a $1.7 million gain on the sale of an undeveloped land parcel during the year ended December 31, 2008. During 2007, we recognized a $6.0 million non-refundable option and extension fee resulting from the termination of rights under an option agreement to sell the North and Central towers of our Flamingo South Beach property, approximately $6.7 million of net gains on dispositions of land parcels and our share of gains on dispositions of properties by unconsolidated real estate partnerships, and a $19.4 million gain on debt extinguishment related to seven properties in the VMS partnership (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8).
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other increased $4.3 million. This increase is primarily related to a $19.4 million gain on debt extinguishment related to seven properties in the VMS partnership (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8), the recognition of a $6.0 million non-refundable option and extension fee resulting from the termination of rights under an option agreement to sell the North and Central towers of our Flamingo South Beach property, and approximately $6.7 million of net gains on dispositions of land parcels and our share of gains on dispositions of properties by unconsolidated real estate partnerships in 2007, as compared to net gains of $27.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, on the sale of parcels of land, interests in unconsolidated real estate properties and an interest in an unconsolidated joint venture that owned and operated several student housing properties.
27
Table of Contents
Income Tax Benefit
Certain of our operations, such as property management, asset management and risk management, are conducted through, and certain of our properties are owned by, Aimco’s taxable REIT subsidiaries, each of which we refer to as a TRS. A TRS is a C-corporation that has not elected REIT status and as such is subject to United States Federal corporate income tax. Aimco uses TRS entities to facilitate its ability to offer certain services and activities to its residents and investment partners, as these services and activities generally cannot be offered directly by Aimco. Aimco also uses TRS entities to hold investments in certain properties. Income taxes related to the results of continuing operations of our TRS entities are included in income tax benefit in our consolidated statements of income.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, income tax benefit increased by $33.5 million. This increase was primarily attributed to $36.1 million of income tax benefit recognized in 2008 related to the impairments of our Lincoln Place property and our investment in Casden Properties LLC, both of which are owned through TRS entities.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, income tax benefit increased by $8.7 million. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in losses from continuing operations of our TRS entities, due largely to favorable results from our self-insurance activities, which reduced losses of our TRS entities during 2006.
Minority Interest in Consolidated Real Estate Partnerships
Minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships reflects minority partners’ share of operating results of consolidated real estate partnerships. This generally includes the minority partners’ share of property management fees, interest on notes and other amounts eliminated in consolidation that we charge to such partnerships. However, we generally do not recognize a benefit for the minority interest share of partnership losses for partnerships that have deficits in partners’ equity.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships changed favorably by $20.9 million. The change includes a $9.1 million favorable change relating to the minority interest share of losses for real estate partnerships consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007, and the remainder relates to increases in the minority partners’ share of losses of our other consolidated real estate partnerships.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships changed favorably by $13.6 million. This change is primarily attributable to our revised accounting treatment for tax credit arrangements (seeTax Credit Arrangementsin Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8) which resulted in the reversal in 2006 of a previously recognized benefit of $9.0 million for losses of tax credit partnerships that were allocated to minority interests in prior years, but which are absorbed by us under our revised accounting treatment. This favorable change was in addition to an increase in the minority interest partners’ share of losses of other consolidated real estate partnerships.
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net
The results of operations for properties sold during the period or designated as held for sale at the end of the period are generally required to be classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The components of net earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include all property-related revenues and operating expenses, depreciation expense recognized prior to the classification as held for sale, property-specific interest expense and debt extinguishment gains and losses to the extent there is secured debt on the property, and any related minority interest. In addition, any impairment losses on assets held for sale and the net gain or loss on the eventual disposal of properties held for sale are reported in discontinued operations.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, income from discontinued operations, net totaled $594.4 million, $91.6 million and $251.1 million, respectively. The $502.8 million increase in income from discontinued operations from 2007 to 2008 was principally due to a $515.3 million increase in gain on dispositions of real estate, net of minority partners’ interest and income taxes, a $31.2 million decrease in interest expense and a $36.3 million increase in recovery of deficit distributions to minority partners, partially offset by a $39.4 million decrease in operating income, a $19.1 million increase in real estate impairment losses and a decrease of $22.8 million attributable to a 2007 gain on debt extinguishment related to eight properties in the VMS partnership. The $159.5 million decrease in income from discontinued operations from 2006 to 2007 was principally due to a $163.4 million decrease in gain on dispositions of real estate, net of minority partners’ interest and income taxes, a $16.6 million decrease in recovery of deficit distributions to minority partners, a $12.0 million decrease in operating income and a $5.3 million increase in real estate impairment losses, partially offset by a $21.7 decrease in interest expense and an increase of $22.8 million attributable to a 2007 gain on debt extinguishment related to eight properties in the VMS partnership.
28
Table of Contents
During 2008, we sold 151 consolidated properties, resulting in a net gain on sale of approximately $578.2 million (which is net of $40.0 million of related income taxes). Additionally, we recognized $24.0 million in impairment losses on assets sold or classified as held for sale in 2008 and $30.1 million of net recoveries of deficit distributions to minority partners. During 2007, we sold 73 consolidated properties, resulting in a net gain on sale of approximately $62.9 million (which is net of $2.1 million of related income taxes). Additionally, we recognized $4.9 million in impairment losses on assets sold or classified as held for sale in 2007 and $6.2 million of deficit distributions to minority partners. During 2006, we sold 77 consolidated properties and the South Tower of the Flamingo South Beach property, resulting in a net gain on sale of approximately $226.3 million (which is net of $32.6 million of related income taxes). Additionally, we recognized $0.4 million in impairment recoveries on assets sold in 2006 and $10.4 million of net recoveries of deficit distributions to minority partners. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, income from discontinued operations includes the operating results of the properties sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2008.
Changes in the level of gains recognized from period to period reflect the changing level of our disposition activity from period to period. Additionally, gains on properties sold are determined on an individual property basis or in the aggregate for a group of properties that are sold in a single transaction, and are not comparable period to period (see Note 13 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for additional information on discontinued operations).
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions. We believe that the following critical accounting policies involve our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Real estate and other long-lived assets to be held and used are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.
From time to time, we have non-revenue producing properties that we hold for future redevelopment. We assess the recoverability of the carrying amount of these redevelopment properties by comparing our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows based on the expected service potential of the redevelopment property upon completion to the carrying amount. In certain instances, we use a probability-weighted approach to determine our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows when alternative courses of action are under consideration. As discussed inProvision for Impairment Losses on Real Estate Development Assetswithin the preceding discussion of Results of Operations, during 2008 we recognized impairment losses on our Lincoln Place and Pacific Bay Vistas properties of $85.4 million ($55.6 million net of tax) and $5.7 million, respectively.
Real estate investments are subject to varying degrees of risk. Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of our real estate investments. These factors include:
• | the general economic climate; |
• | competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; |
• | local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments, that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; |
• | changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; |
• | increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; |
29
Table of Contents
• | changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multifamily housing; |
• | availability and cost of financing; |
• | changes in market capitalization rates; and |
• | the relative illiquidity of such investments. |
Any adverse changes in these and other factors could cause an impairment in our long-lived assets, including real estate and investments in unconsolidated real estate partnerships. In addition to the impairments of Lincoln Place and Pacific Bay Vistas discussed above and our investment in Casden Properties LLC discussed below, based on periodic tests of recoverability of long-lived assets, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we recorded net impairment losses of $5.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, related to properties to be held and used. For the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded net recoveries of previously recorded impairment losses of $0.8 million.
Notes Receivable and Interest Income Recognition
Notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships consist primarily of notes receivable from partnerships in which we are the general partner. Notes receivable from non-affiliates consist of notes receivable from unrelated third parties. The ultimate repayment of these notes is subject to a number of variables, including the performance and value of the underlying real estate and the claims of unaffiliated mortgage lenders. Our notes receivable include loans extended by us that we carry at the face amount plus accrued interest, which we refer to as “par value notes,” and loans extended by predecessors, some of whose positions we generally acquired at a discount, which we refer to as “discounted notes.”
We record interest income on par value notes as earned in accordance with the terms of the related loan agreements. We discontinue the accrual of interest on such notes when the notes are impaired, as discussed below, or when there is otherwise significant uncertainty as to the collection of interest. We record income on such nonaccrual loans using the cost recovery method, under which we apply cash receipts first to the recorded amount of the loan; thereafter, any additional receipts are recognized as income.
We recognize interest income on discounted notes receivable based upon whether the amount and timing of collections are both probable and reasonably estimable. We consider collections to be probable and reasonably estimable when the borrower has closed transactions or has entered into certain pending transactions (which include real estate sales, refinancings, foreclosures and rights offerings) that provide a reliable source of repayment. In such instances, we recognize accretion income, on a prospective basis using the effective interest method over the estimated remaining term of the loans, equal to the difference between the carrying amount of the discounted notes and the estimated collectible value. We record income on all other discounted notes using the cost recovery method. Accretion income recognized in any given period is based on our ability to complete transactions to monetize the notes receivable and the difference between the carrying value and the estimated collectible amount of the notes; therefore, accretion income varies on a period by period basis and could be lower or higher than in prior periods.
Allowance for Losses on Notes Receivable
We assess the collectibility of notes receivable on a periodic basis, which assessment consists primarily of an evaluation of cash flow projections of the borrower to determine whether estimated cash flows are sufficient to repay principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the note. We recognize impairments on notes receivable when it is probable that principal and interest will not be received in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. The amount of the impairment to be recognized generally is based on the fair value of the partnership’s real estate that represents the primary source of loan repayment. In certain instances where other sources of cash flow are available to repay the loan, the impairment is measured by discounting the estimated cash flows at the loan’s original effective interest rate.
During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 we recorded net provisions for losses on notes receivable of $4.2 million, $4.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively. We will continue to evaluate the collectibility of these notes, and we will adjust related allowances in the future due to changes in market conditions and other factors.
Additionally, as discussed inProvision for Impairment Losses on Real Estate Development Assetswithin the preceding discussion of Results of Operations, during 2008 we recognized an impairment loss of $16.3 million ($10.0 million net of tax) on our investment in Casden Properties LLC, which we account for as a note receivable.
30
Table of Contents
Capitalized Costs
We capitalize costs, including certain indirect costs, incurred in connection with our capital expenditure activities, including redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property improvements and replacements of existing property components. Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital expenditure activities at the property level. We characterize as “indirect costs” an allocation of certain department costs, including payroll, at the area operations and corporate levels that clearly relate to capital expenditure activities. We capitalize interest, property taxes and insurance during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress. We charge to expense as incurred costs that do not relate to capital expenditure activities, including ordinary repairs, maintenance, resident turnover costs and general and administrative expenses (seeCapital Expenditures and Related Depreciationin Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8).
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, for continuing and discontinued operations, we capitalized $25.7 million, $30.8 million and $24.7 million of interest costs, respectively, and $78.1 million, $78.1 million and $66.2 million of site payroll and indirect costs, respectively.
Funds From Operations
FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe, when considered with the financial statements determined in accordance with GAAP, is helpful to investors in understanding our performance because it captures features particular to real estate performance by recognizing that real estate generally appreciates over time or maintains residual value to a much greater extent than do other depreciable assets such as machinery, computers or other personal property. The Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, defines FFO as net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains from sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We compute FFO for all periods presented in accordance with the guidance set forth by NAREIT’s April 1, 2002, White Paper, which we refer to as the White Paper. We calculate FFO (diluted) by subtracting redemption or repurchase related preferred OP Unit issuance costs and distributions on preferred OP Units and adding back distributions on dilutive preferred securities, discounts on preferred OP Unit redemptions or repurchases and interest expense on dilutive mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred securities. FFO should not be considered an alternative to net income or net cash flows from operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP, as an indication of our performance or as a measure of liquidity. FFO is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund future cash needs. In addition, although FFO is a measure used for comparability in assessing the performance of real estate investment trusts, there can be no assurance that our basis for computing FFO is comparable with that of other real estate investment trusts.
31
Table of Contents
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, our FFO is calculated as follows (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders (1) | $ | 414,141 | $ | (39,027 | ) | $ | 106,537 | |||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (2) | 458,595 | 403,786 | 368,783 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization related to non-real estate assets | (18,012 | ) | (20,815 | ) | (22,898 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation of rental property related to minority partners and unconsolidated entities (3) (4) | (36,571 | ) | (22,277 | ) | 1,973 | |||||||
Depreciation of rental property related to minority partners’ interest — adjustment (5) | — | — | 7,377 | |||||||||
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other | (99,602 | ) | (32,061 | ) | (27,730 | ) | ||||||
Income tax arising from disposition of unconsolidated real estate and other | (433 | ) | (17 | ) | — | |||||||
Gain on dispositions of non-depreciable assets and debt extinguishment gain | 1,670 | 26,702 | 11,526 | |||||||||
Deficit distributions to minority partners (6) | 25,984 | 32,599 | 15,519 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations: | ||||||||||||
Gain on dispositions of real estate, net of minority partners’ interest (3) | (618,168 | ) | (65,076 | ) | (258,970 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation of rental property, net of minority partners’ interest (3) (4) | 50,786 | 65,334 | 107,545 | |||||||||
Deficit distributions (recovery of deficit distributions) to minority partners,net (6) | (30,127 | ) | 6,161 | (10,441 | ) | |||||||
Income tax arising from disposals | 43,146 | 2,135 | 32,918 | |||||||||
Preferred OP Unit distributions | 62,836 | 70,509 | 83,679 | |||||||||
Preferred OP Unit redemption related (gains) costs | (1,482 | ) | 2,635 | 6,848 | ||||||||
Funds From Operations | $ | 252,763 | $ | 430,588 | $ | 422,666 | ||||||
Preferred OP Unit distributions | (62,836 | ) | (70,509 | ) | (83,679 | ) | ||||||
Preferred OP Unit redemption related gains (costs) | 1,482 | (2,635 | ) | (6,848 | ) | |||||||
Distributions on dilutive preferred securities | 5,309 | 1,875 | 2,444 | |||||||||
Funds From Operations attributable to common unitholders — diluted | $ | 196,718 | $ | 359,319 | $ | 334,583 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common unit, common unit equivalents and dilutive preferred securities outstanding (8): | ||||||||||||
Common units and equivalents (7) (9) | 131,231 | 153,054 | 154,683 | |||||||||
Dilutive preferred securities | 2,524 | 856 | 2,627 | |||||||||
Total | 133,755 | 153,910 | 157,310 | |||||||||
Notes: | ||
(1) | Represents the numerator for earnings per common unit, calculated in accordance with GAAP. | |
(2) | Includes amortization of management contracts where we are the general partner. Such management contracts were established in certain instances where we acquired a general partner interest in either a consolidated or an unconsolidated partnership. Because the recoverability of these management contracts depends primarily on the operations of the real estate owned by the limited partnerships, we believe it is consistent with the White Paper to add back such amortization, as the White Paper directs the add-back of amortization of assets uniquely significant to the real estate industry. | |
(3) | “Minority partners’ interest,” means minority interest in our consolidated real estate partnerships. | |
(4) | Adjustments related to minority partners’ share of depreciation of rental property for the year ended December 31, 2007, include the subtraction of $15.1 million and $17.8 million for continuing operations and discontinued operations, respectively, related to the VMS debt extinguishment gains (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8). These subtractions are required because we added back the minority partners’ share of depreciation related to rental property in determining FFO in prior periods. Accordingly, the net effect of the VMS debt extinguishment gains on our FFO for the year ended December 31, 2007, was an increase of $9.3 million. | |
(5) | Represents prior period depreciation of certain tax credit redevelopment properties that Aimco included in an adjustment to minority interest in real estate partnerships for the year ended December 31, 2006 (seeTax Credit Arrangementsin Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8). This prior period depreciation is added back to determine FFO in accordance with the NAREIT White Paper. | |
(6) | In accordance with GAAP, deficit distributions to minority partners are charges recognized in our income statement when cash is distributed to a non-controlling partner in a consolidated partnership in excess of the positive balance in such partner’s capital account, which is classified as minority interest on our balance sheet. We record these charges for GAAP purposes even though there is no economic effect or cost. Deficit distributions to minority partners occur when the fair value of the underlying real estate exceeds its depreciated net book value because the underlying real estate has appreciated or maintained its value. As a result, the recognition of expense for deficit distributions to minority partners represents, in substance, either (a) our recognition of depreciation previously allocated to the non-controlling partner or (b) a payment related to the non-controlling partner’s share of real estate appreciation. Based on White Paper guidance that requires real estate depreciation and gains to be excluded from FFO, we add back deficit distributions and subtract related recoveries in our reconciliation of net income to FFO. |
32
Table of Contents
(7) | During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we had 7,191,199, 7,367,440 and 7,853,174 common OP Units outstanding and 2,367,629, 2,379,084 and 2,379,084 High Performance Units outstanding. | |
(8) | Weighted average common units, common unit equivalents and dilutive preferred securities amounts for the periods presented have been retroactively adjusted for the effect of common OP Units issued to Aimco in connection with the special distributions paid during 2008 and in January 2009, which are further discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8. | |
(9) | Represents the denominator for earnings per common unit — diluted, calculated in accordance with GAAP, plus additional common OP Unit equivalents that are dilutive for FFO. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial obligations. Our primary source of liquidity is cash flow from our operations. Additional sources are proceeds from property sales and proceeds from refinancings of existing mortgage loans and borrowings under new mortgage loans.
Our principal uses for liquidity include normal operating activities, payments of principal and interest on outstanding debt, capital expenditures, distributions paid to unitholders and distributions paid to partners, repurchases of common OP Units from Aimco in connection with Aimco’s concurrent repurchase of its Class A Common Stock, and acquisitions of, and investments in, properties. We use our cash and cash equivalents and our cash provided by operating activities to meet short-term liquidity needs. In the event that our cash and cash equivalents and cash provided by operating activities are not sufficient to cover our short-term liquidity demands, we have additional means, such as short-term borrowing availability and proceeds from property sales and refinancings, to help us meet our short-term liquidity demands. We may use our revolving credit facility for general corporate purposes and to fund investments on an interim basis. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, such as debt maturities and property acquisitions, through long-term borrowings, both secured and unsecured, the issuance of debt or equity securities (including OP Units), the sale of properties and cash generated from operations.
The current state of credit markets and related effect on the overall economy may have an adverse affect on our liquidity, both through increases in interest rates and credit risk spreads, and access to financing. As further discussed in Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, we are subject to interest rate risk associated with certain variable rate liabilities, preferred stock and assets. Based on our net variable rate liabilities, preferred OP Units and assets outstanding at December 31, 2008, we estimate that a 1.0 % increase in 30-day LIBOR with constant credit risk spreads would reduce our income attributable to common unitholders by approximately $4.6 million on an annual basis. From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008, both the SIFMA (previously the Bond Market Association index) and 30-day LIBOR rates, the predominant interest rates to which our variable rate debt obligations are indexed, decreased, with the SIFMA rate decreasing from 3.06% to 1.25% and the 30-day LIBOR rate decreasing from 4.57% to 0.45%. Although base interest rates have decreased, the tightening of credit markets has affected the credit risk spreads charged over base interest rates on, and the availability of, mortgage loan financing. For future refinancing activities, our liquidity and cost of funds may be affected by increases in base interest rates or higher credit risk spreads. If timely property financing options are not available for maturing debt, we may consider alternative sources of liquidity, such as reductions in certain capital spending or proceeds from asset dispositions.
From time to time, we enter into total rate of return swaps on various fixed rate secured tax-exempt bonds payable and fixed rate notes payable to convert these borrowings from a fixed rate to a variable rate and provide an efficient financing product to lower our cost of borrowing. In exchange for our receipt of a fixed rate generally equal to the underlying borrowing’s interest rate, the total rate of return swaps require that we pay a variable rate, equivalent to the SIFMA rate for tax-exempt bonds payable and the 30-day LIBOR rate for notes payable, plus a credit risk spread. These swaps generally have a second or third lien on the property collateralized by the related borrowings and the obligations under certain of these swaps are cross-collateralized with certain of the other swaps with a particular counterparty. The total rate of return swaps require specified loan-to-value ratios. In the event the values of the real estate properties serving as collateral under these agreements decline, we may be required to provide additional collateral pursuant to the swap agreements, which would adversely affect our cash flows. The underlying borrowings are generally callable at our option, with no prepayment penalty, with 30 days advance notice, and the swaps generally have a term of less than five years. At December 31, 2008, we had total rate of return swap positions with two financial institutions totaling $422.1 million and had provided $3.2 million in cash collateral pursuant to the swap agreements to satisfy the loan-to-value ratio requirements.
The total rate of return swaps have a contractually defined termination value generally equal to the difference between the fair value and the counterparty’s purchased value of the underlying borrowings (which is typically par value or contract value), which may require payment by us if the fair value is less than the purchased value, or to us if the fair value exceeds the purchased value. In the event we are unable to extend the arrangements at their maturities, the counterparty, who is also the creditor on the related borrowings, may desire to sell the borrowings. If the counterparty’s purchased value of the underlying borrowings exceeds the fair value of the underlying borrowings at the date of the swap maturities, we may elect to purchase the borrowings at counterparty’s purchased value to avoid incurring a termination payment under the swap arrangements. In such event, we would be required to refinance the borrowings or find other sources of liquidity to repay the borrowings.
We periodically evaluate counterparty credit risk associated with these arrangements. At the current time, we have concluded we do not have material exposure. In the event a counterparty were to default under these arrangements, loss of the net interest benefit we generally receive under these arrangements, which is equal to the difference between the fixed rate we receive and the variable rate we pay, may adversely affect our operating cash flows. SeeDerivative Financial Instrumentsin Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for additional discussion of these arrangements, including the current swap maturity dates.
33
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2008, the amount available under our revolving credit facility was $578.8 million. For the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2010, we have non-recourse property debt maturities of $288.0 million and $284.7 million, respectively, at an average estimated loan-to-value of approximately 52% and 51%, respectively. Our total outstanding unsecured term debt of $400.0 million at December 31, 2008, matures in March 2011. In January 2009, we prepaid $50.0 million of the balance outstanding on the unsecured term debt. Additionally, we have limited obligations to fund redevelopment commitments during the year ending December 31, 2009, and no development commitments.
At December 31, 2008, we had $299.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, an increase of $89.2 million from December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2008, we had $258.3 million of restricted cash, primarily consisting of reserves and escrows held by lenders for bond sinking funds, capital expenditures, property taxes and insurance. In addition, cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are held by partnerships that are not presented on a consolidated basis. The following discussion relates to changes in cash due to operating, investing and financing activities, which are presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows in Item 8.
Operating Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2008, our net cash provided by operating activities of $421.5 million was primarily from operating income from our consolidated properties, which is affected primarily by rental rates, occupancy levels and operating expenses related to our portfolio of properties. Cash provided by operating activities decreased $44.1 million compared with the year ended December 31, 2007, driven primarily by a $48.3 million decrease in operating income of our consolidated properties, including those classified in discontinued operations, which was attributable to property sales in 2008 and 2007.
Investing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2008, our net cash provided by investing activities of $1.3 billion consisted primarily of proceeds from disposition of real estate and interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships, partially offset by capital expenditures and purchases of real estate.
Although we hold all of our properties for investment, we sell properties when they do not meet our investment criteria or are located in areas that we believe do not justify our continued investment when compared to alternative uses for our capital. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we sold 151 consolidated properties. These properties were sold for an aggregate sales price of $2.4 billion and generated proceeds totaling $2.3 billion, after the payment of transaction costs and debt prepayment penalties. The $2.3 billion in proceeds is inclusive of promote income which is generated by the disposition of properties owned by our consolidated joint ventures, debt assumed by buyers and sales proceeds placed into escrows for tax-free exchanges and other purposes, all of which are excluded from proceeds from disposition of real estate in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Sales proceeds were used to repay property debt, repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility, repurchase common OP Units from Aimco in connection with Aimco’s concurrent repurchases of Class A Common Stock and preferred stock and for other corporate purposes.
Our portfolio management strategy includes property acquisitions and dispositions to concentrate our portfolio in our target markets. We are currently marketing for sale certain properties that are inconsistent with this long-term investment strategy. Additionally, from time to time, we may market certain properties that are consistent with this strategy but offer attractive returns. We plan to use our share of the net proceeds from such dispositions to reduce debt, fund capital expenditures on existing assets, fund acquisitions, and for other operating needs and corporate purposes.
Capital Expenditures
We classify all capital spending as Capital Replacements (which we refer to as CR), Capital Improvements (which we refer to as CI), casualties, redevelopment or entitlement. Expenditures other than casualty, redevelopment and entitlement capital expenditures are apportioned between CR and CI based on the useful life of the capital item under consideration and the period we have owned the property.
34
Table of Contents
CR represents the share of capital expenditures that are deemed to replace the portion of acquired capital assets that was consumed during the period we have owned the asset. CI represents the share of expenditures that are made to enhance the value, profitability or useful life of an asset as compared to its original purchase condition. CR and CI exclude capital expenditures for casualties, redevelopment and entitlements. Casualty expenditures represent capitalized costs incurred in connection with casualty losses and are associated with the restoration of the asset. A portion of the restoration costs may be reimbursed by insurance carriers subject to deductibles associated with each loss. Redevelopment expenditures represent expenditures that substantially upgrade the property. Entitlement expenditures represent costs incurred in connection with obtaining local governmental approvals to increase density and add residential units to a site. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we spent a total of $101.4 million, $124.9 million, $22.8 million, $340.3 million and $24.2 million on CR, CI, casualties, redevelopment and entitlement, respectively.
The table below details our share of actual spending, on both consolidated and unconsolidated real estate partnerships, for CR, CI, casualties, redevelopment and entitlements for the year ended December 31, 2008, on a per unit and total dollar basis. Per unit numbers for CR and CI are based on approximately 126,834 average units for the year, including 109,956 conventional units and 16,879 affordable units. Average units are weighted for the portion of the period that we owned an interest in the property, represent ownership-adjusted effective units, and exclude non-managed units. Total capital expenditures are reconciled to our consolidated statement of cash flows for the same period (in thousands, except per unit amounts).
Aimco’s | Per | |||||||||||
Share of | Effective | |||||||||||
Expenditures | Unit | |||||||||||
Capital Replacements Detail: | ||||||||||||
Building and grounds | $ | 40,516 | $ | 319 | ||||||||
Turnover related | 45,724 | 361 | ||||||||||
Capitalized site payroll and indirect costs | 15,128 | 119 | ||||||||||
Our share of Capital Replacements | $ | 101,368 | $ | 799 | ||||||||
Capital Replacements: | ||||||||||||
Conventional | $ | 94,574 | $ | 860 | ||||||||
Affordable | 6,794 | $ | 403 | |||||||||
Our share of Capital Replacements | 101,368 | $ | 799 | |||||||||
Capital Improvements: | ||||||||||||
Conventional | 113,870 | $ | 1,036 | |||||||||
Affordable | 11,016 | $ | 653 | |||||||||
Our share of Capital Improvements | 124,886 | $ | 985 | |||||||||
Casualties (1): | ||||||||||||
Conventional | 21,228 | |||||||||||
Affordable | 1,615 | |||||||||||
Our share of casualties | 22,843 | |||||||||||
Redevelopment: | ||||||||||||
Conventional projects | 226,307 | |||||||||||
Tax credit projects | 113,945 | |||||||||||
Our share of redevelopment | 340,252 | |||||||||||
Entitlement | 24,156 | |||||||||||
Our share of capital expenditures | 613,505 | |||||||||||
Plus minority partners’ share of consolidated spending | 52,504 | |||||||||||
Less our share of unconsolidated spending | (776 | ) | ||||||||||
Total capital expenditures per consolidated statement of cash flows | $ | 665,233 | ||||||||||
(1) | Casualties for the year ended December 31, 2008, reflect the portion of the anticipated spending related to Tropical Storm Fay and Hurricane Ike incurred as of December 31, 2008. |
Included in the above spending for CI, casualties, redevelopment and entitlement, was approximately $63.1 million of our share of capitalized site payroll and indirect costs related to these activities for the year ended December 31, 2008.
35
Table of Contents
We funded all of the above capital expenditures with cash provided by operating activities, working capital and property sales as discussed below.
Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash used in financing activities of $1.7 billion was primarily attributed to debt principal payments, redemption of common OP Units, distributions to minority interests, payment of common and preferred distributions, repurchases of common OP Units from Aimco in connection with Aimco’s concurrent repurchase of its Class A Common Stock, and repurchases of preferred OP Units. Proceeds from property loans and tax-exempt bond financing partially offset the cash outflows.
Mortgage Debt
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had $6.3 billion and $7.0 billion, respectively, in consolidated mortgage debt outstanding, which included $52.0 million and $1.1 billion, respectively, of mortgage debt classified within liabilities related to assets held for sale. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we refinanced or closed mortgage loans on 71 properties (including one unconsolidated property) generating $962.2 million of proceeds from borrowings with a weighted average interest rate of 5.51%. Our share of the net proceeds after repayment of existing debt, payment of transaction costs and distributions to limited partners, was $430.9 million. We used these total net proceeds for capital expenditures and other corporate purposes. We intend to continue to refinance mortgage debt primarily as a means of extending current and near term maturities.
Term Loans and Credit Facility
We have an Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions, which we refer to as the Credit Agreement. In September 2008, we entered into a fifth amendment to the Credit Facility that modifies certain provisions related to letters of credit.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we repaid in full our $75.0 million term loan which was due for payment in September 2009. Following this repayment, the aggregate amount of commitments and loans under the Credit Agreement is $1.035 billion, comprised of a $400.0 million term loan and $635.0 million of revolving loan commitments. The $635.0 million of revolving loan commitments is after the elimination of a $15.0 million commitment held by Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. The $400.0 million term loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.5%, or at our option, a base rate equal to the prime rate, and matures March 2011. Our revolving credit facility matures May 2009, and may be extended for an additional year, subject to a 20.0 basis point fee on the total commitments. Borrowings under the revolver bear interest based on a pricing grid determined by leverage (currently at LIBOR plus 1.125%).
At December 31, 2008, the term loan had an outstanding principal balance of $400.0 million and a weighted average interest rate of 2.94%. In January 2009, we prepaid $50.0 million of the outstanding balance on the term debt. The amount available under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2008, was $578.8 million (after giving effect to $56.2 million outstanding for undrawn letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facility). The proceeds of revolving loans are generally permitted to be used to fund working capital and for other corporate purposes.
Fair Value Measurements
We enter into total rate of return swaps on various fixed rate secured tax-exempt bonds payable and fixed rate notes payable to convert these borrowings from a fixed rate to a variable rate and provide an efficient financing product to lower our cost of borrowing. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, or SFAS 133, we designate total rate of return swaps as hedges of the risk of overall changes in the fair value of the underlying borrowings. At each reporting period, we estimate the fair value of these borrowings and the total rate of return swaps and recognize any changes therein as an adjustment of interest expense.
Our method used to calculate the fair value of the total rate of return swaps generally results in changes in fair value that are equal to the changes in fair value of the related borrowings, which is consistent with our hedging strategy. We believe that these financial instruments are highly effective in offsetting the changes in fair value of the related borrowings during the hedging period, and accordingly, changes in the fair value of these instruments have no material impact on our liquidity, results of operations or capital resources.
36
Table of Contents
During the year ended December 31, 2008, changes in the fair values of these financial instruments resulted in decreases of $20.1 million in the carrying amount of the hedged borrowings and equal increases in accrued liabilities and other for total rate of return swaps. At December 31, 2008, the cumulative recognized changes in the fair value of these financial instruments resulted in a $29.5 million reduction in the carrying amount of the hedged borrowings offset by an equal increase in accrued liabilities and other for total rate of return swaps. The current and cumulative decreases in the fair values of the hedged borrowings and related swaps reflect the recent uncertainty in the credit markets which has decreased demand and increased pricing for similar debt instruments.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we received net cash receipts of $16.7 million under the total return swaps, which positively impacted our liquidity. To the extent interest rates increase above the fixed rates on the underlying borrowings, our obligations under the total return swaps will negatively affect our liquidity. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we provided $3.2 million of cash collateral to satisfy certain loan-to-value requirements under the total rate of return swap agreements, which negatively affected our liquidity. In the event the values of the real estate properties serving as collateral under these agreements decline, we may be required to provide additional collateral pursuant to the swap agreements, which would adversely affect our liquidity.
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for more information on our total rate of return swaps and related borrowings.
Partners’ Capital Transactions
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we paid cash distributions totaling $62.7 million and $267.4 million to preferred and common unitholders, respectively, and $18.8 million to holders of High Performance Units. Additionally, pursuant to the special distributions discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8, during the year ended December 31, 2008, based on stockholder elections, Aimco paid $489.8 million of its special dividends through the issuance of approximately 22.9 million shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. In connection with Aimco’s special dividends, we made a distribution to Aimco of common OP Units equal to the number of shares issued pursuant to its special dividends.
During September 2008, Aimco repurchased 54 shares, or $27.0 million in liquidation preference, of its Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, for cash totaling $24.8 million. Concurrent with this repurchase, we repurchased from Aimco an equivalent number of outstanding Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Partnership Preferred Units.
In April 2008, we and Aimco filed a new shelf registration statement to replace the existing shelf (which was due to expire later in 2008) that provides for the issuance of debt securities by us and debt and equity securities by Aimco.
Aimco’s board of directors has, from time to time, authorized Aimco to repurchase shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. Concurrent with Aimco’s repurchase of a corresponding number of shares of its Class A Common Stock, we repurchased from Aimco approximately 13.9 million common OP Units (19.3 million common OP Units after the effect of the special distributions) for approximately $473.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2008, Aimco was authorized to repurchase approximately 19.3 million additional shares of its Class A Common Stock under an authorization that has no expiration date. Aimco’s future repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. In the event of any repurchases of shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock by Aimco, it is expected that we would repurchase an equal number of common OP Units owned by Aimco.
37
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
This table summarizes information contained elsewhere in this Annual Report regarding payments due under contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2008 (amounts in thousands):
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | One Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||
Scheduled long-term debt maturities | $ | 6,377,121 | $ | 407,893 | $ | 718,724 | $ | 1,094,021 | $ | 4,156,483 | ||||||||||
Term loan (1) | 400,000 | — | 400,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Redevelopment and other construction commitments | 70,279 | 68,752 | 1,527 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Leases for space occupied (2) | 31,935 | 7,904 | 12,316 | 7,622 | 4,093 | |||||||||||||||
Other obligations (3) | 5,595 | 5,595 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 6,884,930 | $ | 490,144 | $ | 1,132,567 | $ | 1,101,643 | $ | 4,160,576 | ||||||||||
(1) | After payment of $50.0 million in January 2009, the term loan had an outstanding balance of $350.0 million. | |
(2) | Inclusive of leased space that has been abandoned as part of our organizational restructuring in 2008 (seeRestructuring Costsin Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8). | |
(3) | Represents a commitment to fund $5.6 million in second mortgage loans on certain properties in West Harlem, New York City. |
In addition, we may enter into commitments to purchase goods and services in connection with the operations of our properties. Those commitments generally have terms of one year or less and reflect expenditure levels comparable to our historical expenditures.
Future Capital Needs
In addition to the items set forth in “Contractual Obligations” above, we expect to fund any future acquisitions, additional redevelopment projects, capital improvements and capital replacement principally with proceeds from property sales (including tax-free exchange proceeds), short-term borrowings, debt and equity financing (including tax credit equity) and operating cash flows.
In 2009, inclusive of the redevelopment commitments discussed in Contractual Obligations above, we expect to invest between $50.0 and $75.0 million in conventional redevelopment projects and between $30.0 and $45.0 million in affordable redevelopment projects, predominantly funded by third-party tax credit equity.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We own general and limited partner interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships, in which our total ownership interests range typically from less than 1% up to 50%. However, based on the provisions of the relevant partnership agreements, we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary or to have control of these partnerships sufficient to require or permit consolidation for accounting purposes (see Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8). There are no lines of credit, side agreements, or any other derivative financial instruments related to or between our unconsolidated real estate partnerships and us and no material exposure to financial guarantees. Accordingly, our maximum risk of loss related to these unconsolidated real estate partnerships is limited to the aggregate carrying amount of our investment in the unconsolidated real estate partnerships and any outstanding notes receivable as reported in our consolidated financial statements (see Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for additional information about our investments in unconsolidated real estate partnerships).
38
Table of Contents
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our primary market risk exposure relates to changes in base interest rates, mortgage spreads and availability of credit. We are not subject to any foreign currency exchange rate risk or commodity price risk, or any other material market rate or price risks. We use predominantly long-term, fixed-rate non-recourse mortgage debt in order to avoid the refunding and repricing risks of short-term borrowings. We use short-term debt financing and working capital primarily to fund short-term uses and acquisitions and generally expect to refinance such borrowings with cash from operating activities, property sales proceeds, long-term debt or equity financings. We use total rate-of-return swaps to obtain the benefit of variable rates on certain of our fixed rate debt instruments. We make limited use of other derivative financial instruments and we do not use them for trading or other speculative purposes.
We had $1,309.5 million of floating rate debt and $73.0 million of floating rate preferred OP Units outstanding at December 31, 2008. Of the total floating rate debt, the major components were floating rate tax-exempt bond financing ($563.4 million), floating rate secured notes ($335.6 million) and a term loan ($400.0 million). At December 31, 2008, we had approximately $717.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and notes receivable, the majority of which bear interest. We also had approximately $127.3 million of variable rate debt associated with our redevelopment activities, for which we capitalize a portion of the interest expense. The effect of our interest bearing assets and of capitalizing interest on variable rate debt associated with our redevelopment activities would partially reduce the effect of an increase in variable interest rates. Historically, changes in tax-exempt interest rates have been at a ratio of less than 1:1 with changes in taxable interest rates. Floating rate tax-exempt bond financing is benchmarked against the SIFMA rate (previously the Bond Market Association index), which since 1989 has averaged 69% of the 30-day LIBOR rate. If this historical relationship continues, on an annual basis, we estimate that an increase in 30-day LIBOR of 1.0% (0.69% in tax-exempt interest rates) with constant credit risk spreads would result in our income before minority interests being reduced by $3.1 million and our income attributable to common unitholders being reduced by $4.3 million.
We estimate the fair value for our debt instruments using present value techniques that include income and market valuation approaches with market rates for debt with the same or similar terms. Present value calculations vary depending on the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In many cases, the fair value estimates may not be realizable in immediate settlement of the instruments. The estimated aggregate fair value of our consolidated debt (including amounts reported in liabilities related to assets held for sale) was approximately $6.7 billion and $7.6 billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The combined carrying value of our consolidated debt (including amounts reported in liabilities related to assets held for sale) was approximately $6.8 billion and $7.5 billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. See Note 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further details on our consolidated debt. Refer toDerivative Financial Instruments in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further discussion regarding certain of our fixed rate debt that is subject to total rate of return swap instruments. If market rates for our fixed-rate debt were higher by 1.0% with constant credit risk spreads, the estimated fair value of our debt discussed above would have decreased from $6.7 billion to $6.4 billion. If market rates for our debt discussed above were lower by 1.0% with constant credit risk spreads, the estimated fair value of our fixed-rate debt would have increased from $6.7 billion to $6.9 billion.
At December 31, 2008, we had swap positions with two financial institutions totaling $422.1 million. The related swap agreements provide for collateral calls to maintain specified loan-to-value ratios, pursuant to which we had provided $3.2 million of collateral as of December 31, 2008. In the event the values of the real estate properties serving as collateral under these agreements decline, we may be required to provide additional collateral pursuant to the swap agreements, which would adversely affect our cash flows.
