| | | | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6b2d/b6b2d67ff2c95c44d881869a3d27dc88ed81713f" alt="LOGO" | | | | |
| | | | 1875 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006-1238 Tel: 202 303 1000 Fax: 202 303 2000 |
March 10, 2023
VIA EDGAR
Mr. David Manion
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549
Re: iShares Trust (the “Trust”)
(Securities Act File No. 333-92935 and
Investment Company Act File No. 811-09729)
iShares Inc. (the “Company”)
(Securities Act File No. 33-97598 and
Investment Company Act File No. 811-09102)
Dear Mr. Manion:
This letter responds to your comments with respect to certain of the Trust’s and the Company’s (together, the “Registrant’s”) annual reports and post-effective amendments to the registration statement, each of which were filed by the Registrant on behalf of the series listed on Appendix A (each, a “Fund,” and together, the “Funds”). The comments were provided by the SEC staff (the “Staff”) in a telephone conversation on February 2, 2023. For your convenience, the Staff’s comments are summarized below, and each comment is followed by the Registrant’s response. Capitalized terms have the meanings assigned in each Fund’s prospectus unless otherwise defined in this letter. The following responses apply to each Fund unless stated otherwise.
Comment 1: For the ESG Aware ETFs that are fund of funds (e.g., iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF), for the stub period ending 7/31/20, the ratios to average net assets have been annualized except for net investment income. Please confirm how the net investment income ratio was calculated (i.e., whether it was annualized or absolute).
Response: The Registrant confirms that, for the stub period ending 7/31/20, the ratio of net investment income to average net assets is annualized. The Registrant will include a footnote indicating that the ratio is annualized in future shareholder reports.
Comment 2: For the ESG Aware ETFs that are fund of funds (e.g., iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF), please explain how the Funds’ benchmark index has been deemed to be an “appropriate broad-based securities market index” for the Funds in compliance with Form N-1A Item 4(b)(2)(iii) and Instruction 5 of Item 27(b)(7).
BRUSSELS CHICAGO FRANKFURT HOUSTON LONDON LOS ANGELES MILAN
NEW YORK PALO ALTO PARIS ROME SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON