Atel Cash Distribution Fund Vi (XXAAY) 10-Q 2009 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from             to            

Commission File number 000-28368

ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California	94-3207229
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)	(I. R. S. Employer Identification No.)

600 California Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, California 94108-2733

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (415) 989-8800

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Partnership Units

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨ Accelerated filer  ¨ Non-accelerated filer  ¨ Smaller reporting company  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of Limited Partnership Units outstanding as of July 31, 2009 was 12,478,676.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

Index

Part I.	Financial Information	3
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
	Balance Sheets, June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	3
	Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	4
	Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the six months ended June 30, 2009	5
	Statements of Cash Flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	6
	Notes to the Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	17
Part II.	Other Information	18
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	18
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	18
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	18
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	18
Item 5.	Other Information	18
Item 6.	Exhibits	18

2

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited).

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

BALANCE SHEETS

JUNE 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,485	$	664
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 at June 30, 2009 and $16 at December 31, 2008		304		301
Prepaid expenses		1		6
Investments in equipment and leases, net of accumulated depreciation of $20,657 at June 30, 2009 and $21,608 at December 31, 2008		6,077		6,840
Total assets	$	7,867	$	7,811
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
General Partner	$	25	$	42
Lessees and other		300		312
Unearned operating lease income		29		15
Total liabilities		354		369
Commitments and contingencies
Partners’ capital:
General Partner		—		—
Limited Partners		7,513		7,442
Total Partners’ capital		7,513		7,442
Total liabilities and Partners’ capital	$	7,867	$	7,811

See accompanying notes.

3

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

(In Thousands Except Units and Per Unit Data)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Revenues:
Leasing activities:
Operating leases	$	691		$	893		$	1,388		$	1,776
Direct financing leases		7			10			15			20
(Loss) gain on sales of assets		(17	)		39			72			82
Interest income		—			7			—			17
Other revenue		—			—			1			1
Total revenues		681			949			1,476			1,896
Expenses:
Depreciation of operating lease assets		291			338			588			653
Cost reimbursements to General Partner		148			132			294			275
Railcar maintenance		171			158			333			311
Equipment and incentive management fees to General Partner		20			39			39			82
Taxes on income and franchise fees		4			1			8			1
Other management fees		26			32			45			72
Professional fees		10			32			36			101
Outside services		18			27			42			49
Reversal of provision for doubtful accounts		—			(1	)		(16	)		(1	)
Other		25			74			36			90
Total expenses		713			832			1,405			1,633
Net (loss) income	$	(32	)	$	117		$	71		$	263
Net (loss) income
General Partner	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	19
Limited Partners		(32	)		117			71			244
	$	(32	)	$	117		$	71		$	263
Net income per Limited Liability Partnership Unit	$	0.00		$	0.01		$	0.01		$	0.02
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		12,478,676			12,478,676			12,478,676			12,478,676

See accompanying notes.

4

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS

ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

(In Thousands Except Units and Per Unit Data)

(Unaudited)

	Limited Partners				General Partner
	Units	Amount						Total
Balance December 31, 2007	12,478,676	$	11,059		$	—		$	11,059
Distributions to Limited Partners ($0.34 per Unit)	—		(4,182	)		—			(4,182	)
Distributions to General Partner	—		—			(42	)		(42	)
Net income	—		565			42			607
Balance December 31, 2008	12,478,676		7,442			—			7,442
Net income	—		71			—			71
Balance June 30, 2009	12,478,676	$	7,513		$	—		$	7,513

See accompanying notes.