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The independent registered public accounting firm’s report, consolidated financial statements and schedule listed in the accompanying index are filed as part of this report and incorporated herein by this reference. See “Index to Financial Statements” on page F-1 of this Annual Report.
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
39
Table of Contents
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the General Partner have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Partnership is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the General Partner’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the General Partner’s board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
• | pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership; |
• | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the General Partner’s management and directors of the Partnership; and |
• | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control-Integrated Framework.
Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
The Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
40
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Partners
AIMCO Properties, L.P.
AIMCO Properties, L.P.
We have audited AIMCO Properties, L.P.’s (the “Partnership”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Partnership as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, and our report dated February 26, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
Denver, Colorado
February 26, 2009
February 26, 2009
41
Table of Contents
Item 9B.Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The officers of Aimco are also the officers of the General Partner and hold the same titles. The information required by this item is presented under the captions “Board of Directors and Executive Officers” and “Corporate Governance Matters — Code of Ethics” in the proxy statement for Aimco’s 2009 annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. The board of directors of the General Partner consists of Terry Considine and Thomas M. Herzog, and the information with respect to Messrs. Considine and Herzog is incorporated herein by reference.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance. Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the General Partner’s executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of OP Units, to file reports (Forms 3, 4 and 5) of unit ownership and changes in unit ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Executive officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of OP Units are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all such forms that they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and the amendments thereto received by us for the year ended December 31, 2008, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required to be filed by those persons, we believe that during the period ended December 31, 2008, all filing requirements were complied with by the General Partner’s executive officers and directors and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of OP Units.
Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The board of directors of the General Partner does not have a separate audit committee or nominating and corporate governance committee. Based on the structure of the Partnership and its relationship to Aimco, which has a separate audit committee and nominating and corporate governance committee, committees are not warranted for the Partnership. The audit committee of Aimco’s board of directors makes determinations concerning the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for Aimco and its subsidiaries, including the Partnership. In addition, the Aimco audit committee reviews with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, reviews the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, considers the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviews the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting. The Aimco audit committee currently consists of James N. Bailey, Richard S. Ellwood, Thomas L. Keltner, J. Landis Martin, Robert A. Miller, Thomas L. Rhodes and Michael A. Stein. Aimco’s board of directors has determined that Michael A. Stein is an “audit committee financial expert.” Aimco’s board of directors has also determined that each member of the audit committee is independent, as that term is defined by Section 303A of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange relating to audit committees.
Item 11.Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is presented under the captions “Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” “Compensation and Human Resources Committee Report to Stockholders,” “Summary Compensation Table,” “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2008,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2008,” “Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2008” and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” in the proxy statement for Aimco’s 2009 annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. The directors of the General Partner do not receive additional compensation for serving as directors.
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item is presented under the captions “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” in the proxy statement for Aimco’s 2009 annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. The board of directors of the General Partner consists of Messrs. Considine and Herzog, and the information with respect to Messrs. Considine and Herzog is incorporated herein by reference. As of February 25, 2009, AIMCO-LP Trust held approximately 92% of the common OP Units and equivalents outstanding.
42
Table of Contents
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item is presented under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the proxy statement for Aimco’s 2009 annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. The directors of the General Partner are not independent.
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item is presented under the caption “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in the proxy statement for Aimco’s 2009 annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
43
Table of Contents
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) | The financial statements listed in the Index to Financial Statements on Page F-1 of this report are filed as part of this report and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(a)(2) | The financial statement schedule listed in the Index to Financial Statements on Page F-1 of this report is filed as part of this report and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(a)(3) | The Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference. |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS (1) (2)
EXHIBIT NO. | DESCRIPTION | |||
10.1 | Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties, L.P., dated as of July 29, 1994, as amended and restated as of February 28, 2007 (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.2 | First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties, L.P., dated as of December 31, 2007 (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 31, 2007, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.3 | Amended and Restated Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2004, by and among Aimco, AIMCO Properties, L.P., AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., and NHP Management Company as the borrowers and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association, and the Lenders listed therein (Exhibit 4.1 to Aimco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.4 | First Amendment to Amended and Restated Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2005, by and among Aimco, AIMCO Properties, L.P., AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., and NHP Management Company as the borrowers and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association, and the Lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.5 | Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2006, by and among Aimco, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., as the borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association, and the lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 10-K, dated March 22, 2006, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.6 | Third Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2007, by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 31, 2007, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.7 | Fourth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2007, by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 14, 2007, is incorporated herein by this reference) |
44
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT NO. | DESCRIPTION | |||
10.8 | Fifth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2008, by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 11, 2008, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.9 | Master Indemnification Agreement, dated December 3, 2001, by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., XYZ Holdings LLC, and the other parties signatory thereto (Exhibit 2.3 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 6, 2001, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.10 | Tax Indemnification and Contest Agreement, dated December 3, 2001, by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, National Partnership Investments, Corp., and XYZ Holdings LLC and the other parties signatory thereto (Exhibit 2.4 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 6, 2001, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.11 | Limited Liability Company Agreement of AIMCO JV Portfolio #1, LLC dated as of December 30, 2003 by and among AIMCO BRE I, LLC, AIMCO BRE II, LLC and SRV-AJVP#1, LLC (Exhibit 10.54 to Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.12 | Employment Contract executed on December 29, 2008, by and between AIMCO Properties, L.P. and Terry Considine (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 29, 2008, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.13 | Apartment Investment and Management Company 1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (October 1999) (Exhibit 10.26 to Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.14 | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan) (Exhibit 10.11 to Aimco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1997, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.15 | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan) (Exhibit 10.42 to Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.16 | 2007 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Aimco’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2007)* | |||
10.17 | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Exhibit 10.2 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 30, 2007, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.18 | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.3 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 30, 2007, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.19 | 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to Aimco’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2007)* | |||
21.1 | List of Subsidiaries | |||
23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||
32.1 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
45
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT NO. | DESCRIPTION | |||
32.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||
99.1 | Agreement re: disclosure of long-term debt instruments |
(1) | Schedule and supplemental materials to the exhibits have been omitted but will be provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. | |
(2) | The file reference number for all exhibits is 001-13232, and all such exhibits remain available pursuant to the Records Control Schedule of the Securities and Exchange Commission. | |
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
46
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P. | ||||||
By: AIMCO-GP, Inc., its General Partner | ||||||
By: | /s/ TERRY CONSIDINE | |||||
Chairman of the Board and | ||||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
Date: February 27, 2009 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ TERRY CONSIDINE | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the registrant’s general partner (principal executive officer) | February 27, 2009 | ||
/s/ THOMAS M. HERZOG | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant’s general partner (principal financial officer) | February 27, 2009 | ||
/s/ PAUL BELDIN | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the registrant’s general partner (principal accounting officer) | February 27, 2009 |
47
Table of Contents
(this page intentionally left blank)
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
Financial Statements: | ||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
F-5 | ||||
F-6 | ||||
F-8 | ||||
Financial Statement Schedule: | ||||
F-50 | ||||
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto. |
F-1
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Partners
AIMCO Properties, L.P.
AIMCO Properties, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AIMCO Properties, L.P. (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, partners’ capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying Index to Financial Statements. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Partnership at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 26, 2009
February 26, 2009
F-2
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007
(In thousands)
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||
Buildings and improvements | $ | 8,552,635 | $ | 7,893,171 | ||||
Land | 2,332,457 | 2,355,103 | ||||||
Total real estate | 10,885,092 | 10,248,274 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (2,782,219 | ) | (2,360,727 | ) | ||||
Net real estate | 8,102,873 | 7,887,547 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 299,676 | 210,461 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 258,303 | 313,694 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 89,132 | 71,463 | ||||||
Accounts receivable from affiliates, net | 33,536 | 34,958 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net | 59,473 | 65,888 | ||||||
Notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships, net | 22,567 | 35,186 | ||||||
Notes receivable from non-affiliates, net | 136,633 | 143,054 | ||||||
Notes receivable from Aimco | 15,551 | 14,765 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated real estate partnerships | 108,181 | 116,086 | ||||||
Other assets | 196,597 | 207,783 | ||||||
Deferred income tax assets, net | 28,326 | 14,426 | ||||||
Assets held for sale | 67,160 | 1,505,286 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 9,418,008 | $ | 10,620,597 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | ||||||||
Property tax-exempt bond financing | $ | 721,971 | $ | 756,442 | ||||
Property loans payable | 5,559,169 | 5,096,473 | ||||||
Term loans | 400,000 | 475,000 | ||||||
Other borrowings | 95,981 | 75,057 | ||||||
Total indebtedness | 6,777,121 | 6,402,972 | ||||||
Accounts payable | 64,241 | 65,235 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities and other | 411,114 | 441,042 | ||||||
Deferred income | 195,997 | 200,199 | ||||||
Security deposits | 43,277 | 41,141 | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale | 56,341 | 1,151,198 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 7,548,091 | 8,301,787 | ||||||
Minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships | 349,532 | 442,804 | ||||||
Redeemable preferred units (Note 11) | 85,245 | — | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) | ||||||||
Partners’ capital: | ||||||||
Preferred units | 689,026 | 803,593 | ||||||
General Partner and Special Limited Partner | 708,386 | 853,615 | ||||||
Limited Partners | 82,461 | 253,652 | ||||||
High Performance Units | (39,624 | ) | (28,703 | ) | ||||
Investment in Aimco Class A Common Stock | (5,109 | ) | (6,151 | ) | ||||
Total partners’ capital | 1,435,140 | 1,876,006 | ||||||
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ | 9,418,008 | $ | 10,620,597 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(In thousands, except per unit data)
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
REVENUES: | ||||||||||||
Rental and other property revenues | $ | 1,350,950 | $ | 1,296,142 | $ | 1,212,958 | ||||||
Property management revenues, primarily from affiliates | 6,345 | 6,923 | 12,312 | |||||||||
Asset management and tax credit revenues | 100,623 | 73,755 | 48,893 | |||||||||
Total revenues | 1,457,918 | 1,376,820 | 1,274,163 | |||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | 626,001 | 596,902 | 549,716 | |||||||||
Property management expenses | 5,385 | 6,678 | 6,289 | |||||||||
Investment management expenses | 21,389 | 20,514 | 14,742 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 458,595 | 403,786 | 368,783 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 99,040 | 90,667 | 91,571 | |||||||||
Other expenses, net | 19,939 | 16,518 | 12,951 | |||||||||
Restructuring costs | 22,802 | — | — | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,253,151 | 1,135,065 | 1,044,052 | |||||||||
Operating income | 204,767 | 241,755 | 230,111 | |||||||||
Interest income | 17,916 | 41,636 | 35,132 | |||||||||
Provision for losses on notes receivable, net | (4,179 | ) | (3,951 | ) | (2,785 | ) | ||||||
Interest expense | (368,709 | ) | (355,440 | ) | (326,060 | ) | ||||||
Deficit distributions to minority partners | (25,984 | ) | (32,599 | ) | (15,519 | ) | ||||||
Equity in losses of unconsolidated real estate partnerships | (4,601 | ) | (277 | ) | (2,070 | ) | ||||||
(Provision for) recoveries of operating real estate impairment losses | (5,617 | ) | (1,637 | ) | 813 | |||||||
Provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets | (107,459 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other | 99,602 | 32,061 | 27,730 | |||||||||
Loss before income taxes, minority interest and discontinued operations | (194,264 | ) | (78,452 | ) | (52,648 | ) | ||||||
Income tax benefit | 53,371 | 19,840 | 11,095 | |||||||||
Minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships | 22,030 | 1,150 | (12,487 | ) | ||||||||
Loss from continuing operations | (118,863 | ) | (57,462 | ) | (54,040 | ) | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net | 594,358 | 91,579 | 251,104 | |||||||||
Net income | 475,495 | 34,117 | 197,064 | |||||||||
Net income attributable to preferred unitholders | 61,354 | 73,144 | 90,527 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | $ | 414,141 | $ | (39,027 | ) | $ | 106,537 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per common unit — basic and diluted: | ||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations (net of preferred distributions) | $ | (1.38 | ) | $ | (0.87 | ) | $ | (0.96 | ) | |||
Income from discontinued operations | 4.55 | 0.61 | 1.66 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | $ | 3.17 | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.70 | |||||
Weighted average common units outstanding — basic and diluted | 130,772 | 149,883 | 151,285 | |||||||||
Distributions declared per common unit | $ | 5.86 | $ | 3.02 | $ | 1.69 | ||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(In thousands)
General | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Partner | High | Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Special | Perform- | In Aimco | Note | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Limited | Limited | ance | Common | Receivable from | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Units | Partner | Partners | Units | Stock | Aimco | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2005 | $ | 1,188,232 | $ | 1,565,434 | $ | 301,452 | $ | (16,307 | ) | $ | (7,997 | ) | $ | (85,412 | ) | $ | 2,945,402 | |||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - adoption of EITF 04-5 (Note 2) | — | (75,012 | ) | (7,331 | ) | (2,221 | ) | — | — | (84,564 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance of CRA Preferred Units, conversion of Class Thirteen Preferred Units and repayment of note receivable from Aimco | 12,079 | — | — | — | — | 85,412 | 97,491 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred units held by Aimco | (286,750 | ) | (6,848 | ) | — | — | — | — | (293,598 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Common and preferred units redeemed by Limited Partners to Special Limited Partner | (199 | ) | 4,562 | (4,363 | ) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Contribution from Aimco related to employee stock purchases, net | — | 21,880 | — | — | — | — | 21,880 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution from Aimco related to stock option exercises | — | 107,603 | — | — | — | — | 107,603 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of Aimco stock-based compensation | — | 15,874 | — | — | — | — | 15,874 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Class IX Units, net | — | — | — | 654 | — | — | 654 | |||||||||||||||||||||
High Performance Unit valuation adjustment (Note 10) | — | — | — | 2,899 | — | — | 2,899 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred units and common units | — | — | (7,045 | ) | — | — | — | (7,045 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common units related to Aimco common stock repurchases | — | (120,258 | ) | — | — | — | — | (120,258 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other, net | — | 452 | 1,289 | 1,741 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 90,527 | 96,280 | 7,872 | 2,385 | — | — | 197,064 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to common and high performance unitholders | — | (233,108 | ) | (19,964 | ) | (5,718 | ) | 923 | — | (257,867 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred unitholders | (89,674 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (89,674 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to reflect Limited Partners’ capital at redemption value | — | (167,993 | ) | 167,993 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2006 | 914,215 | 1,208,866 | 439,903 | (18,308 | ) | (7,074 | ) | — | 2,537,602 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - adoption of FIN 48 (Note 2) | — | (763 | ) | (61 | ) | (20 | ) | — | — | (844 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred units held by Aimco | (100,000 | ) | (2,000 | ) | — | — | — | — | (102,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Common and preferred units redeemed by Limited Partners to Special Limited Partner | — | 27,853 | (27,853 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution from Aimco related to employee stock purchases, net | — | 1,827 | — | — | — | — | 1,827 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution from Aimco related to stock option exercises | — | 53,719 | — | — | — | — | 53,719 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of Aimco stock-based compensation | — | 19,235 | — | — | — | — | 19,235 | |||||||||||||||||||||
High Performance Unit valuation adjustment | — | — | — | 720 | — | — | 720 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred units and common units | — | — | (2,181 | ) | — | — | — | (2,181 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common units related to Aimco common stock repurchases | — | (325,822 | ) | — | — | — | — | (325,822 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other, net | — | (1,462 | ) | 2,998 | — | — | — | 1,536 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 73,144 | (35,549 | ) | (2,629 | ) | (849 | ) | — | — | 34,117 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to common and high performance unitholders | — | (228,945 | ) | (31,329 | ) | (10,246 | ) | 923 | — | (269,597 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred unitholders | (72,306 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (72,306 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to reflect Limited Partners’ capital at redemption value | — | 125,196 | (125,196 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2007 | 815,053 | 842,155 | 253,652 | (28,703 | ) | (6,151 | ) | — | 1,876,006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred units held by Aimco | (27,000 | ) | 2,160 | — | — | — | — | (24,840 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Common units redeemed by Limited Partners to Special Limited Partner | — | 4,182 | (4,182 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution from Aimco related to employee stock purchases, net | — | 1,671 | — | — | — | — | 1,671 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution from Aimco related to stock option exercises | — | 481 | — | — | — | — | 481 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of Aimco stock-based compensation | — | 17,573 | — | — | — | — | 17,573 | |||||||||||||||||||||
High Performance Unit valuation adjustment | — | — | — | 389 | — | — | 389 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred units and common units | (976 | ) | — | (2,046 | ) | (1,146 | ) | — | — | (4,168 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common units related to Aimco common stock repurchases | — | (473,532 | ) | — | — | — | — | (473,532 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other, net | — | (1,571 | ) | (8 | ) | — | — | — | (1,579 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 61,354 | 383,869 | 22,774 | 7,498 | — | — | 475,495 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to common and high performance unitholders | — | (216,895 | ) | (50,896 | ) | (17,662 | ) | 1,042 | — | (284,411 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred unitholders | (62,700 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (62,700 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of redeemable preferred units to temporary capital (Note 11) | (85,245 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (85,245 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to reflect Limited Partners’ capital at redemption value | — | 136,833 | (136,833 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2008 | $ | 700,486 | $ | 696,926 | $ | 82,461 | $ | (39,624 | ) | $ | (5,109 | ) | $ | — | $ | 1,435,140 | ||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(In thousands)
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 475,495 | $ | 34,117 | $ | 197,064 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 458,595 | 403,786 | 368,783 | |||||||||
Deficit distributions to minority partners | 25,984 | 32,599 | 15,519 | |||||||||
Equity in losses of unconsolidated real estate partnerships | 4,601 | 277 | 2,070 | |||||||||
Provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets | 107,459 | — | — | |||||||||
Real estate impairment losses (recoveries), net | 5,617 | 1,637 | (813 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other | (99,602 | ) | (32,061 | ) | (27,730 | ) | ||||||
Deferred income tax benefit | (53,371 | ) | (19,840 | ) | (11,095 | ) | ||||||
Minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships | (22,030 | ) | (1,150 | ) | 12,487 | |||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 13,833 | 14,921 | 12,314 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred loan costs and other | 10,694 | 9,827 | 14,893 | |||||||||
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities | 14,619 | 4,239 | 3,578 | |||||||||
Distributions of earnings to minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships | (18,887 | ) | (17,406 | ) | (13,369 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 57,288 | 96,554 | 129,994 | |||||||||
Gain on disposition of real estate, net of minority partners’ interest | (618,168 | ) | (65,076 | ) | (258,970 | ) | ||||||
Other adjustments to income from discontinued operations | 33,314 | (7,437 | ) | 18,631 | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and operating liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | 4,848 | 7,453 | (936 | ) | ||||||||
Other assets | 53,699 | (9,751 | ) | 45,332 | ||||||||
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other | (32,507 | ) | 12,847 | 13,400 | ||||||||
Total adjustments | (54,014 | ) | 431,419 | 324,088 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 421,481 | 465,536 | 521,152 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Purchases of real estate | (112,655 | ) | (201,434 | ) | (153,426 | ) | ||||||
Capital expenditures | (665,233 | ) | (689,719 | ) | (512,564 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from dispositions of real estate | 2,060,344 | 431,863 | 958,604 | |||||||||
Change in funds held in escrow from tax-free exchanges | 345 | 25,863 | (19,021 | ) | ||||||||
Cash from newly consolidated properties | 241 | 7,549 | 23,269 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of interests and distributions from real estate partnerships | 94,277 | 198,998 | 45,662 | |||||||||
Purchases of partnership interests and other assets | (28,121 | ) | (86,204 | ) | (37,570 | ) | ||||||
Originations of notes receivable | (6,911 | ) | (10,812 | ) | (94,640 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable | 8,929 | 14,370 | 9,604 | |||||||||
Distributions received from Aimco | 1,042 | 923 | 924 | |||||||||
Other investing activities | (6,347 | ) | 37,927 | 13,122 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 1,345,911 | (270,676 | ) | 233,964 | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from property loans | 949,549 | 1,552,048 | 1,185,670 | |||||||||
Principal repayments on property loans | (1,291,543 | ) | (850,484 | ) | (1,004,142 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from tax-exempt bond financing | 50,100 | 82,350 | 75,568 | |||||||||
Principal repayments on tax-exempt bond financing | (217,361 | ) | (70,029 | ) | (229,287 | ) | ||||||
(Principal repayments) on and borrowings under term loans | (75,000 | ) | 75,000 | — | ||||||||
Net repayments on revolving credit facility | — | (140,000 | ) | (77,000 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from (payments on) other borrowings | 21,367 | (8,468 | ) | (22,838 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net | — | — | 97,491 | |||||||||
Repurchases and redemptions of preferred units | (24,840 | ) | (102,000 | ) | (286,750 | ) | ||||||
Repurchase of common units | (502,296 | ) | (307,382 | ) | (109,937 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from Class A Common Stock option exercises | 481 | 53,719 | 107,603 | |||||||||
Payment of distributions to minority interest | (229,650 | ) | (151,093 | ) | (84,389 | ) | ||||||
Payment of distributions to General Partner and Special Limited Partner | (213,328 | ) | (231,729 | ) | (232,621 | ) | ||||||
Payment of distributions to Limited Partners | (55,770 | ) | (16,760 | ) | (19,964 | ) | ||||||
Payment of distributions to High Performance Units | (18,757 | ) | (5,710 | ) | (5,718 | ) | ||||||
Principal repayments received on notes due on common unit purchases | 1,458 | 1,659 | 21,844 | |||||||||
Payment of distributions to preferred units | (62,733 | ) | (74,221 | ) | (84,087 | ) | ||||||
Other financing activities | (9,854 | ) | (21,123 | ) | (18,465 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (1,678,177 | ) | (214,223 | ) | (687,022 | ) | ||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 89,215 | (19,363 | ) | 68,094 | ||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR | 210,461 | 229,824 | 161,730 | |||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR | $ | 299,676 | $ | 210,461 | $ | 229,824 | ||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(In thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(In thousands)
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 434,645 | $ | 452,324 | $ | 423,456 | ||||||
Cash paid for income taxes | 13,780 | 2,994 | 9,807 | |||||||||
Non-cash transactions associated with the acquisition of real estate and interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships: | ||||||||||||
Secured debt assumed in connection with purchase of real estate | — | 16,000 | 47,112 | |||||||||
Issuance of OP Units for interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships and acquisitions of real estate | — | 2,998 | 13 | |||||||||
Non-cash transactions associated with the disposition of real estate: | ||||||||||||
Secured debt assumed in connection with the disposition of real estate | 157,394 | 27,929 | — | |||||||||
Issuance of notes receivable connection with the disposition of real estate | 10,372 | — | — | |||||||||
Non-cash transactions associated with consolidation of real estate partnerships: | ||||||||||||
Real estate, net | 25,830 | 56,877 | 675,621 | |||||||||
Investments in and notes receivable primarily from affiliated entities | 4,497 | 84,545 | (219,691 | ) | ||||||||
Restricted cash and other assets | 5,483 | 8,545 | 94,380 | |||||||||
Secured debt | 22,036 | 41,296 | 503,342 | |||||||||
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities | 14,020 | 48,602 | 41,580 | |||||||||
Other non-cash transactions: | ||||||||||||
Redemption of common OP Units for Aimco Class A Common Stock | 4,182 | 27,810 | 4,362 | |||||||||
Conversion of preferred units and securities into common units | — | 43 | 199 | |||||||||
Origination of notes receivable from officers of Aimco, net of cancellations | (385 | ) | 2,386 | 647 | ||||||||
Exchanges of preferred OP units | — | — | 85,412 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008
NOTE 1 — Organization
AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, or the Partnership, and together with its consolidated subsidiaries was formed on May 16, 1994 to conduct the business of acquiring, redeveloping, leasing, and managing multifamily apartment properties. Our securities include Partnership Common Units, or common OP Units, Partnership Preferred Units, or preferred OP Units, and High Performance Partnership Units, or High Performance Units, which are collectively referred to as “OP Units.” Apartment Investment and Management Company, or Aimco, is the owner of our general partner, AIMCO-GP, Inc., or the General Partner, and special limited partner, AIMCO-LP Trust, or the Special Limited Partner. The General Partner and Special Limited Partner hold common OP Units and are the primary holders of outstanding preferred OP Units. “Limited Partners” refers to individuals or entities that are our limited partners, other than Aimco, the General Partner or the Special Limited Partner, and own common OP Units or preferred OP Units. Generally, after holding the common OP Units for one year, the Limited Partners have the right to redeem their common OP Units for cash, subject to our prior right to acquire some or all of the common OP Units tendered for redemption in exchange for shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. Common OP Units redeemed for Aimco Class A Common Stock are generally exchanged on a one-for-one basis (subject to antidilution adjustments). Preferred OP Units and High Performance Units may or may not be redeemable based on their respective terms, as provided for in the Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties, L.P. as amended, or the Partnership Agreement.
We, through our operating divisions and subsidiaries, hold substantially all of Aimco’s assets and manage the daily operations of Aimco’s business and assets. Aimco is required to contribute all proceeds from offerings of its securities to us. In addition, substantially all of Aimco’s assets must be owned through the Partnership; therefore, Aimco is generally required to contribute all assets acquired to us. In exchange for the contribution of offering proceeds or assets, Aimco receives additional interests in us with similar terms (e.g., if Aimco contributes proceeds of a preferred stock offering, Aimco (through the General Partner and Special Limited Partner) receives preferred OP Units with terms substantially similar to the preferred securities issued by Aimco).
Aimco frequently consummates transactions for our benefit. For legal, tax or other business reasons, Aimco may hold title or ownership of certain assets until they can be transferred to us. However, we have a controlling financial interest in substantially all of Aimco’s assets in the process of transfer to us. Except as the context otherwise requires, “we,” “our” and “us” refer to the Partnership, and the Partnership’s consolidated entities, collectively. Except as the context otherwise requires, “Aimco” refers to Aimco and Aimco’s consolidated entities, collectively.
As of December 31, 2008, we:
• | owned an equity interest in and consolidated 117,719 units in 514 properties (which we refer to as “consolidated properties”), of which 114,966 units were also managed by us; |
• | owned an equity interest in and did not consolidate 9,613 units in 85 properties (which we refer to as “unconsolidated properties”), of which 4,546 units were also managed by us; and |
• | provided services for or managed 35,475 units in 393 properties, primarily pursuant to long-term agreements (including 32,223 units in 359 properties for which we provide asset management services only, and not also property management services). In certain cases, we may indirectly own generally less than one percent of the operations of such properties through a partnership syndication or other fund. |
At December 31, 2008, we had outstanding 108,315,704 common OP Units, 28,164,846 preferred OP Units and 2,344,719 High Performance Units.
In December 2007, July 2008, October 2008, and December 2008, we declared special distributions payable on January 30, 2008, August 29, 2008, December 1, 2008, and January 29, 2009, respectively, to holders of record of common OP Units and High Performance Units on December 31, 2007, July 28, 2008, October 27, 2008, and December 29, 2008, respectively. The special distributions were paid on common OP Units and High Performance Units in the amounts listed below. We distributed to Aimco common OP Units equal to the number of shares we issued pursuant to Aimco’s corresponding special dividends (discussed below) in addition to approximately $0.60 per unit in cash. Holders of common OP Units other than Aimco and holders of High Performance Units received the distribution entirely in cash, in the amounts noted below.
F-8
Table of Contents
Also in December 2007, July 2008, October 2008, and December 2008, Aimco’s board of directors declared corresponding special dividends payable on January 30, 2008, August 29, 2008, December 1, 2008, and January 29, 2009, respectively, to holders of record of our Common Stock on December 31, 2007, July 28, 2008, October 27, 2008, and December 29, 2008, respectively. A portion of the special dividends in the amount of $0.60 per share represents payment of the regular dividend for the quarters ended December 31, 2007, June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2008, and the remaining amount per share represents an additional dividend associated with taxable gains from property dispositions. The special dividends were paid in the amounts listed in the table below. Portions of the special dividends were paid through the issuance of shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock.
Special Distributions | January 2008 | August 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | ||||||||||||
Distribution per unit | $ | 2.51 | $ | 3.00 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 2.08 | ||||||||
Total distribution | $257.2 million | $285.5 million | $176.6 million | $230.1 million | ||||||||||||
Common OP Units and High Performance Units outstanding on record date | 102,478,510 | 95,151,333 | 98,136,520 | 110,654,142 | ||||||||||||
Common OP Units held by Aimco | 92,795,891 | 85,619,144 | 88,650,980 | 101,169,951 | ||||||||||||
Total distribution on Aimco common OP Units | $232.9 million | $256.9 million | $159.6 million | $210.4 million | ||||||||||||
Cash distribution to Aimco | $55.0 million | $51.4 million | $53.2 million | $60.6 million | ||||||||||||
Portion of distribution paid to Aimco through issuance of common OP Units | $177.9 million | $205.5 million | $106.4 million | $149.8 million | ||||||||||||
Common OP Units issued to Aimco pursuant to distributions | 4,594,074 | 5,731,310 | 12,572,267 | 15,627,330 | ||||||||||||
Effective increase in outstanding common OP Units and High Performance units on record date | 4.48 | % | 6.02 | % | 12.81 | % | 14.12 | % | ||||||||
Cash distributed to holders of common OP Units and High Performance Units other than Aimco | $24.3 million | $28.6 million | $17.0 million | $19.7 million | ||||||||||||
Amounts after elimination of the effects of units held by us and our consolidated subsidiaries: | ||||||||||||||||
Common OP Units and High Performance Units outstanding on record date | 102,062,370 | 94,714,854 | 97,671,996 | 110,127,008 | ||||||||||||
Common OP Units held by Aimco | 92,379,751 | 85,182,665 | 88,186,456 | 100,642,817 | ||||||||||||
Total distribution | $256.2 million | $284.1 million | $175.8 million | $229.1 million | ||||||||||||
Total distribution on Aimco common OP Units | $231.9 million | $255.5 million | $ | 158.2 million | $209.3 million | |||||||||||
Cash distribution to Aimco | $54.8 million | $51.1 million | $52.9 million | $ | 60.3 million | |||||||||||
Portion of dividend paid through issuance of shares | $177.1 million | $204.4 million | $105.3 million | $149.0 million | ||||||||||||
Common OP Units issued pursuant to distribution | 4,573,735 | 5,703,265 | 12,509,657 | 15,548,996 |
The effect of the issuance of additional units pursuant to the special dividends has been retroactively reflected in each of the historical periods presented as if those units were issued and outstanding at the beginning of the earliest period presented; accordingly, all activity prior to the ex-dividend date of the special distributions, including unit issuances, repurchases and forfeitures, have been adjusted to reflect the effective increases in the number of units, except in limited instances where noted otherwise.
F-9
Table of Contents
The following table reconciles our common OP Units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008, to our common OP Units outstanding at December 31, 2008, per the consolidated financial statements:
Common OP Units issued and outstanding | 108,315,704 | |||
Common OP Units issued to Aimco pursuant to the special distributions | 15,627,330 | |||
Elimination of units owned by us and our consolidated subsidiaries (prior to January 2009 special distribution) | (527,134 | ) | ||
Elimination of units issued to us and our consolidated subsidiaries pursuant to the January 2009 special distribution | (78,334 | ) | ||
Forfeitures and other activity not yet processed by transfer agent | (17,217 | ) | ||
Common OP Units outstanding at December 31, 2008, per consolidated financial statements | 123,320,349 | |||
NOTE 2 — Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and its consolidated entities. Pursuant to a Management and Contribution Agreement between the Partnership and Aimco, we have acquired, in exchange for interests in the Partnership, the economic benefits of subsidiaries of Aimco in which we do not have an interest, and Aimco has granted us a right of first refusal to acquire such subsidiaries’ assets for no additional consideration. Pursuant to the agreement, Aimco has also granted us certain rights with respect to assets of such subsidiaries. We consolidate all variable interest entities for which we are the primary beneficiary. Generally, we consolidate real estate partnerships and other entities that are not variable interest entities when we own, directly or indirectly, a majority voting interest in the entity or are otherwise able to control the entity. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Interests held in consolidated real estate partnerships by limited partners other than us are reflected as minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships. The assets of consolidated real estate partnerships owned or controlled by Aimco or us generally are not available to pay creditors of Aimco or the Partnership.
As used herein, and except where the context otherwise requires, “partnership” refers to a limited partnership or a limited liability company and “partner” refers to a partner in a limited partnership or a member in a limited liability company.
Variable Interest Entities
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, or FIN 46, addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities. We consolidate all variable interest entities for which we are the primary beneficiary. Generally, a variable interest entity, or VIE, is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about an entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. FIN 46 requires a VIE to be consolidated in the financial statements of the entity that is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The primary beneficiary generally is the entity that will receive a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, receive a majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns, or both.
In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we consider qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but not limited to: the amount and characteristics of our investment; the obligation or likelihood for us or other investors to provide financial support; our and the other investors’ ability to control or significantly influence key decisions for the VIE; and the similarity with and significance to the business activities of us and the other investors. Significant judgments related to these determinations include estimates about the current and future fair values and performance of real estate held by these VIEs and general market conditions.
As of December 31, 2008, we were the primary beneficiary of, and therefore consolidated, 93 VIEs, which owned 70 apartment properties with 10,096 units. Real estate with a carrying value of $796.7 million collateralized the $472.0 million of debt of those VIEs. The creditors of the consolidated VIEs do not have recourse to our general credit. As of December 31, 2008, we also held variable interests in 130 VIEs for which we were not the primary beneficiary. Those VIEs consist primarily of partnerships that are engaged, directly or indirectly, in the ownership and management of 181 apartment properties with 11,181 units. We are involved with those VIEs as an equity holder, lender, management agent, or through other contractual relationships. At December 31, 2008, our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with unconsolidated VIEs is limited to our recorded investments in and receivables from those VIEs totaling $117.2 million and our contractual obligation to advance funds to certain VIEs totaling $5.6 million. We may be subject to additional losses to the extent of any financial support that we voluntarily provide in the future. Additionally, the provision of financial support in the future may require us to consolidate a VIE.
F-10
Table of Contents
Adoption of EITF 04-5
In June 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 04-5,Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights, or EITF 04-5. EITF 04-5 provides an accounting model to be used by a general partner, or group of general partners, to determine whether the general partner(s) controls a limited partnership or similar entity in light of substantive kick-out rights and substantive participating rights held by the limited partners, and provides additional guidance on what constitutes those rights. EITF 04-5 was effective after June 29, 2005, for general partners of (a) all newly formed limited partnerships and (b) existing limited partnerships for which the partnership agreements have been modified. We consolidated four partnerships in the fourth quarter of 2005 based on EITF 04-5 requirements. The consolidation of those partnerships had an immaterial effect on our consolidated financial statements. EITF 04-5 was effective on January 1, 2006, for general partners of all limited partnerships and similar entities. We applied EITF 04-5 as of January 1, 2006, using a transition method that does not involve retrospective application to our financial statements for prior periods.
We consolidated 156 previously unconsolidated partnerships as a result of the application of EITF 04-5 in 2006. Those partnerships own, or control other entities that own, 149 apartment properties. Our direct and indirect interests in the profits and losses of those partnerships range from less than one percent to 50 percent, and average approximately 22 percent.
In prior periods, we used the equity method to account for our investments in the partnerships that we consolidated in 2006 in accordance with EITF 04-5. Under the equity method, we recognized partnership income or losses based generally on our percentage interest in the partnership. Consolidation of a partnership does not ordinarily result in a change to the net amount of partnership income or loss that is recognized using the equity method. However, when a partnership has a deficit in equity, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, may require the controlling partner that consolidates the partnership to recognize any losses that would otherwise be allocated to noncontrolling partners, in addition to the controlling partner’s share of losses. Certain of the partnerships that we consolidated in accordance with EITF 04-5 had deficits in equity that resulted from losses or deficit distributions during prior periods when we accounted for our investment using the equity method. We would have been required to recognize the noncontrolling partners’ share of those losses had we applied EITF 04-5 in those prior periods. In accordance with our transition method for the adoption of EITF 04-5, we recorded an $84.6 million charge to partners’ capital as of January 1, 2006, for the cumulative amount of additional losses that we would have recognized had we applied EITF 04-5 in prior periods. Substantially all of those losses were attributable to real estate depreciation expense. As a result of applying EITF 04-5 for the year ended December 31, 2006, our income from continuing operations includes partnership losses in addition to losses that would have resulted from continued application of the equity method of $24.4 million.
Adoption of SFAS 157
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements, or SFAS 157. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS 157 establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used in developing fair value estimates and requires disclosure of fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable data (Level 3 measurements), such as the reporting entity’s own data, and to nonrecurring fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The provisions of SFAS 157 are applicable to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements of financial assets and liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 that apply to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements of financial assets and liabilities effective January 1, 2008, and at that time determined no transition adjustment was required.
F-11
Table of Contents
Basis of Fair Value Measurement (Valuation Hierarchy)
SFAS 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices for identical and unrestricted assets or liabilities in active markets | |
Level 2 — | Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument | |
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement |
A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
F-12
Table of Contents
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for our significant financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. Although some of the valuation methodologies use observable market inputs in limited instances, the majority of inputs we use are unobservable and are therefore classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Fair Value | ||
Measurement | Valuation Methodologies | |
Notes receivable | We assess the collectibility of notes receivable on a periodic basis, which assessment consists primarily of an evaluation of cash flow projections of the borrower to determine whether estimated cash flows are sufficient to repay principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the note. We recognize impairments on notes receivable when it is probable that principal and interest will not be received in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. The amount of the impairment to be recognized generally is based on the fair value of the real estate, the collateral for the loan, which represents the primary source of loan repayment. The fair value of the collateral, such as real estate or interests in real estate partnerships, is estimated through income and market valuation approaches using information such as broker estimates, purchase prices for recent transactions on comparable assets and net operating income capitalization analyses using observable and unobservable inputs such as capitalization rates, asset quality grading, geographic location analysis, and local supply and demand observations. | |
Total rate of return swaps | Our total rate of return swaps have contractually-defined termination values generally equal to the difference between the fair value and the counterparty’s purchased value of the underlying borrowings. Upon termination, we are required to pay the counterparty the difference if the fair value is less than the purchased value, and the counterparty is required to pay us the difference if the fair value is greater than the purchased value. The underlying borrowings are generally callable, at our option, at face value prior to maturity and with no prepayment penalty. Due to our control of the call features in the underlying borrowings, we believe the inherent value of any differential between the fixed and variable cash payments due under the swaps would be significantly discounted by a market participant willing to purchase or assume any rights and obligations under these contracts. | |
The swaps are generally cross-collateralized with other swap contracts with the same counterparty and do not allow transfer or assignment, thus there is no alternate or secondary market for these instruments. Accordingly, our assumptions of the fair value that a willing market participant would assign in valuing these instruments are based on a hypothetical market in which the highest and best use of these contracts is in-use in combination with the related borrowings, similar to how we use the contracts. Based on these assumptions, we believe the termination value, or exit value, of the swaps approximates the fair value that would be assigned by a willing market participant. We calculate the termination value using a market approach by reference to estimates of the fair value of the underlying borrowings, which are discussed below, and an evaluation of potential changes in the credit quality of the counterparties to these arrangements. We compare our estimates of fair value of the swaps and related borrowings to valuations provided by the counterparties on a quarterly basis. | ||
Our method for calculating fair value of the swaps generally results in changes in fair value equal to the changes in fair value of the related borrowings. We believe these instruments are highly effective in offsetting the changes in fair value of the borrowings during the hedging period. |
F-13
Table of Contents
Fair Value | ||
Measurement | Valuation Methodologies | |
Changes in fair value of borrowings subject to total rate of return swaps | We recognize changes in the fair value of certain borrowings subject to total rate of return swaps, which we have designated as fair value hedges in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, or SFAS 133. | |
We estimate the fair value of debt instruments using an income and market approach, including comparison of the contractual terms to observable and unobservable inputs such as market interest rate risk spreads, collateral quality and loan-to-value ratios on similarly encumbered assets within our portfolio. These borrowings are collateralized and non-recourse to us; therefore, we believe changes in our credit rating will not materially affect a market participant’s estimate of the borrowings’ fair value. |
The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Amounts subject to SFAS 157 reported at fair value in our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2008, all of which are based on significant unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, are summarized below (in thousands):
Assets (Liabilities) | ||||
Total rate of return swaps | $ | (29,495 | ) | |
Cumulative reduction of carrying amount of debt instruments subject to total rate of return swaps | $ | 29,495 |
Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The table below presents the balance sheet amounts at December 31, 2007 and 2008 (and the changes in fair value between such dates) for fair value measurements classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy (in thousands). When a determination is made to classify a fair value measurement within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement. However, Level 3 fair value measurements typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level 3 components, observable components that can be validated to observable external sources; accordingly, the changes in fair value in the table below are due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.
