| Certain Provisions of Articles, Bylaws, and Nevada statutes Provisions with anti-takeover implications. As described above, the Board may issue preferred stock and set the voting rights, preference, and other terms thereof, and the Class B common stock possesses disproportionate voting rights. In addition, the Bylaws provide that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the Chairman of the Board, the President, or a majority of the directors. Stockholders are not permitted to call a special meeting of stockholders, to require that the Chairman call such a special meeting, or to require that the Board request the calling of a special meeting of stockholders. Such provisions, and the provisions of Chapter 78 of the Nevada Revised Statutes summarized below, may have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer, or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt not first approved by the Board. Indemnification and limitation of liability. Under the terms of the Articles and Bylaws, the Company will indemnify its officers, directors, employees, and agents against all liabilities and expenses actually and reasonably incurred in connection with service for or on behalf of the Company to the fullest extent allowed by Chapter 78 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, unless it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that (i) they failed to act in a manner they believed in good faith to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Company, and (ii) with respect to any criminal proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe their conduct was lawful. In addition, the applicable provisions mandate that the Company indemnify its officers and directors who have been successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of any such action, suit, or proceeding against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with such defense. The Articles also eliminate, to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law, the liability of directors and officers to the Company or its stockholders for monetary or other damages for breach of fiduciary duties as a director or officer. Nevada anti-takeover statutes Business combinations act. The Articles do not opt out of Nevada's anti-takeover law, and, therefore, the Company is subject to its provisions. This law provides that any person who is: · the direct or indirect beneficial owner of 10% or more of outstanding voting stock of a Nevada corporation; or · an affiliate or associate of a Nevada corporation who, at any time within three years, was the direct or indirect owner of 10% or more the corporation's outstanding voting stock is an interested stockholder who cannot engage in specified business combinations with the corporation for a period of three years after the date on which the person became an interested stockholder. Business combinations encompass a wide variety of transactions with or caused by an interested stockholder, including mergers, asset sales, and other transactions in which the interested stockholder receives or could receive a benefit on other than a pro rata basis with other stockholders. Provisions of this law have an anti-takeover effect on transactions not approved in advance by the Board. |