Note 6. Segment Information (continued)
Certain of the comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted at June 27, 2004.
On July 19, 2004 the Company announced its intention to exit the Chassis Segment, conducted at its Cordele, Georgia facility. The Company is currently evaluating alternatives to exit the business, including sale. A reasonable estimate of the financial impact of this event cannot be made at this time.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
---|
Of Results of Operations and Financial Position |
---|
For the Three Months Ended June 27, 2004 |
All amounts in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Position (“MD&A”) are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with: The interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the three-month period ended June 27, 2004; the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” included in the Annual Report of Wescast for the year ended December 28, 2003; and with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 28, 2003. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto have not been reviewed by the Company’s external auditors pursuant to a review engagement applying review standards set out in the CICA Handbook.
Overview
Wescast Industries Inc. (“Wescast” or the “Company”) designs, casts, machines and assembles high-quality engineered iron products for automotive OEMs. The Company employs approximately 2,100 skilled and highly committed people in 8 production facilities and 5 sales and design centres in Canada, the United States, Japan and Europe. The Company is the world’s largest supplier of exhaust manifolds for passenger cars and light trucks.
The Company’s resources are strategically aligned to meet unique, customer-specific requirements. The Company believes that the combination of its design and high-quality manufacturing creates a unique value for the customers in the markets that it serves. The Company believes this is the reason for it being the world’s largest supplier of exhaust manifolds for passenger cars and light truck applications.
| • | The powertrain segment is focused on the design and manufacture of exhaust system components for sale primarily to original equipment manufacturers (“OEM’s”) and Tier 1 customers for car and light truck markets in North America and Europe. The Company’s Powertrain operations in North America are well established and consist of 6 production facilities. The European powertrain operations are conducted through Weslin Industries Inc. (“Weslin”), a relatively new operation, which is jointly managed by Wescast and Linamar Corporation. On March 10, 2004, the Company and Linamar Corporation announced Wescast’s intention to sell its 50% interest in Weslin to Linamar Corporation, pursuant to the terms of a joint-venture agreement. On June 8, 2004, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ordered that Wescast’s put of their interest in Weslin be stayed. The Court further ordered that the partners arrange a mutually agreeable division of Weslin, also pursuant to terms contained in the shareholders’ agreement. The Company has appealed this ruling pending the outcome of deliberations with the joint venture partner. As a result, the terms of the transaction and the resulting financial impact are not yet known. |
| • | The chassis segment is focused on the design and manufacture of brake and suspension components for sale to OEM and Tier 1 customers. The Company entered the segment in September 2002 with the acquisition of Georgia Ductile Foundries, LLC, renamed Wescast Industries Cordele, LLC (“Cordele”). This business, which was acquired while it was still in a start-up phase, is a developing business serving a North American customer base. On July 19, 2004, Wescast announced its intention to exit the chassis segment. Currently, the Company is preparing a plan to sell this entity. |
Highlights
The Company’s core business segment, represented by its North American powertrain operations, performed well in the second quarter. Casting unit volumes for the segment were unchanged from the second quarter of 2003, however machining volumes increased by 8.2%. The impact of market driven price reductions reduced gross profit by $3.5 million for the quarter compared with last year, however, this was offset by the benefits of favourable product mix and year-over-year improvements in manufacturing efficiencies. Raw material costs for both scrap steel and molybdenum continued to rise in the quarter, reducing gross profit by $4.7 million, net of recoveries from customers, versus the second quarter of the prior year. As a result of the decline in the market price of the Company’s shares during the quarter, the accrual for stock appreciation rights was reduced, resulting in a positive impact on pre-tax earnings of $1.8 million, versus an expense of $0.5 million in 2003.
During the quarter, the Company announced that it had been awarded several new programs, specifically:
| • | The supply of cast and machined exhaust manifolds for the Duratec 30 3.0L V6 engine program and the Modular 4.6L 3V engine program for Ford. On the latter program Wescast will supply the casting, while the machining will be completed by United Machining Inc., a joint venture between Uniboring Inc. and Wescast. Both programs are for 2005 model year applications. |
| • | The supply of cast and machined exhaust manifolds for the 2.0L and 2.4L World engine programs of the Global Engine Manufacturing Alliance (“GEMA”) for the 2005 model year. GEMA is a joint venture of DaimlerChrysler, Mitsubishi and Hyundai. |
These announcements demonstrate how the Company’s focus on improving its manufacturing, design and engineering capabilities has increased the value proposition for its customers, enabling it to generate growth within North American markets.
Weslin has shown year-over-year revenue growth and improved operating performance. This improvement has occurred despite higher raw material costs and delayed timing on some program launches. Scrap and equipment uptime metrics continue to show improvement.
