| | (a) Dismissal of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm On April 17, 2020, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) of the Company, made the decision to change the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and the Company dismissed KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as its independent registered public accounting firm. The audit reports of KPMG on the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except as follows: • The audit report of KPMG on the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 contained a paragraph stating that “As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases, and subsequently issued additional ASUs amending this ASU (collectively ASC 842, Leases).” The audit reports of KPMG on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that KPMG’s report indicates that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 because of the effect of a material weakness described in the following paragraph. During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and from January 1, 2020 through March 10, 2020, there were no “disagreements” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and related instructions) with KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG, would have caused KPMG to make reference in connection with their opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and from January 1, 2020 through April 17, 2020, there have been no “reportable events” (as defined in Regulation S-K Item 304(a)(1)(v)); except for a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting identified during the audit for the year ended December 31, 2018 related to the design and maintenance of effective program change management controls over certain information technology (“IT”) operating systems, databases and IT applications that support the Company’s financial reporting processes. This material weakness was disclosed in Item 9A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 and was disclosed by the Company as remediated in Item 9A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company has requested that KPMG furnish a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Item 304(a)(3) of Regulation S-K, stating whether or not KPMG agrees with the statements related to them made by the Company in this report. A copy of KPMG’s letter, dated April 23, 2020, is attached as Exhibit 16 to this report. (b) Newly Engaged Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
On April 17, 2020, the Audit Committee made the decision to engage Grant Thornton LLP (“GT”) as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, effective immediately, to perform independent audit services for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 or 2018, and from January 1, 2020 through April 17, 2020, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted GT regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company by GT that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was the subject of a “disagreement” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) or a “reportable event” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K). |
