Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Text Block] | Note 2. Stock-Based Compensation In May 2015, our shareholders approved the Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). This plan combines into a single plan the Company’s 2005 Executive Cash Bonus Plan (the “2005 Plan”) and the 2012 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2012 Plan”) and allows for future grants under the 2015 Plan. Grants outstanding under the 2005 Plan and 2012 Plan will continue in force and effect and continue to be governed solely by the terms and conditions of the instrument evidencing such grants, and will be interpreted under the terms of the 2005 Plan and the 2012 Plan, as applicable. Since approval of the 2015 Plan in May 2015, all grants of stock-based compensation are made under the 2015 Plan. Stock-based compensation expense for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, and 2015, are as follows (dollars in thousands): Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Stock compensation expense for options, net of forfeitures $ 513 $ 280 $ 884 $ 446 Stock compensation expense for restricted stock units and performance restricted stock units, net of forfeitures 1,288 1,167 1,697 3,154 Total stock compensation expense $ 1,801 $ 1,447 $ 2,581 $ 3,600 Our policy is to recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. As of June 30, 2016, we have approximately $4.3 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years and a total period of 3.7 years. We have approximately $9.4 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock unit awards, which is anticipated to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.5 years and a total period of 6.6 years. We also have approximately $8.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested performance awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years and total period of 3.6 years. A total of 569,480 and 590,141 stock options were granted during the first six months of 2016 and 2015, respectively. We received approximately $6.7 million in cash from the exercise of stock options during the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $6.5 million for the same period in 2015. A summary of the option award activity under our equity compensation plan as of June 30, 2016, and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2016, is presented below: Option Totals Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share Outstanding as of December 31, 2015 2,008,872 $ 21.41 Granted 569,480 24.23 Exercised (371,805 ) 17.94 Forfeited (61,830 ) 25.59 Outstanding as of June 30, 2016 2,144,717 23.04 The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Listed below are the weighted-average assumptions used for the fair value computation: Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 2015 Dividend yield (1) 0.99 % 0.80 % Expected volatility (2) 27.91 % 25.88 % Risk-free interest rate (3) 0.90 % 0.98 % Expected term (years) (4) 2.74 2.74 Weighted-average fair value of options granted $ 4.28 $ 5.00 (1) Dividend yield – the dividend yield is based on our historical experience and future expectation of dividend payouts. (2) Expected volatility – we analyzed the volatility of our stock using historical data. (3) Risk-free interest rate – the risk-free interest rate assumption is based on U.S. Treasury securities at a constant maturity with a maturity period that most closely resembles the expected term of the stock option award. (4) Expected term – the expected term of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding and has been determined based on an analysis of historical exercise behavior. A total of 4,350 and 13,950 restricted stock unit awards were granted during the first six months of 2016 and 2015, respectively. A summary of the restricted stock unit award activity under our equity compensation plans as of June 30, 2016, and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2016, is presented below: Number of Restricted Stock Unit Awards Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Unvested as of December 31, 2015 879,173 $ 16.45 Granted 4,350 26.38 Vested (154,667 ) 16.73 Forfeited (5,240 ) 16.43 Unvested as of June 30, 2016 723,616 16.45 The fair value of each restricted stock unit is based on the closing market price on the date of grant. Beginning in 2014, we issued performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) to selected key employees that may be earned based on revenue growth and return on assets, and may then be modified based on our total shareholder return, as defined in the instrument evidencing the grant, over a three-year period. The primary award adjustment may range from 0 percent to 150 percent of the initial grant, based upon performance achieved over the three-year period. The primary award modifier, which would multiply the adjusted primary award by 75 percent to 125 percent, is measured by determining the percentile rank of the total shareholder return, as defined in the instrument evidencing the grant, of Knight Transportation common stock in relation to the total shareholder return of a peer group for the three-year period. The final award will be based on performance achieved in accordance with the scale set forth in the plan agreement. PRSUs do not earn dividend equivalents. A total of 177,741 and 165,720 PRSUs were granted in the first six months of 2016 and 2015, respectively. A summary of the performance restricted stock unit award activity for the six months ended June 30, 2016 is presented below: Number of Performance Restricted Stock Unit Awards Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Unvested as of December 31, 2015 341,782 $ 26.46 Granted 177,741 23.89 Shares earned above target 2,516 23.85 Vested (5,391 ) 23.85 Cancelled (1,238 ) 23.89 Unvested as of June 30, 2016 515,410 $ 25.59 The number of granted shares, cancelled shares, and unvested shares are included in the table above based on the performance target established at the initial grant date. The performance measurement period for the awards granted in the six months ended June 30, 2016, is January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. These awards will vest January 31, 2020, or thirteen months following the expiration of the performance period. The fair value of each PRSU grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model. Listed below are the weighted-average assumptions used for the fair value computation: Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 2015 Dividend yield (1) 0.99 % 0.80 % Expected volatility (2) 27.95 % 23.18 % Average peer volatility (2) 34.37 % 30.70 % Average peer correlation coefficient (3) 0.6022 0.49 Risk-free interest rate (4) 0.89 % 0.78 % Expected term (5) 2.84 2.63 Weighted-average fair value of PRSUs granted $ 23.89 $ 29.30 (1) The dividend yield, used to project stock price to the end of the performance period, is based on our historical experience and future expectation of dividend payouts. Total shareholder return is determined assuming that dividends are reinvested in the issuing entity over the performance period, which is mathematically equivalent to utilizing a 0% dividend yield. (2) We (or peer company) estimated volatility using our (or their) historical share price performance over the remaining performance period as of the grant date. (3) The correlation coefficients are used to model the way in which each entity tends to move in relation to each other; the correlation assumptions were developed using the same stock price data as the volatility assumptions. (4) The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on U.S. Treasury securities at a constant maturity with a maturity period that most closely resembles the expected term of the performance award. (5) Since the Monte Carlo simulation valuation is an open form model that uses an expected life commensurate with the performance period, the expected life of the PRSUs was assumed to be the period from the grant date to the end of the performance period. |