The Chassis segment also continues to develop, however the manufacturing facility continues to experience inconsistent operating performance. Despite reporting higher revenues in the second quarter compared with 2003, the negative impact on earnings exceeded 2003 levels.
Results from Operations
Vehicle Production Volumes
North American light vehicle production volumes for the quarter totaled approximately 4.2 million units, a 1.3% increase over the same period in 2003. However, production during the quarter by the domestic Big 3 automakers, that comprise the Company’s primary customer base, was down 1.1 % compared to the same period in 2003.
Sales
Consolidated sales for the quarter were $119.6 million, an increase of 2.3% over the previous year’s level of $116.9 million.
Revenues from the sale of powertrain products in North America for the quarter, comprised of cast and machined iron manifolds, increased by 2.2% compared to the same period in 2003. Revenues were $99.8 million compared with $97.7 million in 2003. Unit sales of cast manifolds were 3.6 million, essentially unchanged from the second quarter of 2003. Sales to new domestic customers, specifically Nissan, and the volume impact of new programs with General Motors enabled the Company to outperform the 1.1% decrease in production volume experienced by the domestic Big 3, our primary customer base. While unit volumes remained unchanged, revenue growth from casting sales for the quarter resulted from favourable product mix changes and increased machining penetration compared with the second quarter of 2003. The level of manifolds that were both cast and internally machined rose to 82% of total manifolds produced, up from 76% over the same quarter last year. Machining volumes were up 8.2% during the period compared to 2003.
Sales of chassis components by the Cordele facility for the quarter were $10.8 million, an increase of 10.2% from the $9.8 million reported in the second quarter of 2003. The Company’s proportionate share of component sales by Weslin was $6.4 million for the quarter, up 25.5% from the $5.1 million reported in the second quarter of 2003; reflecting the continued ramp-up of this business, including the full-absorption of the production requirements for the Ford 4.0L program.
Consolidated revenue from prototype and tooling sales for the quarter declined by $1.7 million to $2.6 million compared to $4.3 million for the same period a year ago. Prototype and tooling sales are a function of customer program timing, making specific period-over-period comparisons difficult.
On a year-to-date basis sales of $238.2 million were 1.5% lower than the $242.0 million reported in 2003. The majority of the decline was related to lower prototype and tooling sales in the first six months of 2004 compared with 2003. The decline is a function of customer program timing. Units cast are flat to last year, while units cast and machined are up by 7.3%.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the quarter was $25.8 million, which reflects a decline of 10.9% compared with the $28.9 million reported in the second quarter of 2003. The decline was the result of several factors as follows:
| • | Increases in raw material and other commodity prices and market driven selling price reductions which combined to negatively impact the profitability of the Company’s North American powertrain business. These factors were partially offset by the strong operating performance in the manufacturing operations, the savings generated by company-wide cost reduction initiatives, and the positive impact on gross profit from the increased machining penetration. |
| • | The Company’s gross profit for the quarter was negatively impacted by the continued support of the ramp-up of activities in Georgia and Hungary. |
| The Company’s operation in Hungary, Weslin, continues to focus on launch activities and operating performance improvement and continues to experience quarter-over-quarter improvements. The chassis component operation in Georgia continues to focus on improving and building the consistency of its operating performance. This operation has not been able to consistently maintain targeted operating metrics, including moulds per hour, finishing throughput levels and scrap rates. The performance of the operation continues to be impacted by unplanned equipment downtime issues resulting in increased maintenance costs, overtime and other costs necessary to ensure that customer delivery requirements are met. These costs, coupled with raw material cost increases have negatively impacted the profitability of the operation. The overall negative impact for the quarter on net earnings from the Cordele operation was $4.5 million, reflecting an increased loss of $1.0 million over the $3.5 million negative impact the operation reported in the second quarter of last year. The impact on net earnings from the Weslin business during the quarter was a loss of $1.3 million, an improvement of $1.0 million over the $2.3 million loss reported in the second quarter of 2003. These operations continue to receive leadership, technical and administrative support from the Company’s core operations in an effort to accelerate the performance improvement and meet customer launch requirements. |
| • | The second quarter of 2003 included the positive impact of government investment tax credits applied to offset expenditures on research and development activities conducted in the facilities in prior periods which improved gross profit by $1.1 million, similar credits in 2004 impacted earnings by to a far lesser extent, $0.1 million. |
On a year-to-date basis gross profit declined by $6.6 million to $49.1 million, compared with $55.7 million reported in the first six months of 2003. The decline reflects the impact of customer driven price reductions and increased raw material and commodity prices on the core powertrain business and increased year-over-year losses in the Chassis segment. This was partially offset by improved profitability at Weslin.
