Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments For financial reporting purposes, we follow a fair value hierarchy established under GAAP that is used to determine the fair value of financial instruments. This hierarchy prioritizes relevant market inputs in order to determine an “exit price” at the measurement date, or the price at which an asset could be sold or a liability could be transferred in an orderly process that is not a forced liquidation or distressed sale. Level 1 inputs are observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs are observable inputs other than quoted prices for an asset or liability that are obtained through corroboration with observable market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs (e.g., our own data or assumptions) that are used when there is little, if any, relevant market activity for the asset or liability required to be measured at fair value. In certain cases, inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level at which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability being measured. The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded or disclosed at fair value at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Table 5.1 – Carrying Values and Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value (In Thousands) Assets Residential loans, held-for-sale At fair value $ 1,427,052 $ 1,427,052 $ 834,193 $ 834,193 At lower of cost or fair value 893 993 1,206 1,365 Residential loans, held-for-investment At fair value 3,687,265 3,687,265 3,052,652 3,052,652 Trading securities 968,844 968,844 445,687 445,687 Available-for-sale securities 507,666 507,666 572,752 572,752 MSRs 63,598 63,598 118,526 118,526 Cash and cash equivalents 144,663 144,663 212,844 212,844 Restricted cash 2,144 2,144 8,623 8,623 Accrued interest receivable 27,013 27,013 18,454 18,454 Derivative assets 15,718 15,718 36,595 36,595 REO (1) 3,354 3,806 5,533 5,560 Margin receivable (1) 85,044 85,044 68,038 68,038 FHLBC stock (1) 43,393 43,393 43,393 43,393 Guarantee asset (1) 2,869 2,869 4,092 4,092 Commercial loans (1) — — 2,700 2,700 Pledged collateral (1) 42,615 42,615 42,875 42,875 Liabilities Short-term debt facilities $ 1,688,412 $ 1,688,412 $ 791,539 $ 791,539 Accrued interest payable 18,435 18,435 9,608 9,608 Margin payable (2) 390 390 12,783 12,783 Guarantee obligation (2) 19,487 18,878 21,668 22,181 Derivative liabilities 63,081 63,081 66,329 66,329 ABS issued at fair value, net 1,164,585 1,164,585 773,462 773,462 FHLBC long-term borrowings 1,999,999 1,999,999 1,999,999 1,999,999 Convertible notes, net 686,759 692,369 482,195 493,365 Trust preferred securities and subordinated notes, net 138,535 103,230 138,489 96,255 (1) These assets are included in Other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. (2) These liabilities are included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , we elected the fair value option for $47 million and $5 million of residential senior securities, $594 million and $288 million of subordinate securities, $5.64 billion and $4.85 billion of residential loans (principal balance), and $8 million and $25 million of MSRs, respectively. We anticipate electing the fair value option for all future purchases of residential loans that we intend to sell to third parties or transfer to securitizations as well as for MSRs purchased or retained from sales of residential loans, and for certain securities we purchase, including IO securities and fixed-rate securities rated investment grade or higher. The following table presents the assets and liabilities that are reported at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , as well as the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs used to measure fair value. Table 5.2 – Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis December 31, 2017 Carrying Value Fair Value Measurements Using (In Thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Residential loans $ 5,114,317 $ — $ — $ 5,114,317 Trading securities 968,844 — — 968,844 Available-for-sale securities 507,666 — — 507,666 Derivative assets 15,718 134 10,164 5,420 MSRs 63,598 — — 63,598 Pledged collateral 42,615 42,615 — — FHLBC stock 43,393 — 43,393 — Guarantee asset 2,869 — — 2,869 Liabilities Derivative liabilities $ 63,081 $ 3,808 $ 55,567 $ 3,706 ABS issued 1,164,585 — — 1,164,585 December 31, 2016 Carrying Fair Value Measurements Using (In Thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Residential loans $ 3,886,845 $ — $ — $ 3,886,845 Trading securities 445,687 — — 445,687 Available-for-sale securities 572,752 — — 572,752 Derivative assets 36,595 8,300 24,980 3,315 MSRs 118,526 — — 118,526 Pledged collateral 42,875 42,875 — — FHLBC stock 43,393 — 43,393 — Guarantee asset 4,092 — — 4,092 Liabilities Derivative liabilities $ 66,329 $ 5,609 $ 56,919 $ 3,801 ABS issued 773,462 — — 773,462 The following table presents additional information about Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Table 5.3 – Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Assets Liabilities Residential Loans Trading Securities AFS Securities MSRs Guarantee Asset Derivatives (1) ABS Issued (In Thousands) Beginning balance - December 31, 2016 $ 3,886,845 $ 445,687 $ 572,752 $ 118,526 $ 4,092 $ (486 ) $ 773,462 Acquisitions 5,741,427 640,760 39,700 8,026 — — 567,099 Sales (3,982,683 ) (137,886 ) (90,440 ) (52,788 ) — — — Principal paydowns (573,168 ) (19,224 ) (58,554 ) — — — (205,163 ) Gains (losses) in net income, net 46,119 39,507 31,892 (10,166 ) (1,223 ) 37,220 29,187 Unrealized losses in OCI, net — — 12,316 — — — — Other settlements, net (2) (4,223 ) — — — — (35,020 ) — Ending balance - December 31, 2017 $ 5,114,317 $ 968,844 $ 507,666 $ 63,598 $ 2,869 $ 1,714 $ 1,164,585 Assets Liabilities (In Thousands) Residential Loans Commercial Loans Trading Securities AFS Securities MSRs Guarantee Asset Derivatives (1) Commercial Secured Borrowings ABS Issued Beginning balance - December 31, 2015 $ 3,797,551 $ 106,798 $ 404,011 $ 829,245 $ 191,976 $ 5,697 $ 3,208 $ 63,152 $ 996,820 Acquisitions 4,747,564 37,625 292,875 34,520 25,362 — — — — Sales (3,813,538 ) (81,523 ) (244,219 ) (252,696 ) (62,440 ) — — — — Principal paydowns (806,081 ) (476 ) (17,827 ) (62,229 ) — — — (306 ) (208,215 ) Gains (losses) in net income, net (33,893 ) 2,791 10,847 48,399 (36,372 ) (1,605 ) 30,193 2,369 (8,275 ) Unrealized gains in OCI, net — — — (24,487 ) — — — — — Other settlements, net (2) (4,758 ) (65,215 ) — — — — (33,887 ) (65,215 ) (6,868 ) Ending balance - December 31, 2016 $ 3,886,845 $ — $ 445,687 $ 572,752 $ 118,526 $ 4,092 $ (486 ) $ — $ 773,462 (1) For the purpose of this presentation, derivative assets and liabilities, which consist of loan purchase and forward sale commitments, are presented on a net basis. (2) Other settlements, net for residential loans represents the transfer of loans to REO, and for derivatives, the transfer of the fair value of loan purchase commitments at the time loans are acquired to the basis of residential loans. For commercial secured borrowings and commercial loans, the reduction in 2016 represents the derecognition of our commercial secured borrowings and related commercial A-note investments upon sale of the associated B-notes. The following table presents the portion of gains or losses included in our consolidated statements of income that were attributable to Level 3 assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and held at December 31, 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . Gains or losses incurred on assets or liabilities sold, matured, called, or fully written down during the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 are not included in this presentation. Table 5.4 – Portion of Net Gains (Losses) Attributable to Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Still Held at December 31, 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 Included in Net Income Included in Net Income Years Ended December 31, (In Thousands) 2017 2016 2015 Assets Residential loans at Redwood $ 523 $ (17,370 ) $ (5,541 ) Residential loans at consolidated Sequoia entities 17,727 (14,391 ) 7,422 Commercial loans — — (2,620 ) Trading securities 28,612 7,184 (13,391 ) Available-for-sale securities (1,011 ) (368 ) (246 ) MSRs 1,277 42,964 (3,471 ) Loan purchase commitments 3,243 — 4,252 Loan forward sale commitments 2,177 — — Other assets - Guarantee asset (1,223 ) (1,605 ) (1,504 ) Liabilities Loan purchase commitments $ (3,706 ) $ (486 ) $ — Commercial secured borrowing — — 3,011 ABS issued (29,187 ) 8,275 (8,366 ) The following table presents information on assets recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . This table does not include the carrying value and gains or losses associated with the asset types below that were not recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Table 5.5 – Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis Gain (Loss) for Year Ended December 31, 2017 Carrying Value Fair Value Measurements Using (In Thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 December 31, 2017 Assets Residential loans, at lower of cost or fair value $ 854 $ — $ — $ 854 $ 22 REO 2,034 — — 2,034 (393 ) Gain (Loss) for Year Ended December 31, 2016 Carrying Fair Value Measurements Using (In Thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 December 31, 2016 Assets Residential loans, at lower of cost or fair value $ 867 $ — $ — $ 867 $ (17 ) Commercial loans, at lower of cost or fair value 2,700 — — 2,700 (300 ) REO 5,207 — — 5,207 (1,831 ) The following table presents the net market valuation gains and losses recorded in each line item of our consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . Table 5.6 – Market Valuation