Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Text Block] | Note 2. Stock-Based Compensation In May 2015, 2015 “2015 2005 “2005 2012 “2012 2015 2005 2012 2005 2012 2015 May 2015, 2015 three six June 30, 2017, 2016, Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 2017 2016 Stock compensation expense for options, net of forfeitures $ 482 $ 513 $ 830 $ 884 Stock compensation (benefit)/expense for restricted stock units and performance restricted stock units, net of forfeitures (328 ) 1,288 743 1,697 Total stock compensation expense, net of forfeitures $ 154 $ 1,801 $ 1,573 $ 2,581 Our policy is to recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. As of June 30, 2017, $5.0 2.0 3.9 $10.6 3.1 5.6 $0.5 2.0 2.6 A total of 497,421 569,480 first six 2017 2016, $6.3 six June 30, 2017, $6.7 2016. A summary of the option award activity under our equity compensation plans for the six June 30, 2017, Option Totals Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 1,737,400 $ 23.19 Granted 497,421 33.35 Exercised (342,307 ) 20.76 Forfeited (121,861 ) 26.56 Outstanding as of June 30, 2017 1,770,653 $ 26.29 The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Listed below are the weighted-average assumptions used for the fair value computation: Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 Dividend yield (1) 0.72 % 0.99 % Expected volatility (2) 27.95 % 27.91 % Risk-free interest rate (3) 1.49 % 0.90 % Expected term (4) 3.22 2.74 Weighted-average fair value of options granted $ 6.78 $ 4.28 ( 1 Dividend yield – the dividend yield is based on our historical experience and future expectation of dividend payouts. ( 2 Expected volatility – we analyzed the volatility of our stock using historical data. ( 3 Risk-free interest rate – the risk-free interest rate assumption is based on U.S. Treasury securities at a constant maturity with a maturity period that most closely resembles the expected term of the stock option award. ( 4 Expected term – the expected term of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding and has been determined based on an analysis of historical exercise behavior. A total of 124,145 4,350 first six 2017 2016, six June 30, 2017, Number of Restricted Stock Unit Awards Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Unvested as of December 31, 2016 686,786 $ 16.46 Granted 124,145 33.35 Vested (124,991 ) 16.78 Forfeited (26,264 ) 17.31 Unvested as of June 30, 2017 659,676 $ 19.90 The fair value of each restricted stock unit is based on the closing market price on the date of grant. The Company issues PRSUs to selected key employees, that may three 0 150 75 125 not No first six 2017 177,741 first six 2016. A summary of the PRSU activity under our equity compensation plans for the six June 30, 2017 Number of Performance Restricted Stock Unit Awards Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Unvested as of December 31, 2016 508,478 $ 25.60 Granted - - Shares earned above target - - Vested - - Cancelled (10,112 ) 25.40 Unvested as of June 30, 2017 498,366 $ 25.60 The number of granted shares, cancelled shares, and unvested shares are included in the table above based on the performance target established at the initial grant date. The fair value of each PRSU grant is estimated on the grant date using the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model. Listed below are the weighted-average assumptions used for the fair value computation: Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 Dividend yield (1) - 0.99 % Expected volatility (2) - 27.95 % Average peer volatility (2) - 34.37 % Average peer correlation coefficient (3) - 0.6022 Risk-free interest rate (4) - 0.89 % Expected term (5) - 2.84 Weighted-average fair value of PRSUs granted - $ 23.89 ( 1 The dividend yield, used to project stock price to the end of the performance period, is based on our historical experience and future expectation of dividend payouts. Total shareholder return is determined assuming that dividends are reinvested in the issuing entity over the performance period, which is mathematically equivalent to utilizing a 0% ( 2 We (or peer company) estimated volatility using our (or their) historical share price performance over the remaining performance period as of the grant date. ( 3 The correlation coefficients are used to model the way in which each entity tends to move in relation to each other; the correlation assumptions were developed using the same stock price data as the volatility assumptions. ( 4 The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on U.S. Treasury securities at a constant maturity with a maturity period that most closely resembles the expected term of the performance award. ( 5 Since the Monte Carlo simulation valuation is an open form model that uses an expected life commensurate with the performance period, the expected life of the PRSUs was assumed to be the period from the grant date to the end of the performance period. |