Selling, General and Administration
The Company’s selling, general and administrative costs for the quarter were $9.6 million, an increase of $0.6 million over the $9.0 million incurred in the same period in 2003. The bulk of this increase relates to severance costs accrued during the quarter. Cost reduction efforts within administrative departments successfully offset most inflationary cost increases experienced during the quarter. As a percentage of sales, these expenses increased slightly from 7.7% in the second quarter of 2003 to 8.0% in 2004. Included in selling, general and administration expenses for the quarter was depreciation of $1.7 million, up slightly from the $1.6 million included in the second quarter of 2003.
On a year-to-date basis the Company’s selling, general and administrative expenses have increased by $1.7 million over 2003 to $19.6 million. The majority of the increase from the $17.9 million reported in 2003 relates to severance costs incurred during 2004.
Stock-based Compensation
In connection with options granted under the Company’s stock option plan, participants are granted tandem stock appreciation rights. Under the plan, participants have the choice of exercising stock options or receiving cash from the Company for the options equal to their intrinsic value, being the difference between the option exercise price and the current market value of the shares. The increase or decrease in the intrinsic value of the stock options is included as stock-based compensation expense. The market price of the Company’s shares decreased during the quarter, resulting in a positive impact of $1.8 million on pre-tax earnings. In the second quarter of 2003, an increase in the market price of the Company’s shares resulted in a negative impact of $0.5 million on pre-tax earnings.
Over the first six months of 2004 stock-based compensation has increased pre-tax earnings by $1.7 million. This compares to a $0.7 million positive impact on earnings reported in 2003. The change reflects the impact of year-over-year changes in the market value of the Company’s share price.
Research, Development and Design
The Company’s research, development and design expenses of $1.8 million this quarter were in line with the $1.9 million incurred over the same period of 2003. The Company remains committed to funding customer focused research and development activities: however the impact of a company-wide focus on cost reduction initiatives resulted in lower discretionary spending.
On a year-to-date basis research, development and design expenses of $3.5 million are lower than the $4.1 million reported over the same period in 2003. The change reflects the impact of cost reduction efforts on discretionary spending as well as reduced spending on the Company’s “hot end solutions” initiative. This activity has moved out of the research intense development phase and is now focused on addressing customer specific applications.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the quarter of $0.2 million was down slightly from the $0.4 million incurred over the same period in 2003.
Interest Income
Interest income for the quarter was slightly higher than reported in the same period in 2003, as a result of higher average cash balances on hand during the quarter compared with the same period in 2003.
Income Taxes
The effective tax rate reflected for the quarter was 35.2 %, compared with a rate of 33.1% in 2003. The rate change reflects the increase in statutory rates applicable to income earned in the Province of Ontario, and a reduced impact from the cost sharing arrangements in place with Weslin. The Weslin operation is eligible for a tax holiday, with earnings not subject to income taxes during the first ten years of operations. Consequently no tax benefit has been recognized with respect to the losses generated by Weslin.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Financial Resources
At June 27, 2004 the Company had $37.5 million in cash and cash equivalents compared with $28.7 million at the end of 2003 and $7.2 million in bank indebtedness at the end of the second quarter of 2003. The change reflects the strong cash flows generated from operations during the quarter which more than offset the cash outflows for the quarter related to capital expenditures and dividend payments. The Company expects to generate cash reserves from operations over the balance of the year and is well positioned to support future growth initiatives.
Operating Activities
The Company generated $27.1 million in cash from continuing operations during the second quarter, compared with $5.3 million in cash generated from continuing operations during the second quarter of 2003. The increase was primarily attributable to changes in non-cash working capital in North America. The incremental reduction in non-cash working capital during the quarter was $9.2 million compared to an investment of $15.6 million in 2003. The increased working capital requirements in 2003 resulted from the settlement of accounts payable balances associated with new machine lines acquired earlier that year.
Over the first six months of 2004 the Company has generated $31.0 million in cash from continuing operations, this compares with $0.8 million in cash generated over the same period in 2003.
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures for the second quarter were $11.1 million, which was slightly higher than the $10.8 million incurred during the second quarter last year. Capital expenditures continue to be closely monitored. Project approvals are focused at specific capacity requirements, projects generating a rapid payback or those projects required for safety or environmental initiatives.
On a year-to-date basis capital expenditures of $16.5 million compares with $25.0 million incurred over the same period in 2003. The higher spending in 2003 reflects the impact of machine line purchases incurred during that period.