5

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(32	)	$	117		$	71		$	263
Adjustment to reconcile net (loss) income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation of operating lease assets		291			338			588			653
Amortization of unearned income on direct finance leases		(7	)		(10	)		(15	)		(20	)
Reversal of provision for doubtful accounts		—			(1	)		(16	)		(1	)
Loss (gain) on sales of assets		17			(39	)		(72	)		(82	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(19	)		145			13			370
Prepaid expenses		2			13			5			16
Accounts payable and accruals due General Partner		(26	)		(64	)		(17	)		(7	)
Accounts payable and accruals due lessees and other		(19	)		(23	)		(12	)		(42	)
Unearned operating lease income		(13	)		(7	)		14			4
Net cash provided by operating activities		194			469			559			1,154
Investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of lease assets		55			82			227			183
Payments received on direct finance leases		18			18			35			35
Net cash provided by investing activities		73			100			262			218
Financing activities:
Distributions to Limited Partners		—			—			—			(1,873	)
Distributions to General Partner		—			—			—			(19	)
Net cash used in financing activities		—			—			—			(1,892	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		267			569			821			(520	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,218			1,356			664			2,445
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,485		$	1,925		$	1,485		$	1,925
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for taxes	$	16		$	16		$	16		$	16

See accompanying notes.

6

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and partnership matters:

ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the “Partnership”) was formed under the laws of the State of California on June 29, 1994 for the purpose of engaging in the sale of limited liability investment units and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities, primarily in the United States. The Partnership may continue until December 31, 2015. The General Partner of the Partnership is ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”). Prior to converting to a limited liability company structure, AFS was formerly known as ATEL Financial Corporation.

The Partnership conducted a public offering of 12,500,000 Limited Partnership Units (“Units”), at a price of $10 per Unit. Upon the sale of the minimum amount of Units of $1.2 million and the receipt of the proceeds thereof on January 3, 1995, the Partnership commenced operations in its primary business (acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities). On November 23, 1996, subscriptions for 12,500,000 ($125 million) Limited Partnership Units had been received, in addition to the Initial Limited Partners’ Units, and the offering terminated. As of June 30, 2009, 12,478,676 Units were issued and outstanding.

The Partnership’s principal objectives have been to invest in a diversified portfolio of equipment that (i) preserves, protects and returns the Partnership’s invested capital; (ii) generates regular distributions to the partners of cash from operations and cash from sales or refinancing, with any balance remaining after certain minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional equipment during the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), which ended December 31, 2002 and (iii) provides additional distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all equipment has been sold. The Partnership is governed by its Limited Partnership Agreement (“Partnership Agreement”).

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, AFS receives compensation and reimbursements for services rendered on behalf of the Partnership (Note 4). The Partnership is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of AFS.

As of June 30, 2009, the Partnership is in the liquidation phase of its life cycle as defined in the Partnership Agreement and is making distributions on an annual basis or at the discretion of the General Partner.

These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. The unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the General Partner, necessary for a fair statement of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2009.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on equity or net income.

Footnote and tabular amounts are presented in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data.

7

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued):

Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Segment reporting:

The Partnership adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 131 “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” SFAS No. 131 establishes annual and interim standards for operating segments of a Partnership. It also requires entity-wide disclosures about the products and services an entity provides, the material countries in which it holds assets and reports revenue, and its major customers. The Partnership is not organized by multiple operating segments for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Partnership operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States.

Certain of the Partnership’s lessee customers may have international operations. In these instances, the Partnership is aware that certain equipment, primarily rail and transportation, may periodically exit the country. However, these lessee customers are US-based, and it is impractical for the Partnership to track, on an asset-by-asset, day-by-day basis, where these assets are deployed.

The primary geographic regions in which the Partnership sought leasing opportunities were North America and Europe. Currently, 100% of the Partnership’s operating revenues are from customers domiciled in North America.

Per Unit data:

Net income (loss) and distributions per Unit are based upon the weighted average number of Limited Partners’ Units outstanding during the period.

Recent accounting pronouncements:

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. The Codification will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This statement is not intended to change existing GAAP and as such will not have an impact on the financial statements of the Partnership.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The Partnership adopted SFAS 165 for its second quarter 2009 interim reporting period. The adoption of SFAS 165 did not have a significant impact on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See Note 8.