Unrealized | Realized gains | |||||||||||||||
Fair value at | Gains (Losses) | (losses) | Fair value at | |||||||||||||
December 31, | included in | included in | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2007 | earnings (1) | earnings (2) | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Total rate of return swaps | $ | (9,420 | ) | $ | (20,075 | )(3) | $ | — | $ | (29,495 | ) | |||||
Changes in fair value of debt instruments subject to total rate of return swaps | 9,420 | 20,075 | (3) | — | 29,495 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
(1) | Unrealized gains (losses) relate to periodic revaluations of fair value and have not resulted from the settlement of a swap position. | |
(2) | For total rate of return swaps, realized gains (losses) occur upon the settlement, resulting from the repayment of the underlying borrowings or the early termination of the swap, and include any net amounts paid or received upon such settlement. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we terminated total rate of return swaps with notional amounts totaling $90.3 million in connection with the sale of four properties and repayment of the related hedged debt. We repaid the debt at the swap counterparty’s purchased value, and accordingly we incurred no termination payments upon termination of the related swaps. | |
(3) | Included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. |
F-14
Table of Contents
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We believe that the aggregate fair value of our cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables and short-term secured debt approximates their aggregate carrying value at December 31, 2008, due to their relatively short-term nature and high probability of realization. We estimate fair value for our notes receivable and debt instruments using present value techniques that include income and market valuation approaches with market rates for debt with the same or similar terms. Present value calculations vary depending on the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In many cases, the fair value estimates may not be realizable in immediate settlement of the instruments. The estimated aggregate fair value of our notes receivable was approximately $161.6 million and $191.5 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. See Note 5 for further information on notes receivable. The estimated aggregate fair value of our consolidated debt (including amounts reported in liabilities related to assets held for sale) was approximately $6.7 billion and $7.6 billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The combined carrying value of our consolidated debt (including amounts reported in liabilities related to assets held for sale) was approximately $6.8 billion and $7.5 billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. See Note 6 and Note 7 for further details on our consolidated debt. Refer toDerivative Financial Instrumentsfor further discussion regarding certain of our fixed rate debt that is subject to total rate of return swap instruments.
Adoption of SFAS 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, or SFAS 159. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We implemented SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008, and at that time did not elect the fair value option for any of our financial instruments or other items within the scope of SFAS 159.
Tax Credit Arrangements
We sponsor certain partnerships that own and operate apartment properties that qualify for tax credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code, and for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD, subsidized rents under HUD’s Section 8 program. These partnerships acquire, develop and operate qualifying affordable housing properties and are structured to provide for the pass-through of tax credits and deductions to their partners. The tax credits are generally realized ratably over the first ten years of the tax credit arrangement and are subject to the partnership’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations for a period of 15 years. Typically, we are the general partner with a legal ownership interest of one percent or less. We market limited partner interests of at least 99 percent to unaffiliated institutional investors (which we refer to as tax credit investors or investors) and receive a syndication fee from each investor upon such investor’s admission to the partnership. At inception, each investor agrees to fund capital contributions to the partnerships. We agree to perform various services to the partnerships in exchange for fees over the expected duration of the tax credit service period. The related partnership agreements generally require adjustment of each tax credit investor’s required capital contributions if actual tax benefits to such investor differ from projected amounts.
We have determined that the partnerships in these arrangements are variable interest entities and, where we are general partner, we are the primary beneficiary that is required to consolidate the partnerships. Based on the contractual arrangements that obligate us to deliver tax benefits to the investors, and that entitle us through fee arrangements to receive substantially all available cash flow from the partnerships, we determined that these partnerships are most appropriately accounted for by us as wholly owned subsidiaries. We also determined that capital contributions received by the partnerships from tax credit investors represent, in substance, consideration that we receive in exchange for our obligation to deliver tax credits and other tax benefits to the investors, and these receipts are appropriately recognized as revenue in our consolidated financial statements when our obligation to the investors is relieved upon delivery of the expected tax benefits.
F-15
Table of Contents
In summary, our accounting treatment recognizes the income or loss generated by the underlying real estate based on our economic interest in the partnerships. Proceeds received in exchange for the transfer of the tax credits are recognized as revenue proportionately as the tax benefits are delivered to the tax credit investors and our obligation is relieved. Syndication fees and related costs are recognized in income upon completion of the syndication effort. We recognize syndication fees in amounts determined based on a market rate analysis of fees for comparable services, which generally fell within a range of 10% to 15% of investor contributions during the periods presented. Other direct and incremental costs incurred in structuring these arrangements are deferred and amortized over the expected duration of the arrangement in proportion to the recognition of related income. Investor contributions in excess of recognized revenue are reported as deferred income in our consolidated balance sheets.
During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we recognized syndication fee income of $3.4 million, $13.8 million and $12.7 million, respectively, and revenue associated with the delivery of tax benefits of $29.4 million, $24.0 million and $16.0 million, respectively. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, $159.6 million and $149.2 million, respectively, of investor contributions in excess of the recognized revenue were included in deferred income in our consolidated balance sheets.
Acquisition of Real Estate Assets and Related Depreciation and Amortization
We capitalize the purchase price and incremental direct costs associated with the acquisition of properties as the cost of the assets acquired. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141,Business Combinations, or SFAS 141, we allocate the cost of acquired properties to tangible assets and identified intangible assets based on their fair values. We determine the fair value of tangible assets, such as land, building, furniture, fixtures and equipment, on an “as-if vacant” basis, generally using internal valuation techniques that consider comparable market transactions, discounted cash flow techniques, replacement costs and other available information. We determine the fair value of identified intangible assets (or liabilities), which typically relate to in-place leases, using internal valuation techniques that consider the terms of the in-place leases, current market data for comparable leases, and our experience in leasing similar properties. The intangible assets or liabilities related to in-place leases are comprised of:
1. | The value of the above- and below-market leases in-place. An asset or liability is recognized based on the difference between (a) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (b) our estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over the period, including estimated lease renewals for below-market leases, that the leases are expected to remain in effect. |
2. | The estimated unamortized portion of avoided leasing commissions and other costs that ordinarily would be incurred to acquire the in-place leases. |
3. | The value associated with vacant units during the absorption period (estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand and stabilized occupancy levels). |
The values of the above- and below-market leases are amortized to rental revenue over the expected remaining terms of the associated leases. Other intangible assets related to in-place leases are amortized to depreciation and amortization over the expected remaining terms of the associated leases. Amortization is adjusted, as necessary, to reflect any early lease terminations that were not anticipated in determining amortization periods.
Depreciation for all tangible real estate assets is calculated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Acquired buildings and improvements are depreciated over a composite life of 14 to 52 years, based on the age, condition and other physical characteristics of the property. As discussed underImpairment of Long Lived Assetsbelow, we may adjust depreciation of properties that are expected to be disposed of or demolished prior to the end of their useful lives. Furniture, fixtures and equipment associated with acquired properties are depreciated over five years.
F-16
Table of Contents
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, deferred income in our consolidated balance sheets includes below-market lease values totaling $36.2 million and $45.0 million, respectively which are net of accumulated amortization of $16.6 million and $12.2 million, respectively. Additions to below-market leases resulting from acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2007 totaled $18.9 million, and there were no such additions during the years ended December 31, 2008 or 2006. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we included amortization of below-market leases of $4.4 million, $4.6 million and $2.8 million, respectively, in rental and other property revenues in our consolidated statements of income. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we revised the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in acquisitions completed in 2007, resulting in a $4.4 million reduction of below-market lease values and a corresponding reduction in buildings and improvements. At December 31, 2008, our below-market leases had a weighted average amortization period of 7.3 years and estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years as follows:
2009 | $ | 4.4 | ||
2010 | 3.9 | |||
2011 | 3.6 | |||
2012 | 3.2 | |||
2013 | 2.8 |
Capital Expenditures and Related Depreciation
We capitalize costs, including certain indirect costs, incurred in connection with our capital expenditure activities, including redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property improvements, and replacements of existing property components. Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital expenditure activities at the property level. We characterize as “indirect costs” an allocation of certain department costs, including payroll, at the area operations and corporate levels that clearly relate to capital expenditure activities. We capitalize interest, property taxes and insurance during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress. We charge to expense as incurred costs that do not relate to capital expenditure activities, including ordinary repairs, maintenance, resident turnover costs and general and administrative expenses.
We depreciate capitalized costs using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related component or improvement, which is five, 15 or 30 years. All capitalized site payroll and indirect costs are allocated proportionately, based on direct costs, among capital projects and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of such projects.
Certain homogeneous items that are purchased in bulk on a recurring basis, such as carpeting and appliances, are depreciated using group methods that reflect the average estimated useful life of the items in each group. Except in the case of property casualties, where the net book value of lost property is written off in the determination of casualty gains or losses, we generally do not recognize any loss in connection with the replacement of an existing property component because normal replacements are considered in determining the estimated useful lives used in connection with our composite and group depreciation methods.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, for continuing and discontinued operations, we capitalized $25.7 million, $30.8 million and $24.7 million, respectively, of interest costs, and $78.1 million, $78.1 million and $66.2 million, respectively, of site payroll and indirect costs, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We apply the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,or SFAS 144, to determine whether our real estate and other long-lived assets are impaired. Such assets to be held and used are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. Based on periodic tests of recoverability of long-lived assets, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we recorded operating real estate impairment losses of $5.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, related to properties to be held and used. For the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded net recoveries of previously recorded operating real estate impairment losses of $0.8 million.
In connection with the preparation of our annual financial statements, we assessed the recoverability of our investment in our Lincoln Place property, located in Venice, California. Based upon the recent decline in land values in Southern California and the expected timing of our redevelopment efforts, we determined that the total carrying amount of the property was no longer probable of full recovery and, accordingly, during the three months ended December 31, 2008, recognized an impairment loss of $85.4 million ($55.6 million net of tax).
F-17
Table of Contents
Similarly, we assessed the recoverability of our investment in Pacific Bay Vistas (formerly Treetops), a vacant property located in San Bruno, California, and determined that the carrying value for the property exceeded its estimated fair value. Accordingly, we recognized an impairment loss of $5.7 million for this property during the three months ended December 31, 2008.
The impairment losses related to Lincoln Place, Pacific Bay Vistas and our investment in Casden Properties LLC (see
Note 5), are included in provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Note 5), are included in provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The amounts reported in continuing operations for real estate impairment (losses) recoveries, net include impairment losses related to consolidated properties to be held and used, as well as our share of all impairment losses or recoveries related to unconsolidated properties. We report impairment losses or recoveries related to properties sold or classified as held for sale in discontinued operations.
Our tests of recoverability address real estate assets that do not currently meet all conditions to be classified as held for sale, but are expected to be disposed of prior to the end of their estimated useful lives. If an impairment loss is not required to be recorded in accordance with SFAS 144, the recognition of depreciation is adjusted prospectively, as necessary, to reduce the carrying amount of the real estate to its estimated disposition value over the remaining period that the real estate is expected to be held and used. We also may adjust depreciation prospectively to reduce to zero the carrying amount of buildings that we plan to demolish in connection with a redevelopment project. These depreciation adjustments decreased net income by $11.8 million, $37.3 million and $34.7 million, and resulted in decreases in basic and diluted earnings per unit of $0.09, $0.25 and $0.23, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Cash Equivalents
In accordance with GAAP, highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are classified as cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes capital replacement reserves, tax-free exchange funds, completion repair reserves, bond sinking fund amounts and tax and insurance escrow accounts held by lenders.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are generally comprised of amounts receivable from residents, amounts receivable from non-affiliated real estate partnerships for which we provide property management and other services and other miscellaneous receivables from non-affiliated entities. We evaluate collectibility of accounts receivable from residents and establish an allowance, after the application of security deposits and other anticipated recoveries, for accounts greater than 30 days past due for current residents and all receivables due from former residents. Accounts receivable from residents are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately $3.3 million and $3.1 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
We evaluate collectibility of accounts receivable from non-affiliated entities and establish an allowance for amounts that are considered to be uncollectible. Accounts receivable relating to non-affiliated entities are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately $5.0 million and $4.6 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts from Affiliates
Accounts receivable from affiliates are generally comprised of receivables related to property management and other services provided to unconsolidated real estate partnerships in which we have an ownership interest. We evaluate collectibility of accounts receivable balances from affiliates on a periodic basis, and establish an allowance for the amounts deemed to be uncollectible. Accounts receivable from affiliates are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately $5.6 million and $5.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
F-18
Table of Contents
Deferred Costs
We defer lender fees and other direct costs incurred in obtaining new financing and amortize the amounts over the terms of the related loan agreements. Amortization of these costs is included in interest expense.
We defer leasing commissions and other direct costs incurred in connection with successful leasing efforts and amortize the costs over the terms of the related leases. Amortization of these costs is included in depreciation and amortization.
Advertising Costs
We generally expense all advertising costs as incurred to property operating expense. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, for both continuing and discontinued operations, total advertising expense was $36.0 million, $38.0 million and $34.7 million, respectively.
Notes Receivable from Unconsolidated Real Estate Partnerships and Non-Affiliates and Related Interest Income and Provision for Losses
Notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships consist primarily of notes receivable from partnerships in which we are the general partner but do not consolidate the partnership under FIN 46 or EITF 04-5. The ultimate repayment of these notes and those from non-affiliates is subject to a number of variables, including the performance and value of the underlying real estate property and the claims of unaffiliated mortgage lenders. Our notes receivable include loans extended by us that we carry at the face amount plus accrued interest, which we refer to as “par value notes,” and loans extended by predecessors whose positions we generally acquired at a discount, which we refer to as “discounted notes.”
We record interest income on par value notes as earned in accordance with the terms of the related loan agreements. We discontinue the accrual of interest on such notes when the notes are impaired, as discussed below, or when there is otherwise significant uncertainty as to the collection of interest. We record income on such nonaccrual loans using the cost recovery method, under which we apply cash receipts first to the recorded amount of the loan; thereafter, any additional receipts are recognized as income.
We recognize interest income on discounted notes receivable based upon whether the amount and timing of collections are both probable and reasonably estimable. We consider collections to be probable and reasonably estimable when the borrower has entered into certain closed or pending transactions (which include real estate sales, refinancings, foreclosures and rights offerings) that provide a reliable source of repayment. In such instances, we recognize accretion income, on a prospective basis using the effective interest method over the estimated remaining term of the loans, equal to the difference between the carrying amount of the discounted notes and the estimated collectible value. We record income on all other discounted notes using the cost recovery method.
We assess the collectibility of notes receivable on a periodic basis, which assessment consists primarily of an evaluation of cash flow projections of the borrower to determine whether estimated cash flows are sufficient to repay principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the note. We recognize impairments on notes receivable when it is probable that principal and interest will not be received in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. The amount of the impairment to be recognized generally is based on the fair value of the partnership’s real estate that represents the primary source of loan repayment. In certain instances where other sources of cash flow are available to repay the loan, the impairment is measured by discounting the estimated cash flows at the loan’s original effective interest rate. See Note 5 for further discussion of Notes Receivable.
Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Partnerships
We own general and limited partner interests in real estate partnerships that own apartment properties. We generally account for investments in real estate partnerships that we do not consolidate under the equity method. Under the equity method, our share of the earnings or losses of the entity for the periods being presented is included in equity in earnings (losses) from unconsolidated real estate partnerships, except for our share of impairments and property disposition gains related to such entities, which we report separately in the consolidated statements of income. Certain investments in real estate partnerships that were acquired in business combinations were determined to have insignificant value at the acquisition date and are accounted for under the cost method. Any distributions received from such partnerships are recognized as income when received.
The excess of the cost of the acquired partnership interests over the historical carrying amount of partners’ equity or deficit is ascribed generally to the fair values of land and buildings owned by the partnerships. We amortize the excess cost related to the buildings over the estimated useful lives of the buildings. Such amortization is recorded as a component of equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated real estate partnerships.
F-19
Table of Contents
Intangible Assets
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, other assets included goodwill associated with our real estate segment of $81.9 million. We account for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, or SFAS 142. SFAS 142 does not permit amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives, but requires an annual impairment test of such assets. The impairment test compares the fair value of reporting units with their carrying amounts, including goodwill. Based on the application of the goodwill impairment test set forth in SFAS 142, we determined that our goodwill was not impaired in 2008, 2007 or 2006.
Other assets also includes intangible assets for purchased management contracts with finite lives that we amortize on a straight-line basis over terms ranging from five to twenty years and intangible assets for in-place leases as discussed underAcquisition of Real Estate Assets and Related Depreciation and Amortization.
Capitalized Software Costs
Purchased software and other costs related to software developed for internal use are capitalized during the application development stage and are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, generally five years. We write off the costs of software development projects when it is no longer probable that the software will be completed and placed in service. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we capitalized software development costs totaling $20.9 million, $11.9 million and $6.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, other assets included $35.7 million and $29.0 million of net capitalized software, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we recognized amortization of capitalized software of $10.0 million, $10.8 million and $14.5 million, respectively, which is included in depreciation and amortization in our consolidated statements of income.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we reassessed our approach to communication technology needs at our properties, which resulted in the discontinuation of an infrastructure project and a $5.4 million write-off of related hardware and capitalized internal and consulting costs included in other assets. The write-off, which is net of sales proceeds, is included in other (income) expenses, net. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we additionally recorded a $1.6 million write-off of certain software and hardware assets that are no longer consistent with our information technology strategy. This write-off is included in depreciation and amortization. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we abandoned certain internal-use software development projects and recorded a $4.2 million write-off of the capitalized costs of such projects in depreciation and amortization. There were no similar write-offs during the year ended December 31, 2006.
Minority Interest in Consolidated Real Estate Partnerships
We report unaffiliated partners’ interests in consolidated real estate partnerships as minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships. Minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships represents the minority partners’ share of the underlying net assets of our consolidated real estate partnerships. When these consolidated real estate partnerships make cash distributions to partners in excess of the carrying amount of the minority interest, we generally record a charge equal to the amount of such excess distribution, even though there is no economic effect or cost. We report this charge in the consolidated statements of income as deficit distributions to minority partners. We allocate the minority partners’ share of partnership losses to minority partners to the extent of the carrying amount of the minority interest. We generally record a charge when the minority partners’ share of partnership losses exceed the carrying amount of the minority interest, even though there is no economic effect or cost. We report this charge in the consolidated statements of income within minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships. We do not record charges for distributions or losses in certain limited instances where the minority partner has a legal obligation and financial capacity to contribute additional capital to the partnership. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we recorded charges for partnership losses resulting from depreciation of approximately $9.0 million, $12.2 million and $31.8 million respectively, that were not allocated to minority partners because the losses exceeded the carrying amount of the minority interest.
F-20
Table of Contents
Minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships consists primarily of equity interests held by limited partners in consolidated real estate partnerships that have finite lives. The terms of the related partnership agreements generally require the partnership to be liquidated following the sale of the partnership’s real estate. As the general partner in these partnerships, we ordinarily control the execution of real estate sales and other events that could lead to the liquidation, redemption or other settlement of minority interests. The aggregate carrying value of minority interests in consolidated real estate partnerships is approximately $349.5 million at December 31, 2008. The aggregate fair value of these interests varies based on the fair value of the real estate owned by the partnerships. Based on the number of classes of finite-life minority interests, the number of properties in which there is direct or indirect minority ownership, complexities in determining the allocation of liquidation proceeds among partners and other factors, we believe it is impracticable to determine the total required payments to the minority interests in an assumed liquidation at December 31, 2008. As a result of real estate depreciation that is recognized in our financial statements and appreciation in the fair value of real estate that is not recognized in our financial statements, we believe that the aggregate fair value of our minority interests exceeds their aggregate carrying value. As a result of our ability to control real estate sales and other events that require payment of minority interests and our expectation that proceeds from real estate sales will be sufficient to liquidate related minority interests, we anticipate that the eventual liquidation of these minority interests will not have an adverse impact on our financial condition.
Revenue Recognition
Our properties have operating leases with apartment residents with terms generally of twelve months or less. We recognize rental revenue related to these leases, net of any concessions, on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. We recognize revenues from property management, asset management, syndication and other services when the related fees are earned and are realized or realizable.
Stock-Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),Share-Based Payment,or SFAS 123R (see Note 12).
Discontinued Operations
In accordance with SFAS 144, we classify certain properties and related liabilities as held for sale (see Note 13). The operating results of such properties as well as those properties sold during the periods presented are included in discontinued operations in both current periods and all comparable periods presented. Depreciation is not recorded on properties held for sale; however, depreciation expense recorded prior to classification as held for sale is included in discontinued operations. The net gain on sale and any impairment losses are presented in discontinued operations when recognized.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We primarily use long-term, fixed-rate and self-amortizing non-recourse debt to avoid, among other things, risk related to fluctuating interest rates. For our variable rate debt, we are sometimes required by our lenders to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations by entering into interest rate swap or cap agreements. The interest rate swap agreements moderate our exposure to interest rate risk by effectively converting the interest on variable rate debt to a fixed rate. The interest rate cap agreements effectively limit our exposure to interest rate risk by providing a ceiling on the underlying variable interest rate. The fair values of these instruments are reflected as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet, and periodic changes in fair value are included in interest expense. These instruments are not material to our financial position and results of operations.
From time to time, we enter into total rate of return swaps on various fixed rate secured tax-exempt bonds payable and fixed rate notes payable to convert these borrowings from a fixed rate to a variable rate and provide an efficient financing product to lower our cost of borrowing. In exchange for our receipt of a fixed rate generally equal to the underlying borrowing’s interest rate, the total rate of return swaps require that we pay a variable rate, equivalent to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index, or SIFMA, rate (previously the Bond Market Association index) for tax-exempt bonds payable and the 30-day LIBOR rate for notes payable, plus a risk spread. These swaps generally have a second or third lien on the property collateralized by the related borrowings and the obligations under certain of these swaps are cross-collateralized with certain of the other swaps with a particular counterparty. The underlying borrowings are generally callable at our option, with no prepayment penalty, with 30 days advance notice, and the swaps generally have a term of less than five years. The total rate of return swaps have a contractually defined termination value generally equal to the difference between the fair value and the counterparty’s purchased value of the underlying borrowings, which may require payment by us or to us for such difference. Accordingly, we believe fluctuations in the fair value of the borrowings from the inception of the hedging relationship generally will be offset by a corresponding fluctuation in the fair value of the total rate of return swaps.
F-21
Table of Contents
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, or SFAS 133, we designate total rate of return swaps as hedges of the risk of overall changes in the fair value of the underlying borrowings. At each reporting period, we estimate the fair value of these borrowings and the total rate of return swaps and recognize any changes therein as an adjustment of interest expense. We evaluate the effectiveness of these fair value hedges at the end of each reporting period and recognize an adjustment of interest expense as a result of any ineffectiveness.
Borrowings payable subject to total rate of return swaps with aggregate outstanding principal balances of $421.7 million and $487.2 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are reflected as variable rate borrowings in Note 6. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, due to changes in the estimated fair values of certain of these debt instruments and corresponding total rate of return swaps, we reduced property loans payable by $20.1 million and $9.4 million respectively, and increased accrued liabilities and other by the same amount, with no net impact on net income. During 2006 there were no material adjustments for changes in fair value for the hedged debt or total rate of return swaps. SeeAdoption of SFAS 157in Note 2 for further discussion of fair value measurements related to these arrangements. During 2008, 2007 and 2006, we determined these hedges were fully effective and accordingly we made no adjustments to interest expense for ineffectiveness.
At December 31, 2008, the weighted average fixed receive rate under the total return swaps was 6.8% and the weighted average variable pay rate was 1.8%, based on the applicable SIFMA and 30-day LIBOR rates effective as of that date. Further information related to our total return swaps as of December 31, 2008 is as follows:
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Swap Notional | Swap | Swap | |||||||||||||||||||
Debt Principal | Year of Debt | Average Debt | Amount | Maturity | Variable Pay Rate at | |||||||||||||||||
(millions) | Maturity | Interest Rate | (millions) | Date | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 26.1 | 2009 | 9.0 | % | $ | 26.3 | 2009 | 2.1 | % | |||||||||||||
60.0 | 2012 | 7.5 | % | 60.0 | 2012 | 2.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
24.0 | 2015 | 6.9 | % | 24.0 | 2011 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
14.2 | 2018 | 7.3 | % | 14.2 | 2011 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
12.3 | 2021 | 6.2 | % | 12.3 | 2012 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
12.0 | 2024 | 6.3 | % | 12.0 | 2011 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
54.6 | 2025 | 5.5 | % | 54.4 | 2011 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
47.9 | 2026 | 7.4 | % | 47.9 | 2011 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
45.0 | 2031 | 7.4 | % | 45.0 | 2011 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
100.6 | 2036 | 6.2 | % | 101.0 | 2010-2012 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
12.5 | 2038 | 6.5 | % | 12.5 | 2011 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||||
12.5 | 2048 | 5.5 | % | 12.5 | 2011 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||||
$ | 421.7 | $ | 422.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Insurance
We believe that our insurance coverages insure our properties adequately against the risk of loss attributable to fire, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood, and other perils. In addition, we have insurance coverage for substantial portions of our property, workers’ compensation, health, and general liability exposures. Losses are accrued based upon our estimates of the aggregate liability for uninsured losses incurred using certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and based on our experience.
Income Taxes
We are treated as a “pass-through” entity for United States Federal income tax purposes and are not subject to United States Federal income taxation. Each of our partners, however, is subject to tax on his allocable share of partnership tax items, including partnership income, gains, losses, deductions and credits, or Partnership Tax Items, for each taxable year during which he is a partner, regardless of whether he receives any actual distributions of cash or other property from us during the taxable year. Generally, the characterization of any particular Partnership Tax Item is determined by us, rather than at the partner level, and the amount of a partner’s allocable share of such item is governed by the terms of the Partnership Agreement. The General Partner is our “tax matters partner” for United States Federal income tax purposes. The tax matters partner is authorized, but not required, to take certain actions on behalf of us with respect to tax matters.
F-22
Table of Contents
Aimco has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1994, and intends to continue to operate in such a manner. Aimco’s current and continuing qualification as a REIT depends on its ability to meet the various requirements imposed by the Code, which are related to organizational structure, distribution levels, diversity of stock ownership and certain restrictions with regard to owned assets and categories of income. If Aimco qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it will generally not be subject to United States Federal corporate income tax on our taxable income that is currently distributed to stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” (at the corporate and stockholder levels) that generally results from an investment in a corporation.
Even if Aimco qualifies as a REIT, it may be subject to United States Federal income and excise taxes in various situations, such as on our undistributed income. Aimco also will be required to pay a 100% tax on any net income on non-arms length transactions between it and a TRS (described below) and on any net income from sales of property that was property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course. Aimco and its stockholders may be subject to state or local taxation in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which Aimco transacts business or Aimco’s stockholders reside. In addition, Aimco could also be subject to the alternative minimum tax, or AMT, on our items of tax preference. The state and local tax laws may not conform to the United States Federal income tax treatment. Any taxes imposed on Aimco reduce its and our operating cash flow and net income.
Certain of Aimco’s operations (including property management, asset management and risk) are conducted through taxable REIT subsidiaries, which are subsidiaries of the Partnership, and each of which we refer to as a TRS. A TRS is a C-corporation that has not elected REIT status and as such is subject to United States Federal corporate income tax. Aimco uses TRS entities to facilitate its ability to offer certain services and activities to its residents, as these services and activities generally cannot be offered directly by the REIT. Aimco also uses TRS entities to hold investments in certain properties.
For Aimco’s taxable REIT subsidiaries, deferred income taxes result from temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for Federal income tax purposes, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences reverse. We reduce deferred tax assets by recording a valuation allowance when we determine based on available evidence that it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. We recognize the tax consequences associated with intercompany transfers between the REIT and TRS entities when the related assets are sold to third parties, impaired or otherwise disposed of for financial reporting purposes.
In March 2008, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service that it intended to examine our 2006 Federal tax return. During June 2008, the IRS issued AIMCO-GP, Inc., our general and tax matters partner, a summary report including the IRS’s proposed adjustments to our 2006 Federal tax return. We do not expect the proposed adjustments to have any material effect on our unrecognized tax benefits, financial condition or results of operations.
Earnings per Unit
We calculate earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of common OP Units, common unit equivalents, and other potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. As discussed in Note 1, weighted average common OP Units, common unit equivalents and other potentially dilutive securities outstanding have been retroactively adjusted for the effect of common OP Units issued January 30, 2008, August 29, 2008, December 1, 2008, and January 29, 2009, pursuant to the special distributions. Earnings per unit amounts for each period presented reflect the retroactively adjusted weighted average unit and equivalent counts.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially could subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of notes receivable and total rate of return swaps. As discussed in Note 5, a significant portion of our notes receivable at December 31, 2008, are collateralized by properties in the West Harlem area of New York City. There are no other significant concentrations of credit risk with respect to our notes receivable due to the large number of partnerships that are borrowers under the notes and the geographic diversity of the properties that collateralize the notes.
F-23
Table of Contents
At December 31, 2008, we had total rate of return swap positions with two financial institutions totaling $422.1 million. The swap positions with one counterparty are comprised of $409.8 million of fixed rate debt effectively converted to variable rates using total rate of return swaps, including $349.8 million of tax-exempt bonds indexed to SIFMA and $60.0 million of taxable second mortgage notes indexed to LIBOR. Additionally, the swap agreements with this counterparty provide for collateral calls to maintain specified loan-to-value ratios. As of December 31, 2008, we had provided this counterparty $3.2 million in cash collateral, which is included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheet. We have one swap position with another counterparty that is comprised of $12.3 million of fixed rate tax-exempt bonds indexed to SIFMA. We periodically evaluate counterparty credit risk associated with these arrangements. At the current time, we have concluded we do not have material exposure. In the event either counterparty were to default under these arrangements, loss of the net interest benefit we generally receive under these arrangements, which is equal to the difference between the fixed rate we receive and the variable rate we pay, may adversely impact our results of operations and operating cash flows. In the event the values of the real estate properties serving as collateral under these agreements decline, we may be required to provide additional collateral pursuant to the swap agreements, which would adversely affect our cash flows.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts included in the financial statements and accompanying notes thereto. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain items included in the 2007 and 2006 financial statements amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation.
NOTE 3 — Real Estate and Partnership Acquisitions and Other Significant Transactions
Real Estate Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we acquired three conventional properties with a total of 470 units, located in San Jose, California, Brighton, Massachusetts and Seattle, Washington. The aggregate purchase price of $111.5 million, excluding transaction costs, was funded using $39.0 million in proceeds from mortgage loans, $41.9 million in tax-free exchange proceeds (provided by 2008 real estate dispositions) and the remainder in cash.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we completed the acquisition of 16 conventional properties with approximately 1,300 units for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $217.0 million, excluding transaction costs. Of the 16 properties acquired, ten are located in New York City, New York, two in Daytona Beach, Florida, one in Park Forest, Illinois, one in Poughkeepsie, New York, one in Redwood City, California, and one in North San Diego, California. The purchases were funded with cash, tax-free exchange proceeds, new debt and the assumption of existing debt.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we completed acquisitions of nine properties (including one property acquired by an unconsolidated joint venture), containing approximately 1,700 residential units for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $177.0 million, excluding transaction costs. Of the nine properties acquired, three are located in Pacifica, California, one in Chico, California, three in metro Jacksonville, Florida, one in Tampa, Florida, and one in Greenville, North Carolina. The purchases were funded with cash, new debt and the assumption of existing debt.
Acquisitions of Partnership Interests
During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we acquired limited partnership interests in 22 and 50 partnerships respectively, in which our affiliates served as general partner. In connection with such acquisitions, we paid cash of approximately $2.0 million and $47.4 million, including transaction costs. The cost of the acquisitions was approximately $2.4 million and $43.6 million in excess of the carrying amount of minority interest in such limited partnerships, which excess we generally assigned to real estate.
Disposition of Unconsolidated Real Estate
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we disposed of our interest in unconsolidated real estate partnerships that owned two properties with 671 units. Our net gain on the disposition of these interests totaled $98.4 million and is included in gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other in the accompanying statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Casualty Loss Related to Tropical Storm Fay and Hurricane Ike
During 2008, Tropical Storm Fay and Hurricane Ike caused severe damage to certain of our properties located primarily in Florida and Texas, respectively. We estimated total losses of approximately $33.9 million, including property damage replacement cost and clean-up cost. After consideration of estimated third party insurance proceeds and the minority interest partners’ share of losses for consolidated real estate partnerships, the net effect of these casualties on net income was a loss of approximately $5.6 million.
F-24
Table of Contents
Restructuring Costs
In connection with 2008 property sales and an expected reduction in redevelopment and transactional activities, during the three months ended December 31, 2008, we initiated an organizational restructuring program that included reductions in workforce and related costs, reductions in leased corporate facilities and abandonment of certain redevelopment projects and business pursuits. As a result, during the three months ended December 31, 2008, we recognized a restructuring charge of $22.8 million, which consists primarily of: severance costs of $12.9 million; unrecoverable lease obligations of $6.4 million related to space that we will no longer use; and the write-off of deferred transaction costs totaling $3.5 million associated with certain acquisitions and redevelopment opportunities that we will no longer pursue. Of the amounts included in the restructuring charge, approximately $2.9 million of the severance costs and the $3.5 million of transaction costs had been paid as of December 31, 2008. We anticipate eliminating the remaining jobs associated with the severance amounts discussed above by March 1, 2009. The amounts related to this restructuring have not been allocated to our reportable segments based on the methods used to evaluate segment performance.
Transactions Involving VMS National Properties Joint Venture
In January 2007, VMS National Properties Joint Venture, or VMS, a consolidated real estate partnership in which we held a 22% equity interest, refinanced mortgage loans secured by its 15 apartment properties. The existing loans had an aggregate carrying amount of $110.0 million and an aggregate face amount of $152.2 million. The $42.2 million difference between the face amount and carrying amount resulted from a 1997 bankruptcy settlement in which the lender agreed to reduce the principal amount of the loans subject to VMS’s compliance with the terms of the restructured loans. Because the reduction in the loan amount was contingent on future compliance, recognition of the inherent debt extinguishment gain was deferred. Upon refinancing of the loans in January 2007, the existing lender accepted the reduced principal amount in full satisfaction of the loans, and VMS recognized the $42.2 million debt extinguishment gain in earnings.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, VMS sold eight properties to third parties for an aggregate gain of $22.7 million. Additionally, VMS contributed its seven remaining properties to wholly-owned subsidiaries of Aimco in exchange for consideration totaling $230.1 million, consisting primarily of cash of $21.3 million, common OP Units with a fair value of $9.8 million, the assumption of $168.0 million in mortgage debt, and the assumption of $30.9 million in mortgage participation liabilities. This total consideration included $50.7 million related to our 22% equity interest in VMS. Exclusive of our share, the consideration paid for the seven properties exceeded the carrying amount of the minority interest in such properties by $44.9 million. This excess consideration is reflected in our consolidated balance sheet as an increase in the carrying amount of the seven properties.
In connection with VMS’s sale of seven properties to our wholly-owned subsidiaries, we issued 178,500 common OP Units to the limited partners in VMS. As a limited partner in VMS, we received approximately 123,400 common OP Units, which we eliminate in our consolidated financial statements. Common OP Units issued to unrelated limited partners in VMS totaled 55,100 and had an aggregate fair value of $3.0 million.
Approximately $22.8 million of the $42.2 million debt extinguishment gain related to the mortgage loans that were secured by the eight properties sold to third parties and is reported in discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2007. The remaining $19.4 million portion of the debt extinguishment gain related to the mortgage loans that were secured by the seven VMS properties we purchased and is reported in our continuing operations as gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other. Although 78% of the equity interests in VMS were held by unrelated minority partners, no minority interest share of the gains on debt extinguishment and sale of the properties was recognized in our earnings. As required by GAAP, we had in prior years recognized the minority partners’ share of VMS losses in excess of the minority partners’ capital contributions. The amounts of those previously recognized losses exceeded the minority partners’ share of the gains on debt extinguishment and sale of the properties; accordingly, no minority interest in such gains has been recognized in our earnings. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the aggregate effect of the gains on extinguishment of VMS debt and sale of VMS properties was to decrease loss from continuing operations by $19.4 million ($0.13 per diluted unit) and increase net income by $65.0 million ($0.43 per diluted unit).
F-25
Table of Contents
During the three months ended December 31, 2007, VMS distributed its remaining cash, consisting primarily of undistributed proceeds from the sale of its 15 properties (including properties sold to us). Of the $42.4 million of cash distributed to the unrelated limited partners, $21.3 million represents the cash consideration we contributed in exchange for the purchase of seven properties and is presented in purchases of partnership interests and other assets in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007. The remainder of the cash distributed to the unrelated limited partners is presented in payment of distributions to minority interest in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Flamingo South Beach Property
The Flamingo South Beach property consists of three towers. In connection with the sale of the South Tower in 2006, the buyer paid to us a $5.0 million non-refundable fee for the option to purchase the 614-unit North Tower between September 1, 2006, and February 28, 2007, and the 513-unit Central Tower between December 1, 2007, and May 31, 2008. Pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement, the buyer paid to us an additional $1.0 million non-refundable fee to extend the option period for the buyer’s purchase of the North Tower from February 28, 2007, to October 31, 2007. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 66,Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, or SFAS 66, we deferred the recognition of the non-refundable fees. In September 2007, the buyer terminated its rights under the option agreement and we recognized income of $6.0 million ($5.5 million net of tax) during the year ended December 31, 2007, which is presented in gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
Palazzo Joint Venture
In December 2007, we entered into a joint venture agreement with a third party investor which provides for the co-ownership of three multi-family properties with 1,382 units located in West Los Angeles. Under the agreement, we contributed three wholly-owned properties, The Palazzo at Park La Brea, The Palazzo East at Park La Brea and The Villas at Park La Brea to the partnership, which we refer to as Palazzo, at a value of $726.0 million, or approximately $525,000 per unit. Palazzo had existing property debt of approximately $296.0 million and an implied equity value of approximately $430.0 million. We received $202.0 million from the investor in exchange for an approximate 47% interest in Palazzo, of which approximately $7.9 million was used to fund escrows for capital improvements and various operating requirements. We own the remaining interests in Palazzo, including a managing interest, and will operate the properties in exchange for a property management fee and certain other fees over the term of the partnership.