Gains and Losses, Net Years Ended December 31, (In Thousands) 2017 2016 2015 Mortgage Banking Activities, Net Residential loans held-for-sale, at fair value $ 31,493 $ 5,786 $ 3,712 Residential loan purchase and forward sale commitments 37,880 25,613 50,234 Commercial loans, at fair value — 433 10,265 Sequoia securities — 1,455 (15,261 ) Risk management derivatives, net (17,529 ) 3,158 (42,468 ) Total mortgage banking activities, net (1) $ 51,844 $ 36,445 $ 6,482 Investment Fair Value Changes, Net Residential loans held-for-investment at Redwood $ (5,765 ) $ (23,102 ) $ (6,337 ) Trading securities 39,526 9,666 (2,019 ) Valuation adjustments on commercial loans held-for-sale 300 (307 ) — Net investments in Legacy Sequoia entities (2) (8,027 ) (4,200 ) (1,192 ) Net investments in Sequoia Choice entities (2) (323 ) — — Risk-sharing investments (1,484 ) (1,151 ) (1,886 ) Risk management derivatives, net (12,842 ) (9,112 ) (9,677 ) Impairments on AFS securities (1,011 ) (368 ) (246 ) Total investment fair value changes, net $ 10,374 $ (28,574 ) $ (21,357 ) MSR Income (Loss), Net MSRs $ (10,166 ) $ (36,372 ) $ (24,392 ) Risk management derivatives, net (568 ) 15,584 (12,708 ) Total MSR loss, net (3) $ (10,734 ) $ (20,788 ) $ (37,100 ) Total Market Valuation Gains (Losses), Net $ 51,484 $ (12,917 ) $ (51,975 ) (1) Mortgage banking activities, net presented above does not include fee income or provisions for repurchases that are components of Mortgage banking activities, net presented on our consolidated statements of income, as these amounts do not represent market valuation changes. (2) Includes changes in fair value of the residential loans held-for-investment, REO and the ABS issued at the entities, which netted together represent the change in value of our retained investments at the consolidated VIEs. (3) MSR income (loss), net presented above does not include net fee income or provisions for repurchases that are components of MSR income (loss), net on our consolidated statements of income, as these amounts do not represent market valuation adjustments. Valuation Policy We maintain a policy that specifies the methodologies we use to value different types of financial instruments. Significant changes to the valuation methodologies are reviewed by members of senior management to confirm the changes are appropriate and reasonable. Valuations based on information from external sources are performed on an instrument-by-instrument basis with the resulting amounts analyzed individually against internal calculations as well as in the aggregate by product type classification. Initial valuations are performed by our portfolio management groups using the valuation processes described below. Our finance department then independently reviews all fair value estimates using available market, portfolio, and industry information to ensure they are reasonable. Finally, members of senior management review all fair value estimates, including an analysis of the methodology and valuation changes from prior reporting periods. Valuation Process We estimate fair values for financial assets or liabilities based on available inputs observed in the marketplace as well as unobservable inputs. We primarily use two pricing valuation techniques: market comparable pricing and discounted cash flow analysis. Market comparable pricing is used to determine the estimated fair value of certain instruments by incorporating known inputs and performance metrics, such as observed prepayment rates, delinquencies, severities, credit support, recent transaction prices, pending transactions, or prices of other similar instruments. Discounted cash flow analysis techniques generally consist of developing an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of an instrument and then discounting those cash flows at a rate of return that results in an estimate of fair value. After considering all available indications of the appropriate rate of return that market participants would require, we consider the reasonableness of the range indicated by the results to determine an estimate that is most representative of fair value. We also consider counterparty credit quality and risk as part of our fair value assessments. The following table provides quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of our Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value. Table 5.7 – Fair Value Methodology for Level 3 Financial Instruments December 31, 2017 Fair Value Input Values (Dollars in Thousands, except Input Values) Unobservable Input Range Weighted Average Assets Residential loans, at fair value: Jumbo fixed rate loans $ 3,372,329 Whole loan spread to TBA price $ 2.25 - $ 3.11 $ 3.09 Whole loan spread to swap rate 175 - 225 bps 224 bps Jumbo hybrid loans 251,847 Prepayment rate (annual CPR) 15 - 15 % 15 % Whole loan spread to swap rate 100 - 185 bps 159 bps Jumbo loans committed to sell 237,262 Whole loan committed sales price $ 100.78 - $ 103.01 $ 101.42 Loans held by Legacy Sequoia (1) 632,817 Liability price N/A N/A Loans held by Sequoia Choice (1) 620,062 Liability price N/A N/A Residential loans, at lower of cost or fair value 854 Loss severity 12 - 30 % 18 % Trading and AFS securities 1,476,510 Discount rate 3 - 15 % 5 % Prepayment rate (annual CPR) — - 50 % 10 % Default rate — - 27 % 3 % Loss severity — - 40 % 22 % MSRs 63,598 Discount rate 10 - 130 % 11 % Prepayment rate (annual CPR) 5 - 26 % 9 % Per loan annual cost to service $ 79 - $ 82 $ 82 Guarantee asset 2,869 Discount rate 11 - 11 % 11 % Prepayment rate (annual CPR) 13 - 13 % 13 % REO 2,034 Loss severity 6 - 42 % 21 % Liabilities Loan purchase commitments, net (2) 462 MSR multiple 1.7 - 5.1 x 3.6 x Pull-through rate 9 - 100 % 75 % Whole loan spread to TBA price $ 2.25 - $ 3.10 $ 3.06 Whole loan spread to swap rate - fixed rate 175 - 225 bps 225 bps Prepayment rate (annual CPR) 15 - 15 % 15 % Whole loan spread to swap rate - hybrid 100 - 185 bps 151 bps ABS issued (1) 1,164,585 Discount rate 3 - 15 % 4 % Prepayment rate (annual CPR) 8 - 25 % 17 % Default rate — - 16 % 3 % Loss severity 20 - 54 % 23 % (1) The fair value of the loans held by consolidated Sequoia entities was based on the fair value of the ABS issued by these entities, which we determined were more readily observable, in accordance with accounting guidance for collateralized financing entities. (2) For the purpose of this presentation, loan purchase commitment assets and liabilities are presented net. Determination of Fair Value A description of the instruments measured at fair value as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 valuation hierarchy is listed herein. We generally use both market comparable information and discounted cash flow modeling techniques to determine the fair value of our Level 3 assets and liabilities. Use of these techniques requires determination of relevant inputs and assumptions, some of which represent significant unobservable inputs as indicated in the preceding table. Accordingly, a significant increase or decrease in any of these inputs – such as anticipated credit losses, prepayment rates, interest rates, or other valuation assumptions – in isolation would likely result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. Residential loans at Redwood Estimated fair values for residential loans are determined using models that incorporate various observable inputs, including pricing information from whole loan sales and securitizations. Certain significant inputs in these models are considered unobservable and are therefore Level 3 in nature. Pricing inputs obtained from market whole loan transaction activity include indicative spreads to indexed TBA prices and indexed swap rates for fixed-rate loans and indexed swap rates for hybrid loans (Level 3). Pricing inputs obtained from market securitization activity include indicative spreads to indexed TBA prices for senior RMBS, indexed swap rates for subordinate RMBS, and credit support levels (Level 3). Other unobservable inputs also include assumed future prepayment rates. Observable inputs include benchmark interest rates, swap rates, and TBA prices. These assets would generally decrease in value based upon an increase in the credit spread, prepayment speed, or credit support assumptions. Residential loans at consolidated Sequoia entities We have elected to account for the consolidated Sequoia securitization entities as collateralized financing entities in accordance with GAAP. A CFE is a variable interest entity that holds financial assets and issues beneficial interests in those assets, and these beneficial interests have contractual recourse only to the related assets of the CFE. Accounting guidance for CFEs allow companies to elect to measure both the financial assets and financial liabilities of a CFE using the more observable of the fair value of the financial assets or fair value of the financial liabilities. Pursuant to this guidance, we use the fair value of the ABS issued by the Sequoia CFEs (which we determined to be more observable) to determine the fair value of the loans held at these entities, whereby the net assets we consolidate in our financial statements related to these entities represent the estimated fair value of our retained interests in the Sequoia CFEs. Real estate securities Real estate securities include residential, commercial, and other asset-backed securities that are generally illiquid in nature and trade infrequently. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis are predominantly Level 3 in nature, due to the lack of readily available market quotes and related inputs. For real estate securities, we utilize both market comparable pricing and discounted cash flow analysis valuation techniques. Relevant market indicators that are factored into the analysis include bid/ask spreads, the amount and timing of credit losses, interest rates, and collateral prepayment rates. Estimated fair values are based on applying the market indicators to generate discounted cash flows (Level 3). These cash flow models use significant unobservable inputs such as a discount rate, prepayment rate, default rate, loss severity and credit support. The estimated fair value of our securities would generally decrease based upon an increase in default rates, loss severities, or a decrease in prepayment rates or credit support. As part of our securities valuation process, we request and consider indications of value from third-party securities dealers. For purposes of pricing our securities at December 31, 2017 , we received dealer price indications on 80% of our securities, representing 85% of our carrying value. In the aggregate, our internal valuations of the securities for which we received dealer price indications were within 1% of the aggregate average dealer valuations. Once we receive the price indications from dealers, they are compared to other relevant market inputs, such as actual or comparable trades, and the results of our discounted cash flow analysis. In circumstances where relevant market inputs cannot be obtained, increased reliance on discounted cash flow analysis and management judgment are required to estimate fair value. Derivative assets and liabilities Our derivative instruments include swaps, swaptions, TBAs, financial futures, loan purchase commitments, and forward sale commitments. Fair values of derivative instruments are determined using quoted prices from active markets, when available, or from valuation models and are supported by valuations provided by dealers active in derivative markets. Fair values of TBAs and financial futures are generally obtained using quoted prices from active markets (Level 1). Our derivative valuation models for swaps and swaptions require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit curves, measures of volatility, prepayment rates, and correlations of certain inputs. Model inputs can generally be verified and model selection does not involve significant management judgment (Level 2). LPC and FSC fair values for jumbo loans are estimated based on the estimated fair values of the underlying loans (as described in " Residential loans " above). In addition, fair value for LPCs are estimated based on the probability that the mortgage loan will be purchased (the "Pull-through rate") (Level 3). For other derivatives, valuations are based on various factors such as liquidity, bid/ask spreads, and credit considerations for which we rely on available market inputs. In the absence of such inputs, management’s best estimate is used (Level 3). MSRs MSRs include the rights to service jumbo and conforming residential mortgage loans. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis are predominantly Level 3, due to the nature of these instruments and the lack of readily available market quotes. Changes in the fair value of MSRs occur primarily due to the collection/realization of expected cash flows, as well as changes in valuation inputs and assumptions. Estimated fair values are based on applying the inputs to generate the net present value of estimated future MSR income (Level 3). These discounted cash flow models utilize certain significant unobservable inputs including market discount rates, assumed future prepayment rates of serviced loans, and the market cost of servicing. An increase in these unobservable inputs would generally reduce the estimated fair value of the MSRs. As part of our MSR valuation process, we received a valuation estimate from a third-party valuations firm. In the aggregate, our internal valuation of the MSRs were within 2% of the third-party valuation. FHLBC Stock Our Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") member subsidiary is required to purchase Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago ("FHLBC") stock under a borrowing agreement between our FHLB-member subsidiary and the FHLBC. Under this agreement, the stock is redeemable at face value, which represents the carrying value and fair value of the stock (Level 2). Guarantee Asset The guarantee asset represents the estimated fair value of cash flows we are contractually entitled to receive related to a risk-sharing arrangement with Fannie Mae. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis are Level 3, due to the nature of this asset and the lack of market quotes. The fair value of the guarantee asset is determined using a discounted cash flow model, for which significant unobservable inputs include assumed future prepayment rates and market discount rate (Level 3). An increase in prepayment rates or discount rate would generally reduce the estimated fair value of the guarantee asset. Pledged Collateral Pledged collateral consists of cash and U.S. Treasury securities held by a custodian in association with certain agreements we have entered into. Treasury securities are carried at their fair value, which is determined using quoted prices in active markets (Level 1). Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Fair values equal carrying values (Level 1). Restricted cash Restricted cash primarily includes interest-earning cash balances related to risk-sharing transactions with the Agencies, cash held in association with borrowings from the FHLBC, and cash held at consolidated Sequoia entities for the purpose of distribution to investors and reinvestment. Due to the short-term nature of the restrictions, fair values approximate carrying values (Level 1). Accrued interest receivable and payable Accrued interest receivable and payable includes interest due on our assets and payable on our liabilities. Due to the short-term nature of when these interest payments will be received or paid, fair values approximate carrying values (Level 1). REO REO includes properties owned in satisfaction of foreclosed loans. Fair values are determined using available market quotes, appraisals, broker price opinions, comparable properties, or other indications of value (Level 3). Margin receivable Margin receivable reflects cash collateral we have posted with our various derivative and debt counterparties as required to satisfy margin requirements. Fair values approximate carrying values (Level 2). Guarantee Obligations In association with our risk-sharing transactions with the Agencies, we have made certain guarantees. These obligations are initially recorded at fair value and subsequently carried at amortized cost. Fair values of guarantee obligations are determined using internal models that incorporate certain significant inputs that are considered unobservable and are therefore Level 3 in nature. Pricing inputs include assumed future prepayment rates, credit losses, and market discount rates. A decrease in future prepayment rates or discount rates, or an increase in credit losses, would generally cause the fair value of the guarantee obligations to decrease (i.e., become a larger liability). Short-term debt Short-term debt includes our credit facilities that mature within one year. As these borrowings are secured and subject to margin calls and as the rates on these borrowings reset frequently to market rates, we believe that carrying values approximate fair values (Level 2). Additionally, at December 31, 2017 , short-term debt included unsecured convertible senior notes with a maturity of less than one year. The fair value of the convertible notes is determined using quoted prices in generally active markets (Level 2). ABS issued ABS issued includes asset-backed securities issued through the Legacy Sequoia and Sequoia Choice securitization entities. These instruments are generally illiquid in nature and trade infrequently. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis are predominantly Level 3, due to the nature of these instruments and the lack of readily available market quotes. For ABS issued, we utilize both market comparable pricing and discounted cash flow analysis valuation techniques. Relevant market indicators factored into the analysis include bid/ask spreads, the amount and timing of collateral credit losses, interest rates, and collateral prepayment rates. Estimated fair values are based on applying the market indicators to generate discounted cash flows (Level 3). These cash flow models use significant unobservable inputs such as a discount rate, prepayment rate, default rate, loss severity and credit support. A decrease in credit losses or discount rates, or an increase in prepayment rates, would generally cause the fair value of the ABS issued to decrease (i.e., become a larger liability). FHLBC Borrowings FHLBC borrowings include amounts borrowed from the FHLBC that are secured, generally by residential mortgage loans. As these borrowings are secured and subject to margin calls and as the rates on these borrowings reset frequently to market rates, we believe that carrying values approximate fair values (Level 2). Convertible notes Convertible notes include unsecured convertible and exchangeable senior notes. Fair values are determined using quoted prices in generally active markets (Level 2). Trust preferred securities and subordinated notes Estimated fair values of trust preferred securities and subordinated notes are determined using discounted cash flow analysis valuation techniques. Significant inputs in the valuation analysis are predominantly Level 3, due to the nature of these instruments and the lack of readily available market quotes. Estimated fair values are based on applying the market indicators to generate discounted cash flows (Level 3). |