8

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued):

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” which provides guidance on determining fair value when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. FSP No. 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and has been adopted by the Partnership for its second quarter 2009 interim reporting period. The adoption of FSP No. 157-4 had no impact on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“the FSP”). The FSP requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments whenever summarized financial information for interim reporting periods is presented. Entities shall disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments and shall describe changes in methods and significant assumptions, if any, during the period. The FSP is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Partnership adopted the provisions of the FSP for its second quarter 2009 interim reporting period without significant effect on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R replaces SFAS 141 and establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141R will impact the Partnership only if it elects to enter into a business combination subsequent to December 31, 2008.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). This standard clarifies the definition of fair value for financial reporting, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about the use of fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 were to be effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-2, which defers the effective date of SFAS 157 as it pertains to fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. On January 1, 2008, the Partnership adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 except as it applies to its investment in equipment and leases, and other nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities as noted in FSP No. 157-2. The deferred provisions of SFAS 157 were implemented effective January 1, 2009 without significant effect on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

3. Investment in equipment and leases, net:

The Partnership’s Investments in equipment and leases consists of the following (in thousands):

	Balance December 31, 2008		Reclassifications & Additions / Dispositions			Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases			Balance June 30, 2009
Net investment in operating leases	$	6,247	$	(153	)	$	(583	)	$	5,511
Net investment in direct financing leases		119		—			(20	)		99
Assets held for sale or lease, net		474		(2	)		(5	)		467
Total	$	6,840	$	(155	)	$	(608	)	$	6,077

9

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3. Investment in equipment and leases, net (continued):

Impairment of investments in leases and assets held for sale or lease:

Management periodically reviews the carrying values of its assets on leases and assets held for lease or sale. No assets were identified as impaired during management’s review for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Depreciation expense on property subject to operating leases and property held for lease or sale was $291 thousand and $338 thousand for the respective three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and was $588 thousand and $653 thousand for the respective six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

All of the equipment on leases was acquired in the years from 1994 through 1997.

Net investment in operating leases:

Property on operating leases consists of the following (in thousands):

	Balance December 31, 2008			Additions			Reclassifications or Dispositions			Balance June 30, 2009
Transportation, rail	$	24,527		$	—		$	(1,659	)	$	22,868
Materials handling		1,401			—			—			1,401
Transportation, other		285			—			—			285
		26,213			—			(1,659	)		24,554
Less accumulated depreciation		(19,966	)		(583	)		1,506			(19,043	)
Total	$	6,247		$	(583	)	$	(153	)	$	5,511

The average estimated residual value for assets on operating leases was 17% of the assets’ original cost at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

The Partnership earns revenues from certain lease assets based on utilization of such assets. Such contingent rentals and the associated expenses are recorded when earned and/or incurred. The revenues associated with these rentals are included as a component of Operating Lease Revenues, and totaled $127 thousand and $153 thousand for the respective three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008; and $270 thousand and $311 thousand for the respective six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

Net investment in direct financing leases:

Investment in direct financing leases consists of various transportation and ground support equipment. The following lists the components of the Partnership’s investment in direct financing leases as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Total minimum lease payments receivable	$	103		$	138
Estimated residual values of leased equipment (unguaranteed)		21			21
Investment in direct financing leases		124			159
Less unearned income		(25	)		(40	)
Net investment in direct financing leases	$	99		$	119

There were no investment in direct financing leases, net in nonaccrual status as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

10

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3. Investment in equipment and leases, net (continued):

At June 30, 2009, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments under operating and direct financing leases are as follows (in thousands):

	Operating Leases		Direct Financing Leases		Total
Six months ending December 31, 2009	$	946	$	34	$	980
Year ending December 31, 2010		1,543		69		1,612
2011		1,082		—		1,082
2012		237		—		237
	$	3,808	$	103	$	3,911

The Partnership utilizes a straight-line depreciation method for equipment in all of the categories currently in its portfolio of lease transactions. The useful lives for investment in leases by category are as follows (in years):

Equipment category	Useful Life
Transportation, rail	30 - 35
Materials handling	7 - 10
Transportation, other	7 - 10

4. Related party transactions:

The terms of the Partnership Agreement provide that AFS and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees for equipment acquisition, management and resale and for management of the Partnership.

The Partnership Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by AFS in providing administrative services to the Partnership. Administrative services provided include Partnership accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and lease and equipment documentation. AFS is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as acquisition and disposition of equipment. Reimbursable costs incurred by AFS are allocated to the Partnership based upon actual time incurred by employees working on Partnership business and an allocation of rent and other costs based on utilization studies. The Partnership is contingently liable for certain future costs to be incurred by AFS to manage the administrative services provided to the Partnership.

Each of ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) and AFS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group and performs services for the Partnership. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations, communications and general administrative services are performed by AFS.

Cost reimbursements to the General Partner are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Partnership. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as total assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred.

Incentive management fees are computed as 4% of distributions of cash from operations, as defined in the Partnership Agreement. Equipment management fees are computed as 3.5% of gross revenues from operating leases, as defined in the Partnership Agreement plus 2% of gross revenues from full payout leases, as defined in the Partnership Agreement.

11

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. Related party transactions (continued):

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, AFS and/or affiliates earned fees, commissions and reimbursements, pursuant to the Limited Partnership Agreement, as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Cost reimbursements to General Partner	$	148	$	132	$	294	$	275
Equipment and incentive management fees to General Partner		20		39		39		82
	$	168	$	171	$	333	$	357

5. Guarantees:

The Partnership enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Partnership’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Partnership has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

The General Partner knows of no facts or circumstances that would make the Partnership’s contractual commitments outside standard mutual covenants applicable to commercial transactions between businesses. Accordingly, the Partnership believes that these indemnification obligations are made in the ordinary course of business as part of standard commercial and industry practice, and that any potential liability under the Partnership’s similar commitments is remote. Should any such indemnification obligation become payable, the Partnership would separately record and/or disclose such liability in accordance with GAAP.

6. Partners’ Capital:

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 12,478,676 Units were issued and outstanding. The Partnership was authorized to issue up to 12,500,000 Units, in addition to the 50 Units issued to the Initial Limited Partners, as defined.

As defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, the Partnership’s Net Income, Net Losses, and Tax Credits are to be allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to AFS. The Limited Partnership Agreement allows the Partnership to make an allocation of income to AFS in order to maintain the capital account of AFS at zero. In accordance with the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement, additional allocations of income were made to AFS in 2008. The amounts allocated were determined so as to bring AFS’s ending capital account balance to zero at the end of each year.

As defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, available Cash from Operations and Cash from Sales and Refinancing are to be distributed as follows:

Cash from Operations

Cash from Operations is distributed 95% to the Limited Partners, 1% to AFS and 4% to an affiliate of AFS as an Incentive Management Fee.

Cash from Sales and Refinancing

First, 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to AFS until each Limited Partner has received Aggregate Distributions in an amount equal to their Original Invested Capital, as defined, plus a 10% per annum cumulative (compounded daily) return on their Adjusted Invested Capital; and

Thereafter, 95% to the Limited Partners, 1% to AFS and 4% to an affiliate of AFS as an Incentive Management Fee.

12

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6. Partners’ Capital (continued):

Distributions to the Limited Partners were as follows (in thousands except units and per unit data):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Distributions declared	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,873
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		12,478,676		12,478,676		12,478,676		12,478,676
Weighted average distributions per Unit	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	0.15

7. Fair value of financial instruments:

On January 1, 2008, the Partnership adopted SFAS 157, except as it applies to the nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities subject to FSP No. 157-2 and FSP No. FAS 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13.” The Partnership implemented the deferred provisions of SFAS 157 on January 1, 2009. SFAS 157 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The three levels of inputs within the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in the market.

Level 3 – Valuation is modeled using significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. These unobservable inputs reflect the Partnership’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Partnership had no financial assets or liabilities that require measurement on a recurring or non-recurring basis under SFAS 157.

The Partnership has determined the estimated fair value amounts by using market information and valuation methodologies that it considers appropriate consistent with SFAS 157. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Partnership could realize or has realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Alternatively, disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“SFAS 107”). Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for the Partnership’s financial instruments, are made solely to comply with the requirements of SFAS No. 107 and should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s financial statements and related notes.

At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the only financial instrument reflected on the Partnership’s financial statements is its cash and cash equivalents. Such cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the liquidity and short-term maturity of these instruments.

8. Subsequent events:

The Partnership has evaluated events subsequent to June 30, 2009 through August 12, 2009. No events were noted which would require disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements.

13

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Statements contained in this Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” (“MD&A”) and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. In particular, the economic recession and changes in general economic conditions, including, fluctuations in demand for equipment, lease rates, and interest rates, may result in delays in leasing, re-leasing, and disposition of equipment, and reduced returns on invested capital. The Partnership’s performance is subject to risks relating to lessee defaults and the creditworthiness of its lessees. The Partnership’s performance is also subject to risks relating to the value of its equipment at the end of its leases, which may be affected by the condition of the equipment, technological obsolescence and the markets for new and used equipment at the end of lease terms. Investors are cautioned not to attribute undue certainty to these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

Overview

ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a California partnership that was formed in June 1994 for the purpose of engaging in the sale of limited liability investment units and acquiring equipment to generate revenues from equipment leasing and sales activities, primarily in the United States. The General Partner of the Partnership is ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”), a California limited liability company.

The Partnership conducted a public offering of 12,500,000 Limited Partnership Units (“Units”), at a price of $10 per Unit. The offering was terminated in November 1996. During early 1997, the Partnership completed its initial acquisition stage with the investment of the net proceeds from the public offering of Units. Subsequently, throughout the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), the Partnership reinvested cash flow in excess of certain amounts required to be distributed to the Limited Partners and/or utilized its credit facilities to acquire additional equipment.

The Partnership may continue until December 31, 2015. Pursuant to the guidelines of the Limited Partnership Agreement (“Partnership Agreement”), the Partnership began to liquidate its assets and distribute the proceeds thereof after the end of the Reinvestment Period which ended in December 2002.

As of June 30, 2009, the Partnership remains in its liquidation phase. Accordingly, assets that mature will be returned to inventory and most likely will be subsequently sold, which will result in decreasing revenue as earning assets decrease. The Partnership continues to generally make distributions on an annual basis or at the discretion of the General Partner.

Results of Operations

The three months ended June 30, 2009 versus the three months ended June 30, 2008

The Partnership had a net loss of $32 thousand for the second quarter of 2009 compared to net income of $117 thousand for the second quarter of 2008. The results for the second quarter of 2009 reflect a decrease in total revenues offset, in part, by a decline in operating expenses when compared to the prior year period.

Revenues

Total revenues for the second quarter of 2009 decreased by $268 thousand, or 28%, as compared to the prior year period. The decline was primarily due to a $202 thousand reduction in operating lease revenues and a $56 thousand decrease in gains on sales of lease assets.

The reduction in operating lease revenues was primarily due to continued run-off and disposition of lease assets; and the decrease in gains on sales of lease assets was attributable to reduced demand for railcars, containers and other assets as a result of the continued economic downturn.

14

Expenses

Total expenses for the second quarter of 2009 decreased by $119 thousand, or 14%, as compared to the prior year period. The net decline in expenses was primarily due to reductions in other expense, depreciation expense, professional fees and management fees paid to AFS offset, in part, by increases in cost reimbursements to AFS and railcar maintenance.

Other expense declined by $49 thousand primarily due to a second quarter 2008 payment of a $52 thousand property tax assessment offset, in part, by a period over period increase in printing and postage expenses related to mailings of investor information. Similarly, depreciation expense and management fees paid to AFS declined by $47 thousand and $19 thousand, respectively, largely due to the continued runoff of the Partnership’s lease assets during its liquidation phase. In addition, professional fees declined by $22 thousand primarily resulting from a period over period reduction in audit related fees and tax preparation fees.

Partially offsetting the aforementioned decreases in expenses were increases in costs reimbursed to AFS and railcar maintenance expense totaling $16 thousand and $13 thousand, respectively. The increase in costs reimbursed to AFS was attributable to a period over period increase in administrative costs; and the increase in maintenance expense was largely attributable to the overall increase in labor and other maintenance costs.

The six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the six months ended June 30, 2008

The Partnership had net income of $71 thousand and $263 thousand for the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The results for the first six months of 2009 reflect a decrease in total revenues offset, in part, by a decline in operating expenses when compared to the prior year period.

Revenues

Total revenues for the first six months of 2009 decreased by $420 thousand, or 22%, as compared to the prior year period. The net decrease was primarily due to a $388 thousand reduction in operating lease revenues coupled with a $17 thousand decrease in interest income.

The reduction in operating lease revenues was primarily due to continued run-off and disposition of lease assets; and the decline in interest income was attributable to the period over period decrease in the Partnership’s interest earning cash balances and the lower interest rate environment.

Expenses

Total expenses for the first six months of 2009 decreased by $228 thousand, or 14%, as compared to the prior year period. The net decline in expenses was primarily due to reductions in professional fees, depreciation expense, management fees paid to AFS, other expense, other management fees and the provision for doubtful accounts offset, in part, by increases in railcar maintenance expense and costs reimbursed to AFS.

Professional fees declined by $65 thousand primarily as a result of a period over period reduction in audit related fees and tax preparation fees. Depreciation expense also declined by $65 thousand while management fees paid to AFS decreased by $43 thousand. Both decreases were largely due to continued runoff of the Partnership’s lease assets during its liquidation phase. Similarly, other expense decreased by $54 thousand mostly due to the payment of a $52 thousand property tax assessment during the second quarter of 2008, coupled with decreased bank charges. These decreases were offset, in part, by a period over period increase in printing and postage expenses related to mailings of marketing and investor information.

In addition, other management fees paid to a third party railcar manager declined by $27 thousand largely due to continued runoff of the Partnership’s railcars; and the provision for doubtful accounts decreased by $15 thousand as a result of payments received on previously reserved delinquent invoices.

Partially offsetting the above decreases in expenses were increases in railcar maintenance expense and cost reimbursements to AFS totaling $22 thousand and $19 thousand, respectively. The increase in maintenance expense was largely due to aging of the Partnership’s railcars and increased labor and other maintenance costs; and the increase in costs reimbursed to AFS was attributable to increased administrative costs.

15

Capital Resources and Liquidity

The liquidity of the Partnership varies, increasing to the extent cash flows from leases and proceeds of asset sales exceed expenses and decreasing as distributions are made to the Limited Partners and to the extent expenses exceed cash flows from leases and proceeds from asset sales.

The primary source of liquidity for the Partnership has been its cash flow from leasing activities. As the initial lease terms have expired, the Partnership ventured to re-lease or sell the equipment. Future liquidity will depend on the Partnership’s success in remarketing or selling the equipment as it comes off rental.

The changes in the Partnership’s cash flow for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 when compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 are as follows:

The three months ended June 30, 2009 versus the three months ended June 30, 2008

• Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities decreased by $275 thousand, or 59%, for the second quarter of 2009 as compared to the prior year period. The net decrease in cash flow was primarily attributable to a $164 thousand reduction in payments received on accounts receivable and a $136 thousand decline in net operating results, as adjusted for non-cash revenue and expense items such as gain on sales of assets and depreciation expense.