We determined Palazzo is a VIE as defined by FIN 46 and that we are the primary beneficiary who should consolidate this partnership. In accordance with SFAS 66, we deferred recognition of a gain on this transaction and recognized the consideration received as an increase in minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships.
NOTE 4 — Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Partnerships
We owned general and limited partner interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships owning approximately 85, 94 and 102 properties at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We acquired these interests through various transactions, including large portfolio acquisitions and offers to individual limited partners. Our total ownership interests in these unconsolidated real estate partnerships ranges typically from less than 1% to 50%.
The following table provides selected combined financial information for the unconsolidated real estate partnerships in which we had investments accounted for under the equity method as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation | $ | 122,788 | $ | 133,544 | $ | 143,750 | ||||||
Total assets | 155,444 | 165,567 | 169,061 | |||||||||
Secured and other notes payable | 122,859 | 124,406 | 132,076 | |||||||||
Total liabilities | 175,681 | 180,222 | 183,378 | |||||||||
Partners’ deficit | (20,237 | ) | (14,655 | ) | (14,317 | ) | ||||||
Rental and other property revenues | 69,392 | 73,672 | 102,241 | |||||||||
Property operating expenses | (42,863 | ) | (45,998 | ) | (59,017 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation expense | (12,640 | ) | (13,965 | ) | (19,198 | ) | ||||||
Interest expense | (17,182 | ) | (17,194 | ) | (24,338 | ) | ||||||
Gain on sale | 5,391 | 59 | 3,156 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | 1,398 | (4,845 | ) | 2,369 |
F-26
Table of Contents
As a result of our acquisition of interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships at a cost in excess of the historical carrying amount of the partnerships’ net assets, our aggregate investment in these partnerships at December 31, 2008 and 2007 of $108.2 million and $116.1 million, respectively, exceeds our share of the underlying historical partners’ deficit of the partnerships by approximately $112.1 million and $119.3 million, respectively.
NOTE 5 — Notes Receivable
The following table summarizes our notes receivable at December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated | Unconsolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate | Non- | Real Estate | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Partnerships | Affiliates | Total | Partnerships | Affiliates | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Par value notes | $ | 18,855 | $ | 19,253 | $ | 38,108 | $ | 30,155 | $ | 17,053 | $ | 47,208 | ||||||||||||
Discounted notes | 8,575 | 135,123 | 143,698 | 10,045 | 127,422 | 137,467 | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (4,863 | ) | (17,743 | ) | (22,606 | ) | (5,014 | ) | (1,421 | ) | (6,435 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total notes receivable | $ | 22,567 | $ | 136,633 | $ | 159,200 | $ | 35,186 | $ | 143,054 | $ | 178,240 | ||||||||||||
Face value of discounted notes | $ | 39,333 | $ | 145,526 | $ | 184,859 | $ | 41,668 | $ | 142,062 | $ | 183,730 |
Included in notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships at December 31, 2008 and 2007, are $4.2 million and $4.3 million, respectively, in notes that were secured by interests in real estate or interests in real estate partnerships. We earn interest on these secured notes receivable at various annual interest rates ranging between 9.0% and 12.0% and averaging 11.1%.
Included in the notes receivable from non-affiliates at December 31, 2008 and 2007, are $92.6 million and $87.6 million, respectively, in notes that were secured by interests in real estate or interests in real estate partnerships. We earn interest on these secured notes receivable at various annual interest rates ranging between 4.0% and 8.8% and averaging 6.0%.
Notes receivable from non-affiliates at December 31, 2008 and 2007, include notes receivable totaling $85.6 million and $84.3 million, respectively, from 31 entities (the “borrowers”) that are wholly owned by a single individual. We originated these notes in November 2006 pursuant to a loan agreement that provides for total funding of approximately $110.0 million, including $16.4 million for property improvements and an interest reserve, of which $5.6 million had not been funded as of December 31, 2008. The notes mature in November 2016, bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.0%, are partially guaranteed by the owner of the borrowers, and are collateralized by second mortgages on 87 buildings containing 1,597 residential units and 42 commercial spaces in West Harlem, New York City. In conjunction with the loan agreement, we entered into a purchase option and put agreement with the borrowers under which we may purchase some or all of the buildings and, subject to achieving specified increases in rental income, the borrowers may require us to purchase the buildings. Our potential purchase of the buildings pursuant to the purchase option and put agreement may ultimately require cash payments and/or assumption of first mortgage debt totaling approximately $149.0 million to $216.0 million, in addition to amounts funded and committed under the loan agreement, depending on rental income levels and real estate fair values. We determined that the stated interest rate on the notes was a below-market interest rate and recorded a $19.4 million discount to reflect the estimated fair value of the notes based on an estimated market interest rate of LIBOR plus 4.0%. The discount was determined to be attributable to our real estate purchase option, which we recorded separately in other assets. Accretion of this discount, which is included in interest income in our consolidated statements of income, totaled $0.7 million in 2008, and $1.9 million in 2007, inclusive of a $1.5 million adjustment of accretion recognized upon the repayment of a portion of the outstanding principal balance in 2007. No accretion of this discount was recorded in 2006. The value of the purchase option asset will be included in the cost of properties acquired pursuant to the option or otherwise be charged to expense. We determined that the borrowers are VIEs and, based on qualitative and quantitative analysis, determined that the individual who owns the borrowers and partially guarantees the notes is the primary beneficiary.
F-27
Table of Contents
In connection with the March 2002 acquisition of Casden Properties, Inc., we invested $50.0 million for a 20% passive interest in Casden Properties LLC, an entity organized to buy, re-entitle and develop land parcels in Southern California. Based upon the profit allocation agreement, we account for this investment as a note receivable and have been amortizing the discounted value of the investment to the $50.0 million previously estimated to be collectible through January 2, 2009, the initial dissolution date of the entity. The managing member is seeking to extend the dissolution date. In connection with the preparation of our annual financial statements and as a result of a recent decline in Southern California land values, we determined our investment was not fully recoverable and accordingly recognized an impairment loss of $16.3 million ($10.0 million net of tax) during the three months ended December 31, 2008. This impairment loss is included in provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Interest income from total non-impaired par value and certain discounted notes for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled $7.8 million, $11.7 million and $5.8 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized a net reduction of accretion income of $2.7 million, due primarily to revisions in estimates of the timing and amount of payment on certain discounted notes. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we recognized accretion income on certain discounted notes of $3.4 million and $6.7 million, respectively.
The activity in the allowance for loan losses in total for both par value notes and discounted notes for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, is as follows (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | (6,435 | ) | $ | (5,478 | ) | ||
Provisions for losses on notes receivable | (4,608 | ) | (6,018 | ) | ||||
Recoveries of losses on notes receivable | 429 | 2,067 | ||||||
Provision for impairment loss on investment in Casden Properties LLC | (16,321 | ) | — | |||||
Net reductions due to consolidation of real estate partnerships and property dispositions | 4,329 | 2,994 | ||||||
Balance at end of year | $ | (22,606 | ) | $ | (6,435 | ) | ||
During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we determined that an allowance for loan losses of $3.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively, was required on certain of our par value notes that had carrying values of $11.4 million and $9.5 million, respectively. The average recorded investment in the impaired par value notes for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $9.0 million and $8.3 million, respectively. The remaining $26.7 million in par value notes receivable at December 31, 2008, is estimated to be collectible and, therefore, interest income on these par value notes is recognized as it is earned.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, we determined that an allowance for loan losses of $2.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, was required on certain of our discounted notes that had carrying values of $5.4 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The average recorded investment in the impaired discounted notes for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $4.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
NOTE 6 — Property Tax-Exempt Bond Financings, Property Loans Payable and Other Borrowings
The following table summarizes our property tax-exempt bond financings at December 31, 2008 and 2007, the majority of which is non-recourse to us (in thousands):
Weighted Average | Principal | |||||||||||
Interest Rate | Outstanding | |||||||||||
2008 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Fixed rate property tax-exempt bonds payable | 5.59% | $ | 158,620 | $ | 159,893 | |||||||
Variable rate property tax-exempt bonds payable | 1.74% | 563,351 | 596,549 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 721,971 | $ | 756,442 | ||||||||
Fixed rate property tax-exempt bonds payable mature at various dates through October 2045. Variable rate property tax-exempt bonds payable mature at various dates through June 2048. Principal and interest on these bonds are generally payable in semi-annual installments or in monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. Certain of our property tax-exempt bonds at December 31, 2008, are remarketed periodically by a remarketing agent to maintain a variable yield. If the remarketing agent is unable to remarket the bonds, then the remarketing agent can put the bonds to us. We believe that the likelihood of this occurring is remote. At December 31, 2008, our property tax-exempt bond financings were secured by 52 properties with a combined net book value of $1,081.0 million. As discussed in Note 2, certain fixed rate property tax-exempt bonds payable have been converted to variable rates using total rate of return swaps and are presented above as variable rate debt.
F-28
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes our property loans payable at December 31, 2008 and 2007, the majority of which are non-recourse to us (in thousands):
Weighted Average | Principal | |||||||||||
Interest Rate | Outstanding | |||||||||||
2008 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Fixed rate property notes payable | 6.06% | $ | 5,223,522 | $ | 4,757,536 | |||||||
Variable rate property notes payable | 6.05% | 223,560 | 254,061 | |||||||||
Secured notes credit facility | 1.22% | 112,087 | 84,876 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 5,559,169 | $ | 5,096,473 | ||||||||
Fixed rate property notes payable mature at various dates through August 2053. Variable rate property notes payable mature at various dates through December 2031. Principal and interest are generally payable monthly or in monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. At December 31, 2008, our property notes payable were secured by 445 properties with a combined net book value of $6,925.1 million. As discussed in Note 2, certain fixed rate secured notes payable have been converted to variable rates using total rate of return swaps and are presented above as variable rate debt.
We had a secured revolving credit facility that provided for borrowings of up to $250.0 million primarily to be used for financing properties that we generally intended to hold for the intermediate term, as well as properties that were designated for redevelopment. The interest rate on the notes provided through this facility was the Fannie Mae Discounted Mortgage-Backed Security index plus 0.85% (for those loans with debt coverage ratios greater than or equal to 1.70x) or 1.05% (for those loans with debt service coverage ratios less than 1.70x), which interest rates reset monthly. Each loan under this facility was treated as a separate borrowing and was collateralized by a specific property, and none of the loans were cross-collateralized or cross-defaulted. This facility matured in September 2007.
We entered into a new secured revolving credit facility in September 2007 with a major life company that provides for borrowings of up to $200.0 million. The primary function of the facility is to secure short-term fully pre-payable non-recourse loans for a period of less than three years. The interest rate on the notes provided through the facility is 30-day LIBOR plus 0.78%. Each loan under the facility is treated as a separate borrowing and is secured by a specific property. None of the facility loans are cross-collateralized or cross-defaulted. This facility matures in October 2010, and has two one-year extension options for a $500,000 fee per extension. At December 31, 2008, outstanding borrowings of $112.1 million related to properties classified as held for use are included in 2012 maturities below based on the extension options. At December 31, 2008, outstanding borrowings of $16.2 million related to properties classified as held for sale are included in liabilities related to assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet.
Our consolidated debt instruments generally contain covenants common to the type of facility or borrowing, including financial covenants establishing minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum leverage ratios. At December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with all financial covenants pertaining to our consolidated debt instruments.
Other borrowings totaled $96.0 million and $75.1 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and consist primarily of unsecured notes payable and obligations under sale and leaseback arrangements accounted for as financings. At December 31, 2008, other borrowings includes $85.5 million in fixed rate obligations with interest rates ranging from zero to 10.0% and $10.5 million in variable rate obligations bearing interest at the prime rate plus 1.75% to 2.00%. The maturity dates for other borrowings range from 2008 to 2039, although certain amounts are due upon occurrence of specified events, such as property sales.
F-29
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2008, the scheduled principal amortization and maturity payments for our property tax-exempt bonds, property loans payable and other borrowings are as follows (in thousands):
Amortization | Maturities | Total | ||||||||||
2009 | $ | 116,028 | $ | 291,865 | $ | 407,893 | ||||||
2010 | 121,746 | 285,492 | 407,238 | |||||||||
2011 | 130,394 | 181,092 | 311,486 | |||||||||
2012 | 134,248 | 353,811 | 488,059 | |||||||||
2013 | 131,157 | 474,805 | 605,962 | |||||||||
Thereafter | 4,156,483 | |||||||||||
$ | 6,377,121 | |||||||||||
NOTE 7 — Term Loans and Credit Facility
We have an Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions, which we refer to as the Credit Agreement. In addition to us, Aimco and an Aimco subsidiary are also borrowers under the Credit Agreement.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we repaid in full our $75.0 million term loan which was due for payment in September 2009. Following this repayment, the aggregate amount of commitments and loans under the Credit Agreement is $1,035.0 million, comprised of a $400.0 million term loan and $635.0 million of revolving loan commitments. The $400.0 million term loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.5%, or at our option, a base rate equal to the prime rate and matures March 2011. Our revolving credit facility matures May 2009 and may be extended for an additional year, subject to a 20.0 basis point fee on the total commitments. Borrowings under the revolver bear interest based on a pricing grid determined by leverage (currently at LIBOR plus 1.125%).
The Credit Agreement includes customary financial covenants, including the maintenance of specified ratios with respect to total indebtedness to gross asset value, total secured indebtedness to gross asset value, aggregate recourse indebtedness to gross asset value, variable rate debt to total indebtedness, debt service coverage and fixed charge coverage; the maintenance of a minimum adjusted tangible net worth; and limitations regarding the amount of cross-collateralized debt. The Credit Agreement includes other customary covenants, including a restriction on distributions and other restricted payments, but permits distributions during any four consecutive fiscal quarters in an aggregate amount of up to 95% of our funds from operations for such period, subject to certain non-cash adjustments, or such amount as may be necessary to maintain Aimco’s REIT status. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of December 31, 2008.
The lenders under the Credit Agreement may accelerate any outstanding loans if, among other things: we fail to make payments when due (subject to applicable grace periods); material defaults occur under other debt agreements; certain bankruptcy or insolvency events occur; material judgments are entered against us; we fail to comply with certain covenants, such as the requirement to deliver financial information or the requirement to provide notices regarding material events (subject to applicable grace periods in some cases); indebtedness is incurred in violation of the covenants; or prohibited liens arise.
At December 31, 2008, the term loan had an outstanding principal balance of $400.0 million and a weighted average interest rate of 2.94%. In January 2009, we prepaid $50.0 million of the balance outstanding on the term debt. The amount available under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2008, was $578.8 million (after giving effect to $56.2 million outstanding for undrawn letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facility). The proceeds of revolving loans are generally permitted to be used to fund working capital and for other corporate purposes.
NOTE 8 — Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
In connection with our redevelopment and capital improvement activities, we have commitments of approximately $70.3 million related to construction projects, most of which we expect to incur in 2009. Additionally, we enter into certain commitments for future purchases of goods and services in connection with the operations of our properties. Those commitments generally have terms of one year or less and reflect expenditure levels comparable to our historical expenditures.
As discussed in Note 5, we have committed to fund an additional $5.6 million in second mortgage loans on certain properties in West Harlem in New York City. In certain circumstances, we also could be required to acquire the properties for cash and/or assumption of first mortgage debt totaling approximately $149.0 million to $216.0 million, in addition to amounts funded and committed under the related loan agreement.
F-30
Table of Contents
Tax Credit Arrangements
We are required to manage certain consolidated real estate partnerships in compliance with various laws, regulations and contractual provisions that apply to our historic and low-income housing tax credit syndication arrangements. In some instances, noncompliance with applicable requirements could result in projected tax benefits not being realized and require a refund or reduction of investor capital contributions, which are reported as deferred income in our consolidated balance sheet, until such time as our obligation to deliver tax benefits is relieved. The remaining compliance periods for our tax credit syndication arrangements range from less than one year to 15 years. We do not anticipate that any material refunds or reductions of investor capital contributions will be required in connection with these arrangements.
Legal Matters
In addition to the matters described below, we are a party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are covered by our general liability insurance program, and none of which we expect to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Limited Partnerships
In connection with our acquisitions of interests in real estate partnerships, we are sometimes subject to legal actions, including allegations that such activities may involve breaches of fiduciary duties to the partners of such real estate partnerships or violations of the relevant partnership agreements. We may incur costs in connection with the defense or settlement of such litigation. We believe that we comply with our fiduciary obligations and relevant partnership agreements. Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, we do not expect any such legal actions to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property, including lead-based paint. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of properties, we could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with our properties or properties we acquire or manage in the future.
We have determined that our legal obligations to remove or remediate hazardous substances may be conditional asset retirement obligations, as defined in FASB Interpretation No. 47,Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations. Except in limited circumstances where the asset retirement activities are expected to be performed in connection with a planned construction project or property casualty, we believe that the fair value of our asset retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated due to significant uncertainties in the timing and manner of settlement of those obligations. Asset retirement obligations that are reasonably estimable as of December 31, 2008, are immaterial to our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Mold
Aimco has been named as a defendant in lawsuits that have alleged personal injury and property damage as a result of the presence of mold. In addition, we are aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements. We have only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure. We have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training, and include a detailed moisture intrusion and mold assessment during acquisition due diligence. We believe these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure from our properties and will minimize the effects that mold may have on our residents. To date, we have not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions. Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change, we can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
F-31
Table of Contents
FLSA Litigation
As previously disclosed, we and NHP Management Company (“NHPMN”), our subsidiary, were defendants in a lawsuit, filed as a collective action in August 2003 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for time worked in excess of 40 hours per week (“overtime claims”). The plaintiffs also contended that we and NHPMN failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be “on-call” (“on-call claims”). In March 2007, the court in the District of Columbia decertified the collective action. In July 2007, plaintiffs’ counsel filed individual cases in Federal court in 22 different jurisdictions. In 2008, we settled the overtime cases involving 652 plaintiffs and established a framework for resolving the 88 remaining “on-call” claims and the attorneys’ fees claimed by plaintiffs’ counsel. As a result, the lawsuits asserted in the 22 Federal courts will be dismissed. We believe any remaining contingencies associated with these matters are immaterial.
Operating Leases
We are obligated under office space and equipment non-cancelable operating leases. In addition, we sublease certain of our office space to tenants under non-cancelable subleases. Approximate minimum annual rentals under operating leases and approximate minimum payments to be received under annual subleases are as follows (in thousands):
Operating | ||||||||
Lease | Sublease | |||||||
Obligations | Receivables | |||||||
2009 | $ | 7,904 | $ | 597 | ||||
2010 | 6,812 | 597 | ||||||
2011 | 5,504 | — | ||||||
2012 | 5,028 | — | ||||||
2013 | 2,594 | — | ||||||
Thereafter | 4,093 | — | ||||||
Total | $ | 31,935 | $ | 1,194 | ||||
Substantially all of the office space subject to the operating leases described above are for the use of our corporate offices and area operations. Rent expense recognized totaled $10.2 million, $9.8 million, and $8.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Sublease receipts that offset rent expense totaled approximately $0.7 million, $1.3 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
As discussed in Note 3, during the three months ended December 31, 2008, we initiated a restructuring program pursuant to which we vacated certain leased office space for which we remain obligated. In connection with the restructuring, we accrued $6.4 million representing the estimated fair value of certain lease obligations included above related to space we are no longer using, reduced by estimated sublease amounts.
F-32
Table of Contents
NOTE 9 — Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities of the taxable REIT subsidiaries for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of our deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||
Partnership differences | $ | 47,635 | $ | 59,419 | ||||
Depreciation | 2,477 | 2,441 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 7,757 | 4,794 | ||||||
Other | 11 | 40 | ||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | $ | 57,880 | $ | 66,694 | ||||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
Net operating, capital and other loss carryforwards | $ | 7,183 | $ | 49,302 | ||||
Provision for impairments on real estate assets | 33,321 | — | ||||||
Receivables | 5,530 | 6,321 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities | 23,504 | 9,730 | ||||||
Accrued interest expense | 2,220 | 917 | ||||||
Intangibles — management contracts | 3,789 | 5,632 | ||||||
Tax credit carryforwards | 8,521 | 7,011 | ||||||
Equity compensation | 1,983 | 1,860 | ||||||
Other | 155 | 347 | ||||||
Total deferred tax assets | 86,206 | 81,120 | ||||||
Net deferred income tax assets | $ | 28,326 | $ | 14,426 | ||||
At December 31, 2006, we maintained a $1.9 million valuation allowance for deferred tax assets primarily related to previously unrecognized alternative minimum tax credits that were generated by predecessor entities. As a result of our implementation of FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, or FIN 48, on January 1, 2007, we reclassified the $1.9 million deferred tax asset as an unrecognized tax benefit and removed the corresponding valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2008, we determined a valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets was not necessary based on a determination that it was more likely than not that such assets will be realized prior to their expiration. This determination included the evaluation of prudent and feasible tax planning strategies that are available to us.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of our unrecognized tax benefits from January 1, 2007, the date on which we adopted FIN 48, is presented below:
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Balance at January 1 | $ | 2,965 | $ | 3,118 | ||||
Reductions as a result of the lapse of applicable statutes | — | (189 | ) | |||||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 115 | 36 | ||||||
Balance at December 31 | $ | 3,080 | $ | 2,965 | ||||
We do not anticipate any material changes in existing unrecognized tax benefits during the next 12 months. Because the statute of limitations has not yet elapsed, our Federal income tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2005, and subsequent years and certain of our State income tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2003, and subsequent years are currently subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service or other tax authorities. Our policy is to include interest and penalties related to income taxes in income taxes in our consolidated statements of income.
As a result of SFAS 123R, our deferred tax assets at December 31, 2008 and 2007 do not include $3.6 million and $4.2 million, respectively, of excess tax benefits from employee stock option exercises and vested restricted stock awards that are a component of our net operating loss carryforwards. Additional paid-in capital will be increased by $3.6 million if and when such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized.
F-33
Table of Contents
Significant components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows and are classified within income tax benefit in continuing operations and income from discontinued operations, net in our statements of income for 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Current: | ||||||||||||
Federal | $ | 8,678 | $ | 20 | $ | 5,380 | ||||||
State | 2,415 | 1,938 | 1,272 | |||||||||
Total current | 11,093 | 1,958 | 6,652 | |||||||||
Deferred: | ||||||||||||
Federal | (22,115 | ) | (17,816 | ) | 13,197 | |||||||
State | (2,386 | ) | (1,833 | ) | 1,698 | |||||||
Total deferred | (24,501 | ) | (19,649 | ) | 14,895 | |||||||
Total provision (benefit) | $ | (13,408 | ) | $ | (17,691 | ) | $ | 21,547 | ||||
Classification: | ||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | (53,371 | ) | $ | (19,840 | ) | $ | (11,095 | ) | |||
Discontinued operations | $ | 39,963 | $ | 2,149 | $ | 32,642 |
Consolidated income (loss) subject to tax, consisting of pretax income of our taxable REIT subsidiaries and gains on certain property sales that are subject to income tax under section 1374 of the Internal Revenue Code, is $(81.8) million for 2008, $(41.5) million for 2007, and $53.3 million for 2006. The reconciliation of income tax attributable to continuing and discontinued operations computed at the U.S. statutory rate to income tax expense (benefit) is shown below (dollars in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
Tax at U.S. statutory rates on consolidated income (loss) subject to tax | $ | (28,632 | ) | 35.0 | % | $ | (14,508 | ) | 35.0 | % | $ | 18,639 | 35.0 | % | ||||||||||
State income tax, net of Federal tax benefit | 29 | — | 106 | (0.3 | %) | 3,038 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Effect of permanent differences | 215 | (0.3 | %) | (306 | ) | 0.7 | % | (130 | ) | (0.2 | %) | |||||||||||||
Tax effect of intercompany transfers of assets between the REIT and taxable REIT subsidiaries(1) | 15,059 | (18.4 | %) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Write off of excess tax basis | (79 | ) | 0.1 | % | (2,983 | ) | 7.2 | % | — | — | ||||||||||||||
$ | (13,408 | ) | 16.4 | % | $ | (17,691 | ) | 42.6 | % | $ | 21,547 | 40.5 | % | |||||||||||
(1) | Includes the effect of assets contributed by us to taxable REIT subsidiaries, for which deferred tax expense or benefit was recognized upon the sale or impairment of the asset by the taxable REIT subsidiary. |
Income taxes paid totaled approximately $13.8 million, $3.0 million and $9.8 million in the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
At December 31, 2008, we had net operating loss carryforwards, or NOLs, of approximately $22.3 million for income tax purposes that expire in years 2023 to 2028. Subject to certain separate return limitations, we may use these NOLs to offset all or a portion of taxable income generated by our taxable REIT subsidiaries. We used approximately $104.5 million of NOLs during the year ended December 31, 2008, to offset gains from the sale of assets by our taxable subsidiaries. Additionally, our low-income housing and rehabilitation tax credit carryforwards as of December 31, 2008, were approximately $7.2 million for income tax purposes that expire in years 2012 to 2028. We had approximately $1.8 million of alternative minimum tax (AMT) credit carryforwards available at December 31, 2008, subsequent to the application of a FIN 48 uncertain tax position discussed above. These AMT credit carryforwards do not expire and can be used to offset future regular tax liabilities.
F-34
Table of Contents
NOTE 10 — Notes Receivable from Aimco
In exchange for the sale of certain real estate assets to Aimco in December 2000, we received notes receivable, which we refer to as the Notes, totaling $10.1 million. The Notes bear interest at the rate of 5.7% per annum. Of the $10.1 million total, $7.6 million is due upon demand, and the remainder is due in scheduled semi-annual payments with all unpaid principal and interest due on December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the balance of the Notes totaled $15.6 million and $14.8, respectively, which includes accrued and unpaid interest.
NOTE 11 — Partners’ Capital and Redeemable Preferred Units
Preferred OP Units
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had the following classes of preferred OP Units outstanding (stated at their redemption values):
Annual Distribution Rate | Balance | |||||||||||||||
Per Share | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
Redemption | (paid | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Date (1) | quarterly) | (thousands) | (thousands) | |||||||||||||
Perpetual: | ||||||||||||||||
Class G Partnership Preferred Units, $0.01 par value, 4,050,000 units authorized, 4,050,000 units issued and outstanding | 07/15/2008 | 9.3750 | % | $ | 101,000 | $ | 101,000 | |||||||||
Class T Partnership Preferred Units, $0.01 par value, 6,000,000 units authorized, 6,000,000 units issued and outstanding | 07/31/2008 | 8.000 | % | 150,000 | 150,000 | |||||||||||
Class U Partnership Preferred Units, $0.01 par value, 8,000,000 units authorized, 8,000,000 units issued and outstanding | 03/24/2009 | 7.750 | % | 200,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||||
Class V Partnership Preferred Units, $0.01 par value, 3,450,000 units authorized, 3,450,000 units issued and outstanding | 09/29/2009 | 8.000 | % | 86,250 | 86,250 | |||||||||||
Class Y Partnership Preferred Units, $0.01 par value, 3,450,000 units authorized, 3,450,000 units issued and outstanding | 12/21/2009 | 7.875 | % | 86,250 | 86,250 | |||||||||||
Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Partnership Preferred Units, $0.01 par value per unit, 240 units authorized, 146 and 200 units issued and outstanding (2) | 06/30/2011 | (2 | ) | 73,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 696,500 | $ | 723,500 | ||||||||||||
(1) | All classes of preferred units are redeemable by the Partnership only in connection with a concurrent redemption by Aimco of the corresponding preferred Aimco equity held by unrelated parties. | |
(2) | On June 29, 2006, Aimco sold 200 shares of its Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, or the CRA Preferred Stock, with a liquidation preference of $500,000 per share, for net proceeds of $97.5 million. The Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Partnership Preferred Units, or the CRA Preferred Units, have substantially the same terms as the CRA Preferred Stock. Holders of the CRA Preferred Units are entitled to cumulative cash dividends payable quarterly in arrears on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 of each year, when and as declared, beginning on September 30, 2006. For the period from June 29, 2006, the date of original issuance, through March 31, 2015, the dividend rate is a variable rate per annum equal to the Three-Month LIBOR Rate (as defined in the articles supplementary designating the CRA Preferred Stock) plus 1.25%, calculated as of the beginning of each quarterly dividend period. The rate at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was 5.01% and 6.38%, respectively. Upon liquidation, holders of the CRA Preferred Units are entitled to a preference of $500,000 per share, plus an amount equal to accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends, whether or not earned or declared. The CRA Preferred Units rank prior to our common OP Units and on the same level as our other preferred units, with respect to the payment of dividends and the distribution of amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. The CRA Preferred Units are not redeemable prior to June 30, 2011, except in limited circumstances related to Aimco’s REIT qualification. On and after June 30, 2011, the CRA Preferred Units are redeemable for cash, in whole or from time to time in part, upon the redemption, at Aimco’s option, of its CRA Preferred Stock at a price per share equal to the liquidation preference, plus accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, to the redemption date. |
During 2008, Aimco repurchased 54 shares, or $27.0 million in liquidation preference, of its CRA Preferred Stock for cash totaling $24.8 million. Concurrent with this redemption, we repurchased from Aimco an equivalent number of outstanding CRA Preferred Units. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Topic D-42,The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings Per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock, or EITF Topic D-42, the $2.2 million excess of the carrying value over the redemption price, offset by $0.7 million of issuance costs previously recorded as a reduction of partners capital, is reflected as a reduction of net income attributable to preferred unitholders for purposes of calculating earnings per unit for the year ended December 31, 2008.
F-35
Table of Contents
During 2007, Aimco redeemed all 1,904,762 million shares outstanding of its convertible 8.1% Class W Preferred Stock for a total redemption price of $54.61 per share, which included a redemption price per share of $53.55 (which was 102% of the $52.50 per share liquidation preference) plus approximately $1.06 per share in respect of accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends through September 30, 2007. Concurrent with this redemption we redeemed the outstanding Class W Partnership Preferred Units. In accordance with EITF Topic D-42, the $2.0 million excess of the redemption price over the carrying value (the 2% redemption premium) and $0.6 million of issuance costs previously recorded as a reduction of partners capital are reflected as an increase to net income attributable to preferred unitholders for purposes of calculating earnings per unit for the year ended December 31, 2007.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, Aimco redeemed for cash all 2.53 million shares outstanding of the 10.1% Class Q Cumulative Preferred Stock and all 6.94 million shares outstanding of the 10% Class R Cumulative Preferred Stock. Concurrent with these redemptions we redeemed the outstanding Class Q and Class R Cumulative Preferred Units, which resulted in $2.5 million and $4.3 million, respectively, of related preferred unit issuance costs being deducted in determining 2006 net income attributable to common unitholders. During the year ended December 31, 2006, Aimco also redeemed for cash all 2.0 million shares outstanding of the 8.5% Class X Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. Concurrent with this redemption, we redeemed all the outstanding Class X Cumulative Convertible Preferred Units, which resulted in $0.1 million of related preferred unit issuance costs being deducted in determining 2006 net income attributable to common unitholders.
All classes of preferred OP Units are pari passu with each other and are senior to the common OP Units. None of the classes of preferred OP Units have any voting rights, except the right to approve certain changes to the Partnership Agreement that would adversely affect holders of such class of units. Distributions on all preferred OP Units are subject to being declared by the General Partner. All of the above outstanding classes of preferred units have a liquidation preference per unit of $25, with the exception of the CRA Preferred Units, which have a liquidation preference per unit of $500,000.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the following classes of preferred OP Units (stated at their redemption values) owned by third parties were outstanding (in thousands, except unit data):
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Class One Partnership Preferred Units, 90,000 units issued and outstanding, redeemable at the holders option one year following issuance, holder to receive distributions at 8.0% ($8.00 per annum per unit) | $ | 9,000 | $ | 9,000 | ||||
Class Two Partnership Preferred Units, 44,050 and 45,993 units issued and outstanding, redeemable at the holders option one year following issuance, holders to receive distributions at 5.9% ($1.48 per annum per unit) | 1,102 | 1,150 | ||||||
Class Three Partnership Preferred Units, 1,419,316 and 1,455,751 units issued and outstanding, redeemable at the holders option one year following issuance, holders to receive distributions at 7.88% ($1.97 per annum per unit) | 35,483 | 36,394 | ||||||
Class Four Partnership Preferred Units, 755,999 units issued and outstanding, redeemable at the holders option one year following issuance, holders to receive distributions at 8.0% ($2.00 per annum per unit) | 18,900 | 18,900 | ||||||
Class Five Partnership Preferred Units, 68,671 units issued and outstanding, redeemable for cash at any time at our option, holder to receive distributions equal to the per unit distribution on the common OP Units (1) | 2,747 | 2,747 | ||||||
Class Six Partnership Preferred Units, 802,453 units issued and outstanding, redeemable at the holders option one year following issuance, holder to receive distributions at 8.5% ($2.125 per annum per unit) | 20,061 | 20,061 | ||||||
Class Seven Partnership Preferred Units, 27,960 units issued and outstanding, redeemable at the holders option one year following issuance, holder to receive distributions at 9.5% ($2.375 per annum per unit) | 699 | 699 | ||||||
Class Eight Partnership Preferred Units, 6,250 units issued and outstanding, redeemable for cash at any time at our option, holder to receive distributions equal to the per unit distribution on the common OP Units (1) | 156 | 156 | ||||||
Subtotal | $ | 88,148 | $ | 89,107 | ||||
Amounts reclassified to temporary capital (2) | (85,245 | ) | — | |||||
Total | $ | 2,903 | $ | 89,107 | ||||
(1) | Holders of the Class Five and Class Eight Partnership Preferred Units received the per unit special distributions discussed in Note 1 in addition to the regular distributions received by common OP unitholders during 2008 and 2007. |
(2) | The Class One, Class Two, Class Three, Class Four, Class Six and Class Seven preferred OP Units are redeemable, at the holders’ option, one year following issuance. We, at our sole discretion, may settle such redemption requests in cash or common OP Units equal to the number of Aimco’s Class A Common Stock in a value equal to the redemption preference. During December 2008, we implemented a policy that establishes criteria for determining when requested redemptions of these preferred OP Units will be settled in cash or common OP Units, and based on the criteria under this policy, as of December 31, 2008, redemption requests were to be settled in cash. Based on the requirements under this policy for cash settlement of potential redemption requests for these preferred OP Units, at December 31, 2008, we reclassified the redemption amounts for these preferred OP Units into redeemable preferred units within temporary capital in our consolidated balance sheet. |
F-36
Table of Contents
For any preferred OP Units that are redeemed for Aimco Class A Common Stock, upon redemption, we will issue a common OP Unit to Aimco for each share of Aimco Class A Common Stock issued. In addition, subject to certain conditions, the Class Four, Class Five, Class Six and Class Eight Partnership Preferred Units are convertible into common OP Units.
During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were approximately 38,400 and 2,200 preferred OP Units tendered for redemption in exchange for cash, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2008, no preferred OP Units were tendered for redemption in exchange for shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock and during the year ended December 31, 2007, approximately 1,800 preferred OP Units were tendered for redemption in exchange for approximately 1,300 shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. During 2008, we implemented a policy that establishes criteria for determining when requested redemptions of preferred OP Units will be settled in cash or shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock, and based on the criteria under this policy, as of December 31, 2008, redemption requests were to be settled in cash.
The distributions paid on each class of preferred OP Units classified as partners’ capital in the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and, in the case of the redeemable preferred units discussed above, classified in temporary capital as of December 31, 2008, are as follows (in thousands, except per unit data):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Total | Amount | Total | Amount | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Class of Preferred | Per | Amount | Per | Amount | Per | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||
Units | Unit (1) | Paid | Unit (1) | Paid | Unit (1) | Paid | ||||||||||||||||||
Class G | $ | 2.34 | $ | 9,492 | $ | 2.34 | $ | 9,492 | $ | 2.34 | $ | 9,492 | ||||||||||||
Class Q | — | — | — | — | 0.67 | (2) | 1,686 | |||||||||||||||||
Class R | — | — | — | — | 1.49 | (2) | 10,361 | |||||||||||||||||
Class T | 2.00 | 12,000 | 2.00 | 12,000 | 2.00 | 12,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class U | 1.94 | 15,500 | 1.94 | 15,500 | 1.94 | 15,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class V | 2.00 | 6,900 | 2.00 | 6,900 | 2.00 | 6,900 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class W | — | — | 4.25 | (3) | 8,100 | 4.25 | 8,100 | |||||||||||||||||
Class X | — | — | — | — | 1.06 | (2) | 2,125 | |||||||||||||||||
Class Y | 1.97 | 6,792 | 1.97 | 6,792 | 1.97 | 6,792 | ||||||||||||||||||
Series A CRA | 24,381 | (4) | 4,531 | 41,661 | 8,316 | 8,720 | (5) | 1,744 | ||||||||||||||||
Class One | 8.00 | 720 | 8.00 | 720 | 8.00 | 720 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class Two | 1.52 | 67 | 1.48 | 68 | 1.52 | 71 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class Three | 2.01 | 2,856 | 1.97 | 2,869 | 1.98 | 2,888 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class Four | 2.00 | 1,512 | 2.00 | 1,512 | 2.00 | 1,512 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class Five | 7.91 | 543 | 2.40 | 165 | 2.40 | 165 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class Six | 2.12 | 1,705 | 2.13 | 1,705 | 2.13 | 1,705 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class Seven | 2.36 | 66 | 2.38 | 67 | 2.45 | 69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class Eight | 7.91 | 49 | 2.40 | 15 | 2.40 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class Thirteen | — | — | — | — | 0.66 | (6) | 2,242 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 62,733 | $ | 74,221 | $ | 84,087 | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Amounts per unit are calculated based on the number of preferred units outstanding either at the end of each year or as of conversion or redemption date, as noted. | |
(2) | For the period from January 1, 2006, to the date of redemption. | |
(3) | For the period from January 1, 2007, to the date of redemption. | |
(4) | Amount per unit is based on 146 units outstanding for the entire period. 54 units were repurchased in September 2008 and received $17,980 in dividends through the date of purchase. | |
(5) | For the period from June 29, 2006, (date of issuance) to December 31, 2006. | |
(6) | For the period from January 1, 2006 to June 29, 2006, the date of conversion to CRA Preferred Units. |
F-37
Table of Contents
Common OP Units
Common OP Units are redeemable by common OP Unitholders (other than the General Partner and Special Limited Partner) at their option, subject to certain restrictions, on the basis of one common OP Unit for either one share of Aimco Class A Common Stock or cash equal to the fair value of a share of Aimco Class A Common Stock at the time of redemption. We have the option to deliver shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock in exchange for all or any portion of the cash requested. When a Limited Partner redeems a common OP Unit for Aimco Class A Common Stock, Limited Partners’ Capital is reduced and Special Limited Partners’ capital is increased. Common OP Units held by Aimco are not redeemable.
In December 2007, July 2008, October 2008, and December 2008, in connection with our special distributions discussed in Note 1, Aimco’s board of directors declared corresponding special dividends payable on January 30, 2008, August 29, 2008, December 1, 2008, and January 29, 2009, respectively, to holders of record of Aimco Class A Common Stock on December 31, 2007, July 28, 2008, October 27, 2008, and December 29, 2008, respectively. A portion of the special dividends in the amounts of $0.60 per share represents payment of the regular dividend for the quarters ended December 31, 2007, June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2008, respectively, and the remaining amount per share represents an additional dividend associated with taxable gains from property dispositions. Portions of the special dividends were paid through the issuance of shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. See Note 1 for further discussion of these special distributions.