Financing Activities
Net repayments of long-term debt during the quarter totaled $2.5 million, reflecting scheduled bond redemptions during the period. This compares to $3.9 million in net long-term debt repayments in 2003. Dividends paid during the quarter were $0.12 per common share, consistent with the second quarter of 2003.
Financing Resources
At June 27, 2004 the Company was in a very strong financial position. Cash and cash equivalents were $37.5 million at the end of the second quarter versus $7.2 million in bank indebtedness a year earlier. The Company has uncommitted demand operating facilities totaling US$36.4 million, all of which were undrawn at June 27, 2004.
Shareholders Equity
Shareholders’ equity increased to $454.3 million from $437.2 million at December 28, 2003. The increase resulted from earnings retained in the Company and an increase in the value of the cumulative translation adjustment account. The cumulative translation adjustment account represents the unrealized increase in the value of the Company’s investments in its self-sustaining subsidiaries operating in foreign currencies and translated to Canadian dollars at current rates of exchange.
Outlook
Although there can be no certainty as to future levels of production, based on currently available information, the Company views the economic outlook for the automotive industry in 2004 to be stable. Industry estimates project that 2004 North American light vehicle production levels will be in the range of 15.7 to 16.1 million vehicles, in line with the 15.9 million units achieved in 2003.
The Company anticipates its 2004 production levels of its North American Powertrain segment will also remain in a range consistent with those achieved in 2003. Pricing to North American customers has been under severe downward pressure for several months. Wescast prices are compared against new global pricing benchmarks causing the company to retain business at lower average prices. This pressure is expected to continue. The North American operations have been very successful to date at achieving manufacturing efficiencies to offset most of the pricing pressures described above and will need to continue this success over the longer term.
The Company’s results are also sensitive to raw material prices for scrap steel and moly. Increases in world-wide demand for these materials have caused their costs to escalate significantly over the last year resulting in a significant negative impact on the financial results. World-wide demand is expected to remain strong; as a result, prices are expected to remain high and could escalate further in future periods.
With the announcement to exit the chassis segment, Wescast’s revised global strategy is focused on its successful core competency of designing, casting and machining powertrain components. The Company sees high potential in expanding this segment of the business by following its customers into European and Asian marketplaces.
The strategic direction is in the following areas:
| • | The focus of the core Powertrain segment in North America will be on becoming more cost competitive in an effort to address the significant pressure on pricing that is being exerted by the customer base. This pressure has intensified with the growing threat from competitors based in low cost countries, specifically China. To meet this challenge the Company will focus resources on the investigation of new technologies in an effort to uncover advances capable of generating quantum improvements in our operations. In addition, we will continue to pursue aggressive year-over-year cost reduction targets in these operations. Progress has been made toward achieving these targets by applying the Company’s HEART participative management process and continuous improvement focus. To date many cost reduction initiatives have been identified and are being implemented. |
| • | The efficiency gains targeted in the Company’s core Powertrain operations will create available foundry capacity that can be utilized to support the production needs of automakers with operations in North America who are not current customers of the Company, or can be utilized to produce new products that fit the focus of these manufacturing operations. In 2003, a dedicated team was assembled to review and develop business case recommendations on specific products meeting these criteria. This team will continue to evaluate new opportunities in 2004. |
| • | The Company will work toward, and anticipates achieving, a resolution to the change in ownership of Weslin prior to the end of 2004. |
| • | The Company will continue to evaluate both the threat and opportunities that may exist in the emerging automotive industry in Asia, specifically China. In this regard, the Company continues to review specific business opportunities that would enable Wescast to participate in the Asian market. |
| • | The Company has engaged outside advisors to assist in the evaluation of alternatives to exit the Chassis business, including sale. |
The Company believes that maintaining the focus on these areas is the best means to ensure the long-term success of the business.
Forward-Looking Information
Certain information provided by Wescast in this MD&A and in other documents published throughout the year that is not a recitation of historical facts may constitute forward-looking information, within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words “estimate”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking information involves important risks and uncertainties that could materially alter results in the future from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of the Company. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, global economic and industry conditions causing changes to production volumes, changes in raw material and other input costs, price reduction pressures, dependence on certain vehicles and major OEM customers, program launch delays, currency exposure, contract negotiations with the unionized workforce, failure in implementing Company strategy, technological developments by the Company’s competitors, government and regulatory policies and changes in the competitive environment in which the Company operates. While the Company believes that its forecasts and assumptions are reasonable, persons reading this report are cautioned that such statements are only predictions and that actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating such forward-looking statements readers should specifically consider the various factors which could cause actual events or results to differ from those indicated by such forward-looking statements.