The period over period decrease in payments received on accounts receivable was mainly due to the collection of aged receivables during the second quarter of 2008; and the decline in net operating results, as adjusted for non-cash items, was largely a result of the continued decline in operating lease revenues, which is consistent with a fund in liquidation.

• Investing Activities

Cash provided by investing activities decreased by $27 thousand, or 27%, for the second quarter of 2009 as compared to the prior year period. The decrease in cash flow was mainly due to a period over period decline in proceeds from sales of lease assets as the current economic downturn has adversely impacted demand for the Partnership’s lease assets available for sale.

• Financing Activities

The Partnership had no financing activities during the second quarters of 2009 and 2008.

The six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the six months ended June 30, 2008

• Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities decreased by $595 thousand, or 52%, for the first half of 2009 as compared to the prior year period. The net decrease in cash flow was primarily attributable to a $357 thousand reduction in payments received on accounts receivable and a $257 thousand decline in net operating results, as adjusted for non-cash revenue and expense items such as gain on sales of assets and depreciation expense.

The period over period decrease in payments received on accounts receivable was mainly due to the receipt of a $150 thousand tax refund from the city of Philadelphia and the collection of aged receivables during the first half of 2008; and the decline in net operating results, as adjusted for non-cash items, was largely a result of the continued decline in operating lease revenues, which is consistent with a fund in liquidation.

• Investing Activities

Cash provided by investing activities increased by $44 thousand, or 20%, for the first six months of 2009 as compared to the prior year period. The net improvement in cash flow was mainly due to a period over period increase in proceeds from sales of lease assets resulting from increased sales of railcars and containers.

16

• Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $1.9 million, or 100%, for the first six months of 2009 as compared to the prior year period primarily due to the timing of payments of distributions to the Limited Partners. The annual distribution for 2007 was paid during the first half of 2008.

In a normal economy, if inflation in the general economy becomes significant, it may affect the Partnership in as much as the residual (resale) values and rates on re-leases of the Partnership’s leased assets may increase as the costs of similar assets increase. However, the Partnership’s revenues from existing leases would not increase as such rates are generally fixed for the terms of the leases without adjustment for inflation. In addition, if interest rates increase significantly under such circumstances, the lease rates that the Partnership can obtain on future leases will be expected to increase as the cost of capital is a significant factor in the pricing of lease financing. Leases already in place, for the most part, would not be affected by changes in interest rates.

The Partnership currently has available adequate reserves to meet its immediate cash requirements and those of the next twelve months, but in the event those reserves were found to be inadequate, the Partnership would likely be in a position to borrow against its current portfolio to meet such requirements. AFS envisions no such requirements for operating purposes.

The Partnership commenced periodic distributions, based on cash flows from operations, beginning with the month of January 1995. At June 30, 2009, the Partnership had no commitments to purchase leased assets and pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership will no longer purchase any new leased assets.

Item 4T. Controls and procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The Partnership’s General Partner’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (“Management”), evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures, Management concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Partnership does not control the financial reporting process, and is solely dependent on the Management of the General Partner, which is responsible for providing the Partnership with financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The General Partner’s disclosure controls and procedures, as it is applicable to the Partnership, were effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Changes in internal control

There were no changes in the General Partner’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Partnership, during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the General Partner’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Partnership.

17

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

In the ordinary course of conducting business, there may be certain claims, suits, and complaints filed against the Partnership. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such matters, if any, will not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security Holders.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Documents filed as a part of this report:

1. Financial Statement Schedules

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable, and therefore have been omitted.

2. Other Exhibits

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification of Dean L. Cash
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi
32.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Dean L. Cash
32.2	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Paritosh K. Choksi

18

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 12, 2009

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.

(Registrant)

By: ATEL Financial Services, LLC General Partner of Registrant

By:	/s/ Dean L. Cash
	Dean L. Cash,
	President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)
By:	/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
	Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)
By:	/s/ Samuel Schussler
	Samuel Schussler, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

19