During 2008 and 2007, Aimco issued approximately 24,000 shares and 87,000 shares, respectively, of Aimco Class A Common Stock to certain of its non-executive officers who purchased the shares at market prices. In exchange for the shares purchased, the officers executed notes payable totaling $0.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively. These notes, which are 25% recourse to the borrowers, have a 10-year maturity and bear interest either at a fixed rate of 6% annually or a floating rate based on the 30-day LIBOR plus 3.85%, which is subject to an annual interest rate cap of typically 7.25%. The notes were contributed by Aimco to us in exchange for an equivalent number of common OP Units, respectively. Total payments in 2008 and 2007 on all such notes were $1.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively. In 2008 and 2007, Aimco reacquired approximately 31,000 and 9,000 shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock from officers in exchange for the cancellation of related notes totaling $1.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Concurrently, we reacquired from Aimco an equal number of common OP Units.
In addition, in 2008 and 2007, we issued to Aimco approximately 316,000 and 455,000 common OP Units to Aimco and Aimco issued an equal number of restricted shares to certain officers and employees. The restricted stock was recorded at the fair market value of Aimco Class A Common Stock on the date of issuance. These restricted shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of and are subject to a risk of forfeiture prior to the expiration of the applicable vesting period (typically ratably over a period of four years). Certain shares of restricted stock issued during 2006 and 2005 are subject to accelerated vesting upon the achievement of a specified calendar year performance measure target.
In 2008, 2007 and 2006, Aimco purchased in the open market approximately 13.9 million, 7.5 million and 2.3 million shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock, respectively, at an average price per share of approximately $34.02, $43.70 and $52.27, respectively. After considering the effect of shares issued pursuant to Aimco’s special dividends, the effective number of shares repurchased totaled 19.3 million, 10.9 million and 3.4 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, at an effective average price per share of $24.48, $29.77 and $35.41, respectively. Concurrent with Aimco’s repurchases of Aimco Class A Common Stock in 2008 and 2007, we repurchased from Aimco a corresponding number of common OP Units at prices per unit equal to the prices per share paid by Aimco to repurchase such shares.
In 2007, we completed tender offers for limited partnership interests resulting in the issuance of approximately 55,400 common OP Units. Approximately 55,100 of the common OP Units issued in 2007 were to unrelated limited partners in VMS in connection with our purchase of seven properties from the partnership, as discussed in Note 3. In 2008, we did not issue a significant number of common OP Units in connection with tender offers for limited partners.
During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, approximately 50,000 and 39,000 common OP Units, respectively, were redeemed in exchange for cash, and approximately 114,000 and 470,000 common OP Units, respectively, were redeemed in exchange for shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock.
F-38
Table of Contents
High Performance Units
From 1998 through 2005, we issued various classes of High Performance Units, or HPUs, as follows: 1998 — Class I HPUs; 2001 — Class II HPUs, Class III HPUs and Class IV HPUs; 2002 - Class V HPUs; 2003 — Class VI HPUs; 2004 — Class VII HPUs; 2005 — Class VIII HPUs; and 2006 — Class IX HPUs. These HPUs were issued to limited liability companies owned by certain members of our senior management (and Aimco’s independent directors in the case of Class I HPUs only) in exchange for cash in amounts that we determined, with the assistance of a nationally recognized independent valuation expert, to be the fair value of the HPUs. The terms of the HPUs provide for the issuance, following a measurement period of generally three years (one year in the case of Class II HPUs and two years in the case of Class III HPUs), of an increased number of HPUs depending on the degree, if any, to which certain financial performance benchmarks are achieved over the applicable measurement period. The holders of HPUs at the conclusion of the measurement period receive the same amount of distributions that are paid to holders of an equivalent number of our outstanding common OP Units. Prior to the end of the measurement period, the limited liability company holders of HPUs receive only nominal distributions. If the specified minimum benchmarks are not achieved at the conclusion of the applicable measurement period, the HPUs have only nominal value and may be reacquired by us for a nominal amount.
The following table sets forth information for HPUs outstanding as of December 31, 2008:
Gross | End of | |||||||||||||||
Year of | Proceeds | Measurement | Outstanding Units at | |||||||||||||
Class of HPUs | Issuance | (thousands) | Period | December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Class I | 1998 | $ | 2,070 | 12/31/2000 | 2,344,719 |
The minimum performance benchmarks were not achieved for HPU Classes II through IX. Accordingly, those HPUs had only nominal value at the conclusion of the related measurement period and were reacquired by us and cancelled.
In determining the value of the historical HPUs, we used a discounted cash flow valuation methodology supported by a nationally recognized independent valuation expert. This discounted cash flow methodology used a 24% discount rate applied to probability-adjusted cash flows reflecting possible distribution outcomes. Using that methodology, we determined the fair value of HPUs as follows: Class V HPUs $1,066,000, Class VI HPUs $985,000, Class VII HPUs $915,000, Class VIII HPUs $780,000 and Class IX HPUs $875,000. We have evaluated an alternative methodology that (1) assumes an investor receives shares of Aimco common stock in the event that the performance hurdles are met at the end of the measurement period, (2) uses a discount rate for the three year measurement period of approximately 30%, and (3) applies a liquidity discount of 25% to reflect that the HPUs are illiquid securities absent a change of control of Aimco. Applying this alternative methodology results in an effectively lower net discount rate than the rate used in the discounted cash flow methodology and, as a result, the value of those HPUs would have been as follows: Class V HPUs $1,696,000, Class VI HPUs $1,496,000, Class VII HPUs $1,867,000, Class VIII HPUs $1,772,000 and Class IX HPUs $2,042,000. Using the alternative methodology resulted in a higher valuation than the discounted cash flow methodology based on the use of assumed common stock prices in conjunction with the discount rate and liquidity discount discussed above. Accordingly, after taking into account the percentage of each program subscribed and the unamortized portion of the Class VIII and Class IX HPUs, we recorded a cumulative adjustment of $2.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2006, to reflect the difference between these two methodologies. The $2.9 million correction is also due to a change in the assumptions of the discount rates used to value Class V HPUs through Class IX HPUs.
Investment in Aimco
In 1998, Aimco issued 1.0 million shares of Class J Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, which we refer to as Class J Preferred Stock, for proceeds of $100.0 million. The proceeds were contributed by Aimco to us in exchange for 1.0 million Class J Partnership Preferred Units, which we refer to as Class J Preferred Units. Concurrently, we issued 250,000 Class J Preferred Units valued at $25.0 million to Aimco, in exchange for 250,000 shares of Class J Preferred Stock. In June 2000, we converted 250,000 shares of Aimco Class J Preferred Stock, with a liquidation value of $25.0 million, into 625,000 shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. In connection with this conversion, 41,991 shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock, valued at $1.5 million, were exchanged by us for common OP Units held by a limited partner. In 2001, 198,269 shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock, valued at $7.1 million, were exchanged by us for common OP Units held by a limited partner. The investment in Aimco Class A Common Stock is presented in the accompanying financial statements as a reduction to partners’ capital.
Registration Statements
In April 2008, we and Aimco filed a new shelf registration statement to replace the existing shelf (which was due to expire later in 2008) that provides for the issuance of debt securities by us and debt and equity securities by the Aimco.
F-39
Table of Contents
NOTE 12 — Share-Based Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans
Stock Award and Incentive Plan
Aimco, from time to time, issues restricted stock and stock options to its employees. We are required to issue common OP Units to Aimco for the same number of shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock that are issued to employees under these arrangements. Upon exercise of the stock options, Aimco must contribute to us the proceeds received in connection with the exercised options. Therefore, the following disclosures pertain to Aimco’s stock options. Our obligations to issue common OP Units under Aimco’s share based compensation plans results in reciprocal accounting treatment in our financial statements.
Aimco’s board of directors adopted the Apartment Investment and Management Company 1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, or the 1997 Plan, to attract and retain officers, key employees and independent directors. The 1997 Plan reserved for issuance a maximum of 20 million shares, which may be in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock, or other types of awards as authorized under the 1997 Plan. The 1997 Plan expired on April 24, 2007. On April 30, 2007, the 2007 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, or the 2007 Plan, was approved as successor to the 1997 Plan. The 2007 Plan reserves for issuance a maximum of three million shares, which may be in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock, or other types of awards as authorized under the 2007 Plan. Pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of the 2007 Plan, the number of shares reserved for issuance has been adjusted to reflect Aimco’s special dividends discussed in Note 1. At December 31, 2008, there were approximately 1.7 million shares available to be granted under the 2007 Plan. The 2007 Plan is administered by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of Aimco’s board of directors. In the case of stock options, the exercise price of the options granted may not be less than the fair market value of Aimco Class A Common Stock at the date of grant. The term of the options is generally ten years from the date of grant. The options typically vest over a period of one to five years from the date of grant. Aimco generally issues new shares upon exercise of options. Restricted stock awards typically vest over a period of three to five years.
For stock options granted prior to January 1, 2003, we applied Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, or APB 25, and related interpretations. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of Aimco’s employee stock options equaled the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense related to such options was recognized. From January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2005, we applied the accounting provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,or SFAS 123, as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123,or SFAS 148, to all employee awards granted, modified, or settled on or after January 1, 2003, which resulted in recognition of compensation expense related to Aimco’s stock options based on the fair value of the stock options. We recognized compensation expense for stock options accounted for under SFAS 123 and restricted stock awards ratably over the period the awards vested. Compensation cost was reversed as forfeitures occurred.
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS 123R, which superseded SFAS 123. SFAS 123R requires all share-based employee compensation, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on fair value and provides for a modified prospective application method of adoption. Under this method, we are applying the provisions of SFAS 123R prospectively to new awards granted on or after January 1, 2006, and to existing awards that are modified after January 1, 2006, and are recognizing compensation cost over the remaining vesting period for the unvested portion of all outstanding awards granted prior to 2006. The measurement and recognition provisions of SFAS 123R that we apply to Aimco’s stock compensation arrangements are similar to those that we applied under SFAS 123 to awards granted on or after January 1, 2003. Under SFAS 123R, we continue to recognize the cost of stock-based compensation ratably over the vesting period. The primary change in our method of recognizing compensation cost relates to the treatment of forfeitures. Under SFAS 123R, expected forfeitures are required to be estimated in determining periodic compensation cost, whereas under SFAS 123 we recognized forfeitures as they occurred.
In connection with the adoption of SFAS 123R as of January 1, 2006, we estimated that forfeitures of unvested awards of stock options and restricted stock for which compensation expense was recognized prior to 2006 will total approximately $154,000. SFAS 123R provides that a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle be recognized for such estimated forfeitures as of the date of adoption. We believe the estimated forfeitures upon adoption of SFAS 123R are immaterial and have reported the cumulative effect adjustment in our general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 123R resulted in decreases of $1.2 million in 2006 income from continuing operations and net income and decreases of $0.01 in 2006 basic and diluted earnings per unit. The adoption of SFAS 123R did not have a material effect on 2006 cash flows from operating or financing activities. After 2006, SFAS 123R is not expected to have any significant effect on our financial statements other than the timing of recognition of forfeitures.
F-40
Table of Contents
We estimated the fair value of our options using a Black-Scholes closed-form valuation model using the assumptions set forth in the table below. For options granted in 2008, the expected term of the options was based on historical option exercises and post-vesting terminations. For options granted in 2007 and 2006, the expected term of the options reflects the average of the vesting period and the contractual term for the options, with the exception of a grant of approximately 0.6 million options to an executive during 2007, for which the expected term used was equal to the vesting period of five years. Expected volatility reflects the historical volatility of Aimco Class A Common Stock during the historical period commensurate with the expected term of the options that ended on the date of grant. The expected dividend yield reflects the actual cash dividend amount per share paid on Aimco Class A Common Stock after 2003 and the risk-free interest rate reflects the annualized yield of a zero coupon U.S. Treasury security with a term equal to the expected term of the option. The weighted average fair value of options and our valuation assumptions for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Weighted average grant-date fair value(1) | $ | 3.37 | $ | 4.63 | $ | 3.85 | ||||||
Assumptions: | ||||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 3.12 | % | 4.70 | % | 4.58 | % | ||||||
Expected dividend yield(1) | 4.67 | % | 3.64 | % | 4.11 | % | ||||||
Expected volatility | 24.02 | % | 21.66 | % | 20.15 | % | ||||||
Weighted average expected life of options | 6.5 years | 5.6 years | 6.5 years |
(1) | The weighted average grant-date fair value (per share) and expected dividend yield for each period presented has been retroactively adjusted for the effect of Aimco’s special dividends discussed in Note 1. The weighted average grant-date fair values (per share) for options granted during 2008, 2007 and 2006, were $4.34, $6.28 and $5.23, respectively, before the effect of retroactive adjustments for the special dividends. |
The following table summarizes activity for Aimco’s outstanding stock options for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (numbers of options in thousands):
2008(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Average | Number | Average | Number | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
of | Exercise | of | Exercise | of | Exercise | |||||||||||||||||||
Options | Price | Options | Price | Options | Price | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year | 11,033 | $ | 30.68 | 11,676 | $ | 28.98 | 15,011 | $ | 28.56 | |||||||||||||||
Granted (2) | 1,264 | 30.84 | 1,297 | 42.17 | 940 | 31.78 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised | (19 | ) | 29.13 | (1,900 | ) | 28.19 | (3,825 | ) | 28.01 | |||||||||||||||
Forfeited | (1,900 | ) | 29.01 | (40 | ) | 27.85 | (450 | ) | 28.05 | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding at end of year | 10,378 | $ | 31.01 | 11,033 | $ | 30.68 | 11,676 | $ | 28.98 | |||||||||||||||
Exercisable at end of year | 7,206 | $ | 29.51 | 8,276 | $ | 29.27 | 8,838 | $ | 29.13 |
(1) | In connection with Aimco’s special dividends discussed in Note 1, the number of options and exercise prices of all outstanding awards were adjusted pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of the applicable plans based on the market price of Aimco’s stock on the ex-dividend dates of the related special dividends. The number of options and exercise prices in the table above have been retroactively adjusted using these factors, which may differ from the effective adjustments in outstanding shares for each of Aimco’s special dividends discussed in Note 1. The adjustment of the awards pursuant to Aimco’s special dividends is considered a modification under SFAS 123R, but did not result in a change in the fair value of any awards. | |
(2) | Options granted during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled 980, 956 and 692 (in thousands), respectively, before the effect of retroactive adjustments for the special dividends discussed above. |
The intrinsic value of a stock option represents the amount by which the current price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. Options outstanding at December 31, 2008, had no aggregate intrinsic value and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 5.7 years. Options exercisable at December 31, 2007, had no aggregate intrinsic value and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 4.0 years. The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2008 was less than $0.1 million, and was $28.9 million and $34.9 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively. We may realize tax benefits in connection with the exercise of options by employees of Aimco’s taxable subsidiaries. We realized tax benefits of less than $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
F-41
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes activity for Aimco’s restricted stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (numbers of shares in thousands):
2008(1) | 2007(1) | 2006(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Average | Number | Grant- | Number | Grant- | |||||||||||||||||||
of | Grant-Date | of | Date | of | Date | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | Shares | Fair Value | Shares | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Unvested at beginning of year | 1,394 | $ | 31.73 | 1,580 | $ | 27.62 | 1,281 | $ | 24.15 | |||||||||||||||
Granted (2) | 315 | 28.44 | 447 | 41.43 | 882 | 30.60 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vested | (519 | ) | 31.58 | (562 | ) | 27.76 | (349 | ) | 24.62 | |||||||||||||||
Forfeited | (164 | ) | 36.38 | (71 | ) | 32.73 | (234 | ) | 24.36 | |||||||||||||||
Unvested at end of year | 1,026 | $ | 30.07 | 1,394 | $ | 31.73 | 1,580 | $ | 27.62 | |||||||||||||||
(1) | In connection with Aimco’s special dividends discussed in Note 1, holders of restricted shares received cash, additional shares of restricted stock, or a combination of cash and shares of restricted stock. The number shares and weighted average grant-date fair values (per share) for the periods presented above have been retroactively adjusted for the effect shares received by the holders of the restricted shares in connection with Aimco’s special dividends. | |
(2) | Restricted shares granted during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled 220, 308 and 607 (in thousands), respectively, before the effect of retroactive adjustments for Aimco’s special dividends discussed above. |
The aggregate fair value of shares that vested during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $16.5 million, $19.5 million and $12.1 million, respectively.
Total compensation cost recognized for restricted stock and stock option awards was $17.6 million, $19.2 million and $15.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Of these amounts, $3.8 million $4.3 million and $3.6 million, respectively, were capitalized. At December 31, 2008, total unvested compensation cost not yet recognized was $27.1 million. We expect to recognize this compensation over a weighted average period of approximately 1.7 years. Certain awards of restricted stock granted in 2006 and 2005 are subject to immediate vesting based on achievement of a specified annual financial performance target during the scheduled vesting period. Recognition of related compensation cost may be accelerated based on our ongoing assessment of whether the performance target is probable of being achieved. At this time, we do not believe that achievement of the performance target is probable.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Under the terms of Aimco’s employee stock purchase plan, eligible employees may authorize payroll deductions up to 15% of their base compensation to purchase shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock at a five percent discount from its fair value on the last day of the calendar quarter during which payroll deductions are made. In 2008, 2007 and 2006, 8,926, 3,751 and 648 shares were purchased under this plan at an average price of $23.86, $44.67 and $55.84, respectively or 11,340, 5,536 and 956 shares at an average price of $18.78, $30.27 and $37.85, respectively, after adjustments for the shares issued pursuant to the special dividends discussed in Note 1. No compensation cost is recognized in connection with this plan.
401(k) Plan
We provide a 401(k) defined-contribution employee savings plan. Employees who have completed 30 days of service and are age 18 or older are eligible to participate. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, our matching contributions were made in the following manner: (1) a 100% match on the first 3% of the participant’s compensation; and (2) a 50% match on the next 2% of the participant’s compensation. We incurred costs in connection with this plan of approximately $5.2 million, $5.2 million and $4.5 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. On December 31, 2008, we suspended employer matching contributions effective January 29, 2009. We may reinstate employer matching contributions at any time.
NOTE 13 — Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale
In accordance with SFAS 144 we report as discontinued operations real estate assets that meet the definition of a component of an entity and have been sold or meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale under SFAS 144. We include all results of these discontinued operations, less applicable income taxes, in a separate component of income on the consolidated statements of income under the heading “income from discontinued operations, net.” This treatment resulted in certain reclassifications of 2007 and 2006 financial statement amounts.
F-42
Table of Contents
We are currently marketing for sale certain real estate properties that are inconsistent with our long-term investment strategy. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate whether such properties meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale, including whether such properties are expected to be sold within twelve months. Additionally, certain properties that do not meet all of the criteria to be classified as held for sale at the balance sheet date may nevertheless be sold and included in discontinued operations in the subsequent twelve months; thus the number of properties that may be sold during the subsequent twelve months could exceed the number classified as held for sale. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had seven and 158 properties, with an aggregate of 1,668 and 38,870 units, classified as held for sale, respectively. Amounts classified as held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Real estate, net | $ | 65,576 | $ | 1,485,442 | ||||
Other assets | 1,584 | 19,844 | ||||||
Assets held for sale | $ | 67,160 | $ | 1,505,286 | ||||
Property debt | $ | 52,010 | $ | 1,140,427 | ||||
Other liabilities | 4,331 | 10,771 | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale | $ | 56,341 | $ | 1,151,198 | ||||
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we sold 151 properties with an aggregate of 37,202 units. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we sold 73 consolidated properties with an aggregate of 11,588 units. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we sold 77 consolidated properties with an aggregate of 17,307 units. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, discontinued operations includes the results of operations for the periods prior to the date of sale for all properties sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2008.
The following is a summary of the components of income from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Rental and other property revenues | $ | 250,277 | $ | 396,822 | $ | 492,275 | ||||||
Property operating expenses | (128,661 | ) | (201,233 | ) | (245,983 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (57,288 | ) | (96,554 | ) | (129,994 | ) | ||||||
Other expenses, net | (10,610 | ) | (5,966 | ) | (11,228 | ) | ||||||
Operating income | 53,718 | 93,069 | 105,070 | |||||||||
Interest income | 1,249 | 2,645 | 3,996 | |||||||||
Interest expense | (45,463 | ) | (76,648 | ) | (98,301 | ) | ||||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt | — | 22,852 | — | |||||||||
Minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships | 543 | (2,232 | ) | 3,136 | ||||||||
Income before gain on dispositions of real estate, impairment losses, deficit distributions to minority partners and income tax | 10,047 | 39,686 | 13,901 | |||||||||
Gain on dispositions of real estate, net of minority partners’ interest | 618,168 | 65,076 | 258,970 | |||||||||
Real estate impairment (losses) recoveries, net | (24,021 | ) | (4,873 | ) | 434 | |||||||
Recovery of deficit distributions (deficit distributions) to minority partners | 30,127 | (6,161 | ) | 10,441 | ||||||||
Income tax | (39,963 | ) | (2,149 | ) | (32,642 | ) | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net | $ | 594,358 | $ | 91,579 | $ | 251,104 | ||||||
Gain on dispositions of real estate is reported net of incremental direct costs incurred in connection with the transaction, including any prepayment penalties incurred upon repayment of mortgage loans collateralized by the property being sold. Such prepayment penalties totaled $64.9 million, $12.6 million and $53.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we recorded impairment losses totaling $24.0 million and $4.9 million on assets held for sale. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded a net recovery of impairment losses totaling $0.4 million on assets held for sale. We classify interest expense related to property debt within discontinued operations when the related real estate asset is sold or classified as held for sale.
F-43
Table of Contents
NOTE 14 — Earnings per Unit
We calculate earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of common OP Units, common OP Unit equivalents and dilutive convertible securities outstanding during the period. We consider both common OP Units and Class I HPUs, which have identical rights to distributions and undistributed earnings, to be common units for purposes of the earnings per unit data presented below. The following table illustrates the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands, except per unit data):
2008 | �� | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||
Numerator: | ||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations | $ | (118,863 | ) | $ | (57,462 | ) | $ | (54,040 | ) | |||
Less net income attributable to preferred unitholders | (61,354 | ) | (73,144 | ) | (90,527 | ) | ||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per unit — Loss from continuing operations (net of income attributable to preferred unitholders) | $ | (180,217 | ) | $ | (130,606 | ) | $ | (144,567 | ) | |||
Income from discontinued operations | $ | 594,358 | $ | 91,579 | $ | 251,104 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 475,495 | $ | 34,117 | $ | 197,064 | ||||||
Less net income attributable to preferred unitholders | (61,354 | ) | (73,144 | ) | (90,527 | ) | ||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per unit — Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | $ | 414,141 | $ | (39,027 | ) | $ | 106,537 | |||||
Denominator: | ||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per unit — weighted average number of common units outstanding: | ||||||||||||
Common OP Units | 128,404 | 147,504 | 148,906 | |||||||||
Class I HPUs | 2,368 | 2,379 | 2,379 | |||||||||
Total common units | 130,772 | 149,883 | 151,285 | |||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||
Dilutive potential common units | — | — | — | |||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per unit | 130,772 | 149,883 | 151,285 | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common unit—basic and diluted: | ||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations (net of income attributable to preferred unitholders) | $ | (1.38 | ) | $ | (0.87 | ) | $ | (0.96 | ) | |||
Income from discontinued operations | 4.55 | 0.61 | 1.66 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | $ | 3.17 | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.70 | |||||
Weighted average common OP Units outstanding, dilutive potential common units and earnings (loss) per common unit for each of the periods presented have been retroactively adjusted for the effect of the special distributions discussed in Note 1.
Prior to their redemption on September 30, 2007, the Class W Preferred Units that were convertible into common OP Units (see Note 11) were anti-dilutive on an “if converted” basis. Therefore, we deducted all of the distributions payable on the convertible preferred OP Units to arrive at the numerator and no additional units are included in the denominator when calculating basic and diluted earnings per common unit. As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the common unit equivalents that could potentially dilute basic earnings per unit in future periods totaled 11.5 million, 12.8 million and 13.6 million, respectively. These securities, including stock options, restricted stock awards and officer loan shares, have been excluded from the earnings per unit computations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
We consider the High Performance Units for which the applicable measurement period has not ended to be potential common OP Unit equivalents. No potential common OP Unit equivalents related to the High Performance Units have been included in diluted earnings per unit for the periods presented because the performance benchmarks were not met or their effect was antidilutive.
F-44
Table of Contents
NOTE 15 — Unaudited Summarized Consolidated Quarterly Information
Summarized unaudited consolidated quarterly information for 2008 and 2007 is provided below (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts).
Quarter (1) | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | First | Second | Third | Fourth | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 349,245 | $ | 374,022 | $ | 375,081 | $ | 359,570 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | (299,995 | ) | (304,590 | ) | (312,932 | ) | (335,634 | ) | ||||||||
Operating income | 49,250 | 69,432 | 62,149 | 23,936 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations (2) | (31,788 | ) | (24,134 | ) | 69,939 | (132,880 | ) | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net | 5,113 | 308,709 | 123,518 | 157,018 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | (26,675 | ) | 284,575 | 193,457 | 24,138 | |||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share — basic (3): | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations (net of income attributable to preferred unitholders) | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) | $ | 0.44 | $ | (1.19 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | 2.02 | $ | 1.40 | $ | 0.07 | |||||||
Earnings (loss) per common unit — diluted (3): | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations (net of income attributable to preferred unitholders) | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) | $ | 0.43 | $ | (1.19 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | 2.02 | $ | 1.40 | $ | 0.07 | |||||||
Weighted average common units outstanding (3) | 137,631 | 133,043 | 127,701 | 124,711 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common units and common unit equivalents outstanding (3) | 137,631 | 133,043 | 128,480 | 124,711 |
Quarter (1) | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | First | Second | Third | Fourth | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 329,154 | $ | 340,859 | $ | 340,454 | $ | 366,353 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | (281,623 | ) | (277,212 | ) | (287,305 | ) | (288,925 | ) | ||||||||
Operating income | 47,531 | 63,647 | 53,149 | 77,428 | ||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations | (7,977 | ) | (8,452 | ) | (23,808 | ) | (17,225 | ) | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net | 35,975 | 30,118 | 21,302 | 4,184 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 27,998 | 21,666 | (2,506 | ) | (13,041 | ) | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common unit — basic (3): | ||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations (net of income attributable to preferred unitholders) | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | ||||||
Earnings (loss) per common unit — diluted (3): | ||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations (net of income attributable to preferred unitholders) | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average common units outstanding (3) | 151,254 | 151,045 | 149,715 | 147,513 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common units and common unit equivalents outstanding (3) | 151,254 | 151,045 | 149,715 | 147,513 |
(1) | Certain reclassifications have been made to 2008 and 2007 quarterly amounts to conform to the full year 2008 presentation, primarily related to treatment of discontinued operations. | |
(2) | Loss from continuing operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, includes a $107.5 million provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets, which is discussed further in Note 2. | |
(3) | Weighted average units, common unit equivalents and earnings per unit amounts for each of the periods presented have been retroactively adjusted for the effect of units issued pursuant to the special distributions discussed in Note 1. |
F-45
Table of Contents
NOTE 16 — Transactions with Affiliates
We earn revenue from affiliated real estate partnerships. These revenues include fees for property management services, partnership and asset management services, risk management services and transactional services such as syndication, refinancing, construction supervisory and disposition. In addition, we are reimbursed for our costs in connection with the management of the unconsolidated real estate partnerships. These fees and reimbursements for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled $74.3 million, $42.1 million and $17.4 million, respectively. The total accounts receivable due from affiliates was $33.5 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5.6 million, at December 31, 2008, and $35.0 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5.3 million, at December 31, 2007.
Additionally, we earn interest income on notes from real estate partnerships in which we are the general partner and hold either par value or discounted notes. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we did not recognize a significant amount of interest income on par value notes from unconsolidated real estate partnerships. Interest income earned on par value notes from unconsolidated real estate partnerships totaled $8.1 million and $4.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized a net reduction of accretion income of $2.7 million, due primarily to revisions in estimates of the timing and amount of payment on certain discounted notes from affiliated real estate partnerships. Accretion income earned on discounted notes from affiliated real estate partnerships totaled $3.4 million and $6.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. See Note 5 for additional information on notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships.
NOTE 17 — Recent Accounting Developments
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R),Business Combinations — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 141, or SFAS 141(R). SFAS 141(R) applies to all transactions or events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses, including those effected without the transfer of consideration, for example, by contract or through a lapse of minority veto rights. SFAS 141(R) requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction (whether a full or partial acquisition); establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; requires expensing of most transaction and restructuring costs; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information needed to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and early adoption is not permitted.
We believe most operating real estate assets meet the revised definition of a business under SFAS 141(R). Accordingly, beginning in 2009, we will expense transaction costs associated with acquisitions of operating real estate or interests therein when we consolidate the asset. SFAS 141(R) does not provide implementation guidance regarding the treatment of acquisition costs incurred prior to December 31, 2008, for acquisitions that do not close until 2009 when SFAS 141(R) is effective. The SEC has indicated any of the following three transition methods are acceptable, provided that the method chosen is disclosed and applied consistently:
1) | expense acquisition costs in 2008 when it is probable that the acquisition will not close in 2008; | ||
2) | expense acquisition costs January 1, 2009, upon adoption of SFAS 141(R); or | ||
3) | give retroactive treatment to the acquisition costs January 1, 2009, upon adoption of SFAS 141(R), by retroactively adjusting prior periods to record acquisition costs in the prior periods in which they were incurred, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154,Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. |
We elected to apply the third method and accordingly expect to retroactively adjust our 2008 results of operations by approximately $3.5 million in our 2009 financial statements. We do not anticipate that the remaining provisions of SFAS 141(R) will have a material effect on our financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51, or SFAS 160. SFAS 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in a consolidated entity which should be reported as equity in the parent’s consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 requires a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of equity attributable to noncontrolling interests and disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statements, of those amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests, eliminating the past practice of reporting these amounts as an adjustment in arriving at consolidated net income. SFAS 160 requires a parent to recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated and requires the parent to attribute to noncontrolling interest their share of losses even if such attribution results in a deficit noncontrolling interest balance within the parent’s equity accounts. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and requires retroactive application of the presentation and disclosure requirements for all periods presented. Early adoption is not permitted.
F-46
Table of Contents
Upon adoption of SFAS 160, we will reclassify the balances related to minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships into our consolidated equity accounts. At December 31, 2008, the carrying amount of minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships was $349.5 million. The $85.2 million of redeemable preferred units at December 31, 2008, discussed in Note 11, will remain classified between liabilities and equity pursuant to the SEC’s Accounting Series Release No. 268Presentation in Financial Statements of “Redeemable Preferred Stock.”Additionally, beginning in 2009, we will no longer record a charge related to cash distributions to minority interests in excess of the carrying amount of such minority interests. Historically these charges have been reported in our consolidated statements of income as deficit distributions and recoveries of deficit distributions to minority partners (included within income from discontinued operations) and totaled $26.0 million and $30.1 million, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2008. Additionally, we will attribute losses to noncontrolling interests even if such attribution results in a deficit noncontrolling interest balance within our equity accounts. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we did not allocate $9.0 million in losses to minority interests in consolidated real estate partnerships with deficit balances.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, or SFAS 161. SFAS 161 expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS 133 to require qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about the fair value of gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures on credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative contracts. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption encouraged. At initial adoption, SFAS 161 also encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods. We do not anticipate SFAS 161 will have a material effect on our financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1,Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities, or the FSP. The FSP clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards that participate in dividends similar to shares of common stock or common partnership units should be treated as participating securities. The FSP may affect the computation of basic earnings per share for unvested restricted stock awards and shares purchased pursuant to officer stock loans, which serve as collateral for such loans, both of which entitle the holders to dividends. The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and quarters within those years. We do not anticipate the FSP will have a material effect on our financial statements.
NOTE 18 — Business Segments
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131,Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, or SFAS 131, requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing such segments’ performance. Several members of our executive management team comprise our chief operating decision maker, as defined in SFAS 131, and use various generally accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance of the business, including: Net Asset Value, which is the estimated fair value of our assets, net of debt, or NAV; Funds From Operations, or FFO; Adjusted Funds From Operations, or AFFO, which is FFO less spending for Capital Replacements; same store property operating results; net operating income; net operating income less spending for capital replacements, or Free Cash Flow; changes in NAV plus cash dividends, or Economic Income; financial coverage ratios; and leverage as shown on our balance sheet. The chief operating decision maker emphasizes net operating income as a key measurement of segment profit or loss. Segment net operating income is generally defined as segment revenues less direct segment operating expenses.
We have two reportable segments: real estate and investment management.
Real Estate Segment
Our real estate segment owns and operates properties that generate rental and other property-related income through the leasing of apartment units to a diverse base of residents. Our real estate segment’s net operating income also includes income from property management services performed for unconsolidated partnerships and unrelated parties.
Investment Management Segment
Our investment management segment includes portfolio strategy, capital allocation, joint ventures, tax credit syndication, acquisitions, dispositions and other transaction activities. Within our owned portfolio, we refer to these activities as “Portfolio Management,” and their benefit is seen in property operating results and in investment gains. For affiliated partnerships, we refer to these activities as “Asset Management,” for which we are separately compensated through fees paid by third party investors. The expenses of this segment consist primarily of the costs of departments that perform these activities. These activities are conducted in part by our taxable subsidiaries, and the related net operating income may be subject to income taxes. Our investment management segment’s operating results also include gains on dispositions of non-depreciable assets, accretion of loan discounts resulting from transactional activities and certain other income in arriving at income (loss) from continuing operations for the segment.
F-47
Table of Contents
The following tables present the revenues, net operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations of our real estate and investment management segments for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
Corporate | ||||||||||||||||
Not Allocated | ||||||||||||||||
Investment | to Segments | |||||||||||||||
Real Estate | Management | and Certain | ||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2008: | ||||||||||||||||
Rental and other property revenues | $ | 1,350,950 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,350,950 | ||||||||
Property management revenues, primarily from affiliates | 6,345 | — | — | 6,345 | ||||||||||||
Asset management and tax credit revenues | — | 101,225 | (602 | ) | 100,623 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | 1,357,295 | 101,225 | (602 | ) | 1,457,918 | |||||||||||
Property operating expenses | 626,001 | — | — | 626,001 | ||||||||||||
Property management expenses | 5,385 | — | — | 5,385 | ||||||||||||
Investment management expenses | — | 21,389 | — | 21,389 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (1) | — | — | 458,595 | 458,595 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | — | — | 99,040 | 99,040 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses, net | — | — | 19,939 | 19,939 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring costs | — | — | 22,802 | 22,802 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 631,386 | 21,389 | 600,376 | 1,253,151 | ||||||||||||
Net operating income (loss) | 725,909 | 79,836 | (600,978 | ) | 204,767 | |||||||||||
Other items included in continuing operations (2) | — | (2,653 | ) | (320,977 | ) | (323,630 | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 725,909 | $ | 77,183 | $ | (921,955 | ) | $ | (118,863 | ) | ||||||
The following tables present the revenues, net operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations of our real estate and investment management segments for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
Investment | Corporate | |||||||||||||||
Real Estate | Management | Not Allocated | ||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | to Segments | Total | |||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||
Rental and other property revenues | $ | 1,296,142 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,296,142 | ||||||||
Property management revenues, primarily from affiliates | 6,923 | — | — | 6,923 | ||||||||||||
Asset management and tax credit revenues | — | 73,755 | — | 73,755 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | 1,303,065 | 73,755 | — | 1,376,820 | ||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | 596,902 | — | — | 596,902 | ||||||||||||
Property management expenses | 6,678 | — | — | 6,678 | ||||||||||||
Investment management expenses | — | 20,514 | — | 20,514 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (1) | — | — | 403,786 | 403,786 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | — | — | 90,667 | 90,667 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses, net | — | — | 16,518 | 16,518 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 603,580 | 20,514 | 510,971 | 1,135,065 | ||||||||||||
Net operating income (loss) | 699,485 | 53,241 | (510,971 | ) | 241,755 | |||||||||||
Other items included in continuing operations (2) | — | 7,312 | (306,529 | ) | (299,217 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 699,485 | $ | 60,553 | $ | (817,500 | ) | $ | (57,462 | ) | ||||||
F-48
Table of Contents
Investment | Corporate | |||||||||||||||
Real Estate | Management | Not Allocated | ||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | to Segments | Total | |||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2006: | ||||||||||||||||
Rental and other property revenues | $ | 1,212,958 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,212,958 | ||||||||
Property management revenues, primarily from affiliates | 12,312 | — | — | 12,312 | ||||||||||||
Asset management and tax credit revenues | — | 48,893 | — | 48,893 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | 1,225,270 | 48,893 | — | 1,274,163 | ||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | 549,716 | — | — | 549,716 | ||||||||||||
Property management expenses | 6,289 | — | — | 6,289 | ||||||||||||
Investment management expenses | — | 14,742 | — | 14,742 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (1) | — | — | 368,783 | 368,783 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | — | — | 91,571 | 91,571 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses, net | — | — | 12,951 | 12,951 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 556,005 | 14,742 | 473,305 | 1,044,052 | ||||||||||||
Net operating income (loss) | 669,265 | 34,151 | (473,305 | ) | 230,111 | |||||||||||
Other items included in continuing operations (2) | — | 9,220 | (293,371 | ) | (284,151 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 669,265 | $ | 43,371 | $ | (766,676 | ) | $ | (54,040 | ) | ||||||
(1) | Our chief operating decision maker assesses the performance of real estate using, among other measures, net operating income, excluding depreciation and amortization. Accordingly, we do not allocate depreciation and amortization to the real estate segment. | |
(2) | Other items in continuing operations for the investment management segment include accretion income recognized on discounted notes receivable, other income items and income taxes associated with transactional activities. Other items in continuing operations not allocated to segments include: (i) interest income and expense; (ii) recoveries of, or provisions for, losses on notes receivable, provision for operating real estate impairment losses and provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets; (iii) deficit distributions to minority partners; (iv) equity in losses of unconsolidated real estate partnerships; (v) gain (losses) on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other; and (vi) minority interests. |
The assets of our reportable segments are as follows (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Total assets for reportable segments(1) | $ | 9,029,386 | $ | 10,306,546 | ||||
Corporate and other assets | 388,622 | 314,051 | ||||||
Total consolidated assets | $ | 9,418,008 | $ | 10,620,597 | ||||
(1) | Total assets for reportable segments primarily relate to the real estate segment. |
Our capital expenditures primarily relate to the real estate segment and totaled $665.2 million, $689.7 million and $512.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
F-49
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
(2) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Initial Cost | Cost Capitalized | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date | Year | Number | Buildings and | Subsequent to | Buildings and | Accumulated | Total Cost Net of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Name | Type | Consolidated | Location | Built | of Units | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (AD) | AD | Encumbrances | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conventional Properties: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 Forest Place | High Rise | Dec-97 | OakPark, IL | 1987 | 234 | 2,664 | 18,815 | 4,071 | 2,664 | 22,886 | 25,550 | (7,928 | ) | 17,622 | 28,152 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1582 First Avenue | High Rise | Mar-05 | New York, NY | 1900 | 17 | 4,250 | 752 | 207 | 4,281 | 928 | 5,209 | (183 | ) | 5,026 | 2,701 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
173 E. 90th Street | High Rise | May-04 | New York, NY | 1910 | 72 | 11,773 | 4,535 | 1,761 | 12,067 | 6,002 | 18,069 | (1,078 | ) | 16,991 | 9,049 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
182-188 Columbus Avenue | Mid Rise | Feb-07 | New York, NY | 1910 | 32 | 17,187 | 3,300 | 2,953 | 19,123 | 4,316 | 23,439 | (469 | ) | 22,970 | 13,471 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
204-206 West 133rd Street | Mid Rise | Jun-07 | New York, NY | 1910 | 44 | 3,291 | 1,450 | 1,898 | 4,352 | 2,287 | 6,639 | (175 | ) | 6,464 | 3,132 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2232-2240 Seventh Avenue | Mid Rise | Jun-07 | New York, NY | 1910 | 24 | 2,863 | 3,785 | 886 | 3,106 | 4,429 | 7,535 | (289 | ) | 7,246 | 2,972 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2247-2253 Seventh Avenue | Mid Rise | Jun-07 | New York, NY | 1910 | 35 | 6,787 | 3,335 | 1,345 | 7,287 | 4,180 | 11,467 | (349 | ) | 11,118 | 5,483 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2252-2258 Seventh Avenue | Mid Rise | Jun-07 | New York, NY | 1910 | 35 | 3,623 | 4,504 | 1,118 | 4,012 | 5,233 | 9,245 | (344 | ) | 8,901 | 5,125 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2300-2310 Seventh Avenue | Mid Rise | Jun-07 | New York, NY | 1910 | 63 | 8,623 | 6,964 | 4,907 | 10,417 | 10,076 | 20,493 | (682 | ) | 19,811 | 9,896 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
236 - 238 East 88th Street | High Rise | Jan-04 | New York, NY | 1900 | 43 | 8,751 | 2,914 | 1,192 | 8,820 | 4,036 | 12,856 | (911 | ) | 11,945 | 7,014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
237-239 Ninth Avenue | High Rise | Mar-05 | New York, NY | 1900 | 36 | 8,430 | 1,866 | 586 | 8,494 | 2,388 | 10,882 | (450 | ) | 10,432 | 5,286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
240 West 73rd Street, LLC | High Rise | Sep-04 | New York, NY | 1900 | 200 | 68,006 | 12,140 | 3,009 | 68,109 | 15,045 | 83,154 | (2,075 | ) | 81,079 | 30,874 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2484 Seventh Avenue | Mid Rise | Jun-07 | New York, NY | 1921 | 23 | 2,384 | 1,726 | 500 | 2,601 | 2,009 | 4,610 | (150 | ) | 4,460 | 2,472 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2900 on First Apartments | Mid Rise | Oct-08 | Seattle, WA | 1989 | 135 | 5,480 | 31,053 | — | 5,535 | 30,998 | 36,533 | (129 | ) | 36,404 | 21,019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
306 East 89th Street | High Rise | Jul-04 | New York, NY | 1930 | 20 | 2,659 | 1,006 | 160 | 2,681 | 1,144 | 3,825 | (276 | ) | 3,549 | 1,929 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
311 & 313 East 73rd Street | Mid Rise | Mar-03 | New York, NY | 1904 | 34 | 5,635 | 1,609 | 539 | 5,678 | 2,104 | 7,782 | (760 | ) | 7,022 | 2,815 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
322-324 East 61st Street | High Rise | Mar-05 | New York, NY | 1900 | 40 | 6,319 | 2,224 | 666 | 6,372 | 2,837 | 9,209 | (518 | ) | 8,691 | 3,752 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3400 Avenue of the Arts | Mid Rise | Mar-02 | Costa Mesa, CA | 1987 | 770 | 55,223 | 65,506 | 69,101 | 57,240 | 132,590 | 189,830 | (20,739 | ) | 169,091 | 125,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
452 East 78th Street | High Rise | Jan-04 | New York, NY | 1900 | 12 | 1,966 | 608 | 274 | 1,982 | 866 | 2,848 | (187 | ) | 2,661 | 1,632 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
464-466 Amsterdam & 200-210 W. 83rd Street | Mid Rise | Feb-07 | New York, NY | 1910 | 72 | 23,677 | 7,101 | 3,321 | 25,552 | 8,547 | 34,099 | (807 | ) | 33,292 | 19,679 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
510 East 88th Street | High Rise | Jan-04 | New York, NY | 1900 | 20 | 3,137 | 1,002 | 262 | 3,163 | 1,238 | 4,401 | (246 | ) | 4,155 | 2,685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
514-516 East 88th Street | High Rise | Mar-05 | New York, NY | 1900 | 36 | 6,230 | 2,168 | 483 | 6,282 | 2,599 | 8,881 | (454 | ) | 8,427 | 4,659 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
656 St. Nicholas Avenue | Mid Rise | Jun-07 | New York, NY | 1920 | 30 | 2,731 | 1,636 | 2,623 | 3,576 | 3,415 | 6,991 | (220 | ) | 6,771 | 2,374 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
759 St. Nicholas Avenue | Mid Rise | Oct-07 | New York, NY | 1920 | 9 | 682 | 535 | 519 | 988 | 749 | 1,737 | (38 | ) | 1,699 | 545 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
865 Bellevue | Garden | Jul-00 | Nashville, TN | 1972 | 326 | 1,526 | 10,158 | 27,549 | 1,526 | 37,707 | 39,233 | (9,959 | ) | 29,274 | 11,078 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anchorage Apartments | Garden | Nov-96 | League City, TX | 1985 | 264 | 1,155 | 7,172 | 3,606 | 1,155 | 10,779 | 11,934 | (3,639 | ) | 8,295 | 7,512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arbors (Grovetree), The | Garden | Oct-97 | Tempe, AZ | 1967 | 200 | 1,092 | 6,208 | 2,651 | 1,092 | 8,860 | 9,952 | (3,597 | ) | 6,355 | 2,397 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arbours Of Hermitage, The | Garden | Jul-00 | Hermitage, TN | 1972 | 350 | 1,627 | 12,455 | 6,557 | 1,627 | 19,012 | 20,639 | (9,148 | ) | 11,491 | 10,447 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ashford, The | Garden | Dec-95 | Atlanta, GA | 1968 | 221 | 2,771 | 8,366 | 25,126 | 2,771 | 33,492 | 36,263 | (10,406 | ) | 25,857 | 7,997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atriums of Plantation | Mid Rise | Aug-98 | Plantation, FL | 1979 | 210 | 1,807 | 10,385 | 2,435 | 1,807 | 12,820 | 14,627 | (4,603 | ) | 10,024 | 6,090 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Auburn Glen | Garden | Dec-06 | Jacksonville, FL | 1974 | 251 | 7,483 | 8,191 | 2,909 | 7,670 | 10,913 | 18,583 | (1,134 | ) | 17,449 | 10,051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autumn Run (IL) | Garden | Oct-02 | Naperville, IL | 1984 | 320 | 2,048 | 16,889 | 3,673 | 2,048 | 20,562 | 22,610 | (8,854 | ) | 13,756 | 18,139 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BaLaye | Garden | Apr-06 | Tampa, FL | 2002 | 324 | 10,329 | 28,800 | 760 | 10,608 | 29,282 | 39,890 | (2,682 | ) | 37,208 | 23,344 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank Lofts | High Rise | Apr-01 | Denver, CO | 1920 | 117 | 3,525 | 9,045 | 1,574 | 3,525 | 10,618 | 14,143 | (3,992 | ) | 10,151 | 7,339 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Barcelona | Garden | Oct-99 | Houston ,TX | 1963 | 127 | 770 | 4,250 | 1,526 | 770 | 5,776 | 6,546 | (2,331 | ) | 4,215 | 2,394 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bay Parc Plaza | High Rise | Sep-04 | Miami, FL | 2000 | 471 | 22,680 | 41,847 | 3,261 | 22,680 | 45,108 | 67,788 | (5,155 | ) | 62,633 | 46,723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bay Ridge at Nashua | Garden | Jan-03 | Nashua, NH | 1984 | 412 | 3,352 | 40,713 | 6,056 | 3,262 | 46,858 | 50,120 | (8,466 | ) | 41,654 | 40,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bayberry Hill Estates | Garden | Aug-02 | Framingham, MA | 1971 | 424 | 18,915 | 35,945 | 8,348 | 18,916 | 44,292 | 63,208 | (11,968 | ) | 51,240 | 26,314 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bayhead Village | Garden | Oct-00 | Indianapolis, IN | 1978 | 202 | 1,411 | 5,139 | 3,305 | 1,411 | 8,444 | 9,855 | (2,939 | ) | 6,916 | 2,901 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beech Lake | Garden | May-99 | Durham, NC | 1986 | 345 | 2,222 | 12,641 | 4,605 | 2,222 | 17,246 | 19,468 | (6,605 | ) | 12,863 | 10,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston Lofts | High Rise | Apr-01 | Denver, CO | 1890 | 158 | 3,447 | 20,589 | 3,002 | 3,447 | 23,591 | 27,038 | (8,320 | ) | 18,718 | 14,744 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boulder Creek | Garden | Jul-94 | Boulder, CO | 1972 | 221 | 755 | 7,730 | 16,934 | 755 | 24,664 | 25,419 | (11,036 | ) | 14,383 | 12,696 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brandywine | Garden | Jul-94 | St. Petersburg, FL | 1971 | 477 | 1,437 | 12,725 | 8,312 | 1,437 | 21,037 | 22,474 | (12,673 | ) | 9,801 | 21,393 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Breakers, The | Garden | Oct-98 | Daytona Beach, FL | 1985 | 208 | 1,008 | 5,507 | 2,974 | 1,008 | 8,481 | 9,489 | (3,446 | ) | 6,043 | 6,540 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Briarwest | Garden | Oct-99 | Houston, TX | 1970 | 380 | 2,459 | 13,868 | 5,218 | 2,459 | 19,086 | 21,545 | (6,551 | ) | 14,994 | 8,516 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Briarwood | Garden | Oct-99 | Houston, TX | 1970 | 351 | 2,033 | 11,857 | 4,047 | 2,033 | 15,904 | 17,937 | (5,459 | ) | 12,478 | 7,087 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bridgeview | Garden | Sep-00 | Tampa, FL | 1988 | 348 | 7,976 | 13,499 | 7,432 | 7,976 | 20,931 | 28,907 | (6,098 | ) | 22,809 | 13,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broadcast Center | Garden | Mar-02 | Los Angeles, CA | 1990 | 279 | 27,603 | 41,244 | 28,054 | 29,407 | 67,495 | 96,902 | (10,998 | ) | 85,904 | 55,875 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broadmoor Ridge | Garden | Dec-97 | Colorado Springs, CO | 1974 | 200 | 460 | 2,917 | 11,807 | 460 | 14,725 | 15,185 | (4,329 | ) | 10,856 | 6,832 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brook Run | Garden | May-98 | Arlington Heights, IL | 1985 | 182 | 2,245 | 12,936 | 2,232 | 2,245 | 15,168 | 17,413 | (6,746 | ) | 10,667 | 11,600 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brookdale Lakes | Garden | May-98 | Naperville, IL | 1990 | 200 | 2,709 | 15,346 | 2,222 | 2,709 | 17,567 | 20,276 | (7,013 | ) | 13,263 | 9,530 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buena Vista | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Pasadena, CA | 1973 | 92 | 9,693 | 6,818 | 1,016 | 9,693 | 7,834 | 17,527 | (341 | ) | 17,186 | 13,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Burke Shire Commons | Garden | Mar-01 | Burke, VA | 1986 | 360 | 4,867 | 23,617 | 3,531 | 4,867 | 27,148 | 32,015 | (9,222 | ) | 22,793 | 45,303 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Calhoun Beach Club | High Rise | Dec-98 | Minneapolis, MN | 1928/1998 | 332 | 11,708 | 73,334 | 45,046 | 11,708 | 118,380 | 130,088 | (35,485 | ) | 94,603 | 49,610 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canterbury Green Apartments | Garden | Dec-99 | Fort Wayne, IN | 1979 | 1,988 | 13,659 | 73,115 | 24,363 | 13,659 | 97,478 | 111,137 | (40,955 | ) | 70,182 | 53,599 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canyon Terrace | Garden | Mar-02 | Saugus, CA | 1984 | 130 | 7,300 | 6,602 | 5,513 | 7,508 | 11,907 | 19,415 | (2,811 | ) | 16,604 | 14,750 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carriage Hill | Garden | Jul-00 | East Lansing, MI | 1972 | 143 | 876 | 9,123 | 1,868 | 875 | 10,991 | 11,866 | (5,156 | ) | 6,710 | 5,360 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Casa del Mar at Baymeadows | Garden | Oct-06 | Jacksonville, FL | 1984 | 144 | 4,902 | 10,562 | 1,318 | 5,039 | 11,743 | 16,782 | (1,054 | ) | 15,728 | 9,566 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Castle Court | High Rise | May-04 | Fall River, MA | 1974 | 240 | 15,239 | 7,850 | 3,453 | 15,244 | 11,298 | 26,542 | (3,266 | ) | 23,276 | 9,910 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cedar Rim | Garden | Apr-00 | New Castle, WA | 1980 | 104 | 751 | 5,043 | 17,109 | 751 | 22,152 | 22,903 | (6,396 | ) | 16,507 | 3,944 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center Square | High Rise | Oct-99 | Doylestown, PA | 1975 | 350 | 582 | 4,190 | 2,625 | 582 | 6,815 | 7,397 | (2,750 | ) | 4,647 | 15,645 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Central Park Townhomes | Town Home | Feb-07 | Park Forest, IL | 1947 | 220 | 3,699 | 12,384 | 2,175 | 3,747 | 14,511 | 18,258 | (1,098 | ) | 17,160 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charleston Landing | Garden | Sep-00 | Brandon, FL | 1985 | 300 | 7,488 | 8,656 | 7,546 | 7,488 | 16,203 | 23,691 | (4,435 | ) | 19,256 | 10,750 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chatham Harbor | Garden | Oct-99 | Altamonte Springs, FL | 1985 | 324 | 2,288 | 13,068 | 3,522 | 2,288 | 16,590 | 18,878 | (5,343 | ) | 13,535 | 7,314 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chelsea Ridge Apartments | Garden | Apr-01 | Wappingers Falls, NY | 1966 | 835 | 10,403 | 33,000 | 46,331 | 10,403 | 79,331 | 89,734 | (28,540 | ) | 61,194 | 32,955 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chesapeake Landing I | Garden | Sep-00 | Aurora, IL | 1986 | 416 | 15,800 | 16,875 | 4,650 | 15,800 | 21,524 | 37,324 | (6,774 | ) | 30,550 | 24,570 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chesapeake Landing II | Garden | Mar-01 | Aurora, IL | 1987 | 184 | 1,969 | 7,980 | 3,104 | 1,969 | 11,084 | 13,053 | (4,190 | ) | 8,863 | 6,237 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chestnut Hall | High Rise | Oct-06 | Philadelphia, PA | 1923 | 315 | 12,047 | 14,299 | 2,567 | 12,338 | 16,576 | 28,914 | (3,648 | ) | 25,266 | 19,006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chestnut Hill (PA) | Garden | Apr-00 | Philadelphia, PA | 1963 | 821 | 6,463 | 49,315 | 44,995 | 6,463 | 94,310 | 100,773 | (29,647 | ) | 71,126 | 51,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chimneys of Cradle Rock | Garden | Jun-04 | Columbia, MD | 1979 | 198 | 2,234 | 8,107 | 188 | 2,040 | 8,489 | 10,529 | (1,902 | ) | 8,627 | 16,966 |
F-50
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
(2) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Initial Cost | Cost Capitalized | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date | Year | Number | Buildings and | Subsequent to | Buildings and | Accumulated | Total Cost Net of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Name | Type | Consolidated | Location | Built | of Units | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (AD) | AD | Encumbrances | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citrus Grove | Garden | Jun-98 | Redlands, CA | 1985 | 198 | 1,118 | 6,642 | 2,028 | 1,118 | 8,670 | 9,788 | (3,612 | ) | 6,176 | 3,502 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colonnade Gardens (Ferntree) | Garden | Oct-97 | Phoenix, AZ | 1973 | 196 | 766 | 4,346 | 2,762 | 766 | 7,108 | 7,874 | (3,156 | ) | 4,718 | 1,776 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colony at Kenilworth | Garden | Oct-99 | Towson, MD | 1966 | 383 | 2,403 | 18,798 | 9,099 | 2,570 | 27,730 | 30,300 | (13,182 | ) | 17,118 | 24,738 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus Avenue | Mid Rise | Sep-03 | New York, NY | 1880 | 59 | 35,472 | 9,450 | 3,172 | 35,527 | 12,567 | 48,094 | (3,682 | ) | 44,412 | 26,274 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country Lakes I | Garden | Apr-01 | Naperville, IL | 1982 | 240 | 8,512 | 10,832 | 3,050 | 8,512 | 13,882 | 22,394 | (4,528 | ) | 17,866 | 14,736 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country Lakes II | Garden | May-97 | Naperville, IL | 1986 | 400 | 5,165 | 29,430 | 5,198 | 5,165 | 34,627 | 39,792 | (12,864 | ) | 26,928 | 25,225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Covington Pointe | Garden | Oct-05 | Dallas, TX | 1984 | 180 | 1,373 | 9,500 | 1,332 | 1,373 | 10,832 | 12,205 | (6,274 | ) | 5,931 | 4,796 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Creekside | Garden | Jan-00 | Denver, CO | 1974 | 328 | 1,743 | 14,072 | 2,725 | 1,980 | 16,560 | 18,540 | (7,222 | ) | 11,318 | 14,549 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Creekside (CA) | Garden | Mar-02 | Simi Valley, CA | 1985 | 397 | 24,595 | 18,818 | 6,268 | 25,245 | 24,435 | 49,680 | (6,897 | ) | 42,783 | 40,670 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crescent at West Hollywood, The | Mid Rise | Mar-02 | West Hollywood, CA | 1982 | 130 | 15,382 | 10,215 | 12,831 | 15,765 | 22,663 | 38,428 | (5,960 | ) | 32,468 | 24,195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crossroads | Garden | May-98 | Phoenix, AZ | 1982 | 316 | 2,180 | 12,661 | 3,267 | 2,180 | 15,928 | 18,108 | (7,474 | ) | 10,634 | 4,940 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crosswood | Garden | Jan-06 | Citrus Heights, CA | 1976 | 180 | 6,944 | 8,169 | 732 | 6,944 | 8,901 | 15,845 | (510 | ) | 15,335 | 13,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deer Creek | Garden | Apr-00 | Plainsboro, NJ | 1975 | 288 | 2,404 | 17,096 | 5,012 | 2,404 | 22,108 | 24,512 | (9,655 | ) | 14,857 | 23,235 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deercross (IN) | Garden | Oct-00 | Indianapolis, IN | 1979 | 372 | 3,175 | 10,426 | 6,155 | 3,175 | 16,582 | 19,757 | (6,040 | ) | 13,717 | 10,700 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defoors Crossing | Garden | Jan-06 | Atlanta, GA | 1987 | 60 | 348 | 957 | 300 | 348 | 1,258 | 1,606 | (1,134 | ) | 472 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Doral Oaks | Garden | Dec-97 | Temple Terrace, FL | 1967 | 252 | 2,095 | 3,943 | 14,471 | 2,095 | 18,414 | 20,509 | (7,066 | ) | 13,443 | 3,705 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Douglaston Villas and Townhomes | Garden | Aug-99 | Altamonte Springs, FL | 1979 | 234 | 1,666 | 9,353 | 6,498 | 1,666 | 15,851 | 17,517 | (5,121 | ) | 12,396 | 10,632 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dunes Apartment Homes, The | Garden | Oct-99 | Indian Harbour Beach, FL | 1963 | 200 | 1,211 | 5,901 | 3,071 | 1,211 | 8,972 | 10,183 | (4,396 | ) | 5,787 | 3,152 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elm Creek | Mid Rise | Dec-97 | Elmhurst, IL | 1986 | 372 | 5,534 | 30,830 | 17,156 | 5,628 | 47,892 | 53,520 | (15,471 | ) | 38,049 | 30,548 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evanston Place | High Rise | Dec-97 | Evanston, IL | 1988 | 189 | 3,232 | �� | 25,546 | 4,237 | 3,232 | 29,783 | 33,015 | (9,116 | ) | 23,899 | 21,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairlane East | Garden | Jan-01 | Dearborn, MI | 1973 | 244 | 6,550 | 11,711 | 4,837 | 6,550 | 16,548 | 23,098 | (7,549 | ) | 15,549 | 10,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairway | Garden | Jan-00 | Plano, TX | 1978 | 256 | 2,961 | 5,137 | 5,342 | 2,961 | 10,479 | 13,440 | (4,951 | ) | 8,489 | 8,982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Farmingdale | Mid Rise | Oct-00 | Darien, IL | 1975 | 240 | 11,763 | 15,174 | 9,098 | 11,763 | 24,272 | 36,035 | (7,561 | ) | 28,474 | 18,090 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ferntree | Garden | Mar-01 | Phoenix, AZ | 1968 | 219 | 2,078 | 13,752 | 2,846 | 2,079 | 16,598 | 18,677 | (5,463 | ) | 13,214 | 7,133 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fisherman’s Landing | Garden | Dec-97 | Bradenton, FL | 1984 | 200 | 1,276 | 7,170 | 6,915 | 1,276 | 14,085 | 15,361 | (4,370 | ) | 10,991 | 7,966 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fisherman’s Landing | Garden | Sep-98 | Temple Terrace, FL | 1986 | 256 | 1,643 | 9,446 | 3,506 | 1,643 | 12,952 | 14,595 | (5,020 | ) | 9,575 | 11,937 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fisherman’s Village | Garden | Jan-06 | Indianapolis, IN | 1982 | 328 | 964 | 11,129 | 2,424 | 964 | 13,553 | 14,517 | (6,489 | ) | 8,028 | 6,350 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fisherman’s Wharf Apartments | Garden | Nov-96 | Clute, TX | 1981 | 360 | 1,257 | 7,584 | 4,471 | 1,257 | 12,055 | 13,312 | (5,115 | ) | 8,197 | 2,195 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flamingo Towers | High Rise | Sep-97 | Miami, FL | 1960/2005 | 1,127 | 32,191 | 38,399 | 216,641 | 32,239 | 254,993 | 287,232 | (76,989 | ) | 210,243 | 158,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forestlake Apartments | Garden | Mar-07 | Daytona Beach, FL | 1982 | 120 | 3,691 | 4,320 | 361 | 3,860 | 4,512 | 8,372 | (369 | ) | 8,003 | 4,807 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Four Quarters Habitat | Garden | Jan-06 | Miami, FL | 1976 | 336 | 1,532 | 23,615 | 12,385 | 1,528 | 36,004 | 37,532 | (15,182 | ) | 22,350 | 12,317 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fox Run (NJ) | Garden | Jan-00 | Plainsboro, NJ | 1973 | 776 | 8,029 | 51,843 | 15,513 | 8,022 | 67,363 | 75,385 | (22,981 | ) | 52,404 | 27,596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foxchase | Garden | Dec-97 | Alexandria, VA | 1947 | 2,113 | 15,419 | 96,062 | 29,828 | 15,496 | 125,813 | 141,309 | (50,071 | ) | 91,238 | 188,012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Franklin Oaks | Garden | May-98 | Franklin, TN | 1987 | 468 | 3,936 | 22,832 | 8,664 | 3,936 | 31,497 | 35,433 | (12,308 | ) | 23,125 | 12,620 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Georgetown (MA) | Garden | Aug-02 | Framingham, MA | 1964 | 207 | 12,351 | 13,168 | 1,991 | 12,351 | 15,159 | 27,510 | (3,920 | ) | 23,590 | 13,442 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Glen at Forestlake, The | Garden | Mar-07 | Daytona Beach, FL | 1982 | 26 | 897 | 862 | 138 | 933 | 963 | 1,896 | (81 | ) | 1,815 | 1,055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Glenbridge Manors | Garden | Sep-03 | Cincinnati, OH | 1978 | 273 | 1,030 | 17,447 | 11,402 | 1,031 | 28,849 | 29,880 | (6,557 | ) | 23,323 | 19,283 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granada | Mid Rise | Aug-02 | Framingham, MA | 1958 | 72 | 4,577 | 4,058 | 840 | 4,577 | 4,897 | 9,474 | (1,711 | ) | 7,763 | 4,497 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Pointe | Garden | Dec-99 | Columbia, MD | 1974 | 325 | 2,715 | 16,771 | 4,912 | 2,715 | 21,683 | 24,398 | (7,159 | ) | 17,239 | 17,267 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greens (AZ) | Garden | Jul-94 | Chandler, AZ | 2000 | 324 | 2,303 | 713 | 27,043 | 2,303 | 27,755 | 30,058 | (10,169 | ) | 19,889 | 13,564 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greenspoint Apartments | Garden | Jan-00 | Phoenix, AZ | 1985 | 336 | 2,176 | 14,881 | 12,188 | 2,176 | 27,069 | 29,245 | (10,058 | ) | 19,187 | 16,668 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greentree | Garden | Dec-96 | Carrollton, TX | 1983 | 365 | 1,774 | 9,440 | 5,449 | 1,774 | 14,889 | 16,663 | (6,284 | ) | 10,379 | 7,166 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hampden Heights | Garden | Jan-00 | Denver, CO | 1973 | 376 | 2,023 | 14,298 | 4,040 | 2,251 | 18,110 | 20,361 | (8,047 | ) | 12,314 | 14,010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harbor Town at Jacaranda | Garden | Sep-00 | Plantation, FL | 1988 | 280 | 9,776 | 10,643 | 6,257 | 9,776 | 16,900 | 26,676 | (4,529 | ) | 22,147 | 11,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harbour, The | Garden | Mar-01 | Melbourne, FL | 1987 | 162 | 4,108 | 3,563 | 2,700 | 4,108 | 6,263 | 10,371 | (2,502 | ) | 7,869 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heritage Park at Alta Loma | Garden | Jan-01 | Alta Loma, CA | 1986 | 232 | 1,200 | 6,428 | 3,301 | 1,200 | 9,730 | 10,930 | (3,271 | ) | 7,659 | 7,264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heritage Park Escondido | Garden | Oct-00 | Escondido, CA | 1986 | 196 | 1,055 | 7,578 | 1,242 | 1,055 | 8,820 | 9,875 | (3,764 | ) | 6,111 | 7,299 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heritage Park Livermore | Garden | Oct-00 | Livermore, CA | 1988 | 167 | 1,039 | 9,185 | 1,177 | 1,039 | 10,361 | 11,400 | (4,260 | ) | 7,140 | 7,432 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heritage Park Montclair | Garden | Mar-01 | Montclair, CA | 1985 | 144 | 690 | 4,149 | 865 | 690 | 5,014 | 5,704 | (1,620 | ) | 4,084 | 4,620 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heritage Village Anaheim | Garden | Oct-00 | Anaheim, CA | 1986 | 196 | 1,835 | 8,554 | 1,471 | 1,835 | 10,025 | 11,860 | (4,361 | ) | 7,499 | 8,858 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hidden Cove (CA) | Garden | Jul-98 | Escondido, CA | 1985 | 334 | 3,043 | 17,615 | 6,606 | 3,043 | 24,222 | 27,265 | (9,016 | ) | 18,249 | 14,966 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hidden Cove II | Garden | Jul-07 | Escondido, CA | 1986 | 118 | 12,730 | 6,530 | 5,092 | 12,849 | 11,504 | 24,353 | (733 | ) | 23,620 | 12,809 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hidden Harbour | Garden | Oct-02 | Melbourne, FL | 1985 | 216 | 984 | 8,050 | 1,892 | 984 | 9,942 | 10,926 | (2,888 | ) | 8,038 | 6,748 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Highcrest Townhomes | Town Home | Jan-03 | Woodridge, IL | 1968 | 176 | 3,045 | 13,452 | 1,118 | 3,045 | 14,571 | 17,616 | (5,487 | ) | 12,129 | 11,019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Highland Ridge | Garden | Sep-04 | Atlanta, GA | 1984 | 219 | 1,162 | 6,997 | 4,879 | 1,179 | 11,859 | 13,038 | (4,597 | ) | 8,441 | 6,100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hillcreste (CA) | Garden | Mar-02 | Los Angeles, CA | 1989 | 315 | 33,755 | 47,216 | 24,452 | 35,862 | 69,561 | 105,423 | (16,335 | ) | 89,088 | 58,559 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hillmeade | Garden | Nov-94 | Nashville, TN | 1985 | 288 | 2,872 | 16,069 | 12,479 | 2,872 | 28,549 | 31,421 | (15,814 | ) | 15,607 | 18,660 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hills at the Arboretum, The | Garden | Oct-97 | Austin, TX | 1983 | 327 | 1,367 | 7,764 | 14,358 | 1,367 | 22,122 | 23,489 | (7,102 | ) | 16,387 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Homestead | Garden | Apr-05 | East Lansing, MI | 1986 | 168 | 825 | 9,252 | 512 | 825 | 9,763 | 10,588 | (3,823 | ) | 6,765 | 3,549 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Horizons West Apartments | Mid Rise | Dec-06 | Pacifica, CA | 1970 | 78 | 8,763 | 6,376 | 1,105 | 8,887 | 7,357 | 16,244 | (658 | ) | 15,586 | 5,494 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hudson Harbour | Garden | Apr-07 | Poughkeepsie, NY | 1980 | 352 | 17,640 | 18,679 | 851 | 17,714 | 19,455 | 37,169 | (1,607 | ) | 35,562 | 23,318 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunt Club (MD) | Garden | Sep-00 | Gaithersburg, MD | 1986 | 336 | 17,859 | 13,149 | 3,426 | 17,859 | 16,575 | 34,434 | (5,652 | ) | 28,782 | 32,160 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunt Club (TX) | Garden | Mar-01 | Austin, TX | 1987 | 384 | 10,342 | 11,920 | 7,872 | 10,342 | 19,792 | 30,134 | (8,238 | ) | 21,896 | 18,361 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunter’s Chase (VA) | Garden | Jan-01 | Midlothian, VA | 1985 | 320 | 7,987 | 7,863 | 3,007 | 7,987 | 10,871 | 18,858 | (2,870 | ) | 15,988 | 16,630 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunter’s Crossing (VA) | Garden | Apr-01 | Leesburg, VA | 1967 | 164 | 2,244 | 7,763 | 3,782 | 2,244 | 11,544 | 13,788 | (5,352 | ) | 8,436 | 7,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunters Glen IV | Garden | Oct-99 | Plainsboro, NJ | 1976 | 264 | 2,264 | 15,036 | 4,552 | 2,264 | 19,588 | 21,852 | (8,798 | ) | 13,054 | 20,501 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunters Glen V | Garden | Oct-99 | Plainsboro, NJ | 1977 | 304 | 2,735 | 18,079 | 4,915 | 2,735 | 22,994 | 25,729 | (10,270 | ) | 15,459 | 24,504 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunters Glen VI | Garden | Oct-99 | Plainsboro, NJ | 1977 | 328 | 2,418 | 16,083 | 5,744 | 2,418 | 21,827 | 24,245 | (10,554 | ) | 13,691 | 25,504 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntington Athletic Club | Garden | Oct-99 | Morrisville, NC | 1986 | 212 | 1,650 | 11,265 | 3,315 | 1,650 | 14,580 | 16,230 | (7,165 | ) | 9,065 | 7,549 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyde Park Tower | High Rise | Oct-04 | Chicago, IL | 1990 | 155 | 4,683 | 14,928 | 1,839 | 4,731 | 16,719 | 21,450 | (2,207 | ) | 19,243 | 13,569 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Independence Green | Garden | Jan-06 | Farmington Hills, MI | 1960 | 981 | 10,293 | 24,830 | 19,287 | 10,156 | 44,254 | 54,410 | (10,525 | ) | 43,885 | 28,121 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indian Oaks | Garden | Mar-02 | Simi Valley, CA | 1986 | 254 | 23,927 | 15,801 | 3,037 | 24,523 | 18,242 | 42,765 | (5,029 | ) | 37,736 | 33,600 |
F-51
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
(2) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Initial Cost | Cost Capitalized | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date | Year | Number | Buildings and | Subsequent to | Buildings and | Accumulated | Total Cost Net of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Name | Type | Consolidated | Location | Built | of Units | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (AD) | AD | Encumbrances | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Island Club (Beville) | Garden | Oct-00 | Daytona Beach, FL | 1986 | 204 | 6,086 | 8,571 | 1,833 | 6,087 | 10,404 | 16,491 | (3,595 | ) | 12,896 | 8,440 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Island Club (CA) | Garden | Oct-00 | Oceanside, CA | 1986 | 592 | 18,027 | 28,654 | 10,560 | 18,027 | 39,214 | 57,241 | (13,272 | ) | 43,969 | 37,664 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Island Club (Palm Aire) | Garden | Oct-00 | Pomano Beach, FL | 1988 | 260 | 7,615 | 7,652 | 7,292 | 8,336 | 14,224 | 22,560 | (4,323 | ) | 18,237 | 11,835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Towers | High Rise | Apr-01 | Alexandria, VA | 1964 | 140 | 1,526 | 7,050 | 3,070 | 1,526 | 10,121 | 11,647 | (4,130 | ) | 7,517 | 10,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Knolls, The | Garden | Jul-02 | Colorado Springs, CO | 1972 | 262 | 3,122 | 13,178 | 10,457 | 3,122 | 23,635 | 26,757 | (12,367 | ) | 14,390 | 7,617 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lake Castleton | Garden | May-99 | Indianapolis, IN | 1997 | 1,261 | 5,183 | 29,888 | 11,574 | 5,183 | 41,462 | 46,645 | (16,467 | ) | 30,178 | 28,746 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lake Johnson Mews | Garden | Oct-99 | Raleigh, NC | 1972 | 201 | 1,358 | 10,022 | 4,973 | 1,358 | 14,996 | 16,354 | (7,753 | ) | 8,601 | 8,061 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lakeside (IL) | Garden | Oct-99 | Lisle, IL | 1972 | 568 | 4,358 | 29,419 | 27,070 | 4,358 | 56,488 | 60,846 | (17,419 | ) | 43,427 | 29,608 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lakeside at Vinings Mountain | Garden | Jan-00 | Atlanta, GA | 1983 | 220 | 1,459 | 13,250 | 14,415 | 1,459 | 27,665 | 29,124 | (9,215 | ) | 19,909 | 6,070 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lakeside Place | Garden | Oct-99 | Houston, TX | 1976 | 734 | 4,837 | 35,474 | 12,616 | 4,837 | 48,090 | 52,927 | (19,984 | ) | 32,943 | 27,219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lakewood | Garden | Jul-02 | Tomball, TX | 1979 | 256 | 801 | 8,328 | 2,920 | 801 | 11,248 | 12,049 | (4,982 | ) | 7,067 | 4,238 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lamplighter Park | Garden | Apr-00 | Bellevue, WA | 1967 | 174 | 2,262 | 9,282 | 3,811 | 2,262 | 13,093 | 15,355 | (5,836 | ) | 9,519 | 10,700 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Landmark | Garden | Apr-00 | Raleigh, NC | 1970 | 292 | 1,845 | 13,621 | 3,815 | 2,189 | 17,093 | 19,282 | (8,811 | ) | 10,471 | 8,535 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latrobe | High Rise | Jan-03 | Washington, DC | 1980 | 176 | 1,305 | 11,257 | 15,038 | 1,305 | 26,296 | 27,601 | (8,250 | ) | 19,351 | 22,372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lazy Hollow | Garden | Apr-05 | Columbia, MD | 1979 | 178 | 1,248 | 13,867 | 874 | 1,248 | 14,741 | 15,989 | (5,519 | ) | 10,470 | 8,243 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leahy Square | Garden | Apr-07 | Redwood City, CA | 1973 | 110 | 15,352 | 7,909 | 1,292 | 15,444 | 9,109 | 24,553 | (686 | ) | 23,867 | 15,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lewis Park | Garden | Jan-06 | Carbondale, IL | 1972 | 269 | 1,420 | 12,180 | 2,409 | 1,417 | 14,592 | 16,009 | (8,434 | ) | 7,575 | 4,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lighthouse at Twin Lakes | Garden | Apr-00 | Beltsville, MD | 1969 | 700 | 3,695 | 25,543 | 11,114 | 3,695 | 36,657 | 40,352 | (10,346 | ) | 30,006 | 48,329 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lincoln Place Garden | Garden | Oct-04 | Venice, CA | 1951 | 755 | 43,979 | 10,439 | 67,108 | 42,894 | 78,632 | 121,526 | (1,527 | ) | 119,999 | 72,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lodge at Chattahoochee, The | Garden | Oct-99 | Atlanta, GA | 1970 | 312 | 2,320 | 16,370 | 21,022 | 2,320 | 37,392 | 39,712 | (11,604 | ) | 28,108 | 9,320 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Arboles | Garden | Sep-97 | Chandler, AZ | 1985 | 232 | 1,662 | 9,504 | 2,966 | 1,662 | 12,470 | 14,132 | (5,236 | ) | 8,896 | 4,868 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Malibu Canyon | Garden | Mar-02 | Calabasas, CA | 1986 | 698 | 66,257 | 53,438 | 32,749 | 69,834 | 82,609 | 152,443 | (24,659 | ) | 127,784 | 98,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maple Bay | Garden | Dec-99 | Virginia Beach, VA | 1971 | 414 | 2,598 | 16,141 | 29,594 | 2,598 | 45,735 | 48,333 | (11,216 | ) | 37,117 | 33,973 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mariners Cove | Garden | Mar-02 | San Diego, CA | 1984 | 500 | — | 66,861 | 6,930 | 1,000 | 72,792 | 73,792 | (15,980 | ) | 57,812 | 6,661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meadow Creek | Garden | Jul-94 | Boulder, CO | 1972 | 332 | 1,435 | 24,532 | 6,066 | 1,435 | 30,598 | 32,033 | (11,967 | ) | 20,066 | 24,378 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merrill House | High Rise | Jan-00 | Falls Church, VA | 1962 | 159 | 1,836 | 10,831 | 2,306 | 1,836 | 13,137 | 14,973 | (3,837 | ) | 11,136 | 15,600 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Montecito | Garden | Jul-94 | Austin, TX | 1985 | 268 | 1,268 | 6,896 | 4,700 | 1,268 | 11,596 | 12,864 | (5,710 | ) | 7,154 | 1,052 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey Grove | Garden | Jun-08 | San Jose, CA | 1999 | 224 | 34,175 | 21,939 | 747 | 34,270 | 22,590 | 56,860 | (655 | ) | 56,205 | 35,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mountain View | Garden | May-98 | Colorado Springs, CO | 1985 | 252 | 2,546 | 14,841 | 2,668 | 2,546 | 17,509 | 20,055 | (7,185 | ) | 12,870 | 6,288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mountain View (CA) | Garden | Jan-06 | San Dimas, CA | 1978 | 168 | 8,500 | 16,656 | 2,231 | 8,500 | 18,886 | 27,386 | (1,084 | ) | 26,302 | 23,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newport | Garden | Jul-94 | Avondale, AZ | 1986 | 204 | 800 | 4,354 | 3,387 | 800 | 7,742 | 8,542 | (3,612 | ) | 4,930 | 1,801 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oak Falls Condominiums | Garden | Nov-96 | Spring, TX | 1983 | 144 | 1,017 | 5,420 | 2,590 | 1,017 | 8,010 | 9,027 | (2,459 | ) | 6,568 | 3,441 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oak Park Village I | Garden | Oct-00 | Lansing, MI | 1973 | 618 | 10,048 | 16,771 | 6,930 | 10,048 | 23,701 | 33,749 | (11,512 | ) | 22,237 | 23,487 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ocean Oaks | Garden | May-98 | Port Orange, FL | 1988 | 296 | 2,132 | 12,855 | 3,045 | 2,132 | 15,900 | 18,032 | (5,849 | ) | 12,183 | 10,295 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ocean View Apartment | Garden | Oct-06 | Pacifica, CA | 1963 | 63 | 7,975 | 4,131 | 1,257 | 8,108 | 5,255 | 13,363 | (432 | ) | 12,931 | 6,526 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Lytle Place | High Rise | Jan-00 | Cincinnati ,OH | 1980 | 231 | 2,662 | 21,800 | 12,058 | 2,662 | 33,858 | 36,520 | (10,058 | ) | 26,462 | 15,450 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacific Bay Vistas | Garden | Mar-01 | San Bruno, CA | 1987 | 308 | 3,703 | 62,460 | 19,987 | 22,993 | 63,157 | 86,150 | (55,442 | ) | 30,708 | 26,060 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacifica Park | Garden | Jul-06 | Pacifica, CA | 1977 | 104 | 12,770 | 6,579 | 3,119 | 12,970 | 9,498 | 22,468 | (1,524 | ) | 20,944 | 11,456 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Palazzo at Park La Brea | Mid Rise | Feb-04 | Los Angeles, CA | 2002 | 521 | 47,822 | 125,464 | 7,878 | 48,362 | 132,803 | 181,165 | (24,119 | ) | 157,046 | 127,068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Palazzo East at Park La Brea | Mid Rise | Mar-05 | Los Angeles, CA | 2005 | 611 | 61,004 | 136,503 | 19,904 | 72,615 | 144,796 | 217,411 | (20,299 | ) | 197,112 | 150,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Palencia | Garden | May-98 | Tampa, FL | 1985 | 420 | 2,804 | 16,262 | 10,921 | 2,804 | 27,183 | 29,987 | (10,229 | ) | 19,758 | 11,598 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paradise Palms | Garden | Jul-94 | Phoenix, AZ | 1985 | 129 | 647 | 3,515 | 6,438 | 647 | 9,954 | 10,601 | (4,661 | ) | 5,940 | 6,481 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Park at Cedar Lawn, The | Garden | Nov-96 | Galveston, TX | 1985 | 192 | 1,025 | 2,521 | 2,257 | 1,025 | 4,779 | 5,804 | (3,382 | ) | 2,422 | 3,752 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Park Towne | High Rise | Apr-00 | Philadelphia, PA | 1959 | 958 | 10,451 | 47,301 | 51,905 | 10,451 | 99,206 | 109,657 | (18,221 | ) | 91,436 | 87,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parktown Townhouses | Garden | Oct-99 | Deer Park, TX | 1968 | 309 | 1,772 | 13,725 | 9,819 | 1,772 | 23,545 | 25,317 | (8,268 | ) | 17,049 | 5,938 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parkway (VA) | Garden | Mar-00 | Willamsburg, VA | 1971 | 148 | 386 | 2,834 | 2,579 | 386 | 5,413 | 5,799 | (2,951 | ) | 2,848 | 9,409 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pathfinder Village | Garden | Jan-06 | Fremont, CA | 1973 | 246 | 19,595 | 14,838 | 5,628 | 19,595 | 20,466 | 40,061 | (887 | ) | 39,174 | 23,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peachtree Park | Garden | Jan-96 | Atlanta, GA | 1962/1995 | 303 | 4,683 | 11,713 | 9,862 | 4,683 | 21,575 | 26,258 | (8,805 | ) | 17,453 | 9,834 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peakview Place | Garden | Jan-00 | Englewood, CO | 1975 | 296 | 2,067 | 20,438 | 4,362 | 2,067 | 24,800 | 26,867 | (14,026 | ) | 12,841 | 12,844 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pebble Point | Garden | Oct-02 | Indianapolis, IN | 1980 | 220 | 1,790 | 6,883 | 2,339 | 1,790 | 9,222 | 11,012 | (4,013 | ) | 6,999 | 5,430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peppertree | Garden | Mar-02 | Cypress, CA | 1971 | 136 | 7,835 | 5,224 | 1,873 | 8,030 | 6,902 | 14,932 | (2,367 | ) | 12,565 | 15,750 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pine Lake Terrace | Garden | Mar-02 | Garden Grove, CA | 1971 | 111 | 3,975 | 6,035 | 1,872 | 4,125 | 7,758 | 11,883 | (2,134 | ) | 9,749 | 12,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pine Shadows | Garden | May-98 | Phoenix, AZ | 1983 | 272 | 2,095 | 11,899 | 3,534 | 2,095 | 15,433 | 17,528 | (6,572 | ) | 10,956 | 7,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pines, The | Garden | Oct-98 | Palm Bay, FL | 1984 | 216 | 603 | 3,318 | 2,277 | 603 | 5,595 | 6,198 | (2,117 | ) | 4,081 | 1,975 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plantation Gardens | Garden | Oct-99 | Plantation ,FL | 1971 | 372 | 3,793 | 19,601 | 5,386 | 3,793 | 24,987 | 28,780 | (9,958 | ) | 18,822 | 24,463 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pointe At Stone Canyon, The | Garden | Jan-06 | Dallas, TX | 1978 | 164 | 878 | 4,401 | 1,816 | 878 | 6,217 | 7,095 | (3,545 | ) | 3,550 | 2,431 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post Ridge | Garden | Jul-00 | Nashville, TN | 1972 | 150 | 943 | 6,680 | 2,616 | 943 | 9,296 | 10,239 | (4,634 | ) | 5,605 | 6,119 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Presidential House | Mid Rise | Sep-05 | North Miami Beach, FL | 1963 | 203 | 1,379 | 10,635 | 3,051 | 1,379 | 13,686 | 15,065 | (5,092 | ) | 9,973 | 10,044 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preston Creek | Garden | Oct-99 | Dallas, TX | 1979 | 228 | 1,543 | 8,667 | 5,586 | 1,543 | 14,253 | 15,796 | (7,465 | ) | 8,331 | 8,784 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quail Run | Garden | Oct-99 | Zionsville, IN | 1972 | 166 | 1,222 | 6,803 | 1,512 | 1,222 | 8,316 | 9,538 | (3,628 | ) | 5,910 | 4,533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ramblewood Apartments (MI) | Garden | Dec-99 | Wyoming, MI | 1973 | 1,708 | 8,607 | 61,082 | — | 8,607 | 61,082 | 69,689 | (9,266 | ) | 60,423 | 28,676 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ravensworth Towers | High Rise | Jun-04 | Annandale, VA | 1974 | 219 | 2,172 | 18,607 | 2,108 | 2,172 | 20,714 | 22,886 | (8,931 | ) | 13,955 | 21,163 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reflections (Casselberry) | Garden | Oct-02 | Casselberry, FL | 1984 | 336 | 3,906 | 10,491 | 3,706 | 3,906 | 14,197 | 18,103 | (3,831 | ) | 14,272 | 10,700 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reflections (Virginia Beach) | Garden | Sep-00 | Virginia Beach, VA | 1987 | 480 | 15,988 | 13,684 | 4,761 | 15,988 | 18,444 | 34,432 | (6,736 | ) | 27,696 | 38,932 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reflections (West Palm Beach) | Garden | Oct-00 | West Palm Beach, FL | 1986 | 300 | 5,504 | 9,984 | 3,813 | 5,504 | 13,797 | 19,301 | (4,562 | ) | 14,739 | 8,344 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regency Oaks | Garden | Oct-99 | Fern Park, FL | 1965 | 343 | 1,842 | 10,029 | 7,836 | 1,842 | 17,866 | 19,708 | (9,128 | ) | 10,580 | 11,280 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remington at Ponte Vedra Lakes | Garden | Dec-06 | Ponte Vedra Beach, FL | 1986 | 344 | 18,576 | 18,650 | 1,917 | 18,795 | 20,348 | 39,143 | (2,076 | ) | 37,067 | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
River Club | Garden | Apr-05 | Edgewater, NJ | 1998 | 266 | 30,578 | 30,638 | 1,479 | 30,579 | 32,116 | 62,695 | (4,790 | ) | 57,905 | 40,749 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
River Reach | Garden | Sep-00 | Naples, FL | 1986 | 556 | 17,728 | 18,337 | 5,688 | 17,728 | 24,025 | 41,753 | (8,755 | ) | 32,998 | 36,254 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Riverbend Village | Garden | Jul-01 | Arlington, TX | 1983 | 201 | 893 | 4,128 | 4,649 | 893 | 8,777 | 9,670 | (3,285 | ) | 6,385 | 5,164 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Riverloft Apartments | High Rise | Oct-99 | Philadelphia, PA | 1910 | 184 | 2,120 | 11,287 | 31,053 | 2,120 | 42,340 | 44,460 | (14,165 | ) | 30,295 | 20,962 |
F-52
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
(2) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Initial Cost | Cost Capitalized | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date | Year | Number | Buildings and | Subsequent to | Buildings and | Accumulated | Total Cost Net of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Name | Type | Consolidated | Location | Built | of Units | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (AD) | AD | Encumbrances | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Riverside Park | High Rise | Apr-00 | Alexandria ,VA | 1973 | 1,222 | 9,286 | 71,911 | 74,603 | 9,285 | 146,514 | 155,799 | (51,669 | ) | 104,130 | 96,440 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rosewood | Garden | Mar-02 | Camarillo, CA | 1976 | 152 | 12,128 | 8,060 | 2,400 | 12,430 | 10,157 | 22,587 | (2,871 | ) | 19,716 | 17,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Crest Estates (Fall River) | Garden | Aug-02 | Fall River, MA | 1974 | 216 | 5,832 | 12,044 | 1,841 | 5,832 | 13,885 | 19,717 | (5,046 | ) | 14,671 | 12,610 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Crest Estates (Marlboro) | Garden | Aug-02 | Marlborough, MA | 1970 | 473 | 25,178 | 28,786 | 3,231 | 25,178 | 32,017 | 57,195 | (11,943 | ) | 45,252 | 27,792 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Crest Estates (Nashua) | Garden | Aug-02 | Nashua, MA | 1970 | 902 | 68,231 | 45,562 | 9,164 | 68,231 | 54,725 | 122,956 | (19,321 | ) | 103,635 | 53,076 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Crest Estates (North Andover) | Garden | Aug-02 | North Andover, MA | 1970 | 588 | 51,292 | 36,808 | 9,130 | 51,292 | 45,938 | 97,230 | (16,568 | ) | 80,662 | 60,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Crest Estates (Warwick) | Garden | Aug-02 | Warwick, RI | 1972 | 492 | 22,433 | 24,095 | 5,097 | 22,433 | 29,192 | 51,625 | (10,425 | ) | 41,200 | 38,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Palms | Garden | Jul-94 | Mesa, AZ | 1985 | 152 | 832 | 4,569 | 9,425 | 832 | 13,994 | 14,826 | (3,979 | ) | 10,847 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Runaway Bay | Garden | Jul-02 | Pinellas Park, FL | 1986 | 192 | 1,884 | 7,045 | 1,625 | 1,884 | 8,670 | 10,554 | (1,982 | ) | 8,572 | 9,153 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Runaway Bay (FL) | Garden | Oct-00 | Lantana, FL | 1987 | 404 | 5,934 | 16,052 | 6,895 | 5,934 | 22,947 | 28,881 | (6,610 | ) | 22,271 | 21,458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Runaway Bay (MI) | Garden | Oct-00 | Lansing, MI | 1987 | 288 | 2,106 | 6,559 | 3,370 | 2,106 | 9,929 | 12,035 | (4,603 | ) | 7,432 | 8,279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sandpiper Cove | Garden | Dec-97 | Boynton Beach, FL | 1987 | 416 | 3,511 | 21,396 | 6,662 | 3,511 | 28,058 | 31,569 | (9,887 | ) | 21,682 | 29,851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savannah Trace | Garden | Mar-01 | Shaumburg, IL | 1986 | 368 | 13,960 | 20,731 | 3,769 | 13,960 | 24,501 | 38,461 | (7,485 | ) | 30,976 | 21,976 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scandia | Garden | Oct-00 | Indianapolis, IN | 1977 | 444 | 10,540 | 9,852 | 11,225 | 10,540 | 21,078 | 31,618 | (9,307 | ) | 22,311 | 19,318 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scotchollow | Garden | Jan-06 | San Mateo, CA | 1971 | 418 | 49,474 | 17,756 | 3,807 | 49,474 | 21,564 | 71,038 | (835 | ) | 70,203 | 49,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scottsdale Gateway I | Garden | Oct-97 | Tempe, AZ | 1965 | 124 | 591 | 3,359 | 7,930 | 591 | 11,289 | 11,880 | (3,017 | ) | 8,863 | 5,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scottsdale Gateway II | Garden | Oct-97 | Tempe, AZ | 1976 | 487 | 2,458 | 13,927 | 21,490 | 2,458 | 35,416 | 37,874 | (11,879 | ) | 25,995 | 5,557 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shadow Creek (AZ) | Garden | May-98 | Mesa, AZ | 1984 | 266 | 2,016 | 11,886 | 3,549 | 2,016 | 15,435 | 17,451 | (6,947 | ) | 10,504 | 4,895 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shenandoah Crossing | Garden | Sep-00 | Fairfax, VA | 1984 | 640 | 18,492 | 57,197 | 6,957 | 18,492 | 64,154 | 82,646 | (24,753 | ) | 57,893 | 70,783 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sienna Bay | Garden | Apr-00 | St. Petersburg, FL | 1984 | 276 | 1,766 | 9,739 | 10,541 | 1,766 | 20,280 | 22,046 | (8,555 | ) | 13,491 | 10,799 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Signal Pointe | Garden | Oct-99 | Winter Park, FL | 1971 | 368 | 1,573 | 12,510 | 14,975 | 1,573 | 27,486 | 29,059 | (8,468 | ) | 20,591 | 18,596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Signature Point Apartments | Garden | Nov-96 | League City, TX | 1994 | 304 | 2,810 | 17,579 | 1,587 | 2,810 | 19,166 | 21,976 | (6,140 | ) | 15,836 | 11,336 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Somerset Lakes | Garden | May-99 | Indianapolis, IN | 1974 | 360 | 3,436 | 19,668 | 6,438 | 3,436 | 26,106 | 29,542 | (8,820 | ) | 20,722 | 18,142 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Springhouse (KY) | Garden | Mar-04 | Lexington, KY | 1986 | 224 | 1,843 | 7,161 | 1,109 | 1,843 | 8,270 | 10,113 | (2,969 | ) | 7,144 | 7,150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Springhouse at Newport | Garden | Jul-02 | Newport News, VA | 1986 | 432 | 9,479 | 11,425 | 3,223 | 9,479 | 14,648 | 24,127 | (3,490 | ) | 20,637 | 16,600 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Springwoods at Lake Ridge | Garden | Jul-02 | Lake Ridge, VA | 1984 | 180 | 5,587 | 7,284 | 1,104 | 5,587 | 8,388 | 13,975 | (1,530 | ) | 12,445 | 14,741 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spyglass at Cedar Cove | Garden | Sep-00 | Lexington Park, MD | 1985 | 152 | 3,241 | 5,094 | 2,436 | 3,241 | 7,530 | 10,771 | (2,885 | ) | 7,886 | 9,519 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stafford | High Rise | Oct-02 | Baltimore, MD | 1889 | 96 | 706 | 4,032 | 3,053 | 562 | 7,230 | 7,792 | (2,742 | ) | 5,050 | 4,372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steeplechase (MD) | Garden | Sep-00 | Largo, MD | 1986 | 240 | 3,675 | 16,111 | 2,890 | 3,675 | 19,001 | 22,676 | (6,176 | ) | 16,500 | 23,587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steeplechase (TX) | Garden | Jul-02 | Plano, TX | 1985 | 368 | 7,056 | 10,510 | 6,162 | 7,056 | 16,672 | 23,728 | (3,955 | ) | 19,773 | 13,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sterling Apartment Homes, The | Garden | Oct-99 | Philadelphia, PA | 1962 | 535 | 8,884 | 56,250 | 16,734 | 8,884 | 72,984 | 81,868 | (28,474 | ) | 53,394 | 78,988 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stone Creek Club | Garden | Sep-00 | Germantown, MD | 1984 | 240 | 13,593 | 9,347 | 2,740 | 13,593 | 12,086 | 25,679 | (6,093 | ) | 19,586 | 24,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stonebrook | Garden | Jun-97 | Sanford, FL | 1991 | 244 | 1,583 | 8,587 | 4,061 | 1,583 | 12,647 | 14,230 | (5,085 | ) | 9,145 | 5,207 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stonebrook II | Garden | Mar-99 | Sanford, FL | 1998 | 112 | 488 | 8,736 | 565 | 488 | 9,300 | 9,788 | (2,449 | ) | 7,339 | 3,101 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stoney Brook Apartments | Garden | Nov-96 | Houston, TX | 1972 | 113 | 275 | 1,865 | 1,781 | 275 | 3,646 | 3,921 | (1,078 | ) | 2,843 | 1,927 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summit Creek | Garden | May-98 | Austin, TX | 1985 | 164 | 1,211 | 6,037 | 1,784 | 1,211 | 7,822 | 9,033 | (2,876 | ) | 6,157 | 5,670 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sun Lake | Garden | May-98 | Lake Mary, FL | 1986 | 600 | 4,551 | 25,543 | 25,842 | 4,551 | 51,385 | 55,936 | (15,496 | ) | 40,440 | 36,294 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sun River Village | Garden | Oct-99 | Tempe ,AZ | 1981 | 334 | 2,091 | 14,056 | 3,453 | 2,091 | 17,509 | 19,600 | (8,281 | ) | 11,319 | 7,813 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Talbot Woods | Garden | Sep-04 | Middleboro, MA | 1972 | 121 | 5,852 | 4,719 | 1,972 | 5,852 | 6,691 | 12,543 | (1,547 | ) | 10,996 | 6,288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tamarac Village | Garden | Apr-00 | Denver, CO | 1979 | 564 | 4,021 | 23,495 | 7,625 | 4,316 | 30,825 | 35,141 | (14,527 | ) | 20,614 | 16,484 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tamarind Bay | Garden | Jan-00 | St. Petersburg, FL | 1980 | 200 | 766 | 7,090 | 4,812 | 766 | 11,902 | 12,668 | (4,969 | ) | 7,699 | 6,987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tar River Estates | Garden | Oct-99 | Greenville, NC | 1969 | 220 | 1,379 | 14,849 | 3,493 | 1,379 | 18,342 | 19,721 | (7,260 | ) | 12,461 | 4,159 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tatum Gardens | Garden | May-98 | Phoenix, AZ | 1985 | 128 | 1,323 | 7,155 | 1,783 | 1,323 | 8,938 | 10,261 | (4,265 | ) | 5,996 | 7,403 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tierra Palms | Garden | Jan-06 | Norwalk, CA | 1970 | 144 | 6,441 | 6,807 | 467 | 6,441 | 7,274 | 13,715 | (481 | ) | 13,234 | 13,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timbertree | Garden | Oct-97 | Phoenix, AZ | 1979 | 387 | 2,292 | 13,000 | 5,481 | 2,292 | 18,480 | 20,772 | (8,948 | ) | 11,824 | 4,927 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towers Of Westchester Park, The | High Rise | Jan-06 | College Park, MD | 1972 | 303 | 15,198 | 22,029 | 4,110 | 15,198 | 26,139 | 41,337 | (1,472 | ) | 39,865 | 31,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Township At Highlands | Town Home | Nov-96 | Littleton, CO | 1985 | 161 | 1,615 | 9,773 | 4,948 | 1,536 | 14,801 | 16,337 | (6,116 | ) | 10,221 | 16,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trails | Garden | Apr-02 | Nashville, TN | 1985 | 248 | 485 | 8,336 | 1,598 | 485 | 9,935 | 10,420 | (5,977 | ) | 4,443 | 8,440 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Twin Lake Towers | High Rise | Oct-99 | Westmont, IL | 1969 | 399 | 2,691 | 19,592 | 20,365 | 2,691 | 39,957 | 42,648 | (13,287 | ) | 29,361 | 9,737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Twin Lakes Apartments | Garden | Apr-00 | Palm Harbor, FL | 1986 | 262 | 2,034 | 12,878 | 4,243 | 2,034 | 17,122 | 19,156 | (6,618 | ) | 12,538 | 10,727 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vantage Pointe | Mid Rise | Aug-02 | Swampscott, MA | 1987 | 96 | 4,749 | 10,089 | 1,273 | 4,749 | 11,362 | 16,111 | (3,139 | ) | 12,972 | 7,769 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verandahs at Hunt Club | Garden | Jul-02 | Apopka, FL | 1985 | 210 | 2,271 | 7,724 | 2,298 | 2,271 | 10,022 | 12,293 | (2,052 | ) | 10,241 | 11,239 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Views at Vinings Mountain, The | Garden | Jan-06 | Atlanta, GA | 1983 | 180 | 610 | 5,026 | 11,897 | 610 | 16,924 | 17,534 | (5,425 | ) | 12,109 | 13,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Villa Del Sol | Garden | Mar-02 | Norwalk, CA | 1972 | 120 | 7,294 | 4,861 | 2,238 | 7,476 | 6,917 | 14,393 | (2,221 | ) | 12,172 | 13,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Creek at Brookhill | Garden | Jul-94 | Westminster, CO | 1987 | 324 | 2,446 | 13,261 | 4,607 | 2,446 | 17,868 | 20,314 | (8,425 | ) | 11,889 | 12,357 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Crossing | Garden | May-98 | W. Palm Beach, FL | 1986 | 189 | 1,618 | 9,757 | 2,874 | 1,618 | 12,631 | 14,249 | (4,948 | ) | 9,301 | 7,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Green Altamonte Springs | Garden | Oct-02 | Altamonte Springs, FL | 1970 | 164 | 608 | 6,618 | 2,201 | 608 | 8,819 | 9,427 | (3,934 | ) | 5,493 | 6,590 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Village in the Woods | Garden | Jan-00 | Cypress, TX | 1983 | 530 | 2,248 | 17,241 | 9,861 | 2,248 | 27,102 | 29,350 | (11,470 | ) | 17,880 | 19,637 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Village of Pennbrook | Garden | Oct-98 | Levittown, PA | 1969 | 722 | 5,800 | 43,710 | 12,256 | 5,800 | 55,966 | 61,766 | (20,111 | ) | 41,655 | 48,909 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Villages of Baymeadows | Garden | Oct-99 | Jacksonville, FL | 1972 | 904 | 5,006 | 33,960 | 52,905 | 5,006 | 86,865 | 91,871 | (33,317 | ) | 58,554 | 38,943 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Villas at Park La Brea, The | Garden | Mar-02 | Los Angeles, CA | 2002 | 250 | 8,621 | 48,871 | 3,289 | 8,630 | 52,150 | 60,780 | (10,531 | ) | 50,249 | 32,085 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vinings Peak | Garden | Jan-00 | Atlanta, GA | 1980 | 280 | 1,866 | 15,039 | 17,111 | 1,866 | 32,151 | 34,017 | (10,370 | ) | 23,647 | 6,855 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vista Del Lagos | Garden | Dec-97 | Chandler, AZ | 1986 | 200 | 804 | 4,952 | 2,443 | 804 | 7,394 | 8,198 | (3,117 | ) | 5,081 | 11,938 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waterford Village | Garden | Aug-02 | Bridgewater, MA | 1971 | 588 | 28,585 | 28,102 | 5,295 | 29,083 | 32,899 | 61,982 | (13,493 | ) | 48,489 | 30,156 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waterways Village | Garden | Jun-97 | Aventura, FL | 1991 | 180 | 4,504 | 11,064 | 3,495 | 4,504 | 14,559 | 19,063 | (5,842 | ) | 13,221 | 7,797 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waverly Apartments | Garden | Aug-08 | Brighton, MA | 1970 | 104 | 7,696 | 11,347 | — | 7,920 | 11,712 | 19,632 | (208 | ) | 19,424 | 12,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
West Winds | Garden | Oct-02 | Orlando, FL | 1985 | 272 | 1,892 | 11,913 | 2,741 | 1,892 | 14,654 | 16,546 | (4,090 | ) | 12,456 | 12,970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Westgate | Garden | Oct-99 | Houston, TX | 1971 | 313 | 1,920 | 11,224 | 4,617 | 1,920 | 15,841 | 17,761 | (5,838 | ) | 11,923 | 6,771 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Westway Village Apartments | Garden | May-98 | Houston, TX | 1979 | 326 | 2,921 | 11,384 | 2,663 | 2,921 | 14,047 | 16,968 | (6,122 | ) | 10,846 | 7,677 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wexford Village | Garden | Aug-02 | Worcester, MA | 1974 | 264 | 6,339 | 17,939 | 1,971 | 6,339 | 19,909 | 26,248 | (6,322 | ) | 19,926 | 14,542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wickertree | Garden | Oct-97 | Phoenix, AZ | 1983 | 226 | 1,225 | 6,923 | 2,603 | 1,225 | 9,526 | 10,751 | (3,919 | ) | 6,832 | 2,590 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Williamsburg Manor | Garden | Apr-00 | Cary, NC | 1972 | 183 | 1,669 | 8,971 | 1,912 | 1,669 | 10,883 | 12,552 | (5,120 | ) | 7,432 | 4,938 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Willow Bend (IL) | Garden | May-98 | Rolling Meadows, IL | 1985 | 328 | 2,717 | 15,437 | 22,680 | 2,717 | 38,117 | 40,834 | (10,023 | ) | 30,811 | 20,000 |
F-53
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
(2) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Initial Cost | Cost Capitalized | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date | Year | Number | Buildings and | Subsequent to | Buildings and | Accumulated | Total Cost Net of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Name | Type | Consolidated | Location | Built | of Units | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (AD) | AD | Encumbrances | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Willow Park on Lake Adelaide | Garden | Oct-99 | Altamonte Springs, FL | 1972 | 185 | 918 | 7,663 | 2,979 | 918 | 10,642 | 11,560 | (5,180 | ) | 6,380 | 6,887 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilson Acres | Garden | Apr-06 | Greenville, NC | 1979 | 146 | 1,175 | 3,943 | 799 | 1,485 | 4,432 | 5,917 | (513 | ) | 5,404 | 2,876 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Windemere | Garden | Jan-03 | Houston, TX | 1982 | 257 | 2,118 | 10,889 | 1,909 | 2,118 | 12,798 | 14,916 | (5,171 | ) | 9,745 | 4,697 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Windrift (CA) | Garden | Mar-01 | Oceanside, CA | 1987 | 404 | 24,960 | 17,590 | 18,162 | 24,960 | 35,753 | 60,713 | (12,088 | ) | 48,625 | 28,834 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Windrift (FL) | Garden | Oct-00 | Orlando, FL | 1987 | 288 | 3,696 | 10,029 | 4,776 | 3,696 | 14,805 | 18,501 | (5,006 | ) | 13,495 | 17,333 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Windsor Crossing | Garden | Mar-00 | Newport News, VA | 1978 | 156 | 307 | 2,110 | 1,865 | 131 | 4,150 | 4,281 | (1,863 | ) | 2,418 | 2,401 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Windsor Park | Garden | Mar-01 | Woodbridge, VA | 1987 | 220 | 4,279 | 15,970 | 2,093 | 4,279 | 18,063 | 22,342 | (5,663 | ) | 16,679 | 13,561 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Windward at the Villages | Garden | Oct-97 | W. Palm Beach, FL | 1988 | 196 | 1,595 | 9,079 | 3,722 | 1,595 | 12,802 | 14,397 | (4,299 | ) | 10,098 | 1,739 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodcreek | Garden | Oct-02 | Mesa, AZ | 1985 | 432 | 2,367 | 16,051 | 4,074 | 2,367 | 20,125 | 22,492 | (9,334 | ) | 13,158 | 19,716 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woods of Burnsville | Garden | Nov-04 | Burnsville, MN | 1984 | 400 | 2,622 | 19,457 | 2,182 | 2,622 | 21,639 | 24,261 | (6,635 | ) | 17,626 | 16,580 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woods of Inverness | Garden | Oct-99 | Houston, TX | 1983 | 272 | 1,427 | 11,698 | 2,900 | 1,427 | 14,598 | 16,025 | (6,974 | ) | 9,051 | 5,878 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woods Of Williamsburg | Garden | Jan-06 | Williamsburg, VA | 1976 | 125 | 430 | 4,024 | 742 | 430 | 4,766 | 5,196 | (3,069 | ) | 2,127 | 1,281 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodshire | Garden | Mar-00 | Virginia Beach, VA | 1972 | 288 | 961 | 5,549 | 3,367 | 961 | 8,916 | 9,877 | (3,475 | ) | 6,402 | 5,860 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yacht Club at Brickell | High Rise | Dec-03 | Miami, FL | 1998 | 357 | 31,363 | 32,214 | 3,031 | 31,363 | 35,245 | 66,608 | (4,705 | ) | 61,903 | 43,024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yorktown II Apartments | High Rise | Dec-99 | Lombard, IL | 1973 | 364 | 2,971 | 18,163 | 15,723 | 2,971 | 33,886 | 36,857 | (7,912 | ) | 28,945 | 13,991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Conventional Properties: | 91,044 | 2,154,058 | 4,751,342 | 2,382,924 | 2,212,328 | 7,076,598 | 9,288,926 | (2,259,323 | ) | 7,029,603 | 5,485,381 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Affordable Properties: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adams Court | Garden | Jan-06 | Hempstead, NY | 1981 | 84 | 95 | 6,046 | 514 | 95 | 6,561 | 6,656 | (3,833 | ) | 2,823 | 2,450 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Hallows | Garden | Jan-06 | San Francisco, CA | 1976 | 157 | 1,348 | 29,770 | 18,171 | 1,350 | 47,938 | 49,288 | (12,979 | ) | 36,309 | 20,654 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alliance Towers | High Rise | Mar-02 | Alliance, OH | 1971 | 101 | 530 | 1,934 | 747 | 530 | 2,681 | 3,211 | (644 | ) | 2,567 | 2,248 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arvada House | High Rise | Nov-04 | Arvada, CO | 1977 | 88 | 641 | 3,314 | 1,734 | 405 | 5,284 | 5,689 | (1,091 | ) | 4,598 | 4,185 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ashland Manor | High Rise | Mar-02 | Toledo, OH | 1977 | 189 | 205 | 455 | 343 | 205 | 798 | 1,003 | (523 | ) | 480 | 757 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baldwin Oaks | Mid Rise | Oct-99 | Parsippany ,NJ | 1980 | 251 | 746 | 8,516 | 1,819 | 746 | 10,335 | 11,081 | (5,816 | ) | 5,265 | 13,131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baldwin Towers | High Rise | Jan-06 | Pittsburgh, PA | 1983 | 99 | 237 | 5,417 | 163 | 237 | 5,580 | 5,817 | (3,681 | ) | 2,136 | 1,760 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bangor House | High Rise | Mar-02 | Bangor, ME | 1979 | 121 | 1,140 | 4,595 | 887 | 1,140 | 5,481 | 6,621 | (1,290 | ) | 5,331 | 2,645 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bannock Arms | Garden | Mar-02 | Boise, ID | 1978 | 66 | 275 | 1,139 | 497 | 275 | 1,636 | 1,911 | (485 | ) | 1,426 | 1,418 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bayview | Garden | Jun-05 | San Francisco, CA | 1976 | 146 | 1,023 | 15,265 | 16,165 | 574 | 31,879 | 32,453 | (6,131 | ) | 26,322 | 13,481 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beacon Hill | High Rise | Mar-02 | Hillsdale, MI | 1980 | 198 | 1,380 | 7,044 | 4,053 | 1,380 | 11,097 | 12,477 | (2,353 | ) | 10,124 | 4,873 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bedford House | Mid Rise | Mar-02 | Falmouth, KY | 1979 | 48 | 230 | 919 | 264 | 230 | 1,183 | 1,413 | (374 | ) | 1,039 | 1,088 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benjamin Banneker Plaza | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Chester, PA | 1976 | 70 | 79 | 3,862 | 595 | 79 | 4,457 | 4,536 | (2,652 | ) | 1,884 | 1,576 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Berger Apartments | Mid Rise | Mar-02 | New Haven, CT | 1981 | 144 | 1,152 | 4,657 | 1,582 | 1,152 | 6,238 | 7,390 | (1,847 | ) | 5,543 | 1,490 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biltmore Towers | High Rise | Mar-02 | Dayton, OH | 1980 | 230 | 1,813 | 6,411 | 13,075 | 1,813 | 19,486 | 21,299 | (7,089 | ) | 14,210 | 10,702 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blakewood | Garden | Oct-05 | Statesboro, GA | 1973 | 42 | 271 | 927 | 353 | 271 | 1,280 | 1,551 | (1,002 | ) | 549 | 719 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bloomsburg Towers | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Bloomsburg, PA | 1981 | 75 | 1 | 4,128 | 287 | 1 | 4,415 | 4,416 | (2,615 | ) | 1,801 | 1,571 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bolton North | High Rise | Jan-06 | Baltimore, MD | 1977 | 209 | 1,184 | 7,068 | 475 | 1,163 | 7,564 | 8,727 | (2,108 | ) | 6,619 | 2,638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightwood Manor | Garden | Jan-06 | New Brighton, PA | 1975 | 152 | 143 | 5,160 | 557 | 143 | 5,716 | 5,859 | (3,606 | ) | 2,253 | 1,501 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Burchwood | Garden | Oct-07 | Berea, KY | 1999 | 24 | 253 | 1,173 | 477 | 253 | 1,650 | 1,903 | (922 | ) | 981 | 981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Butternut Creek | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Charlotte, MI | 1980 | 100 | 505 | 3,617 | 3,510 | 505 | 7,127 | 7,632 | (1,371 | ) | 6,261 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cache Creek Apartment Homes | Mid Rise | Jun-04 | Clearlake, CA | 1986 | 80 | 1,545 | 9,405 | 531 | 1,545 | 9,936 | 11,481 | (2,934 | ) | 8,547 | 2,321 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
California Square I | High Rise | Jan-06 | Louisville, KY | 1982 | 101 | 154 | 5,704 | 517 | 154 | 6,221 | 6,375 | (3,367 | ) | 3,008 | 3,530 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Campbell Heights | High Rise | Oct-02 | Washington, D.C. | 1978 | 171 | 750 | 6,719 | 763 | 750 | 7,482 | 8,232 | (2,728 | ) | 5,504 | 7,654 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canterbury Towers | High Rise | Jan-06 | Worcester, MA | 1976 | 157 | 400 | 4,724 | 853 | 400 | 5,577 | 5,977 | (3,364 | ) | 2,613 | 4,611 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carriage House (VA) | Mid Rise | Dec-06 | Petersburg, VA | 1885 | 118 | 847 | 2,886 | 3,382 | 852 | 6,263 | 7,115 | (860 | ) | 6,255 | 2,466 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Casa de Las Hermanitas | Garden | Mar-02 | Los Angeles, CA | 1982 | 88 | 1,775 | 4,606 | 3,190 | 1,775 | 7,796 | 9,571 | (1,170 | ) | 8,401 | 5,431 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Castlewood | Garden | Mar-02 | Davenport, IA | 1980 | 96 | 585 | 2,351 | 1,348 | 585 | 3,699 | 4,284 | (1,217 | ) | 3,067 | 3,519 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cherry Ridge Terrace | Garden | Mar-02 | Northern Cambria, PA | 1983 | 62 | 372 | 1,490 | 844 | 372 | 2,333 | 2,705 | (715 | ) | 1,990 | 957 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cimarron | Garden | Oct-07 | Wichita, KS | 1973 | 132 | 1,558 | 1,536 | 1,538 | 1,558 | 3,073 | 4,631 | (2,034 | ) | 2,597 | 1,608 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
City Line | Garden | Mar-02 | Newport News, VA | 1976 | 200 | 500 | 2,014 | 6,995 | 500 | 9,009 | 9,509 | (777 | ) | 8,732 | 4,936 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clisby Towers | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Macon, GA | 1980 | 52 | 161 | 2,333 | 108 | 161 | 2,441 | 2,602 | (1,627 | ) | 975 | 992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Club, The | Garden | Jan-06 | Lexington, NC | 1972 | 87 | 66 | 2,560 | 601 | 66 | 3,162 | 3,228 | (1,794 | ) | 1,434 | 367 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coatesville Towers | High Rise | Mar-02 | Coatesville, PA | 1979 | 90 | 500 | 2,011 | 553 | 500 | 2,563 | 3,063 | (770 | ) | 2,293 | 2,155 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Spring Homes | Garden | Oct-07 | Cold Springs, KY | 2000 | 30 | 187 | 917 | 1,121 | 187 | 2,039 | 2,226 | (1,441 | ) | 785 | 790 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Community Circle II | Garden | Jan-06 | Cleveland, OH | 1975 | 129 | 213 | 4,749 | 476 | 213 | 5,225 | 5,438 | (3,050 | ) | 2,388 | 3,275 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copperwood I Apartments | Garden | Apr-06 | The Woodlands, TX | 1980 | 150 | 390 | 8,373 | 4,786 | 363 | 13,186 | 13,549 | (6,361 | ) | 7,188 | 5,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copperwood II Apartments | Garden | Oct-05 | The Woodlands, TX | 1981 | 150 | 452 | 5,552 | 3,319 | 459 | 8,865 | 9,324 | (2,360 | ) | 6,964 | 5,828 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country Club Heights | Garden | Mar-04 | Quincy, IL | 1976 | 200 | 676 | 5,715 | 4,803 | 675 | 10,518 | 11,193 | (3,192 | ) | 8,001 | 7,591 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country Commons | Garden | Jan-06 | Bensalem, PA | 1972 | 352 | 1,314 | 18,196 | 1,739 | 1,314 | 19,935 | 21,249 | (9,731 | ) | 11,518 | 5,453 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Courtyard | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Cincinnati, OH | 1980 | 137 | 642 | 5,597 | 266 | 642 | 5,863 | 6,505 | (2,941 | ) | 3,564 | 3,870 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Creekview | Garden | Mar-02 | Stroudsburg, PA | 1982 | 80 | 400 | 1,610 | 914 | 400 | 2,523 | 2,923 | (640 | ) | 2,283 | 2,670 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crevenna Oaks | Town Home | Jan-06 | Burke, VA | 1979 | 50 | 355 | 4,849 | — | 355 | 4,849 | 5,204 | (461 | ) | 4,743 | 3,171 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crockett Manor | Garden | Mar-04 | Trenton, TN | 1982 | 38 | 42 | 1,395 | 39 | 42 | 1,433 | 1,475 | (71 | ) | 1,404 | 978 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumberland Court | Garden | Jan-06 | Harrisburg, PA | 1975 | 108 | 176 | 4,242 | 542 | 176 | 4,784 | 4,960 | (3,075 | ) | 1,885 | 1,394 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daugette Tower | High Rise | Mar-02 | Gadsden, AL | 1979 | 100 | 540 | 2,178 | 1,300 | 540 | 3,478 | 4,018 | (1,168 | ) | 2,850 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delhaven Manor | Mid Rise | Mar-02 | Jackson, MS | 1983 | 104 | 575 | 2,304 | 1,779 | 575 | 4,083 | 4,658 | (1,298 | ) | 3,360 | 3,776 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denny Place | Garden | Mar-02 | North Hollywood, CA | 1984 | 17 | 394 | 1,579 | 132 | 394 | 1,711 | 2,105 | (415 | ) | 1,690 | 1,131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Douglas Landing | Garden | Oct-07 | Austin, TX | 1999 | 96 | 11 | 4,989 | — | 11 | 4,989 | 5,000 | — | 5,000 | 4,013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Echo Valley | Mid Rise | Mar-02 | West Warwick, RI | 1978 | 100 | 550 | 2,294 | 2,043 | 550 | 4,337 | 4,887 | (1,573 | ) | 3,314 | 4,164 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elmwood | Garden | Jan-06 | Athens, AL | 1981 | 80 | 185 | 2,804 | 277 | 185 | 3,081 | 3,266 | (1,558 | ) | 1,708 | 1,878 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairburn And Gordon II | Garden | Jan-06 | Atlanta, GA | 1969 | 58 | 86 | 2,000 | 168 | 86 | 2,168 | 2,254 | (1,379 | ) | 875 | 147 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairwood | Garden | Jan-06 | Carmichael, CA | 1979 | 86 | 166 | 5,275 | 260 | 166 | 5,535 | 5,701 | (3,299 | ) | 2,402 | 2,575 |
F-54
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
(2) | (3) | December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Initial Cost | Cost Capitalized | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date | Year | Number | Buildings and | Subsequent to | Buildings and | Accumulated | Total Cost Net of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Name | Type | Consolidated | Location | Built | of Units | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (AD) | AD | Encumbrances | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fountain Place | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Connersville, IN | 1980 | 102 | 440 | 2,091 | 2,519 | 447 | 4,603 | 5,050 | (291 | ) | 4,759 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fox Run (TX) | Garden | Mar-02 | Orange, TX | 1983 | 70 | 420 | 1,992 | 966 | 420 | 2,958 | 3,378 | (687 | ) | 2,691 | 2,575 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foxfire (MI) | Garden | Jan-06 | Jackson, MI | 1975 | 160 | 856 | 6,853 | 1,072 | 856 | 7,925 | 8,781 | (4,814 | ) | 3,967 | 1,995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Franklin Square School Apts | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Baltimore, MD | 1888 | 65 | 46 | 4,100 | 180 | 46 | 4,280 | 4,326 | (2,022 | ) | 2,304 | 2,164 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Friendset Apartments | High Rise | Jan-06 | Brooklyn, NY | 1979 | 259 | 550 | 16,825 | 1,613 | 550 | 18,437 | 18,987 | (9,807 | ) | 9,180 | 14,700 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Friendship Arms | Mid Rise | Mar-02 | Hyattsville, MD | 1979 | 151 | 970 | 3,887 | 1,631 | 970 | 5,518 | 6,488 | (1,736 | ) | 4,752 | 4,647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frio | Garden | Jan-06 | Pearsall, TX | 1980 | 63 | 109 | 2,425 | 358 | 109 | 2,783 | 2,892 | (1,588 | ) | 1,304 | 1,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gates Manor | Garden | Mar-04 | Clinton, TN | 1981 | 80 | 266 | 2,225 | 777 | 266 | 3,002 | 3,268 | (1,033 | ) | 2,235 | 2,421 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gateway Village | Garden | Mar-04 | Hillsborough, NC | 1980 | 64 | 433 | 1,666 | 572 | 444 | 2,227 | 2,671 | (467 | ) | 2,204 | 2,377 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Glendale Terrace | Garden | Jan-06 | Aiken, SC | 1972 | 60 | 41 | 1,552 | 157 | 41 | 1,708 | 1,749 | (1,194 | ) | 555 | 146 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Glens, The | Garden | Jan-06 | Rock Hill, SC | 1982 | 88 | 93 | 4,882 | 845 | 93 | 5,727 | 5,820 | (3,337 | ) | 2,483 | 3,886 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greenbriar | Garden | Jan-06 | Indianapolis, IN | 1980 | 121 | 812 | 3,272 | 308 | 812 | 3,580 | 4,392 | (2,394 | ) | 1,998 | 1,228 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hamlin Estates | Garden | Mar-02 | North Hollywood, CA | 1983 | 30 | 1,010 | 1,691 | 230 | 1,010 | 1,921 | 2,931 | (498 | ) | 2,433 | 1,621 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hanover Square | High Rise | Jan-06 | Baltimore, MD | 1980 | 199 | 369 | 10,862 | 340 | 369 | 11,201 | 11,570 | (5,934 | ) | 5,636 | 5,780 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harris Park Apartments | Garden | Dec-97 | Rochester, NY | 1968 | 114 | 475 | 2,786 | 1,049 | 475 | 3,835 | 4,310 | (1,689 | ) | 2,621 | 345 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hatillo Housing | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Hatillo, PR | 1982 | 64 | 184 | 2,893 | 159 | 184 | 3,053 | 3,237 | (1,706 | ) | 1,531 | 1,381 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hemet Estates | Garden | Mar-02 | Hemet, CA | 1983 | 80 | 700 | 2,802 | 2,997 | 1,263 | 5,235 | 6,498 | (926 | ) | 5,572 | 4,328 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Henna Townhomes | Garden | Oct-07 | Round Rock, TX | 1999 | 160 | 1,047 | 12,893 | — | 1,047 | 12,893 | 13,940 | (2,641 | ) | 11,299 | 6,201 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heritage House | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Lewisburg, PA | 1982 | 80 | 178 | 3,251 | 109 | 178 | 3,360 | 3,538 | (1,930 | ) | 1,608 | 2,106 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hickory Heights | Garden | Jan-06 | Abbeville, SC | 1974 | 80 | 27 | 2,477 | 697 | 27 | 3,174 | 3,201 | (1,698 | ) | 1,503 | 357 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Highlawn Place | High Rise | Mar-02 | Huntington, WV | 1977 | 133 | 550 | 2,204 | 1,091 | 550 | 3,296 | 3,846 | (800 | ) | 3,046 | 1,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hillside Village | Town Home | Jan-06 | Catawissa, PA | 1981 | 50 | 31 | 2,643 | 132 | 31 | 2,775 | 2,806 | (1,643 | ) | 1,163 | 1,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hilltop | Garden | Jan-06 | Duquesne, PA | 1975 | 152 | 166 | 7,298 | 539 | 166 | 7,837 | 8,003 | (4,959 | ) | 3,044 | 2,234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hopkins Village | Mid Rise | Sep-03 | Baltimore, MD | 1979 | 165 | 438 | 5,973 | — | 438 | 5,973 | 6,411 | (744 | ) | 5,667 | 9,100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hudson Gardens | Garden | Mar-02 | Pasadena, CA | 1983 | 41 | 914 | 1,548 | 272 | 914 | 1,820 | 2,734 | (507 | ) | 2,227 | 659 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hudson Terrace | Garden | Jan-06 | Hudson, NY | 1973 | 168 | 248 | 5,424 | 494 | 248 | 5,917 | 6,165 | (3,574 | ) | 2,591 | 1,198 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indio Gardens | Mid Rise | Oct-06 | Indio, CA | 1980 | 151 | — | 9,534 | 4,135 | — | 13,669 | 13,669 | (544 | ) | 13,125 | 4,368 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ingram Square | Garden | Jan-06 | San Antonio, TX | 1980 | 120 | 630 | 3,137 | — | 630 | 3,137 | 3,767 | (782 | ) | 2,985 | 3,275 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jenny Lind Hall | High Rise | Mar-04 | Springfield, MO | 1977 | 78 | 142 | 3,684 | 238 | 142 | 3,922 | 4,064 | (303 | ) | 3,761 | 1,028 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JFK Towers | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Durham, NC | 1983 | 177 | 335 | 8,386 | 607 | 335 | 8,993 | 9,328 | (4,342 | ) | 4,986 | 5,854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kephart Plaza | High Rise | Jan-06 | Lock Haven, PA | 1978 | 101 | 52 | 4,353 | 417 | 52 | 4,770 | 4,822 | (2,815 | ) | 2,007 | 1,592 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
King Bell Apartments | Garden | Jan-06 | Milwaukie, OR | 1982 | 62 | 204 | 2,497 | 154 | 204 | 2,651 | 2,855 | (1,352 | ) | 1,503 | 1,661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kirkwood House | High Rise | Sep-04 | Baltimore, MD | 1979 | 262 | 1,281 | 9,358 | — | 1,281 | 9,358 | 10,639 | (1,167 | ) | 9,472 | 16,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kubasek Trinity Manor (The Hollows) | High Rise | Jan-06 | Yonkers, NY | 1981 | 130 | 54 | 8,308 | 1,748 | 54 | 10,055 | 10,109 | (4,706 | ) | 5,403 | 4,823 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
La Salle | Garden | Oct-00 | San Francisco, CA | 1976 | 145 | 1,841 | 19,568 | 16,634 | 1,839 | 36,203 | 38,042 | (9,102 | ) | 28,940 | 15,462 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lafayette Commons | Garden | Mar-04 | West Lafayette, OH | 1979 | 49 | 166 | 512 | 271 | 166 | 783 | 949 | (105 | ) | 844 | 843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lafayette Square | Garden | Jan-06 | Camden, SC | 1978 | 72 | 69 | 1,948 | 65 | 69 | 2,013 | 2,082 | (1,590 | ) | 492 | 303 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lakeview Arms | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Poughkeepsie, NY | 1981 | 72 | 111 | 3,256 | 254 | 111 | 3,511 | 3,622 | (2,048 | ) | 1,574 | 1,872 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Landau | Garden | Oct-05 | Clinton, SC | 1970 | 80 | 1,088 | 1,635 | 198 | 1,088 | 1,833 | 2,921 | (1,779 | ) | 1,142 | 335 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Laurelwood | Garden | Jan-06 | Morristown, TN | 1981 | 65 | 75 | 1,870 | 110 | 75 | 1,980 | 2,055 | (1,195 | ) | 860 | 1,320 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lavista | Garden | Jan-06 | Concord, CA | 1981 | 75 | 565 | 4,448 | 3,522 | 567 | 7,968 | 8,535 | (398 | ) | 8,137 | 5,545 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lock Haven Gardens | Garden | Jan-06 | Lock Haven, PA | 1979 | 150 | 169 | 7,040 | 471 | 169 | 7,511 | 7,680 | (4,312 | ) | 3,368 | 3,092 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Locust House | High Rise | Mar-02 | Westminster, MD | 1979 | 99 | 650 | 2,604 | 735 | 650 | 3,339 | 3,989 | (998 | ) | 2,991 | 2,433 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lodge Run | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Portage, PA | 1983 | 31 | 18 | 1,467 | 364 | 18 | 1,831 | 1,849 | (1,167 | ) | 682 | 443 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Meadow | Garden | Jan-06 | Cheraw, SC | 1973 | 56 | 30 | 1,470 | 124 | 30 | 1,594 | 1,624 | (1,103 | ) | 521 | 230 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loring Towers (MN) | High Rise | Oct-02 | Minneapolis, MN | 1975 | 230 | 1,297 | 7,445 | 7,554 | 886 | 15,410 | 16,296 | (3,607 | ) | 12,689 | 7,683 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loring Towers Apartments | High Rise | Sep-03 | Salem, MA | 1973 | 250 | 129 | 14,050 | 5,520 | 140 | 19,560 | 19,700 | (2,608 | ) | 17,092 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lynnhaven | Garden | Mar-04 | Durham, NC | 1980 | 75 | 539 | 2,159 | 703 | 543 | 2,859 | 3,402 | (601 | ) | 2,801 | 2,814 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michigan Beach | Garden | Oct-07 | Chicago, IL | 1958 | 239 | 2,225 | 10,797 | 341 | 2,225 | 11,138 | 13,363 | (2,603 | ) | 10,760 | 5,550 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midview Crossing | Garden | Mar-02 | Elyria, OH | 1970 | 138 | 200 | — | 2,120 | 200 | 2,120 | 2,320 | (1,115 | ) | 1,205 | 589 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mill Pond | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Taunton, MA | 1982 | 49 | 80 | 2,704 | 287 | 80 | 2,991 | 3,071 | (1,505 | ) | 1,566 | 1,524 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miramar Housing | High Rise | Jan-06 | Ponce, PR | 1983 | 96 | 290 | 5,162 | 156 | 290 | 5,318 | 5,608 | (2,813 | ) | 2,795 | 2,960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Montblanc Gardens | Town Home | Dec-03 | Yauco, PR | 1982 | 128 | 391 | 3,859 | 879 | 391 | 4,738 | 5,129 | (2,298 | ) | 2,831 | 3,311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Morrisania II | High Rise | Jan-06 | Bronx, NY | 1979 | 203 | 404 | 16,038 | 1,367 | 404 | 17,404 | 17,808 | (10,100 | ) | 7,708 | 8,207 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Moss Gardens | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Lafayette, LA | 1980 | 114 | 125 | 4,218 | 117 | 125 | 4,335 | 4,460 | (2,983 | ) | 1,477 | 2,057 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Baltimore | Mid Rise | Mar-02 | New Baltimore, MI | 1980 | 101 | 888 | 2,360 | 5,380 | 896 | 7,732 | 8,628 | (1,013 | ) | 7,615 | 2,244 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Vistas I | Garden | Jan-06 | Chicago, IL | 1925 | 148 | 200 | 7,368 | 374 | 200 | 7,742 | 7,942 | (5,411 | ) | 2,531 | 1,560 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newberry Park | Garden | Dec-97 | Chicago, IL | 1985 | 84 | 1,150 | 7,862 | 423 | 1,150 | 8,285 | 9,435 | (2,505 | ) | 6,930 | 7,496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northlake Village | Garden | Oct-00 | Lima, OH | 1971 | 150 | 487 | 1,317 | 1,716 | 487 | 3,033 | 3,520 | (1,486 | ) | 2,034 | 752 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northpoint | Garden | Jan-00 | Chicago, IL | 1921 | 304 | 2,280 | 14,334 | 15,486 | 2,510 | 29,589 | 32,099 | (12,009 | ) | 20,090 | 20,021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northwinds, The | Garden | Mar-02 | Wytheville, VA | 1978 | 144 | 500 | 2,012 | 476 | 500 | 2,489 | 2,989 | (1,032 | ) | 1,957 | 1,723 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakbrook | Garden | Jan-08 | Topeka, KS | 1979 | 170 | 240 | 6,200 | — | 240 | 6,200 | 6,440 | (2,773 | ) | 3,667 | 2,770 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakwood Manor | Garden | Mar-04 | Milan, TN | 1984 | 34 | 95 | 498 | 27 | 95 | 525 | 620 | (105 | ) | 515 | 433 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ocala Place | Garden | Jan-06 | Ocala, FL | 1980 | 40 | 96 | 1,417 | 288 | 96 | 1,705 | 1,801 | (981 | ) | 820 | 569 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Olde Towne West I | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Alexandria, VA | 1976 | 172 | 337 | 5,457 | 2,454 | 337 | 7,911 | 8,248 | (4,253 | ) | 3,995 | 8,035 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Olde Towne West II | Garden | Oct-02 | Alexandria, VA | 1977 | 72 | 214 | 2,865 | 624 | 214 | 3,488 | 3,702 | (1,725 | ) | 1,977 | 2,522 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Olde Towne West III | Garden | Apr-00 | Alexandria, VA | 1978 | 75 | 581 | 3,463 | 1,732 | 581 | 5,194 | 5,775 | (1,911 | ) | 3,864 | 3,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
O’Neil | High Rise | Jan-06 | Troy, NY | 1978 | 115 | 88 | 4,067 | 695 | 88 | 4,762 | 4,850 | (3,118 | ) | 1,732 | 1,454 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange Village | Garden | Jan-06 | Hermitage, PA | 1979 | 81 | 53 | 3,432 | 311 | 53 | 3,743 | 3,796 | (2,223 | ) | 1,573 | 1,850 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overbrook Park | Garden | Jan-06 | Chillicothe, OH | 1981 | 50 | 109 | 2,309 | 120 | 109 | 2,429 | 2,538 | (1,293 | ) | 1,245 | 1,462 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oxford House | Mid Rise | Mar-02 | Deactur, IL | 1979 | 156 | 993 | 4,164 | 429 | 993 | 4,593 | 5,586 | (1,615 | ) | 3,971 | 3,145 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oxford Terrace IV | Town Home | Oct-07 | Indianapolis, IN | 1994 | 48 | 247 | 1,410 | 607 | 247 | 2,016 | 2,263 | (1,057 | ) | 1,206 | 1,261 |
F-55
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
(2) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Initial Cost | Cost Capitalized | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date | Year | Number | Buildings and | Subsequent to | Buildings and | Accumulated | Total Cost Net of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Name | Type | Consolidated | Location | Built | of Units | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (AD) | AD | Encumbrances | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Palm Springs Senior | Garden | Mar-02 | Palm Springs, CA | 1981 | 116 | — | 8,745 | 3,003 | — | 11,748 | 11,748 | (1,526 | ) | 10,222 | 7,277 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panorama Park | Garden | Mar-02 | Bakersfield, CA | 1982 | 66 | 621 | 5,520 | — | 621 | 5,520 | 6,141 | (854 | ) | 5,287 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parc Chateau I | Garden | Jan-06 | Lithonia, GA | 1973 | 86 | 124 | 1,910 | 168 | 124 | 2,078 | 2,202 | (2,078 | ) | 124 | 504 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parc Chateau II | Garden | Jan-06 | Lithonia, GA | 1974 | 88 | 169 | 3,392 | 155 | 169 | 3,547 | 3,716 | (2,421 | ) | 1,295 | 507 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Park — Joplin Apartments | Garden | Oct-07 | Joplin, MO | 1974 | 192 | 996 | 8,847 | — | 996 | 8,847 | 9,843 | (2,816 | ) | 7,027 | 3,431 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Park Apts, The | Garden | Oct-07 | Overland Park, KS | 1984 | 280 | 365 | 8,723 | 4,001 | 365 | 12,724 | 13,089 | (5,029 | ) | 8,060 | 5,050 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Park Place | Mid Rise | Jun-05 | St Louis, MO | 1977 | 242 | 742 | 6,327 | 9,719 | 705 | 16,084 | 16,789 | (5,834 | ) | 10,955 | 9,713 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Park Vista | Garden | Oct-05 | Anaheim, CA | 1958 | 392 | 6,155 | 25,929 | 4,090 | 6,155 | 30,019 | 36,174 | (7,812 | ) | 28,362 | 37,851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parkview | Garden | Mar-02 | Sacramento, CA | 1980 | 97 | 1,041 | 2,880 | 8,111 | 1,097 | 10,936 | 12,033 | (2,781 | ) | 9,252 | 6,938 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parkways, The | Garden | Jun-04 | Chicago, IL | 1925 | 446 | 3,684 | 23,257 | 17,218 | 3,427 | 40,733 | 44,160 | (9,406 | ) | 34,754 | 22,608 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patman Switch | Garden | Jan-06 | Hughes Springs, TX | 1978 | 82 | 202 | 1,906 | 570 | 202 | 2,477 | 2,679 | (1,473 | ) | 1,206 | 1,229 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pavillion | High Rise | Mar-04 | Philadelphia, PA | 1976 | 296 | — | 15,416 | 1,128 | — | 16,543 | 16,543 | (3,265 | ) | 13,278 | 9,405 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peachwood Place | Garden | Oct-07 | Waycross, GA | 1999 | 72 | 163 | 2,893 | — | 163 | 2,893 | 3,056 | (1,317 | ) | 1,739 | 737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinebluff Village | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Salisbury, MD | 1980 | 151 | 354 | 7,935 | 496 | 354 | 8,431 | 8,785 | (5,431 | ) | 3,354 | 2,196 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinewood Place | Garden | Mar-02 | Toledo, OH | 1979 | 99 | 420 | 1,698 | 1,048 | 420 | 2,746 | 3,166 | (1,050 | ) | 2,116 | 2,009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pleasant Hills | Garden | Apr-05 | Austin, TX | 1982 | 100 | 1,188 | 2,631 | 3,496 | 1,229 | 6,085 | 7,314 | (1,398 | ) | 5,916 | 3,240 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plummer Village | Mid Rise | Mar-02 | North Hills, CA | 1983 | 75 | 624 | 2,647 | 1,587 | 667 | 4,191 | 4,858 | (1,377 | ) | 3,481 | 2,634 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portner Place | Town Home | Jan-06 | Washington, DC | 1980 | 48 | 601 | 6,100 | 67 | 601 | 6,167 | 6,768 | (2,383 | ) | 4,385 | 1,346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post Street Apartments | High Rise | Jan-06 | Yonkers, NY | 1930 | 56 | 148 | 3,315 | 367 | 148 | 3,682 | 3,830 | (2,165 | ) | 1,665 | 1,673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pride Gardens | Garden | Dec-97 | Flora, MS | 1975 | 76 | 102 | 1,071 | 1,573 | 102 | 2,644 | 2,746 | (1,329 | ) | 1,417 | 1,094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quivira Place | Garden | Oct-07 | Lenexa, KS | 1978 | 289 | 374 | 12,158 | — | 374 | 12,158 | 12,532 | (6,941 | ) | 5,591 | 6,125 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rancho California | Garden | Jan-06 | Temecula, CA | 1984 | 55 | 399 | 5,550 | 231 | 399 | 5,781 | 6,180 | (2,560 | ) | 3,620 | 4,589 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ridgewood (La Loma) | Garden | Mar-02 | Sacramento, CA | 1980 | 75 | 684 | 227 | 6,225 | 683 | 6,454 | 7,137 | (874 | ) | 6,263 | 4,277 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ridgewood Towers | High Rise | Mar-02 | East Moline, IL | 1977 | 140 | 698 | 2,803 | 585 | 698 | 3,388 | 4,086 | (1,158 | ) | 2,928 | 1,677 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
River Village | High Rise | Jan-06 | Flint, MI | 1980 | 340 | 1,756 | 13,877 | 928 | 1,756 | 14,805 | 16,561 | (9,145 | ) | 7,416 | 7,777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
River’s Edge | Town Home | Jan-06 | Greenville, MI | 1983 | 49 | 206 | 2,202 | 224 | 205 | 2,426 | 2,631 | (1,557 | ) | 1,074 | 788 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Riverwoods | High Rise | Jan-06 | Kankakee, IL | 1983 | 125 | 590 | 4,932 | 2,749 | 597 | 7,673 | 8,270 | (819 | ) | 7,451 | 5,576 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rosedale Court Apartments | Garden | Mar-04 | Dawson Springs, KY | 1981 | 40 | 194 | 1,177 | 170 | 194 | 1,347 | 1,541 | (493 | ) | 1,048 | 891 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Round Barn | Garden | Mar-02 | Champaign, IL | 1979 | 156 | 947 | 5,134 | 5,627 | 934 | 10,774 | 11,708 | (2,049 | ) | 9,659 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rutherford Park | Town Home | Jan-06 | Hummelstown, PA | 1981 | 85 | 376 | 4,814 | 206 | 376 | 5,019 | 5,395 | (2,825 | ) | 2,570 | 2,865 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Jose Apartments | Garden | Sep-05 | San Antonio, TX | 1970 | 220 | 404 | 5,770 | 11,344 | 238 | 17,279 | 17,517 | (2,092 | ) | 15,425 | 5,464 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Juan Del Centro | Mid Rise | Sep-05 | Boulder, CO | 1971 | 150 | 243 | 7,110 | 12,522 | 438 | 19,437 | 19,875 | (2,403 | ) | 17,472 | 12,218 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sandy Hill Terrace | High Rise | Mar-02 | Norristown, PA | 1980 | 175 | 1,650 | 6,599 | 2,842 | 1,650 | 9,441 | 11,091 | (2,287 | ) | 8,804 | 3,829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sandy Springs | Garden | Mar-05 | Macon, GA | 1979 | 74 | 153 | 1,736 | 1,358 | 153 | 3,094 | 3,247 | (1,527 | ) | 1,720 | 1,935 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
School Street | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Taunton, MA | 1920 | 75 | 219 | 4,335 | 561 | 219 | 4,896 | 5,115 | (2,581 | ) | 2,534 | 3,080 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sharp-Leadenhall I | Town Home | Mar-04 | Baltimore, MD | 1981 | 155 | 1,445 | 5,484 | 919 | 1,445 | 6,403 | 7,848 | (1,829 | ) | 6,019 | 5,414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sharp-Leadenhall II | Town Home | Sep-03 | Baltimore, MD | 1981 | 37 | 171 | 1,636 | 330 | 171 | 1,966 | 2,137 | (972 | ) | 1,165 | 1,073 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sherman Hills | High Rise | Jan-06 | Wilkes-Barre, PA | 1976 | 344 | 1,137 | 16,451 | 875 | 1,137 | 17,326 | 18,463 | (13,083 | ) | 5,380 | 3,348 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shoreview | Garden | Oct-99 | San Francisco, CA | 1976 | 156 | 1,498 | 19,071 | 17,002 | 1,498 | 36,072 | 37,570 | (9,804 | ) | 27,766 | 16,703 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
South Bay Villa | Garden | Mar-02 | Los Angeles, CA | 1981 | 80 | 663 | 2,770 | 4,231 | 659 | 7,004 | 7,663 | (2,512 | ) | 5,151 | 3,105 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spring Manor | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Holidaysburg, PA | 1983 | 51 | 117 | 2,574 | 388 | 117 | 2,962 | 3,079 | (2,047 | ) | 1,032 | 773 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Springfield Villas | Garden | Oct-07 | Lockhart, TX | 1999 | 32 | — | 1,153 | — | — | 1,153 | 1,153 | — | 1,153 | 860 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St. George Villas | Garden | Jan-06 | St. George, SC | 1984 | 40 | 86 | 1,025 | 90 | 86 | 1,115 | 1,201 | (749 | ) | 452 | 526 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sterling Village | Town Home | Mar-02 | San Bernadino, CA | 1983 | 80 | 549 | 3,459 | 2,793 | 1,246 | 5,555 | 6,801 | (1,155 | ) | 5,646 | 4,393 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stonegate Village | Garden | Oct-00 | New Castle, IN | 1970 | 122 | 313 | 1,895 | 1,209 | 308 | 3,110 | 3,418 | (1,091 | ) | 2,327 | 386 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strawbridge Square | Garden | Oct-99 | Alexandria, VA | 1979 | 128 | 662 | 3,508 | 3,142 | 662 | 6,650 | 7,312 | (2,354 | ) | 4,958 | 6,624 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sumler Terrace | Garden | Jan-06 | Norfolk, VA | 1976 | 126 | 215 | 4,400 | 319 | 215 | 4,719 | 4,934 | (3,446 | ) | 1,488 | 1,406 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summit Oaks | Town Home | Jan-06 | Burke, VA | 1980 | 50 | 382 | 4,930 | — | 382 | 4,930 | 5,312 | (710 | ) | 4,602 | 3,094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suntree | Garden | Jan-06 | St. Johns, MI | 1980 | 121 | 403 | 6,488 | 468 | 403 | 6,955 | 7,358 | (4,155 | ) | 3,203 | 1,358 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tabor Towers | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Lewisburg, WV | 1979 | 84 | 155 | 3,369 | 196 | 155 | 3,564 | 3,719 | (2,008 | ) | 1,711 | 1,986 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tamarac Apartments I | Garden | Nov-04 | Woodlands, TX | 1980 | 144 | 140 | 2,775 | 3,479 | 363 | 6,030 | 6,393 | (1,642 | ) | 4,751 | 4,254 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tamarac Apartments II | Garden | Nov-04 | Woodlands, TX | 1980 | 156 | 142 | 3,195 | 3,874 | 266 | 6,944 | 7,210 | (1,859 | ) | 5,351 | 4,609 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Terraces | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Kettering, OH | 1979 | 102 | 521 | 3,855 | 416 | 521 | 4,271 | 4,792 | (2,374 | ) | 2,418 | 2,491 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Terry Manor | Mid Rise | Oct-05 | Los Angeles, CA | 1977 | 170 | 1,775 | 5,848 | 6,631 | 1,996 | 12,258 | 14,254 | (2,947 | ) | 11,307 | 7,057 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tompkins Terrace | Garden | Oct-02 | Beacon, NY | 1974 | 193 | 872 | 6,827 | 11,211 | 872 | 18,038 | 18,910 | (1,962 | ) | 16,948 | 8,837 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trestletree Village | Garden | Mar-02 | Atlanta, GA | 1981 | 188 | 1,150 | 4,655 | 1,177 | 1,150 | 5,832 | 6,982 | (1,867 | ) | 5,115 | 3,509 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
University Square | High Rise | Mar-05 | Philadelphia, PA | 1978 | 442 | 702 | 22,040 | 11,195 | 702 | 33,235 | 33,937 | (16,426 | ) | 17,511 | 13,778 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Van Nuys Apartments | High Rise | Mar-02 | Los Angeles, CA | 1981 | 299 | 4,253 | 21,226 | 3,988 | 4,253 | 25,214 | 29,467 | (4,121 | ) | 25,346 | 20,531 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Victory Square | Garden | Mar-02 | Canton, OH | 1975 | 81 | 215 | 889 | 449 | 215 | 1,338 | 1,553 | (533 | ) | 1,020 | 867 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Village Oaks | Mid Rise | Jan-06 | Catonsville, MD | 1980 | 181 | 1,187 | 6,128 | 1,722 | 1,187 | 7,850 | 9,037 | (4,484 | ) | 4,553 | 4,693 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Village of Kaufman | Garden | Mar-05 | Kaufman, TX | 1981 | 68 | 370 | 1,606 | 571 | 370 | 2,177 | 2,547 | (610 | ) | 1,937 | 1,858 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage Crossing | Town Home | Mar-04 | Cuthbert, GA | 1982 | 50 | 188 | 1,058 | 533 | 188 | 1,591 | 1,779 | (774 | ) | 1,005 | 1,655 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vista Park Chino | Garden | Mar-02 | Chino, CA | 1983 | 40 | 380 | 1,521 | 361 | 380 | 1,883 | 2,263 | (611 | ) | 1,652 | 1,505 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vistula Heritage Village | Garden | Oct-08 | Toledo, OH | 1930 | 250 | 261 | 15,091 | — | 261 | 15,091 | 15,352 | (3,495 | ) | 11,857 | 12,814 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wah Luck House | High Rise | Jan-06 | Washington, DC | 1982 | 153 | 1,001 | 11,874 | 416 | 1,001 | 12,290 | 13,291 | (6,265 | ) | 7,026 | 9,653 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walnut Hills | High Rise | Jan-06 | Cincinnati, OH | 1983 | 198 | 888 | 5,608 | 4,962 | 888 | 10,569 | 11,457 | (973 | ) | 10,484 | 6,194 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wasco Arms | Garden | Mar-02 | Wasco, CA | 1982 | 78 | 625 | 2,519 | 947 | 625 | 3,466 | 4,091 | (1,165 | ) | 2,926 | 3,115 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Square West | Mid Rise | Sep-04 | Philadelphia, PA | 1982 | 132 | 555 | 11,169 | 5,691 | 582 | 16,832 | 17,414 | (5,764 | ) | 11,650 | 3,943 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Westminster Oaks | Town Home | Jan-06 | Springfield, VA | 1982 | 50 | — | 3,517 | 351 | — | 3,868 | 3,868 | (2,026 | ) | 1,842 | 828 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Westwood Terrace | Mid Rise | Mar-02 | Moline, IL | 1976 | 97 | 720 | 3,242 | 401 | 720 | 3,643 | 4,363 | (897 | ) | 3,466 | 1,806 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
White Cliff | Garden | Mar-02 | Lincoln Heights, OH | 1977 | 72 | 215 | 938 | 398 | 215 | 1,336 | 1,551 | (491 | ) | 1,060 | 1,008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Whitefield Place | Garden | Apr-05 | San Antonio, TX | 1980 | 80 | 223 | 3,151 | 2,598 | 219 | 5,753 | 5,972 | (1,634 | ) | 4,338 | 2,291 |
F-56
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2008
(In Thousands Except Unit Data)
(2) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Initial Cost | Cost Capitalized | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date | Year | Number | Buildings and | Subsequent to | Buildings and | Accumulated | Total Cost Net of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Name | Type | Consolidated | Location | Built | of Units | Land | Improvements | Acquisition | Land | Improvements | Total | Depreciation (AD) | AD | Encumbrances | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wickford | Garden | Mar-04 | Henderson, NC | 1983 | 44 | 247 | 946 | 117 | 247 | 1,062 | 1,309 | (387 | ) | 922 | 686 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilderness Trail | High Rise | Mar-02 | Pineville, KY | 1983 | 124 | 1,010 | 4,048 | 633 | 1,010 | 4,680 | 5,690 | (1,053 | ) | 4,637 | 4,546 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilkes Towers | High Rise | Mar-02 | North Wilkesboro, NC | 1981 | 72 | 410 | 1,680 | 466 | 410 | 2,146 | 2,556 | (587 | ) | 1,969 | 1,880 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Willowwood | Garden | Mar-02 | North Hollywood, CA | 1984 | 19 | 1,051 | 840 | 185 | 1,051 | 1,025 | 2,076 | (264 | ) | 1,812 | 1,079 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Winnsboro Arms | Garden | Jan-06 | Winnsboro, SC | 1978 | 60 | 80 | 1,889 | 181 | 80 | 2,070 | 2,150 | (1,451 | ) | 699 | 246 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Winter Gardens | High Rise | Mar-04 | St Louis, MO | 1920 | 112 | 300 | 3,072 | 4,419 | 300 | 7,492 | 7,792 | (1,097 | ) | 6,695 | 3,856 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodcrest | Garden | Dec-97 | Odessa, TX | 1972 | 80 | 41 | 229 | 573 | 41 | 802 | 843 | (629 | ) | 214 | 444 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodland | Garden | Jan-06 | Spartanburg, SC | 1972 | 100 | 182 | 663 | 1,324 | 182 | 1,987 | 2,169 | (381 | ) | 1,788 | 186 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodland Hills | Garden | Oct-05 | Jackson, MI | 1980 | 125 | 541 | 3,875 | 4,243 | 321 | 8,339 | 8,660 | (1,874 | ) | 6,786 | 3,689 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Affordable Properties: | 25,007 | 117,542 | 1,056,684 | 418,638 | 118,171 | 1,474,674 | 1,592,845 | (520,566 | ) | 1,072,279 | 795,759 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (4) | — | 929 | 2,472 | (80 | ) | 1,958 | 1,363 | 3,321 | (2,330 | ) | 991 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
116,051 | 2,272,529 | 5,810,498 | 2,801,482 | 2,332,457 | 8,552,635 | 10,885,092 | (2,782,219 | ) | 8,102,873 | 6,281,140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Date we acquired the property or first consolidated the partnership which owns the property. | |
(2) | Initial cost includes the tendering costs to acquire the minority interest share of our consolidated real estate partnerships. | |
(3) | Costs capitalized subsequent to acquisition includes costs capitalized since acquisition or first consolidation of the partnership/property. | |
(4) | Other includes land parcels and commercial properties. |
F-57
Table of Contents
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(In Thousands)
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(In Thousands)
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Real Estate | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 10,248,274 | $ | 9,426,924 | $ | 7,978,988 | ||||||
Additions during the year: | ||||||||||||
Newly consolidated assets and acquisition of limited partnership interests (1) | 17,557 | 32,080 | 1,146,086 | |||||||||
Acquisitions | 107,445 | 233,059 | 184,986 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures | 665,233 | 689,719 | 485,758 | |||||||||
Deductions during the year: | ||||||||||||
Casualty and other write-offs (2) | (114,678 | ) | (24,016 | ) | (21,192 | ) | ||||||
Assets held for sale reclassification (3) | (38,739 | ) | (109,492 | ) | (347,702 | ) | ||||||
Balance at end of year | $ | 10,885,092 | $ | 10,248,274 | $ | 9,426,924 | ||||||
Accumulated Depreciation | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 2,360,727 | $ | 2,101,202 | $ | 1,432,181 | ||||||
Additions during the year: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation | 497,395 | 477,725 | 468,186 | |||||||||
Newly consolidated assets and acquisition of limited partnership interests (1) | (7,733 | ) | (115,465 | ) | 452,824 | |||||||
Deductions during the year: | ||||||||||||
Casualty and other write-offs | (1,865 | ) | (5,280 | ) | (5,604 | ) | ||||||
Assets held for sale reclassification (3) | (66,305 | ) | (97,455 | ) | (246,385 | ) | ||||||
Balance at end of year | $ | 2,782,219 | $ | 2,360,727 | $ | 2,101,202 | ||||||
(1) | Includes the effect of newly consolidated assets, acquisition of limited partnership interests and related activity. As discussed in Note 2, during 2006, we adopted EITF 04-5, which resulted in the consolidation, at historical carrying amounts, of 156 partnerships owning 149 properties. As discussed in Note 3, during 2007, we acquired seven properties from VMS, a consolidated partnership in which we held a 22% interest. We allocated the excess of the consideration exchanged over the carrying amount of the minority interest in these properties to real estate, which resulted in an increase in real estate primarily due to a reduction in the historical accumulated depreciation on these assets. | |
(2) | Casualty and other write offs in 2008 includes impairments totaling $91.1 million related to our Lincoln Place and Pacific Bay Vistas properties. | |
(3) | Represents activity on properties that have been sold or classified as held for sale that is included in the line items above. |
F-58
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS (1) (2)
EXHIBIT NO. | DESCRIPTION | |||
10.1 | Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties, L.P., dated as of July 29, 1994, as amended and restated as of February 28, 2007 (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.2 | First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties, L.P., dated as of December 31, 2007 (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 31, 2007, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.3 | Amended and Restated Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2004, by and among Aimco, AIMCO Properties, L.P., AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., and NHP Management Company as the borrowers and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association, and the Lenders listed therein (Exhibit 4.1 to Aimco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.4 | First Amendment to Amended and Restated Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2005, by and among Aimco, AIMCO Properties, L.P., AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., and NHP Management Company as the borrowers and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association, and the Lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.5 | Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2006, by and among Aimco, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., as the borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association, and the lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 10-K, dated March 22, 2006, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.6 | Third Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2007, by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 31, 2007, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.7 | Fourth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2007, by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 14, 2007, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.8 | Fifth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2008, by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 11, 2008, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.9 | Master Indemnification Agreement, dated December 3, 2001, by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., XYZ Holdings LLC, and the other parties signatory thereto (Exhibit 2.3 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 6, 2001, is incorporated herein by this reference) |
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT NO. | DESCRIPTION | |||
10.10 | Tax Indemnification and Contest Agreement, dated December 3, 2001, by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, National Partnership Investments, Corp., and XYZ Holdings LLC and the other parties signatory thereto (Exhibit 2.4 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 6, 2001, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.11 | Limited Liability Company Agreement of AIMCO JV Portfolio #1, LLC dated as of December 30, 2003 by and among AIMCO BRE I, LLC, AIMCO BRE II, LLC and SRV-AJVP#1, LLC (Exhibit 10.54 to Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, is incorporated herein by this reference) | |||
10.12 | Employment Contract executed on December 29, 2008, by and between AIMCO Properties, L.P. and Terry Considine (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 29, 2008, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.13 | Apartment Investment and Management Company 1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (October 1999) (Exhibit 10.26 to Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.14 | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan) (Exhibit 10.11 to Aimco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1997, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.15 | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan) (Exhibit 10.42 to Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.16 | 2007 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Aimco’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2007)* | |||
10.17 | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Exhibit 10.2 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 30, 2007, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.18 | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.3 to Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 30, 2007, is incorporated herein by this reference)* | |||
10.19 | 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to Aimco’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2007)* | |||
21.1 | List of Subsidiaries | |||
23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||
32.1 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||
32.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||
99.1 | Agreement re: disclosure of long-term debt instruments |
(1) | Schedule and supplemental materials to the exhibits have been omitted but will be provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. | |
(2) | The file reference number for all exhibits is 001-13232, and all such exhibits remain available pursuant to the Records Control Schedule of the Securities and Exchange Commission. | |
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |