UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
Mark One
o | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 |
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
o | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report |
Commission file number: 001-13406
Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Provida Pension Fund Administrator Inc.
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
Republic of Chile
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Avenida Pedro de Valdivia 100, Providencia,
Santiago, Chile
(Address of principal executive offices)
María Paz Yáñez Macías
Planning and Control Division Manager
Avenida Pedro de Valdivia 100, Santiago, Chile
Telephone number: (56-2) 2351-1483
Fax number: (56-2) 2351-1019
E-mail: myanezm@bbvaprovida.cl
(Name, Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s agent for service)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
Common Stock, without nominal (par) value | New York Stock Exchange* | |
American Depositary Shares (ADS) each representing fifteen shares of Common Stock, without nominal (par) value | New York Stock Exchange |
* Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of ADS, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: | [None] |
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: | [None] |
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
Common Stock, without nominal (par) value — 331,316,623 Shares
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. | o Yes x No |
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to | |
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | o Yes x No |
Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o | Accelerated Filer x | Non-accelerated Filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
o | U.S. GAAP |
x | International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board |
o | Other |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
o Item 17 o Item 18
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
o Yes x No
Page | |
4 | |
4 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
7 | |
8 | |
8 | |
8 | |
13 | |
13 | |
15 | |
39 | |
41 | |
41 | |
42 | |
42 | |
54 | |
55 | |
56 | |
56 | |
56 | |
58 | |
59 | |
65 | |
66 | |
66 | |
66 | |
67 | |
70 | |
70 | |
70 | |
70 | |
71 | |
71 | |
71 | |
72 | |
74 | |
74 | |
74 | |
74 | |
74 | |
74 | |
76 | |
77 | |
79 | |
84 | |
84 | |
84 | |
84 | |
84 | |
86 | |
86 | |
86 | |
Page | |
86 | |
86 | |
87 | |
87 | |
87 | |
88 | |
91 | |
91 | |
91 | |
92 | |
92 | |
92 | |
92 | |
92 | |
92 | |
92 | |
92 | |
93 |
In this annual report, references to “US$”, “US dollars” and “dollars” are to United States dollars, references to ThUS$ are thousands of US dollars and MUS$ are millions of US dollars; references to “pesos” or “Ch$” are to Chilean pesos, references to “Ch$ million” or “MCh$” are to millions of Chilean pesos; and references to “UF” are to Unidades de Fomento. The Unidad de Fomento (“UF”) is a unit of account that is linked to, and is adjusted daily to reflect changes in the Chilean consumer price index. As of December 31, 2012, one UF was equivalent to Ch$22,840.75. Percentages and certain dollar and peso amounts contained herein have been rounded for ease of presentation. Unless otherwise indicated, the exchange rate used to translate peso amounts into dollars appearing throughout this annual report is the Dolar Observado (the “Observed Exchange Rate”) reported by the Banco Central de Chile (the “Central Bank”) on December 31, 2012, which was Ch$479.96 = US$1.00. These translations should not be construed as representations that the peso amounts actually represent such dollar amounts or could be converted into dollars at the rates indicated or at any other rate.
Our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and, unless otherwise indicated, other financial information concerning AFP Provida S.A. included in this report are presented in Chilean pesos. Until the year ended December 31, 2009, AFP Provida S.A. prepared its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Chile (Chilean GAAP). In accordance with the rules of the Superintendency of Pensions beginning in 2010, AFP Provida S.A. has prepared its financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB).
The terms “AFP Provida”, “Provida” and the “Company”, unless the context indicates otherwise, refer to Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida S.A. References to “AFP” or “AFPs” refer to private pension fund administrators in general.
The term “Authority” means the Superintendencia de Pensiones (“Superintendency of Pensions”), the principal regulator of Chile’s pension system.
The term “Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria”, “BBVA Group” and “BBVA, Spain” means the parent of AFP Provida which currently performs this function through Inversiones Previsionales S.A. (formerly done through BBVA Inversiones Chile SA).
In this annual report and as related to Provida’s business, the term “participant” means a client that has made contributions at least once to his individual capitalization account, while “contributor” means a participant periodically making pension contributions. The term “individual capitalization account” (ICA) means for each participant the account where he or she maintains his/her mandatory savings invested in shares of the selected pension fund until the age of retirement.
This Form 20-F contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements appear throughout this Form 20-F and include statements regarding intent, belief or current expectations of our officers or our management with respect to (i) our asset growth and financing plans, (ii) trends affecting our financial condition and results of operations, (iii) the impact of competition and regulations, and (iv) our exposure to various types of market risks, such as interest rate risk, foreign exchange rate risk and market price risk. Forward-looking statements include known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are indicated by words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “risk”, “could”, “may”, “seeks”, and similar words and phrases and the negatives and variations thereof. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those described in such forward-looking statements in this Form 20-F, including, without limitation, “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview”, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”.
Some factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 20-F include, but are not limited to: general economic conditions in Chile and Latin
America and the other countries in which we have significant business activities or investments, including the United States; the monetary and interest rate policies of the Central Bank; unanticipated turbulence in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices or other rates or prices; changes in Chilean and foreign laws, regulations and taxes; changes in competition and pricing environments; natural disasters; the inability to hedge certain risks economically; the adequacy of loss reserves; technological changes; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and our success in managing the risks involved in the foregoing.
The forward-looking statements contained in this document are made only as of the date of this report, and we do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Not applicable. |
Not applicable. |
Recent regulatory changes |
The Law for the Pension Reform N°20,255 (the “Pension Reform Law” or “Reform Law”) was enacted on March 11, 2008 and published in the Official Gazette on March 17, 2008. The first stage of the Pension Reform Law, referred to as the “solidarity principle” and directed at granting pensions and solidarity pension contributions to the country's poorest sectors, was implemented in July 2008.
In October 2008, matters relating to collective voluntary pension savings, Governmental subsidy to formalize the hiring of young workers, voluntary affiliation, and certain life and disability insurance (entitlement of women up to 65 years of age, entitlement of spouses to become insurance beneficiaries, and the elimination of a second determination in cases of total disability) were implemented. Additionally, investment measures were implemented, such as expanding the investment alternatives to pension funds in Chile and at the international level; gradually increasing the abroad investment limits; establishing an investment regime fixing limits on indirect investment and authorizing Fund Type E to invest in variable income (up to 5% of its portfolio).
One of the main changes introduced by the Pension Reform Law and implemented in 2009 was the life and disability insurance bidding process in order to: (i) increase transparency in fees charged by AFPs and in costs related to the life and disability insurance; (ii) obtain a more competitive price for this insurance; (iii) correct gender inequities; and iv) not permitting AFPs to assume individual risks by reducing incentives to discriminate among participants, leading AFPs to focus on competence based on variables in the administration of individual accounts. Likewise, this new modality intends to appropriately regulate and control the risks of providing life and disability insurance.
The life and disability bidding process is carried out by the AFPs as a whole. This process is ruled by regulations established in the Law and in the bidding conditions. In this offer, any life insurers may participate provided that they are legally constituted at the bidding date. The insurance should be awarded to one or more insurance companies offering the best economic offer. Awarding the insurance to more than one insurer avoids excessive risk concentration for the coverage of the entire life and disability insurance risk. The awarding criteria are established by the General Rule of the Superintendency of Pensions and the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance.
Likewise, the participants’ contributions destined to finance the insurance expressed as a percentage of remunerations and taxable incomes, have a uniform character for all the system’s participants. Although the AFPs are not responsible for financing the insurance, the premiums are collected along with mandatory contributions of participants, being transferred to the insurance companies.
A difference due to participants’ gender may arise between the contribution to finance the insurance and the necessary premium to finance such insurance. The AFPs should transfer the difference in each of the capitalization accounts of those participants who paid a higher contribution to such premium.
In the case of bankruptcy of any awarded insurance company, the rest of the insurers would assume the corresponding risk regarding those casualties occurred since the bankruptcy date and until the expiration date of the contract. In the case of bankruptcy of all involved insurance companies, the State guarantees the necessary additional contributions to complete the required amount to finance the life and disability pension through the “State Guarantee”. The coverage of such guarantee is from 100% of the prevailing minimum pension and 75% over the excess of the pension with a maximum of UF 45 for each beneficiary or pensioner.
In May 2009, the first life and disability insurance bidding process was carried out for a 12-month coverage period effective on July 1, 2009. Under this new modality, the insurance cost was 1.87% over the taxable remunerations of workers for all the AFPs. The second life and disability insurance bidding for a 24-month coverage period effective on July 1, 2010 was awarded at an average cost of 1.49%. The third bidding process, for a 24-month coverage period effective on July 1, 2012, was awarded at an average cost of 1.26%.
As Provida no longer provides the insurance coverage, the Company reduced the fees charged to its participants from 2.64% to 1.54% over their taxable remunerations starting on July 1, 2009.
It is important to mention that in the case of dependent workers, the contribution to finance the insurance (additional contribution) is paid by the employer, except for dependent young workers (between 18 and 35 years) who receive pension subsidies. This obligation became effective on July 1, 2009, and a temporary grace period for workers with fewer than 100 employees ended in June 2011.
The last change of the Pension Reform Law that was implemented in 2010 was related to the bidding process to award an AFP the individual capitalization account administration of all new participants entering into the private pension system for a 24-month term. This bidding process encouraged price competition among AFPs and has led to lower fees for participants, causing greater sensitivity in price demand, favoring the entrance of new actors in the AFP industry and protecting the participants’ equity interest.
The awarded AFP is the AFP offering the lowest fee (which at the same time must be less than the fees in effect at the date of the bidding process) for a 24-month period, during which such AFP is not able to modify its fees, being extensive to the portfolios of participants already managed by such AFP.
The first bidding process was carried out in January 2010, in which AFP Cuprum S.A., AFP Habitat S.A., AFP Planvital S.A. and AFP Modelo S.A. participated. On February 1, 2010 it was announced that the awarded company was AFP Modelo, offering the lowest fee of 1.14%. AFP Modelo started operations on August 1, 2010, therefore, from that date onwards those dependent and self-employed workers, as well as voluntary participants that enter for the first time to the pension system of individual capitalization, must contribute for a 24-month period in AFP Modelo.
In January 2012, the second bidding process to award all new participants was carried out, in which AFP Modelo, AFP Planvital and AFP Regional (which has been legally incorporated, but has not yet started operations) participated. On January 30, 2012, the Superintendency of Pensions announced that the AFP offering the lowest fee of 0.77% was AFP Modelo, therefore, beginning on August 1, 2012, all new participants will be incorporated in AFP Modelo.
Provida considers that it possesses competitive advantages to successfully face the new conditions in the industry, given its more than 30 years of experience in the pension industry. Additionally, Provida has carried out all the processes and developments in order to fully comply with all the changes brought about by the implementation of the Pension Reform Law, and has continued training its workers to provide the best service to customers.
The following table presents selected financial and operating information for Provida as of the dates and for each of the fiscal years indicated. The 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 financial information is derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Our audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the IASB.
The financial data as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 in the table below are presented in nominal pesos.
In general, amounts are expressed in millions of Chilean pesos except for ratios, operating data, shares and ADS data. For the convenience of the reader, all data presented in dollars in the following summary, from and at the end of the year ended December 31, 2012, are translated at the Observed Exchange Rate for December 31, 2012 of Ch$479.96 per US$1.00. These translations should not be construed as representations that the Chilean peso amounts actually represent such dollar amounts or could be converted into dollars at the rates indicated or at any other rate.
, | ||||||||||||||||
As of and for fiscal years ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Income Statement Data | ||||||||||||||||
IFRS: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues from operations(1) | 178,233 | 149,779 | 169,342 | 214,002 | ||||||||||||
Expenses from operations(2) | (69,364 | ) | (67,151 | ) | (71,897 | ) | (133,358 | ) | ||||||||
Net operating income | 108,868 | 82,628 | 97,445 | 80,644 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expenses) net(3) | 20,671 | 13,939 | 11,619 | 8,247 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | (25,506 | ) | (17,712 | ) | (17,440 | ) | (14,449 | ) | ||||||||
Profit (loss) | 104,034 | 78,855 | 91,624 | 74,442 | ||||||||||||
Profit per share and per ADS (4) | ||||||||||||||||
Profit from operations per share | 329 | 249 | 294 | 243 | ||||||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share | 314 | 238 | 277 | 225 | ||||||||||||
Dividends per share and per ADS (5) | 276 | 209 | 187 | 58 | ||||||||||||
Dividends per share and per ADS (in US$) (6) | 0.58 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.11 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (in thousands) | 331,317 | 331,317 | 331,317 | 331,317 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position | ||||||||||||||||
IFRS: | ||||||||||||||||
Current assets | 119,296 | 86,178 | 68,652 | 62,089 | ||||||||||||
Mandatory investment | 217,072 | 201,418 | 204,526 | 179,129 | ||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 26,383 | 27,787 | 28,660 | 29,641 | ||||||||||||
Total assets | 406,975 | 390,348 | 377,992 | 344,664 | ||||||||||||
Equity | 314,674 | 304,780 | 293,994 | 269,378 |
(1) | Revenues from operations include revenues from fee income, gains (losses) on mandatory investments and other revenues. |
(2) | Expenses from operations include life and disability insurance premium expense, employee expenses, depreciation and amortization, impairment losses and miscellaneous other operating expenses. |
(3) | Other income (expenses) include finance costs, financial income, share of profit (loss) of associates accounted for using equity method, exchange differences, other non-operating income and expenses. |
(4) | Profit per share and per ADS data have been calculated on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each fiscal year. |
(5) | Calculated on the basis of one share per ADS. Dividends per share and per ADS in Chilean pesos represent actual dividends paid to December 31, 2012. |
(6) | Dividends per share and per ADS in US dollars have been calculated by translating the Chilean pesos paid into US dollars using the Observed Exchange Rate as of the date of each respective payment. |
Exchange rate information
The following table sets forth, for the periods and dates indicated, certain information concerning the exchange rate between the Chilean peso and the US dollar. Such exchange rates are provided solely for the convenience of the reader and are not necessarily the exchange rates used by the Company in the preparation of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report. No representation is made to the effect that the Chilean peso could have been, or could be, converted into US dollars at the exchange rates indicated below or at any other exchange rate.
Nominal Rate of Exchange (Chilean pesos per US$1.00) | |||
Year | Average | High | Low |
2008 | 521.79 | 676.75 | 431.22 |
2009 | 559.67 | 643.87 | 491.09 |
2010 | 510.38 | 549.17 | 468.37 |
2011 | 483.57 | 533.74 | 455.91 |
2012 | 486.59 | 519.69 | 469.65 |
Source: Central Bank.
Nominal Rate of Exchange (Chilean pesos per US$1.00) | |||
Months | Monthly Average | High | Low |
October 2012 | 475.67 | 481.98 | 471.54 |
November 2012 | 480.56 | 484.48 | 476.20 |
December 2012 | 477.11 | 481.28 | 474.36 |
January 2013 | 472.28 | 475.47 | 470.67 |
February 2013 | 472.42 | 473.60 | 470.67 |
March 2013 | 472.44 | 474.82 | 471.10 |
Source: Central Bank.
According to the latest information published by the Central Bank at the date of issuance of this report, the exchange rate on April 15, 2013 was Ch$472.12 per US$1.00.
Not applicable. |
Not applicable. |
In addition to the information contained in this annual report, prospective investors should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information contained in this annual report. Provida’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks.
The economic situation in Chile significantly affects Provida’s results
The main source of Provida’s revenues from operations comes from the monthly fees charged to its contributors for mandatory contributions made in their individual capitalization accounts, which are compulsory for every salaried worker as long as there is a labor contract in force. These represented 83.4% of the total revenues from operations for the year ended December 31, 2012. As a result, the economic situation in Chile related to activity indicators and employment conditions significantly affects the Company’s results.
Macroeconomic conditions affect the financial capacity of employers and/or entrepreneurs, which might produce a drop in the number of employee contributors or a lack of capacity for creating new jobs, and decrease the salary of
workers. Therefore, both variables—number of employee contributors and average salary—determine the salary base of the contributors and affect the Company’s results. An increase in the unemployment rate negatively affects Provida’s results and, depending on its magnitude, the impact could be significant.
Additionally, Provida’s financial condition and operations results could also be adversely affected by changes in the economic policies implemented by the Chilean Government, political or economic developments in Chile or those affecting Chile. Changes in development of the Chilean economy could adversely affect Provida’s ability to develop its business strategy.
It is important to note that another factor affecting the country's economy and thus, Provida's results, relate to natural disasters that might occur in Chile, (i.e. an earthquake, such as the one that occurred on February 27, 2010) if they affect the unemployment level in the country, result in tax increases or cause significant damage to Provida’s assets.
Pension funds are global investors, which are affected by the economies of neighboring countries as well as by worldwide economic development
Pension funds, such as those managed by Provida, are global investors and are therefore affected by both the economies of neighboring countries as well as by worldwide economic factors. In recent years, pension fund returns have been subject to volatility in international and local financial markets, where foreign investments represented 39.6% of Provida’s total assets under management for the year ended December 31, 2012.
The Pension Reform Law increased the percentage of investments which AFPs are allowed to make abroad, from a range between 30% to 45% to a range between 30% to 60% during the first twelve months following the enactment of the Pension Reform Law (from October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009); and between 30% to 80% since the thirteenth month (October 1, 2009). In September 2008, the Central Bank gradually increased the maximum investments limits abroad: 45% from October 1, 2008, 50% from December 1, 2008, 55% from April 1, 2009 and 60% from August 3, 2009. In November 2010, the Central Bank increased again the maximum global investment limit abroad from 60% to 80%, gradually increasing as follows: 65% from December 1, 2010, 70% from March 1, 2011, 75% from June 1, 2011 and 80% from September 1, 2011.
Such increase permits pension funds to have new investment opportunities, which could improve the diversity of their investment portfolios, but at the same time increases the potential exposure to the international markets of the total assets managed by the AFPs.
The worldwide economy could affect Provida’s returns obtained on mandatory investments and therefore its net profit.
Provida’s returns on its investments in foreign companies could be affected by changes in the regulatory environment, the exchange rates and the economic situation of the countries where such companies are located
Provida through its subsidiary Provida Internacional S.A. (“Provida Internacional”) has maintained equity interests in private pension fund administrators operating in Peru, Ecuador and Mexico, whose results represented in the aggregate MCh$9,963 (MUS$20.8) of Provida’s net profit for the year ended December 31, 2012.
The Company is exposed to risks of exchange rate and market performances in those countries where it holds equity interest in companies that administer pension funds.
Likewise, an adverse fluctuation in the exchange rate between the currencies of such countries and the Chilean peso could negatively affect the profits from foreign companies and thus, their respective returns.
Additionally, the risks associated with the performances of pension markets where such companies participate, as the pension systems are highly regulated, refer to possible changes in the legal framework and to the economic situation where the companies are, since there is high correlation between their profits and the conditions of activity and employment of the respective country.
It is noteworthy that commencing in 2013, Provida no longer has equity interests in Peru and Mexico, given the sale of these associates in the first quarter of 2013, as detailed below.
Failure to commence or consummate the pending tender offer by the MetLife Group could adversely affect Provida’s stock price
On February 1, 2013, a Transaction Agreement was executed by and among Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. and BBVA Inversiones S.A., on the one hand, as sellers, and on the other hand, as purchasers, MetLife, Inc. and certain affiliates (hereinafter, jointly referred as the “MetLife Group”) (the “Agreement”). Pursuant to the Agreement, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth therein, will sell to the MetLife Group the total direct and indirect stake it holds in Provida.
As described in further detail under “—Recent Developments”, the obligation of the MetLife Group to commence the tender offer and to close the transactions contemplated in the Agreement is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including receipt of regulatory approvals in Chile and Ecuador. The Company cannot assure investors that these conditions will be met, or that the tender offer will be commenced or consummated.
If the tender offer is not commenced or consummated, the market price of the Company’s common stock may decline.
Provida has limitations on significantly increasing its market position
According to official statistics released by the Superintendency of Pensions, Provida has maintained a leading position in the private pension system since its incorporation, which has led to a market share nearly 37% in terms of number of participants and over 28% in terms of assets under management. Given its position in this market and its relative size, it is highly probable that competitors will take steps toward attracting participants from Provida and persuading them to transfer their funds and make contributions to other AFPs, limiting Provida from significantly increasing its market share. A decrease in Provida’s participant portfolio could have a negative impact on its revenues from operations.
Provida is limited in its ability to improve the performance of its assets under management
Provida’s assets under management totaling MCh$22,079,265 (US$46.0 billion) as of December 31, 2012 are very large with respect to the size of the local capital market measured by its total capitalization. The latter reduces Provida’s flexibility to significantly modify its portfolio structures, and consequently to improve the return offered to its participants. Additionally, in situations of instability or uncertainty in the markets, Provida’s reactive capacity is likely to be limited. In this context, Provida cannot ensure that it will be able to maintain a sufficient rate of return on its pension funds to decrease the number of participant transfers. Any decrease in Provida’s participant portfolio could have a negative impact on its revenues from operations.
Additionally, if pension fund returns managed by Provida do not achieve the legal minimum return established by law, due to any instability or uncertainty in capital markets as described above, the Company could lose part of its mandatory investments aimed at covering this difference. (See “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Principal activities—Investment services for participants’ contributions in the pension funds”). This portion must be replenished in a maximum term of 15 days to fulfill the legal requirement to maintain a reserve equal to 1% of the value of each pension fund under management and to continue with its business with the consequent reduction in the Company’s equity.
Provida operates in a regulated market in which its flexibility to manage its business is limited
Provida’s operations are regulated by the Pension Law and, to the extent applicable, Chilean corporation law. The Pension Law defines the scope of the business of pension fund administrators, which only permits Provida to engage in the administration of its pension funds and the rendering of related benefits. Provida is also authorized to establish local related corporations that may complement its line of business or invest in pension fund administrators or entities located in other countries whose business is related to pension matters.
Regarding pension fund investments, Provida must invest such assets in accordance with the types of instruments and within the ranges of assets and maximum percentages allocated per investment and fund type authorized by the Pension Law.
In addition, the Pension Law requires each AFP to maintain a minimum reserve fund known as mandatory investment equal to 1% of the value of each pension fund under management in order to provide a minimum real return on investment for each of its pension funds. This minimum return is based on a weighted average of the real return by all pension funds in the AFP system in a 36-month period. This requirement has been designated in accordance with different portfolio compositions, giving those with a higher component of variable income and therefore higher volatility (funds Type A and B), a larger margin to achieve the requirement. If a fund’s real return for a certain month were lower than the minimum return, the AFP must cover the difference within a 5-day period. To do so, the AFP is permitted to apply funds from the mandatory investments, and in that event, such amount must be refunded within 15 days. In accordance with the Pension Law, if an AFP fails to comply with either the minimum return requirement or the minimum reserve fund requirement, it may eventually be required to be dissolved. See “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Principal activities—Investment services for participants’ contributions in the pension funds”.
The Pension Reform Law increased the investment limits for the pension funds. However, Provida cannot ensure that it will be able to fulfill minimum return requirements or the minimum reserve.
Provida’s business and results of operations may be affected by changes in laws, regulations or Chilean Government proposals
On January 16, 2008, the Pension Reform Law to the private pension system was approved and was published as the Republic Law (N° 20,255) in the Official Gazette on March 17, 2008. The first changes started to be implemented on July 1, 2008. Changes introduced by the reform can be summarized in four areas: coverage improvement, new industrial organization, investments and new institutional framework.
As a result of the implementation of the Pension Reform Law, there is an important factor influencing the Company’s ability to capture new affiliations that enter the pension system. The generation of accounts related to new participants entering the system is awarded every two years, beginning in July 2010 and for a 24 month period, to the AFP offering the lowest variable fee. This fee must be lower than the lowest fee operating in the industry and must apply to the AFP’s entire portfolio, not only to the portion awarded.
Provida’s management believes that the approved reform consolidates the current private pension system and provides an adequate legal framework for AFPs to continue developing their activities. In reference to the coverage improvement, Provida believes that this implies a new business opportunity for AFPs. Additionally, Provida believes that the flexibility of investment alternatives makes increased competition possible.
However, future changes in laws or regulations in Chile may have a negative effect on Provida’s financial results.
In addition, Provida is subject to changes in tax laws. Reflecting the above, in September 2012 Chile implemented a new law maintaining the applicable tax rate at 20% instead of lowering the rate to 18.5% for 2012 and 17% from 2013 thereon. Further increases in applicable taxes, or other negative tax treatment, could have a negative effect on Provida’s financial results.
The risk of a higher casualty rate and the consequent effect on expenses from operations is subject to the fluctuation of interest rates for life annuities and the returns achieved by pension funds
In terms of expenses from operations, life and disability insurance has represented an important source of expenditures for the Company. Life and disability insurance is considered a long-term obligation because the benefits to disabled participants are rendered following the final disability determination test, which is three years after the initial disability determination (in the case of partial disability defined as a decrease between one half and two thirds of the working capacity). Until October 2009, the total disability benefits (in the case of total disability, defined as a decrease in more than two thirds in the working capacity) were also granted three years after the initial disability determination.
Before the changes introduced by the Pension Reform Law that included the bidding process for life and disability insurance by all the AFPs in July 2009 (see “Item 3. Key Information —Recent Regulatory Changes”), Provida by law was obligated to provide life and disability benefits by individually contracting an insurance in order to comply with such obligation.
Even though, the Pension Reform Law eliminated the AFP’s individual obligation regarding the coverage of casualties beginning on July 1, 2009, by awarding the life and disability administration to a group of insurers, the obligation of those casualties pending payment due to temporary disability under coverage as of June 30, 2009, will remain in Provida.
At the moment that the final disability determination is made, the AFP is obligated to cover any shortfall equivalent to the difference between a participant’s savings in his/her individual capitalization account and the benefits granted to him/her by law. These benefits relate to the present value of the life annuity pension discounted by the life annuity rates in force at the time of the payment. Such pension will be equivalent to a percentage of the participant’s average taxable remuneration for the last ten years depending on the decrease of his/her working capacity: i.e., 50% of his/her taxable income in case of experiencing a loss of between one-half and two-thirds of working capacity, and 70% of his/her taxable income in case of experiencing a loss of more than two-thirds of working capacity. As a result, changes in interest rates impact the final value of an AFP’s payment obligations.
According to the insurance contract still in force maintained by Provida with BBVA Seguros de Vida entered into before the implementation of the Pension Reform Law, the Company has the obligation to make additional premium payments if the casualty costs are greater than the temporary payments, up to a maximum amount previously defined. The risk of a greater casualty cost and its consequent effect on the Company’s expenses from operations is subject beginning on July 1, 2009 to the returns of life annuities and pension funds, factors that have an inverse relationship in the economic cost of casualties, therefore, the Administrator could be forced to pay additional contributions if the evolution of such factors negatively affect.
Provida requested BBVA Seguros de Vida, in conformity with the new regulation, to value reserves at the prevailing market interest rate instead of an historical interest rate (defined as the minimum interest rate of the previous semester) so that the Company’s liability would more accurately reflect the amount that will be effectively paid (i.e. fair value). Moreover, by mutual consent of the parties (previous compensation to the insurer for change in conditions) the financial performance of cash flows surplus was modified with a benchmark determined by assets of similar duration to that of the insurance liability.
In view of changes made in the management of assets and liabilities associated with the life and disability insurance, AFP Provida has mitigated the risk associated with interest rate fluctuation.
Finally, the Company continues recording its obligations for this concept at fair value in accordance with the casualty model that considers the future evolution of relevant variables under conservative scenarios, which might include constituting higher provisions than those required by law that correspond to the surplus of the insurers’ balance sheets. Provida has recorded a gain in its provisions for unfavorable casualty rate by MCh$4,047 as of December 31, 2012, due to the higher speed of payments of casualty claims with respect to the expected (implying a minor sensibility regarding interest discount rates) accompanied by a decrease in the average cost per casualty.
Provida is exposed to the credit risk of the insurers such that the risk of failure of an insurer to pay any required shortfall amount is borne by Provida
Under the Pension Reform Law, the Pension Fund Administrators together must purchase insurance for their affiliates, called life and disability insurance (SIS). The right to provide such insurance is awarded through a bidding process, which is carried out by all AFPs.
In the case of bankruptcy of all involved insurance companies, the State guarantees the necessary additional contributions to complete the required amount to finance the life and disability pension through the State guarantee. The coverage of such guarantee is from 100% of the prevailing minimum pension and 75% over the excess of the pension with a maximum of UF 45 per month (MCh$1 approximately) for each beneficiary or pensioner.
Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida S.A. is a corporation formed under the laws of Chile. Its deed of incorporation was executed on March 3, 1981 and was registered in the Registry of Commerce in Santiago of Chile on April 6, 1981, under number 6,060, subsection 3,268. Provida’s by-laws specify that the Company shall have a duration of one hundred years, beginning on the date on which its existence was authorized. Provida’s registered office is located at 100 Pedro de Valdivia Avenue, 16th floor, Providencia, Santiago, Chile. Provida’s telephone number at that location is (56-2) 2351-1200 and its website is www.bbvaprovida.cl.
Provida is one of the oldest private pension fund administrators operating in Chile, maintaining a leading position in the Chilean private pension industry since its incorporation. As of December 31, 2012, according to official statistics released by the Superintendency of Pensions, Provida was the largest of the six AFPs operating in Chile in terms of the number of participants, contributors, assets under management, participants’ salary base and number of branch offices. The Chilean private pension system was created in May 1981, when Decree Law 3,500 of November 13, 1980 (the “Pension Law”) was implemented to replace the prior social security system. Subsequently, on March 11, 2008 the Pension Reform Law was promulgated in order to improve the pension system, reinforcing the solidarity character of the system, extending its coverage, increasing competitiveness in the industry and boosting gender equality.
At the end of the 1990s and in order to reinforce its competitive position, Provida, like other major AFPs, engaged in a merger process with smaller and less efficient AFPs, in an attempt to increase market share and achieve greater economies of scale. Provida purchased and merged with AFP Unión S.A and AFP Protección S.A. in 1998 and 1999, respectively. Provida has sustained an increase in its market share through these acquisitions with growth in its market shares from 29% before the mergers to 37% in 2012 in terms of participants and from 20% to 28% in 2012 in terms of total assets under management.
Since 1993 Provida has participated in establishing private pension systems in other countries in Latin America, achieving at the end of the 1990s equity interests in AFPs in Peru, Ecuador, Mexico, El Salvador and Colombia through its subsidiary, Provida Internacional. In 1999, the BBVA Group purchased a controlling interest in Provida and since 2001 the Company has participated with BBVA Group under a joint strategy to boost the aggregate pension holdings in Latin America.
In 2001 Provida Internacional sold its interest in the Mexican company AFORE Profuturo S.A. de C.V., a sale that allowed Provida to complete the consolidation of its strategic position in Mexico, along with the BBVA Group after the purchase of a 7.50% equity interest in AFORE Bancomer S.A. de C.V. (“AFORE Bancomer”). Additionally, in September 2001, Provida became the owner of 100% of the shares of AFP Génesis S.A., which had a leading position in the Ecuadorian fund management industry. Since then, AFP Génesis’ financial statements have been consolidated with those of Provida.
In 2003, Provida sold its equity interest in AFPC Porvenir S.A. in Colombia to the Sarmiento Group, the controlling shareholder of such administrator. This decision was based on the fact that the Colombian market had matured and was undergoing changes in regulations and the fact that Provida did not have management control of the company while the BBVA Group had a controlling position in another administrator, AFPC Crecer. In conjunction with the above transaction, Provida acquired a 100% equity interest in AFP Porvenir S.A. in the Dominican Republic from the Sarmiento Group and the minority shareholders with the expectation of the future merger with BBVA Crecer, the AFP of the BBVA Group in that country.
In May 2004, Provida sold its 30.00% equity interest in AFP Porvenir in the Dominican Republic to the local investor Progreso Group retaining a 70.00% equity interest to carry out the merger process between AFP Porvenir and BBVA Crecer, in which the BBVA Group held a 70.00% equity interest. Following the merger, Provida and the BBVA Group each held a 35.00% equity interest in AFP Porvenir and the remaining 30.00% was held by the Dominican financial investor Progreso Group. Also in October 2004, Provida Internacional sold its equity interest in AFP Crecer in El Salvador to Fondo Universal S.A. de C.V, a disposal that was triggered by moderate growth perspectives for that mature market.
In 2007, Provida Internacional sold 10.00% of its equity interest in BBVA Crecer AFP S.A. to one of the companies of the Vicini Group, retaining a 25.00% equity interest in such AFP. In December 2007, Provida Internacional sold the remaining 25.00% equity interest to the Bank of Nova Scotia of Canada, as a result of which Provida Internacional no longer has an equity interest in that company.
On May 24, 2012, the ultimate parent of AFP Provida, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (“BBVA S.A.”), disclosed it had decided to initiate a study of strategic alternatives for its mandatory pension business in Latin America. Among the alternatives considered were the sale of all or part of the AFPs in Chile, Colombia and Peru, and the Administradora de Fondos Para el Retiro (Administrator of Retirement Funds) AFORE in Mexico.
In connection with this process, in November 2012, Provida Internacional agreed to sell its entire 7.5% stake in BBVA S.A.’s Mexican affiliate Administradora de Fondos Para el Retiro Bancomer, S.A. de C.V. (“AFORE Bancomer”), to AFORE XXI Banorte, S.A. de C.V. The closing of this transaction occurred on January 9, 2013. As determined by resolution of Provida Internacional's Board of Directors and Extraordinary Shareholders’ meeting dated both as of November 27, 2012, this transaction was considered favorable to Provida’s interests, both from an economic point of view and in consideration of the purpose and core business for which Provida Internacional was incorporated. Provida Internacional's Board of Directors and Extraordinary Shareholders’ meeting concluded that its investment in AFORE Bancomer had over time become a passive investment. For this reason and considering future projections for AFORE Bancomer as well as other factors, the proposed sale to AFORE XXI Banorte, S.A. de C.V. of Provida Internacional's 7.5% stake in AFORE Bancomer was deemed by Provida Internacional's Board of Directors and Extraordinary Shareholders’ meeting to be in the best interests of the company.
Regarding local investments, Provida became a shareholder of Investment DCV in 1993, a company whose main purpose is to invest in entities engaged in offering securities to the public and in which Provida currently holds a
23.14% equity interest.
Since 2000, Provida has been a shareholder in PreviRed.com (“PreviRed”), a company that provides electronic collection services for pension contributions. Provida currently holds a 37.87% equity interest in PreviRed.com.
In 2002 a consortium composed of AFPs Provida, Habitat, Cuprum, Capital and Planvital was awarded the administration of Unemployment Insurance through a new company called Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía de Chile S.A. (“AFC”), in which Provida holds a 37.80% equity interest, for a period of 10 years. It is noteworthy that in April 2012, the second bidding process regarding the administration of the unemployment insurance was carried out, being awarded to the Grupo Nueva Providencia II, a group composed of AFP Cuprum, AFP Capital, AFP Planvital and BBVA Rentas e Inversiones Limitada. This new group is expected to begin operations in July 2013.
Recent developments |
Subsequently, in January 2013, Provida Internacional approved the sale of its entire 15.87% stake in BBVA’s Peruvian affiliate Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Horizonte S.A. (“AFP Horizonte”), to a company in the BBVA Group to be designated by BBVA S.A. This transaction was consummated over the Lima Stock Exchange via a trade effected on February 27, 2013 with BBVA S.A.'s affiliate Corporación General Financiera S.A. The sale of Provida Internacional’s interest in AFP Horizonte was approved by Provida Internacional's Board of Directors and Extraordinary Shareholders’ meeting both dated as of January 23, 2013, because it was considered to be in the corporate interests of AFP Provida and Provida Internacional, both economically and in consideration of the purpose and core business for which Provida Internacional was incorporated. Provida Internacional's Board of Directors and the Extraordinary Shareholders’ meeting concluded that its investment in AFP Horizonte had over time become a passive investment. As this was a related party transaction for Provida Internacional and Provida Internacional is a subsidiary of a publicly held corporation, the rules established by the Companies Law with respect to the conduct of related party transactions were followed. In particular, an independent third-party valuation was obtained, and the transaction was reviewed by AFP Provida’s management and Board of Directors and approved by the Extraordinary Shareholders’ meeting of Provida Internacional.
On February 1, 2013, the Agreement was executed by and among Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. and BBVA Inversiones S.A., on the one hand, as sellers, and on the other hand, as purchasers, members of the MetLife Group. Pursuant to, and subject to the terms and the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Agreement, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., will sell to the MetLife Group the total direct and indirect stake it holds in Provida.
Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth therein, one or more wholly-owned Chilean members of the MetLife Group are currently expected to commence, both in Chile and the United States of America, a tender offer in cash for the purchase of 100% of the 331,316,623 issued and outstanding shares of Provida, extended to all holders thereof. Also, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth therein, BBVA S.A. is currently expected to transfer to the MetLife Group (partially directly through the MetLife tender offer and partially through the sale to MetLife Group of Inversiones Previsionales S.A. following the expiration of the tender offer), the entirety of BBVA S.A.’s directly and indirectly-held approximately 64.3% interest in Provida.
The obligation of the applicable member(s) of the MetLife Group to commence the Provida Offer and to close the transactions contemplated by the Agreement, is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including receipt of regulatory approvals in Chile and Ecuador. Pursuant to Chilean law, the Directors of Provida must issue, at an appropriate time, an informed decision about the fairness of the tender offer for the shareholders of Provida.
The tender offer described here and elsewhere in this Form 20-F has not yet commenced. The description contained in this Form 20-F is for informational purposes only and is not an offer to buy or the solicitation of an offer to sell any securities. At the time the tender offer is commenced, it shall be conducted in accordance with applicable law in Chile and the United States, and MetLife, Inc. or one or more of its wholly-owned affiliates will, to the extent required, file a tender offer statement on either Schedule TO with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) (and such documentation as may be required to be filed with applicable government authorities in Chile), and Provida will, to the extent required, file a solicitation/recommendation statement on Schedule 14D-9 (and such documentation as may be required to be filed with applicable government authorities in Chile) with respect to the tender offer. Investors and holders of Provida shares are strongly advised to carefully read the tender offer statement (including the offer to purchase, the letter of transmittal (or Chilean equivalent, if applicable) and the related tender offer documents) and the related solicitation/recommendation statement when they become available, as they will contain important information, including the various terms of, and conditions to, the tender offer. Once filed, investors and holders of AFP Provida shares will be able to obtain free copies of these documents and other documents filed by BBVA, AFP Provida and MetLife, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the website of the Commission at www.sec.gov. In addition, the solicitation/recommendation statement and related materials may be obtained for free when they become available from MetLife, Inc. or Provida.
Capital expenditures and divestitures
In 2012, 2011, and 2010, aggregate capital expenditures totaled MCh$11,341 (approximately MUS$24) and divestitures totaled MCh$4,211 (approximately MUS$9) as follows:
In 2012, capital expenditures were MCh$4,381 related to investments in property, plant and equipment made in the ordinary course of business, mainly related to construction and real estate, and purchase of computer equipment and software. Likewise, capital divestitures were MCh$3,247 and were related to sales of property, plant and equipment mainly construction and real estate.
In 2011, capital expenditures were MCh$3,670 related to investments in property, plant and equipment made in the ordinary course of business, specifically the installation and restructuring of branch offices, and purchase of computer equipment and software. Capital divestitures were MCh$911 and were related to sales of property, plant and equipment mainly real estate.
In 2010, capital expenditures were MCh$3,290 related to investments in property, plant and equipment made in the ordinary course of business, specifically the implementation of the Top One office restructuring project, purchase of computer equipment and software, and purchase of land. Capital divestitures were MCh$53 and were related to sales of property, plant and equipment, mainly land and office fixtures.
The following table sets out information corresponding to capital expenditures and divestitures for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:
For years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Capital Expenditures | (4,381 | ) | (3,670 | ) | (3,290 | ) | ||||||
Divestitures | 3,247 | 911 | 53 |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions
Principal activities
Chilean AFPs are regulated by Law Decree 3,500 and by the Superintendency of Pensions. In order to commence operations, an AFP must hold a minimum capital equal to UF 5,000 (approximately ThUS$240), which increases based on the number of participants up to UF 20,000 (approximately ThUS$950) for AFPs with over 10,000 participants. The Administrators must maintain at all times shareholders’ equity equal to at least the minimum capital
required. If shareholders' equity of an AFP is reduced to an amount lower than the minimum required, the AFP shall be required to make up the difference within six months every time that this occurs. If an AFP is not able to do so, the Superintendency of Pensions would revoke the AFP’s authorization of existence and liquidate it.
The AFPs are required by law to be single-purpose companies authorized to provide the following services: |
- | collection and management of contributions made by participants; |
- | investments of participants’ contributions in pension funds managed by the AFP; |
- | provide life and disability benefits for participants; and |
- | provide a senior pension for participants. |
Services of collection and management of contributions made by participants |
The services provided by the AFPs in connection with collection and management of contributions include mandatory contributions and voluntary contributions made by its participants.
Regarding mandatory contributions and in accordance with the Pension Law, each dependent worker and participant of Provida must contribute 10% of his/her taxable salary into his/her individual capitalization account. Such contributions are deducted from the participant’s salary and are used to purchase shares of some of the five types of funds that Provida manages. These funds are legal entities separate from Provida as Administrator.
The Pension Reform Law established the requirement for self-employed workers to make contributions of 10% of their remunerations. Such requirement became effective beginning on January 1, 2012 and from that date onward, self-employed workers must gradually make contributions based on a 10% out of 40% of their salary in 2012, 10% out of 70% of their salary in 2013 and 10% of their total salary during 2014, equating to the contribution of dependent workers. However, for each of these years, the self-employed worker may waive this requirement if he expressly declares. Commencing on January 1, 2015, there is an obligation to make contributions based on 100% of the salary without the possibility of waiving. Additionally, the new regulation incorporated the concept of a “voluntary participant”, which refers to any individual who does not engage in a remunerated activity but decides to make pension contributions for his/her retirement.
Provida collects monthly mandatory contributions that are withheld from the salaries of Provida’s participants by their employers and those contributions from Provida’s self-employed participants and voluntary participants. Those monthly contributions are credited into each participant’s individual capitalization account. In the case of dependent workers, each employer must provide Provida with a monthly payroll listing all its employees who are participants of Provida, identifying the payments being made on behalf of each employee for pension contributions, both mandatory and voluntary. Self-employed workers prepare and submit their own payrolls. The voluntary participants may prepare their own payrolls or another person may do so on their behalf. In order to expedite the preparation, dependent workers whose spouses are voluntary participants, can grant authorization to their employers to deduct the contributions to be added to their spouses’ from their salaries. In all cases, the payroll, along with the checks or cash for the total contribution, must be submitted to any Provida branch office or any designated collection agent. Checks and cash deposited in banks and payrolls are submitted to the operational center in the city of Santiago for processing. Each AFP also administers an individual and private indemnity account in the fund for household workers (such as housekeepers).
Provida offers its participants the option to establish a voluntary savings account into which they may deposit additional funds to be invested in the elected pension fund. Because this voluntary account is not designated as pension savings but free disposal, the participant may make deposits into his/her account as often as desired and is able to make withdrawals up to six times a year with no amount restriction. Currently, Provida charges a variable fee of 0.92% per month on an annual basis over the administered funds. This account is kept open in the pension fund registers, regardless of its account balance status.
Finally and in connection with voluntary pension savings, these correspond to additional amounts of contributions that each worker may add to improve his future pension. The maximum voluntary monthly contribution with associated tax benefits is UF 50 (approximately US$2,380). If these funds are withdrawn for uses other than pension, the amount withdrawn will be charged a higher tax rate applicable to each particular case.
AFPs are entitled to charge a fee over funds of voluntary pension savings and for collection of such funds for other institutions. Currently, Provida charges a monthly fee equivalent to 0.56% on an annual basis over accumulated funds and has established a fee of Ch$1,250 (approximately US$2.60) for fund transfers collected for other financial institutions.
As a way to improve the volume of participants’ contributions and therefore the coverage of the private system, the Pension Reform Law incorporates the alternative of Collective Voluntary Pension Savings (“APVC” in its Spanish acronym) that corresponds to a contract to be agreed between the employer and his workers and the AFP or an authorized institution. This APVC is financed in a joint manner, because the employers agree to contribute a percentage of the savings made by employees who voluntarily select this modality. The conditions of the APVC administration contract are agreed between the employer and the AFP or the authorized institution. In order to promote this modality, tax incentives have been established for workers.
Investment services for participants’ contributions in the pension funds |
The general investment policy of the pension funds is determined by Provida’s Board of Directors. In the process of management’s investment decisions, the following committees of Provida are involved:
- Committee of Investment and Conflict of Interest Resolution of AFP Provida’s Board of Directors. This committee consists of three directors; two of them must be “autonomous” according to the criteria established in the Pension Reform Law, the President being one of the autonomous directors. Among its functions are, among others: to design an investment policy and a risk profile for each fund type; to supervise the fulfillment of the investment policy approved by the Board of Directors and the investment limits of pension funds established by law; to review objectives, policies and procedures to and from the administration of the investment risk in the pension funds; to examine information regarding operations of the pension funds with derivative instruments, foreign investments (equities, fixed income and currencies) and related companies and to approve investments in any new kind of asset.
- Committee of Investments and Risks: this is comprised of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Investment Officer, Risk Manager and other executives that might be designated. Among the responsibilities and attributions of this committee are, among others: to review the different measures of risk-return presented by the Risk Management; to approve different issuers, counterparts, mutual funds agencies and agents, among others, proposed by the Investment Management Area; to take notice of any event or contingency that might affect the equity of pension funds and to review situations associated with penalties and warnings; among others.
The organizational structure and the clear definition of the powers vested, attributions and responsibilities play an important role in the investment process. The structure is designed to fully develop the staff’s abilities and the optimum implementation of the investment policy in order to reach the proposed goals, managing the complexity of different instruments and markets in which the different type of funds are invested in, and the appropriate management of financial and operative risks faced by them.
For this, the responsible party for asset management is the Investment Area that has the Variable Income management division, the Fixed Income management division, the Alternative Assets & Strategy management division; and Middle Office Deputy management, all of whom report directly to the Chief Investment Officer. These Units include full-time research analysts with experience in investments, economics and securities. Provida also receives external advisory services provided by domestic and international consultants who provide advice to the Investment Area on trends and developments affecting the value of current and potential investments.
In Chile, all secondary market trading by AFPs must be executed in the formal trading markets either through a securities exchange or a competitive bidding process. Provida’s Department of Administration and Valuation, which is part of the Back Office Unit, both of which belong to the Company’s Planning and Control Division, validates investments each day before entering into them. Additionally, this unit has the obligation of disclosing to the Superintendency of Pensions a daily report with all investment activities.
It is important to note that since 2006, Provida has a quality certification in accordance with the ISO 9001-2000 Norm, which has been renewed periodically. The last renewal was made in December 2012 and includes the period between January 2, 2013 and January 1, 2016 provided that surveillance audits become
satisfactory. This certification includes investment processes made by the Money Market Desk, which is part of the Investment Area, and also tasks related to registration, valuation, custody, payment and control of investments executed by the Back Office Unit, as part of the Planning and Control Division; as well as tasks performed by the Accounting Pension Fund Department, which is part of the Pension Account Division. The Middle Office Deputy management is also included, belonging to the Investments Area, which acts as an intermediary and coordinator between the Money Market Desk and the Back Office Unit and the Financial Risk Deputy management, reporting to the Risk Division, which is responsible for establishing principles, operation and general guidelines in terms of good practices that AFP Provida should adopt in relation to managing their risks.
The general objective of Provida’s investment activity is to administer the investment portfolios composed of the participants’ contributions in order to obtain the highest possible return for the level of risk and terms of these participants’ profiles. For this and according to the current regulation, the participants have five fund types, which seek to maximize the expected pension value according to their specific risk profiles.
To aid the participants in making the best choice, Provida seeks to ensure that at all times, the five fund types (fund Type A, B, C, D and E) have clear differences among them regarding potential risk and returns. These differences are limited by the current regulations, including the requirement of a minimum return.
The main difference among the different fund types, as stipulated in the regulation, is the proportion invested in variable income securities. Fund Type A has the highest concentration allowed in variable income securities with a maximum of 80%; fund Type B has a maximum concentration of 60%; fund Type C has a maximum concentration of 40%; fund Type D has a maximum concentration of 20% and fund Type E (begun in October 2008) has the lowest concentration with a maximum of 5%.
The regulation establishes several restrictions regarding the investment activities that can be developed by each fund to guarantee the maintenance of such differences among the funds according to the risk of variable income securities permitted for each of them.
The investment philosophy behind the five fund types is to combine the highest possible diversification with low costs and a high degree of transparency. These principles must always be observed when making and implementing investment decisions.
The Pension Reform Law increased the range allowed for AFPs to make investments abroad, from a range between
30% to 45% to a range between 30% to 60% during the first twelve months following the enactment of the Pension Reform Law (from October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009); and between 30% to 80% since the thirteenth month (October 1, 2009). In September 2008, the Central Bank gradually increased the maximum investments limits abroad: 45% from October 1, 2008, 50% from December 1, 2008, 55% from April 1, 2009 and 60% from August 3, 2009. In November 2010, the Central Bank again increased the maximum global investment limit abroad from 60% to 80%, gradually increasing as follows: 65% from December 1, 2010, 70% from March 1, 2011, 75% from June 1, 2011 and 80% from September 1, 2011.
The table below summarizes the Pension Reform Law’s ranges for foreign investments per each Type of Fund: |
Investment ranges in foreign investments per each Type | ||
October 1, 2008 – September 30, 2009 | October 1, 2009 onwards | |
Fund Type A | 25% - 80% | 45% - 100% |
Fund Type B | 20% - 70% | 40% - 90% |
Fund Type C | 15% - 60% | 30% - 75% |
Fund Type D | 10% - 30% | 20% - 45% |
Fund Type E | 5% - 25% | 15% - 35% |
The maximum foreign investment limits per each Fund Type determined by the Central Bank beginning December, 2010 are as follows:
Fund Type | |||||
A | B | C | D | E | |
December 1, 2010 | 85% | 75% | 65% | 35% | 30% |
March 1, 2011 | 90% | 80% | 70% | 40% | 35% |
June 1, 2011 | 95% | 85% | 75% | 45% | 35% |
September 1, 2011 | 100% | 90% | 75% | 45% | 35% |
The Pension Law also distinguishes among the age and gender of the individuals who may elect to participate in the different fund Types. A description of the requirements to participate in each of the funds is detailed as follows:
Multiple funds allowable selections | |||
Men up to 55 years old and women up to 50 years old | Men from 56 years old and women from 51 years old not retired | Retired participants | |
Fund Type A | Allowed | Not allowed | Not allowed |
Fund Type B | Allowed | Allowed | Not allowed |
Fund Type C | Allowed | Allowed | Allowed |
Fund Type D | Allowed | Allowed | Allowed |
Fund Type E | Allowed | Allowed | Allowed |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions
According to the Pension Law, if at the ages of 56 and 51, respectively, men and women who have their mandatory contribution and/or their indemnity account in fund Type A do not make any choice regarding the destination of their mandatory pension funds, such funds are gradually transferred to fund Type B.
Moreover, if the participant does not voluntarily choose a fund, the mandatory contributions are assigned and modified by law according to the participant’s age:
- | Contributions made by men and women younger than 35 are to fund Type B; |
- | Contributions made by men between 36 and 55 and women between 36 and 50 to fund Type C; and |
- | Contributions made by men older than 56 and women older than 51 to fund Type D. |
For participants with programmed withdrawal, temporary income with deferred life annuities or immediate life annuities with programmed withdrawal plan, 100% of their savings are initially allocated to fund Type D. Thereafter, these participants may opt for any fund among the permitted alternatives.
After the creation of multiple funds, fund Type C managed by Provida continues to have the highest proportion of assets (44.2% at the end of 2012) while fund Types A, B and D managed by the Company have reached significant sizes after the voluntary changes and substantive transfers recorded from September 2002.
Assets under management of Provida | ||||||||||||||||
December 2002 | December 2012 | |||||||||||||||
MCh$ | % of the total | MCh$ | % of the total | |||||||||||||
Fund Type A | 112,692 | 1.1 | % | 3,155,441 | 14.3 | % | ||||||||||
Fund Type B | 1,177,690 | 11.7 | % | 3,706,486 | 16.8 | % | ||||||||||
Fund Type C | 7,346,323 | 73.2 | % | 9,763,979 | 44.2 | % | ||||||||||
Fund Type D | 1,016,124 | 10.1 | % | 3,833,777 | 17.4 | % | ||||||||||
Fund Type E | 395,863 | 3.9 | % | 1,619,582 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||
Total | 10,048,691 | 100.0 | % | 20,079,265 | 100.0 | % |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions
Under the Pension Law, each pension fund is a separate legal entity from the AFP, not affected in any way by the AFP’s financial situation. In the event of the AFP’s bankruptcy, the Superintendency of Pensions would assume control of the fund, allowing participants 90 days to transfer funds in their individual capitalization accounts to another AFP. At the end of this period, the fund custodian appointed by the Superintendency of Pensions would transfer all remaining accounts to another fund designated by the custodian.
The Pension Law establishes that each AFP must maintain a reserve for mandatory investments equal to 1% of the value of each pension fund under management. The mandatory investment is calculated in accordance with instructions issued by the Superintendency of Pensions, and corresponds to the value of each pension fund two days prior to calculation. Since June 1995, the Pension Law has required AFPs to invest this mandatory investment in
shares of the respective pension fund managed by the AFP. This legislation is intended to eliminate potential conflicts of interest that could arise between investment decisions relating to a portfolio held as the AFP’s reserves and those relating to the portfolio where pension funds are invested.
The mandatory investment’s purpose is to provide a guarantee in the event that the performance of a specific pension fund drops below the required minimum level of return. This requirement has been determined in accordance with the different portfolio compositions, requiring those with a greater investment in variable income securities and therefore potentially subject to higher volatility (funds Type A and B), a larger margin to achieve the requirement. As a consequence, for pension funds Type C, D and E, this level is the lesser of (a) the weighted average annual real return for the last 36 months of the same type of all pension funds in the system less 2% and (b) 50% of the weighted average annual real return for the last 36 months of the same type of all pension funds in the system. The minimum return for pension funds Type A and B is the lesser of (a) the weighted average annual real return for the last 36 months of the same type of all pension funds in the system less 4% and (b) 50% of the weighted average annual real return for the last 36 months of the same type of all pension funds in the system.
The Pension Reform Law includes an exception to the previous paragraph for those funds that have less than 36 months of operation. In these cases, such AFP will be liable to the fund to the extent that the weighted annual real return of funds Types A and B are less than the lesser of (a) the weighted average annual real return of all funds of the same type for the period equivalent to the operating months of the new fund, less 6%, and (b) 50% of the weighted average real return of all funds of the same type for the period equivalent to the operating months of the new fund type. In the case of pension funds Type C, D and E, the weighted average real return may not be less than the lesser of (a) the weighted average real return of all funds of the same type for the period equivalent to the operating months of the new fund, less 4 %, and (b) 50% of the weighted average real return of all fund types of the same type for the period equivalent to the operating months of the new fund type. The latter will not be applicable to the administrators with respect to any of their pension funds that have less than twelve operating months. The five funds currently managed by Provida have more than 36 months of operation.
The average annual real return is calculated by the Superintendency of Pensions according to a weighted formula established by the Pension Law which, among other provisions, limits the maximum participation of any AFP in the calculation. If for a certain month, the pension fund’s annual real return on investment falls below the minimum return required, the difference must be covered by the mandatory investments. If the resources from mandatory investments are applied and the minimum return is still not reached, the Chilean Government will have to make up the difference.
In the event that the pension funds managed by an AFP fail to fulfill the required minimum level of investment return, the AFP is required to cover the difference within five days of such determination by the Superintendency of Pensions. If reserves are used to fund any deficit in the required level of return, the AFP must replenish them within fifteen days. If a deficit is not covered or if reserves are not replenished, the AFP will be liquidated by the Superintendency of Pensions.
As of and for all periods presented, the Company has complied with the minimum reserve and minimum return requirements.
Services of granting life and disability benefits
The Pension Reform Law eliminated the individual responsibility of AFPs in connection with the life and disability insurance, by establishing that the AFPs altogether should purchase a fixed and single insurance premium through a bidding process to cover this obligation. Such insurance is awarded to one or more insurance companies, providing the best economic offer (See “Item 3—Key Information — Recent regulatory changes”).
Additionally, through the Pension Reform Law, a solidarity pension system financed by the resources of the State, which began granting benefits on July 1, 2008, was created to complement the existing private pension system. The solidarity pension system grants, among other benefits, basic solidarity pensions for disability and solidarity pension contributions for disability. To have these benefits, certain requirements must be met:
- | Basic solidarity pension for disability: being declared disabled by a Medical Commission designated by the Superintendency of Pensions; not being eligible to receive any pension under any pension regime; being between 18 and 65 years of age; being part of a family group belonging to the 60% of the poorest population in Chile and demonstrating residence in Chile for a period of not less than five years in the last six years prior to the submission of the request. |
- | Solidarity pension contribution for disability: being declared disabled by a Medical Commission designated by the Superintendency of Pensions; being affiliated with the Pension System established by the 3,500 Law Decree of 1980; not receiving a pension from any other pension regime; being between 18 and 65 years of age; being part of a family group belonging to the 60% of the poorest population in Chile; demonstrating residence in Chile for a period of not less than five years in the last six years prior to the submission of the request and being eligible for a disability pension, provided that the sum of the amount of such pension plus any other pension received from such system is less than the basic solidarity pension of disability. |
The solidarity system is administered by the Social Pension Institute, which has the right to grant, terminate, suspend or modify benefits, when applicable. Additionally, it regulates requests for processing, the operations and benefit payments of the solidarity system, adding the necessary regulations for its application and operation. However, current participants in the private pension system are able to submit requests regarding the solidarity pension system via the AFP (such as Provida) to which they belong, which in turn submits the request to the Social Pension Institute.
Services of granting senior pension benefits |
As required by the Pension Law, each AFP must provide specific senior pension benefits to their participants who meet the legal age requirement: 60 years of age for women and 65 years of age for men.
Participants meeting certain requirements can obtain senior pensions before the legal age. Such requirements were modified in 2004, in which over a term of 6 years the required percentages between the calculation of the anticipated pension over the average taxable remuneration of the last ten years and over the minimum legal pension gradually increased. The latter is intended to increase the level of pensions received and to restrain the trend of retirement before reaching the legal age, motivated by the possibility of receiving a permanent salary in case of unemployment or having two incomes (remuneration and pension).
The period (from/until) and the required percentages are described in the following table: |
Percentage over the taxable average remuneration | |
Period (from/until) | % |
August 19, 2004 – August 18, 2005 | 52% |
August 19, 2005 – August 18, 2006 | 55% |
August 19, 2006 – August 18, 2007 | 58% |
August 19, 2007 – August 18, 2008 | 61% |
August 19, 2008 – August 18, 2009 | 64% |
August 19, 2009 – August 18, 2010 | 67% |
From August 19, 2010 | 70% |
Percentage over the minimum pension requirement | |
Period (from/until) | % |
August 19, 2004 – August 18, 2005 | 110% |
August 19, 2005 – August 18, 2006 | 130% |
August 19, 2006 – August 18, 2007 | 140% |
From August 19, 2007 | 150% |
The Chilean Government guarantees a minimum level of senior pensions for all AFP participants who have contributed for at least 20 years (including any year contributed under the former system) having reached the retirement age stipulated by the law. In the event that the participant’s contributions into his/her individual capitalization account together with the amount paid pursuant to any recognition bond do not meet these minimum levels, the AFP pays the pension from the participant’s individual capitalization account until the account is depleted.
The solidarity pension system financed by Chilean State resources and incorporated through the Pension Reform Law, also grants benefits for the solidarity basic senior pensions and for the solidarity senior pension contributions. To obtain these benefits the participants must meet certain requirements:
Solidarity basic senior pension:
- | Being at least 65 years of age at the moment of the claim. |
- | Not being eligible for any pension under any pension regime either as a titular or as a beneficiary of a life disability. |
- | Demonstrating 20 years (continuous or discontinuous) of residence in Chile, accounted from the time the participant had reached 20 years of age and for a period of not less than four years of residence in the last five years prior to the submission of the request in order to obtain the benefits. |
- | Being part of a family group belonging to the poorest population in Chile in accordance with the coverage schedule mentioned below. |
As of July 1, 2012 the amount of the benefit was Ch$80,528 per month. This benefit will be automatically adjusted by 100% of the variation of inflation from the last 12 months since the last adjustment. When inflation exceeds 10% since the last adjustment, the adjustment will be made immediately, regardless of whether 12 months have passed or not.
Solidarity senior pension contribution
- | Being at least 65 years of age at the moment of the claim. |
- | Receiving a pension inferior to the maximum pension with solidarity contribution (PMAS). |
- | Not being a contributor in the Chilean police officers’ social security system (“Dipreca” in its Spanish acronym) or the Chilean armed forces social security system (“Capredena” in its Spanish acronym), or receiving pension under such regimes as a titular or beneficiary of a life pension. |
- | Demonstrating 20 years (continuous or discontinuous) of residence in Chile, calculated from the time the participant had reached 20 years of age and for a period of not less than four years of residence in the last five years prior to the submission of the request in order to obtain the benefits. |
- | Being part of a family group belonging to the poorest population in Chile in accordance with the coverage schedule mentioned below. |
Gradual Coverage of the benefits for Basic Pension and Solidarity senior pension contribution | |
Period | Coverage |
July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009 | 40% of the poorest population in Chile |
July 1, 2009 – August 31, 2009 | 45% of the poorest population in Chile |
September 1, 2009 – June 30, 2010 | 50% of the poorest population in Chile |
July 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011 | 55% of the poorest population in Chile |
From July 1, 2011 | 60% of the poorest population in Chile |
Amount and date of entrance PMAS | |
Period | Coverage |
In Ch$ | |
July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009 | 70,000 |
July 1, 2009 – August 31, 2009 | 120,000 |
September 1, 2009 – June 30, 2010 | 150,000 |
July 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011 | 200,000 |
July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2012 | 255,000 |
From July 1, 2012 | 261,758 |
At retirement, the participant chooses among four options for receiving his/her pension benefits: an immediate life annuity, a temporary income with deferred life annuity, a programmed withdrawal plan or an immediate life annuity with a programmed withdrawal plan.
- | Immediate life annuity: the participant selects a life insurance company, which pays the participant a monthly fixed income for the rest of his/her life in exchange for transferring the total amount in his/her individual capitalization account. Currently, for the participants that elect this alternative, the insurance company must offer a pension that is equal to or greater than the minimum seniority pension guaranteed by the State. From July 1, 2008, due to the Pension Reform Law, the life annuity must be equal to or higher than the basic solidarity senior pension applicable at the moment of retirement. |
- | Temporary income with deferred life annuities: the participant contracts with a life insurance company to start receiving life annuity plan benefits on a specific date in the future, immediately transferring the associated funds of such life annuity to the insurer. Likewise, the surplus to the temporary pension that covers the period from the moment when the participant selects his/her option until the annuity payments begin, is maintained in the individual capitalization account with the AFP. |
- | A programmed withdrawal plan: the participant keeps his/her funds deposited in his/her individual capitalization account with the AFP and receives a monthly pension in accordance with a pre-established formula that considers the historical pension fund return and the rates offered by the insurance companies, as well as the participant’s life expectancy. The amount of the participant’s monthly pension under the programmed withdrawal plan is recalculated every twelve months based on the surplus amount in the individual capitalization account of the participant and the variables described above. In the event that such amount falls below the minimum pension level, the Government’s guarantee becomes enforceable, if applicable. If the participant chooses a programmed withdrawal plan, it is possible to switch him/her to a life annuity plan. However, if a participant elects to transfer savings from his/her individual capitalization account to a life insurance company to receive life annuity benefits, the participant may no longer return to the programmed withdrawal plan. |
- | Immediate life annuity with a programmed withdrawal plan: the participant contracts an immediate life annuity with a life insurance company financed with part of the balance maintained in his/her individual capitalization account, allocating the remaining balance to the programmed withdrawal plan. In this case, the pension would correspond to the sum of the amounts received from each modality. The participants allowed to opt for this modality, should be able to obtain an immediate life annuity equal to or higher than the minimum seniority pension guaranteed by the State (with the Pension Reform Law, the life annuity must be equal to or higher than the basic solidarity senior pension). |
All pension obligations that an AFP must pay through programmed withdrawals from the individual capitalization account are expressed in shares of pension funds and translated to UF, being recalculated annually according to a formula established by law that considers the new balance of the account, adding the pension funds returns and the interest rate of annuities. Insurance annuity amounts are expressed in UF and are thus indexed to reflect the impact of inflation. The AFP has no financial obligations once the annuity is purchased. In the case of the bankruptcy of companies providing insurance annuities, the Chilean Government guarantees 100% of this obligation up to the legal minimum pension amount per month and 75% of the pensions over the minimum pension up to UF 45 (approximately US$2,140).
Additionally, a participant who has been affiliated with the pension system for at least 10 years, may withdraw part of the balance of his/her individual capitalization account and freely use the surplus provided that he/she is able to obtain a pension from his/her pension funds equal to or superior to 70% of his/her average taxable remuneration and equal to or superior to 150% of the legal minimum prevailing pension. Such surplus corresponds to the difference between the total pension savings in the participant’s capitalization account and the funds required to finance the highest value resulting from the application of the aforementioned requirements (70% of average taxable remuneration and 150% of the legal minimum pension). To calculate the requirement, the lowest rate between the average rate of the life annuities informed and the rate of programmed withdrawal of the fund where the participant has his/her account, is used.
With the Pension Reform Law, the right to withdraw the disposable surplus is now limited to those participants that have a pension superior or equal to 100% of the maximum pension with a solidarity contribution, and 70% of the average of remunerations received and salaries declared.
Primary revenues
(i) Fee income |
The most significant source of revenues from operations for Provida is the monthly fee charged to participants in connection with deposits into his/her individual capitalization account. Under the Pension Law, an AFP is permitted to charge a fee for:
- | Collection and administration of mandatory contributions; |
- | Pension payments of programmed withdrawals and temporary income; |
- | Collection and administration of voluntary savings; |
- | Management and transfer of voluntary pension savings to other entities, and |
- | Transfer of contributions made by voluntary participants. |
Provida currently charges fees for each of the above services (as do the other AFPs, except for AFP Habitat and AFP Modelo, which do not charge fees for transferring contributions of voluntary participants).
In accordance with the Pension Law, each AFP is allowed to set the fees it charges to its participants or pensioners. In connection with fees charged, the Pension Law establishes that each AFP must apply the same fee levels to each of its participants.
Although there is no legal limit on the fees that an AFP may charge, competitive pressures have limited the range of fees charged by AFPs.
The AFP earns fees in connection with the collection of contributions to participants’ individual capitalization accounts and the administration of such accounts. In 2012, out of the total of Provida’s revenues from operations, MCh$153,415 or 86.1% corresponded to fee income received for the service of administering accounts and ancillary services. Almost all of the fee income comes from charges levied on participants’ monthly mandatory contributions to their individual capitalization accounts.
Collection and administration of mandatory contributions |
Fee structure is one of the competitive variables of the AFP industry. With the implementation of the Pension Reform Law, the ability that each AFP has to determine whether to charge a fixed fee deducted from the pension fund has been eliminated. Consequently, each AFP may charge only a variable fee, which is a percentage of the salary used to calculate the mandatory pension contribution or a combination of both types of fees. Variable fees are charged as a percentage of a participant’s monthly taxable salary that is subject to a mandatory contribution of 10% of the salary base. In accordance with the Pension Reform Law, the maximum amount of taxable income should be adjusted in January of each year as per the variation of the real wage index as measured by the Chilean Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (National Statistics Institute). In January 2012, this maximum amount increased from UF 66.0 (MCh$1,51) to UF 67.4 (MCh$1,54) per month, and in January 2013 the amount was further adjusted to UF 70.3 (MCh$1,61).
For instance, if a participant receives a monthly salary of Ch$200,000 as a dependent worker, he/she must contribute Ch$20,000 to an AFP. Under Provida’s variable fee currently in force (1.54% of taxable remuneration), the total monthly fee collected in relation to that account would be a variable fee of Ch$3,080.
The requirement to charge a uniform fee to all participants has limited the AFPs’ flexibility to reward long-term or higher-income contributors with lower fees compared to those charged to newer and/or lower funds accounts. Although changes to this rule have been proposed on several occasions, Provida cannot ensure that a change will be adopted that would allow Provida to reward long-term or higher-income contributors through lower fees.
The fee structure for the years 2012, 2011 and 2010 is as follows: |
Monthly fees for mandatory contributions | |||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
Provida | 1.54% | 1.54% | 1.54% |
Industry High | 2.36% | 2.36% | 2.36% |
Industry Low | 0.77% | 1.14% | 1.14% |
Industry Average | 1.48% | 1.55% | 1.55% |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions
Pension payments of programmed withdrawals or temporary income |
With respect to fees charged for programmed withdrawals or temporary income, the Pension Reform Law authorizes the AFPs to charge only a variable fee over the pension paid. Currently, four AFPs charge a variable fee of 1.25%, while AFP Habitat charges a fee of 0.95% and AFP Modelo charges a fee of 1.20%.
Under this structure, the participant maintains his/her funds deposited in an individual capitalization account in the AFP and withdraws a monthly pension in accordance with a pre-established formula determined by law. In the event that such amounts fall below the minimum pension level, the Government’s guarantee applies, depending on the contribution level of participants. See “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Principal activities—Services of granting senior pension benefits.”
Collection and administration of voluntary savings |
The Pension Reform Law required a fee charge for the administration of voluntary savings accounts calculated as a percentage of the balance kept on such accounts. Currently, Provida charges a fee of 0.92%, while the rest of the AFPs’ fee charges are in the range of 0.60% to 0.95% per year.
Administration and transfer of voluntary pension savings |
The AFPs, like other authorized institutions, also offer participants the option to have a voluntary pension savings account, in which they can make monthly deposits previously determined to improve their future pensions. AFPs are allowed by law to charge a fee on assets under management, and fees currently range between 0.50% and 0.70% on an annual basis, and the fee charged by Provida is 0.56%. Fixed fees on fund transfers collected for other institutions can also be charged, currently ranging between Ch$1,100 and Ch$1,437 for each fund transfer (approximately US$2.29 and US$2.99). The current fee charged by Provida is Ch$1,250 (approximately US$2.60).
With the Pension Reform Law, the AFPs have the right to charge a fee for administering the collective voluntary pension savings and on the transfer of these savings deposits towards other administrators or authorized institutions. Fees for administration may be freely agreed between the employer and the AFP or the authorized institutions, allowing for different fees to be charged for different contracts. Additionally, different fees could be charged in relation to the same contract according to the number of workers incorporated in the plan.
Under no circumstance will an AFP be able to establish conditions to the affiliation or transfer of participants who are parties to a collective voluntary pension savings contract.
Transfer of contributions made by voluntary participants |
The AFPs have the right to charge a fixed fee for transferring contributions made by voluntary participants collected by the AFP, but whose destination is another AFP or authorized institution. Provida currently charges a fee of Ch$1,250 (approximately US$2.60) per operation, while the rest of the AFPs charge a fee between Ch$1,100 and Ch$1,144 (approximately US$2.29 and US$2.99). Two out of six AFPs in the industry, AFP Habitat y AFP Modelo, do not charge a fee for such service.
The fees can be changed at any time upon three months’ notice to participants, the Superintendency of Pensions and the public. The following table sets forth the fee rates charged by Provida for each of the services in the last three years:
Fee rates charged by Provida | ||||||||||||
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Variable fee on monthly mandatory contributions | 1.54 | % | 1.54 | % | 1.54 | % | ||||||
Monthly variable fee on payments of programmed withdrawals and temporary income | 1.25 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.25 | % | ||||||
Variable fee for voluntary savings accounts (annual basis over administered funds) | 0.92 | % | 0.92 | % | 0.92 | % | ||||||
Fee charged on voluntary pension savings: | ||||||||||||
Fixed fee per transfer (Ch$) | 1,250 | 1,250 | 1,250 | |||||||||
Variable fee for management (annual basis over administered funds) | 0.56 | % | 0.56 | % | 0.56 | % | ||||||
Fixed Fee for transfer contributions made by voluntary participants (Ch$) | 1,250 | 1,250 | 1,250 |
Fee rates charged by Provida | ||||||||||||
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Ratios of fees to total fee income: | ||||||||||||
Variable fee on mandatory contributions | 96.9 | % | 96.6 | % | 96.8 | % | ||||||
Variable fee on payments of programmed withdrawals or temporary income | 1.8 | % | 1.9 | % | 1.8 | % | ||||||
Variable fee on voluntary pension savings | 1.3 | % | 1.5 | % | 1.4 | % | ||||||
Fixed fee on voluntary pension savings transfers | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
Fixed fee on transfer of contributions made by voluntary participants | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % |
The AFPs charge fees on active accounts into which contributions are made. Accordingly, the numbers of contributors, as well as their average salaries, and not the number of participants, determine the monthly mandatory fee income of each AFP. In 2012, Provida had the largest average market share of contributors among all AFPs (34.8%).
(ii) Gains (losses) on mandatory investments |
Gains (losses) on mandatory investment (see “Item 4. —Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Principal activities—Investment services for participants’ contributions in pension funds”) represented 8.1%, -2.3% and 12.9% of Provida’s revenues from operations in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As detailed in the following tables, such returns have evolved in accordance with the performance of each of the pension funds, as well as the relative importance of each fund relative to the total assets under management.
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Gains (losses) on mandatory investment (in MCh$) | 14,515 | (3,469 | ) | 21,886 | ||||||||
Weighted average real returns of pension funds | 4.7 | % | -5.2 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||
Mandatory investments of pension funds (in MCh$) | 217,072 | 201,418 | 204,526 | |||||||||
% Mandatory investment’s participation in portfolio | 1.0 | % | 1.0 | % | 1.0 | % |
Gains (losses) on mandatory investments and real average returns for each fund | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains (losses) | Returns | Gains (losses) | Returns | Gains (losses) | Returns | |||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | % | MCh$ | % | MCh$ | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Fund Type A | 2,588 | 6.0 | % | (3,106 | ) | -11.6 | % | 4,956 | 11.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Fund Type B | 2,617 | 5.0 | % | (1,700 | ) | -8.0 | % | 4,878 | 11.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Fund Type C | 6,405 | 4.6 | % | (378 | ) | -4.2 | % | 9,314 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Fund Type D | 2,231 | 3.9 | % | 1,187 | 0.0 | % | 2,309 | 6.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Fund Type E | 674 | 3.2 | % | 528 | 4.2 | % | 429 | 5.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total | 14,515 | 4.7 | % | (3,469 | ) | -5.2 | % | 21,886 | 9.5 | % |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions.
Mandatory investment maintained in each fund and percentage of each fund in the total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mandatory Investment | Participation | Mandatory Investment | Participation | Mandatory Investment | Participation | |||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | % | MCh$ | % | MCh$ | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Fund Type A | 31,324 | 14.4 | % | 32,178 | 16.0 | % | 39,868 | 19.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Fund Type B | 36,773 | 17.0 | % | 35,629 | 17.7 | % | 39,690 | 19.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
Fund Type C | 95,326 | 43.9 | % | 89,593 | 44.5 | % | 90,871 | 44.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
Fund Type D | 37,772 | 17.4 | % | 33,762 | 16.7 | % | 28,800 | 14.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Fund Type E | 15,877 | 7.3 | % | 10,256 | 5.1 | % | 5,297 | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total | 217,072 | 100.0 | % | 201,418 | 100 | % | 204,526 | 100 | % |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions.
As shown in the tables above, fund Type C has the highest concentration of total administered assets. Additionally, the participation in the riskiest funds (funds Types A and B) has declined, likely reflecting the volatility exhibited over the
past two years, causing certain participants to prefer to take less risks, by moving themselves towards more conservative funds, and increasing participation in those funds established as less risky (funds Types D and E).
(iii) Other revenues |
Other revenues are mainly revenue from fees charged by the subsidiary AFP Génesis in Ecuador, for services rendered by Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía and fees recovered from other AFPs, which were MCh$9,350 or 5.2% of Provida’s revenues from operations in 2012. In addition, other revenues include the financial revenues of life and disability insurance for MCh$953 in 2012, representing 0.5% of Provida’s revenues from operations arising from the excess of cash flows of the insurer in view of premium payments made by the Company.
Primary expenses |
(i) Employee Expenses |
Employee expenses were MCh$32,157, equivalent to 46.6% of the total of Provida’s expenses from operations as of December 31, 2012. Wages and salaries of administrative personnel totaled MCh$18,381, equivalent to 57.2% of total employee expenses, while the administrative staff of 956 workers (annual average) represented 64% of the Company’s total staff during the year. Wages and salaries of sales personnel amounted to MCh$10,299, equivalent to 32.0% of the total of employee expenses, while the sales staff of 535 workers (annual average) represented 36% of the Company’s total workers. Short-term benefits to employees were MCh$1,854 equivalent to 5.8% of total employee expenses, and indemnities for cessation of labor relationship amounted to MCh$1,623 equivalent to 5.0% of total employee expenses.
(ii) Miscellaneous other operating expenses |
Miscellaneous other operating expenses were MCh$31,934 in 2012, representing 46.2% out of the total Provida’s operating expenses. This item is composed of: administrative expenses (real estate, telecommunications and services) equivalent to 71.8% of total miscellaneous other operating expenses, data processing expenses (maintenance, repair and liaison services) equivalent to 12.2% of total miscellaneous other operating expenses, other operating expenses (disability qualification costs and Board of Directors’ remunerations) representing 10.1% of total miscellaneous other operating expenses and marketing expenses (publicity and communications to clients) representing 5.9% of miscellaneous other operating expenses.
(iii) Depreciation and Amortization expenses |
Total depreciation and amortization expenses were MCh$8,676 in 2012, equivalent to 12.5% of total expenses from operations. The amortization expenses totaled MCh$6,241 and depreciation expenses were MCh$2,435.
(iv) Life and disability insurance premium |
The Chilean Pension Law previously required AFPs to individually purchase insurance to cover their obligation to provide life and disability benefits to their participants (see “Item 10. Additional information—C. Material contracts” and “Item 19. Exhibits—4.1 Life and disability insurance contract”). Beginning in July 2009 with the implementation of the Pension Reform Law, the requirement to provide the life and disability insurance was awarded to a group of insurers through a bidding process, having the same value for all the participants regardless of the AFP to which they contribute.
In the year 2009, the recurring expense for such concept was only recorded until the month of July, when the temporary premium of the contract with coverage between January 2005 and June 2009 and the provisions for higher casualty rate were recorded. In 2010, this item only included expenses related to the recovery of leftovers from previous coverage periods stemming from the last insurance contract, and provisions for unfavorable casualty rate due to changes in the value of payable casualties. In 2011, a gain was recorded as a result of reversals on provisions for unfavorable casualty rate stemming from the difference between the amount required as of December 2010 by using
the best available information, and the estimation made by Provida’s model as of December 2011. These lower provisions arise from lower expected discount rates at the moment of paying the casualties. A gain was also recorded in 2012 stemming from due to the higher speed of payments of casualty claims with respect to the expected (implying a minor sensibility regarding interest discount rates) accompanied by a decrease in the average cost per casualty.
Likewise, insurance regulations governing life and disability insurance policies instructed that casualties reserves should be determined at a market interest rate instead of historical rates (defined as the minimum of the previous semester) to contracts with coverage commencing in July 2009, giving the alternative to insurers to voluntarily apply such methodology to existing contracts. Provida requested that BBVA Seguros de Vida, adopt this new regulation for the January 2005-June 2009 contract so that the Company’s liability would more accurately reflect the amount that will be effectively paid (i.e. fair value). Moreover, by mutual consent of the parties (previous compensation to the insurer for change in conditions) the financial performance of cash flows surplus was modified with a benchmark determined by assets of similar duration than the liability of the insurance.
Because Provida’s insurance contract for coverage prior to July 2009 is in a runoff stage, Provida only maintains those casualties pending payment due to temporary disability period. The liability amount determined by the insurance company is recorded at the market interest rate and Provida continues applying its casualty model by determining the liability amount at forward rates at the moment of casualty payments.
In accordance with the Authority’s request, Provida recognizes the higher amount resulting from the calculated liability amount (from the insurance company) and the amount determined by its casualty model, thus the expense to be recognized depends on interest rate fluctuations.
The life and disability insurance premium was a gain in the amount of MCh$3,718 as of December 31, 2012, and MCh$2,326 as of December 31, 2011, while for the year ended December 31, 2010 expenses were recorded in the amount of MCh$2,338. See “Item 5. Operating and financial review and prospects—A. Operating results— Operating results for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011”.
Payments of benefits for the participant or his/her beneficiaries |
Before the Pension Reform Law became effective, if a participant died or became disabled before the legal age of retirement (65 years of age for men and 60 years of age for women) and had not accumulated sufficient funds in his/her individual capitalization account to provide the participant or his/her beneficiaries the benefits required by the Pension Law, the AFP had an obligation to make up for the shortfall to the participant’s account. Additionally, all AFPs were required to obtain individually an insurance policy with a licensed life insurer to provide coverage for this obligation. With the Pension Reform Law, women’s age became the same as men’s age (65 years old) to apply for these benefits and the individual requirement for the AFPs was eliminated beginning in July 2009 and AFPs are no longer liable for any shortfalls. See “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Principal activities—Services of granting life and disability benefits”.
Participants are eligible for the life and disability benefits provided that they are salaried workers who were contributing to an AFP at the time of the disability or death or they have made at least one contribution in the last year and that contribution was preceded by at least six monthly contributions in the last twelve months. Likewise, self-employed and voluntary participants are eligible for these benefits if they have made contributions in the month prior to the disability or death.
The Pension Reform Law established that self-employed workers would be gradually incorporated by requiring them to make mandatory contributions (See “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Principal activities—Services of collection and management of contributions made by participants”). Given the above, life and disability insurance coverage for self-employed workers that have made mandatory contributions will be subject to an annual taxable income equal to or superior to seven minimum monthly incomes, permitting them to have an annual coverage commencing on May 1 of the year in which contributions were made until April 30 of the following year. In those cases where the taxable income is inferior to the aforementioned requirement, the coverage will be proportionate to participants’ contributions.
Disability benefits are given to those participants who have been qualified as disabled by a Medical Commission designated by the Superintendency of Pensions. A participant is qualified as disabled if his/her working capacity is diminished by at least 50%, as follows:
- | Participants with a partial disability, defined as experiencing a loss of between one-half and two-thirds of their working capacity, are entitled to receive a pension equal to 50% of their prior income, which is defined as their monthly average taxable income for the last ten years, or for the latest period during which they worked, as adjusted for inflation. The entitlement to partial disability benefits has a temporary character and covers a three-year period beginning after the first disability determination. At the end of such period, the Medical Commission makes a second disability determination (final determination) and concludes whether the temporary disability continues, changes to a total disability status, or whether the participant is no longer disabled. |
- | Participants with total disability, defined as experiencing a loss of more than two-thirds of their working capacity, are entitled to receive a pension equal to 70% of their prior income. Under the Pension Reform Law effective from October 1, 2008, the partial disability status for total disability was eliminated, therefore, when the Medical Commission qualifies a participant as totally disabled, this determination will be considered as definitive and unique. |
Life benefits are granted to the legal beneficiaries of participants who have died before reaching the legal age of retirement. Benefits are established as a percentage of the participant’s prior income. The applicable percentage depends primarily on the family status of his/her beneficiaries: for a spouse with no children, the percentage is 42.0%; for a spouse with children, 35.0%, plus 10.5% for each child up to 18 years of age (until the age of 24 for students and until death for disabled children).
Before the implementation of the Pension Reform Law, if the disabled or deceased participant’s individual capitalization account did not have the amount of funds necessary to pay the pension stipulated by law, the insurers (under its contract with the AFPs) had to make up the shortfall in case of death or total disability. In the case of disability after the determination of partial disability (or total disability until October 2008), the AFP had to record a provision in order to settle the shortfall three years from when the final disability determination was made, taking into account the three years of temporary pension payments that would be received by the participant following the initial disability determination.
In order to determine the costs of the aforementioned benefits, the insurer made these calculations at the time of the initial disability determination, three years before the shortfall was paid and if it was required by the final disability determination, on the basis of the information available to it at that time, including current annuity rates and the amount of funds in the participant’s individual capitalization account. If a final disability determination was made, the insurer updated the amount of initial disability reserve based on the information available at such time.
As previously mentioned, with the implementation of the Pension Reform Law, the insurers receive a single premium for providing life and disability benefits , therefore the insurers are ultimately responsible for the associated payments.
Payments by Provida to the insurer |
Before modifications introduced by the Pension Reform Law and under the insurance policy in force until June 2009, Provida paid the insurer a temporary rate, equal to 1.00% of the aggregate taxable remuneration of all of Provida’s contributors, which was intended to provide the insurer a portion of the funds it would be required to pay to beneficiaries for life and disability benefits, which amounted to a monthly average (between June 2008 and June 2009) of MCh$6,150 for temporary premium. Also, Provida paid the insurer until June 2009 a monthly fixed management fee, which averaged (between June 2008 and June 2009) MCh$45 per month, a figure that is not considered as premium paid to the insurer for casualties of its participants.
Commencing in July 2009, the payments to the insurer regarding the life and disability insurance premium arising from processing residual and unprocessed contributions, corresponded to contributions made before July 2009. Such annual expense was MCh$649 in 2010, MCh$370 in 2011 and MCh$329 in 2012.
In the first quarter of each year until the close of each contract (48 months after the termination, extendable for two years upon mutual consent), Provida and the insurer compare the funds paid by the Company for the prior fiscal year under the temporary rate and true-ups to the sum of (i) the funds effectively accumulated and paid by the insurer to
participants or their beneficiaries and (ii) the estimated requirement by the insurer necessary to pay disabled participants once final disability determinations of disabled status have been made by the Medical Commission referred to above (the sum of (i) and (ii) is referred to herein as the total cost of casualties). If the casualty costs are greater than temporary payments, Provida must pay the insurer the difference, up to a maximum amount based on the maximum casualty rate (where the casualty rate is the quotient between the cost of casualties and the aggregate taxable remunerations of all of Provida’s contributors) established in the insurance contract that for 2009 was 1.70%. Provida has no obligation to pay the insurer for a casualty rate exceeding the maximum rate. Monthly premiums were paid during the entire contract’s term at a temporary premium of 1.00%. Provida’s participation in the surplus is 100% if the casualty rate is equal or lower than 1.70%. If the casualty rate is lower than the temporary rate, the insurer would reimburse the difference to the Company. For the fiscal year 2010, the provisions made by Provida regarding payments to the insurer (in March 2010) resulting from comparing the temporary rate and the accounted casualty costs, as well as additional provisions attributable to the application of the Company’s casualty model were MCh$1,689. For the fiscal year 2011, a gain in provisions for unfavorable casualty rate for MCh$2,696 was recorded due to the adjustments made when determining the difference between the amounts required as of December 2010 by using the best available information, and the estimation made by Provida’s model as of December 2011. These lower provisions arise from lower expected discount rates at the moment of paying the casualties. For the fiscal year 2012, a gain in provisions for MCh$4,047 was recorded due to the higher speed of payments of casualty claims with respect to the expected (implying a minor sensibility regarding interest discount rates) accompanied by a decrease in the average cost per casualty.
The last life and disability insurance contract with coverage from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2009 was entered into with BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. Under such contract, the maximum casualty rate expressed as a percentage of the contributors’ taxable remunerations initially amounted to 1.27%, with a monthly premium paid for the contract coverage period calculated at a provisional rate of 0.70%. The Company’s participation in the surplus will be 100% if the casualty rate is equal to or lower than the maximum rate of the contract, as calculated over the contributors’ taxable remunerations. Additionally, the contract established monthly payments to the insurance company calculated at a provisional rate of 0.70% applied to the total of remuneration and monthly taxable income of the contributors, plus a monthly fixed premium of UF 2,150 (MCh$49) during the coverage period of the contract. As a result of updating the mortality tables effective beginning in the year 2008 and the resulting impact in the higher costs in the insurance, upon mutual assent of the parties, in view of the changes in the economic conditions of the contract, the terms of the insurance contract were modified. Beginning in January 2008, the maximum casualty rate was 1.70% expressed as a percentage of the contributing contributors’ taxable remuneration, while the temporary rate was 1.00%, retaining the monthly fixed premium of UF 2,150 (MCh$49).
The insurance contract also contemplates yearly true-ups payable to the insurance company, for the difference between payments made by Provida (temporary premium and previous true-ups) and the total accounted cost of casualties (paid or accrued by the insurer) at each year end, which have taken place on March 31 of each year from 2006 onwards. Also, on that date monthly financial revenues will be paid, based on the value recorded at December 31 of the previous year, calculated by applying the rate of return established in the contract over the surplus of cash flow maintained by the insurer (total payments made by Provida minus casualties paid by the insurer).
The General Rule N°243 from the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance, ruling insurance companies, effective beginning on July 1, 2009, instructed that casualty reserves should be determined on a monthly basis at the market interest rate instead of the historical rate, giving the alternative to apply this methodology to insurance contracts previous to the implementation date of the rule. Provida requested that BBVA Seguros de Vida adopt such a rule. Consequently and given the impact of this over the administration of the insurance contract and the associated risks, by common agreement the parties modified the conditions of financial revenues. The above, considering that the rendering of life and disability insurance implies a mismatch risk between the assets and liabilities duration arising from such obligation.
The final settlement of this contract will occur 48 months after the expiration date of the coverage period as of June 30, 2009, i.e., June 2013, but can be extended for up to 2 years by mutual agreement.
The previous insurance policy was in force from August 1, 2003 to December 31, 2004 and was entered into with BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. The maximum casualty rate was 1.10%, expressed as a percentage of the contributing contributors’ taxable remunerations. Provida’s participation in the surplus was 100% if the casualty rate was equal to or lower than 1.10% and greater than 0.85% of the contributors’ taxable remunerations and 90% if the casualty rate was equal to or less than 0.85%. Additionally, the contract contemplated monthly payments calculated at a provisional rate of 0.70% applied to the total of remunerations and monthly taxable remunerations of the contributors and a monthly fixed premium of UF 2,150 for the contract coverage period. In March 2005, Provida began to make yearly true-up payments to the insurance company. The final settlement date of this contract was contemplated to occur on December 31, 2008, but it was extended by common agreement of the parties, and finally settled in April 2011.
The following table sets forth the cost of casualties, the payments to the insurance company and the provisions for unfavorable casualty rates of each insurance contract as of December 31, 2012:
Insurance Company | Period covered by the Contract | Costs for claims reported by the Insurance Company | Payments made to the Insurance Company (MCh$) | Provision at the date of the information provided by the Insurance Company | Gross Provision at the current year-end (not including financial revenues effects) (*) | ||
Date | MCh$ | To reported date | At 12-31-2012 | MCh$ | |||
BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. (**) | 08-2003 to 12-2004 | 04/30/2011 | 90,511 | 90,345 | 90,345 | - | - |
BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. (***) | 01-2005 to 06-2009 | 12/31/2012 | 370,642 | 371,068 | 371,068 | - | (1,727) |
Total | - | (1,727) |
(*) | BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. adopted General Rule N°243 effective beginning on July 1, 2009 allowing insurers to determine the casualty reserve for those life and disability insurance contracts with coverage period beginning before June 30, 2009, at a market interest rate on a monthly basis. This resulted in a decreased amount of reserves, as the reserves were determined at historical rates lower than the current ones. Likewise, by estimating that average market rates would be lower than the effective discount rate for the next three years, Provida has made a provision using the casualty rate calculated by its own model. |
(**) | The insurance contract subscribed with BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. from August 2003 to December 2004 coverage period ended in April 2011. The casualty rate of such policy exceeded the maximum rate of 1.10%. Consequently the excess of costs for MCh$157 was assumed by the insurer. |
(***) | Includes accrued premiums for a total amount of MCh$493 discounted from the balance payable to BBVA Seguros de Vida according to the respective contracts, but as the accrued premiums exceeded the balance, provisions for casualties are not required. |
Principal markets
As of December 31, 2012 there were 6 AFPs operating in Chile. The most recent incorporation was AFP Modelo, which in August 2010 started to render services to the new participants’ portfolio entering into the pension system, for a two-year term awarded in the bidding process carried out in February 2010. Additionally, there is another AFP, AFP Regional, which has been legally incorporated but has not yet begun operations.
As previously mentioned Provida is the largest and one of the oldest AFPs operating in Chile and has occupied a leading position in the private pension industry since its establishment.
Provida’s leading position is shown in the following table regarding market shares for the most relevant variables as of December 31, 2012:
Market Share for relevant variables, as of December 31, 2012 | ||||||
AFP | Pension Funds | Participants(*) | Contributors(*) | Revenues | Expenses | Profit |
Provida | 28.5% | 37.6% | 34.8% | 31.2% | 28.4% | 36.0% |
Habitat | 25.9% | 23.5% | 24.5% | 23.5% | 18.7% | 25.8% |
Capital | 21.6% | 20.7% | 20.4% | 20.9% | 30.7% | 14.8% |
Cuprum | 20.6% | 6.8% | 9.5% | 17.8% | 14.4% | 18.2% |
Planvital | 2.8% | 4.3% | 3.6% | 3.9% | 5.2% | 2.7% |
Modelo | 0.6% | 7.1% | 7.2% | 2.7% | 2.6% | 2.5% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions.
(*) Average market share for 2012.
In accordance with the Pension Law, no company in Chile other than an AFP may provide pension benefits of a similar nature, with the only exception that the management of voluntary pension savings and collective voluntary pension savings has been opened to other authorized institutions.
With the implementation of multiple funds, the industry incorporated a new competitive aspect given that the larger number of pension fund portfolios causes participants to require higher levels of information in order to make optimal decisions regarding their risk and age profiles, and thus the pension advisory services granted by AFPs became of special relevance.
From the implementation of multiple funds in September 2002 through the end of the year 2007, the returns reached by each of the five funds recorded outstanding levels, with highest returns in those funds with a greater concentration of variable income investments, such as funds Type A and B. However, during 2008 as a result of the financial crisis, affecting worldwide stock markets, the returns significantly dropped to the point of showing negative levels, adversely impacting primarily the high-risk funds and consequently decreasing their total accumulated returns. Subsequently, during the years 2009 and 2010 when stability in the markets was recovered, the trend returned to positive returns levels, where fund Types A and B obtained the highest returns. In the year 2011, stock markets recorded losses again, leading the most risky funds to obtain negative rates of return during the period, basically due to negative returns experienced by local and foreign stock markets. However, in 2012 once again the stock markets recorded higher returns in the most risky funds.
The following table sets forth information with reference to real returns, over a twelve-month period (as of year end 2012, year end 2011 and year end 2010); the annual average since the multiple funds’ inception (as of year end 2012, year end 2011 and year end 2010) and the relative positions of each of the pension funds managed:
Real return last 12 months | ||||||
Fund type | Jan12 – Dec12 | Provida’s position | Jan11 – Dec11 | Provida’s position | Jan 10 – Dec10 | Provida’s position |
Fund Type A | 6.01% | 4 | -11.59% | 5 | 11.58% | 3 |
Fund Type B | 4.96% | 2 | -8.00% | 6 | 11.22% | 3 |
Fund Type C | 4.61% | 5 | -4.16% | 5 | 8.77% | 5 |
Fund Type D | 3.89% | 4 | 0.02% | 4 | 6.53% | 4 |
Fund Type E | 3.19% | 3 | 4.19% | 3 | 5.78% | 4 |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions
Annual average real return from the beginning of the multiple fund system | ||||||
Fund type | Sep02 – Dec12 | Provida’s position | Sep02 – Dec11 | Provida’s position | Sep02 – Dec10 | Provida’s position |
Fund Type A | 6.77% | 2 | 6.85% | 2 | 9.32% | 1 |
Fund Type B | 5.48% | 5 | 5.53% | 5 | 7.30% | 5 |
Fund Type C | 4.81% | 5 | 4.84% | 5 | 5.98% | 5 |
Fund Type D | 4.32% | 4 | 4.37% | 4 | 3.30% | 4 |
Fund Type E | 3.42% | 4 | 3.45% | 4 | 3.36% | 4 |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions
In terms of voluntary pension savings, as of December 31, 2012, Provida recorded the second highest number of voluntary pension savings (APV in its Spanish acronym) for accounts in the AFP industry, with a total of 210,257 active accounts, representing a market share of 26%. On the same date, funds accumulated by such APV accounts were MCh$293,988, a market share of 14%. Additionally, the law permits other financial institutions such as banks, insurance companies and investment companies to manage this kind of savings. While competitors have the advantage of offering a wider variety of products considering that AFP investment levels are limited by law, the AFPs have lower costs than other market participants and charge lower fees.
As of December 2012, according to information from the Superintendency of Pensions, the AFPs continue to play an important role in the voluntary pension savings market with market shares of 65% in the number of accounts and 56% in administered funds, followed by mutual funds with a market share of 14% in terms of number of accounts and by Insurance Companies with a market share of 18% in terms of assets under management.
Marketing and sales |
Provida’s activities, as with all AFPs in the industry, are limited to offering only those products and services permitted under the Pension Law. As a result, Provida seeks to maximize its income by attracting and retaining participants as well as by offering the possibility to make voluntary pension contributions and to receive payments under the programmed withdrawals structure.
Provida attracts participants mainly through its sales force, which targets potential clients who may be interested in changing the administration of their pension savings.
Although the scope of potential clients was restricted by the bidding process of new participants that enter the private pension system for the first time, as established by the Pension Reform Law, the same Law gradually incorporated the
contribution obligation of self-employed workers, widening the pension market. See “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Principal activities—Services of collection and management of contributions made by participants”.
The sales force also performs tasks aimed at retaining participants’ portfolios in order to avoid client transfers to other AFPs. Provida also captures new participants through its wide network of pension service centers without the intervention of sales agents.
As the largest AFP in the Chilean private pension system, Provida seeks to capitalize on its brand name recognition to attract new clients and retain the existing ones. Management believes that Provida’s prestige is boosted by its consolidated leading market position.
During 2012, Provida has developed several initiatives, among which are: (i) a share-value simulator that allows comparative analysis between a portfolio consisting of different investment instruments available in the mutual funds industry, and a combination of available multiple funds available through AFP Provida, (ii) a new website-based processing service for employers, which allows employers to process their employees’ pension information (e.g., estimated debt or uncredited contributions, either voluntary or mandatory) by entering the firm’s identification number and the password, and (iii) a new service channel through social networks (e.g., Facebook and Twitter) to communicate special campaigns (e.g., the 2012 Chilean tax reform, savings alternatives, information for self-employed workers) and provide information regarding Provida’s new products.
For third consecutive year and as part of its social responsibility activities, AFP Provida (jointly with the Business School of Adolfo Ibañez University), sponsored a specialized course and diploma in Social Security, with the aim of promoting the private pensions system and educating companies in this area by providing them with trained staff to advise their employees on pension and tax issues.
Moreover, direct marketing campaigns also played an important role in the communications plan. It highlighted the “2.0”campaign, which aims to communicate regulatory changes associated with the voluntary saving account by emphasizing its flexibility and simplicity of administration; the “Provida’s proposals for savings” campaign, which aimed to convey that AFP Provida can provide the best advice based on its the experience of over 30 years in administering savings of more than 3 million customers. Participants having voluntary products continued to receive specific communications with economic and financial information on a weekly basis. The objective was to retain and encourage them to maintain their voluntary funds in AFP Provida, for which a permanent presence campaign was carried out through mass media (press, radio, etc.).
As for telephone service, during 2012 more than 550,000 pension calls were answered, of which more than 360,000 were assisted by executives from the pension platform, obtaining a 95% assistance level within 20 seconds.
In addition, the claim management unit, managed and answered a total of 27,964 claims in 2012, of which 84% were processed through the“Contact Us”web channel.
Finally, in December 2012, audits to validate ISO 9001 Certification were approved, which allowed Provida to make continuous enhancements in processes and services granted to customers.
Among the major projects are:
- | Optimization of In-Office Services. This project aims to reduce the time spent processing pension requests by focusing the staff’s duties in advising customers on pension alternatives issues. This has led to AFP Provida as the only AFP in the industry that has publicly committed to improve this efficiency standard by processing requests regarding normal senior pensions in 15 minutes of those participants with no recognition bond, or with a recognition bond already paid. In 2012 the project was expanded to include other, more complex types of pensions, and its implementation will continue through the assistance philosophy of focusing activities in the customer rather than benefit procedures that are processing in the Company’s branch network. |
- | Management Model in Offices. The objective of this project is to organize each branch network’s duties around a new management model that consists of three focus areas: business management, benefits management and quality |
of service. Though this project, the Company seeks to focus every assistance on satisfying the customer’s needs, making every contact in an advisory opportunity.
- | Business plan. This plan included the current sales force to achieve increases in its productivity. Furthermore, a recruitment plan was carried out in order to significantly increase the number of sales agents of the Company, with clear goals towards capturing and retention of customers and the growth of voluntary savings products. Thus, at year-end 2012 the sales agent staff increased by 67% compared to the end of 2011. |
- | Service to Employers. A Unit consisting of specialized executive groups whose goal is to build long-term relationships with employers belonging to their portfolio through a good-value differentiated offer, providing personalized advice in terms of regularization and prevention of residual and uncredited contributions and estimated debts and, all this by granting employers training in pension issues and service channels. During 2012 this Unit increased its staff, focusing its efforts on training and capturing new employers. |
AFP Provida has the largest commercial network at the national level among all AFPs, as of December 31, 2012 with 59 branch offices distributed throughout the country, and divided into 10 branches located in the northern region (17% of total branch offices), 12 branches located in the central-northern region (20% of total branch offices), 12 branches located in the Metropolitan region (20% of total branch offices), 15 branches located in the southern-center region (26% of total branch offices) and 10 branches located in the southern region (17% of total branch offices).
Sales Force
Provida has focused its efforts to maintain a more specialized and highly productive sale force.
The following table compares the relative sizes of Provida’s sales force with those of its competitors as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:
Total AFP Sales Force | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
N° Sales Agents | Market Share | N° Sales Agents | Market Share | N° Sales Agents | Market Share | |||||||||||||||||||
Provida | 717 | 29.9 | % | 429 | 22.3 | % | 443 | 19.9 | % | |||||||||||||||
Habitat | 312 | 13.0 | % | 307 | 15.9 | % | 329 | 14.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Capital | 654 | 27.2 | % | 493 | 25.6 | % | 780 | 35.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Cuprum | 424 | 17.7 | % | 474 | 24.6 | % | 460 | 20.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Planvital | 293 | 12.2 | % | 224 | 11.6 | % | 216 | 9.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Modelo (*) | - | 0.0 | % | - | 0.0 | % | - | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total | 2,400 | 100 | % | 1,927 | 100 | % | 2,228 | 100 | % |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions.
(*) As AFP Modelo started operations in August 2010 and according to the information released by the Superintendency of Pensions, it does not report a sales force.
Provida has not focused its marketing efforts on any specific industry or region. Each sales agent is assigned to cover certain enterprises within a geographic coverage area. Sales personnel have visiting programs tailored to different companies to promote Provida and encourage employees to transfer to Provida from other AFPs. During these regularly scheduled visits, salespersons emphasize Provida’s size, historic performance, leading market position and reputation for high quality of customer service in order to attract participants, reinforcing the concepts of experience, capability and trust.
Regarding new participants in the system, it is important to note that the Pension Reform Law established that the bidding of the new participants portfolio, awarding the generation of new accounts for a two-year period, should be the AFP offering the lowest fee among the current fees, which must be applied to its entire portfolio and not only to the awarded portion. The latter has implied that the AFPs are not able to grow by capturing new workers that enter the labor market for the first time. Therefore, the main future growth sources for Provida will be focus on capturing participants with voluntary pension savings, and the reincorporation of inactive participants as active contributors, especially self-employed workers.
Provida’s total selling and marketing expenses amounted to MCh$12,183 in the fiscal year 2012, MCh$10,992 in the fiscal year 2011, and MCh$12,063 in the fiscal year 2010. The ratio of commercial expenses (corresponding to sales remunerations plus marketing expenses) over fee income was 7.9%, 7.8% and 9.3% for the fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Provida has followed a policy to make its commercial expense more efficient, decreasing such expenses by 8.9% in 2011 as compared to 2010, and 5.3% in 2010 as compared to 2009. However in 2012, the Company implemented a strategic plan, which aims to strengthen its leading position and address new market growth opportunities, through a sales force trained to capture the most profitable segments of customers with potential savings. As a result of this initiative, selling and marketing expenses increased by 10.8% in 2012 as compared to 2011.
Seasonality of the Company’s main business
The nature of the significant activities carried out by Provida relates primarily to activities related to its unique line of business, pension fund administration. Given the above, such activities are not significantly affected by seasonal factors.
Licenses
The software license contract entered into with BBVA Inversiones Chile corresponds to intellectual property rights related to the use, as well as instructions of use and functionality of, software implemented on different operating and administrative processes. This represented a total expense of MCh$2,832 for Provida as of December 31, 2012, MCh$2,832 as of December 31, 2011 and MCh$3,578 as of December 31, 2010. The enhancements incorporated for new projects amounted to MCh$0 for the fiscal year 2012, MCh$0 for the fiscal year 2011 and MCh$746 for the fiscal year 2010. For further information see “Item 10. Additional information—C. Material contracts” and “Item 19. Exhibits—4.2 Software license contract”.
In addition, the software license maintenance contract described above included in the “miscellaneous other operating expenses” line, recording updating services for changes related to new regulations or new requirements amounting to MCh$0 for fiscal year 2012, MCh$0 for fiscal year 2011 and MCh$73 for fiscal year 2010.
Government regulation
All AFPs are subject to extensive and continuous regulatory reviews. The principal authorities regulating AFPs in Chile are the Superintendency of Pensions, the Central Bank, the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance, the Rating Commission and the Pension Advisors Council. AFPs are primarily subject to the Pension Law and to the Corporation Law, and have the Superintendency of Pensions as their main regulator.
The Superintendency of Pensions
General. The Pension Reform Law created the Superintendency of Pensions, which is considered to all effects as the successor of the Superintendency of AFPs. The Superintendency of Pensions, an independent governmental agency under the supervision of the Ministry of Labor and Social Security, is in charge of supervising and controlling AFPs. The Superintendency of Pensions authorizes the creation of new AFPs and mergers of existing ones and has broad powers to interpret and enforce legal and regulatory requirements. Furthermore, in cases of non-compliance, it has the ability to impose sanctions, such as admonitions and fines and in extreme cases it may order the liquidation of an AFP. In addition, any amendment of an AFP’s by-laws, such as an increase in capital, is subject to the Superintendency of Pensions’ approval. New functions and powers of the Superintendency of Pensions include the authority to monitor and supervise the solidarity pension system administered by the Social Pension Institute and establish and administer the Pension Advisors Registry.
The Superintendency of Pensions’ officers frequently inspect the AFPs’ branch offices and examine their activities and records. AFPs are required to submit their quarterly financial statements to the Superintendency and periodically provide detailed information on their operations. The audited financial statements for each fiscal year must be filed with the Superintendency of Pensions within 60 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by the report.
The Central Bank
The Central Bank is an independent legal entity created under the Chilean Constitution. It is subject to the Central Bank Act and, to the extent applicable and not inconsistent, also to the laws and regulations applicable to the private sector. It is governed and administered by a Council composed of five members appointed by the President of the Republic and requiring a “special majority” vote of the Chilean Senate to be elected.
The Central Bank is responsible for, among other things, monetary policy and exchange controls in Chile. The appropriate registration of a foreign investment in Chile grants the investor access to the formal exchange market. Foreign investments can be registered with the Foreign Investment Committee under Decree Law N° 600 or can be registered with the Central Bank under the Central Bank Act. Additionally, the Central Bank is responsible for establishing the maximum investment limits permitted for pension funds by type of securities and by type of issuer within certain defined ranges. However, it cannot establish minimum investment limits.
The Superintendency of Securities and Insurance (the “SVS”)
The SVS is an independent governmental agency that supervises, regulates and controls the Chilean capital markets. As a public corporation listed on the Chilean stock exchange, Provida is subject to the supervision, regulation and control of the SVS.
The Rating Commission
The Rating Commission is composed of one representative of the Superintendency of Pensions, one representative of the Superintendency of Banks and Financial Institutions and one representative of the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance. All of the representatives are designated by their respective Superintendents and by four representatives of the AFP industry. The Rating Commission’s main objective is to determine whether securities qualify as acceptable for pension fund investment.
With the Pension Reform Law, the approval of securities on foreign investments is made by the Investment Regime, a new legal body incorporated by the regulation for pension fund investments.
Pension Advisors Council
The Pension Advisors Council is composed of one person appointed by the President of the Republic of Chile with certain requirements; one executive designated by the Central Bank of Chile; one executive designated by the AFPs and two executives designated by the Deans of the economics and business administration faculties of credited Universities.
The main functions of this Council relate to the issuance of pronouncements regarding matters covered by the Investments Regime and proposals to regulate investments of pension funds, especially in connection with investment limit structures, mechanisms for measuring the risk of investment portfolios and operations with derivative instruments made by pension funds. Additionally, it will advise the Superintendency of Pensions in terms of investments of pension funds.
The Investment Regime was created through a resolution passed by the Superintendency of Pensions and subscribed by the Treasury, having been previously consulted the Pension Advisory Council, and it includes certain regulations that regulate investments made by the Administrators with the resources of pension funds and defines investment limits intended to have an adequate diversification of funds to achieve appropriate returns and safety for such resources.
Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act |
We are disclosing the following information pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), which requires an issuer to disclose whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with natural persons or entities designated by the U.S. government under specified Executive Orders, including activities not prohibited by U.S. law and conducted outside the United States by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with local law. In order to comply with this new requirement, we have requested relevant information from our affiliates globally.
Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida S.A. has not knowingly engaged in activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with natural persons or entities designated by the U.S. government under specified Executive Orders.
Because we are controlled by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. (BBVA), a Spanish corporation, our disclosure includes activities, transactions or dealings conducted outside the United States by non-U.S. affiliates of BBVA and its consolidated subsidiaries (the BBVA Group) which are not controlled by us. BBVA is subject to the disclosure requirements of Section 13(r) for its Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2012. In advance of that filing, we have requested that BBVA provide us a detailed description of reportable activity under Section 13(r) and have received the following information:
Legacy contractual obligations related to counter indemnities. Before 2007, BBVA Group issued certain counter indemnities to its non-Iranian customers in Europe for various business activities relating to Iran in support of guarantees provided by Bank Melli, four of which remained outstanding as of January 1, 2012 (three as of December 31, 2012). Estimated gross revenue for 2012 from these counter indemnities, which includes fees and/or commissions, did not exceed €9,000 and was entirely derived from payments made by BBVA Group’s non-Iranian customers in Europe. BBVA Group does not allocate direct costs to fees and commissions and therefore has not disclosed a separate profits measure. In addition, in accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of March 23, payments of any amounts due to Bank Melli under these counter indemnities have been blocked. BBVA Group is committed to terminating these business relationships as soon as contractually possible and does not intend to enter into new business relationships involving Bank Melli.
Letters of credit. During 2012, BBVA Group had credit exposure to Bank Mellat, Bank Tejarat and Bank Sepah arising from a total of four letters of credit issued by such Iranian banks (one by Bank Mellat, two by Bank Tejarat and one by Bank Sepah) to its non-Iranian clients in Europe. These letters of credit, all of which were granted before 2004, were used to secure BBVA Group’s loans to its clients in order to finance certain Iran-related activities. These loans were supported by the Spanish export credit agency (CESCE). Three of these loans related to its clients’ exportation of goods to Iran (consisting of medical supplies, electrical equipment, air conditioning equipment and port infrastructures). The remaining loan, which matured in 2012, was granted to an Spanish customer in connection with its provision of engineering services and supply of equipment for the construction of a petrochemical plant in Iran.
As of December 31, 2012, only one of the letters of credit referred to above (issued by Bank Sepah) remained outstanding. Estimated gross revenue for 2012 from the loans underlying these letters of credit, which includes fees and/or commissions, did not exceed €250,000. BBVA Group does not allocate direct costs to fees and commissions and therefore has not disclosed a separate profits measure. Payments of any amounts due by Bank Mellat, Bank Tejarat or Bank Sepah in 2012 under these letters of credit were initially blocked and thereafter released upon authorization by the relevant Spanish authorities. BBVA Group is committed to terminating the outstanding business relationship with Bank Sepah as soon as contractually possible and does not intend to enter into new business relationships involving Bank Mellat, Bank Tejarat or Bank Sepah.
Bank Accounts. In 2012, BBVA Group maintained one account (which was closed in March 2013) for a company that produces farm vehicles and tractors and a number of accounts for certain of its employees (some of whom have the Iranian nationality). BBVA Group believes that 51% of the share capital of such company is controlled by an Iranian company in which the Iranian Government might have an interest. Estimated gross revenue for 2012 from these accounts, which includes fees and/or commissions, did not exceed €5,000. BBVA Group does not allocate direct costs to fees and commissions and therefore has not disclosed a separate profits measure. BBVA Group is committed to terminating its business relationships with the employees of this company as soon as contractually possible and does not intend to enter into new business relationships involving this company or its employees.
Iranian embassy-related activity. BBVA Group maintains bank accounts in Spain for three employees of the Iranian embassy in Spain. In addition, BBVA Group maintains bank accounts in Venezuela for seven employees of the Iranian embassy in Venezuela and has provided one employee with an insurance against theft at ATMs which will expire on November 6, 2013. Estimated gross revenue for 2012 from embassy-related activity, which includes fees and/or commissions, did not exceed €2,000. BBVA Group does not allocate direct costs to fees and commissions and therefore have not disclosed a separate profits measure. BBVA Group is committed to terminating these business relationships as soon as legally possible.
Activity related to U.S. Executive Order 13,224. Until January 2, 2012 BBVA Group maintained two deposit accounts and three credit cards in Colombia for one individual designated by the U.S. under Executive Order 13,224 on December 29, 2011. On January 2, 2012 such deposit accounts and credit cards were closed and cancelled, respectively. Estimated gross revenue in 2012 for the activity referred to above, which includes fees and/or commissions, was nil.
Correspondent relationship with the Central Bank of Iran. Until September 11, 2012, BBVA Group maintained a correspondent relationship with the Central Bank of Iran in connection with non-U.S. dollar payments made in connection with certain transactions described above. There were no transactions with the Central Bank of Iran during 2012. Accordingly, there was no related gross revenue or net profits recognized in 2012. On September 11, 2012, BBVA Group terminated its correspondent relationship with the Central Bank of Iran.
Provida was integrated into the BBVA Group in July 1999. The BBVA Group is an internationally diversified financial group with a significant presence in the traditional banking sector, as well as other sectors such as insurance, real estate and financial services. On December 31, 2012 the BBVA Group had 1,012,864 shareholders and 115,852 employees worldwide in a network of 7,978 branches. In Chile, the BBVA Group manages assets of MUS$46,133 (MCh$22,079,265) through Provida in a competitive market in which Provida has sustained a leading position over time.
The following chart currently sets out the related companies comprising Provida’s corporate structure:
(*) Interest formerly held by predecessor BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A.
BBVA Group holds directly and indirectly a 64.3% share capital in Provida. This figure is comprised of an approximately 51.6% interest held directly by Inversiones Previsionales S.A. and an approximately 12.7% interest held through American Depositary Shares held directly by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A.
International |
In May 1995, Provida amended its by-laws to allow for the creation of a subsidiary, Provida Internacional, whose objective is to invest in companies in countries other than Chile with the purpose of granting social security benefits in those countries.
Currently, the only non-Chilean subsidiary interest held by Provida is AFP Génesis in Ecuador. |
- | Ecuador-AFP Génesis. The initial investment in AFP Génesis was made in 1995 and Provida Internacional held a 25.00% equity interest until September 2001, when it acquired the remaining 75.00% of the shares held by Filanbanco, becoming the sole shareholder with 100% of the shares. In 2012, this subsidiary generated profits of MCh$2,296, decreasing by 26.4% (MCh$824) with respect to 2011. This result was attributable to lower fee income and the lower exchange rate as compared to the rate recorded in 2011 (7.7%), but such result was partially offset by the decreased expense in remunerations of both administrative and sales personnel. In 2011, this subsidiary generated profits of MCh$3,106, increasing 10.4% (MCh$292) with respect to 2010. This positive result was largely attributable to higher fee income and the positive effect of the depreciation of Chilean peso (10.9%) with respect to the dollar in 2010 (AFP Génesis’ functional currency is the dollar). |
The main market indicators regarding AFP Génesis held through its wholly owned subsidiary Provida Internacional S.A., are as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year | Number of Affiliates | Market share | Ranking | Assets under Management (MUS$) | Market Share | Ranking | ||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 256,974 | 81 | % | 1 | 67 | 66 | % | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 240,086 | 69 | % | 1 | 67 | 67 | % | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 220,320 | 78 | % | 1 | 63 | 72 | % | 1 |
Source: Superintendency of Companies and Stock Markets in Ecuador.
It is noteworthy, as mentioned in "Item 4. Information on Provida — A. History and development ", both AFORE Bancomer in Mexico and AFP Horizonte in Peru were sold in the first quarter of 2013.
It is important to point out that the higher accrued benefit of the investment in AFORE Bancomer in Mexico and AFP Horizonte in Peru includes profits of these associates only until November 2012. As a result of the analysis of selling the pension business in Latin America initiated by the BBVA Group in May 2012, Provida Internacional began to consider sales alternatives, and therefore classified these investments as assets held for sale on its balance sheet at the end of November 2012, in accordance with IFRS. The results from these affiliates thus are no longer recognized.
- | Peru-AFP Horizonte. Provida Internacional held until February 27, 2013 a 15.87% equity interest in AFP Horizonte in Peru, where it had been present since 1993. In 2012, Provida’s share of profits from AFP Horizonte was MCh$3,404, increasing by MCh$1,220 (55.9%) with respect to 2011 due to higher gains from mandatory investments and increased fee income. In 2011, Provida’s share of profits in this equity investee was MCh$2,184, a decrease of 2.8%, (MCh$64), with respect to 2010. This decrease was as a result of losses from mandatory investments in 2011 as compared to the gains obtained in 2010. In 2010, Provida’s share of profits was MCh$2,248, declining by 3.4% (MCh$80) with respect to 2009 due to lower returns generated from mandatory investments in 2010. |
- | Mexico-AFORE Bancomer. In November 2000, Provida Internacional purchased a 7.50% equity interest in AFORE Bancomer in Mexico and continued to hold such interest until January 9, 2013. In 2012, Provida’s share of profits in this equity investee was MCh$4,263, an increase of MCh$460 (12.1%) with respect to 2011, as a result of higher fee income and increased gains from mandatory investments. In 2011, Provida’s share of profits in this equity investee was MCh$3,802, an increase of MCh$186 (5.1%) with respect to 2010, caused by higher fee income received in the period. |
Additionally, the market indicators regarding AFP Horizonte in Peru and AFORE Bancomer in Mexico for the last three years were as follows:
As of December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Affiliates | Market share | Ranking | Assets under Management (MUS$) | Market Share | Ranking | |||||||||||||||||||
Peru – AFP Horizonte | 1,422,065 | 27 | % | 1 | 8,830 | 24 | % | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
Mexico – AFORE Bancomer | 4,471,605 | 9 | % | 4 | 22,088 | 15 | % | 2 |
As of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Affiliates | Market share | Ranking | Assets under Management (MUS$) | Market Share | Ranking | |||||||||||||||||||
Peru – AFP Horizonte | 1,352,534 | 27 | % | 1 | 7,194 | 24 | % | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
Mexico – AFORE Bancomer | 4,381,799 | 10 | % | 4 | 17,719 | 15 | % | 2 |
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Affiliates | Market share | Ranking | Assets under Management (MUS$) | Market Share | Ranking | |||||||||||||||||||
Peru – AFP Horizonte | 1,272,036 | 27 | % | 1 | 7,295 | 23 | % | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
Mexico – AFORE Bancomer | 4,459,695 | 11 | % | 3 | 16,206 | 16 | % | 2 |
Source: Based on data from the Superintendency of Banks and Insurances in Peru and the National Commission for Saving System for Retirement in Mexico.
The following table describes the total of Provida’s share of profits in its equity investees, both foreign and local, for the last three fiscal years:
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Net Profit Provida | 104,034 | 78,855 | 91,624 | |||||||||
– Net Profit excluding gains of associated entities (*) | 90,801 | 69,144 | 82,835 | |||||||||
– Share of profit (loss) of foreign associated entities accounted for using equity method (*) | 7,667 | 5,986 | 5,864 | |||||||||
– Share of profit (loss) of local associated entities accounted for using equity method | 5,567 | 3,725 | 2,925 | |||||||||
Share of profit (loss) of associated entities for using equity method/Net Profit | 12.7 | % | 12.3 | % | 9.6 | % |
(*) Profits on associated entities do not include the consolidated entity AFP Génesis in Ecuador, which is consolidated with Provida.
It is important to point out that through its foreign associates, Provida implemented and promoted its leadership experience in developing business regarding the administration of private pension systems.
Since 1981, Provida’s strategy has included the development of a nationwide network of branches and also has enhanced its infrastructure and technology through the years in order to improve its assistance model. In the first stage, the pension advisory services and quick-service processing of transactions were incorporated through self-service devices in branch offices, and collection and payment services were outsourced in order to focus on the customer assistance network. Since 2010, the Optimization of Services in Branch Offices project was implemented, in order to consolidate the service quality when processing benefits. Provida maintains 59 branch offices as of December 31, 2012.
As of December 31, 2012, Provida maintained 33 owned offices of which 18 were exclusively used as branch offices, 9 were used as branch offices but partially rented to third parties, 3 were fully rented, 2 remained unoccupied and the remaining 1 was used as an administrative office.
The principal property that Provida owns is its 18-story headquarters building, known as the Pedro de Valdivia Tower, located in the east commercial neighborhood of Santiago and with a total of 13,014.18 square meters. Since 2003, it has been the BBVA Group’s corporate building in Chile, accommodating all staff units of Provida and renting spaces to staff departments of BBVA Chile S.A. The Company’s Operations Area is located in downtown Santiago.
None. |
Critical accounting policies
Financial Reporting Release Section 501.14, released by the Securities and Exchange Commission, requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of the financial statements. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, which would potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our critical accounting policies involved in the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are limited to those described below. For a summary of significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the financial statements, see Note 4 to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accounting of life and disability insurance costs
According to the Pension Law, until June 30, 2009, Provida obtained insurance to cover its obligation to provide life and disability benefits to its participants to the extent that the participants did not have sufficient funds in their individual capitalization accounts to finance the pensions. See “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Primary expenses”.
The Pension Reform Law eliminated the individual responsibility of AFPs to provide life and disability insurance benefits, stipulating a bidding process of all AFPs for life and disability insurance. The first bidding process was awarded on July 1, 2009, to a group of 5 insurance companies for a 12-month term, with a premium of 1.87%. On July 1, 2010 for a 24-month term, the second bidding was awarded to a group of 7 insurance companies with a premium of 1.49%. On July 1, 2012, the third bidding process, for a 24-month term, was awarded to a group of 4 insurers with a premium of 1.26%.
As a consequence, Provida only maintains a contract for coverage prior to July 2009 that is in a runoff stage, as a result of the modality payment of casualties due to temporary disability period (three years). Therefore, the Company’s results are affected by the cost of the insurance stemming from an insurance contract with expired coverage, depending on the relevant variables evolution at the moment of casualty payments.
For the contract previously mentioned, the Superintendency of Pensions requires AFPs to provision a minimum of 100% of the contracts’ balances, provided by the insurers in their consolidated financial statements. Nevertheless, Provida, through its experience, has concluded that, in certain discount rate scenarios, the insurers’ calculations regarding the required amounts to provision in respect of future disability payments differ from the actual amounts that the insurers will be required to pay.
Even though, the rules of the Superintendency of Pensions do not require AFPs to make additional provisions over those of the insurer, if the AFPs have enough evidence supporting a higher cost of the insurance, they shall establish provisions corresponding to such higher cost.
Provida has developed its casualty model to more accurately accrue the amounts that are required to be paid to disabled participants once their final determination is made. The basic premise is to use Provida’s best estimate, at the time of the initial determination, of the payment that will be required upon final determination. The variables associated with the model are: disability status, rate of return of pension funds over the three years of the temporarily
disabled period and the interest rate prevailing at the moment of payment (expected rate). This approach contrasts with that taken by insurance companies, which only use information relating to the disabled status of persons at the time of the initial determination, that is, three years before payments are made, and which updates the discount rates on monthly basis in accordance with the discount rate prevailing in the market in order to value the reserves.
The provisions determined under the casualty model represent the Company’s best estimate of the required future payments for life and disability benefits.
The sensitivity analysis below represents the potential changes in fair value, cash flows and earnings based on parameters that in the management’s opinion are the most relevant to determine the insurance obligation, incorporating the factors listed in the table.
2012 | ||||||||||||
Most Likely Aggregate Negative Variable Scenario | Base Scenario (***) | Most Likely Aggregate Positive Variable Scenario | ||||||||||
Discount Rate | 3.01 | % | 3.20 | % | 3.40 | % | ||||||
Rate of return on ICAs(*) | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||
Total Liability (MCh$) (**) | 5,807 | 3,544 | 1,282 |
(*) ICAs: Individual Capitalization Accounts.
(**) The liability is presented net of financial revenues generated by the insurance contract still in force.
(***) The base case is based on the casualty rate estimated by the casualty model, which is higher than the amounts in the insurers’ balance sheet and, therefore, the amounts estimated by the model were used as a basis to estimate provisions for the year ended December 31, 2012.
The following is a description of the key information used by Provida in its casualty model and how such information compares with the information used by insurance companies:
- | Discount rates: In order to calculate the amount of the required provisions necessary to cover the premiums paid on life and disability insurance, the law requires that the provision be discounted by the market rate for annuities. Commencing in July 2009 as a result of a policy framework originated by the joint insurance bidding process, the insurers could adopt the regulation to value reserves at the prevailing interest market instead of an historical interest rate (minimum of the previous semester when constituting the provision) as if it were a life annuity. |
Likewise, Provida estimates the forward rates at the moment of payment by estimating a maximum period until May 2015, since most disability casualties under a temporary disability determination will be paid within such period. Given the high volatility of interest rates, the relevance of such interest rates when determining the liability value and the short term in which such liability will be paid, it has been determined in accordance with the variability of the rates in a term of approximately 6 years the maximum and minimal amounts that this variable could be with a 99% of trust.
In order to establish the most likely positive and negative scenarios the average minimum, maximum and medium rates were calculated by a simulation methodology which is based on a Monte Carlo model.
- | Returns on participants’ individual capitalization accounts: Participants have a positive balance on their individual capitalization accounts, and this balance is subject to the pension funds returns over the three years following the establishment of the initial reserve for disability until the final disability determination is made. The insurer’s calculations do not take into account that the participant’s individual capitalization account will grow over such three-year period and, for sensitivity purposes, Provida has used the same criteria in this period of evaluation due to the high volatility experienced by pension fund returns. |
Other factors are included as variables in the casualty model which, however, do not significantly impact the calculation of the premium such as the death of disabled participants in light of a certain percentage of participants that receive an initial disability entitlement determination and die prior to the final determination of their disability. Because survivor beneficiary benefits are lower than disability payments, this percentage can significantly influence the amount of disability payments that are ultimately required to be made. The insurer assumes that no disabled participants will die prior to the final determination of their disability. As the contract is in a run-off stage until June 30, 2013, Provida has assumed the same criteria as the insurance company.
In the case of incurred but not reported claims, Provida does not make any provisions, since the coverage period for disability finished and the deceased participants under coverage reported represent a minimum percentage of casualties.
Therefore, during the term of an insurance contract, the Company calculates and establishes provisions for the expected cost to the insurer. In fact, through the application of the casualty model previously described, the provisions made by Provida with respect to future premium payments to be made to the insurer tend to reflect in a more accurate way the effective payments that it will have to make so that there is a higher correlation between revenues and expenses for a specific period. The information in the casualty model is reviewed monthly, making any modification considered appropriate at that moment.
Finally, it is important to note that this expense has been decreasing due to proximity of the expiration date of such contract, which will be on June 30, 2013.
In accordance with IFRS criteria, the Company must maintain its liability at fair value, and due to the higher speed in the payments of casualty claims and the lower impact of the discount rate, as a result of the proximity of the payments, the casualty model has shown as of December 31, 2012, a lower casualty rate than the casualty rate projected in the previous year.
However, under the rules of the Superintendency of Pensions, Provida must apply the discount rate of the insurer to the provision should it be lower than the casualty model, a situation that has not occurred as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012.
Mandatory investments |
The principal financial investments of Provida are mandatory investments which aim to guarantee the minimum return required by law equal to 1% of investment in shares of each pension fund under administration. The mandatory investment requirement is calculated according to instructions issued by the Superintendency of Pensions. Mandatory investments represented approximately 50% of total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As established in Decree Law 3500, the mandatory investment’s purpose is to provide an actual minimum rate of return over the investment portfolios for each of the pension funds. This minimum rate of return is based on the weighted average real rate of return of all pension funds of the AFP system, over a 36-month period. This requirement has been determined in accordance with the different portfolio compositions, requiring a larger margin for those with a greater investment in variable income securities and therefore potentially subject to higher volatility (Funds Type A and B). If for a certain month the rate of return of a pension fund was lower than the minimum rate of return requirement, the AFP is required to cover the difference within five days of such determination by the Superintendency of Pensions. If mandatory investments are used to fund any deficit in the required level of return, the AFP must replenish them within 15 days. If a deficit is not covered or if mandatory investments are not replenished, the AFP will be liquidated by the Superintendency of Pensions.
Although gains and losses on mandatory investments have certain risks to the stability of the Company’s results in view of the evolution of the returns obtained by different portfolio compositions in the pension funds, the greatest risk associated with mandatory investments is non-compliance with the minimum rate of return requirement. Provida’s risk management policies for mandatory investment are described in Note 4 to Provida’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Provida’s management has designated mandatory investments as financial assets at fair value through profit and loss as those financial assets are managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair-value basis in accordance with the Company’s documented investment management policy, and information about the mandatory investments is provided internally on that basis.
Impairment of Long-Lived assets |
Goodwill |
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to a cash-generating unit that is expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. A cash-generating unit to which goodwill has been allocated is tested for
impairment annually, or more frequently when there is indication that the unit may be impaired. If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than its carrying amount, the impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the unit and then to the other assets of the unit pro rata based on the carrying amount of each asset in the unit. Any impairment loss for goodwill is recognized directly in profit or loss in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. An impairment loss recognized for goodwill is not reversed in subsequent periods.
On disposal of the relevant cash-generating unit, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in the determination of the profit or loss on disposal.
Impairment of Tangible and Intangible Assets other than Goodwill |
At the end of each reporting period, Provida reviews the carrying amount of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment at least annually, and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.
If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, Provida estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognized immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease.
When an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
Please see “Item 18. Financial Statements” and Note 3 to Provida’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding recent accounting pronouncements.
Introduction to Provida’s results from operations |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Provida’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements, and the Notes thereto, included elsewhere in this annual report. See “Item 18. Financial Statements.”
Provida is the largest AFP in Chile, providing management of pension funds and various related services. These services are limited to those permitted for AFPs under the Pension Law and revenues are largely dependent on the level of fees charged to participants. As a consequence, Provida’s results from operations are dependent on the general level of economic activity in Chile and, in particular, on the number of workers who affiliate with Provida and make monthly contributions, as well as the amount of their taxable salaries subject to contributions. Given that during recent years the Chilean economy has grown, Provida estimates that number of workers in Chile and their aggregate salaries will maintain its growing trend in the future, although not necessarily at the same rate as in the past. Because of its important market share, the broad geographic coverage of its branch network, and the diversity of its participants, Provida believes that its revenues are not dependent on any particular sector of economic activity.
The principal source of revenues from operations for Provida (See “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Primary revenues”) is the fees charged to contributors in connection with deposits of their monthly mandatory contributions. Therefore, the revenues from operations of Provida can be materially impacted by any combination of significant changes in fee rates, the number of contributors or taxable salaries. From December 1999 until April 2006, Provida charged a variable fee of 2.25% over each contributor’s salary and a nominal fixed fee of Ch$390 per month discounted from the contributor’s accounts. From May 2006 onwards, the variable fee increased to 2.39% and the fixed fee was eliminated. In January 2008, the variable fee increased to 2.59%, and subsequently in October 2008, it increased again to 2.64%, basically due to the increase in the insurance coverage to participants. In July 2009, the variable fee decreased to 1.54% due to the Pension Reform Law’s elimination of AFPs’ individual obligation to provide life and disability insurance (See “Item 3. Key Information –— Recent regulatory changes”) and has remained the same during the years 2011 and 2012.
For voluntary pension savings, Provida established a nominal fixed fee of Ch$1,250 for each transfer of funds from other institutions and a yearly fee of 0.56% over administered funds. In relation to voluntary accounts, in October 2008 Provida started to charge a variable fee of 0.92% for administered balances and eliminated the fixed fee for withdrawals. Additionally, the Company charges a variable fee of 1.25% over the pensions for programmed withdrawals. With respect to pensions for programmed withdrawals or temporary incomes, the Company charges a variable fee of 1.25% over the pensions. Additionally, the Company charges a fixed fee of Ch$1,250 for transferring contributions of voluntary participants to other institutions (See “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Primary revenues”).
Generally, another significant source of revenues has been the gains on mandatory investments. Gains generated from mandatory investments belong to the AFP but do not necessarily result in increased cash flow because as the pension funds grow, so do the reserve requirements imposed on mandatory investments.
The most significant components of Provida’s expenses from operations (See “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Primary expenses”) are employee expenses for both administrative and sales staff, and miscellaneous other operating expenses that include marketing expenses, data processing expenses, administration costs, disability qualification costs and the Board of Directors’ remunerations. Until 2009 the cost of life and disability insurance premiums was the most important expense in the total expenses from operations (46%). Such expense was a recurring cost until July 2009, when the Pension Reform Law eliminated AFPs’ individual responsibility to provide benefits related to the life and disability insurance.
Other income (revenues) of Provida are: share of the profit (loss) from equity accounted associates, financial costs, income from investments, exchange difference, other non-operating income and other non-operating expenses.
The following table sets forth the composition of Provida’s revenues from operations and expenses for the periods indicated:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
REVENUES FROM OPERATIONS: | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
Fee income | 86.1 | % | 93.7 | % | 76.9 | % | ||||||
Gain (loss) on mandatory investments | 8.1 | % | -2.3 | % | 12.9 | % | ||||||
Other revenues from operations | 5.8 | % | 8.6 | % | 10.2 | % | ||||||
TOTAL REVENUES FROM OPERATIONS | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
EXPENSES FROM OPERATIONS: | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
Life and disability insurance premium expense | -5.4 | % | -3.5 | % | 3.3 | % | ||||||
Employee expenses | 46.4 | % | 45.6 | % | 43.1 | % | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization expenses | 12.5 | % | 12.2 | % | 11.1 | % | ||||||
Impairment losses | 0.5 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.8 | % | ||||||
Miscellaneous other operating expenses | 46.0 | % | 45.7 | % | 41.7 | % | ||||||
TOTAL EXPENSES FROM OPERATIONS | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions
The following table sets forth additional relevant information on Provida that corresponds to monthly averages for the following periods:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
Monthly Averages | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
Number of contributors | 1,796,516 | 1,786,857 | 1,785,997 | |||||||||
Administrative personnel | 956 | 909 | 898 | |||||||||
Sales personnel | 535 | 433 | 460 |
Source: Superintendency of Pensions
Operating results for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011
Provida recorded a profit after taxes of MCh$104,034 for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of 31.9% as compared to the profit after taxes of MCh$78,855 for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The following is a year-to-year comparison by major income statement line item for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
Revenues from operations
In fiscal year 2012, total revenues from operations were MCh$178,233, an increase of MCh$28,454 or 19.0% as compared to the prior fiscal year. This increase was caused by higher gains from mandatory investments of MCh$17,984, and higher revenues of MCh$10,470. An explanation of variations for each class of revenues from operations for the fiscal year 2012 as compared to the fiscal year 2011 is described below:
In fiscal year 2012, revenues were MCh$163,718, an increase of MCh$10,470 or 6.8% with respect to the fiscal year 2011. This increase is mainly explained by higher fee income of MCh$13,056, as the period recorded increased revenues from mandatory contributions. The above was partially offset by lower other revenues of MCh$2,586, due to lower financial revenues from the life and disability insurance premium, as well as, lower fees received by AFP Genesis in Ecuador.
- | Fee income was MCh$153,415 in fiscal year 2012, an increase of MCh$13,056 (9.3%) as compared to fiscal year 2011. This increase was mainly attributable to higher mandatory contributions as a result of higher participant’s salary base (8.8%), due to the increase in the taxable income of contributors. In addition, the period recorded higher mandatory fee income received from the regularization of residual and unprocessed contributions from previous periods made by the Social Pension Institute. |
As a result of the previously mentioned growing trend of its participants’ salary base previously mentioned, Provida has maintained its leading position in the pension industry with an average market share of 38% in terms of number of participants, 35% in terms of contributors, 28% in terms of salary base and 29% in terms of total assets under management in the fiscal year 2012. In figures, the average number of contributors was 1,796,516; the monthly average salary base was around MUS$1,659, and the assets under management were MUS$46,133 as of December 31, 2012.
- | Other revenues were MCh$10,303 in fiscal year 2012, decreasing by MCh$2,586 (20.1%), with respect to fiscal year 2011. This decrease was attributable to lower financial revenues of MCh$1,198 (55.7%) stemming from the life and disability insurance. This result was boosted by lower cash flows administered by the Company, given the payment of casualties related to the insurance policy currently in a runoff stage; and lower returns obtained in the period. Likewise, lower other revenues of MCh$1,388 (12.9%) were recorded, basically due to lower revenues from operations attained by the associate Genesis in Ecuador. |
In fiscal year 2012, there was a gain from mandatory investments of MCh$14,515, an increase of MCh$17,984 with respect to the losses recorded in fiscal year 2011. The weighted average nominal return of pension funds was +7.27% in fiscal year 2012 as compared to the negative nominal return of -1.44% recorded in fiscal year 2011. The main contributions in the year 2012 were made by Fund Type C (44% of the gains) with a nominal return of +7.18% and Fund Type B (18% of the gains) with a nominal return of +7.54%.
The positive overall return in the year was triggered by the gains recorded in the foreign stock markets (MSCI World +13.6%: Japan +24.4%, USA +13.8%, Europe +8.8%; MSCI Emerging +15.0%: Mexico +17.7%, China +16.0%, Russia +10.9%, Brazil +7.0%), and the local stock market (IPSA +3.0%).
Expenses from operations
In fiscal year 2012, total expenses from operations were MCh$69,364, an increase of MCh$2,213 or 3.3% as compared to the prior fiscal year. This increase was caused by higher personnel expenses of MCh$1,552, superior miscellaneous other operating expenses of MCh$1,269, higher costs incurred in depreciation and amortization of MCh$469 and increased impairment losses of MCh$315. These increases were partially offset by the gain recorded by the premium of the life and disability insurance, with a positive variation of MCh$1,392 An explanation of variations for each class of expenses from operations for fiscal year 2012 as compared to fiscal year 2011 is provided below.
Life and disability insurance premium expense recorded a gain of MCh$3,718 in fiscal year 2012, with a positive variation of MCh$1,392 as compared to the gain recorded in fiscal year 2011.
As of 2012, most existing casualties have been paid, hence there has been a permanent decline in the level of reserves for casualties, mainly due to the settlement of casualties as the contract is in a run-off stage and neither new premiums nor new claims will be covered.
As a result of the monthly analysis regarding the reserve fluctuation, it was concluded that the speed of payment of casualty claims was higher than the one previously estimated, thus the fluctuation of long term discount rates had a lower effect over the value of reserves. Consequently, it was determined that the provision calculated by the model as of December 2011 should be reduced according to the development of the reserve amount. Such adjustment involved a reversal of MCh$4,047 in provisions for casualties, higher by MCh$1,351 as compared to the figure recorded in 2011.
Employee expenses amounted to MCh$32,157 in fiscal year 2012, an increase of MCh$1,552, or 5.1%, as compared to fiscal year 2011. This result was driven by higher wages and salaries of sales and administrative personnel, which was partially offset by lower short term benefits.
- | Total wages and salaries to administrative personnel were to MCh$18,381 in fiscal year 2012, increasing MCh$1,094 or 6.3% as compared to 2011. This result was basically attributable to higher expenses incurred in fixed salaries as the period had a greater staff due the transfer of 92 people from BBVA Servicios Corporativos towards Provida’s permanent personnel in September, 2012. Additionally, the period recorded higher variable-based salaries paid to chiefs and supervisors of sales, mainly related to awards of the commercial plan; a higher provision for accrued vacation for the greater staff, as well as lower use of vacations; plus higher amounts of legal contributions due to the increased salaries paid in the period. The above was partially offset by lower expenses in overtime (a greater control over them), and lower expenses in training specially referred to trips, accommodation and food. |
In figures, the average administrative staff amounted to 956 workers in fiscal year 2012, while in fiscal year 2011 it was 909, an increase of 5.1%. By comparing the end of each period, the administrative staff increased by 11.1%, from 921 in December 2011 to 1,023 workers in December 2012.
- | Total wages and salaries to sales personnel amounted to MCh$10,299 in fiscal year 2012, a decrease of MCh$1,092 or 11.8% with respect to fiscal year 2011. This variation was basically caused by higher variable compensation paid, attributable to increased commission, awards and participations paid to sales agents, and higher fixed compensation and increased benefit allowances, as a consequence of a greater staff maintained in the period. In addition, the period recorded a higher provision for accrued vacations as a consequence of lower use of them and also a greater staff. |
In figures, the average number of sales employees was 535 workers in fiscal year 2012, an increase of 23.5% with respect to the average number maintained in fiscal year 2011 (433 sales agents). By comparing the end of each period, the sales force increased by 67.1% from 429 salespeople in December 2011 to 717 in December 2012. It is
worth noting that the Company has incorporated approximately 250 sales agents since August 2012 in connection with the business plan previously discussed.
- | Short-term benefits to employees were MCh$1,854 in fiscal year 2012, decreasing by MCh$646 or 25.8% as compared to fiscal year 2011 due to lower provisions required for bonuses. These lower provisions were attributable to the fact that the Company has enough stock for the profits attained in the period as surplus from last year after the payments made. |
- | Indemnities paid in fiscal year 2012 were MCh$1,623, an increase of MCh$12 or 0.7% compared to fiscal year 2011. This figure was composed of indemnities paid both, to sales personnel (MCh$460) and to administrative personnel (MCh$1,163). |
Depreciation and amortization expenses totaled MCh$8,676 in fiscal year 2012, an increase of MCh$470 or 5.7% with respect to fiscal year 2011 mainly due to the following:
- | Depreciation expense was MCh$2,435 in fiscal year 2012, an increase of MCh$82 or 3.5% compared to fiscal year 2011. This increase was mainly caused by higher depreciation of real estate due to the amortization of restructuring works in properties sold to BBVA Chile S.A. The above was partially offset by lower depreciation of computer hardware and building for own use. |
- | The amortization expense was MCh$6,241 in fiscal year 2012, an increase of MCh$388 or 6.6% with respect to fiscal year 2011. The variation was attributable to higher amortization costs in intangibles, associated to internal development enhancements made in the Unified Platform. |
Impairment losses were MCh$315 in fiscal year 2012, an increase for the same amount, since the fiscal year 2011 did not record any amount for this concept. It should be mentioned that the Company implemented a policy aimed at assessing its principal fixed assets (real estate over MCh$40) every three years or earlier if there is any information of impairment.
Miscellaneous other operating expenses were MCh$31,934 in fiscal year 2012, an increase of MCh$1,269 or 4.1% compared to fiscal year 2011 due to the following:
- | Marketing expenses were MCh$1,884 in fiscal year 2012, an increase of MCh$100, or 5.6%, compared to fiscal year 2011. This increase was caused by higher expenses in marketing recorded by AFP Genesis in Ecuador (MCh$119) administration during the last quarter of 2012, mainly related to advertising in response to a higher level of competiveness exhibited in the Ecuadorian business of fund management. |
- | Data processing expenses were MCh$3,902 in fiscal year 2012, an increase of MCh$108 or 2.8% with respect to fiscal year 2011. This result was caused by higher hardware and software maintenance costs with related companies, as the period recorded higher expenses with the Regional Computer Center (CCR) in Mexico due to larger volumes of operations; as well as cost of maintenance of other equipment and installations referred to help desk and commercial support services.The latter was partially offset by lower expenses in liaison services with branch offices, as fees and services provided by Movistar were reviewed, hence reducing the monthly expense applicable to all the year 2012. |
- | Administration expenses were MCh$22,935 in fiscal year 2012, an increase of MCh$796 or 3.6% compared to fiscal year 2011. This increase was mainly attributable to a provision (MCh$1,400) made in December 2012 for write-offs, as the Superintendency of Pensions requested to make certain reviews. The latter was partially offset by lower expenses in advisories due to the amendment of the services rendering contract subscribed with BBVA Servicios Corporativos Limitada, starting in September 2012, which reduced the rendered services and, thus, the cost was reduced from UF 241,109, to UF 41,932 (equivalent to MCh$5,439 and MCh$946, respectively). This lower cost was intended to offset the increased expenses in compensation of the administrative staff previously explained. |
- | Other operating expenses are associated with expenses incurred for evaluation and qualification of disability status of participants and compensation of the Board of Directors, which amounted to MCh$3,213 in fiscal year 2012, higher by MCh$266 or 9.0% with respect to the fiscal year 2011. This result was explained by higher |
expenses in evaluation and qualification of disability, related to medical fees and clinical examinations for those casualties still pending belonging to the disability contract (currently in run-off); as well as claims of participants not covered by the current insurance system whose disability determinations must be financed by the AFPs according the regulation.
Other income (expenses)
Financial income (expenses) was MCh$2,916 in fiscal year 2012, an increase of MCh$1,363 or 87.8% with respect to fiscal year 2011, due to the higher liquidity levels for the Company obtained from such investments, which were invested in deposits with higher interest rates than those in 2011.
In the fiscal year 2011, share of profit (loss) of associates accounted for using equity method was MCh$13,233, an increase of MCh$3,522 or 36.3% with respect to fiscal year 2011. This increase was the outcome of better results generated by all associates, excepting the local associate DCV. Locally, the associates contributed in the aggregate of MCh$1,842, given the higher fees on sales generated by Previred, but mainly higher fee income from AFC. After BBVA Group announced to the market on May 24, 2012 its strategic review of alternatives for its mandatory pension fund administration business in Latin America, Provida Internacional began to consider sales alternatives for its interests in AFORE Bancomer and AFP Horizonte and, therefore, classified these investments as assets held for sale on its balance sheets at the end of November 2012. As a result, our financial statements include profits realized by these assets during the 11-month “held for sale” period, representing an increase compared to year 2011 of MCh$1,220 with respect to AFP Horizonte in Peru and MCh$460 with respect to AFORE Bancomer in Mexico. In each case these profits were due to higher gains from mandatory investments and increased fee income at these companies.
In the fiscal year 2012 exchange differences recorded losses for MCh$10 as of December 2012, negative by MCh$132 with respect to the gains recorded in 2011. This result was attributable to losses in exchange rate as the Chilean peso appreciated 7.6% against the dollar (v/s the depreciation of 10.9% in 2011) which negatively affected its net position in assets held in dollars. Additionally, the period recorded lower gains in UF fluctuation due to a 2.5% increase in its valuation, which was less than the increase of 3.9% registered in 2011, affecting the net position of assets adjusted by UF.
Other non-operating revenues were MCh$4,901 in fiscal year 2012, an increase of MCh$1,852 or 60.7% as compared to fiscal year 2011. This result was attributable to the profit from the sale of real estate assets not used by the Company. In addition, reimbursements were recorded during the period related to the earthquake that occurred in February 2010. The period also recorded reversal of provision from previous periods, mainly in labor litigation which were finally determined as favorable for the Company. Provisions for labor suits are accounted for as other operating expenses, but the reversal of provisions corresponding to previous periods must be accounted for as revenues.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense was MCh$25,506 in fiscal year 2012, higher by MCh$7,794 or 44.0% compared to fiscal year 2011. This result was driven by a higher tax expense caused by higher profits before taxes, and the implementation of the new tax law beginning in September 2012. As a consequence, the taxable profit for the year 2012 and thereafter will be affected by a higher tax rate, increasing from 18.5% to 20.0%. Additionally, the tax rate related to deferred taxes, increased from 17.0% to 20.0% due to the fact that gains from mandatory investments are estimated to be taxable in the long term. The effect of the change in the tax rate was MCh$6,721 for 2012, affecting the current tax by MCh$1,577, as well as the deferred tax by MCh$5,144.
As compensation, the Company acknowledged a deferred tax asset of MCh$1,465 with the applicable credit in the taxes of the period in December 2012. Such amount was generated by the reclassification effect of the associates AFORE Bancomer in Mexico and AFP Horizonte in Peru, as assets available for sale on the balance sheet in November 2012, due to the difference between the taxable and financial values of such investments.
Profit
During fiscal year 2012, the Company recorded a profit of MCh$104,034, an increase of MCh$25,179 or 31.9% compared to the profit recorded in fiscal year 2011. This increase was basically caused by gains from mandatory
investments and the results obtained from the Company’s recurring business, defined as revenues minus life and disability insurance premium, personnel expenses and miscellaneous other operating expenses, which increased by 9.6% or MCh$9,040 with respect to the fiscal year 2011.
Operating results for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
Provida recorded a profit after taxes of MCh$78,855 for the year ended December 31, 2011, a decrease of 13.9% as compared to the profit after taxes of MCh$91,624 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The following is a year-to-year comparison by major income statement line item for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Revenues from operations
In fiscal year 2011, total revenues from operations were MCh$149,778, a decrease of MCh$19,563 or 11.6% as compared to the prior fiscal year. This result was primarily caused by lower gains from mandatory investments of MCh$25,355, which was partially offset by higher revenues of MCh$5,792. An explanation of variations for each class of revenues from operations for the fiscal year 2011 as compared to the fiscal year 2010 is described below:
In fiscal year 2011, revenues were MCh$153,248, an increase of MCh$5,792 or 3.9% with respect to the fiscal year 2010. This increase is mainly explained by the combined effect of higher fee income of MCh$10,086, and increased revenues from mandatory contributions, which was partially offset by lower other revenues of MCh$4,294, due to lower financial revenues recorded in the period.
- | Fee income was MCh$140,359 in fiscal year 2011, an increase of MCh$10,086 (or 7.7%) as compared to fiscal year 2010. This increase was mainly attributable to higher mandatory contributions of MCh$9,359 as a result of higher participant’s salary base (7.4%), and also higher revenues on pension payments to pensioned participants (MCh$423 or 18.6%) and administration of voluntary savings (MCh$304 or 16.5%). |
As a result of the previously mentioned growing trend of its participants’ salary base previously mentioned, Provida has maintained its leading position in the pension industry with an average market share of 40% in terms of number of participants, 37% in terms of contributors, 30% in terms of salary base and 29% in terms of total assets under management in the fiscal year 2011. In figures, the average number of contributors was 1,786,857; the monthly average salary base was around MUS$1,450 and the assets under management were MUS$39,253 as of December 31, 2011.
- | Other revenues were MCh$12,889 in fiscal year 2011, decreasing by MCh$4,294 (25.0%), with respect to fiscal year 2010. This decrease was basically due to lower financial revenues of MCh$4,975 stemming from the contract of the life and disability insurance, expired in June 2009 and currently in a runoff stage. The latter has implied that only payments for casualty rate are recorded, therefore cash flows have decreased, as well as lower returns generated in the period in conformity with the insurance company contract. |
In fiscal year 2011, there was a loss on mandatory investments of MCh$3,470, a decrease of MCh$25,355 with respect to the gains recorded in fiscal year 2010. The weighted average nominal return of pension funds was -1.44% in fiscal year 2011 as compared to the nominal return of +12.18% recorded in fiscal year 2010. The nominal returns per fund type in 2011 were: Type A -8.13%, Type B -4.41%, Type C -0.41%, Type D +3.93% and Type E +8.26%.
The negative overall return in the year was triggered by the losses recorded in the foreign stock markets (MSCI World -7.6%: Japan -17.3% and Europe -8.5%; MSCI Emerging -20.5%: China -21.7%, Russia -21.7%, Brazil -17.2% and Mexico -3.1%), and the local stock market (IPSA -15.2%). These losses were slightly offset by better results achieved by local and foreign fixed income given the decrease of interest rates.
While 2011 is the first year with negative returns after the financial crisis of 2008, the two situations are not comparable and losses in 2011 are much lower. However, it is important to note that the volatility and uncertainty are inherent to the economies and their capital markets and thus the private pension system.
Additionally, it is a continuing focus of the Company to perform a detailed review of direct and indirect investments in issuers, both domestic and foreign, to reduce potential credit risks. It should be noted that throughout the year the Company did not hold any exposure to European sovereign debt assets.
Expenses from operations
In fiscal year 2011, total expenses from operations were MCh$67,150, a decrease of MCh$4,746 or 6.6% as compared to the prior fiscal year. This decrease was basically caused by the combined effect of a gain recorded for life and disability insurance premium, with a variation of MCh$4,664; the nil expense in impairment losses in 2011 as compared to the expense of MCh$556 recognized in 2010 and lower employee expenses of MCh$379. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of MCh$657 in miscellaneous other operating expenses and an increase in depreciation and amortization costs of MCh$195. An explanation of variations for each class of expenses from operations for fiscal year 2011 as compared to fiscal year 2010 is provided below.
Life and disability insurance premium expense recorded a gain of MCh$2,326 in fiscal year 2011, with a positive variation of MCh$4,664 as compared to an expense recorded in fiscal year 2010.
This result was primarily attributable to lower average forward rates at the end of year 2010 as compared to average forward rates expected at the end of year 2011 (3.01% in December 2010 versus 3.09% in December 2011), which resulted in a reversal in the provision for casualty rate, with a variation of MCh$4,385 with respect to fiscal year 2010. The reversal of provisions was determined by the difference between the amount required at the end of year 2010 using the most accurate available information, and the amount estimated by Provida’s model as of December 31, 2011.
In addition, a lower expense in temporary premium of MCh$279 was recorded in 2011, since in fiscal year 2010 a greater amount of residual and uncredited contributions were processed.
Finally, it is important to note that Provida currently maintains the obligation in respect of casualties pending of payment under the temporary disability determination that remain under coverage as of June 30, 2009, and the expiration of the contract is determined for the next 48 months, that is, June 30, 2013, by mutual consent of the parties.
Employee expenses amounted to MCh$30,605 in fiscal year 2011, a decrease of MCh$379, or 1.2%, as compared to fiscal year 2010. This result was driven by lower wages and salaries of sales personnel, and lower indemnities, which was partially offset by higher wages and salaries of administrative personnel and higher short term benefits.
- | Total wages and salaries to administrative personnel were MCh$17,287 in fiscal year 2011, increasing MCh$1,351 or 8.5% as compared to 2010. This result was driven by higher expenses incurred in fixed salaries that were inflation adjusted; accrued vacations in view of the decreased reversal of provisions due to lower use of vacations and seniority awards due to the higher provision for the new seniority award for 30 years of permanence in the Company. It added to the above, the superior expense in wages and salaries of administrative personnel recorded by the associated entity Genesis in Ecuador. |
In figures, the average administrative staff amounted to 909 workers in fiscal year 2011, while in fiscal year 2010 it was 898, an increase of 1.2%. By comparing the end of each period, the administrative staff increased by 3.5%, from 890 in December 2010 to 921 workers in December 2011.
- | Total wages and salaries to sales personnel amounted to MCh$9,208 in fiscal year 2011, a decrease of MCh$1,314 or 12.5% with respect to fiscal year 2010. This positive variation was basically caused by lower variable compensation paid, in turn attributable to lower commission paid to sales agents due to a smaller staff, as well as the lower expense recorded in wages and salaries of sales personnel recorded by the associate Genesis in Ecuador. The latter was partially offset by a higher provision made for the seniority award made to 30-year Company employees and increased fixed salaries in view of inflation adjustments, and increases in gross salaries as established in the collective agreement. |
In figures, the average number of sales employees was 433 workers in fiscal year 2011, a decrease of 5.9% with respect to the average number maintained in fiscal year 2010 (460 sales agents). By comparing the end of each period, the sales force decreased by 3.4% from 444 salespeople in December 2010 to 429 in December 2011.
- | Short-term benefits to employees were MCh$2,500 in fiscal year 2011, increasing by MCh$635 or 34.0% as compared to fiscal year 2010 due to higher provisions required for bonuses. |
- | Indemnities paid in fiscal year 2011 were MCh$1,611, a decrease of MCh$1,050 or 39.5% compared to fiscal year 2010. This decrease is due to lower indemnities paid to administrative personnel for MCh$1,251, as well as to sales personnel for MCh$1,409. |
Depreciation and amortization expenses totaled MCh$8,207 in fiscal year 2011, an increase of MCh$196 or 2.4% with respect to fiscal year 2010 mainly due to the following:
- | Depreciation expense was MCh$2,353 in fiscal year 2011, an increase of MCh$113 or 5.1% compared to fiscal year 2010. This increase was mainly caused by higher depreciation largely attributable to purchases of computer hardware made in the period. |
- | The amortization expense was MCh$5,854 in fiscal year 2011, an increase of MCh$82 or 1.4% with respect to fiscal year 2010, due to higher amortization costs in the period, related to software internal development enhancements made in the period. |
Impairment losses were nil in fiscal year 2011, a decrease of MCh$556 as compared to the impairment loss recognized in fiscal year 2010 due to furniture repairs due to damage caused by the earthquake that occurred in Chile in February 2010.
Miscellaneous other operating expenses were MCh$30,681 in fiscal year 2011, an increase of MCh$673 or 2.2% compared to fiscal year 2010 due to the following:
- | Marketing expenses were MCh$1,784 in fiscal year 2011, an increase of MCh$243, or 15.8%, compared to fiscal year 2010. This increase was basically caused by higher expenses in administration of publicity due to creative services and events and promotions. |
- | Data processing expenses were MCh$3,794 in fiscal year 2011, an increase of MCh$524 or 16.0% with respect to fiscal year 2010. This result was caused by higher hardware and software maintenance and installations expenses related to minor developments required in the period that are not qualified as investments, basically normative requirements and enhancements in systems. Additionally, higher expenses were recorded in host maintenance with related companies in view of small enhancements that did not extend the useful life of the asset. |
- | Administration expenses were MCh$22,139 in fiscal year 2011, a decrease of MCh$339 or 1.5% compared to fiscal year 2010. This decrease was mainly attributable to lower advisory expenses, due to a decreased installment payment for outsourcing services paid to BBVA Servicios Corporativos and services related to the collection for unpaid contributions (DNPA in its Spanish acronym). In addition, lower operational write-offs were recorded due to adjustments made in provisions that were not required, since the level of operating errors has decreased. |
- | Other operating expenses are associated with expenses incurred for evaluation and qualification of disability status of participants and remuneration of the Board of Directors, which amounted to MCh$2,947 in fiscal year 2011, higher by MCh$229 or 8.4% with respect to the fiscal year in 2010. This result was explained by higher compensation paid to the Board of Directors, due to per diem paid to Spanish Directors, an expense that was not incurred in 2010. |
Other income (expenses)
Financial income (expenses) was MCh$1,553 in fiscal year 2011, an increase of MCh$1,271 or 451.0% with respect to fiscal year 2010, due to the higher liquidity levels for the Company’s investments and better returns obtained from such investments, which consist primarily of time deposits.
In the fiscal year 2011, share of profit (loss) of associates accounted for using equity method was MCh$9,711, an increase of MCh$922 or 10.5% with respect to fiscal year 2010. This increase was the outcome of better results generated by the local associates, which contributed in the aggregate of MCh$800, given the positive development of
revenues on sales by Previred and fee income in the case of AFC; as well as the positive contribution of MCh$186 made by AFORE Bancomer in Mexico due to its higher fee income. The above was slightly offset by the lower result recorded by AFP Horizonte in Peru of MCh$64, basically due to lower gains in mandatory investments.
Other non-operating revenues were MCh$3,050 in fiscal year 2011, an increase of MCh$486 or 19.0% as compared to fiscal year 2010. This result was attributable to the profit from the sale of real estate assets not used by the Company and the reversal of provision in labor litigation from previous years, as the final determination was favorable for the Company. Provisions for labor suits are accounted for as other operating expenses, but the reversal of provisions corresponding to previous periods must be accounted for as revenues. The latter was partially offset by lower rentals revenues. For more information on litigation provisions, see Notes 23 and 32 to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense was MCh$17,712 in fiscal year 2011, higher by MCh$272 or 1.6% with respect to the fiscal year 2010. This result was driven by a lower tax expense caused by decreased profits before taxes which was partially offset by the effect of increased tax rates from 17% in 2010 to 20% in 2011. The tax rate for companies effective for 2012 was raised to 20% in September 2012 for the year 2012.
Profit
During fiscal year 2011, the Company recorded a profit of MCh$78,855, a decrease of MCh$12,769 or 13.9% compared to the profit recorded in fiscal year 2010. This decrease was basically caused by losses from mandatory investments, which were partially offset by the remarkable result obtained from the Company’s recurring business, defined as revenues minus life and disability insurance premium, personnel expenses and miscellaneous other operating expenses, which increased by 12.1% or MCh$10,178 with respect to the fiscal year 2010.
Impact of inflation and price-level restatement
Under IFRS Provida no longer applies price-level restatement.
Overview
The Company’s principal uses of funds are payments of personnel remunerations and other expenses from operations, replenishment of mandatory investments and dividend payments. Provida has financed these expenses by using cash generated from its operations, as well as through short-term debts. Management considers that these sources of funds will be sufficient to finance contemplated capital requirements, as well as payments of its obligations. Due to the nature of its business, Provida has significant cash flows related to fees received from mandatory and voluntary pension savings, which are expected to remain at similar levels as those recorded in recent years. Additionally, management considers that the expected growth of its customer portfolio will continue to increase its working capital requirements, for which, the Company would be well positioned to finance such requirements.
During 2010, the net variation in cash and cash equivalent was negative by MCh$3,323 (MUS$7) as a result of the negative cash flows stemming from financing activities. In 2011, the net variations in cash and cash equivalent were negative by MCh$1,074 (MUS$2) due to net negative cash flows originated from financing and investment activities, which was partially offset by the positive cash flows originated from operations. In 2012, the net variation in cash and cash equivalents was positive by MCh$5,153 (MUS$11), due to net positive cash flows originated by activities from operations, but it was partially offset by the net negative cash flows originated by financing activities.
In 2013, Provida expects that the major cash outflows may include:
- | Budgeted capital expenditures of MCh$2,800 (MUS$6); and |
- | Budgeted dividends of MCh$70,902 (MUS$148). |
- | Regarding payments and refinancing of short-term contractual obligations, the Company will generate enough resources to comply with its operating cycle. Therefore, Provida does not expect to require short term financing. |
Moreover, capital requirements for 2013 are expected to be financed through the combination of the existing capital sources and cash flows generated by operations. In terms of external financing, the Company does not foresee long-term financing needs. The financing of working capital is expected to be covered by Provida’s own resources, since Provida has generated significant cash flows from its operations and a portion of the related profits has remained in the Company. See “D. Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations.”
Sources and uses of funds
Cash and working capital. The Company has recorded positive working capital of MCh$61,523 (MUS$128), MCh$29,062 (MUS$61) and MCh$23,512 (MUS$49) as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. All the above was due to the Company’s higher liquidity levels in the past four years, as the obligation of the life and disability insurance has been gradually extinguished and due to the increased profits generated by the recurring business.
Net cash provided by operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was MCh$93,965 in 2012, representing an increase of MCh$8,018 with respect to net cash provided by operating activities in 2011. The increase was explained by the following: (i) higher fee income received of MCh$13,059 with respect to 2011, mainly sustained by the higher client’s salary base in the year, (ii) higher other inflows from operations of MCh$1,027 with respect to 2011; and (iii) higher other proceeds from interests of MCh$1,455, as well as from dividends of MCh$1,239. The above was partially offset by (i) higher other outflows from operations of MCh$4,705 and (ii) higher payments on income tax of MCh$3,875.
Net cash provided by operating activities was MCh$85,947 in 2011, representing an increase of MCh$18,221 with respect to net cash provided by operating activities in 2010. The increase was explained by the combined effect of: (i) higher fee income received of MCh$9,755 with respect to 2010, driven by the higher client’s salary base in 2011, (ii) lower other payables from operations of MCh$8,402 with respect to 2010; and (iii) higher other inflows from operations of MCh$7,526 with respect to 2010, related to the lower balance of additional contributions receivable from insurers. The above was partially offset by increased taxes on profits of MCh$5,485 due to the increase in tax rate to companies from 17% in 2010 to 20% in 2011.
Net cash provided by investing activities. Net cash provided by investing activities was MCh$2,187 in 2012, increasing by MCh$18,747 as compared to 2011, when MCh$16,560 was used in investing activities. The increase in funds from investing activities in 2012 was mainly related to (i) lower other cash outflows of MCh$13,103 paid in 2012 as compared to 2011, referred to investments in time deposits, (ii) superior other cash inflows of MCh$4,797 and (iii) higher proceeds received from disposal of property, plant and equipment of MCh $2,336 as compared to 2011.
Net cash used in investing activities was MCh$16,560 in 2011, increasing by MCh$8,087 as compared to net cash used in investing activities in 2010. The increase in use of funds from investing activities in 2011 was mainly due to higher other cash outflows of MCh$11,237 paid in 2011 as compared to 2010, referred to investments in time deposits, which were partially offset by higher net cash generated by the purchase/sale of shares from mandatory investment purchases for a net amount of MCh$3,150 with respect to 2010.
Net cash used in financing activities. The Company’s net cash used in financing activities increased by MCh$20,537 in 2012, from MCh$70,461 in 2011 to MCh$90,998 in 2012. The increase in cash used in financing activities is mainly attributable to dividends paid to shareholders of MCh$91,649 in 2012, which were higher by MCh$21,889 with respect to 2011.
Net cash used in financing activities increased by MCh$7,884 in 2011, from MCh$62,577 in 2010 to MCh$70,461 in 2011. The increase in cash used in financing activities is mainly attributable to higher dividends paid to shareholders due to better results achieved by the Company, which were MCh$69,760, higher by MCh$7,825 in 2011 as compared to MCh$61,935 in 2010.
There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that could have any material effect on Provida’s results.
The following table represents Provida’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2012:
Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | After 5 years | ||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | ||||||||||||||||||||
Life and disability insurance | 1,727 | 1,727 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Outsourcing contracts | 4,948 | 3,991 | 958 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Total Contractual Obligation | 6,675 | 5,718 | 958 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Commitments | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bank lines overdrafts | 248 | 248 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Capital lease contracts | 363 | 64 | 112 | 107 | 80 | |||||||||||||||
Total Commercial Commitments | 611 | 312 | 112 | 107 | 80 |
In the last three years, Provida’s most important contractual obligations are those related to the contract for outsourcing services with BBVA Servicios Corporativos. This contract was amended in September 2012 in terms of fees and duration. Although the contract as amended does not have a fixed duration, given the potential sale of AFP Provida to the MetLife Group (see “Item 4. Information on Provida—A. History and development—Recent developments”), it was estimated that this contract will have a duration of approximately one year. The rest of the outsourcing obligations represent payments with a one-month lag. Therefore from year 1 onwards there is no associated obligation. Please see Note 26 to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
In previous years, Provida’s most significant contractual obligation related to the life and disability insurance policy entered into with BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. Beginning in June 2009, as per the modification introduced by the Pension Reform Law in relation to the joint bidding process of the life and disability insurance, the AFPs are no longer responsible for such insurance thus, premiums originally established with the life insurers for granting benefits are not paid by AFPs, but AFPs are responsible for casualties under coverage until June 30, 2009.
The use of the banks’ credit lines overdrafts is Provida’s most material commercial commitment, used to finance business operations. As of December 31, 2012, the unused lines of credit amounted to MCh$62,000. Finally, Provida’s capital leases are basically connected with the financing of property, plant and equipment.
Provida’s Directors as of December 31, 2012 were as follows:
Directors (1) (2) | Position | Current position held since | Expiration of current term |
Joaquín Cortez Huerta | Chairman of the Board of Directors | 2011 | 2014 |
Jesús del Pino Durán | Vice-Chairman | 2007 | 2014 |
Luis Fernando Ferreres Crespo | Director | 2007 | 2014 |
Francesc Jorda Carré | Director | 2010 | 2014 |
José Martos Vallecillos | Director | 2011 | 2014 |
María Cristina Bitar Maluk | Director | 2010 | 2014 |
Jorge Marshall Rivera | Director | 2010 | 2014 |
Osvaldo Puccio Huidobro | Alternate Director | 2010 | 2014 |
(1) | None of the above mentioned Directors individually owns one percent or more of shares in Provida. |
(2) | The Board of Directors was elected during the Ordinary Shareholder’s meeting held on April 27, 2012. In such meeting Mr. Joaquín Cortez Huerta was designated as Chairman of the Board of Directors. |
Joaquín Cortez Huerta is the Chairman of the Board and has been Director of Provida since October 19, 2011. He received a commercial engineering degree from the Catholic University of Chile and a Master of Arts in economics from the University of Chicago in the United States. Before his designation as a Chairman of the Board of Directors, he was the Chief Investment Officer since July 2008 and previously, he held the same position between 1996 and April, 2007.
Jesús del Pino Durán is the Vice-Chairman of the Board and Director of Provida and has been Director of Provida since 2007. He received a degree in law and economics from the University of Seville and PADE Master in IESE, Spain.
Luis Fernando Ferreres Crespo is Director of Provida since 2007. He received a chemical engineering degree from the Universidad de Lejona (País Vasco), Spain.
Francesc Jorda Carré is Director of Provida since 2010. He received his economics degree from UNED in Madrid, Spain.
José Martos Vallecillos is Director of Provida since 2011. He received his degree in Information Sciences from the Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain and a law degree from the Universidad de Barcelona, Spain.
María Cristina Bitar Maluk is Director of Provida since 2010. She received her economics degree with a minor in Sociology from Dartmouth College in the United States, a Master of Business Administration from Tulane University, United States, and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Chile.
Jorge Marshall Rivera is Director of Provida since 2010. He received his commercial engineering degree from the University of Chile and an economics degree from Harvard University in the United States. During 2009, he was an Alternate Director of Provida.
Osvaldo Puccio Huidobro is Alternate Director of Provida since 2010. He received a philosophy degree from the University of Humboldt in Berlin, Germany.
Provida’s senior management as of December 31, 2012 was as follows:
Senior Management (1) | Position | Current position held since | Expiration of current term |
Ricardo Rodríguez Marengo | Chief Executive Officer | 2007 | N/A |
Gonzalo Camargo Cárdenas | Chief Investment Officer | 2011 | N/A |
Carlo Ljubetic Rich | Chief Commercial Officer | 2000 | N/A |
Magaly Pacheco Mena | Chief Operational Officer | 2010 | N/A |
Andrés Veszprémy Schilling(2) | General Counsel | 2012 | N/A |
Pablo Villalobos Astudillo(2) | Audit Manager | 2012 | N/A |
Marco Rivera Araya(2) | Human Resources Manager | 2012 | N/A |
María Paz Yáñez Macías | Planning and Control Division Manager | 2002 | N/A |
Juan Sepúlveda Parra | Pension Accounting Division Manager | 2007 | N/A |
Iván Baeza Galaz | Pension Marketing Division Manager | 2007 | N/A |
N/A: Not applicable
(1) | None of the above mentioned Executive Officers individually owns one percent or more of shares in Provida. |
(2) | On August 1, 2012, the management was changed as follows: Mr. Andrés Veszprémy Schilling was designated as General Counsel, replacing Mr. Rodrigo Peña Socías; Mr. Pablo Villalobos Astudillo was designated as Controller, replacing Mr. Victor Ogno Canales and Mr. Marco Rivera Araya was designated as Human Resources Manager, replacing Mr. Mauricio Araya Ahumada. |
Ricardo Rodríguez Marengo is Chief Executive Officer since 2007. He received a business management degree from the Catholic University in Argentina. Previously, he was Commercial Chief Officer in AFJP BBVA Consolidar in Argentina.
Gonzalo Camargo Cárdenas is the Chief Investment Officer since October 19, 2011. He received an economics degree from the Catholic University of Peru, a Master of Science in Finance and Economics from the Centro de Estudios
Monetarios y Financieros (CEMFI), Spain and a Doctorate in Economics from the Catholic University of Peru. Previously, he held the position of Investment Officer in AFP Horizonte Peru and CEO in the Administradora de Fondos Mutuos de BBVA Banco Continental in Peru.
Carlo Ljubetic Rich is Chief Commercial Officer since 2000. He received an industrial engineering degree from the University of Santiago of Chile.
Magaly Pacheco Mena is the Chief Operation Officer since 2010. She received her civil industrial engineering degree from the University of Chile. Between 2009 and 2010, she performed as Manager of Operational Projects for AFP Provida and previously between 2008 and 2009 she performed as Benefit Administration Manager for AFP Provida.
Andrés Veszprémy Schilling is the General Counsel since 2012. He received a law degree from the University of Chile and a Master of Laws in International Legal Studies from the American University in the United States of America. From April 2009 and prior to such appointment, he served as Manager of the Legal Corporate Area of BBVA Chile Group, and prior to such designation, he had also served as General Counsel of AFP Provida since 2002 until March 2009.
Pablo Villalobos Astudillo is the Audit Manager since 2012. He received his statistic degree and general accountant degree from the University of Chile. Between 2006 and 2012, he served as Manager in the following areas: Branch Audit Manager, Credit Risk and Special Audits in the BBVA Bank.
Marco Rivera Araya is Human Resources Manager since 2012. He received a commercial engineering from University of Santiago of Chile.
María Paz Yáñez Macías is the Planning & Control Division Manager since 2002. She received a commercial engineering degree from the Catholic University of Chile.
Juan Sepúlveda Parra is the Pensions Accounting Division Manager since 2007. He received his general accountant degree in Santiago, Chile. Between 1992 and 2007, he served as the Chief of the Accounting Department of Fund Account for AFP Provida.
Iván Baeza Galaz is the Pensions Marketing Division Manager since 2007. He received a civil industrial engineering degree from University of Chile. Between 1999 and 2007, he served as the Chief of the Commercial Development Department for AFP Provida.
The per diem compensation paid by Provida to all Directors during the fiscal year 2012 was an aggregate of MCh$543, a 4.7% decrease year-over-year. The detail of per diem paid in 2012 was as follows:
Directors | Per Diem |
(MCh$) | |
Joaquín Cortez Huerta | 68 |
Jesús del Pino Durán | 68 |
Jorge Marshall Rivera | 68 |
María Cristina Bitar Maluk | 69 |
Luis Ferreres Crespo | 69 |
Francesc Jorda Carré | 68 |
José Martos Vallecillos | 69 |
Osvaldo Puccio Huidobro | 48 |
Jorge Granic Latorre(1) | 16 |
Total | 543 |
(1) Mr. Jorge Granic Latorre received per diem amounts during the year 2012 until cessation of his service as Director on May 14, 2012.
None of the Directors have service contracts with the Company or any of its subsidiaries that grant benefits to Directors for their services to the Company.
The aggregate compensation of Provida’s senior management during fiscal year 2012, including 23 managers (area and division), 13 deputy managers and 13 department chiefs, was MCh$3,911. Severance payments made during 2012 to all executives who left the Company for different reasons totaled MCh$139.
The Company has maintained the plan of variable incentives known as “Direction Oriented to Results” (DOR) currently implemented for managers and department chiefs. This evaluation system is focused on the employees’ reaching certain quantitative and tactical objectives previously set for each executive. Its payment is conditioned on the level of specific goal achieved and the contribution made by each executive, which is calculated using a methodological evaluating process.
Provida is subject to strict norms of corporate governance established by Chilean law, to applicable regulations, and to the policies, rules and conduct code ruling its activity. Provida is administered by a Board of Directors that ordinarily meets once a month. In accordance with the Company’s by-laws, the Board of Directors consists of seven regular members and two alternate members elected for a two-year term in the Ordinary Shareholders’ meeting. Cumulative voting is permitted for the election of Directors. Under Chilean law, a company’s executive officers may not serve as such company’s directors. As a result, Provida’s Board consists entirely of “non-executive” directors.
The Pension Reform Law incorporates additional limitations over executives that might be designed as directors of AFPs and the requirement that at least two of the Board of the Directors’ members be considered as autonomous. Since October 2008, Directors and/or executives of other AFPs, banks or financial institutions, stock exchanges, stock intermediaries, administrators of investments funds, administrators of mutual funds or insurance companies may not be appointed to assume as Directors of an AFP. Either those Directors of other companies, foreign or local, that belong to the business conglomerate, may not be appointed as Director of an AFP. A Director will be considered as autonomous when he or she has no relationship with the AFP, the other corporations of the conglomerate of which he or she takes part in, its controlling shareholder, and principal executives of any of such companies that might generate a potential conflict of interest or hinder his/her independence from the conglomerate.
As a consequence of modifications introduced by Law Nº20,382 regarding Corporate Governance in the Chilean Corporation Law, Directors of Corporations, such as AFPs, complying with certain requirements must also meet independence criteria instructed by this law, similar to those criteria established in Law Nº 20,255 –Pension Reform Law- in relation to the autonomous nature of a Director. Two of the current Directors of Provida meet the requirements of autonomy and independence as per the applicable Chilean Law.
Directors’ Committee |
The concept of a “Directors’ Committee” was introduced by Law N° 19,705 passed on December 2001 (which regulates public share offerings and conflicts of interest) and Circular 1,956 passed in February 2001 by the SVS. At the Board of Directors’ meeting held on May 29, 2001, Provida elected the members for its first committee, starting meetings on the same date. This committee assumed functions formerly carried out by the Audit Committee.
At the beginning of 2010, the Law Nº20,382 on Corporate Governance become effective, which modified the Chilean Corporation Law by instructing the Corporations satisfying certain requirements appointed in such law, to have a Directors’ Committee composed of three members, with a majority being independent. In this context, during the Ordinary Shareholders’ meeting held on April 29, 2011, Provida elected the new members of the Directors’ Committee; two of them met the requirement of independence as determined by the applicable Chilean laws.
Under Provida’s by-laws and Chilean Corporation Law, the responsibilities of the Directors’ Committee include: proposing external auditors; examining reports made by the external auditing firm; approving additional services to be provided by the external auditing firm; analyzing reports made by the Controller Division of Provida; reviewing resolutions and notes issued by regulatory organizations; reviewing the report on the implementation of financial controls; reviewing and evaluating the plan by Provida’s Audit Division for the year and analyzing information in connection with operations included in articles 147 et seq. of Law N° 18,046 for Corporations, suggesting approval of transactions with related parties that shall be laid under their knowledge.
The members of the Directors’ Committee are elected by the Board of Directors. For the fiscal year 2012, the Directors’ Committee consisted of Mr. Jesús del Pino Durán, who was also designated as the “financial expert” of the
Directors’ Committee; Mrs. María Cristina Bitar Maluk and Mr. Jorge Marshall Rivera. This Committee met 15 times in 2012 during which meetings, the following persons were also in attendance: the Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Ricardo Rodriguez; the Responsible Controller, the Committee Secretary, and occasionally, the partners of the external auditing firm, Deloitte and managers of the various AFP Provida Divisions.
During the fiscal year 2012, the Directors’ Committee incurred in expenses amounting to MCh$140 additional to those expenses in relation to the compensation of its members. The total fees paid in 2012 for participation in the Directors’ Committee was as follows:
Fees | |
Directors | (MCh$) |
Jorge Marshall Rivera | 28 |
María Cristina Bitar Maluk | 28 |
Jesús del Pino Durán | 25 |
Total | 81 |
Committee of Investment and Conflict of Interest Resolution of AFP Provida’s Board of Directors
AFP Provida S.A. has a Committee of Investment and Conflict of Interest Resolution that is comprised by the directors Mr. Joaquín Cortez Huerta, Mrs. María Cristina Bitar Maluk and Mr. Jorge Marshall Rivera.
Among its functions are: designing an investment policy and a risk profile for each fund type; supervising the implementation of the investment policy approved by the Board of Directors and the investment limits on pension funds established by law; reviewing objectives, policies and procedures with respect to the administration of risk in pension fund investments; examining information regarding the performance of pension funds investing in derivative instruments, foreign investments (equities, fixed income and currencies) and related companies, and issuing an annual report for the Board of Directors regarding such performance; approving the investment in new kinds of assets; allocating assets of each fund type, with special emphasis when allocating assets in the different geographic sectors; granting extraordinary authorization to depart from the investment policy defined by the Board of Directors and other relevant matters.
The Pension Reform Law requires that administrators must establish investment policies for each of the pension fund types administered by them, which will be elaborated by the Board of Directors. In addition, administrators must have a policy to deal with conflicts of interest, which is approved by the administrators’ Board of Directors. Administrators submit, as only one document, a copy of the Policy of Investment and of the Deal with Conflicts of Interest to the User Commission and the Superintendency of Pensions, which publishes it on its website.
The policy to deal with conflicts of interest must, in general terms, address the following matters: (i) internal control rules and procedures that ensure an appropriate management and resolution of conflicts of interest that might affect directors, managers, administrators, and principal executives of the administrator; (ii) confidentiality and the handling of confidential information; and (iii) requirements and procedures for the election of candidates for director positions in corporations in which the pension funds invest.
Significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards
Provida’s corporate governance practices are regulated by Chilean law (in particular, Ley sobre Sociedades Anónimas, Law N° 19,705 approved in December 2001, regulating public offerings of securities and governing conflicts of interests; Law N° 20,382 of the Chilean Securities Exchange Act regarding corporate governance standards of public companies which reformed the Chilean Corporation Law and the Chilean Securities Exchange Act; Note N° 1,526 passed in February 2001 by the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance and the Pension Reform Law N° 20,255, among others) in addition to Provida’s by-laws. Since Provida has securities registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), it is
subject to the Corporate Governance standards applicable to “foreign private issuers” (as defined under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the “Exchange Act”) listed on the NYSE.
In general, foreign private issuers may comply with the corporate governance practices applicable to them in their local jurisdiction instead of the standards required under the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards set out in Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. However, foreign private issuers listed on the NYSE must comply with Sections 303A.06, 303A.11 and 303A.12 (b) and (c) of such manual.
Sections 303A.11 requires that foreign private issuers disclose any significant differences in which their corporate governance practices differ from the standards applicable to domestic companies under NYSE listing standards. For the purposes of Section 303A.11, the relevant differences between the corporate governance practices followed by Provida and the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards for U.S. companies are as follows:
NYSE Corporate Governance Standard applicable to domestic listed companies | Corporate governance standards applicable to Provida under Chilean law |
Section 303A.01 requires that a majority of the directors of a listed company be independent, such independence being determined in accordance with the criteria in the Section 303A.02. | Under Section 303A.00 Provida is permitted to follow Chilean law in lieu of the relevant Corporate Governance Standard. The Pension Reform Law (Law N° 20,255) establishes that a board of directors must be composed of a minimum of five directors, two of them being considered as “autonomous” according to the criteria established in the Pension Reform Law. Each autonomous Director must have an Alternate Director that satisfies the autonomy requirements established for regular Directors. The Law N°20,382 regarding Corporate Governance also establishes the independence criteria that a Director of a Chilean Open Corporation must satisfy. |
Section 303A.02 sets out the criteria to determine directors’ independence (no director qualifies as “independent” unless, among other things, the board of directors affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the listed company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company). The board of directors must express its opinion regarding the independence of each director on a case-by-case basis. | Under Section 303A.00 Provida is permitted to follow Chilean law in lieu of the relevant Corporate Governance Standard. Law N°20,382 introduced improvements to regulations regarding corporate governance standards. Such improvements amended the Chilean Corporation Law, where the independence criteria that a Director of a Chilean Open Corporation must satisfy, are similar to those criteria established in Law N° 20,255 Pension Reform Law. These criteria are described as follows: The Pension Reform Law (Law N° 20,255) establishes that a director will be considered “independent” when he or she has no relationship with the AFP, the other corporations of the corporate group to which the AFP belongs, its controlling shareholder, and the principal executives of any of the group companies that might generate a potential conflict of interest or hinder his/her independence. The standards of independence according to the Pension Reform Law are substantially similar to those under the NYSE Corporate Governance Standard. It also establishes that directors and/or executives of an AFP may not be appointed as directors and/or executives of other AFPs, banks or financial institutions, stock exchanges, stock intermediaries, administrators of investments funds, administrators of mutual funds or |
NYSE Corporate Governance Standard applicable to domestic listed companies | Corporate governance standards applicable to Provida under Chilean law |
insurance companies. Additionally, directors of Chilean or foreign corporations belonging to the same corporate group as the AFP may not be appointed as directors of the AFP. |
Section 303A.03 requires that non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled sessions without management. | Under Section 303A.00 Provida is permitted to follow Chilean law in lieu of the NYSE Corporate Governance Standard. Under Chilean law, a company’s executive officers may not serve on such company’s board of directors. As a result, Provida’s Board of Directors consists entirely of “non-management” directors, making separate “non-management” meetings unnecessary. |
Section 303A.04 requires that listed companies have a nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors. | Under Section 303A.00 Provida is permitted to follow Chilean law in lieu of the relevant NYSE Corporate Governance Standard. Provida does not have a nominating-corporate governance committee because neither the applicable Chilean Law nor Provida’s by-laws provide for this requirement. Provida’s shareholders have the right to make director nominations at the ordinary shareholders’ meeting. |
Section 303A.05(a) requires listed companies have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. Under Section 303A.05(b), the compensation committee must have a written charter that addresses the committee’s purpose and responsibilities which, at a minimum, are those set out in Section 303A.05(b)(i). In addition, amendments approved by the NYSE in January 2013 require the charter to specify the rights and responsibilities of the compensation committee regarding the authority to retain advisers and to provide funding for such advisers. Certain specified factors must be considered regarding such advisers’ independence from management. | Under Section 303A.00 Provida is permitted to follow Chilean law in lieu of the relevant NYSE Corporate Governance Standard. Provida has no compensation committee because neither the applicable Chilean Law nor Provida’s by-laws require this. |
NYSE Corporate Governance Standard applicable to domestic listed companies | Corporate governance standards applicable to Provida under Chilean law |
Under Section 303A.06, the audit committee must satisfy the requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. | According to the current Chilean Corporation Law, Chilean Open Corporations with an equity market value equal to or greater than UF 1,500,000, and where at least 12.5% of its total voting shares are held by individual shareholders controlling or owning less than 10% of voting shares, must have a Directors’ Committee, as the case of Provida. In conformity with such Law, the Directors’ Committee must be comprised by three members, with a majority satisfying the independence requirement. In the Board of Directors’ meeting held on May 29, 2001, Provida’s Board elected its first Directors’ Committee. This Committee assumed the functions of the former Auditing Committee required existing under the Chilean Law, and it has two independent Directors. Provida’s Directors’ Committee currently satisfies the requirements established in the current Chilean Corporation Law, as well as the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Additionally, Law N° 20,255 requires the formation of a Committee of Investments and Conflicts of Interests Resolution, which must be composed of three directors, at least two of whom must be independent, and one of the independent directors must be Chairman of the Committee. |
Under Section 303A.07(a), the audit committees of listed companies are subject to additional requirements, such as knowledge in finances and at least one of its members must have experience in accounting or financial matters. Section 303A.07(b) requires that the audit committee members must satisfy the requirements for independence set out in Section 303A.02. Section 303A.07(c) requires that the audit committee must have a written charter that addresses the duties and responsibilities of the audit committee which, at a minimum, must include those set out in Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and under Section 303A.07(c). Section 303A.07(d) requires that each listed company have an internal audit department to provide management, and the audit committee with ongoing assessments of the Company’s risk management processes and system of internal control. | Under Section 303A.00 Provida is permitted to follow Chilean law in lieu of the relevant NYSE Corporate Governance Standard. Under Chilean law, our Directors’ Committee has assumed the functions of the former Audit Committee and it is not required to meet the additional requirements set out in Section 303A.07. All members of Provida’s Directors’ Committee currently satisfy the “independence” requirement of members established in Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. Duties and responsibilities of the Directors’ Committee are established in the Chilean corporation law, including: the election of external auditors, the review of reports made by the external auditing firm, the approval of additional services rendered by the external auditing firm, the analysis made by Provida’s Audit Division, the review of Resolutions and Notes issued by regulatory organizations and the approval of transactions with related parties. Provida’s Audit Division provides ongoing reports to management and the Directors’ Committee regarding risk management and internal control processes of Provida. |
NYSE Corporate Governance Standard applicable to domestic listed companies | Corporate governance standards applicable to Provida under Chilean law |
Under Section 303A.08, shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity-compensation plans and material revisions thereto. | Under Section 303A.00 Provida is permitted to follow Chilean law in lieu of the relevant NYSE Corporate Governance Rule. Under Chilean law, Provida’s compensation policies do not provide for equity compensation of the same issuance. Thus, shareholder approval is not currently necessary. However, shareholders would not be entitled to vote if the Company were to choose to implement an equity compensation plan in the future. |
Under Section 303A.09, listed companies must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. Likewise, the board of directors should evaluate the performance of its functions and its committees at least once a year. | Under Section 303A.00 Provida is permitted to follow Chilean law in lieu of the relevant NYSE Corporate Governance Rule. The Company follows the rules regarding the disclosure of corporate governance guidelines established by Chilean Law. Chilean law does not require that boards of directors evaluate the performance of their functions. |
Under Section 303A.10, listed companies must adopt and disclose a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for directors and employees and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers. | Under Section 303A.00 Provida is permitted to follow Chilean law in lieu of the relevant NYSE Corporate Governance Rule. The Company has a Code of Conduct which governs the Company’s business conduct and ethics for directors and employees. See “Item 16B. Code of Ethics.” |
The above description of the differences between the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards and the corporate governance practices applicable to Provida under Chilean Law is included in an English version on our website at www.bbvaprovida.cl.
The following chart sets out Provida’s organizational structure and the numbers of its employees for each major operational area as of December 31, 2012:
Total number of employees as of December 31, 2012:1,740 employees
The daily operations of Provida are supervised by the Chief Executive Officer. The executives that report directly to the CEO are the Marketing and Sales Area Officer, the Investment Area Officer, the Operational and Systems Area Officer, the Risk Division Manager, the Planning & Control Manager, the Pension Marketing Division Manager, the Pension Account Division Manager and the Human Resources Division Manager. The Audit Manager is under control of the Directors and reports to the Corporate Audit Unit.
As of December 31, 2012, Provida had 1,740 employees, 717 of which were members of the sales force, representing 41% of Provida’s total staff. As of December 31, 2011, Provida had 1,350 employees, 429 of which were members of the sales force, representing 32% of Provida’s total staff. As of December 31, 2010, Provida had 1,334 employees, of which 444 were members of the sales force, representing 33% of its total staff.
Labor relationships |
Provida’s employees are represented by two labor unions. El Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de AFP Provida (“Labor Union N° 1”) was established in 1986. Its membership represented 35.6% of the Company’s total employees as of December 31, 2012, of which 480 were sales agents and the rest corresponded to administrative staff. The second labor union, El Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores Administrativos de AFP Provida (“Labor Union N° 2”) was established in 1997 and its members are only administrative employees representing 21.7% of the Company’s total employees as of December 31, 2012.
In January, 2013 a new collective bargaining agreement was executed between Provida and Labor Union Nº1, which resulted in a collective agreement that will be in effect until January 31, 2015. The collective bargaining with Labor Union N°2 was executed in 2010 and the agreement is effective until December 31, 2013.
The number of shares owned by Provida’s Directors and Executive Officers as of December 31, 2012 is the following:
Name of shareholder | Position | Number of shares of common stock owned |
Carlo Ljubetic Rich | Officer | 28,589 |
Provida is a publicly traded Chilean corporation with equity divided into 331,316,623 shares of common stock, in nominative registered form, with no par value and each share of common stock representing the right to one vote. Since July 1, 1999, Provida has been controlled by its major shareholder Inversiones Previsionales S.A. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A.) and its predecessor BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A. (also a wholly-owned subsidiary of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A.), which owns 51.62% of issued shares in the Company but has no special voting rights.
The remaining subscribed and paid shares (other than those held directly by BBVA, S.A. through American Depositary Shares) are distributed between small local and foreign investors, including executives of Provida who each have an individual participation lower than 1% of the issued share capital. No major shareholder has special voting rights.
As of March 31, 2013, share ownership was as follows: |
Name of shareholder | Number of shares of common stock owned | Percentage of ownership | ||||||
Inversiones Previsionales S.A. (1) | 171,023,573 | 51.62 | % | |||||
The Bank of New York (2) | 83,610,450 | 25.24 | % | |||||
Penta Corredores de Bolsa S.A. (3) | 8,523,420 | 2.57 | % | |||||
Larraín Vial Corredora de Bolsa S.A. | 7,631,527 | 2.30 | % | |||||
Banco de Chile | 6,171,379 | 1.86 | % | |||||
BCI Corredores de Bolsa S.A. | 5,009,928 | 1.51 | % | |||||
Directors and executive officers | 28,589 | 0.01 | % |
(1) | Corporation incorporated in Chile and whose major shareholder is Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, Spain. For more information, see“Item 4. Information on Provida—A. History and development—Recent developments”. |
(2) | Depositary Bank of ADS, Banco Itaú acting as custodian. |
(3) | Financial services holding company including broker-dealer functions. Penta Corredores de Bolsa S.A. was not a significant holder of Provida shares as of December 31, 2008, and according to public filings, began to acquire Provida shares in the second quarter of 2009. Information on the purpose of its acquisitions, including whether its holdings are for its own account or those of its customers, is not publicly available. |
Article 89 of the Chilean Corporation Law requires that a Chilean company’s transactions with related parties be on a market basis or on similar terms to those usually prevailing in the market. Directors and executive officers who violate Article 89 are liable for losses to the Company resulting from such violation. In addition, Title XVI of the Chilean Corporation Law regulates the approval of transactions with related parties. Violations of such regulations may result in administrative or criminal penalties and personal liability to the Company, shareholders or third parties that may have suffered losses as a result of such violation. All of these transactions have been made in compliance with the requirements of Articles 89 and Title XVI of the Chilean Corporation Law.
In recent years, Provida has entered into transactions with companies under common control belonging to the BBVA Group (the “BBVA Group”) including BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A., BBVA Corredores de Bolsa S.A., BBVA Chile S.A., BBVA Compañía de Seguros de Vida S.A., Servicios de Administración Previsional S.A., Unemployment Funds Administrator of Chile S.A., BBVA Bancomer Servicios S.A, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (Spain), BBVA Servicios Corporativos Ltda., BBVA Corredora Técnica S.A.and Aplica Soluciones Tecnológicas Chile Ltda.
BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A. The transactions entered into with this entity related to the licensing by BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A. of the software used in most operating and administrative processes (Unified Platform) and maintenance services, both corrective and developing, of the Unified Platform used in the Maintenance Center of BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A. The two parties also entered into a lease agreement of offices and self-service centers.
BBVA Corredores de Bolsa S.A. is a subsidiary of BBVA Chile S.A. BBVA Group is the main shareholder of both Provida and BBVA Corredores de Bolsa S.A. The transactions with this entity are financial services rendered to Provida.
BBVA Chile S.A. There is a relationship through the major common shareholder of the BBVA Group. The transactions between Provida and this entity include lease agreements, collection services savings withdrawals and pension payments, overdraft lines, loans and bank current accounts.
BBVA Compañía de Seguros de Vida S.A. This entity is part of the BBVA Group. On January 1, 2005, BBVA Compañía de Seguros de Vida S. A. was awarded the bidding of Provida’s life and disability insurance until June, 2009. This contract was amended in September 2010 regarding the applicable measurement period. See “Item 10. Additional Information—C. Material Contracts.”
Servicios de Administración Previsional S.A. is a company in which Provida has a 37.9% equity interest. PreviRed.com renders certain services to Provida, where the most important service is the electronic collection. The other services are referred to young workers subsidies, DNPA (declaration of non-payment) services, password administration, data processing and technological services, report SAS 70 and monitoring services.
Sociedad Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía Chile S.A. (“AFC”) This is a subsidiary in which Provida has a 37.8% equity interest and together with the other shareholders of this entity have guaranteed this entity’s debt in the aggregate amount of UF 400,000, of which Provida has guaranteed MCh$3,371 (approximately MUS$7) in proportion to its equity interest in AFC. This guarantee is required under certain of AFC’s credit agreements, specifically those in relation to guaranty bills and promissory notes. On February 4, 2010, the Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía reimbursed the Company with bank guarantee letters for an amount of UF 160,000 (MCh$3,655). Moreover, the guarantee of UF 240,000 (MCh$5,482) expired on April 25, 2013. However, on March 26, 2013, Sociedad Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía replaced it, establishing a new maturity date on January 31, 2014, and it did not consider shareholders as sureties, warrantors or joint co-signers. In addition, Provida is paid by AFC for rendering technological support and technological advisory services.
The contract subscribed with Sociedad Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía S.A. will end in October 2013, once Sociedad Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía S.A. II begins its operations. AFP Provida will not hold equity interest in such entity.
BBVA Bancomer Servicios S.A. There is a relationship through the major common shareholder of the BBVA Group. From 2005, this entity has rendered data processing services in the Processing Center, BBVA Bancomer Services in
Mexico, for the Company and its pension funds. This contract was transferred to the company Aplica Tecnologia Avanzada S.A., as a result of the merger between BBVA Bancomer and BBVA Bancomer Servicios S.A.
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. There is a relationship through the major common shareholder of the BBVA Group. On December 16, 2009 a contract was entered into related to services of data processing outsourcing, advisory and maintenance of terminals and help-desk.
BBVA Servicios Corporativos Ltda. There is a relationship through the major common shareholder of the BBVA Group. On January 1, 2010 a contract was entered into for the externalization of Provida’s services. The contract will have a duration of 10 years, renewable for periods of 10 years. This contract was amended in September 2012 in terms of fees and duration, becoming permanent, but any of the parties could early terminate the contract if the BBVA Group were no longer the controller of AFP Provida. Additionally, the contract is not considered material to Provida.
Aplica Soluciones Tecnológicas Chile Ltda. There is a relationship through the major common shareholder of the BBVA Group. On January 4, 2010 a contract was entered into related to the design and development of software system.
For the fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010, details of the related party transactions were disclosed in Note 11 to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Company | Transaction | Amount of transactions | Effect on revenues (expense) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||||||||||
BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A. | Purchase of software license Software License | 2,832 | 2,832 | 3,578 | (566 | ) | (566 | ) | (610 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Software Maintenance Service (CMA) | - | - | 73 | - | - | (73 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Office Rental | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Self service dispenser lease | 107 | 114 | 40 | (107 | ) | (114 | ) | (40 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
BBVA Corredores de Bolsa S.A. | Financial services | 62 | 169 | 163 | (62 | ) | (169 | ) | (163 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
BBVA Chile S.A. | Rentals (agencies, BBVA Tower) | 1,211 | 1,250 | 1,588 | 1,211 | 1,250 | 1,588 | |||||||||||||||||||
Rentals (agencies, Huérfanos and Bandera Tower) | 520 | 518 | 543 | (520 | ) | (518 | ) | (543 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Community fees as lessor | 33 | 167 | 248 | 33 | 167 | 248 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Community fees as lessee | 96 | 210 | 76 | (96 | ) | (210 | ) | (76 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Pension payment service | 7 | 26 | 161 | (7 | ) | (26 | ) | (161 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Collection contract | - | 4 | 3 | - | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Expense for bank account maintenance | 3 | 1 | 46 | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | (46 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Savings payment service | 11 | 50 | 80 | (11 | ) | (50 | ) | (80 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cash payment service | 4 | - | - | (4 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of real estate | 1,997 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of real estate | (966 | ) | - | - | 1,005 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
BBVA Compañía de Seguros de Vida S.A. | Premiums paid and provisioned | 329 | 370 | 649 | (329 | ) | (370 | ) | (649 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Casualty rate provision | (4,047 | ) | (3,031 | ) | 1,690 | 4,047 | 3,031 | (1,690 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Financial revenue provision | 953 | 2,151 | 7,126 | 953 | 2,159 | 7,126 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Insurance settlement | 2,604 | 990 | 933 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Servicio de Administración Previsional S.A. | Electronic collection service | 1,620 | 1,624 | 1,517 | (1,620 | ) | (1,624 | ) | (1,517 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Young worker subsidy | 17 | 15 | 11 | (17 | ) | (15 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
DNPA (declaration of non-payment) service | 44 | 94 | 85 | (44 | ) | (94 | ) | (85 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Password administration | 128 | 166 | 73 | (128 | ) | (166 | ) | (73 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Data processing | 28 | 147 | 519 | (28 | ) | (147 | ) | (519 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
File transference | 9 | 14 | 12 | (9 | ) | (14 | ) | (12 | ) |
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technological services | 3 | 5 | 7 | (3 | ) | (5 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
SAS 70 report | - | (11 | ) | 12 | - | 11 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
MAC Service | - | 24 | - | - | (24 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Monitoring Service | - | 1 | - | - | (1 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía Chile S.A. | Technological consulting and services | 269 | 219 | 235 | 269 | 219 | 235 | |||||||||||||||||||
Technological Supportive Services | 86 | 271 | 455 | 86 | 271 | 455 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loans in current account | - | - | (84 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Aplica Tecnología Avanzada S.A. (former BBVA Bancomer Servicios S.A.) | Data Processing | 1,481 | 1,428 | 1,143 | (1,481 | ) | (1,428 | ) | (1,143 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. | AFP technological platform service | 26 | 57 | 43 | (26 | ) | (57 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
BBVA Servicios Corporativos Ltda. | Outsourcing services for corporate support | 3,943 | 5,102 | 5,524 | (3,943 | ) | (5,102 | ) | (5,524 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Office rentals | 503 | 491 | 479 | 503 | 491 | 479 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common Charges as lessee | 21 | 21 | 35 | 21 | 56 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||||
BBVA Corredora Técnica de Seguros Ltda. | Rental of branch offices | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Aplica Soluciones Tecnológicas Chile Ltda. | Software development | 655 | 412 | 73 | (15 | ) | (36 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Technological services | 51 | - | - | (51 | ) | - | - |
During the fiscal year 2012, the Board of Directors, with the recommendation of the Directors’ Committee, approved the following transactions with related parties. All of these transactions were entered into similar terms and conditions to those prevailing in the market.
- | In the Extraordinary Meeting held on August 31, 2012, the Board of Directors approved the internalization of most of the support services subcontracted to the related party BBVA Servicios Corporativos Limitada on December 31, 2009. The annual cost of services maintained, was reduced from UF 241,109.04 (MCh$5,439) to UF 41,932.01 (MCh$946). |
- | In the Ordinary Meeting held on October 24, 2012, the Board of Directors approved the reciprocal purchase and sale with BBVA Chile S.A., of a group of branches used as lessee and that are owned by the other company. In detail, it is a total of 11 branch offices of which six are owned by Provida and occupied by BBVA Chile as lessee, and five are owned by BBVA Chile and occupied by Provida as lessee. |
According to the above, the six properties owned by Provida and sold to BBVA Chile are the following:
1.- Branch office located at 402, 21 de Mayo street, Arica city.
2.- Branch office located at 1055, Aldunate street, Coquimbo city.
3.- Branch office located at 1047, Arturo Prat street, San Felipe city.
4.- Branch office located at 2711, Irrarázaval Avenue, Ñuñoa, Santiago city.
5.- Branch office located at 220, San Antonio street, Santiago city.
6.- Branch office located at 1121, Uno Poniente street, Talca city.
Likewise, the five properties owned by BBVA Chile and acquired by Provida are as follows:
1.- Branch office located at 366, Colón street, Arica city.
2 - Branch office located at 570, Colipí street, Copiapó city.
3.- Branch office located at 43, José Pedro Alessandri street, Ñuñoa, Santiago city.
4.- Branch office located at 492, Colón street, Los Ángeles city.
5.- Branch office located at 521/533, Independencia street, Valdivia city.
According to the assessment made by the consulting company CBRE for each property, the market value of the six branches owned by Provida is equivalent to UF 134,420 (MCh$3,070). Likewise, the market value of the five branches owned by BBVA Chile is equivalent to UF 87,840 (MCh$2,006).
- | In the Ordinary Meeting held on November 21, 2012, the Board of Directors approved the new fee for the Data Processing Contract with Aplica Tecnología Avanzada S.A. de C.V. (ATA) for 2013. The price of the services for the year 2013 will be ThUS$3,170 plus taxes, similar to the fee of 2012 that was ThUS$3,098. |
Additionally, the Board of Directors was informed that certain obstacles to the sale of the properties located in the cities of Arica and San Felipe were encountered. Therefore, in both cases promise of sale agreements were signed until such obstacles are solved. The market price of the four properties actually sold by Provida is equal to UF 86,669 (MCh$ 1,980).
- | In the Extraordinary Meeting held on November 27, 2012, the Board of Directors, as well as the Extraordinary Shareholders’ meeting of Provida Internacional held on the same date, approved the sale of 100% shares representative of the share capital of the Mexican society Administradora de Fondos para el Retiro Bancomer, S.A. de C.V. (AFORE Bancomer), to Afore XXI Banorte, SA de CV, a Mexican Retirement Funds Administrator. The total price would be MUS$1,600 plus an adjustment for an estimated excess cash flow of MUS$125. |
None. |
See “Item 3. Key information—A. Selected Financial Data” and “Item 18. Financial Statements” and other financial information filed with this annual report.
Dividends and dividend policy
At the Ordinary Shareholders’ meeting held on April 30, 2010, the Board of Directors announced its intention to pay a dividend for the fiscal year 2010 for an amount equivalent to 75% of Provida’s net profit, a proposal that was approved in the Ordinary Shareholders’ meeting held on April 29, 2011. At the same meeting, the Board of Directors announced its intention to pay a dividend for the fiscal year 2011 for an amount equivalent to 75% of Provida’s profit. In the Shareholders’ meeting held on April 27, 2012, it was agreed to pay a dividend for the fiscal year 2011 for an amount equivalent to 100% of Provida’s net profit. Finally, at the same meeting, the Board of Directors announced its intention to pay a dividend for the fiscal year 2012 for an amount equivalent to 100% of Provida’s profit, which will be submitted for vote in the Shareholders’ meeting to be held on April 30, 2013.
Dividends per share for each period | |||||||||||||
2012(2) | 2011(3) | 2010 | |||||||||||
Total dividend (Ch$) | 314.00 | 238.00 | 207.40 | ||||||||||
Dividend ratio (1) | 100 | % | 100 | % | 75 | % |
(1) | Annual dividends for the corresponding annual net profit. |
(2) | Dividend to be ratified and approved at the Ordinary Shareholders meeting scheduled for April 30, 2013. |
(3) | In the Extraordinary Shareholders’ meeting held on 27 April 2012, the distribution of 100% of profits for the year 2011 was approved. |
See “Item 4. Information on Provida—A. History and development—Recent developments” for information on recent and pending transactions affecting Provida.
Provida estimates that during 2012, shares of its common stock were traded on nearly all trading days of the Santiago Stock Exchange. The table below shows, for the periods indicated, the quarterly high and low trading prices in pesos per share of common stock listed on the Santiago Stock Exchange, the quarterly high and low trading prices in dollars per ADS traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the high and low trading prices for the last five months in pesos per share of common stock and in dollars per ADS listed on the Santiago Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange, respectively. See “Presentation of Information” for the exchange rates applicable during the periods set out below.
Santiago Stock Exchange | NYSE | |||||||||||||||
(Ch$ per share(1)) | (US$ per ADS(2)) | |||||||||||||||
Period | High | Low | High | Low | ||||||||||||
1st Quarter 2008 | 1,260.00 | 1,065.00 | 37.23 | 35.15 | ||||||||||||
2nd Quarter 2008 | 1,280.00 | 890.00 | 42.44 | 25.53 | ||||||||||||
3rd Quarter 2008 | 1,035.00 | 849.68 | 33.10 | 23.67 | ||||||||||||
4th Quarter 2008 | 904.00 | 560.00 | 24.19 | 12.10 | ||||||||||||
1st Quarter 2009 | 710.00 | 660.00 | 18.50 | 13.52 | ||||||||||||
2nd Quarter 2009 | 967.71 | 700.00 | 25.88 | 18.14 | ||||||||||||
3rd Quarter 2009 | 1,289.40 | 910.00 | 35.75 | 24.06 | ||||||||||||
4th Quarter 2009 | 1,528.00 | 1,270.00 | 45.65 | 34.40 | ||||||||||||
1st Quarter 2010 | 1,700.00 | 1,528.00 | 50.49 | 43.00 | ||||||||||||
2nd Quarter 2010 | 1,733.00 | 1,515.10 | 48.29 | 41.80 | ||||||||||||
3rd Quarter 2010 | 2,037.00 | 1,539.90 | 62.91 | 42.26 | ||||||||||||
4th Quarter 2010 | 2,700.00 | 2,015.00 | 86.91 | 62.91 | ||||||||||||
1st Quarter 2011 | 2,616.50 | 2,204.70 | 80.70 | 67.48 | ||||||||||||
2nd Quarter 2011 | 2,620.00 | 2,199.70 | 82.78 | 69.13 | ||||||||||||
3rd Quarter 2011 | 2,360.50 | 1,800.20 | 76.79 | 56.42 | ||||||||||||
4th Quarter 2011 | 2,331.00 | 1,920.00 | 67.01 | 55.00 | ||||||||||||
1st Quarter 2012 | 2,560.00 | 2,200.00 | 79.00 | 65.99 | ||||||||||||
2nd Quarter 2012 | 2,900.00 | 2,445.00 | 83.78 | 71.51 | ||||||||||||
3rd Quarter 2012 | 3,038.90 | 2,768.00 | 96.47 | 84.24 | ||||||||||||
4th Quarter 2012 | 3,500.00 | 2,935.00 | 111.48 | 92.52 | ||||||||||||
November 2012 | 3,450.00 | 3,290.00 | 108.00 | 102.14 | ||||||||||||
December 2012 | 3,285.00 | 3,160.00 | 104.00 | 98.60 | ||||||||||||
January 2013 | 3,500.00 | 3,273.70 | 111.72 | 104.30 | ||||||||||||
February 2013 | 3,293.80 | 3,190.40 | 104.48 | 101.07 | ||||||||||||
March 2013 | 3,299.60 | 3,261.30 | 106.50 | 102.76 | ||||||||||||
April 15, 2013 | 3,300.00 | 3,235.00 | 104.47 | 103.32 |
Source: Santiago Stock Exchange – Official Quotations Bulletin.
(1) | Pesos per share of common stock reflect the nominal closing price on the trade date. |
(2) | Each ADS represents 15 shares of common stock. |
As of April 15, 2013, the closing trading price for shares of Provida’s common stock listed on the Santiago Stock Exchange was Ch$3,270.00 per share or US$103.90 per ADS, with each ADS representing fifteen shares of the Company’s common stock, converted at the Observed Exchange Rate of Ch$472.10 = US$1.00 in the same date.
As of April 15, 2013, the closing trading price per ADS traded on the New York Stock Exchange was US$103.23 per ADS.
It is not possible for Provida to determine the proportion of ADS beneficially owned by U.S. residents. |
Not applicable. |
General
The Chilean stock markets are sophisticated and developed, reflecting the particular economic history and development of Chile. The Government’s policy of privatization of state-owned companies, implemented during the 1980s, led to an expansion of privately-held shares, resulting in the increased importance of stock markets in Chile regulated by the SVS. Certain elements of Chile’s stock markets, including pension fund investors, are highly regulated with respect to investment and compensation criteria, even though Chile’s stock markets are generally less regulated than U.S. stock markets with respect to disclosure requirements and use of information.
History and description
The Santiago Stock Exchange was established in 1893 and is a private company whose equity consists of 48 shares held by 48 shareholders. As of December 31, 2012, 225 companies had shares listed on the Santiago Stock Exchange, which is the most important exchange in Chile, accounting for 88.50% of all equity traded in Chile. Approximately 10.98% of equity trading is conducted on the Chilean Electronic Stock Exchange, an electronic trading market that was created by banks and brokerage houses, non-members of the Santiago Stock Exchange. The remaining 0.52% of equity is traded on the Valparaíso Stock Exchange.
Equities, investment fund shares, fixed-income securities, short-term and money-market securities, gold and US dollars are traded on the Santiago Stock Exchange. In 1991, the Santiago Stock Exchange introduced a forwards market for two instruments: US dollar futures and Selective Share Price Index (the “IPSA”) futures. In 1994 a stock options market was opened. Equities are traded through an electronic system called Telepregón that operates continuously from 9:30 to 16:30 (Chilean time). The Electronic Stock Exchange of Chile operates continuously from 9:30 to 16:30 (Chilean time) on each business day.
There are two share price indexes for the Santiago Stock Exchange: the General Share Price Index (“IGPA”) and the Selective Share Price Index (“IPSA”). The IGPA is calculated using the prices of shares for more than 180 issuers and is broken into five main sectors: banks and finance, farming and forest products, mining, industrial, and miscellaneous. The IPSA is an index for companies with the greatest market capitalization, which currently includes 40 major companies. Shares covered by the IPSA are weighted according to the value at which the shares traded, and they represent over 69.9% of the entire market capitalization of the stocks traded on the Santiago Stock Exchange. Currently Provida’s shares of common stock are not included in the IPSA index.
The table below summarizes market capitalization, trading volumes and performance indicators for stocks traded on the Santiago Stock Exchange in the last 5 fiscal years:
As of: | Market Capitalization (1) | Annual Trading Volume (1) | IGPA Index (2) | IPSA Index (2) | ||||||||||||
(US$ billion) | (US$ million) | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2008 | 134.10 | 31,789.74 | 230.96 | 263.65 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | 230.40 | 41,493.53 | 339.19 | 397.35 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | 340.50 | 45,988.00 | 468.71 | 547.15 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | 269.25 | 57,332.00 | 410.60 | 463.87 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 | 313.46 | 46,577.00 | 429.78 | 477.62 |
Source: The Santiago Stock Exchange.
(1) US dollar equivalents for the year-end stock market capitalization and trading volume figures are translated at the Observed Exchange Rate for the last day of such period.
(2) Index base = 100 on December 31, 1996.
Volatility
The IPSA has increased at an annual real rate of 7.50% (with a standard deviation of 26.42%) for the period between December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2012. During 2012, the IPSA increased by 2.97% in real terms. As the table below shows, variations in the performance of listed stocks are often significant and reflect the high level of volatility characteristic of the Santiago Stock Exchange:
Real Annual % Change in | ||
Year | IGPA Index | IPSA Index |
2008 | (19.55) | (22.13) |
2009 | 46.86 | 50.70 |
2010 | 38.17 | 37.60 |
2011 | (12.39) | (15.22) |
2012 | 4.67 | 2.97 |
Source: The Santiago Stock Exchange.
Liquidity
As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the market capitalization of equity securities listed on the Santiago Stock Exchange reached US$313.46 billion, US$269.25 billion and US$340.56 billion, respectively. The ten companies with the largest market capitalization on the Santiago Stock Exchange represented 59.9% in 2012, 65.1% in 2011 and 64.3% in 2010 of the IPSA index. The average monthly trading volumes for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, were MUS$3,881, MUS$4,777 and MUS$5,002 respectively.
Foreign ownership
Foreign investment in Chile is governed by Decree Law N° 600 and by the Central Bank Act. Capital and earnings can be remitted through the formal exchange market. Ownership of Chilean shares by foreign investors through an ADS program is regulated by the Central Bank Act and by Chapter XXVI of the Central Bank Act, which does not require a withholding period before remitting capital or earnings abroad. Even though Chapter XXVI was repealed in April 2001, it is still applicable to foreign investment contracts executed before that date (See “Item 10. Additional Information— D. Exchange controls”).
Foreign capital investment funds (“FCIF”) are regulated by Law N° 18,657, and receive preferential tax treatment. FCIFs are required to obtain a favorable report issued by the SVS, in case capital may not be remitted within five years from the date the investment is made, although earnings may be remitted at any time. A FCIF may hold a maximum of 5% of shares in a specific company, although this might be increased if the company issues new shares. Furthermore, no more than 10% of a FCIF’s assets may be invested in one company’s stock, and no more than 25% of the current outstanding shares of any listed company may be owned on a cumulative basis by one FCIF.
Market information
Since November 16, 1994, Provida’s ADS have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “PVD”. Until August 25, 1999, each ADS represented one share of Provida’s common stock, while after the increase in Provida’s issued share capital each ADS came to represent fifteen shares of common stock. Until February 7, 1996, the ADS were deposited with The Chase Manhattan Bank N.A. which acted as depositary. After that date, Provida’s ADS have been deposited with The Bank of New York Mellon as the successor depositary (the “Depositary”).
During the fiscal year 2012, a total of 99,413,921 shares of Provida’s common stock were jointly traded in Chilean Stock markets (the Santiago Stock Exchange, the Valparaíso Stock Exchange and the Electronic Stock Exchange) and the New York Stock Exchange, amounting to 30.0% of the Company’s shares of common stock.
In 2012, the value of trades of Provida’s stock listed on the Chilean stock market was MCh$172,546 (approximately MUS$361), higher by 43.7% with respect to the figure recorded for the previous year, and the value of trades of Provida’s stock listed on the New York Stock Exchange was MUS$237, lower by 19.9% with respect to the figure for 2011. In total, trades had a value of MCh$285,781 (MUS$597), equivalent to 273.4% of the Company’s paid-in capital.
The breakdown by each stock exchange for the fiscal year 2012 is as follows: |
- | A total of 48,166,405 shares of Provida’s common stock were traded on the Santiago Stock Exchange for a total value of MCh$141,455. The average price reached was Ch$2,937 per share. |
- | A total of 11,133,615 shares of Provida’s common stock were traded on the Electronic Stock Exchange for a total of MCh$30,834. |
- | A total of 94,096 shares of Provida’s common stock were traded on the Valparaíso Stock Exchange for a total of MCh$257. |
- | A total of 2,667,987 ADS (1 ADS representing 15 shares of Provida’s common stock) were traded on the New York Stock Exchange for a total of MUS$237. |
Not applicable. |
Not applicable. |
Not applicable. |
Not applicable. |
Organization and register |
Provida is a corporation organized under the Chilean Corporation Law and under the Decree Law 3,500. Shareholder rights in Chilean corporations are governed by the applicable provisions of the Chilean Corporations Act (“Ley de Sociedades Anónimas 18,046”) such provisions are consistent with or do not conflict with those established in the Decree Law 3,500 and the company’s by-laws, which effectively serve the purpose of both the articles of association or certificate of incorporation and the by-laws of a company incorporated in the United States. The Company’s deed of incorporation was executed on March 3, 1981 and was registered in the Registry of Commerce of Santiago on April 6, 1981, on number 6,060, number 3,268. The last modification to the Company’s by-laws was approved at the Extraordinary Shareholders’ meeting held on April 30, 2009, in which they agreed to modify the composition of the Board of Directors in order to establish that the Company will be administer by a Board of Directors composed of 7 Directors and 2 Alternate Directors. The Company’s current by-laws have been filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
Purpose |
Article 4 of the Company’s amended and restated by-laws establishes its corporate purpose as follows: “the Company’s exclusive purpose is to (i) manage pension funds established by law; (ii) provide and administer the benefits established in the Decree Law 3,500 passed in 1980 and its amendments and those specifically authorized by other present or future legal enactments; (iii) constitute and/or participate, as a complement to its line of business, in related companies pursuant to Article 23 and 23 bis of said Decree Law 3,500; (iv) carry out activities authorized by law constituting and/or participating in related companies or united corporations authorized by law and/or as agreed to by the Superintendency of Pension Fund Administrator and (v) constitute and/or participate in corporations constituted as securities custodian companies under Law 18,876.
Board of Directors |
Provida is administered by a Board of Directors composed of 7 Directors and 2 Alternate Directors. One Alternate Director position is currently vacant. Out of the 7 Directors, two of them shall be considered as autonomous in accordance with Decree Law 3,500. These two Directors considered as autonomous, must have an Alternate Director, being able to replace the respective Director considered as Autonomous and complying with the same requirements Directors hold their position for a term of two years, after which time elections are held, where the members can be reelected. The Board of Directors holds ordinary meetings once a month. The quorum to hold meetings requires the presence of a majority of its members, and all resolutions require majority approval of those present and voting. In addition:
(a) | there are no restrictions in the Company’s by-laws relating to the right of Directors and Officers to vote on a proposal in which there is or might be a conflict of interest. However, under Chilean law, the Board of Directors must decide in advance whether a transaction is intended to contribute to the equity interest, and whether it is suitable in price, terms and conditions than those transactions prevailing in the market, and whether it is in compliance with the rest of requirements determined by the Chilean Corporation Law. Directors, managers, administrators, main executives or liquidators holding equity interests or taking part in negotiations intended to concrete an operation with related parties, shall inform the Board of Directors about that and shall be excluded from voting on the Board’s decisions related to such transaction; |
(b) | the aggregate compensation of the Board of Directors is fixed at an Ordinary Shareholders’ meeting; |
(c) | there are no restrictions in the Company’s by-laws relating to the borrowing powers of Directors; |
(d) | there are no restrictions in the Company’s by-laws setting out age limits or retirement requirements for Directors and Officers; and |
(e) | under the Company’s by-laws, Directors do not need to be shareholders of the Company to be appointed. |
Share capital |
The Company’s share capital is divided into 331,316,623 ordinary shares of common stock, in registered form, of the same and unique series, with no par value. Each ordinary share entitles the holder thereof to one vote and to participate in any distributions by the Company in proportion to the number of shares that they own. Shareholders have pre-emptive rights to subscribe for new shares that may be issued by the Company from time to time in proportion to the shares they hold at the time of the increase of capital. In addition:
(a) | there are no restrictions in the by-laws setting out a time limit for dividend entitlements to lapse. All shares are entitled to equal dividend payments. However, in accordance with the rule currently in force, if five years pass since a dividend was declared and it remains unpaid, the dividend will go to the Chilean Fire Department; |
(b) | there are no restrictions in the by-laws concerning staggered intervals for the re-election of Directors or any articles permitting or requiring cumulative voting; |
(c) | all shareholders have the right to participate in the Company’s net profit. According to its by-laws, the Company is required to distribute an annual cash dividend to all shareholders in proportion to the shares held for a value of at least thirty-percent of that fiscal year’s net profit; |
(d) | in the case of a liquidation (which would be carried out by the Superintendency of Pensions) those pension funds managed by the Company would also be liquidated. As required by law, all shareholders have the same right to participate in any surplus in the case of the Company’s liquidation after having settled all its pending debts; |
(e) | there are no redemption rights under the by-laws; |
(f) | there is no right to a sinking fund under the by-laws; |
(g) | all the Company’s shares are issued and fully paid. Consequently, shareholders are not subject to further capital requirements; |
(h) | there are no restrictions in the Company’s by-laws discriminating against any existing or prospective shareholder as a result of such shareholder owning a substantial number of shares in the Company; |
(i) | the by-laws do not describe any limitation on the rights to own shares in the Company; |
(j) | there are no articles in the by-laws governing the ownership threshold above which a shareholder must disclose his/her shareholding. Nevertheless, as required by law, if as a consequence of any acquisition, a person or group of persons with agreement in acting has or exceeds two thirds of the voting of the Company, shall be forced to make a public offer for the rest of the outstanding shares, within a period and in a way established by the Chilean stock market Law; |
(k) | there are no restrictions in the by-laws imposing more stringent conditions than those required by law to change the capital of the Company. |
In order to modify shareholders’ rights, the by-laws must be amended to reflect such modification. To amend the Company’s by-laws, the pertinent modification must be proposed and approved at the Extraordinary Shareholder’s meeting and subsequently, the Superintendency of Pension shall authorize such amendment by a resolution that must be published in the Official Gazette, as well as in the Register of Business Enterprises.
According to the by-laws, shareholders’ meetings can be ordinary or extraordinary. An ordinary shareholders’ meeting must take place within four months from the close of the relevant fiscal year. Any other shareholders’ meeting is an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting. Generally, the Board of Directors calls shareholders’ meetings; however, these can be called by the Superintendency of Pensions, other institutions authorized by law or by shareholders representing at least 10% of the issued and fully paid share capital. Notice of the meeting must be published in a newspaper of general circulation, in the domicile of the Company three times during three different days.
During 2012 and 2011, Provida did not enter into any material contracts, other than in the ordinary course of business. During 2010, Provida entered into an agreement with BBVA Servicios Corporativos Ltda. (“BBVA Servicios”) related to outsourcing services, described below. Additionally, two contracts entered into in 2004 and 2005, which are currently in force between the parties are also described:
- | On December 31, 2009 with effect and enforcement beginning on January 1, 2010, Provida entered into a contract regarding the outsourcing of services with BBVA Servicios. This contract includes the transfer of Provida's workers who currently render such services; the sale of the necessary tangible assets associated to tasks rendered by such workers necessary to carry out these services; the cessation of contracts with providers, the cessation of certain rental agreements; the real estate and room rentals necessary to its functioning and the subscription of outsourcing service contracts. The contract has a duration of 10 years renewable for periods of 10 years. The annual price was UF 260,530 (MCh$5,951) for the year 2010, which increased in accordance with volume annually at a rate of 3.38%. In the Ordinary Meeting held on February 23, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a reduction of UF 36,110 per year in the service fee paid to BBVA Servicios for the year 2011, with an annual price of UF 233,225.91 (MCh$5,327). |
In the Extraordinary meeting held on August 31, 2012, Provida’s Board of Directors approved an amendment by which BBVA Servicios - Continuadora reduced the services rendered by BBVA Servicios to Provida. As a result, the annual cost of services decreased to UF41,932,01 (MCh$958) and the contract is no longer considered material to Provida. In order to obtain further information on this contract, please see “Item 19. Exhibits — 4.3 Outsourcing Contract between AFP Provida and BBVA Servicios Corporativos Ltda. and — 4.3.1 Amendment dated March 30, 2011”.
- | On December 22, 2004, Provida entered into an insurance agreement with BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A., a participant of Provida, effective from January 1, 2005 until June 30, 2009, pursuant to which Provida took out insurance for its life and disability payment obligations in excess of a certain casualty rate level, as negotiated with BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. Under this agreement, Provida pays all casualties up to the maximum rate specified therein. This insurance agreement was modified by mutual consent of the parties effective as of January 2008 in order to update the mortality tables used to calculate benefits, which increased the cost of the insurance. In July |
2009, the conditions under which the contract operated were modified by mutual consent, taking into consideration that the life and disability insurance constituted a mismatch risk between the assets and liabilities duration arising from such obligation and supported in a change instructed by Superintendency of Securities and Insurance that allowed to maintain a technical reserve valued according to the conditions prevailing in the market. The above implied to modify the calculation of the monthly financial revenues by defining a benchmark to invest assets and establishing that the difference in the return between the defined benchmark and the asset portfolio would be 90% to Provida and 10% to the insurer when the difference was positive and 10% to Provida and 90% to the insurer when the difference was negative. Likewise, it was established that reviews should be made monthly.
During September 2010, BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. requested a revision of its contract with AFP Provida S.A., since there were interpretative differences regarding the review periods, pointing out that the insurer’s idea was to establish reviews over accrued periods through partial settlements made monthly. After considering arguments and making a revision, it was concluded that under the management framework of the insurance contract, it was logical to establish a procedure of accrued reviews with partial settlements that is effective until the last month of the enforcement of the contract. The above implied a new modification of contract in December 2010. For further information on the contract and amendments please see “Item 4—Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Primary expenses” and “Item 5—Operating and financial review and prospects—B. Critical accounting policies—Accounting of life and disability insurance costs” and “Item 19. Exhibits”. |
- | On December 1, 2005, with an amendment in January 2009, Provida entered into a non-exclusive worldwide software licensing contract with BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A. (formerly known as BBVA Pensiones Chile S.A.) pursuant to which Provida licensed from BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A. the intellectual property rights relating to software use, its application on different operating and administrative processes which is the software used in most operating and administrative processes (Unified Platform). During 2012, 2011 and 2010, enhancements for new projects were incorporated amounting to MCh$0, MCh$0, and MCh$746 respectively. Provida paid BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A. amounts for MCh$2,832 in 2012, MCh$2,832 in 2011 and MCh$3,578 in 2010 in connection with the software license. The license contract has an unlimited term and may be terminated by either party by giving twelve months prior notice or if Provida ceases to be part of the BBVA Group. |
The Central Bank is responsible for, among other things, monetary policy and exchange controls in Chile. Appropriate registration of a foreign investment in Chile grants the investor access to the formal exchange market. Foreign investments can be registered with the Foreign Investment Committee under Decree Law N° 600 or can be registered with the Central Bank under the Central Bank Act. The latter is an organic constitutional law requiring a “special majority” vote of the Chilean Congress to be modified.
The Foreign Investment Contract (the “Contract”) among the Central Bank, Provida and the Depositary pursuant to the Central Bank Act – Article 47 – and Chapter XXVI – Compendium of Foreign Exchange Regulations – of the Central Bank, addressed the issue of ADS by a Chilean company. On April 16, 2001, the Central Bank approved a series of amendments to the Compendium of Foreign Exchange Regulations, thereby establishing an entirely new regime. The new Compendium represents the culmination of a deregulation process, which has resulted in the elimination of many of the exchange restrictions established by the former Compendium. Chapter XXVI has been repealed. Notwithstanding, the applicable law that governs the Contract is that in force at the execution of the Contract. Therefore, for the purposes of the Contract, Chapter XXVI is still applicable.
Absent the Contract, under applicable Chilean exchange controls regulations, investors might not be granted access to the formal exchange market for the purpose of converting pesos to dollars and repatriating from Chile the amounts received with respect to deposited shares or shares withdrawn from deposit on surrender of ADS (including amounts received as cash dividends and proceeds from the sale in Chile of the underlying shares and any rights arising therefrom). The following is a summary of certain restrictions contained in the Contract. This summary does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Chapter XXVI, prior to the amendment by the Central Bank on April 16, 2001 and the Contract.
Under Chapter XXVI and the Contract, the Central Bank agreed to grant to the Depositary, on behalf of ADS holders, and to any investor not residing or domiciled in Chile who withdraws shares upon delivery of ADS (such shares being referred to herein as “Withdrawn Shares”), access to the formal exchange market to convert pesos to dollars (and
remit such dollars outside Chile) in respect of shares represented by ADS or Withdrawn Shares. This includes amounts received as (a) cash dividends, (b) proceeds from the sale in Chile of Withdrawn Shares subject to receipt by the Central Bank of a certificate from the holder of the Withdrawn Shares (or from an institution authorized by the Central Bank) that such holder’s residence and domicile are outside Chile and a certificate from a Chilean stock exchange (or from a brokerage or securities firm established in Chile) that indicates that such Withdrawn Shares were sold on a Chilean stock exchange, (c) proceeds from the sale in Chile of rights to subscribe for additional shares, (d) proceeds from the liquidation, merger or consolidation of a company and (e) other distributions, including without limitation those resulting from any re-capitalization, as a result of holding shares represented by ADS or Withdrawn Shares. Transferees of Withdrawn Shares were not entitled to any of the foregoing rights under Chapter XXVI unless the Withdrawn Shares were re-deposited with the Depositary. Under certain circumstances, investors receiving Withdrawn Shares in exchange for ADS had the right to re-deposit such shares.
Chapter XXVI provided access to the formal exchange market in relation to dividend payments provided the company certify to the Central Bank that such dividend payment has been made and any applicable tax has been withheld. Chapter XXVI also provided access to the formal exchange market in relation to the sale of Withdrawn Shares or distributions in relation to such shares. This is conditional upon receipt by the Central Bank of certification from the Depositary that such shares were withdrawn in exchange for ADS and the receipt under a waiver benefit of the Foreign Investment Contract until such Withdrawn Shares were re-deposited.
Chapter XXVI and the Contract provided that a person who brought foreign currency into Chile to purchase shares with the benefit of the Contract had to convert it into pesos on the same date and that person had 5 days within which to invest in shares in order to receive the benefits of the Contract. If such person decided during that period not to acquire shares, the person could access the formal exchange market to re-acquire dollars, provided that the applicable request was presented to the Central Bank within 7 days of the initial conversion into pesos. Shares acquired as described above could be deposited for ADS and the benefits of the Contract received, subject to receipt by the Central Bank of a certificate from the Depositary that such deposit was effected and that the related ADS were issued and receipt by the custodian of a declaration from the person making such deposit waiving the benefits of the Contract with respect to the deposited shares. Both periods mentioned above were modified by the Central Bank on September 20, 1995. Formerly, the period was 60 days for converting dollars into pesos and 90 days from the initial conversion for informing the Central Bank that the person had not acquired shares of common stock and had reacquired dollars.
Access to the formal exchange market under any of the circumstances described above is not automatic. Pursuant to Chapter XXVI, such access requires the approval of the Central Bank based on a request presented through a banking institution established in Chile. The Contract states that if the Central Bank does not act on such request within seven banking days, the request can be deemed approved.
Under current Chilean law, the Contract cannot be unilaterally modified by the Central Bank. However, no assurance can be given that additional Chilean restrictions applicable to ADS holders on disposals of the underlying shares or the repatriation of the proceeds from such disposals could not be imposed in the future, nor can there be any assessment as to the duration or impact such restrictions could have if they were introduced.
Chilean tax considerations
Taxation of dividends. In accordance with Decree Law 824 of 1974 on tax income, as amended, foreign investors domiciled and tax resident abroad are subject to a tax on the gross amount of dividends paid to them, which is generally imposed at a rate of 35% and withheld and paid by the disbursement officer on behalf of the investor (the “Withholding Tax”). Because this tax is a withholding tax, it is not necessary for a foreign investor to submit an income tax statement. Certain taxes paid by the Company (the “First Category Taxes”) with respect to the profits from which the dividends are paid are credited against Withholding Taxes at the time of the withholding. The First Category Tax credit, if available, does not reduce the Withholding Tax on a one for one basis because it also increases the base on which the Withholding Tax is imposed. In addition, if the Company distributes less than all of its distributable income, the credit for First Category Tax paid by the Company is reduced proportionately. The amount of the credit will depend on the tax rates imposed on such profits. The rate of the First Category Tax is 20% in conformity with the Law N°20,630 (1) of September 2012 which fixed the tax rate affecting companies domiciled in Chile.
The example below illustrates the effective Chilean Withholding Tax burden on a cash dividend received by a foreign holder, assuming a Withholding Tax rate of 35%, an effective First Category Tax at the maximum rate of 20.0%, and a distribution of 100% of the Company’s net profit that is distributable after payment of the First Category Tax.
(1) | The Law 20,630 published in the Official Gazette on September 27, 2012, introduces a number of modifications to the Decree Law 824 of 1974, “Income Tax Law”, Decree Law 825 of 1974, “Value Added Tax”, and Decree Law 3,475, “Stamp and Seal Tax”, among others. |
Example: Considering the distribution of profits with a tax of 20% in Ch$
Company taxable profit | 100 | |||
First Category Tax (20% of Ch$100) | (20 | ) | ||
Net distributable profit | 80 | |||
Dividend distributed by the Company | 80 | |||
Increase in Credit for First Category Tax | 20 | |||
Withholding Tax (35% of the Company’s taxable profit plus increase in credit for first category tax) | (35 | ) | ||
Credit for First Category Tax | 20 | |||
Net Withholding Tax | (15 | ) | ||
Net dividend received | 65 | (80 - 15) | ||
Effective dividend Withholding Tax rate | 18.75 | % (15/80) |
The foregoing tax consequences apply to cash dividends paid by the Company to the Depositary as representative of the holders of ADS. Disbursements of such cash dividends by the Depositary to the holders of ADS will not be subject to Chilean taxation. Dividend distributions made in property (other than shares) will be subject to the same Chilean tax rules as cash dividends based on the fair market value of such property. Stock dividends are not subject to Chilean taxation.
Currently there is no income tax treaty between Chile and the United States. A proposed income tax treaty from 2010 is not yet in effect, and there can be no assurance as to whether or when it will enter into force.
Capital gains. Gains from the sale or exchange of ADS (or ADRs evidencing ADS) outside of Chile are not subject to Chilean taxation; however, Law 20,630 of September 2012 introduced amendments to Article 10 of the Income Tax Law regarding the territorial tax regulation that change the rules regarding qualification of income as stemming from a Chilean source. An ADR holder should consider whether this legal amendment affects it.
For companies, gains recognized on a sale or exchange of shares (as distinguished from sales or exchanges of ADS representing such shares) will be subject to a capital gains tax (at a rate of 20.0% for 2011, 2012 and 2013), and an additional tax (the former being creditable against the latter) if: (i) the foreign holder has held the shares for less than one year since exchanging ADS for the shares, (ii) the foreign holder acquired and disposed of the shares in the ordinary course of its business or as a regular trader of shares or (iii) the foreign holder transferred shares of common stock to a related person, as defined in the Chilean tax law. For individuals, gains on the disposition of shares will be subject only to the capital gains tax.
The tax basis of shares received in exchange for ADS is the acquisition value of the shares. The valuation procedure set forth in the Deposit Agreement establishes the value of shares received at the highest price at which they were traded on the Santiago Stock Exchange on the date of the exchange (the “Stock Exchange Price”). Consequently, the conversion of ADS into shares and the immediate sale of such shares for the value established under the Deposit Agreement do not generate a capital gain; therefore, the conversion and sale are not subject to taxation in Chile. It is possible to exchange ADS for shares, but, under Chilean law, it is not possible to exchange shares for ADS.
Moreover, the sale of such shares for a value greater than their Stock Exchange Price, in accordance with amendments incorporated by the Law 20,448(2) of the year 2010, would be subject to tax in Chile, unless the seller complies with certain requirements of Chilean law regarding the Article 107 exemption in conformity with the Chilean income tax law, and the shares have been acquired in a Chilean Stock Exchange expressly authorized by the Securities and Insurance Superintendency. If the seller does not comply with such requirements, the excess of the sale proceeds over the shares’ Stock Exchange Price would be subject to additional taxes at a rate of 35%.
(2) The law 20,448 of 2010 derogated from the article 18ter and incorporated the current article 107 of the income tax law; however, the new text of the article 107 of the income tax law states that, in order to exempt from taxes the greater value from a sale of shares or capital gains, shares should be acquired in a stock exchange in a country authorized by the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance. In other words, in order to use the exemption, ADRs are required to be acquired in a stock exchange authorized by the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance, unless the Internal Revenue Service of Chile applies a different interpretation in the future.
The exercise of preemptive rights relating to the shares is not subject to Chilean taxation. Any gain on the sale or assignment of preemptive rights relating to the shares is subject to both the First Category Tax and the Withholding Tax (the former being creditable against the latter).
Other Chilean taxes. No Chilean inheritance, gift or succession taxes apply to the transfer or disposition of ADS by a foreign holder, but such taxes generally do apply to the transfer or disposition of shares by a foreign holder by bequest, devise or gift. No Chilean stamp, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties apply to foreign holders of ADS or shares.
U.S. federal income tax considerations
The following is a discussion of material U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder described below of owning and disposing of shares or ADS, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular person’s decision to hold such securities. The discussion applies only to a U.S. Holder that holds shares or ADS as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes and it does not describe all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to holders subject to special rules, such as:
- | Certain financial institutions |
- | Dealers or traders in securities who use a mark-to-market method of tax accounting |
- | Persons holding shares or ADS as part of a hedging transaction, straddle, wash sale, conversion transaction or integrated transaction , or persons entering into a constructive sale with respect to the ADS or shares |
- | Persons whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar |
- | Entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes |
- | Persons liable for the alternative minimum tax |
- | Persons liable for tax under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) known as the Medicare contribution tax |
- | Tax-exempt entities, including “individual retirement accounts” or “Roth IRAs” |
- | Persons that own or are deemed to own ten percent or more of our voting stock |
- | Persons who acquired our ADS or shares pursuant to the exercise of any employee stock option or otherwise as compensation |
- | Persons holding shares or ADS in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the United States. |
If an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds shares or ADS, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding shares or ADS and partners in such partnerships should consult their tax advisers as to the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding and disposing of the shares or ADS.
This discussion is based on the Code, administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, all as of the date hereof. These laws are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. It is also based in part on representations of the Depositary and assumes that each obligation under the Deposit Agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms.
A “U.S. Holder” is a holder who, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is a beneficial owner of shares or ADS and is:
- | a citizen or individual or resident of the United States; |
- | a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia; or |
- | an estate or trust, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source. |
In general, a U.S. Holder who owns ADS will be treated as the owner of the underlying shares represented by those ADS for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized if a U.S. Holder exchanges ADS for the underlying shares represented by those ADS.
The U.S. Treasury has expressed concerns that parties to whom American depositary shares are pre-released or intermediaries in the chain of ownership between United States holders and the issuer of the security underlying the American depositary shares may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by United States holders of American depositary shares. Such actions would also be inconsistent with the claiming of the preferential rates of tax, described below, applicable to dividends received by certain non-corporate holders.
Accordingly, the analysis of the creditability of Chilean taxes and the availability of the preferential rates of tax applicable to dividends received by certain non-corporate holders, each described below, could be affected by actions taken by such parties or intermediaries.
U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers concerning the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of owning and disposing of shares or ADS in their particular circumstances.
Taxation of distributions
Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules described below, distributions paid on ADS or shares, other than certain pro rata distributions of shares, will be treated as dividends to the extent paid out of the Company’s current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Because the Company does not maintain calculations of its earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, it is expected that distributions generally will be reported to U.S. Holders as dividends. Subject to applicable limitations and the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the U.S. Treasury, dividends paid by “qualified foreign corporations” to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders may be taxable at the preferential rates applicable to long-term capital gain. A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid on stock that is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, such as the New York Stock Exchange where our ADS are traded. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the availability of these preferential tax rates on dividends in their particular circumstances. The amount of a dividend will include any amounts withheld by the Company in respect of Chilean taxes (taking into account the credit for First Category Taxes, as described in “—Chilean Tax Considerations—Taxation of dividends”). The amount of the dividend will be generally treated as foreign-source dividend income to U.S. Holders and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations under the Code. Dividends will be included in a U.S. Holder’s income on the date of the U.S. Holder’s or, in the case of ADS, the Depositary’s receipt of the dividend. The amount of any dividend income paid in Chilean pesos will be a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date of such receipt regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income. A U.S. Holder may have foreign currency gain or loss if the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars after the date of its receipt.
Subject to applicable limitations that may vary depending upon the U.S. Holder’s circumstances and subject to the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the U.S. Treasury, Chilean income taxes withheld from dividends on shares (after reduction for the credit for First Category Tax) generally will be creditable against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex, and U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the availability of foreign tax credits in their particular circumstances. Instead of claiming a foreign tax credit, a U.S. Holder may, at its election, deduct such Chilean taxes in computing its taxable income, subject to generally applicable limitations under U.S. law.
An election to deduct foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits applies to all taxes paid or accrued in the taxable year to foreign countries and possessions of the United States.
Sale or other disposition of shares or ADS |
Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules described below, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, gain or loss realized on the sale or other disposition of shares or ADS will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder held the shares or ADS for more than one year. The amount of gain or loss will be equal to the difference between the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the shares or ADS disposed of and the amount realized on the disposition, in each case as determined in U.S. dollars. Because such gain or loss will generally be U.S.-source gain or loss for foreign tax credit purposes, the creditability of any Chilean taxes imposed on gain from shares or ADS may be significantly limited. See “—Chilean tax considerations—Capital gains.” U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the creditability of such Chilean taxes.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules |
In general, a non-U.S. corporation will be considered a “passive foreign investment company” (“PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year in which: (i) 75% or more of its gross income consists of passive
income or (ii) 50% or more of the average quarterly value of its assets consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. For purposes of the above calculations, a non-U.S. corporation that directly or indirectly owns at least 25% by value of the shares of another corporation is treated as if it held its proportionate share of the assets of such other corporation and received directly its proportionate share of the income of such other corporation. Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, rents, royalties and capital gains.
The Company does not believe that it should be treated as a “PFIC” for U.S. federal income tax purposes for its 2012 taxable year. However, because PFIC status depends upon the composition of a company’s income and assets and the market value of its assets from time to time, which may be determined in large part by reference to the market value of a company’s stock, and because of uncertainties in the manner of application of the PFIC rules, including uncertainties as to the valuation and proper characterization of certain of the Company’s assets as passive or active, in particular uncertainty as to the characterization of certain reserves denominated as mandatory investments, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be considered a PFIC for any taxable year. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisers to determine whether the Company was a PFIC for its 2012 taxable year and what the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in a PFIC are to them.
If the Company were a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder held shares or ADS, such holder would be subject to special rules generally intended to eliminate any benefits from the deferral of U.S. federal income tax that a U.S. Holder could derive from investing in a foreign corporation that does not distribute all of its earnings on a current basis. Unless a U.S. Holder has made the mark-to-market election described below, upon a disposition of shares or ADS, including, under certain circumstances, a pledge or a disposition pursuant to an otherwise tax-free reorganization, gain recognized by a U.S. Holder would be allocated ratably over the holder’s holding period for the shares or ADS. The amounts allocated to the taxable year of the disposition and to years before the company became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated to each other taxable year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for individuals or corporations, as appropriate, for such taxable year, and an interest charge will be imposed on the resulting tax liability for each such taxable year. Similar rules would apply to any distribution in respect of shares or ADS to the extent it exceeds 125% of the average of the annual distributions on shares or ADS received by a U.S. Holder during the preceding three years or such holder’s holding period, whichever is shorter. If the Company were a PFIC, a U.S. Holder would also be subject to these adverse U.S. federal income tax rules on indirect or constructive distributions on, or dispositions of, shares of any subsidiary of the Company that is a PFIC. If the Company were a PFIC for any year during which a U.S. Holder holds shares or ADS, it would generally continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such holder for all succeeding years during which the U.S. Holder holds shares or ADS even if the Company ceased to meet the threshold requirements for PFIC status.
Alternatively, if the shares or ADS are “regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange,” a U.S. Holder may make a mark-to-market election that would result in tax treatment different from the general tax treatment for PFICs described above. The shares or ADS will be treated as “regularly traded” in any calendar year in which more than a minimum quantity of the shares or ADS, as the case may be, are traded on a qualified exchange on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter. A “qualified exchange” includes a foreign exchange that is regulated by a governmental authority in which the exchange is located and with respect to which certain other requirements are met. The New York Stock Exchange, on which our ADS are listed, is a qualified exchange for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Consequently, if the ADS are regularly traded on the New York Stock Exchange, the mark-to-market election would be available to a U.S. Holder of ADS if the Company is or becomes a PFIC.
If the mark-to-market election is available and a U.S. Holder makes a mark-to-market election, such holder generally will recognize as ordinary income the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares or ADS at the end of each taxable year over their adjusted tax basis, and will recognize an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the adjusted tax basis of the shares or ADS over their fair market value at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the mark-to-market election). If a U.S. Holder makes the election, such holder’s basis in the shares or ADS will be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amounts. Any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of such shares or ADS in a year when the Company is a PFIC will be treated as ordinary income and any loss will be treated as an ordinary loss (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the mark-to-market election).
A timely election to treat the Company as a qualified electing fund under Section 1295 of the Code would result in alternative treatment. U.S. Holders should be aware, however, that the Company does not intend to satisfy record keeping and other requirements that would permit U.S. Holders to make qualified electing fund elections if the Company were a PFIC.
If a U.S. Holder owns shares or ADS during any year in which the Company is a PFIC, such holder generally must file an Internal Revenue Service Form 8621 (or any other form as the U.S. Treasury may require) with respect to the Company, generally with the holder’s federal income tax return for that year.
If the Company were a PFIC or, with respect to a particular U.S. Holder, were treated as a PFIC for the taxable year in which it paid a dividend or for the prior taxable year, the preferential rates discussed above with respect to dividends paid to certain non-corporation U.S. Holders would not apply.
Information reporting and backup withholding
Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries generally are subject to information reporting, and may be subject to backup withholding unless (i) the U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient or (ii) in the case of backup withholding, the U.S. Holder provides a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is not subject to backup withholding.
The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. Holder to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals may be required to report information relating to their ownership of securities of a non-U.S. person, subject to certain exceptions (including an exception for securities held in certain accounts maintained by U.S. financial institutions, such as our ADS). U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the effect, if any, of these rules on their ownership and disposition of shares or ADS.
INVESTORS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISERS ABOUT THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF ADS OR SHARES.
Not applicable.
Not applicable. |
We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act, except that as a foreign issuer, we are not subject to the proxy rules or the short-swing profit and disclosure rules of the Exchange Act. We file or furnish reports and other information to the SEC to the extent required by the statutory requirements applicable to our Company. Reports and other information filed or furnished by us to the SEC may be inspected and copies obtained at the public reference room maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operations of the Public Reference Section by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. Our filings with the SEC are also available through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and can also be inspected and copies obtained at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
Not applicable. |
The Company’s future earnings and financial position are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency, interest rate, mandatory investments and the value of long-term obligations in connection with life and disability insurance. In the ordinary course of business, Provida manages exposure to risk of its trading and investment activities as mentioned below.
Foreign currency exchange rate risk
As a result of its investment in Provida Internacional, Provida is exposed to foreign exchange rate risks. Provida has investments in associated foreign companies, for an estimated value of MUS$72, contributing MCh$9,963 to Provida’s revenues as of December 31, 2012.
The devaluation of the domestic currency against the US dollar and the appreciation of the dollar with respect to the Chilean peso could adversely affect the returns on Provida’s equity interests and as a result affect profits recognized on such investments for the relevant period.
Interest rate risk
To meet its working capital needs, the Company has various lines of credit and it can be exposed to minor interest rate risk as a result. There is no interest rate risk in relation to current leasing obligations given that the interest rates under these agreements are fixed.
Mandatory investments
Provida’s main asset is the mandatory investments and is equivalent to a 1% equity interest in that pension fund. Provida is required to maintain a 1% equity interest in each pension fund it invests in. Mandatory investments in pension funds represent nearly 50% of Provida’s total assets under management and given the volatility of local and foreign markets in which the pension funds’ assets are invested; Provida’s future gains/losses on mandatory investments are subject to uncertainty which in turn make Provida’s future earnings from these investments equally uncertain.
Additionally, mandatory investments are held in order to compensate participants in case pension funds do not comply with the legal minimum returns requirements, which would imply that Provida would lose part of its equity interest, as the AFP must replenish the 1% of its reserve by its own resources to compensate participants. The minimum return requirement is calculated by taking the industry’s average returns of pension funds of the previous of 36 months.
Managing these risks is the responsibility of Provida’s trustee, whose aim is to optimize the returns of each fund for a certain level of risk or minimize the level of risk in order to achieve a target return.
Accordingly, Provida has a risk management policy, which defines the activities and criteria Provida applies to identify, measure, control and manage in an efficient way the risks associated with the fund management. Therefore, Provida manages the equity interest of pension funds under internal limits of credit risk, by analyzing the expected losses and applying measures of market risks. This approach is known as value at risk (“VaR”) and measures the probable impact of adverse conditions in securities prices (fixed income, currencies and variable income) on each Fund Type. Moreover, in order to ensure the reliability of future benefits payment and fulfillment of applicable minimum returns requirements, Provida applies a relative VaR analysis over differing positions between each fund type and to the system’s model portfolio.
Life and disability payment obligations
Life and disability insurance obligations are considered long-term obligations because the benefits to disabled participants are rendered following the final disability determination test, which is three years after the initial disability determination (defined as a decrease between one -half and two -thirds of the working capacity). Until October 2008, the total disability benefits (decrease in more than two thirds in the working capacity) were also granted three years after the initial disability determination. See “Item 4. Information on Provida—B. Business overview—Primary expenses.”
In quantitative terms, an AFP had to replenish any shortfall equivalent to the difference between a participant’s savings in his/her individual capitalization account and the benefits granted to him/her by law. These benefits correspond to the present value of the life annuity pension (equivalent to 70% or 50% of the participant’s average
taxable remuneration for the last ten years depending on total or partial disability determination) discounted by the life annuity rates in force at the time of the payment. As a result, changes in interest rates impact the final value of an AFP’s payment obligations.
One of the main changes introduced by the Pension Reform Law was the elimination of the AFP’s individual obligation to provide life and disability insurance benefits. On July 1, 2009, a group of insurers was awarded the life and disability administration for a 12 month term. Consequently, Provida only maintains those casualties pending payment due to temporary disability as per the insurance contract which is in a runoff stage.
Additionally, insurance regulations governing life and disability insurance policies instructed that casualties reserves should be determined at market interest rate rather than historical rates (defined as the minimum interest rate of the previous semester), giving insurers the alternative of applying such methodology to existing contracts. AFP Provida requested that BBVA Seguros de Vida, adopt such regulation so that Provida’s liabilities would more accurately reflect the amount that will effectively be paid (i.e. fair value). Likewise, by mutual consent of the parties, (previous compensation to the insurer for change in conditions), the financial performance of cash flow surplus was modified with a benchmark determined by assets of similar duration than the insurer’s liability.
In view of changes made in the management of assets and liabilities associated with the life and disability insurance, AFP Provida has mitigated the risk associated with interest rate fluctuation.
Operational risk |
With respect to operational risk, understood as the risk of errors in the execution of the Company’s processes, AFP Provida has control structures designed both to avoid the occurrence of such errors and to mitigate their impact. For this, the Company combines a preventive view and a reactive view of risk management.
Provida’s internal controls (preventive control) seek to identify the weaknesses and risks of processes before they occur by establishing controls to prevent the occurrence of errors or mitigate their impact. Provida’s operational risk control (reactive control) seeks, once a mistake has been made and it has materialized into an operational impact, to establish controls to prevent its recurrence or mitigate its impact.
From this perspective, the major operational risk events of the Company involve "financial compensation" to participants and delays in crediting contributions in participants’ individual accounts. To this end, during the last year, the Company continued to develop mitigation processes for these events by adapting operational processes, redefining processes and systems, increasing bandwidth and data processing.
Not applicable. |
Not applicable. |
Not applicable. |
The depositary for our American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) is the Bank of New York Mellon (“BNYM”). |
Holders of our ADSs are generally expected to pay fees to BNYM according to the schedule below: |
Persons depositing or withdrawing shares must pay: | For: | ||
U.S.$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs) | ■ | Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution, sale or exercise of shares or rights or other property | |
■ | Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal including if the deposit agreement terminates | ||
U.S.$0.02 (or less) per ADS | ■ | Any cash distribution to ADSs registered holders | |
A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs | ■ | Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the depositary to ADS registered holders | |
Registration or transfer fees | ■ | Transfer and registration of shares on the Company’s share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares | |
Expenses of the depositary | ■ | Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the deposit agreement) | |
■ | Converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars | ||
Taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADSs or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes | ■ | As necessary | |
Any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities | ■ | As necessary |
BNYM collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. BNYM also collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. BNYM may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deductions from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. BNYM may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.
The Depositary may remit to us all or a portion of the Depositary fees charged for the reimbursement of certain of the expenses we incur in respect of the ADS program established pursuant to the Deposit Agreement upon such terms and conditions as we may agree from time to time. In the year ended December 31, 2012, the Depositary reimbursed US$46,874.99 with respect to certain fees and expenses. The table below sets forth the types of expenses that the Depositary has agreed to reimburse and the amounts reimbursed in 2012:
Amount Reimbursed in the Year Ended | |
Category of Expenses | December 31, 2012 |
(In US$) | |
NYSE and miscellaneous expenses | 46,874.99 |
There has been no material default in the payment of principal and interest or any other material default in Provida and its subsidiaries’ debt obligations that has not been cured within 30 days.
None. |
Disclosure controls and procedures |
Provida, under the supervision of and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Pension Accounting Division Manager and the Planning & Control Division Manager, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness as of December 31, 2012 of the design and operation of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act). There are, as described below, inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any control system, the main one being that these control systems can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Following the evaluation process, Provida’s Chief Executive Officer, the Pension Accounting Division Manager and the Planning & Control Division Manager concluded that Provida’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2012 in ensuring that information in relation to Provida and its consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported for the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and by the deadlines stipulated, and (2) accumulated and communicated to the management, including the principal financial officers in an appropriate way so to allow decisions regarding required disclosures.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
The management of Provida is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15 (f) of the Exchange Act. Provida’s internal control over financial reporting is a framework designed to provide reasonable assurance, for external purposes, regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and includes policies and procedures that:
- | pertain to the maintenance of records that, accurately and fairly reflect Provida’s transactions and disposals of its assets; |
- | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and that the Company’s expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of Provida’s management and directors; and |
- | provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisitions, use or disposal of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision of and with the participation of Provida’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Pension Accounting Division Manager and the Planning & Control Division Manager, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on an assessment of those criteria, Provida’s management concluded that, as of December 31, 2012, its internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 has been audited by Deloitte, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which follows below.
88
Deloitte Auditores y Consultores Limitada RUT: 80.276.200-3 Rosario Norte 407 Las Condes, Santiago Chile Fono: (56-2) 2729 7000 Fax: (56-2) 2374 9177 e-mail: deloittechile@deloitte.com www.deloitte.cl |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders of
Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida S.A.:
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida S.A. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Deloitte® se refiere a Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited una compañía privada limitada por garantía, de Reino Unido, y a su red de firmas miembro, cada una de las cuales es una entidad legal separada e independiente. Por favor, vea en www.deloitte.cl/acerca de la descripción detallada de la estructura legal de Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited y sus firmas miembro.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited es una compañía privada limitada por garantía constituida en Inglaterra & Gales bajo el número 07271800, y su domicilio registrado: Hill House, 1 Little New Street, London, EC4A 3TR, Reino Unido.
Deloitte Auditores y Consultores Limitada RUT: 80.276.200-3 Rosario Norte 407 Las Condes, Santiago Chile Fono: (56-2) 2729 7000 Fax: (56-2) 2374 9177 e-mail: deloittechile@deloitte.com www.deloitte.cl |
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 of the Company and our report dated April 17, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
/s/ Deloitte
Santiago, Chile
Santiago, Chile
April 17, 2013
Deloitte® se refiere a Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited una compañía privada limitada por garantía, de Reino Unido, y a su red de firmas miembro, cada una de las cuales es una entidad legal separada e independiente. Por favor, vea en www.deloitte.cl/acerca de la descripción detallada de la estructura legal de Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited y sus firmas miembro.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited es una compañía privada limitada por garantía constituida en Inglaterra & Gales bajo el número 07271800, y su domicilio registrado: Hill House, 1 Little New Street, London, EC4A 3TR, Reino Unido.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
There has been no change in Provida’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
For the fiscal year 2012, Provida’s Board of Directors determined that Mr. Jesús del Pino Durán, a member of the Directors’ Committee, met the requirements of an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with SEC rules and regulations. The Board of Directors made this determination based on Mr. del Pino’s understanding of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS); his ability to assess the general application IFRS in connection with the accounting for estimates, provisions and reserves, his experience in analyzing and evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the audited Consolidated Financial Statements, his understanding of internal controls over financial reporting and his understanding of audit committee functions. All three members of the Directors’ Committee have experience in overseeing and assessing the performance of Provida and its consolidated subsidiaries and its external auditors have experience in the preparation, auditing and evaluation of Provida’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The audit committee’s financial expert, here Mr. del Pino, currently satisfies the “independence” standard established in Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.
Provida has adopted a code of ethics that is applicable to all employees of Provida. Such document is called “Código de Conducta del Grupo BBVA” (“BBVA Group Code of Conduct”), and it applies to all officers and employees of all subsidiaries of the BBVA Group worldwide. A copy of the BBVA Group Code of Conduct can be obtained from the BBVA Group’s website, www.bbva.com. A copy will also be provided without charge to any person upon written request to the General Counsel of Provida, located at 100 Pedro de Valdivia Avenue, 15th floor, Santiago, Chile.
Audit Fees |
Amounts paid to the auditors for statutory audit and other services were provided as follows: |
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Audit Fees(1) | 259.5 | 252.8 | 268.0 | |||||||||
Audit Related Fees(2) | 12.6 | - | - | |||||||||
Tax Fees(3) | 4.5 | - | - | |||||||||
All Other Fees(4) | 4.0 | - | - | |||||||||
Total | 280.6 | 252.8 | 268.0 |
(1) | Aggregate fees billed for each of the last three fiscal years for professional services rendered by Deloitte for the audit of Provida’s annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by Deloitte, in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years. |
(2) | Aggregate fees billed in each of the last three fiscal years for assurance and related services by Deloitte that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Provida’s financial statements and are not reported under (1) above. |
(3) | Aggregate fees billed in each of the last three fiscal years for professional services rendered by Deloitte for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. |
(4) | Aggregate fees billed in each of the last three fiscal years for products and services provided by Deloitte other than the services reported in (1), (2) and (3) above. |
None. |
In 2012, neither Provida nor any of its related companies purchased any of Provida’s equity securities. |
Since the date of the Ordinary Shareholders’ meeting held on April 29, 2012, where it was agreed that Provida would continue to retain the services of the external auditing firm, whose reports appear in this Form 20-F, there have been no changes in this area for the fiscal year 2012.
To review the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards, please see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board practices”.
Not applicable. |
Provida has responded to Item 18 in lieu of Item 17. |
Reference is made to Item 19 for a list of Provida’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this annual report.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements:
Page | |
F-1 | |
F-2 | |
F-4 | |
F-6 | |
F-8 | |
F-9 |
Index to Exhibits:
1.1 | English translation of the By-Laws of Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida S.A. (“Provida”) (incorporated by reference to Provida’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2011). |
4.1 | English translation of the Life and Disability Insurance Contract between AFP Provida and BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. and Amendments (incorporated by reference to Provida’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2011). |
4.2 | English translation of the Software Licensing Contract between AFP Provida and BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A. (formerly BBVA Pensiones Chile S.A.) (incorporated by reference to Provida’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 18, 2010). |
4.3 | English translation of the Outsourcing Contract between AFP Provida and BBVA Servicios Corporativos Ltda. (incorporated by reference to Provida’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2011). |
4.3.1 | English translation of the Amendment dated March 30, 2011 to the Outsourcing Contract between AFP Provida and BBVA Servicios Corporativos Ltda. (incorporated by reference to Provida’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2012). |
8.1 | List of Subsidiaries |
12.1 | Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer |
12.2.1 | Section 302 Certification of the Pension Accounting Division Manager |
12.2.2 | Section 302 Certification of the Planning and Control Division Manager |
13.1 | Section 906 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer |
13.2.1 | Section 906 Certification of the Pension Accounting Division Manager |
13.2.2 | Section 906 Certification of the Planning and Control Division Manager |
SIGNATURE
The registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that is has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida S.A. | ||
By: | /s/ Ricardo Rodríguez Marengo | |
Name: | Ricardo Rodríguez Marengo | |
Title: | Chief Executive Officer |
Dated: April 30, 2013
Deloitte Auditores y Consultores Limitada RUT: 80.276.200-3 Rosario Norte 407 Las Condes, Santiago Chile Fono: (56-2) 2729 7000 Fax: (56-2) 2374 9177 e-mail: deloittechile@deloitte.com www.deloitte.cl |
To the Shareholders of
Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida S.A.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, all expressed in millions of Chilean pesos. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (‘‘IASB’’).
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 17, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte
Santiago, Chile
April 17, 2013
Deloitte® se refiere a Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited una compañía privada limitada por garantía, de Reino Unido, y a su red de firmas miembro, cada una de las cuales es una entidad legal separada e independiente. Por favor, vea en www.deloitte.cl/acerca de la descripción detallada de la estructura legal de Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited y sus firmas miembro.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited es una compañía privada limitada por garantía constituida en Inglaterra & Gales bajo el número 07271800, y su domicilio registrado: Hill House, 1 Little New Street, London, EC4A 3TR, Reino Unido.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011
12.31.2012 | 12.31.2011 | |||||||||||
Note | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||
Current Assets | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 5 | 41,245 | 36,091 | |||||||||
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss | 15 | 20,305 | 20,020 | |||||||||
Trade and other receivables | 8 | 8,466 | 7,039 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable from related parties | 11 | 3,411 | 6,208 | |||||||||
Inventories | 9 | 263 | 395 | |||||||||
Prepayments | 10 | 293 | 469 | |||||||||
Current tax assets | 12 | 18,850 | 15,925 | |||||||||
Other current assets | 20 | 32 | 31 | |||||||||
Non-current assets held for sale | 19 | 26,431 | - | |||||||||
Total Current Assets | 119,296 | 86,178 | ||||||||||
Non-Current Assets | ||||||||||||
Mandatory investment | 6 | 217,072 | 201,418 | |||||||||
Trade and other receivables, net | 8 | 519 | 329 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable from related parties | 11 | - | - | |||||||||
Investments accounted for using equity method | 14 | 6,056 | 24,691 | |||||||||
Intangible assets other than goodwill | 17 | 34,949 | 39,838 | |||||||||
Goodwill | 18 | 273 | 8,930 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 16 | 26,383 | 27,787 | |||||||||
Deferred tax assets | 12 | 2,361 | 885 | |||||||||
Prepayments | 10 | - | 216 | |||||||||
Other non-current assets | 20 | 66 | 76 | |||||||||
Total Non-Current Assets | 287,679 | 304,170 | ||||||||||
Total Assets | 406,975 | 390,348 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011
12.31.2012 | 12.31.2011 | |||||||||||
Note | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Liabilities and Equity | ||||||||||||
Current Liabilities | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | 21 | 67 | 63 | |||||||||
Trade and other payables | 22 | 23,650 | 20,457 | |||||||||
Accounts payable to related parties | 11 | 775 | 1,822 | |||||||||
Provisions | 23 | 10,414 | 14,154 | |||||||||
Current tax liabilities | 12 | 21,928 | 19,792 | |||||||||
Other current liabilities | 24 | 52 | 281 | |||||||||
Accrued liabilities | 888 | 548 | ||||||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 57,774 | 57,117 | ||||||||||
Non-Current Liabilities | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | 21 | 299 | 354 | |||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | 12 | 33,416 | 27,270 | |||||||||
Other non-current liabilities | 24 | 813 | 827 | |||||||||
Total Non-Current Liabilities | 34,528 | 28,451 | ||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||
Issued capital | 25 | 104,764 | 104,764 | |||||||||
Other reserves | 25 | (543 | ) | 51 | ||||||||
Retained earnings | 25 | 210,453 | 199,965 | |||||||||
Equity attributable to owners of parent | 314,674 | 304,780 | ||||||||||
Non-controlling interest | - | - | ||||||||||
Total Equity | 314,674 | 304,780 | ||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity | 406,975 | 390,348 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||
Note | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Revenues from Operations | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue | 7 | 163,718 | 153,248 | 147,456 | ||||||||||||
Mandatory investments | 6 | 14,515 | (3,469 | ) | 21,886 | |||||||||||
Total Revenues from Operations | 178,233 | 149,779 | 169,342 | |||||||||||||
Expenses from Operations | ||||||||||||||||
Life and disability insurance premium expense | 13 | 3,718 | 2,326 | (2,338 | ) | |||||||||||
Employee expenses | (32,157 | ) | (30,605 | ) | (30,984 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 16-17 | (8,676 | ) | (8,207 | ) | (8,011 | ) | |||||||||
Impairment losses | 16 | (315 | ) | - | (556 | ) | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous other operating expenses | 28 | (31,934 | ) | (30,665 | ) | (30,008 | ) | |||||||||
Total Expenses from Operations | (69,364 | ) | (67,151 | ) | (71,897 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Operating Income | 108,869 | 82,628 | 97,445 | |||||||||||||
Other Income (Expenses): | ||||||||||||||||
Finance costs | 29 | (30 | ) | (121 | ) | (103 | ) | |||||||||
Financial income (expenses) | 2,916 | 1,553 | 282 | |||||||||||||
Share of profit (loss) of associates accounted for using equity method | 14 | 13,233 | 9,711 | 8,789 | ||||||||||||
Exchange differences | (10 | ) | 122 | 283 | ||||||||||||
Other non-operating income | 31 | 4,901 | 3,050 | 2,564 | ||||||||||||
Other non-operating expenses | 30 | (339 | ) | (376 | ) | (196 | ) | |||||||||
Total Other Income (Expenses) | 20,671 | 13,939 | 11,619 | |||||||||||||
Profit (Loss) before Income Tax | 129,540 | 96,567 | 109,064 | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 12 | (25,506 | ) | (17,712 | ) | (17,440 | ) | |||||||||
Profit (loss) after tax from continuing operations | 104,034 | 78,855 | 91,624 | |||||||||||||
Profit (loss) after tax from discontinuing operations | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
Profit (Loss) | 104,034 | 78,855 | 91,624 | |||||||||||||
Profit (Loss) attributable to owners of parent and non-controlling interests | ||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) attributable to owners of parent | 104,034 | 78,855 | 91,624 | |||||||||||||
Profit (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests | - | - | - | |||||||||||||
Profit (Loss) | 104,034 | 78,855 | 91,624 | |||||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) per Share (in Ch$) Basic and Diluted Earnings Shares: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations | 314.00 | 238.00 | 276.54 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Profit (loss) | 104,034 | 78,855 | 91,624 | |||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income | ||||||||||||
Components of other comprehensive income, before tax: | ||||||||||||
Exchange differences on translation: | ||||||||||||
Gains (losses) on exchange differences on translation, before tax | (529 | ) | 1,373 | (1,635 | ) | |||||||
Reclassification adjustments on exchange differences on translation, before tax | - | - | - | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income, before tax, exchange differences on translation | (529 | ) | 1,373 | (1,635 | ) | |||||||
Other comprehensive income, before tax | (529 | ) | 1,373 | (1,635 | ) | |||||||
Aggregated income tax relating to components of other comprehensive income | - | - | - | |||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income | (529 | ) | 1,373 | (1,635 | ) | |||||||
Total Comprehensive Income | 103,505 | 80,228 | 89,989 | |||||||||
Comprehensive attributable to | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income, attributable to owners of parent | 103,505 | 80,228 | 89,989 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income, attributable to non-controlling interests | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income | 103,505 | 80,228 | 89,989 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued capital | Share premium | Reserve of exchange differences on translation | Other miscellaneous reserves | Other reserves | Retained earnings | Equity attributable to owners of parent | Non- controlling interest | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2012 | 104,610 | 154 | (2,639 | ) | 2,690 | 51 | 199,965 | 304,780 | - | 304,780 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | - | - | 104,034 | 104,034 | - | 104,034 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | - | - | (529 | ) | - | (529 | ) | (529 | ) | - | (529 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | - | - | (529 | ) | - | (529 | ) | 104,034 | 103,505 | - | 103,505 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | - | - | - | - | - | (93,675 | ) | (93,675 | ) | - | (93,675 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes | - | - | - | (65 | ) | (65 | ) | 129 | 64 | - | 64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total changes in equity | - | - | - | (65 | ) | (65 | ) | (93,546 | ) | (93,611 | ) | - | (93,611 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity at end of period 31/12/2012 | 104,610 | 154 | (3,168 | ) | 2,625 | 543 | 210,453 | 314,674 | - | 314,674 |
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued capital | Share premium | Reserve of exchange differences on translation | Other miscellaneous reserves | Other reserves | Retained earnings | Equity attributable to owners of parent | Non- controlling interest | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2011 | 104,610 | 154 | (4,012 | ) | 2,606 | (1,406 | ) | 190,636 | 293,994 | - | 293,994 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | - | - | 78,855 | 78,855 | - | 78,855 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | - | - | 1,373 | - | 1,373 | - | 1,373 | - | 1,373 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | - | - | 1,373 | - | 1,373 | 78,855 | 80,228 | - | 80,228 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | - | - | - | - | - | (69,526 | ) | (69,526 | ) | - | (69,526 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes | - | - | - | 84 | 84 | - | 84 | - | 84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total changes in equity | - | - | - | 84 | 84 | (69,526 | ) | (69,442 | ) | - | (69,442 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity at end of period 31/12/2011 | 104,610 | 154 | (2,639 | ) | 2,690 | 51 | 199,965 | 304,780 | - | 304,780 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued capital | Share premium | Reserve of exchange differences on translation | Other miscellaneous reserves | Other reserves | Retained earnings | Equity attributable to owners of parent | Non- controlling interest | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity at beginning of period 01/01/2010 | 104,610 | 154 | (2,377 | ) | 2,463 | 86 | 164,529 | 269,379 | - | 269,379 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | - | - | 91,624 | 91,624 | - | 91,624 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | - | - | (1,635 | ) | - | (1,635 | ) | - | (1,635 | ) | - | (1,635 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | - | - | (1,635 | ) | - | (1,635 | ) | 91,624 | 89,989 | - | 89,989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | - | - | - | - | - | (66,236 | ) | (66,236 | ) | - | (66,236 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) through transfers and other changes | - | - | - | 143 | 143 | 720 | 863 | - | 863 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total changes in equity | - | - | - | 143 | 143 | 65,516 | 65,373 | - | 65,373 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity at end of period 31/12/2010 | 104,610 | 154 | (4,012 | ) | 2,606 | (1,406 | ) | 190,636 | 293,994 | - | 293,994 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | ||||||||||||
Fee income | 153,602 | 140,543 | 130,788 | |||||||||
Payment to suppliers | (31,605 | ) | (32,689 | ) | (28,933 | ) | ||||||
Premium paid | (310 | ) | (898 | ) | (701 | ) | ||||||
Remunerations paid | (32,352 | ) | (30,499 | ) | (28,043 | ) | ||||||
Dividends received | 8,594 | 7,355 | 4,092 | |||||||||
Interest received | 2,905 | 1,450 | 282 | |||||||||
Income taxes paid | (18,153 | ) | (14,278 | ) | (8,793 | ) | ||||||
Other inflows from operations | 21,939 | 20,912 | 13,386 | |||||||||
Other outflows from operations | (10,655 | ) | (5,950 | ) | (14,352 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flows from (used in) operating activities | 93,965 | 85,947 | 67,726 | |||||||||
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment | 3,247 | 911 | 53 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sales of shares from mandatory investments | 7,410 | 8,809 | 2,264 | |||||||||
Payments for acquiring shares of mandatory investments | (8,549 | ) | (9,170 | ) | (5,775 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (4,381 | ) | (3,670 | ) | (3,290 | ) | ||||||
Loans to related companies | - | - | - | |||||||||
Other cash outflows from investing activities | (1,472 | ) | (14,575 | ) | (2,563 | ) | ||||||
Other cash inflows from investing activities | 5,932 | 1,135 | 838 | |||||||||
Net cash flows from (used in) investing activities | 2,187 | (16,560 | ) | (8,473 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from borrowings | 5,058 | 3,145 | 18,143 | |||||||||
Proceed from borrowings from related companies | 9,551 | 7,400 | 12,473 | |||||||||
Repayments of borrowings | (4,519 | ) | (2,816 | ) | (18,133 | ) | ||||||
Repayments of borrowing from related companies | (9,439 | ) | (8,430 | ) | (13,125 | ) | ||||||
Dividend paid | (91,649 | ) | (69,760 | ) | (61,935 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flows from (used in) financing activities | (90,998 | ) | (70,461 | ) | (62,577 | ) | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents before effect of exchange rate changes | 5,154 | (1,074 | ) | (3,324 | ) | |||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | - | - | - | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 5,154 | (1,074 | ) | (3,324 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 36,091 | 37,165 | 40,489 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | 41,245 | 36,091 | 37,165 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTE 1. CORPORATE INFORMATION
AFP Provida S.A. is a public corporation and legally domiciled at 100 Pedro de Valdivia Avenue, 16th floor, commune of Providencia in Santiago de Chile. The terms “AFP Provida”, “Provida” and “Company”, refer to the Pension Funds Administrator AFP Provida S.A., unless otherwise stated. References to “AFP” or “AFPs” refer to private pension funds administrators in general.
AFP Provida was constituted by public deed granted by Mr. Patricio Zaldivar Mackenna, Notary of Santiago, on March 3, 1981, and authorized to initiate activities by the Superintendency of Pensions, through Resolution
No. E-006/81 of April 1, 1981.
The sole objective of the Company is to administer Provida’s Pension Funds Types A, B, C, D and E, under the terms established in Decree Law 3.500 of 1980 and its amendments, and to provide the services as established therein. From 1994 onward, through Law 19.301, the business of the AFPs was expanded by allowing them to constitute affiliate corporations. Likewise, they were allowed to invest in Corporations constituted as central securities depositories referred to in Law No. 18,876.
On June 13, 1983, AFP Provida was registered in the Securities Registry of the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance (SVS) under number 0211, initiating affiliation activities into the system on May 2, 1981, and collecting contributions from June 1 of the same year.
AFP Provida is a subsidiary of BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A, a Chilean entity controlled by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (Spanish Entity).
Business activities of AFP Provida are regulated by the Superintendency of Pensions.
NOTE 2. GENERAL INFORMATION
a) | Regulation of the Pension System |
Pension Funds Administrators are corporations whose sole and exclusive objective is to administer Pension Funds and grant and administrate their benefits and services as required by law. They are subject to the rules and regulations of Decree Law 3,500 of 1980 and, in supplementary form, the provisions of Law No. 18,046 of 1981, its amendments and regulations.
Law No. 20,255, which became effective on July 1, 2009, introduced amendments to DL No. 3,500 in relation to the Pension Reform, as well as Law No. 20,366, which presents the benefits of the Solidarity Pension system.
The Superintendency of Pensions is the agency that regulates the Pension Funds Administrators and supervise the compliance with laws and regulations governing them, and also the instructions that the Superintendency issues. The Superintendency of Pensions also monitors the operations of the Administrators in their legal, administrative and financial aspects; applying sanctions for non-compliance with legal and regulatory provisions, and ensures that Administrators be in compliance with the minimum capital and mandatory investment requirements.
b) | Economic Activity |
To strengthen its competitive position, Provida, like other large AFPs, merged with smaller AFPs in order to increase its market share and reach economies of scale.
On May 2, 1995, through Resolution No. E-107-95, the Superintendency of Pensions authorized the merger with El Libertador Pensions Fund.
On May 28, 1998, Provida acquired a 99.99% ownership interest of AFP Unión S.A. (“AFP Unión”) from Inversiones Interamericana S.A. Resolution No. E-146-98 authorized it to merge with AFP Provida and their respective pension funds on June 1, 1998.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On March 18, 1998, Corp Group Pensions acquired an 89.1% ownership interest of AFP Protección S.A. (“AFP Protección”); subsequently, on January 1, 1999, Provida acquired AFP Protección’s ownership interest held by Corp Group Pensions and by minority shareholders. Resolution No. E-156-98 authorized the merger of AFP Protección S.A. and AFP Provida and its respective pension funds on January 1, 1999.
These mergers were successful because Provida could sustain the increase in its market share achieved through these acquisitions. In figures, this is reflected by the growth of its market share in terms of participants from 29% before the mergers up to 37% and from 20% up to 28% in terms of funds under management in 2012. AFP Provida continues leading the pension funds industry with funds under management of MUS$46,133 and a portfolio of 3.42 million participants, equivalent to a 28.5% and 36.9% of the market shares, respectively to December 31, 2012.
In addition, starting in 1993, Provida began to participate in private pension funds systems in other Latin American countries. As of December 31, 2012, the Company held ownership interests in AFP Horizonte (Peru), AFP Génesis (Ecuador) and Afore Bancomer (Mexico) through its wholly-owned subsidiary Provida Internacional.
On November 2, 2012, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (“BBVA Spain”), the ultimate controlling party of Provida, sent a letter to Provida Internacional, in which a request was made to evaluate the potential sale of its equity method investments held in AFP Horizonte in Peru and AFORE Bancomer in Mexico, a situation that was analyzed in the Extraordinary Board of Directors’ meeting of Provida Internacional held on November 6, 2012.
In the Extraordinary Board of Directors’ (“Board”) meeting of Provida held on November 27, 2012, and with the objective in mind of analyzing the proposal made by BBVA Spain, the Board of Directors concluded that AFP Horizonte in Peru and Afore Bancomer in Mexico should be put up for sale. Additionally, such sale transaction should be made under market conditions reasonable for Provida Internacional. In the same meeting, BBVA Spain informed the Board that an agreement had been reached to sell BBVA’s stake in Afore Bancomer to Afore XXI Banorte, S.A. de C.V., and invited Provida Internacional to evaluate the sale of its stake, as well which evaluation and ratification was then made, also on November 27, 2012.
On November 27, 2012, the Extraordinary Shareholder’s meeting of Provida Internacional SA, a direct subsidiary of AFP Provida approved the sale of its shares in the associate, Administradora de Fondos para el Retiro Bancomer S.A. de C.V. (México) and put for sale the shares held in AFP Horizonte (Peru), therefore they were classified as held for sale. Subsequently, on January 23, 2013, the Shareholder’s meeting of Provida Internacional approved the sale of the shares held in AFP Horizonte (Peru).
Locally, AFP Provida is an important shareholder of the Centralized Securities Depository (“DCV”) and of PreviRed.com, an entity that offers online services for collection of pension fund contributions. Furthermore, in January 2002, after being granted the administration of the Unemployment Insurance on behalf of a consortium comprised of all AFPs, a new company known as the Administradora de Fondos de Cesantia de Chile S.A. (“AFC”) was created that started operations on October 1, 2002, and in which AFP Provida holds a 37.8% ownership interest.
The law requires that all AFPs have one single social objective and are authorized to provide the following services:
Collect and administrate contributions made by participants - The collection and administration service that AFPs provide refers to both mandatory and voluntary contributions made by participants.
Invest contributions of participants in pension funds administrated by the AFP - In terms of the general objective of its investing activities, Provida administrates the investment portfolios composed of participants contributions, seeking the higher possible returns based on the risk level and terms for the profile of these participants. For this purpose and according to prevailing regulations, participants can choose from five types of funds that allow them to maximize their expected pension in accordance with their specific risk profile. The types of funds differentiate themselves, as stipulated by law, by the percentage invested in variable income securities. Hence, the funds are classified from Fund Type A, with the highest level of variable income securities, to Fund Type E, which includes a maximum 5% invested in variable income. Regulation establishes a series of restrictions on the investing activities that may be carried out in each fund in order to ensure that this differentiation is maintained among the funds according to the variable income risk permitted in each one.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Manage life and disability benefits for participants - Until June 2009, Provida contracted insurance to cover its obligation to provide life and disability benefits for its participants. The selection of the insurance company was performed through a competitive public bidding process open to all companies with life insurance license in Chile and it was designed to deliver the requested coverage under the best terms possible.
In May 2009, the first bidding process for life and disability insurance was carried out, for a 12-month coverage period beginning on July 1, 2009. The cost of the insurance under this new format was a 1.87% of the contributable salaries of participants in the AFPs. Therefore, since Provida no longer provided coverage of this insurance, the Company reduced the fees charged to its participants from 2.64% to 1.54% over contributable salaries beginning July 2009.
In May 2010, the second bidding process for life and disability insurance was held by the AFPs for the period July 2010-June 2012. The rate was reduced to 1.49% of the contributable salaries.
In May 2012, the third bidding process for life and disability insurance was held, effective on July 1, 2012 also for a 24-month coverage period (July 2012-June 2014). The new premium is 1.26% of the contributable salaries.
It is important to mention that in the case of dependent workers, the contribution to finance the insurance (additional contribution) is paid by the employer, except for dependent young workers (between 18 and 35 years) who receive pension subsidies. This obligation became effective on July 1, 2009, and a temporary grace period for workers with fewer than 100 employees ended in June 2011.
Provide an old age pension for participants - The service of providing old age pensions stipulates that each AFP must furnish the specific benefits of old age pensions to its participants who meet the legal retirement age requirement of 60 years for women and 65 years for men.
Finally, the last change introduced by the Pension Reform in 2010 refers to the bidding process of all new participants entering to the private pension system over a 24-month period. This change was adopted to motivate price competition so as to obtain lower commissions for the participant; to generate greater price sensitivity to the demand; to ease the entry of new entities into the AFP industry; and to safeguard the participants’ pensions.
This bid is awarded to the AFP offering the lowest fee commission rate (lower than to those prevailing at the time of the bid) for a 24-month period, over which such AFP may not modify its commissions and apply them to its current portfolio.
In January 2010, the first bidding process was carried out for the administration of pension accounts of new participants entering the system over the next 24-months. The administrators competing in this process were: AFP Cuprum S.A., AFP Habitat S.A., AFP Planvital S.A. and AFP Modelo S.A. On February 1, 2010, it was informed that AFP Modelo had been awarded the bid since it presented an offer with the lowest fee commission of 1.14%.
In January 2012 the second bidding process was carried out for the administration of pension accounts of new participants for the next 24 months. This time, the administrators competing in such process were: AFP Regional S.A. (legally incorporated, but it has not started operations yet), AFP Planvital S.A. and AFP Modelo. On January 30, 2012 it was informed that AFP Modelo had presented the lowest fee commission of 0,77%, thus it had again been awarded the administration of pension accounts. As such, starting August 1, 2012, new participants are affiliated to AFP Modelo over the next 24-months.
Provida believes it has the competitive advantages to successfully face the new conditions of the industry. In addition, Provida has implemented all of the processes and developments conducive to fully comply with the amendments of the Pension Reform Law and is continuously training its employees in order to provide the best service to its customers.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3. | APPLICATION OF NEW AND REVISED INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (IFRS) |
a) | New and revised IFRS effective in the current year |
Amendments to Standards | Effective date |
IAS 12, Income Taxes– Deferred tax: Recovery of underlying assets | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2012. |
IFRS 1 (Revised), First Time Adoption of IFRS – (i)Replacement of ‘fixed dates’ for first-time adopters – (ii) Severe Hyperinflation | Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011. |
IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures –Disclosures - Transfers of financial assets | Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011. |
Amendments to IAS 12, Income Taxes
On December 20, 2010, the IASB published Deferred Tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets – Amendments to IAS 12. The amendments provide an exception to the general principle in IAS 12 Income Taxes (IAS 12) that the measurement of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities should reflect the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the entity expects to recover the carrying amount of an asset.
Specifically, the amendments provide an exception to the principle when deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities arise from investment property measured using the fair value model in IAS 40 Investment Property (IAS 40) and for investment property acquired in a business combination if it is subsequently measured using the fair value model in IAS 40. For the purposes of measuring deferred tax, the amendments introduce a rebuttable presumption that the carrying amount of such an asset will be recovered entirely through sale. The presumption can be rebutted if the investment property is depreciable and is held within a business model whose objective is to consume substantially all of the economic benefits over time, rather than through sale. The amendments to IAS 12 should be applied retrospectively requiring a retrospective restatement of all deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities within the scope of the amendment, including those that were initially recognized in a business combination. The effective date of the amendments is for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2012. Earlier application is permitted.
Management estimates that these amendments have not had any impact in the accounting policies during the period.
Amendments to IFRS 1, First Time Adoption of IFRS
On December 20, 2010, the IASB published certain amendments IFRS 1 First Time Adoption of IFRS, specifically:
• | Removal of Fixed Dates for First-Time Adopters – These amendments provide relief to first-time adopters of IFRSs by replacing the date of prospective application of the derecognition of financial assets and liabilities of ‘January 1, 2004’ with ‘the date of transition to IFRSs’ so that first-time adopters of IFRS do not have to apply the derecognition requirements in IAS 39 retrospectively from an earlier date; and relieves first-time adopters from recalculating ‘day 1’ gains and losses on transactions occurring before the date of transition to IFRS. |
• | Severe Hyperinflation – These amendments provide guidance for entities emerging from severe hyperinflation either to resume presenting IFRS financial statements or to present IFRS financial statements for the first time. In accordance with the amendment, when an entity’s date of transition to IFRS is on or after the functional currency normalization date, the entity may elect to measure all assets and liabilities held before the functional currency normalization date at fair value on the date of transition to IFRS and use that fair value as the deemed cost of those assets and liabilities in the opening IFRS statement of financial position. Entities making use of this exemption should describe the circumstances of how, and why, their functional currency became subject to severe hyperinflation and the circumstances that led to those conditions ceasing. |
These amendments require mandatory application for annual periods starting on or after July 1, 2011, with early adoption permitted.
Management believes that these amendments do not have any impact on its financial statements as the Company prepares in financial statements under IFRS.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Amendments to IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosure
On October 7, 2010, the IASB issued Disclosures – Transfers of Financial Assets (Amendments to IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosure) that increase the disclosure requirements for transactions involving transfers of financial assets. These amendments are intended to provide greater transparency around risk exposures of transactions where a financial asset is transferred but the transferor retains some level of continuing exposure (referred to as ‘continuing involvement’) in the asset. The amendments also require disclosure where transfers of financial assets are not evenly distributed throughout the period (e.g., where transfers occur near the end of a reporting period). The amendments are applicable for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Disclosures are not required for comparative periods before the date of initial application of the amendments.
Management believes that the application of these amendments has not had any material impact on the accounting policies for the period.
b) | New and revised IFRS in issue but not yet effective |
New Standards, Interpretations and Amendments | Effective date |
IFRS 9, Financial Instruments | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015 |
IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 |
IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 |
IFRS 12, Disclosure of Involvement in Other Entities | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 |
IAS 27 (2011), Separate Financial Statements | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 |
IAS 28 (2011), Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 |
IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurements | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 |
Amendments to Standards | Effective date: |
IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements – Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income | Annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012 |
IAS 19, Employee benefits (2011) | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 |
IAS 32, Financial instruments: presentation – Clarified requirements for offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014 |
IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities. | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. |
IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements and IFRS 12 Disclosure of Involvement with Other Entities – Transition Guidance | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 |
Investment Entities (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27) | Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IFRS 9, Financial Instruments
On November 12, 2009, the IASB issued IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (IFRS 9). This Standard introduces new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets and is effective from 1 January 2013 with early adoption permitted. IFRS 9 specifies how an entity shall classify and measure its financial assets. This Standard requires that all financial assets be classified on the basis of an entity's business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset. Financial assets are either measured at amortized cost or at fair value. Only those financial assets measured at amortized cost are tested for impairment. Additionally, on 28 October 2010, the IASB published a revised version of IFRS 9. The revised standard retains the requirements for classification and measurement of financial assets that were published in November 2009 but adds guidance on the classification and measurement of financial liabilities. As part of its restructuring of IFRS 9, the IASB also copied the guidance on derecognition of financial instruments and related implementation guidance from IAS 39 to IFRS 9. This new guidance concludes the first part of Phase 1 of the Board's project to replace IAS 39. The other phases, impairment and hedge accounting, are not yet completed.
The guidance included in IFRS 9 on the classification and measurement of financial liabilities is unchanged from the classification criteria for financial liabilities currently contained in IAS 39. In other words, financial liabilities will continue to be measured either wholly, or in part, at amortized cost or at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL). The concept of bifurcating embedded derivatives from a financial liability host contract also remains unchanged. Financial liabilities held for trading would continue to be measured at FVTPL, and all other financial liabilities would be measured at amortized cost unless the fair value option is applied, using the existing criteria in IAS 39.
However, there are two differences compared to IAS 39:
- | The presentation of the effects of changes in fair value attributable to a liability’s credit risk; and |
- | The elimination of the cost exemption for derivative liabilities to be settled by delivery of unquoted equity |
On December 16, 2011, the IASB issued Mandatory Effective Date of IFRS 9 and Transition Disclosures, deferring the mandatory effective date of both the 2009 and 2010 versions to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015. Prior to the amendments, application of IFRS 9 was mandatory for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The amendments modify the requirements for transition from IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement to IFRS 9. In addition, the amendments also modify IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures to add certain requirements in the reporting period containing the date of initial application of IFRS 9.
The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015, with early adoption permitted Management has not had the opportunity to consider the potential impact of the adoption of these amendments.
Management believes that this new standard will be adopted in its financial statements for the period beginning January 1, 2015. Further, Management has not had the opportunity to consider the potential impact of the adoption of these amendments.
IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements
On May 12, 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, which is a replacement of IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements and SIC – 12 Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities. The objective of IFRS 10 is to have a single basis for consolidation for all entities, regardless of the nature of the investee, and that basis is control. The definition of control includes three elements: power over an investee, exposure or rights to variable returns of the investee and the ability to use power over the investee to affect the investor’s returns. IFRS 10 provides detailed guidance on how to apply the control principle in a number of situations, including agency relationships and holdings of potential voting rights. An investor would reassess whether it controls an investee if there is a change in facts and circumstances. IFRS 10 replaces those parts of IAS 27 that address when and how an investor should prepare consolidated financial statements and replaces SIC – 12 in its entirety. The effective date of IFRS 10 is January 1, 2013, with earlier application permitted under certain circumstances.
Management believes that this new standard will be adopted in its financial statements for the period beginning January 1, 2013. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements
On May 12, 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements which supersedes IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures and SIC – 13 Jointly Controlled Entities – Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers. IFRS 11 classifies joint arrangements as either joint operations (combining the existing concepts of jointly controlled assets and jointly controlled operations) or joint ventures (equivalent to the existing concept of a jointly controlled entity). A joint operation is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities. A joint venture is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement. IFRS 11 requires the use of the equity method of accounting for interests in joint ventures thereby eliminating the proportionate consolidation method. The effective date of IFRS 11 is January 1, 2013, with earlier application permitted under certain circumstance.
Management believes that this new standard will be adopted in its financial statements for the period beginning January 1, 2013. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
IFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
On May 12, 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities which requires extensive disclosures relating to an entity’s interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and unconsolidated structured entities. IFRS 12 establishes disclosure objectives and specifies minimum disclosures that an entity must provide to meet those objectives. An entity should disclose information that helps users of its financial statements evaluate the nature and risks associated with interests in other entities and the effects of those interests on its financial statements. The disclosure requirements are extensive and significant effort may be required to accumulate the necessary information. The effective date of IFRS 12 is January 1, 2013 but entities are permitted to incorporate any of the new disclosures into their financial statements before that date.
Management believes that this new standard will be adopted in its financial statements for the period beginning January 1, 2013. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
IAS 27 (2011), Separate Financial Statements
IAS 27 (2008) Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements has been amended for the issuance of IFRS 10 but retains the current guidance for separate financial statements.
Management believes that this new standard will be adopted in its financial statements for the period beginning January 1, 2013. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
IAS 28 (2011), Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures
IAS 28 Investments in Associates has been amended for conforming changes based on the issuance of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11.
Management believes that this new standard will be adopted in its financial statements for the period beginning January 1, 2013. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement
On May 12, 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement, which establishes a single source of guidance for fair value measurement under IFRS. The Standard applies to both financial and non-financial items measured at fair value. Fair value is defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date” (i.e., an exit price). IFRS 13 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with early adoption permitted, and applies prospectively from the beginning of the annual period in which the Standard is adopted.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management believes that this new standard will be adopted in its financial statements for the period beginning January 1, 2013. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
Amendments to IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements
On June 16, 2011, the IASB issued Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income (amendments to IAS 1). The amendments retain the option to present profit or loss and other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. Items of other comprehensive income are required to be grouped into those that will and will not subsequently be reclassified to profit or loss. Tax on items of other comprehensive income is required to be allocated on the same basis. The measurement and recognition of items of profit or loss and other comprehensive income are not affected by the amendments, which are applicable for reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012 with earlier application permitted.
Management believes that these amendments will be adopted in its financial statements for the period beginning January 1, 2013. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
Amendment to IAS 19, Employee Benefits
On June 16, 2011, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 19 Employee Benefits (2011) that change the accounting for defined benefit plans and termination benefits. The amendments require the recognition of changes in the defined benefit obligation and in plan assets when those changes occur, eliminating the corridor approach and accelerating the recognition of past service costs. Changes in the defined benefit obligation and plan assets are disaggregated into three components: service costs, net interest on the net defined benefit liabilities (assets) and remeasurements of the net defined benefit liabilities (assets). Net interest is calculated using high quality corporate bond yield. This may be lower than the rate used to calculate the expected return on plan assets, resulting in a decrease in net income. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with earlier application permitted. Retrospective application is required with certain exceptions.
Management believes that these amendments will be adopted in its financial statements for the period beginning January 1, 2013. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
Amendment to IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation
In December 2011, the IASB amended the accounting requirements and disclosures related to offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities by issuing amendments to IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures. These amendments are the result of the IASB and US Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘FASB’ undertaking a joint project to address the differences in their respective accounting standards regarding offsetting of financial instruments. The new disclosures are required for annual and interim periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and the clarifying amendments to IAS 32 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. Both require retrospective application for comparative periods.
Management believes that these amendments will be adopted in its financial statements for the periods beginning January 1, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
Amendment to IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures was amended to require information about all recognized financial instruments that are set off in accordance with paragraph 42 of IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation. The amendments also require disclosure of information about recognized financial instruments subject to enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements even if they are not set off under IAS 32. The IASB believes that these disclosures will allow financial statement users to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements, including rights of set-off associated with an entity's recognized financial assets and recognized financial liabilities, on the entity's financial position. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Early application is permitted.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management believes that these amendments will be adopted in its financial statements for the periods beginning January 1, 2013. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
Amendments to IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements; IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements and IFRS 12, Disclosure of Involvement in Other Entities – Transition Guidance
On June 28, 2012, the IASB published Consolidated Financial Statements, Joint Arrangements and Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 11, and IFRS 12). The amendments are intended to provide additional transition relief in IFRS 10, IFRS 11 and IFRS 12 by limiting the requirement to provide adjusted comparative information to only the preceding comparative period. Also, amendments to IFRS 11 and IFRS 12 eliminate the requirement to provide comparative information for periods prior to the immediately preceding period. The effective date of these amendments is for periods. The effective date of these amendments, annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, is aligned with the effective dates of IFRS 10, IFRS 11 and IFRS 12.
Management believes that these amendments will be adopted in its financial statements for the periods beginning January 1, 2013. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
Investment Entities – Amendments to IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements; IFRS 12, Disclosures of Involvement in Other Entities and IAS 27, Separate Financial Statements
On October 31, 2012, the IASB published “Investment Entities (amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27)”, providing an exemption from consolidation of subsidiaries under IFRS 10 'Consolidated Financial Statements' for entities which meet the definition of an 'investment entity', such as certain investment funds. Instead, such entities would measure their investment in particular subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments' or IAS 39 'Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement'.
The amendments also require additional disclosure about why the entity is considered an investment entity, details of the entity's unconsolidated subsidiaries, and the nature of relationship and certain transactions between the investment entity and its subsidiaries. In addition, the amendments require an investment entity to account for its investment in a relevant subsidiary in the same way in its consolidated and separate financial statements (or to only provide separate financial statements if all subsidiaries are unconsolidated).The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014, with early application permitted.
Management believes that these amendments will be adopted in its financial statements for the periods beginning January 1, 2014. Further, Management believes that the adoption of these changes could have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A., in the period of initial application, thus, it is under review.
NOTE 4. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
a. | Statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) |
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012, have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (hereinafter “IASB”).
The consolidated financial statements of AFP Provida S.A for fiscal year 2012 were approved by the Board of Directors at meeting held on February 27, 2013, subsequently the consolidated financial statements will be submitted to a General Shareholders’ meeting that will take place on April 30, 2013, to be approved.
Figures in the financial statements are expressed in millions of Chilean pesos (MCh$) rounded up. In case of negative figures, they are reported with the minus sign (-).
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
b. | Basis of consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Provida and its subsidiaries. The subsidiaries’ financial statements have been prepared as of the same date as those of Provida, and using uniform accounting policies. When necessary, adjustments are made to eliminate any difference between accounting policies that may exist.
All balances and transactions between the subsidiaries and Provida have been eliminated in consolidation. In case of balances and transactions between associated companies and Provida, these are eliminated to the extent of Provida’s direct or indirect interest in these companies.
b.1. Consolidation principles
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the effective date on which Provida takes control of the company and their consolidation ceases from the date when Provida loses control. In case control is lost over a subsidiary, the consolidated financial statements will include the results of the part of that year in which Provida had control over it.
b.2. Subsidiaries
"Subsidiaries" are companies over which Provida has the ability to exercise control. This capacity is generally, but not only, expressed by the direct or indirect ownership of at least 50% of the voting power of these entities, or even if this ownership percentage is lower or null where the control is provided to Provida by an agreement with shareholders of those entities. Control is achieved where Provida has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.
Non-controlling interests in the equity and comprehensive income of subsidiaries are identified separately from the Provida’s equity and are presented in the line item “equity attributable to non-controlling interests” within the statement of financial position and in the line item “gain (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, respectively.
The following table sets forth the subsidiaries incorporated in the consolidated financial statements of Provida as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:
Ownership interest % | |||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Country | 12.31.2012 | 12.31.2011 | 12.31.2010 | |||||||||
Provida Internacional S.A. | Chile | 99.99 | % | 99.99 | % | 99.99 | % | ||||||
AFP Génesis Ecuador | Ecuador | 99.99 | % | 99.99 | % | 99.99 | % |
b.3. Associates
An associate is an entity over which Provida has, directly or indirectly, significant influence and that is neither a subsidiary nor an interest in a joint venture. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but is not control or joint control over those policies. As a general rule, it is presumed that significant influence is exercised in entities, in which Provida holds either directly or indirectly, 20% to 50% of the ownership interest.Under the equity method, and investment in an associate is initially recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position at cost and adjusted thereafter to recognize the Provida share of the profit or loss and other comprehensive income of the associate.
The following table sets for the associates incorporated in the consolidated financial statements of Provida as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:
Ownership interest % | |||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Country | 12.31.2012 | 12.31.2011 | 12.31.2010 | |||||||||
Soc.Adm. de Fondos de Cesantia de Chile S.A. | Chile | 37.80 | % | 37.80 | % | 37.80 | % | ||||||
Inversiones DCV S.A. | Chile | 23.14 | % | 23.14 | % | 23.14 | % | ||||||
Servicio de Adm- Previsional S.A. | Chile | 37.87 | % | 37.87 | % | 37.87 | % | ||||||
AFORE Bancomer (*) | Mexico | 7.50 | % | 7.50 | % | 7.50 | % | ||||||
AFP Horizonte (*) | Peru | 15.87 | % | 15.87 | % | 15.87 | % |
(*) Significant influence is exercised indirectly through entities of the BBVA Group. See more information in Note 14.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
b.4. Translation of financial statements of foreign operations
Translation of financial statements of subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the Chilean peso has been made as follows:
- | Assets and liabilities are translated at closing exchange rate between the local currency and the Chilean peso. |
- | Income and expense items of the foreign operations are translated at the average exchange rate between the corresponding local currency of each foreign operation and the Chilean peso. |
- | Equity accounts, except for net income for the year, must be translated at the historical exchange rates between the corresponding local currency of each foreign operation and the Chilean peso. |
All translation differences resulting from this process are classified and accumulated as a separate component in Equity denominated “Reserves of exchange differences on translation”.
c. | Key assumptions for estimating uncertainties |
The information contained in these consolidated financial statements is the responsibility of the Company’s Board of Directors which expressly states that each and every principle and criterion included in the IFRS has been fully applied.
On preparing the consolidated financial statements, specific estimates made by the Company’s management were used to measure certain assets, liabilities, income, expenses.
These estimates basically refer to:
- | Measurement of tangible and intangible assets, including Goodwill, to determine any losses resulting from their impairment. |
- | Useful lives of properties, plants and equipment and intangibles. |
- | Information available to determine the fair value of financial instruments. |
- | Probability of occurrence and estimate of uncertain amount of liabilities or contingent liabilities. |
- | Taxable income of the companies included in the consolidated financial statement, to be declared before the respective tax authorities in the future, that have served as a base to record different balances related to income tax in these consolidated financial statements. |
Although these estimates were made according to the best information available at the time of these consolidated financial statements on the facts analyzed, it is possible that events which may occur in the future may obligate the Company to modify them (increase or decrease) in future periods. This would be made prospectively, recognizing the effects of the change in estimates in the corresponding subsequent consolidated financial statements.
d. | Functional currency and presentation currency |
Items included in the financial statement of each of Provida´s entities are measured using the currency of the primary of the economic environment in which the entity operates (“the functional currency”). The Company has defined that its functional currency is the Chilean peso. In order to determine the functional currency, the requirements of IAS 21, The Effects of the Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, were applied and where both primary factors (revenues and expenses) and secondary factors (financing and currency of collection from operational activities). The presentation currency of the consolidated financial statements is the Chilean peso.
e. | Foreign currency transactions |
Transactions that each individual group entity makes in a currency other than its functional currency are recognized at the rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Exchange differences that may arise during the year when retranslating the transactions from the exchange rate prevailing at the dates of the transactions and the exchange rate prevailing at the time of collection or payment are recorded as exchange differences in the statement of comprehensive income.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
f. | Cash and cash equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include the balances held in mutual funds and in banks, sight deposits and short-term highly liquid investments, with an insignificant risk of changing values and original maturity of no more than three months from their date of acquisition.
The direct method was used to prepare the consolidated cash flow statement.
The following expressions are used in the consolidated cash flow statements:
- | Cash flows are inflows or outflows of cash and cash equivalents. |
- | Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. |
- | Operating activities are the principal revenue-producing activities of Pension Funds Administrators and other activities that are not investing or financing activities. |
- | Investing activities are the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and other investments not included in cash equivalents. |
- | Financing activities are activities that result in changes in the size and composition of the contributed equity and borrowings of the entity. |
g. | Financial Assets |
Financial assets held by Provida are classified into the following categories: financial assets ‘at fair value through profit and loss’ (FVTPL)”, ‘loans and receivables’, ‘held-to-maturity’ investments and ‘available-for-sale’ (AFS) financial assets. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined on initial recognition. All regular purchases or sales of financial assets are recognized and derecognized on a trade date basis.
g.1. Effective interest method for those financial assets subsequently measured at amortized cost
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial asset and of allocating interest income over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts (including all fees and points paid or received that form an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts) through the expected life of the financial asset, or, where appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying amount on initial recognition.
g.2. Financial assets at FVTPL
Financial assets are classified as FVTPL when the financial asset is either held for trading or it is designated as at FVTPL. A financial asset is held for trading if it has been acquired principally for the purpose of selling it in the near term. A financial asset other than those held for trading are designated as at FVTPL upon initial recognition if the financial asset forms part of a group of financial assets or financial liabilities or both, which is managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with Provida’s documented risk management policies or investment strategy, information the mandatory investments is provided internally on that basis.
Financial assets at FVTPL are stated at fair value, with any gains and losses arising on remeasurement recognized in profit or loss.
g.3. Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Loans and receivable are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, less
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
any impairment. Interest income is recognized by applying the effective interest rate, except for short-term receivables when the effect of discounting is immaterial.
g.4. Held-to-maturity investments
Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity dates that Provida has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity. Subsequent to initial recognition, held-to-maturity investments are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method less any impairment.
g.5. Available-for-sale financial assets (‘AFS’)
AFS financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are either specifically designated as available-for-sale or are not classified as loans and accounts receivable, held-to-maturity, investments or financial assets at fair value through profit and loss.
AFS financial assets are initially measured at fair value. Transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of financial assets are added to the fair value on initial recognition.
Provida does not have any held-to-maturity investments or financial assets available-for-sale as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
The Company has classified as loans and receivables “Trade and other receivables”. Trade and other receivables are assessed for indicators of impairment at the end of each reporting period. Trade and other receivables are considered to be impaired when there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the loans and receivables, the estimated future cash flows of the asset have been affected. Objective evidence of impairment for trade and other receivables could include Provida’s past experience of collecting payments, an increase in the number of delayed payments past the average credit period of 60 days. The carrying amount of trade and other receivables is reduced by an impairment loss through the use of an allowance account. When trade and other receivables are considered uncollectible, they are written off against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized in profit or loss. For all periods presented there are no objective evidence of impairment in trade and other receivables.
g.6. Derecognition of financial assets
Provida derecognizes a financial asset only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or when it transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to another entity. If Provida neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and continues to control the transferred asset, it recognizes its retained interest in the asset and an associated liability for amounts it may have to pay. If it retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a transferred financial asset, it continues to recognize the financial asset and also recognizes a collateralized borrowing for the proceeds received.
On derecognition of a financial asset, the difference between the asset's carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received is recognized in profit or loss.
g.7. Mandatory investments
The principal financial investment of Provida are mandatory investments which aims to guarantee the minimum return required by law equal to 1% of investment in shares of each pension funds under administration. The mandatory investment requirement is calculated in accordance with instructions issued by the Superintendency of Pensions. Mandatory investments represent approximately 50% of total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
As established in D.L. 3500, the mandatory investment’s purpose is to provide an actual minimum rate of return over the investment portfolios for each one of the pension funds. This minimum rate of return is based on the weighted average real rate of return of all pension funds of the AFP system, over a 36-month period. This requirement has been
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
determined in accordance with the different portfolio compositions, requiring those with a greater investment in variable income securities and therefore potentially subject to higher volatility (Funds Type A and B), a larger margin to achieve the requirement. If for a certain month the rate of return of a pension fund was lower than the minimum rate of return requirement, the AFP is required to cover the difference within five days of such determination by the Superintendency of Pensions. If mandatory investments are used to fund any deficit in the required level of return, the AFP must replenish them within fifteen days. If a deficit is not covered or if mandatory investments are not replenished, the AFP will be liquidated by the Superintendency of Pensions.
Although gains and losses on mandatory investments have certain risks to the stability of the Company’s results in view of the evolution of the returns obtained by different portfolio compositions in the pension funds, the greatest risk associated with mandatory investments is non-compliance with the minimum rate of return requirement. Provida’s risk management policies for mandatory investment are described herein below.
Provida’s management has designated mandatory investments as financial assets at fair value through profit and loss as those financial assets are managed and performance is evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with the Company’s documented investment management policy, and information about the mandatory investments is provided internally on that basis.
h. | Inventories |
Inventories held by Provida are comprised of office supplies and forms.
The inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the normal course of business less all estimated costs of completion and costs necessary to make the sale. The amount resulting from any adjustment of measuring inventories such as damages, or obsolescence, up to its realizable value, as well as losses for other concepts, will be recognized as expenses in the period in which the loss occurs. Any subsequent recovery in its net realizable value will be as a reduction in the amount of inventories recognized as an expense in the period in which the reversal occurs.
The carrying amount of inventories will be derecognized from the statement of financial position and recorded as an expense in the period when consumption of any inventory occurs.
i. | Intangible Assets |
i.1. Goodwill
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the sum of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree, and the fair value of the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree (if any) over the net of the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at fair value. Goodwill arising on acquisition of a business is carried at cost as established at the date of acquisition of the business less accumulated impairment losses, if any.
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to a cash-generating unit that is expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. A cash-generating unit to which goodwill has been allocated is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently when there is indication that the unit may be impaired. The recoverable amount of a cash-generating unit is equal to the higher value between the fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. Value in use is calculated as the discounted value of the cash flow projections and is based on the most recent budgets approved for the next ten years. Any impairment loss for goodwill is recognized directly in profit or loss in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
On disposal of the relevant cash-generating unit, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in the determination of the profit or loss on disposal.
i.2. Software licenses
Software licenses acquired are carried at costs (including expenditures incurred to acquire and prepare them for their specific use) less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Amortization is recognized on a
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The estimated useful life of IT applications is five years. The estimated useful life and amortization method are reviewed at the end of each reporting period, with effect of any changes in estimate being accounted for on a prospective basis.
i.3. Intangible assets acquired in a business combination
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination and recognized separately from goodwill are initially recognized at their fair value at the acquisition date (which is regarded as their cost). Subsequent to initial recognition, intangible assets acquired in a business combination are reported at cost less cumulated amortization and accumulated impairment loss.
The estimated useful life of the intangible asset related to customer list is twenty years and is amortized on a straight-line basis.
j. | Property, plant and equipment |
Items of property, plant and equipment are stated measured at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any.
Depreciation is recognized so as to write off the cost less their residual values, using the straight-line basis. Land is not depreciated. Assets held under finance leases are depreciated over their expected useful lives on the same basis as owned assets or, where shorter, the term of the relevant lease.
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognized upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset. Any gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an item of property, plant and equipment is determined as the difference between the sale proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and is recognized in profit or loss.
The useful life of each class of property, plant and equipment, is as follows:
Classes of Property, Plant and Equipment | Years of Useful Life |
Buildings: | |
Tower on Pedro de Valdivia N°100 | 100 |
Agustinas N°1490 | 60 |
Agencies | 40 - 60 |
Plant and equipment | 10 - 5 |
IT Equipment | 5 |
Fixed installations and accessories | 10 |
Other property, plant and equipment | 5 |
k. | Impairment of Tangible and Intangible Assets other than Goodwill |
At the end of each reporting period, Provida reviews the carrying amount of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment at least annually, and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.
If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, Provida estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognized immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease.
When an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase.
l. | Financial Liabilities |
Financial liabilities are initially recorded at fair value, net transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, the financial liabilities are recognized at their amortized cost, using the effective interest rate method.
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial liability and of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments (including all fees and points paid or received that form an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts) through the expected life of the financial liability, or (where appropriate) a shorter period, to the net carrying amount on initial recognition.
Provida derecognizes financial liabilities when, and only when, its obligations are discharged, cancelled or they expire. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability derecognized and the consideration paid and payable is recognized in profit or loss.
m. | Provisions |
Provisions are recognized when Provida has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that Provida will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
The amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. When a provision is measured using the cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation, its carrying amount is the present value of those cash flows.
Contingent liabilities are a possible obligation that arises from past events and whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the entity; or are present obligations that arise from past events but are not recognized because it is not probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation; or the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability.
Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the financial statements; they are only disclosed in the notes to the financial statements, unless the possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote.
Contingent assets are a possible asset that arises from past events and whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the entity. Contingent assets are not recognized in the financial statements but must be disclosed where an inflow of economic benefits is probable.
m.1. Provisions for unfavorable casualty rate:
Until June 30, 2009, the AFPs were required by law to purchase insurance policies to provide its participants life and disability coverage. Life and disability insurance is for those participants who, in case of disability or death, do not have sufficient funds in their individual capitalization account to finance their pensions as required by law, whereby
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
the insurance company, contracted by the AFP, covers the difference in case of death. For cases of partial disability, the AFP must have provisions to cover the deficit three years later once the final determination has been made, taking into account the three years of temporary pension payments that the affiliate receives after the initial disability determination was made. Under the Pension Reform Law, and from October 2008, a participant with total disability status will receive immediate payment, once his/her status has been confirmed by a Medical Commission.
The insurance company makes these calculations at the time of the initial disability determination, three years before it makes the payments to cover the deficit and if required by the final determination, based on information available on that date, including information on rates for life annuities and funds of the participants’ individual capitalization account. If the final determination confirmed the disability status of a participant, the insurance company revises the amount of the initial disability reserve, based on information available at this time.
Towards the end of the 1990’s, Provida observed requirements for additional payments to the insurance company due to an excessive casualty rate reported each year by the insurance company. Provida concluded that, for specific discount rates situations, the estimate made by the insurance company used to provision the amounts for future disability payments underestimated the effective amounts that the Company had to pay.
Regulations of the Superintendency of Pensions do not require AFPs to make additional provisions over those amounts reported by the insurance company unless the AFPs have evidence indicating a higher provision. Provida has developed a casualty rate model to more accurately accrue the amounts that will be required to be paid to disabled participants once the final determination is made. The basic assumption of the casualty model is to attempt to use its best estimate at the time of the initial disability determination, using the information it believes will be applicable as to payment (final determination). The variables associated with the model are: disability status, rate of return of pension funds over the three years of the temporarily disabled period, and interest rate prevailing at the moment of payment (expected rate). This estimate differ from that used by insurance companies which only use information relating to the disabled status of persons at the time of the initial determination, that is, three years before payments.
Therefore, over the term of an insurance contract, the Company measures and accrues the expected cost to the insurer. In fact, through the application of the casualty rate model, the provisions made by Provida with respect to future premium payments to be made to the insurer reflects more accurately the effective payments that it will have to make, so there is a higher correlation between its revenues and expenses for a specific period. The information for the casualty rate model is reviewed monthly, making any modification considered appropriate at that moment.
According to the accounting principle applied by Provida, if the casualty rate calculated by the model is higher than the casualty rate calculated and maintained by the insurance company, then the amounts calculated by the Provida’s model will be used. On the contrary, if the casualty rate calculated by the model is lower than the one calculated by the insurance company, then the amount calculated by the insurance company will be provisioned, which is considered to be the minimum amount under existing regulation.
In view of the lower rates used in the casualty rate model to discount disability payments with regard to the prevailing rates used by the insurance company, the casualty rate calculated by the model is higher than the casualty rate recorded by the insurance company. Therefore, as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, Provida has recorded a higher expense than the one determined by the insurance company because it believes the amount calculated by the model is the best estimate of the fair value of the obligation.
m.2. Provisions for Employee Benefits
Short-term employee benefits – Short-term benefits include wages, employee vacations, profit-sharing and bonuses payable within twelve months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service. Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are expensed as the related service is provided. A liability is recognized for the amount expected to be paid under profit-sharing plans if the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of a past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably.
Other long-term employee benefits – All employees are entitled to receive years of service award starting with the 5th year employment anniversary and each five years thereafter, up to 30 years. This award is paid in the month when the employee celebrates his/her corresponding employment anniversary. Provida’s net obligation in respect of long-term
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
employee benefits is the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods; that benefit is discounted to determine its present value. The calculation is performed using the projected unit credit method. Any actuarial gains or losses are recognized in profit or loss in the period in which they arise.
Long-term Incentive (LTI) - The General Shareholders’ meeting of BBVA Bank (controlling parent company) held in Spain on March 13, 2009, approved a Multi-Year Variable Retribution Program of Shares for members of the BBVA Group’s directorship team (“the Program”) which includes several executives of AFP Provida. The Program became effective on April 15, 2009. Liquidation for the LTI 2009-2010 took place on April 15, 2011.
Provida has not granted any post-employment benefits to its employees.
n. | Current taxes and deferred taxes |
n.1. Income Tax
In accordance with current tax legislation, the Administrator constitutes provisions for income taxes based on taxable profit for the year, at a tax rate of 20% in December 2011 and 17% in December 2010, as instructed by Chilean Internal Revenue Services, and as required by Decree Law 824 of the Income Tax Law.
On July 31, 2010, Law Nº 20.455 was enacted, in order to finance the reconstruction of the country after the earthquake which occurred on February 27, 2010. This law, incorporated temporarily increases in tax rates for commercial years 2011 and 2012 (20% and 18.5%, respectively), and returns to an original 17% in 2013. On September 27, 2012, the Law N° 20,630 regarding the tax reform law was published in the Official Gazette that increases the first category tax rate at 20% for the commercial year 2012.
Current tax for current and prior periods, to the extent unpaid, is recognized as a liability. If the amount already paid in respect of current and prior periods exceeds the amount due for those periods, the excess is recognized as an asset.
The benefit relating to a tax loss that can be carried back to recover current tax of a previous period shall be recognized as an asset.
n.2. Deferred taxes
Deferred taxes are recognized on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all temporary taxable differences, and deferred tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which those deductible temporary differences can be utilized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not recognized if the temporary differences arise from goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and associates, and interest in joint ventures, except where Provida is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences associated with such investments and interests are only recognized to the extent that it is probable that there will be sufficient taxable profits against which to utilize the benefits of the temporary differences and they are expected to reverse in the foreseeable future.
The carrying amount of the deferred tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period in which the liability is settled or the asset realized, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period. The measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities reflects the tax
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
consequences that would follow from the manner in which Provida expects, at the end of the reporting period, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when Provida has a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation and intends to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis.
o. | Minimum dividend |
The policy on dividends includes the constitution of an obligation, which will be accrued at the end of each reporting period, when the amount of interim dividends paid against profit for the year is less than the minimum dividend established in the dividend policy agreed on during the General Shareholders’ meeting. The shortfall will be accrued as a dividend payable.
Regarding dividends payments, the Board of Directors has agreed to pay an interim dividend in October of each year and a final dividend after the Annual General Shareholders’ meeting to be held in the following year, for a total amount equal to 100% of the profits for the year, which amounts will be dependent on the fulfillment of the forecasted results, cash flow requirements to finance mandatory investments and development of the company and the final profit for the year.
p. | Earnings per share |
Basic earnings per share shall be calculated by dividing profit or loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent entity (the numerator) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. For all periods presented, Provida did not engage in any transactions of any kind that have potential dilutive effects leading to diluted earnings per share that could differ from basic earnings per share.
q. | Revenue recognition |
Fee income from the Pension Fund is recognized when all the activities relating to the administration of the Pension Funds have been completed. Fee income is not recognized for the Pension Funds’ individual account administration until the contributions have been credited.
r. | Information on Capital |
Due to the nature of the pension business and its leadership in this market, Provida has significant and sufficient cash flows from fees received from mandatory and voluntary pension savings, allowing it to finance
business-related expenses such as employee salaries, administration expenses and life and disability insurance expenses effective until June 30, 2009 in accordance with the Pension Reform Law; in addition to the use of funds associated with the additional constitution of mandatory investments and payment of dividends which are also covered by cash flows generated by its operations, as well as by short-term debts in case of need. These sources of funds have been sufficient to finance the aforementioned requirements, and additional capital requirements are not foreseen in the near term.
In terms of capital regulatory requirements, the Pension Funds Administrators must have a minimum Equity expressed in unidades de fomento or U.F. (inflation-indexed unit of account) according to the number of participants the Administrator has on the date of the financial statements, as shown in the following table:
Number of participants | Number of U.F. required |
Less than 5,000 | 5,000 |
5,000 – 7,499 | 10,000 |
7,500 – 9,999 | 15,000 |
10,000 or more | 20,000 |
Since its constitution, Provida has not had any problems complying with the foregoing requirement and, as of December 31, 2012, its Equity under IFRS amounts to U.F. 11,805,767.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
s. | Risk Management Policy |
AFP Provida’s future financial position and results of operations are exposed to foreign currency, interest rates, mandatory investments and life and disability insurance risks. During the normal course of business, Provida manages the risk exposure of its operating and investing activities as described below:
s.1. Foreign currency exchange risk
Provida is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks through the foreign operations carried out through its wholly owned subsidiary Provida Internacional. As of December 31, 2012, Provida has invested MUS$71 in foreign operations which, at the same date, have generated MCh$9,963 in profits for Provida.
The devaluation of affiliate companies’ local currencies with respect to the US dollar and the appreciation of the latter with respect to the Chilean peso could adversely affect the share of income recognized by Provida, and hence, its respective profit.
s.2. Interest rate risk
Due to requirements for working capital, the Company may be exposed to minor interest rate risks resulting from financing through credit lines. Current leasing obligations are not subject to interest rate risk since the rates are predefined (fixed) in the respective contracts.
s.3. Mandatory investments
Provida’s principal financial investment is the mandatory investments, constituted by law and equivalent to 1% of pension funds under administration. Provida must keep this 1% invested in shares of each one of the administrated funds. Mandatory investments of the pension funds represented a 53.2% and 51.6% of total assets under management of Provida as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 respectively and, in view of the volatility seen in local and foreign markets where pension funds are invested, the future gains or loss on mandatory investments has posed certain risks to the stability of the Company’s income.
Although gains and losses on mandatory investments have certain risks to the stability of the Company’s results in view of the evolution of the returns obtained by different portfolio compositions in the pension funds, the greatest risk associated with mandatory investments is non-compliance with the minimum rate of return requirement.
In addition to the aforementioned items, it is worthwhile mentioning that mandatory investments are constituted with the purpose of compensating participants in case the Company cannot meet the legal requirement of minimum returns, hence, entailing an equity loss for the AFP if this occurred, since it must additionally replace the 1% reserve with its own resources. Minimum return is calculated in terms of the average returns of the pension fund industry for rolling periods of 36 months.
The risks described above are associated to Provida’s trust management, governed by the objective to optimize the income of each one of the funds for a specific risk level or else to minimize the risk level in order to obtain an objective profit.
In order to attain the foregoing, Provida has a risk management policy in place that defines the activities and criteria it applies to efficiently identify, measure, control and manage the risks associated to fund management. Hence, Provida manages the fund equities according to internal credit risk limits, analyzing expected losses and applying market risk measurements. The latter refers to absolute VaR which measures the probable impact on the different types of funds in case of adverse shocks of instrument prices (fixed income, currencies and variable income). Furthermore, in order to ensure the Company’s solvency, guarantee future benefit payments and comply with minimum return requirements, Provida applies relative VaR over diverging positions between each fund and the system’s model portfolio.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Absolute and Relative VaR by type of fund as of December 31, 2012 was as follows:
Type of Fund | Relative VaR | Absolute VaR | Absolute VaR in MCh$ |
A | 0.294% | 3.186% | 99,445.05 |
B | 0.287% | 2.305% | 84,508.22 |
C | 0.253% | 1.611% | 153,588.34 |
D | 0.178% | 0.917% | 34,815.45 |
E | 0.213% | 0.511% | 8,190.33 |
Additionally the Company makes monthly measurements of minimum returns that are presented to the Board of Directors Meeting. The calculation presented at the end of 2012 was the following:
Fund Type A | Fund Type B | Fund Type C | Fund Type D | Fund Type E | |
Average Returns | 1.86% | 2.75% | 3.41% | 3.79% | 4.87% |
Method -4% (-2%) (1) | -2.14% | -1.25% | 1.41% | 1.79% | 2.87% |
Method 50% (2) | 0.93% | 1.37% | 1.70% | 1.89% | 2.43% |
Minimum Return | -2.14% | -1.25% | 1.41% | 1.79% | 2.43% |
Provida’s Return | 1.63% | 2.53% | 3.08% | 3.61% | 4.51% |
Provida’s excess over minimum return | 3.77% | 3.78% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 2.08% |
Ranking minimum return | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
Initial date measurement | Dec-09 | Dec-09 | Dec-09 | Dec-09 | Dec-09 |
Final date measurement | Dec-12 | Dec-12 | Dec-12 | Dec-12 | Dec-12 |
Number of months | 36 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 36 |
(1) | The annualized real average return for the last 36 months of all fund of the same type, as corresponds, minus 4%. |
(2) | The annualized real average return for the last 36 months of all fund of the same type, as corresponds, minus the absolute value of 50% of such return. |
VaR methodology
The Risk Division performs daily monitoring of the risks associated with investments in the various Funds. The approach is carried out by using the Parametric VaR methodology and assuming a normal distribution of asset returns.
The VaR model to the market risk measurement provides a maximum loss with a probability level that may occur in the market positions during a certain period of time.
Two risk measurements are carried out: Absolute VaR and Relative VaR. The Absolute VaR measures the market risk of the Funds that directly impacts the value of the Fund's shares. Moreover, the Relative VaR measures the market risk of a particular Fund over the same Fund of the Benchmark comprised of a weighted average from the rest of AFPs belonging to the Chilean Pension System.
Given the assumption of normality, the approach of covariance matrix VaR is used, through which the future performance of the market variables is expressed through a group of volatilities (reflecting the amount of relative changes in the market variables) and correlations (indicating the degree of compensation of these variations among them), which were obtained from an analysis of the historical performance of such variables.
Particularly, the model is implemented daily by using the exponential smoothing methodology with a parameter of 0.925 in the construction of the covariance matrix. The latest 100 results of returns are used for the calculation. Finally, a 99% confidence level and a monthly loss horizon is established.
Additionally, we performed a sensitivity analysis of the potential impacts that may result from movements in the positions, given the latest information of the market variables, that is, underlying variances and correlations. In this way, positions providing a great risk in the managed portfolios can be closed.
Limitations of the sensitivity analysis
The model has two potential limitations. The first limitation comes from the assumption that the asset returns follow a normal distribution, which is not always the case. The second limitation relates to the measurement of the relative risk
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
due to the Benchmark’s inference, since the information of the positions held by the AFPs is only known once a month and with an average of 11 days of delay, and in order to estimate the relative risk during each day, assumptions about the positions of the Benchmark must be made.
s.4. Life and disability benefits
Life and disability (L&D) insurance is a long-term obligation, given that the benefit promised to disabled participants is granted three years after the first ruling of disability, in the case of partial disability (50% to two thirds of loss of capacities), in other words the final ruling of disability. Up until October 2009, benefits for total disability (more than two thirds of loss of capacities) were also granted after three years.
In quantitative terms, the AFP must cover the payment deficit equivalent to the difference between the affiliate’s savings in his individual capitalization account and benefits established by law. These benefits correspond to the current value of a life annuity (equivalent to 70% or 50% of the average taxable income of the affiliate during the last ten years) discounted from the life annuity rates prevailing at the time of payment. Subsequently, the evolution of said interest rates impacts the final value of the payment of the obligation by Provida.
One of the changes introduced by the Pension Reform was the elimination of the individual responsibility of the AFPs regarding L&D insurance benefits. Hence, starting July 1, 2009, a number of insurance companies were awarded the management of L&D insurance for a 12 month period. Subsequently in July 2010, the second bidding process was carried out for the next 24 months.Finally, in July 2012 a third bidding process was carried out for the next 24 months. Provida now basically keeps, for the concept of L&D insurance, the obligation of claims pending payment for the period of temporary disability, with the contract currently at the run-off stage.
Additionally, in terms of L&D insurance business, regulation stipulates that the reserves for claims be evaluated at market rate instead of historical rates (minimum of the previous semester), opening up a legal window for insurance companies to voluntarily apply said methodology to old contracts. BBVA Life Insurance, upon request from AFP Provida, resorted to this new regulation since, by doing so, the value of its liabilities would be closer to the actual amount at the time of payment (fair value). Furthermore, upon mutual agreement of the parties (prior to compensation to the insurance company due to the change in conditions), the AFP’s financial performance was modified of its cash surpluses, with a benchmark determined by assets with a similar duration to the liabilities of the insurance.
In view of the changes made in the assets and liabilities management associated to disability insurance, AFP Provida has mitigated the risk associated to the interest rate evolution.
t. | Classification of non-current assets held for sale |
Non-current assets are classified as held for sale if their carrying value will be recovered mainly through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. As evidenced by it is being available for sale in its present condition and the sale is highly probable. This condition is considered as met provided that the sale is highly probable and the non-current asset (or disposal group) is available for immediate sale in its present condition. The administration should undertake to sale, which should be recognized as a concluded sale within the period of one year from the date of classification.
Non-current assets classified as held for sale are measured at their lower carrying value and their fair value less costs associated with the sale.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was MCh$41,245 and MCh$36,091, respectively and is detailed as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Time Deposits | 35,533 | 28,942 | ||||||
Cash in banks | 5,698 | 7,136 | ||||||
Cash on hand | 14 | 13 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 41,245 | 36,091 |
Time deposits have a maturity of less than three months from the date of acquisition.
There are no amounts of cash and cash equivalents held by Provida that are not available for its use.
NOTE 6. MANDATORY INVESTMENTS
In order to ensure minimum return requirement of the pension funds, as referred to in article 37 of D.L. 3,500 of 1980, and in compliance with article 40 of the same law, the Administrator must hold an asset known as Mandatory Investment in each Fund Type administrated, equivalent to 1% of each pension fund, which must be invested in shares of the corresponding pension fund.
For all periods presented the Company has complied with the minimum reserve and minimum return requirements.
As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Administrator held Mandatory Investments for MCh$217,072 and MCh$201,418 in the Pension Funds it administers, in accordance with the following detail:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
MCh$ | Shares | MCh$ | Shares | |||||||||||||
Pension Funds - Type A | 31,324 | 1,151 | 32,178 | 1,285 | ||||||||||||
Pension Funds - Type B | 36,773 | 1,531 | 35,629 | 1,595 | ||||||||||||
Pension Funds - Type C | 95,326 | 3,841 | 89,593 | 3,869 | ||||||||||||
Pension Funds - Type D | 37,772 | 1,761 | 33,762 | 1,676 | ||||||||||||
Pension Funds - Type E | 15,877 | 602 | 10,256 | 411 | ||||||||||||
Total Mandatory Investment | 217,072 | 201,418 |
Gains and losses on mandatory investments as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were MCh$14,515, (MCh$3,469) and MCh$21,886, respectively and is detailed as follows:
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Gain (loss) on mandatory investment held in pension fund Type A | 2,588 | (3,106 | ) | 4,956 | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on mandatory investment held in pension fund Type B | 2,617 | (1,700 | ) | 4,878 | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on mandatory investment held in pension fund Type C | 6,405 | (378 | ) | 9,314 | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on mandatory investment held in pension fund Type D | 2,231 | 1,187 | 2,309 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on mandatory investment held in pension fund Type E | 674 | 528 | 429 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on mandatory investments | 14,515 | (3,469 | ) | 21,886 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 7. REVENUE
Revenue for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
For the years December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Fee income (a) | 153,415 | 140,359 | 130,273 | |||||||||
Other revenue (c) | 10,303 | 12,889 | 17,183 | |||||||||
Total | 163,718 | 153,248 | 147,456 |
a. | Fee income |
Total fee income charged by the Administrator to the Pension Funds it administers as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, were MCh$153,415, MCh$140,359 and MCh$130,273 respectively.
Fee income corresponds to the following concepts:
For the years December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Fees for depositing Mandatory Contributions and APV (Variable fee) | 150,643 | 137,664 | 128,001 | |||||||||
Fees for programmed withdrawals and temporary income (Variable fee) | 2,772 | 2,695 | 2,272 | |||||||||
Total | 153,415 | 140,359 | 130,273 |
b. | Fees receivable |
As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, Fees Receivable presented within the line item Trade and Other Receivables (see Note 8) corresponded to the following concepts:
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Fees Receivable: | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||
Fund Type A | 22 | (1 | ) | |||||
Fund Type B | 38 | 25 | ||||||
Fund Type C | 63 | 184 | ||||||
Fund Type D | 23 | (15 | ) | |||||
Fund Type E | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Total | 147 | 194 |
c. | Other revenues |
Other revenues as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 of the Administrator were as follows:
For the years December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Other Revenues | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||
Other revenues - AFP Génesis Ecuador (1) | 7,784 | 9,274 | 8,488 | |||||||||
Insurance contracts settlements (2) | 953 | 2,151 | 7,126 | |||||||||
Services rendered by AFC (Unemployment Fund) (4) | 355 | 491 | 690 | |||||||||
Surcharges and collection costs (3) | 685 | 596 | 618 | |||||||||
Revenue for additional contributions (3) | 397 | 372 | 261 | |||||||||
Other revenues | 129 | 5 | - | |||||||||
Total | 10,303 | 12,889 | 17,183 |
(1) Revenues from fees charged by Ecuadorian subsidiary AFP Genesis for rendering services to administer the Unemployment Fund.
(2) Other revenues of life and disability insurance originating from the surplus cash of insurance companies, in view of the premium payments made by the Company.
(3) Surcharge and recovery of collection costs for contributions that are not paid on time, benefiting the Administrator under D.L. 3,500, Article 19.
(4) Revenues from services provided and software sold to Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía de Chile S.A. (‘AFC’).
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 8. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the current and non-current balances of this item are as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Non-Current | Current | Non-Current | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Accounts receivable from insurance companies (1) | 3,311 | - | 3,687 | - | ||||||||||||
Fees receivable (2) | 147 | - | 194 | - | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable from Pension Funds | 397 | - | 415 | - | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable from the State (3) | 1,811 | - | 192 | - | ||||||||||||
Other accounts receivable | 2,800 | 519 | 2,551 | 329 | ||||||||||||
Total Trade and Other Receivables | 8,466 | 519 | 7,039 | 329 |
(1) Includes items to be recovered from insurance companies (See note 13 f.1)
(2) Includes fees receivable from pension funds (See note 7 b.)
(3) Includes items to be recovered from the State (See note 13 f.2)
a. | Accounts receivable from Pensions Funds |
The detail of this item is as follows:
As of December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||||
Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | Type E | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||||||||
Regularization contributions (*) | - | - | 222 | - | - | 222 | ||||||||||||||||||
Banking charges | - | - | 2 | - | - | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Indemnization accounts | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Programmed withdrawals | 5 | 10 | 21 | 105 | 20 | 161 | ||||||||||||||||||
Voluntary pensions savings | - | - | 11 | - | - | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 6 | 10 | 256 | 105 | 20 | 397 |
(*) It includes MCh$103 corresponding to regularization contributions made by the Company in Pension Funds in order to regularize mistakes in the individual accounts of participants.
As of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||||
Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | Type E | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||||||||
Regularization contributions | - | - | 194 | - | - | 194 | ||||||||||||||||||
Banking charges | - | - | 2 | - | - | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Indemnization accounts | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Programmed withdrawals | 2 | 4 | 19 | 78 | 12 | 115 | ||||||||||||||||||
Voluntary pensions savings | - | - | 91 | - | - | 91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 5 | 7 | 311 | 79 | 13 | 415 |
b. Other accounts receivable
The details of this item are as follows:
Years ended as of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Non-Current | Current | Non-Current | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Medical leave absences | 69 | 23 | 89 | - | ||||||||||||
Advances to suppliers | 39 | - | 16 | - | ||||||||||||
Other - AFP Genesis | 1,106 | - | 1,239 | - | ||||||||||||
Other receivables (*) | 1,586 | 496 | 1,207 | 329 | ||||||||||||
Total Other Accounts Receivables | 2,800 | 519 | 2,551 | 329 |
(*) Includes MCh$369 corresponding to tax credit receivable from the General Treasury and MCh$311 corresponding to discounted amount receivable from retired participants.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 9. INVENTORIES
The detail of inventories as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows.
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Forms for public use | 98 | 148 | ||||||
Internal manual forms | 27 | 53 | ||||||
Maintenance supplies | 1 | 34 | ||||||
Computer material | 41 | 68 | ||||||
Office supplies | 52 | 50 | ||||||
Data processing forms | 7 | 20 | ||||||
Communications with participants and publicity material | 28 | 11 | ||||||
Cafeteria supplies and products | 9 | 11 | ||||||
Total inventories | 263 | 395 |
NOTE 10. PREPAYMENTS
The detail of current and non-current prepayments as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Non-Current | Current | Non-Current | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Insurance | 33 | - | 29 | - | ||||||||||||
Advertising | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Advisory services | 16 | - | 35 | - | ||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses | 13 | - | 14 | - | ||||||||||||
Other | 231 | - | 391 | 216 | ||||||||||||
Total prepayments | 293 | - | 469 | 216 |
NOTE 11. BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED ENTITIES
All transactions with related parties are approved by the Board of Directors, and have been performed on market conditions or on similar terms to those usually prevailing in the market.
a. Accounts receivable from related entities
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 the Administrator presented a balance for Accounts Receivable from Related Entities as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Non-Current | Current | Non-Current | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. | 2,720 | - | 5,577 | - | ||||||||||||
BBVA Chile S.A. | 103 | - | 173 | - | ||||||||||||
Soc. Adm. de Fondos de Cesantía Chile S.A. | - | - | 21 | - | ||||||||||||
BBVA Comercializadora Ltda. | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Servicios de Administración Previsional S.A. | 588 | - | 436 | - | ||||||||||||
BBVA Servicios Corporativos Ltda. | - | - | 1 | - | ||||||||||||
Total | 3,411 | - | 6,208 | - |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For all periods presented, no guarantees has been given or received nor has any allowance for doubtful accounts been recorded in respect of accounts receivables from related parties.
b. Accounts payable to related entities
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Administrator presented a balance for Accounts Payable to Related Entities as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Non-Current | Current | Non-Current | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. | 36 | - | 17 | - | ||||||||||||
Servicios de Administracion Previsional S.A. (collection contract and others) | 673 | - | 1,061 | - | ||||||||||||
BBVA Chile S.A. (collection contract, pension payments and savings) | 32 | - | 133 | - | ||||||||||||
BBVA España | 2 | - | 38 | - | ||||||||||||
BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A. (CMA) | 20 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Aplica Soluciones Tecnológicas Ltda. | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Aplica Tecnología Avanzada (former CCR Bancomer) | - | - | 117 | - | ||||||||||||
BBVA Servicios Corporativos Ltda. | 12 | - | 456 | - | ||||||||||||
Total | 775 | - | 1,822 | - |
c. Detail of transactions with related parties
Company | Transaction | Amount of transactions | Effect on revenues (expense) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||||
BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A. | Purchase of software license Software License | 2,832 | 2,832 | 3,578 | (566 | ) | (566 | ) | (610 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Software Maintenance Service (CMA) | - | - | 73 | - | - | (73 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Office Rental | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Self service dispenser lease | 107 | 114 | 40 | (107 | ) | (114 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
BBVA Corredores de Bolsa S.A. | Financial services | 62 | 169 | 163 | (62 | ) | (169 | ) | (163 | ) | |||||||||||||||
BBVA Chile S.A. | Rentals (agencies, BBVA Tower) | 1,211 | 1,250 | 1,588 | 1,211 | 1,250 | 1,588 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rentals (agencies, Huérfanos and Bandera Tower) | 520 | 518 | 543 | (520 | ) | (518 | ) | (543 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Community fees as lessor | 33 | 167 | 248 | 33 | 167 | 248 | |||||||||||||||||||
Community fees as lessee | 96 | 210 | 76 | (96 | ) | (210 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Pension payment service | 7 | 26 | 161 | (7 | ) | (26 | ) | (161 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Collection contract | - | 4 | 3 | - | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Expense for bank account maintenance | 3 | 1 | 46 | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Savings payment service | 11 | 50 | 80 | (11 | ) | (50 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash payment service | 4 | - | - | (4 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of real estate | 1,997 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Sale of real estate | (966 | ) | - | - | 1,005 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
BBVA Compañía de Seguros de Vida S.A. | Premiums paid and provisioned | 329 | 370 | 649 | (329 | ) | (370 | ) | (649 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Casualty rate provision | (4,047 | ) | (3,031 | ) | 1,690 | 4,047 | 3,031 | (1,690 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial revenue provision | 953 | 2,151 | 7,126 | 953 | 2,159 | 7,126 | |||||||||||||||||||
Insurance settlement | 2,604 | 990 | 933 | - | - | - |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Company | Transaction | Amount of transactions | Effect on revenues (expense) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Servicio de Administración Previsional S.A. | Electronic collection service | 1,620 | 1,624 | 1,517 | (1,620 | ) | (1,624 | ) | (1,517 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Young worker subsidy | 17 | 15 | 11 | (17 | ) | (15 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
DNPA (declaration of non-payment) service | 44 | 94 | 85 | (44 | ) | (94 | ) | (85 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Password administration | 128 | 166 | 73 | (128 | ) | (166 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Data processing | 28 | 147 | 519 | (28 | ) | (147 | ) | (519 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
File transference | 9 | 14 | 12 | (9 | ) | (14 | ) | (12 | ) |
Technological services | 3 | 5 | 7 | (3 | ) | (5 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
SAS 70 report | - | (11 | ) | 12 | - | 11 | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
MAC Service | - | 24 | - | - | (24 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Monitoring Service | - | 1 | - | - | (1 | ) | - |
Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía Chile S.A. | Technological consulting and services | 269 | 219 | 235 | 269 | 219 | 235 | ||||||||||||||||||
Technological Supportive Services | 86 | 271 | 455 | 86 | 271 | 455 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans in current account | - | - | (84 | ) | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Aplica Tecnología Avanzada S.A. (former BBVA Bancomer Servicios S.A.) | Data Processing | 1,481 | 1,428 | 1,143 | (1,481 | ) | (1,428 | ) | (1,143 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. | AFP technological platform service | 26 | 57 | 43 | (26 | ) | (57 | ) | (43 | ) | |||||||||||||||
BBVA Servicios Corporativos Ltda. | Outsourcing services for corporate support | 3,943 | 5,102 | 5,524 | (3,943 | ) | (5,102 | ) | (5,524 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Office rentals | 503 | 491 | 479 | 503 | 491 | 479 | |||||||||||||||||||
Common Charges as lessee | 21 | 21 | 35 | 21 | 56 | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||
Aplica Soluciones Tecnológicas Chile Ltda. | Software development | 655 | 412 | 73 | (15 | ) | (36 | ) | (73 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Technological services | 51 | - | - | (51 | ) | - | - |
Description of transactions with related parties for the period ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:
BBVA Inversiones Chile S.A.:
Transactions with this entity in 2012, 2011 and 2010 refer to:
i) | Service rendering contract entered into on December 27, 2006 regarding transactional services through self-serving dispensers that include issuance of certificates about contributions, affiliations, balance sheets and others, amounting to MCh$107, MCh$114 and MCh$40 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
ii) | Lease contracts regarding rentals of square meters in Provida’s branch offices to install self-serving dispensers for a total amounting to MCh$1, MCh$1 and MCh$1 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
iii) | Software license contract entered into on December 1, 2005 and new contract in 2010, corresponding to intellectual property rights related to the use, as well as, instructions for use and functionality, of software implemented on different operating and administrative processes, amounting to MCh$2,832 as of December 31, 2012, MCh$2,832 as of December 31, 2011 and MCh$3,578 as of December 31, 2010. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, enhancements for new projects were incorporated amounting to MCh$0, MCh$0 and MCh$746, respectively. |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BBVA Bancomer Servicios (Mexico):
Contract entered into on December 29, 2004 for data processing corresponding to operating and administrative applications. This service is rendered by the regional computing center (CCR). The outstanding balances of MCh$1,481 at December 31, 2012, MCh$1,428 at December 31, 2011 and MCh$1,143 at December 31, 2010 are included in the “Miscellaneous other operating expenses” line item.
This contract was transferred in 2011 to Aplica Tecnologia Avanzada S.A., as a result of the merger between BBVA Bancomer and BBVA Bancomer Servicios S.A.
BBVA Corredores de Bolsa S.A.: Transactions with this entity are related to financial services rendered to Provida.
BBVA Chile S.A.: Transactions with this entity are related to rental contracts, collection services, pension payments and saving withdrawals, lines of credit, loans and current accounts.
BBVA Compañía de Seguros de Vida S.A.: On January 1, 2005, BBVA Compañía de Seguros de Vida S.A. was awarded the bid for Provida’s L&D insurance for a coverage period to June 30, 2009.
Servicios de Administración Previsional S.A.: This subsidiary renders services to Provida for electronic collection, password administration, data processing, data transference and technological services.
Sociedad Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía de Chile S.A: Provida receives revenues from the AFC (Unemployment Fund) for rendering technological support and technological advisory services.
The Administrators as a group have provided the AFC with a supportive and undividable guarantee of UF 400,000. This guarantee, in accordance with Provida’s equity interest in the company (37.8%), amounts to MCh$3,454 or approximately MUS$7 and was requested so that the AFC could comply with the credit operations with regard to the eventual coverage of bank guarantee letters, expiring on April 25, 2013.
On February 4, 2010, the Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía reimbursed the Administrator with bank guarantee letters for UF 160,000 (MCh$3,655).
In the Board of Directors’ meeting held on January 18, 2013, Provida’s Chief Executive Officer informed that the basis of the Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía II’s tender offer were published, but pointing out that AFP Provida will not take part in such offer.
The contract with Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía Chile S.A. ends in October 2013, once Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía Chile S.A II begins operations.
Aplica Soluciones Tecnológicas Chile Ltda.: Contract dated January 4, 2010, corresponds to design and development services of the software systems, amounting to MCh$655 as of December 31, 2012, MCh$412 as of December 31, 2011 and MCh$73 as of December 31, 2010. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, enhancements for new projects were incorporated amounting to MCh$ 243, MCh$279 and MCh$133 respectively.
BBVA Servicios Corporativos Limitada: Contract dated January 1, 2010 for outsourcing the Company’s services. The contract will last for 10 years and is renewable for 10-year periods.
On August 31, 2012, the Board of Directors of AFP Provida S.A. approved the internalization of most of the support services subcontract to the related company BBVA Servicios Corporativos Limitada, which led to amend the Contract subscribed in January 2010 for the purpose of reducing the rendered services and reducing the annual cost.
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A.: Contract dated December 16, 2009 corresponding to rendering computing services, including consultancy and server maintenance and a help desk.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Board of Directors and key management personnel:
d. Accounts receivable and payable and other transactions
There are no outstanding amounts receivables or payable between Provida and the members of the Board of Directors and key management personnel. No guarantees have been given or received from Directors or Key management personnel. No other transactions have been performed between Provida and the members of the Board of Directors and key management personnel.
d.1 Compensation of Key management personnel
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Salaries | 2,756 | 2,715 | 2,685 | |||||||||
Short-term benefits for employees | 1,155 | 937 | 1,308 | |||||||||
Termination benefits | 139 | 453 | 280 | |||||||||
Total remunerations of key management personnel | 4,050 | 4,105 | 4,273 |
In 2012, key management personnel consisted of 49 executives distributed in 23 managers, 13 deputy managers and 13 department chiefs. In 2011, key management personnel consisted of 47 executives distributed in 21 managers, 7 deputy managers and 19 department chiefs, while in 2010, there were 50 executives distributed in 19 managers, 7 deputy managers and 24 department chiefs.
d.2 Compensation of Board of Directors and Directors’ Committee
Compensation of the Board of Directors amounted to MCh$624, MCh$614 and MCh$290 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and have been presented within the line item “Miscellaneous other operating expenses”.
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Per Diem | 543 | 570 | 270 | |||||||||
Fees | 81 | 44 | 20 | |||||||||
Total | 624 | 614 | 290 |
The Board of Directors was elected in the General Shareholders’ meeting held on April 27, 2012 and, as of December 31, 2012 was composed as follows:
Name of Directors | Position |
Joaquín Cortez Huerta | Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Jesús del Pino Durán | Vice-Chairman |
Luis Fernando Ferreres Crespo | Director |
Francesc Jorda Carré | Director |
José Martos Vallecillos | Director |
María Cristina Bitar Maluk | Director |
Jorge Marshall Rivera | Director |
Osvaldo Puccio Huidobro | Alternate Director |
On May 14, 2012 Mr. Jorge Granic Latorre submitted his resignation to the alternate Director position.
Directors’ Committee:
According to the provisions established in Law 19,075 of December 20, 2000, and Circular N°1,956 of the Superintendency of Insurance and Securities of February 19, 2001, the Administrator formed the committee of directors which replaced the previous Audit Committee in its faculties and functions.
In compliance with the provisions set forth in Article 33 of Corporate Law N°18,046, fees of the Board are fixed annually in the Ordinary Shareholders’ meeting. The amounts approved for normal board meetings, extraordinary meetings and committee meetings, are established as follows:
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||
Name of Director | Position | Normal Meeting | Extraordinary Meeting | Maximum Amount | Directors' Committee | |||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Joaquín Cortez Huerta | Chairman | 250 | 10 | 260 | - | |||||
Jesús del Pino Durán | Vice-Chairman | 250 | 10 | 260 | 83 | |||||
Luis Fernando Ferreres Crespo | Director | 250 | 10 | 260 | - | |||||
Francesc Jorda Carré | Director | 250 | 10 | 260 | - | |||||
María Cristina Bitar Maluk | Director | 250 | 10 | 260 | 83 | |||||
José Martos Vallecillos | Director | 250 | 10 | 260 | - | |||||
Jorge Marshall Rivera | Director | 250 | 10 | 260 | 83 | |||||
Osvaldo Puccio Huidobro | Alternate Director | 175 | 7 | 182 | 83 |
NOTE 12. INCOME AND DEFERRED TAXES
a) Current tax assets and liabilities
a.1) Current tax assets
The detail of current tax assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Monthly provisional tax payments | 18,400 | 15,384 | ||||||
Credit for training expenses | 137 | 153 | ||||||
VAT tax credit | 78 | 90 | ||||||
Other tax assets | 235 | 298 | ||||||
Total | 18,850 | 15,925 |
a.2) Current tax liabilities
The detail of current tax liabilities as of December 31, 2012, 2011 is as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Income tax payable | 24,206 | 21,484 | ||||||
Adjustment for income taxes (previous period) | 1,214 | 324 | ||||||
Other deductions and additions | (1,022 | ) | 469 | |||||
Income taxes payable foreign associates | (2,477 | ) | (2,497 | ) | ||||
Other taxes (tax rate 35%) | 7 | 12 | ||||||
Total | 21,928 | 19,792 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
b) Deferred taxes
The deferred taxes recognized for deductible and taxable temporary differences as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:
Deferred tax assets | Deferred tax liabilities | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Temporary differences: | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax relating to depreciation | - | - | 1,746 | 1,801 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax relating to amortization | - | - | 6,207 | 6,219 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax relating to provisions | 896 | 876 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax relating to revaluation of mandatory investments | - | - | 25,364 | 19,092 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax relating to AFORE Bancomer | 2,545 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax relating to AFP Horizonte | (1,080 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||
Deferred taxes relating to other temporary differences | 9 | 99 | 158 | |||||||||||||
Total | 2,361 | 885 | 33,416 | 27,270 |
Deferred tax assets have been recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which the deductible temporary differences can be utilized. Management of Provida considers that sufficient taxable profits will be available to be utilized.
b.1) Movements in deferred taxes
The following table sets forth the changes in deferred taxes in the consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Assets | Liabilities | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Deferred tax movements | ||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2010 | 995 | 29,259 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in profit or loss | (110 | ) | (1,989 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in equity | - | - | ||||||
Other increase (decrease) | - | - | ||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2011 | 885 | 27,270 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in profit or loss | 1,476 | 6,146 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in equity | - | - | ||||||
Other increase (decrease) | - | - | ||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2012 | 2,361 | 33,416 |
c) Income taxes
c.1) Income tax expense
Income tax expense as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is detailed as follows:
As of December 31, | |||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Current tax expense | (24,206 | ) | (21,484 | ) | (15,581 | ) | |||||||
Other current tax income (expense) | 3,370 | 1,894 | 1,255 | ||||||||||
Current tax benefit expense (income), net | (20,836 | ) | (19,590 | ) | (14,326 | ) | |||||||
Deferred tax income (expense) relating to origination and reversal of temporary differences | (59 | ) | 1,879 | (2,698 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred tax income (expense) relating to tax rate changes or imposition of new taxes | 4,729 | - | (416 | ) | |||||||||
Deferred tax expense (income), net | (4,670 | ) | 1,879 | (3,114 | ) | ||||||||
Total income tax expense (income) | (25,506 | ) | (17,712 | ) | (17,440 | ) |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
d) Reconciliation of statutory tax rate with effective tax rate
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Profit before income tax | 129,538 | 96,567 | 109,064 | |||||||||
Statutory tax rate | 20 | % | 20 | % | 17 | % | ||||||
Income tax applied to profits before taxes | 25,908 | 19,313 | 18,541 | |||||||||
Permanent differences and others | (402 | ) | (1,601 | ) | (1,101 | ) | ||||||
Total tax for the period | 25,506 | 17,712 | 17,440 |
On July 31, 2010, the Law N˚20,455 was published in order to finance the country’s reconstruction, after the earthquake occurred on February 27, 2010, by temporarily increasing the tax rate at 20% for the commercial year 2011, then decreasing to a 18.5% tax rate for the commercial year 2012 and returning back to a 17% tax rate in commercial year 2013. However, on September 27, 2012, the Law N°20,630 was published in the Official Gazette regarding the Tax Reform Law that increased the first category tax rate at 20% from the commercial year 2012 onwards.
NOTE 13. LIFE AND DISABILITY INSURANCE
a) Financing life and disability pensions
Before the Pension Reform Law was amended, and according to provisions established by law, Provida had individually contracted insurance to cover its obligation to provide its participants life and disability benefits.
The Pension Reform Law eliminated the individual responsibility that AFPs had with life and disability insurance by establishing that the AFPs as a whole should contract, through public bidding, a fixed, single-premium insurance to cover this risk. This insurance is awarded to one or more insurance companies offering the best economic offer, awarding the insurance to more than one insurer in order to avoid excessive concentration and cover the entire life and disability insurance risk with the same value for all workers. This obligation is paid by the employer and became effective on July 1, 2009, and a temporary grace period for workers with fewer than 100 employees ended in June 2011. Commencing on July 1, 2011, this obligation is paid by the employer regardless of the number of employees hired.
The premium paid to June 30, 2010 was 1.87% of taxable salaries of workers.
The insurance companies awarded the coverage of claims until June 30, 2010, were as follows:
INSURANCE COMPANIES |
Interamericana Seguros de Vida S.A. |
RBS (Chile) Seguros de Vida S.A. |
Chilena Consolidada Seguros de Vida S.A. |
BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. |
Ohio National Seguros de Vida S.A. |
From July 1, 2010, and for a 24-month period, the new premium in force was 1.49% over the taxable salaries of workers.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Companies that were awarded were as follows:
INSURANCE COMPANIES |
BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. |
Ohio National Seguros de Vida S.A |
Compañía de Seguros de Vida Cámara S.A. |
La Interamericana Seguros de Vida S.A. |
Banchile Seguros de Vida S.A. and Euroamerica Seguros de Vida S.A. (coinsurance) |
Compañía de Seguros Cruz del Sur S.A. and Seguros Vida Security Previsión S.A. (coinsurance) |
Valora Compañía de Seguros de Vida S.A |
Finally, beginning on July 1, 2012, the average premium is 1.26%, and the companies awarded are as follows:
INSURANCE COMPANIES |
Chilena Consolidada Seguros de Vida S.A. |
CN Life |
Penta Vida y Bice Vida S.A. (coinsurance) |
Seguros Vida Security Previsión S.A. (coinsurance) |
Insurance coverage continues in the case that the participant dies or becomes disabled before the legal retirement age (65 for men and 65 for women starting October 2008) and when he/she has not accumulated sufficient funds in his/her individual capitalization account to finance the benefit payments as established by law, whether for him/her or his/her legal beneficiaries.
In addition, according to law, transitory disabled pensions awarded in accordance with the first ruling by the medical commission are also covered by the insurance.
The additional contribution that the insurance must cover, if necessary, continues to be equivalent to the resulting deficit between the capital necessary to finance life and disability insurance pensions and the capital accumulated per participant, including his/her recognition bond, to the occurrence date of the claim.
It is important to point out that, even though Provida does not have individual contracts with prevailing coverage, there is one contract described below that are still operating as a result from the modality of transitory disability that entails payments of disability claims three years after the first disability ruling, only if the disability has been confirmed by a definitive ruling.
b) Insurance Contract
Until June 2009, according to provisions established in legal regulations, Provida has contracted insurance that covers total temporary pensions of participants declared disabled in the first ruling, the additional contribution and the contribution (contributions during the disabled period in case not ratified in the second ruling). These contracts do not exempt Provida from the responsibility and obligation to deposit said additional contribution, pay transitory pensions originating from first rulings, administer contributions of individual capitalization accounts and make additional contributions to individual capitalization accounts of the participant when appropriate.
In operational terms regarding the contract in force until June 2009, during the first quarter of the year, Provida and the insurance company compare payments made by the Administrator in the previous fiscal year for temporary premiums (the “temporary premium”) and pre-settlements and the sum of (i) the effective amounts paid by the insurer to the participants or their beneficiaries (“Transitory pensions and contributions”) and (ii) the amount estimated by the insurer (“Technical reserves”) required to pay disabled participants once the final rulings or disabled status are declared by the Medical Commission (the sum of (i) and (ii) is referred to in this document as “total cost of casualties”). Additionally, the casualty rate corresponds to the ratio of the total cost of casualties over the taxable income of contributors. If the cost of casualties is higher than temporary payments, Provida must pay to the insurance company the difference up to a maximum limit established in the insurance contracts, based on maximum casualty rate. Provida has no obligation to pay
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
casualties exceeding the maximum rate. However, if the insurer is not able to pay the benefits to the participants, Provida would be responsible for such payments.
The last disability and survival insurance with effective coverage from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2009 was purchased from BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A (related company, see Note 11). The initial contract's maximum casualty rate was 1.27% expressed as a percentage of the contributing participants’ taxable remuneration, with a monthly premium paid throughout the coverage period of the contract at a temporary premium rate of 0.70%. Provida’s participation over the surplus was 100% if the casualty rate was equal to or lower than the contract’s maximum casualty rate over the contributing participants’ taxable income. Additionally, the contract established monthly payments calculated at a provisional rate of 0.70% applied to the total of remuneration and monthly taxable income of the participants on a one-month lag plus a monthly fixed premium of UF 2,150 during the coverage period of the contract. As a result of updating the mortality tables and the consequent impact in the higher casualty costs upon mutual assent of the parties, in view of the changes in the economic conditions of the contract, the parameters of the insurance contract were modified. Beginning in January 2008, the maximum casualty rate was 1.70% expressed as a percentage of the contributing participants’ taxable remuneration, while the temporary rate was 1.00%, retaining the monthly fixed premium of UF 2,150.
The aforementioned insurance contract also contemplates annual true-ups for the difference between all payments made by Provida (temporary premium and previous true-ups and the total cost of casualties (paid or accrued by the insurer), at the end of each year and which has been taking place on March 31 of each year from 2006 onwards. Also, on that date monthly financial revenues will be paid, based on the value recorded to December 31 of the previous year, resulting from applying the rate of return established in the contract over the surplus of cash flow maintained by the insurer (total payments made by Provida less casualties paid by the insurer).
On July 1, 2009, BBVA Seguros de Vida adopted General Rule N°243, allowing it to voluntarily determine the casualties’ reserves at a market interest rate on a monthly basis. Consequently and given the impact of such determination over the administration of the insurance contract and its associated risks, the parties, by common agreement, modified the conditions of the financial revenues. The above considering that providing the life and disability insurance implies a mismatch in the risk between the assets and liabilities generated by such obligation and, that the conditions of the contract could be modified by any of the parties if new regulations are enacted with requirements affecting the contract, as actually occurred.
The final settlement of this contract will occur 48 months after the expiration date of the coverage period, i.e. June 30, 2009, that is, June 30, 2013, but is extendable for up to 2 years by common agreement.
The previous insurance policy related to life and disability in force from August 1, 2003 to December 31, 2004 entered into with BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. Premiums had a maximum rate of 1.10% expressed as a percentage of the contributing participants’ taxable remuneration, with monthly premium paid throughout the contract’s duration at a temporary premium rate of 0.70%. Provida’s participation in the surplus was 100% if the casualty rate is equal to or lower than 1.10% and greater than 0.85% of the participants’ taxable remuneration. If the casualty rate was equal to or less than 0.85%, Provida had the right to an additional participation in 90% of the surplus. Additionally, the contract established monthly payments calculated at a provisional rate of 0.70% applied to the total of remuneration and monthly taxable income of the participants on a one-month lag plus a monthly fixed premium of UF 2,150 for the contract coverage period. The contract's annual true-ups took place on March 31 of each year beginning in 2005. The date of the final settlement of this contract was contemplated to occur on December 31, 2008, but was extended by common agreement of the parties, being finally paid in April 2011.
c. Effect on Profit (Loss)
The net effect on profit (loss) for the life and disability insurance includes the premium expenses presented under line item “Life and Disability Insurance Premium" and revenues from settlements for favorable casualty rate and monthly financial revenues that are presented under line items “Other revenues” within the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
The net composition of annual expense for life and disability insurance for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is detailed as follows:
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Life and disability insurance premiums annual expense | 329 | 370 | 649 | |||||||||
Favorable (unfavorable) adjustments due to casualty rate | (4,047 | ) | (2,696 | ) | 1,689 | |||||||
Life and disability insurance premium | (3,718 | ) | (2,326 | ) | 2,338 | |||||||
Financial income (Note 7 c.) | (953 | ) | (2,151 | ) | (7,126 | ) | ||||||
Total life and disability insurance expense, net | (4,671 | ) | (4,477 | ) | (4,788 | ) |
Since January 1, 2004, in relation to casualty adjustments, Provida has implemented its “casualty model” by evaluating actual data regarding claims and reserves according to the expected parameters such as discount rate, final amount of recognition bond, pension funds’ return, among others at the moment of the effective payments of casualties claims. In this regard, the accounting criterion establishes if the amount of casualty rate calculated by the model were less than the cost calculated and registered by the insurance company, by law, this last amount will be accrued according to the current regulation. On the contrary, if the casualty rate calculated by the model were higher than those established in the insurer’s balance, the amount to be provisioned would be the cost determined by the model.
It is important to note that BBVA Seguros de Vida adopted a new regulation effective on July 1, 2009, permitting the insurers to apply the market interest rate on a monthly basis to evaluate their casualties’ reserves for those life and disability contracts with a coverage period expiring before June 30, 2009. Consequently, this resulted in a decrease in the amount of reserves, since they were determined using historical rates that, according to law, would be the minimum rate from the prior semester, which were lower than those rates used for life and disability annuities prevailing in the market.
Likewise, on applying the methodology of its casualty model, Provida concluded that life and disability rates for annuities would be at lower average levels than the prevailing market interest rate as of June 2011, which is the interest rate used by the Insurer to value the reserves for casualties. However and due to a higher speed of payments of casualty claims has been recorded by using the casualty model, and the average forward rates applied are higher for the period than anticipated, and the rate used to pay such claims was lower than the rate provisioned, AFP Provida made a reversal of provisions determined by the difference between the amount required as of December 2011 and the effective amount, with the best available information, accrued by Provida as of December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2011 as the average forward rates at the close of December 2010 were lower than the expected forward rates for December 2011, Provida also made a reversal of provisions determined by the difference between the amount required as of December 2010 with the best available information as of December 31, 2011.
d. Liabilities arising from additional contributions
d.1 Collection to be cleared
Until 1987, the Company had collected additional contributions designated to finance the life and disability pension system fund. In this process, there were liabilities which amounted to MCh$301 and MCh$310 as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 respectively. These liabilities are recorded under “Collections to be cleared” within line item “Trade and other payables” (Note 22).
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
1) Pending additional contributions Contributions of workers not identified in the participants' master file or transferred to other Administrators, or deceased, or for which only the summary sheet has been received identifying the employer, or positive differences resulting from subtracting the balance from the contribution summaries. | 46 | 46 | ||||||
2) Additional contributions to be cleared Additional contributions and health insurance contributions of independent participants paid, for which the support sheets have not been received. | 255 | 264 | ||||||
Total | 301 | 310 |
The balance of pending contributions will be settled by the internal process of clearance or by transferring those to other pension fund administrators. Beginning on January 1, 1998, these contributions are paid directly into the Pension Fund.
d.2. Comparative analysis of pending additional contributions
As of December 31, | ||||||||
Pending Additional Contributions | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Beginning balance | 46 | 46 | ||||||
Leftovers from the year | - | - | ||||||
Cleared leftovers: | ||||||||
• For Provida | - | - | ||||||
• Sent to other AFPs | - | - | ||||||
Final Balance | 46 | 46 |
e. Accounts payable to insurance companies
The accounts payables to insurance companies presented within line item “Trade and other payables” were MCh$377 and MCh$380 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively.
f. Assets arising from life and disability insurance payments
Receivables from insurance companies and from the State reflect payments made by Provida on behalf of the insurer and the Government. The reimbursements are made within 30 days and are classified as short-term receivable, as shown below. Records of total payments to the participant must be maintained by the insurance company as well as Provida as stated by law. Additionally, the self-insured portion of the disability is administered by the insurance company according to the law. State reimbursements are guaranteed by law for employees who otherwise do not qualify for life and disability insurance.
f.1 Receivables from Insurance Companies
The balance of “Receivables from Insurance Companies”, under the item “Trade and Other Receivables”, as of December 31, 2012 and as of December 31, 2011, consisted of the following:
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Balance at end of previous year | 3,687 | 8,632 | ||||||
Life and disability pensions paid by the Company | 134,331 | 105,455 | ||||||
Reimbursements from the Insurance Company (less) | (134,707 | ) | (110,400 | ) | ||||
Insurance Company’s balance at end of year | 3,311 | 3,687 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
f.2 Receivables from the State
The balance of “Receivables from the State”, under the item “Trade and Other Receivables”, as of December 31, 2012 and as of December 31, 2011, consisted of the following:
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Balance at end of previous year | 192 | 195 | ||||||
• Pensions financed by state guarantee according to | ||||||||
Art. 73 of DL. N° 3,500 of 1980 | 104,370 | 83,405 | ||||||
• Payments financed for APS(*) financed by the Administrator | 113,213 | 79,193 | ||||||
• Payments financed by the Administrator | 15,634 | 17,551 | ||||||
• Reimbursement of State Guarantee | (104,710 | ) | (83,725 | ) | ||||
• Reimbursement of APS(*) | (113,010 | ) | (78,914 | ) | ||||
• Reimbursement of other payments | (13,878 | ) | (17,513 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of year | 1,811 | 192 |
(*) Solidarity Pension Contribution (‘APS’ in its Spanish acronym)
g. Provisions for higher casualty rate arising from life and disability insurance
Provisions for unfavorable casualty rate amounted to MCh$1,727 as of December 31, 2012 and MCh$5,780 as of December 31, 2011.
The provision made for a higher casualty rate is presented under the item “Provisions”.
Insurance Company | Period covered the Contract (MMYY-MMYY) | Costs for claims reported by the Insurance Company | Payments made to the Insurance Company (MCh$) | Provision at the date of information provided by the Insurance Company | Gross Provision at current year-end (not including financial revenues effects) (*) | ||
Date | MCh$ | To reported date | At 12-31-2012 | MCh$ | |||
BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. (**) | 08-2003 to 12-2004 | 04/30/2011 | 90,511 | 90,345 | 90,345 | - | - |
BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. (***) | 01-2005 to 06-2009 | 12/31/2012 | 370,642 | 371,068 | 371,068 | - | (1,727) |
Total | - | (1,727) |
(*) | BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. adopted General Rule N°243 effective beginning on July 1, 2009 allowing it to voluntarily determine the casualty reserve for those life and disability insurance contracts with coverage period before June 30, 2009, at a market interest rate on a monthly basis. Consequently, it resulted in a decreased amount of reserves as the reserves were determined at historical rates lower than the current ones. Likewise, by estimating that the market rates would be lower for the next three year than the rates at the effective dates to settle the obligation, Provida has made an additional accrual that explains the difference between the amount required by the insurer and the actual amount accrued by Provida. |
(**) | The casualty rate of the policy subscribed with BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. for August 2003 to December 2004 period was closed in April 2011. The casualty rate of such policy exceeded the maximum rate of 1.10%. Consequently the excess of costs for MCh$157 were assumed by such insurer. |
(***) | Includes accrued premiums for a total amount of MCh$493discounted from the balance payable to BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. according to the respective contracts. |
g.1 Reconciling costs and payments to the insurance companies
Figures in MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
N° contract | Cost of casualties insurance co. | Premium Paid | Premium Accrued | True- up | Total Payments to insurance co. | |||||||||||||||||
1 | 90,511 | 57,494 | - | 32,851 | 90,345 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | 370,642 | 266,427 | 493 | 104,148 | 371,068 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
g.2 Financial income provision
N° Contract | 2012 | 2011 | |
MCh$ | MCh$ | ||
1 | - | - | |
2 | 598 | 2,235 | |
Total | 598 | 2,235 |
h. Detail according to life and disability insurance contracts
Contract N° | Name of Insurance Company | Period covered by contract | Sub-period covered by contract |
1 | BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. | August 1, 2003 to December 31, 2004 | N/A |
2 | BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. | January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2009 | N/A |
i. Detail of disability insurance costs
Disability | ||||||||||||
Contract N° | Costs for casualties incurred by insurance company (January to December 2012) | Costs for casualties incurred by insurance company (January to December 2011) | ||||||||||
Temporary pensions | Additional contribution | Contributions | Temporary pensions | Additional contribution | Contributions | |||||||
N° | MCh$ | N° | MCh$ | N° | MCh$ | N° | MCh$ | N° | MCh$ | N° | MCh$ | |
1 | - | - | - | - | 52 | 681 | - | |||||
2 | 5,957 | 1,558 | 1,145 | 25,423 | 65 | 39 | 25,158 | 4,481 | 2,284 | 53,086 | 87 | 62 |
j. Detail of life insurance costs
Life | ||||||||||||
Contract N° | Costs for casualties incurred by insurance company (January to December 2012) | Costs for casualties incurred by insurance company (January to December 2011) | ||||||||||
Temporary pensions | Additional contribution | Contributions | Temporary pensions | Additional contribution | Contributions | |||||||
N° | MCh$ | N° | MCh$ | N° | MCh$ | N° | MCh$ | N° | MCh$ | N° | MCh$ | |
1 | - | - | - | - | 2 | 11 | - | |||||
2 | - | 37 | 234 | - | - | 104 | 1,025 | - |
k. Detail of financial income of life and disability insurance
Financial Revenue 2012 | Financial Revenue 2011 | |
Contract N° | MCh$ | MCh$ |
1 | - | 2 |
2 | 759 | 2,486 |
Total | 759 | 2,488 |
l. Detail of life and disability insurance adjustments
As of December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||
Date of calculation of adjustment | Contract N° | Adjustment Paid | Adjustment for pending payment of financial revenues | Accumulated Cost | Total Accumulated casualties | Accumulated fixed premium + temporary premium | Accumulated Financial revenues | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||
30-04-2012(*) | 1 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||
31-12-2012 | 2 | 104,148 | 642 | 358,852 | 370,642 | 269,079 | 20,367 | |||||||
(*) Contract ended in April 2011 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
Date of calculation of adjustment | Contract N° | Adjustment Paid | Adjustment for pending payment of financial revenues | Accumulated Cost | Total Accumulated casualties | Accumulated fixed premium + temporary premium | Accumulated Financial revenues | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||
30-04-2011 | 1 | 32,067 | - | 88,343 | 88,343 | 56,789 | 3,516 | |||||||
31-12-2011 | 2 | 101,655 | 2,462 | 323,661 | 361,701 | 262,331 | 19,159 |
NOTE 14. INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATES ACCOUNTED FOR USING THE EQUITY METHOD
14.1 Movements in investments in associates
The following tables set forth the changes in the equity of the Company’s equity method investments during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
As of December 31, 2012 |
Associate | Country | Functional Currency | Ownership interest % | Balance as of January 1, 2012 | Share of Profit (Loss) | Dividends | Exchange rate on translation | Transfer | Balance as of December 31, 2012 |
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||
Sociedad Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía Chile S.A. | Chile | Chilean Peso | 37.80% | 3,786 | 2,686 | - | - | (4,970) | 1,502 |
Inversiones DCV S.A. | Chile | Chilean Peso | 23.14% | 327 | 72 | (36) | - | - | 363 |
Servicios de Administración Previsional S.A. | Chile | Chilean Peso | 37.87% | 3,600 | 2,809 | (1,660) | - | (558) | 4,191 |
Afore Bancomer (1) | Mexico | Mexican Peso | 7.50% | 10,220 | 4,262 | (3,939) | 72 | (10,615) | - |
AFP Horizonte (1) | Peru | Peruvian Soles | 15.87% | 6,758 | 3,404 | (2,660) | (344) | (7,158) | - |
Total | 24,691 | 13,233 | (8,295) | (272) | (23,301) | 6,056 |
As of December 31, 2011 |
Associate | Country | Functional Currency | Ownership interest % | Balance as of January 1, 2011 | Share of Profit (Loss) | Dividends | Exchange rate on translation | Transfer | Balance as of December 31, 2011 |
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||
Sociedad Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía Chile S.A. | Chile | Chilean Peso | 37.80% | 2,369 | 1,299 | - | - | 118 | 3,786 |
Inversiones DCV S.A. | Chile | Chilean Peso | 23.14% | 282 | 83 | (38) | - | - | 327 |
Servicios de Administración Previsional S.A. | Chile | Chilean Peso | 37.87% | 3,054 | 2,343 | (1,328) | - | (469) | 3,600 |
Afore Bancomer (1) | Mexico | Mexican Peso | 7.50% | 9,239 | 3,802 | (2,836) | 15 | - | 10,220 |
AFP Horizonte (1) | Peru | Peruvian Soles | 15.87% | 6,365 | 2,184 | (2,967) | 1,176 | - | 6,758 |
Total | 21,309 | 9,711 | (7,169) | 1,191 | (351) | 24,691 |
(1) Provida exercise significant influence through BBVA Group participation on those companies.
Until November 30, 2012 the foreign associates AFORE Bancomer (Mexico) and AFP Horizonte (Peru) in which Provida Internacional owned 7.50% and a 15.87% stake respectively, were accounted for by using this method, so Provida indirectly exercised significant influence through the companies belonging to the BBVA Group.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of November 30, 2012 Provida Internacional reclassified as held for sale its investment held in Mexico, after the announcement of a sale intention where it was communicated that in the Extraordinary Shareholders’ meeting it was agreed to sell the total stake equivalent to 7.5% of the shares in the Mexican society AFORE Bancomer to Afore XXI Banorte, S.A. de C. V. (See Note 19 and Note 36).
As of November 30, 2012 Provida Internacional reclassified as held for sale its investment held in Peru, after the Board of Directors agreed at an extraordinary meeting of the Board of Directors held on December 5, 2012 to divest in AFP Horizonte, as a result of the proposal made by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (BBVA), a Spanish institution, and to purchase from Provida Internacional its stake in AFP Horizonte, being agreed in any case that this operation should be submitted to the approval of an Extraordinary Shareholder’s meeting upon the terms and conditions established in the Corporation Law. (See Note 19 and Note 36).
When an associate is classified as held for sale, the equity method does not apply, however it is accounted for in conformity to IFRS 5 “Non-current Assets held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.
All of our associates do not have published price quotations. There are no restrictions (e.g. resulting from borrowing arrangements or regulatory requirements) on the ability of associates to transfer funds to Provida in the form of cash dividends, or repayment of loans or advances.
Non-current assets classified as held for sale are measured at their lower carrying value and their fair value less costs associated with the sale.
For all periods presented no changes in ownership interest in our investment in associates have occurred.
14.2 Summarized total financial information of investments in associates
The following tables set forth summarized information of the investment in associates where Provida has significant influence, and for those non-current assets held for sale their underlying major classes of assets and liabilities including the aggregated amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and profit or loss as of December 31, 2012, and 2011:
As of December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Associate | Ownership interests % | Current assets | Non-current assets | Current liabilities | Non-current liabilities | Revenues | Expenses | Profit (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sociedad Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía Chile S.A. | 37.80 | % | 6,494 | 523 | 3,042 | 3,975 | 16,600 | (9,492 | ) | 7,108 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Inversiones DCV S.A. | 23.14 | % | 2 | 1,567 | 1 | 1,568 | 312 | (2 | ) | 310 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Servicios de Administración Previsional S.A. | 37.87 | % | 5,458 | 10,494 | 4,765 | 11,187 | 17,203 | (9,787 | ) | 7,416 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AFORE Bancomer | 7.50 | % | 184,503 | 1,634 | 44,597 | 141,540 | 114,651 | (57,815 | ) | 56,836 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AFP Horizonte | 15.87 | % | 25,540 | 44,262 | 24,710 | 45,092 | 41,791 | (20,346 | ) | 21,445 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 221,997 | 58,480 | 77,115 | 203,362 | 190,557 | (97,442 | ) | 93,115 |
As of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Associate | Ownership interests % | Current assets | Non-current assets | Current liabilities | Non-current liabilities | Revenues | Expenses | Profit (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sociedad Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía Chile S.A. | 37.80 | % | 12,233 | 1,291 | 2,038 | 11,486 | 12,470 | (9,034 | ) | 3,436 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Inversiones DCV S.A. | 23.14 | % | 58 | 1,357 | 1 | 1,415 | 361 | (2 | ) | 359 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Servicios de Administración Previsional S.A. | 37.87 | % | 6,924 | 8,714 | 6,073 | 9,563 | 14,936 | (8,749 | ) | 6,187 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AFORE Bancomer | 7.50 | % | 175,491 | 1,367 | 40,594 | 136,264 | 119,839 | (69,140 | ) | 50,699 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AFP Horizonte | 15.87 | % | 18,595 | 41,509 | 17,529 | 42,575 | 47,137 | (33,378 | ) | 13,759 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 213,301 | 54,238 | 66,235 | 201,303 | 194,743 | (120,303 | ) | 74,440 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
15.1 Capital management
The constant objective of AFP Provida has been the efficient management of its working capital, maintaining significant and enough cash flows in order to fulfill its obligations.
The main use of the Company’s funds are the operating expenses related to the remunerations paid to the personnel, additional constitution of mandatory investments, dividend payments and other administration expenses. Provida has financed these requirements with cash flows generated from its operations, as well as, short-term debt.
The Administration considers that these sources of funds have been enough to finance the capital requirements and the payments of its obligations. Due to the nature of the business, Provida has significant cash flows stemming from fees received from mandatory and voluntary pension savings that are expected to perform similarly to previous years. Likewise, the Administration estimates that the expected growth in the Company’s client portfolio will continue increasing its working capital requirements, a situation where Provida is well positioned to finance its requirements.
In terms of regulation regarding capital matters, the Pension Funds Administrators must maintain a net minimum shareholder’s equity measured in UF, which is directly related to the number of participants that the AFPs have at the date of the financial statements. AFP Provida is in the upper trace due to maintaining a number exceeding 10,000 participants, which obligates Provida to maintain a minimum shareholders’ equity of UF 20,000. Since the Company was established, it has been in compliance with such obligation, and as of December 31, 2012 its shareholders’ equity amounts to UF 11,805,767.
15.2 Financial instruments classified by nature and category
a) The detail of financial assets, classified by nature and category as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
As of December 31 | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss: | ||||||||
Mandatory investments (See Note 4 g.7. and Note 6) | 217,072 | 201,418 | ||||||
Financial assets(*) | 15,143 | 14,322 | ||||||
BBVA Mutual Fund (Money Market) | 357 | - | ||||||
Financial assets AFP Génesis Ecuador | 4,805 | 5,698 |
(*) Term deposits with maturity of more than one year, which are designated at fair value.
b) The detail of financial liabilities, classified by nature and category as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Amortized cost: | ||||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | 299 | 354 |
15.3 Fair value of financial instruments
Management considers that the carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities recognized at amortized cost in the consolidated financial statements, approximates their fair value.
Below is comparison between the value at which financial assets and liabilities are recorded and their fair value as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Amount recorded | Fair value | Amount recorded | Fair value | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss: | ||||||||||||||||
Mandatory investments (See Note 4 g.7. and Note 6) | 217,072 | 217,072 | 201,418 | 201,418 | ||||||||||||
Financial assets(*) | 15,143 | 15,143 | 14,322 | 14,322 | ||||||||||||
BBVA Mutual Fund (Money Market) | 357 | 357 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Financial assets AFP Génesis Ecuador | 4,805 | 4,805 | 5,698 | 5,698 | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | 299 | 299 | 354 | 354 |
(*) Term deposits with maturity of more than one year, which are designated at fair value.
15.4 Fair value measurement
The following table provides an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value, grouped into Levels 1 to 3 based on the degree to which the fair value is observable.
Level 1 – fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices).
Level 3 – fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
As of December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Mandatory investments | 217,072 | - | - | 217,072 | ||||||||||||
Financial assets(*) | 15,500 | - | - | 15,500 | ||||||||||||
Financial assets - AFP Genesis | 4,805 | - | - | 4,805 |
As of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Mandatory investments | 201,418 | - | - | 201,418 | ||||||||||||
Financial assets(*) | 14,322 | - | - | 14,322 | ||||||||||||
Financial assets - AFP Genesis | 5,698 | - | - | 5,698 |
(*) Term deposits with maturity of more than one year.
The Pension Law establishes that each AFP must maintain a reserve for mandatory investment equal to 1% of the net asset value of each pension fund under management. The mandatory investment that the administrator needs to maintain for the period between the second business day of the month in which the calculation is made and the first day of the next month after the calculation was made will be equivalent to 1% of the total of shares that represent the net asset value of each pension fund of the last day of the preceding month of the calculation date of the mandatory investment reserve. Therefore, the mandatory investment will increase or decrease on a monthly basis based on the calculation explained above. The investment in mandatory investment in each type of pension fund is valued on a daily basis, multiplying the number of fund shares invested in each type of fund by the value of the share on that day.
The Superintendency of Pensions publishes daily quotations of pension funds net asset value (NAV) at which redemptions or purchases of shares (units) occur without any adjustments to the published NAV. Redemptions and unit purchases take place regularly, between the participants that changes between funds and participants that changes between AFPs.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Based on paragraph AG71 of IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement which states that a financial instrument is regarded as quoted in an active market “if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm's length basis. Fair value is defined in terms of a price agreed by a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm's length transaction”; and paragraph AG77 which states that the “initial acquisition or origination of a financial asset or incurrence of a financial liability is a market transaction that provides a foundation for estimating the fair value of the financial instrument”. Management has determined that the issuance and redemptions of the units in a fund represent market transactions occurring on an arm's length basis.
Based on the above explanation and IFRS 7 paragraph 27A(a) which describes Level 1 classification as relating to “quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities” we believe that mandatory investments comply with the definition to be classified as Level 1
NOTE 16. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, Plant and Equipment as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Classes of Property, Plant and Equipment: | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||
Construction in progress | 734 | 111 | ||||||
Land | 5,081 | 5,804 | ||||||
Buildings | 15,212 | 15,789 | ||||||
Plant and equipment | 539 | 676 | ||||||
IT Equipment | 1,532 | 1,672 | ||||||
Fixtures and fittings | 2,149 | 2,131 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements | 694 | 1,140 | ||||||
Other Property, plant and equipment | 442 | 464 | ||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net | 26,383 | 27,787 |
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Classes of Property, Plant and Equipment: | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||
Construction in progress | 734 | 111 | ||||||
Land | 5,081 | 5,804 | ||||||
Buildings | 20,431 | 21,559 | ||||||
Plant and equipment | 1,123 | 1,226 | ||||||
IT Equipment | 3,096 | 3,121 | ||||||
Fixtures and fittings | 5,689 | 5,704 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements | 1,576 | 1,787 | ||||||
Other Property, plant and equipment | 788 | 852 | ||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross | 38,518 | 40,164 |
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Classes of Property, Plant and Equipment: | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||
Construction in progress | - | - | ||||||
Land | - | - | ||||||
Buildings | (5,219 | ) | (5,770 | ) | ||||
Plant and equipment | (584 | ) | (550 | ) | ||||
IT Equipment | (1,564 | ) | (1,449 | ) | ||||
Fixtures and fittings | (3,540 | ) | (3,573 | ) | ||||
Leasehold improvements | (882 | ) | (647 | ) | ||||
Other Property, plant and equipment | (346 | ) | (388 | ) | ||||
Accumulated depreciation and impairment of Property, Plant and Equipment | (12,135 | ) | (12,377 | ) |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For all periods presented, there are no items of property, plant and equipment pledged as security for liabilities.
The reconciliation of the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is as follows:
As of December 31, 2012: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Movements | Construction in progress | Land | Buildings | Plant and equipment | IT Equipment | Fixtures & Fittings | Leasehold improvements | Other PP&E | Property, Plant and Equipment, net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2012 | 111 | 5,804 | 15,789 | 676 | 1,672 | 2,131 | 1,140 | 464 | 27,787 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Movements: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions | 3,611 | - | 1 | 66 | 606 | 93 | 99 | 4 | 4,479 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disposals | - | (782 | ) | (2,367 | ) | (2 | ) | - | (95 | ) | - | (1 | ) | (3,247 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense | - | - | (311 | ) | (192 | ) | (753 | ) | (601 | ) | (541 | ) | (37 | ) | (2,435 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss recognized in profit or loss | - | - | (315 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | (315 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other increases (decreases) | (2,988 | ) | 59 | 2,415 | (9 | ) | 7 | 621 | (4 | ) | 12 | 114 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total movements | 623 | (723 | ) | (577 | ) | (137 | ) | (140 | ) | 18 | (446 | ) | (22 | ) | (1,404 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance as of December 31, 2012 | 734 | 5,081 | 15,212 | 539 | 1,532 | 2,149 | 694 | 442 | 26,383 |
As of December 31, 2011: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Movements | Construction in progress | Land | Buildings | Plant and equipment | IT Equipment | Fixtures & Fittings | Leasehold improvements | Other PP&E | Property, Plant and Equipment, net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2011 | 404 | 6,017 | 15,470 | 876 | 1,537 | 2,394 | 1,458 | 504 | 28,660 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Movements: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions | 2,380 | - | 6 | 43 | 955 | 241 | 43 | 1 | 3,669 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disposals | - | (213 | ) | (675 | ) | (23 | ) | - | - | - | - | (911 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense | - | - | (322 | ) | (228 | ) | (813 | ) | (586 | ) | (361 | ) | (42 | ) | (2,352 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss recognized in profit or loss | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other increases (decreases) | (2,673 | ) | - | 1,310 | 8 | (7 | ) | 82 | - | 1 | (1,279 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total movements | (293 | ) | (213 | ) | 319 | (200 | ) | 135 | (263 | ) | (318 | ) | (40 | ) | (873 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance as of December 31, 2011 | 111 | 5,804 | 15,789 | 676 | 1,672 | 2,131 | 1,140 | 464 | 27,787 |
NOTE 17. INTANGIBLE ASSETS OTHER THAN GOODWILL
Intangible assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the following amounts:
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Classes of Intangible assets | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||
IT Software | 3,916 | 3,642 | ||||||
Other identifiable intangible assets (*) | 31,033 | 36,196 | ||||||
Intangibles assets, net | 34,949 | 39,838 |
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Classes of Intangible assets | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||
IT Software | 6,298 | 4,944 | ||||||
Other identifiable intangible assets (*) | 51,551 | 51,553 | ||||||
Intangibles assets, gross | 57,849 | 56,497 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Classes of Intangible assets | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||
IT Software | (2,382 | ) | (1,302 | ) | ||||
Other identifiable intangible assets (*) | (20,518 | ) | (15,357 | ) | ||||
Accumulated depreciation and impairment of intangible assets | (22,900 | ) | (16,659 | ) |
(*) Correspond to Customers List (see Note 4. i.3)
The reconciliation of carrying amounts of intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
As of December 31, 2012: | IT Software | Other identifiable intangible assets(*) | Intangibles assets, net | |||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2012 | 3,642 | 36,196 | 39,838 | |||||||||
Movements: | ||||||||||||
Additions | 1,352 | - | 1,352 | |||||||||
Disposals | - | - | - | |||||||||
Amortization expense | (1,078 | ) | (5,163 | ) | (6,241 | ) | ||||||
Impairment loss recognized in profit or loss | - | - | - | |||||||||
Other increases (decreases) | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total movements | 274 | (5,163 | ) | (4,889 | ) | |||||||
Ending balance as of December 31, 2012 | 3,916 | 31,033 | 34,949 |
As of December 31, 2011: | IT Software | Other identifiable intangible assets(*) | Intangibles assets, net | |||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2011 | 2,968 | 41,357 | 44,325 | |||||||||
Movements: | ||||||||||||
Additions | 1,585 | - | 1,585 | |||||||||
Disposals | - | - | - | |||||||||
Amortization expense | (692 | ) | (5,161 | ) | (5,853 | ) | ||||||
Impairment loss recognized in profit or loss | - | - | - | |||||||||
Other increases (decreases) | (219 | ) | - | (219 | ) | |||||||
Total movements | 674 | (5,161 | ) | (4,487 | ) | |||||||
Ending balance as of December 31, 2011 | 3,642 | 36,196 | 39,838 |
(*) Correspond to Customers List (see Note 4. i.3)
NOTE 18. GOODWILL
The following tables set forth goodwill by company as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
Company | Balance as of January 1, 2012 | Additions | Impairment | Transfer | Balance as of December 31,2012 | |||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||
AFORE Bancomer-Mexico | 8,460 | - | - | (8,460 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
AFP Génesis-Ecuador | 273 | - | - | - | 273 | |||||||||||||||
AFP Horizonte-Peru | 197 | - | - | (197 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
Total | 8,930 | - | - | (8,657 | ) | 273 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Company | Balance as of January 1, 2011 | Additions | Impairment | Transfer | Balance as of December 31,2011 | |||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||
AFORE Bancomer-Mexico | 8,460 | - | - | - | 8,460 | |||||||||||||||
AFP Génesis-Ecuador | 273 | - | - | - | 273 | |||||||||||||||
AFP Horizonte-Peru | 197 | - | - | - | 197 | |||||||||||||||
Total | 8,930 | - | - | - | 8,930 |
For all periods presented there are no indications of an impairment loss.
On November 30, 2012 the Company reclassified the Goodwill of AFORE Bancomer in Mexico and AFP Horizonte in Peru as held for sale. (See Note 19 and Note 36)
NOTE 19. NON-CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
The following table lists the reclassified items as non-current assets held for sale:
As of December 31, 2012 | ||||
MCh$ | ||||
AFORE Bancomer (Mexico) | 10,616 | |||
Goodwill – AFORE Bancomer | 8,460 | |||
Total AFORE Bancomer (Mexico) | 19,076 | |||
AFP Horizonte (Peru) | 7,158 | |||
Goodwill – AFP Horizonte | 197 | |||
Total AFP Horizonte (Peru) | 7,355 | |||
Total of non-current assets held for sale | 26,431 |
No impairment losses have been recognized when reclassifying the investments of such associates as held for sale.
NOTE 20. OTHER CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Other current and non-current assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Non-Current | Current | Non-Current | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Deferred interests for leasing | 22 | 66 | 25 | 76 | ||||||||||||
Other | 10 | - | 6 | - | ||||||||||||
Total Other Assets | 32 | 66 | 31 | 76 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 21. INTEREST-BEARING BORROWINGS
Interest-bearing borrowings as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
As of December, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Non-Current | Current | Non-Current | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Leasing obligations | 64 | 299 | 63 | 354 | ||||||||||||
Banco de Chile | 1 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Banco BBH (Brown Brothers Harriman) | 2 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total | 67 | 299 | 63 | 354 |
NOTE 22. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
The balance of this account as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is presented as follows:
As of December, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Non-Current | Current | Non-Current | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Minimum Dividend | 10,232 | - | 8,044 | - | ||||||||||||
Withholdings from pensioners (1) | 3,740 | - | 3,608 | - | ||||||||||||
Pensions payable (2) | 1,967 | - | 889 | - | ||||||||||||
Accounts Payable to the National Health Fund (3) | 548 | - | 532 | - | ||||||||||||
Trade payables | 4,064 | - | 4,811 | - | ||||||||||||
Collection to be cleared (Note 13 d.1) | 301 | - | 311 | - | ||||||||||||
Other accounts payable | 2,798 | - | 2,262 | - | ||||||||||||
Total Trade and Other Accounts Payable | 23,650 | - | 20,457 | - |
(1) | Withholdings from pensioners as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows: |
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Balance at previous year's end | 3,546 | 3,351 | ||||||
Withholding health contributions from pensioners in the period | 45,371 | 42,468 | ||||||
Withdrawals from National Health Fund in the period | (21,619 | ) | (19,734 | ) | ||||
Withdrawals from Health Care Institutions in the period | (5,420 | ) | (5,269 | ) | ||||
Withdrawals from compensation fund (CCAF) and others in the period | (18,199 | ) | (17,270 | ) | ||||
Subtotal | 3,679 | 3,546 | ||||||
Single tax withholdings from pensioners | 61 | 62 | ||||||
Total | 3,740 | 3,608 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(2) | Pensions payables as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows: |
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
Uncollected accrued pensions | 1,380 | 714 | ||||||
Other | 587 | 175 | ||||||
Total | 1,967 | 889 |
(3) Accounts Payable to the National Health Fund: In conformity with the requirements in D.L. 3,500, the Administrator must collect the independent participants’ health contributions and deduct health contributions from pensions financed by the Pension Fund and transfer these amounts to the Fondo Nacional de Salud (‘National Health Fund”) or the corresponding health insurance institution. Accordingly, balances in this item represent contributions collected that must be transferred to the National Health Fund or the respective health insurance institution. The detail for all periods presented is as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||
a) Independent Contributors: | ||||||||
Balance at previous year's end | 533 | 523 | ||||||
Collection of health contributions in the year | 6,893 | 6,336 | ||||||
Withdrawals from National Health Fund in the year | (6,878 | ) | (6,326 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of year | 548 | 533 | ||||||
b) Pensioners: | ||||||||
Balance at previous year's end | 3,546 | 3,351 | ||||||
Collection of health contributions from pensioners in the year | 45,371 | 42,468 | ||||||
Withdrawals from National Health Fund in the year | (21,619 | ) | (19,734 | ) | ||||
Withdrawals from Health Care Institutions (Isapres) in the year | (5,420 | ) | (5,269 | ) | ||||
Withdrawals from compensation fund (CCAF) and Others in the period | (18,199 | ) | (17,270 | ) | ||||
Subtotal contributions of Pensioners (*) | 3,679 | 3,546 |
(*) Note: These amounts are part of withholdings from pensioners.
NOTE 23. PROVISIONS
The detail of provisions as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Non-Current | Current | Non-Current | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Provision for employee benefits (1) | 4,851 | - | 4,915 | - | ||||||||||||
Provision for unfavorable casualty rate (2) | 1,727 | - | 5,780 | - | ||||||||||||
Other Provisions (3) | 3,836 | - | 3,459 | - | ||||||||||||
Total Provisions | 10,414 | - | 14,154 | - |
(1) | For a description of the provision for employee benefits, see Note 4.m.2. |
(2) | For a description of the provision for unfavorable casualty rate, see Note 4.m.1. |
(3) | Other provisions include mainly provisions for advertising and provision for litigations related to pending labor lawsuits with former employees and other pension matters. See Note 32.d for additional information. It includes MCh$1,594 corresponding to the estimation of return to be financed corresponding to delayed additional contributions replenished in the participants’ accounts made by the Company in the Pension Funds as per Pension Supertintendency’s instructions. |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Movements in provisions as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
Balance as of January 1, 2012 | Additional Provisions | Provisions Used | Unused provisions reversed | Other Increases (Decreases) | Balance as of December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||||||||
Provisions for employee benefits | 4,915 | 2,994 | (3,058 | ) | - | - | 4,851 | |||||||||||||||||
Provisions for unfavorable casualty rate (Net of financial income) | 5,780 | - | - | (4,053 | ) | - | 1,727 | |||||||||||||||||
Other Provisions | 3,459 | 2,027 | (1.504 | ) | (146 | ) | - | 3,837 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | 14,154 | 5,021 | (4,562 | ) | (4,199 | ) | - | 10,414 |
Balance as of January 1, 2011 | Additional Provisions | Provisions Used | Unused provisions reversed | Other Increases (Decreases) | Balance as of December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||||||||
Provisions for employee benefits | 4,262 | 2,986 | (2,333 | ) | - | - | 4,915 | |||||||||||||||||
Provisions for unfavorable casualty rate (Net of financial income) | 8,835 | - | - | (3,055 | ) | - | 5,780 | |||||||||||||||||
Other Provisions | 4,015 | 804 | (743 | ) | (617 | ) | - | 3,459 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | 17,112 | 3,790 | (3,076 | ) | (3,672 | ) | - | 14,154 |
NOTE 24. OTHER CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
The amount held by the Administrator under the item Other Liabilities as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, includes the following concepts:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Non-Current | Current | Non-Current | |||||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | |||||||||||||
Legal costs collected | 52 | - | 26 | - | ||||||||||||
Provision for BHC (ex Unión) pension responsibility | - | 638 | - | 649 | ||||||||||||
Guarantees received for rental of own offices | - | 175 | - | 178 | ||||||||||||
Other liabilities | - | - | 255 | - | ||||||||||||
Total Other Liabilities | 52 | 813 | 281 | 827 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 25. ISSUED CAPITAL
25.1 Major shareholders
As of December 31, 2012 | ||
Name of 12 major shareholders | Equity Share | Number of shares |
BBVA Inversiones Chile S. A. | 51.62% | 171,023,573 |
The Bank of New York Mellon | 25.08% | 83,107,305 |
Penta Corredores de Bolsa S. A. | 3.47% | 11,498,276 |
Larraín Vial Corredores de Bolsa S.A. | 2.68% | 8,880,723 |
Banco de Chile por cuenta de Terceros | 1.71% | 5,665,082 |
Banchile Corredores de Bolsa S. A. | 1.39% | 4,604,293 |
Inmobiliaria Duero Ltda. | 1.02% | 3,388,636 |
Banco Itaú por cuenta de Inversionistas | 0.87% | 2,882,516 |
Banco Santander por cuenta de Extranjeros | 0.67% | 2,210,118 |
Bolsa de Comercio de Santiago -Bolsa de Valores | 0.50% | 1,639,411 |
Bolsa Eléctronica de Chile - Bolsa de Valores | 0.44% | 1,462,589 |
Santander S.A. Corredora de Bolsa | 0.42% | 1,373,314 |
Other | 10.14% | 33,580,787 |
Total | 100.00% | 331,316,623 |
25.2 Issued capital
The issued capital as of December 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 is represented by 331,316,623 authorized, subscribed in and no par value common shares.
25.3 Accumulated of other comprehensive income
Other reserves within Equity as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
Balance as of January 1, 2012 | Movements 2012 | Balance as of December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Exchange difference on translation (1) | (2,638 | ) | (529 | ) | (3,167 | ) | ||||||
AFP Horizonte – Peru (*) | (989 | ) | (344 | ) | (1,333 | ) | ||||||
AFP Génesis - Ecuador | (281 | ) | (256 | ) | (537 | ) | ||||||
AFORE Bancomer – Mexico (*) | (1,368 | ) | 71 | (1,297 | ) | |||||||
Miscellaneous other reserves (2) | (2,690 | ) | (65 | ) | 2,625 | |||||||
IFRS Adjustment AFC Chile | 184 | (65 | ) | 119 | ||||||||
IFRS Adjustment DCV | 43 | - | 43 | |||||||||
Price-level restatement issued capital | 2,463 | - | 2,463 | |||||||||
Total | 51 | (594 | ) | (543 | ) |
(*) Amounts recognized in other accumulative comprehensive income and in equity for non-current assets available for sale. The balance included translation differences of the associate AFORE Bancomer in Mexico of MCh$1,297 and translation differences of the associate AFP Horizonte in Peru of MCh$1,333. At the moment of the sale, these amounts will be reversed.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Balance as of January 1, 2011 | Movements 2011 | Balance as of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Exchange difference on translation (1) | (4,012 | ) | 1,374 | (2,638 | ) | |||||||
AFP Horizonte - Peru | (2,166 | ) | 1,177 | (989 | ) | |||||||
AFP Génesis - Ecuador | (463 | ) | 182 | (281 | ) | |||||||
AFORE Bancomer - Mexico | (1,383 | ) | 15 | (1,368 | ) | |||||||
Miscellaneous other reserves (2) | 2,606 | 84 | 2,690 | |||||||||
IFRS Adjustment AFC Chile | 100 | 84 | 184 | |||||||||
IFRS Adjustment DCV | 43 | - | 43 | |||||||||
Price-level restatement issued capital | 2,463 | - | 2,463 | |||||||||
Total | (1,406 | ) | 1,458 | 51 |
(1) Exchange difference on translation:
Reserve for exchange difference on translation is used to record the difference arising from translating the financial statements of our foreign operations from their functional currencies to our presentation currency; and translation of goodwill arising from the acquisition of foreign operations with a functional currency other than the Chilean peso.
(2) Miscellaneous other reserves
Other miscellaneous other reserves include the following:
a) | On December 31, 2009 issued capital balance includes price-level restatement adjustments that were not reversed when we adopted IFRS in 2009. We have elected not reverse to such price-level restatement adjustments based on Circular N°456 issued by the Superintendency of Securities and Insurances which indicates that deflation impacts shall not be applied to issued capital accounts as issued capital at the transition period to IFRS is established in the company’s bylaws, which have been modified based on the distribution of the revalued equity, held at the annual shareholder’s meeting that approves such amount according to Article 10, section 2 of Chile Law N°18.046 Sociedades Anónimas. |
b) | Share of miscellaneous other reserves of associates accounted for using equity method. |
25.4 Dividends
According to Company by-laws, unless a different agreement is adopted in the General Shareholders’ meeting with a unanimous vote of subscribed and outstanding shares, Provida must distribute dividends in cash for an amount at least equivalent to 30% of net earnings per year (legal minimum for public corporations). With regard to dividend payments, the Board of Directors agreed to pay an interim dividend in the month of October and the final dividend after the General Shareholders’ meeting of the following year, for an amount equal to 100% of net profit.
In the Board of Directors’ meeting held on September 26, 2012, the payment of an interim dividend was approved for the amount of Ch$100.00 per share, charged to profits of the year 2012, equivalent to MCh$33,132 which was paid on October 30, 2012.
On May 31, 2012, a final total dividend was paid for the amount of Ch$238.00 per share, charged to profits of the year 2011, equivalent to MCh$78,855.
On October 28, 2011, an interim dividend was paid for the amount of Ch$61.87 per share, charged to profits of the year 2011, equivalent to MCh$20,499.
On May 27, 2011, a final total dividend was paid for the amount of Ch$207.40 per share, charged to profits of the year 2010, equivalent to MCh$68,715.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On October 29, 2010, an interim dividend was paid for the amount of Ch$60.37 per share, charged to profits of the year 2010, equivalent to MCh$20,002.
Minimum dividends
Regarding dividends payments, the Board of Directors has agreed to pay an interim dividend in October of each year and a final dividend after the Annual General Shareholders’ meeting to be held in the following year, for a total amount equal to 100% of the profit for the year dependent on the fulfillment of the forecasted results, cash flow requirements to finance mandatory investments and development of the company and the final profit for the year.
The policy on dividends includes the constitution of an obligation, which will be accrued at the end of each reporting period, when the amount of interim dividends paid against profit for the year is less than the minimum dividend established in the dividend policy agreed on during the General Shareholders’ meeting. The shortfall will be accrued as a dividend payable.
As of December 31, 2012, the charge in retained earnings for minimum dividends amounted to MCh$10,189 corresponding to the provision for minimum dividends for the year 2012 for MCh$33,132 minus the reversal of interim dividends paid in year 2011 for an amount of MCh$22,943.
As of December 31, 2011, the charge in retained earnings for minimum dividends amounted to MCh$7,800 corresponding to the provision for minimum dividends for the year 2011 for MCh$28,279 minus the reversal of interim dividends paid in year 2011 for an amount of MCh$20,499.
As of December 31, 2010, the charge in retained earnings for minimum dividends amounted to MCh$7,486 corresponding to the provision for minimum dividends for the year 2010 for MCh$27,487 minus the reversal of interim dividends paid in year 2010 for an amount of MCh$20,002.
Retained earnings as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, amounted to MCh$210,922, MCh$199,965 and MCh$190,637 respectively net of minimum dividends.
NOTE 26. SERVICE CONTRACTS
Provida has entered into service agreement with different companies to complement management, operation and sale operations in its line of business. The relevant aspects of these contracts are indicated below:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
a. Collection services contracts | ||||||||||||
Costs charged to the “Administrative expenses” account | ||||||||||||
in the Statements of Income | ||||||||||||
a.1) Banco del Estado de Chile | ||||||||||||
Line of business: Banking activities | ||||||||||||
Cost of Service (VAT included) | ||||||||||||
from 1 to 2,000 forms UF 0.054 | ||||||||||||
from 2,001 to 4,000 forms UF 0.048 | ||||||||||||
from 4,001 to 7,000 forms UF 0.042 | ||||||||||||
from 7,001 forms and more UF 0,036 | ||||||||||||
Cost charged to profits (net) | 99 | 113 | 130 | |||||||||
a.2) Banco Santander | ||||||||||||
Line of business: Banking activities | ||||||||||||
Cost of service (VAT included): UF 0.023 per form | ||||||||||||
Cost charged to income (net): | 31 | 43 | 41 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
a.3) Banco de Chile | ||||||||||||
Line of business: Banking activities | ||||||||||||
Cost of service (VAT included) (*): UF 0.031 per form | ||||||||||||
Cost charged to income | - | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
(*) The bank only provides this collection service in its Puerto Williams Office | ||||||||||||
a.4) BBVA Chile | ||||||||||||
Line of business: Banking activities | ||||||||||||
Cost of service (VAT included): UF 0.024 per form | ||||||||||||
Cost charged to income | - | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
a.5) Caja de Compensación Los Andes | ||||||||||||
Line of business: Compensation Administrator | ||||||||||||
Cost of service: Ch$ 134.15 per form and Ch$ 24.09 per line, readjustable every 6 months | ||||||||||||
Cost charged to income | 527 | 541 | 639 | |||||||||
a.6) Caja de Compensación La Araucana | ||||||||||||
Line of business: Compensation Administrator | ||||||||||||
Cost of service: Ch$ 133.04 per form and Ch$ 23.91 per line, readjustable every 6 months | ||||||||||||
Cost charged to income | 31 | 32 | 30 |
a.7) Servicios de Administración Previsional | ||||||||||||
Line of business: Collection services of pension contributions through internet | ||||||||||||
Cost of service (VAT included): | ||||||||||||
Full Internet | ||||||||||||
from 1 to 9,999 Ch$ 201.56 per form | ||||||||||||
from 10,000 to 24,999 Ch$ 165.99 per form | ||||||||||||
from 25,000 to 49,999 Ch$ 142.29 per form | ||||||||||||
and per line of detail Ch$ 36.25 | ||||||||||||
Mixed | ||||||||||||
from 1 to 9,999 Ch$ 165.98 per form | ||||||||||||
from 10,000 to 24,999 Ch$ 139.69 per form | ||||||||||||
from 25,000 to 49,999 Ch$ 119.75 per form | ||||||||||||
and per line of detail Ch$ 33.56 | ||||||||||||
from 1-1 lines Ch$ 438.47 | ||||||||||||
from 2-5 lines Ch$ 350.76 | ||||||||||||
from 6-9 lines Ch$ 306.91 | ||||||||||||
10 lines and more Ch$ 0 | ||||||||||||
Declaration of Forms (DNP) | ||||||||||||
Full Ch$ 47.43 | ||||||||||||
Mixed Ch$ 104.77 | ||||||||||||
Cost charged to income | 1,619 | 1,633 | 1,515 | |||||||||
a.8) Caja de Compensación 18 de Septiembre | ||||||||||||
Line of business: Compensation Fund | ||||||||||||
Cost of service: Ch$ 115.92 per form and Ch$ 20.84 per line, readjustable every 6 months | ||||||||||||
Cost charged to income | 2 | 2 | 2 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
b. Custody of securities | ||||||||||||
Safe custody of securities and financial instruments of Provida Pension Funds and Mandatory Investments | ||||||||||||
b.1) Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. | ||||||||||||
Line of business: Banking | ||||||||||||
Type of service provided: Custody | ||||||||||||
Cost charged to income | 516 | 589 | 553 | |||||||||
b.2) Depósito Central de Valores S.A. | ||||||||||||
Type of service provided: Custody | ||||||||||||
Line of business: Safe custody of securities | ||||||||||||
Cost charged to income | 729 | 681 | 608 |
c) Expenses for stock market transactions
The following expenses were incurred for stock market transactions during the period 2012, 2011 and 2010, included in the account “Administration Expenses”
Stock Exchange of Santiago, stock Market:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Variable Commission (transactions) | 416 | 397 | 298 | |||||||||
Fixed Costs (Use of Terminals) | 98 | 102 | 216 | |||||||||
Balance at end of period | 514 | 499 | 514 | |||||||||
Stock Exchange of Santiago; Stock market Line of Business: Brokerage Amount owed : MCh$NIL Payment : Cash |
:
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
d) Administration services and equipment maintenance
Provida has signed administration and maintenance equipment services contracts. The main services contracts are as follows:
d.1) Entel, Telefónica Móviles and Telefónica Chile:
Telecommunications services have been contracted with these companies. The contract contemplates services for long distance allowing signals transportation and the corresponding lines and equipments to provide such services. The costs of these services included in "data processing expenses" and "administrative expenses" amounted to MCh$102, MCh$124 and MCh$159 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
d.2) Tata Consultancy Services BPO Chile S.A.
This company provides the following services
Microfilm services and administration of archive and reception departments
This contract includes microfilming services of documents and the administration to the reception office and the archive unit. The costs incurred for these services are included in "administrative expenses" and amounted to MCh$764, MCh$405 and MCh$331 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Design and management of centralized database
This contract includes the management and safekeeping of the database regarding participants’ contributions that have transferred to AFPs since 1981. Provida accesses and manages this database through centralized query. The agreement was signed on March 1, 2000. The costs for these services are included in “administrative expenses” and amounted to MCh$0, MCh$42 and MCh$91 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Agreement for supplying digital forms
This agreement includes the implementation of an information capture process for participant contribution forms and other documents related to the Administrator’s operations, using digital imaging technology in general forms. The costs for these services are included in “administrative expenses” and amounted to MCh$9, MCh$20 and MCh$57 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
d.3) Agreement of rental and maintenance of equipments
Coasin Chile Ltda.
Contracts of equipment maintenance. The costs of these services are included in “administrative expenses” and amounted to MCh$50, MCh$122 and MCh$190 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Nielsoft Informática Ltda.
Contracts of system maintenance. The costs of these services are included in “administrative expenses” and amounted to MCh$635, MCh$523 and MCh$313, as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
d.4) Jordata Ltda.
This agreement considers the information capture process for participant contribution forms and other documents related to the Administrator’s operations. The costs for these services are included in “administrative expenses” and amounted to MCh$0, MCh$5 and MCh$20 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
d.5) Pensions and savings payments
Contract entered into with BBVA Chile S.A
Providing services of pension payments and saving withdrawals through a contract entered into with BBVA Chile S.A. on February 1, 2003. The related costs correspond to UF 0.044 (VAT included) for transactions between 0 and 25,000 for savings payments, and UF 0.031 (VAT included) for transactions beyond 25,000 for pension payments. The amounts accounted for as "administrative expenses" were MCh$223, MCh$170 and MCh$319 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Contract entered into with Servipag
Service to pay pensions with Servipag; Contract in force since April 24, 2009, which amount is accounted for as "administrative expenses" for MCh$710, MCh$998 and MCh$839 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Contract entered into with Banco Estado
Service to pay pensions with Banco Estado; Contract in force since March 31, 2010, which amount is accounted for as "administrative expenses" for MCh$223, MCh$236 and MCh$839 as of December 31, 2012, 2012 and 2010, respectively.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Contract entered into with Caja de Compensación Los Andes
Service to pay pensions with Caja de Compensación Los Andes; Contract in force since August 8, 2011, which amount is accounted for as "administrative expenses" for MCh$55 and MCh$8 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Contract entered into with Caja de Compensación Los Héroes
Service to pay pensions with Caja de Compensación Los Héroes; Contract in force since September 27, 2011, which amount is accounted for as "administrative expenses" for MCh$178 and MCh$0 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
d.6) Quarterly statement
Mailing service payment
Mailing services with AMF and Correos de Chile for delivering the individual capitalization account balance to the participants every four months. This contract is effective from September 2005 and March 2003, respectively. The amounts accounted for as "administrative expenses" amounted to MCh$1,031, MCh$952 and MCh$833 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
d.7) Other minor services
Other contracts with EFCO Servicios Generales S.A, Central de Restaurantes Aramark (for cleaning offices services), Comunicaciones Capitulo (telephone line), Imac (air conditioning) and Thyssenkrupp (elevators), resulted in costs recognized as “administrative expenses” amounting to MCh$274, MCh$308 and MCh$340 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
NOTE 27. DISAGGREGATION OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES ACCORDING TO THE FUND TYPE WHERE THEY ORIGINATED
The following is a breakdown of operational revenues and expenses according to their origin and the type of fund originating them:
For the year ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||||
Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | Type E | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
A. Revenues | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees for depositing mandatory contributions and APV | 32,551 | 45,023 | 53,006 | 13,585 | 6,478 | 150,643 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees for programmed withdrawals and temporary income | 8 | 12 | 424 | 2,020 | 308 | 2,772 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain on mandatory investments | 2,588 | 2,617 | 6,405 | 2,231 | 674 | 14,515 |
For the year ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||||
Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | Type E | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
B. Expenses | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||
Life and disability insurance premium | (715 | ) | (1,013 | ) | (1,302 | ) | (533 | ) | (155 | ) | (3,718 | ) | ||||||||||||
Wages and salaries to sales personnel | 2,087 | 2,887 | 3,889 | 1,000 | 435 | 10,298 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees paid for custody of securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• National | 110 | 125 | 325 | 124 | 45 | 729 | ||||||||||||||||||
• Foreign | 69 | 78 | 265 | 77 | 28 | 517 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees paid to proxies of investments abroad | 10 | 12 | 132 | 12 | 4 | 170 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expenses for transactions in stock exchange | 60 | 68 | 295 | 67 | 24 | 514 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||||
Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | Type E | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
A. Revenues | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees for depositing mandatory contributions and APV | 33,586 | 42,337 | 47,673 | 10,705 | 3,363 | 137,664 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees for programmed withdrawals and temporary income | 10 | 17 | 535 | 1,883 | 250 | 2,695 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain on mandatory investments | (3,106 | ) | (1,700 | ) | (378 | ) | 1,187 | 528 | (3,469 | ) |
For the year ended December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||||
Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | Type E | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
B. Expenses | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||
Life and disability insurance premium | (494 | ) | (671 | ) | (840 | ) | (265 | ) | (55 | ) | (2,325 | ) | ||||||||||||
Wages and salaries to sales personnel | 2,204 | 2,778 | 3,162 | 826 | 237 | 9,207 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees paid for custody of securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• National | 163 | 205 | 234 | 61 | 18 | 681 | ||||||||||||||||||
• Foreign | 141 | 178 | 202 | 53 | 15 | 589 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees paid to proxies of investments abroad | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Expenses for transactions in stock exchange | 56 | 58 | 326 | 48 | 11 | 499 |
For the year ended December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||||
Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | Type E | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
A. Revenues | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees for depositing mandatory contributions and APV | 32,256 | 39,812 | 43,791 | 9,501 | 2,641 | 128,001 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees for programmed withdrawals and temporary income | 10 | 23 | 475 | 1,571 | 193 | 2,272 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain on mandatory investments | 4,956 | 4,878 | 9,314 | 2,309 | 429 | 21,886 |
For the year ended December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | ||||||||||||||||||||
Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | Type E | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
B. Expenses | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||||||||||
Life and disability insurance premium | 579 | 715 | 794 | 199 | 51 | 2,338 | ||||||||||||||||||
Wages and salaries to sales personnel | 2,652 | 3,275 | 3,638 | 910 | 233 | 10,708 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees paid for custody of securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
• National | 148 | 166 | 220 | 60 | 14 | 608 | ||||||||||||||||||
• Foreign | 128 | 157 | 200 | 53 | 15 | 553 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fees paid to proxies of investments abroad | 10 | 11 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expenses for transactions in stock exchange | 107 | 125 | 192 | 77 | 13 | 514 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 28. MISCELLANEOUS OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Administrative expenses | 22,935 | 22,140 | 22,479 | |||||||||
Data processing expenses | 3,902 | 3,794 | 3,270 | |||||||||
Other operating expenses (1) | 3,213 | 2,947 | 2,718 | |||||||||
Marketing expenses | 1,884 | 1,784 | 1,541 | |||||||||
Total | 31,934 | 30,665 | 30,008 |
(1) | Correspond to the expenses incurred for the evaluation and qualification of disability status of the participants |
NOTE 29. FINANCE COSTS
The detail of finance costs as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Interests for leasing contracts | 25 | 28 | 29 | |||||||||
Interests for use of bank overdraft line | 5 | - | 12 | |||||||||
Other | - | 93 | 62 | |||||||||
Total | 30 | 121 | 103 |
NOTE 30. OTHER NON-OPERATING EXPENSES
The detail of other non-operating expenses as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, is as follows:
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Fines from State institutions | 126 | 61 | 41 | |||||||||
Litigation | 14 | 23 | 22 | |||||||||
Other | 199 | 292 | 133 | |||||||||
Total | 339 | 376 | 196 |
NOTE 31. OTHER NON-OPERATING INCOME
The balance corresponding to “Other non-operating income” as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, is detailed as follows:
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
MCh$ | MCh$ | MCh$ | ||||||||||
Rentals | 1,741 | 1,843 | 2,184 | |||||||||
Gains on sales of assets | 1,761 | 560 | - | |||||||||
Other income | 1,399 | 647 | 380 | |||||||||
Total | 4,901 | 3,050 | 2,564 |
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 32. CONTINGENCIES AND RESTRICTIONS
a) | Guarantees granted: |
Creditor of the Guarantee | Debtor | Type of Guarantee | Files Compromised | Pending payment of balance at closure of Financial Statements | Release of Guarantees | ||||
Under secretary of Finance | Name | Relation | Solidarian Codebtor | Type | Accounted Value MCh$ | 2012 MCh$ | 2013 MCh$ | 2013 MCh$ | Assets MCh$ |
AFC | Subsidiary | Guarantee letters | 2,072 | 2,072 | - | 2,072 | - |
AFP Provida, as ratified by Shareholders’ vote held on January 7, 2002, has guaranteed a debt in the amount of UF 400,000 (MCh$9,136) to Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía de Chile S.A. The debt was incurred so that Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía de Chile S.A., could comply with certain requirements of the Unemployment Insurance Administration which may include, but are not limited to, standby letters of credit. The guarantee submitted by AFP Provida consisted in constituting the Administrator, in October 2002, as warrantor and joint co-signer exclusively of 37.8% of the aforementioned amount, in the contract for credit line operations intended to cover any eventual payments of bank guarantee letters signed by Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía de Chile S.A., in addition to the respective promissory notes, which maturity date is April 25, 2013.
On February 4, 2010, the Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía reimbursed the Company with bank guarantee letters of for the amount of UF 160,000 (MCh$3,655).
b) | Disability and Survival Pensions and Life Annuities |
Article 82 of D.L. 3,500 of 1980 established that when an insurance company does not fulfill obligations originating from signed contracts, the State Guarantee will cover the minimum fixed income defined in Articles 73, 77 and 78. For income or pensions exceeding those amounts, the State Guarantee will cover 75% of the excess, with a maximum of UF 45 (MCh$1).
The Company’s contingency is approximately UF 914,019 (MCh$20,877). The basic assumptions of this calculation made on pensions generated before January 1, 1988 are based on a life expectancy of 28 years for pension beneficiaries, an annual discount rate of 5% and the application of the previously mentioned State Guarantee. Pension fund participants’ claims against insurance companies would be subject to the privilege established in Article 2,472, No 4 of the Civil Code.
c) | Insurance Contract |
AFP Provida entered into an insurance contract with BBVA Seguros de Vida S.A. from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2009 with payment rates described in Note 13, letter b), establishing an adjustment in the insurance rate in accordance with variations of casualties and monthly pre-payments of financial revenues.
On March 31, 2012, AFP Provida received UF 115,574.35 (MCh$2,640) from the insurance company BBVA Seguros de Vida corresponding to the January 2005-June 2009 period.
On April 30, 2011, AFP Provida received UF 25,016.49 (MCh$571) from the insurance company BBVA Seguros de Vida for the final settlement from the August 2003 - December 2004 contract.
On March 31, 2011, AFP Provida paid UF 20,652.67 (MCh$472) to the insurance company BBVA Seguros de Vida corresponding to the January 2005-June 2009 period and UF 62.35 (MCh$1) from the
August 2003 – December 2004 period.
d) | Litigation or other actions in which the company is involved: |
As of December 31, 2012, there were labor lawsuits presented by the Administrator’s former employees, which are filed in various courts throughout the country. In the opinion of the Company’s Legal Advisory Division, at the end of these lawsuits, there will not be relevant unfavorable effects on the Company’s results.
Additionally, there are pending labor lawsuits related to pension matters in certain courts. According to the opinion of the Company’s Legal Advisory Division, there will not be unfavorable material effects on the Company’s results.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Nevertheless, it is probable that an outflow or resources embodying economic benefits will be required to resolve the lawsuits and a sufficiently reliable estimate of the obligation can be made. To cover probable losses due to these lawsuits, the Company has established a provision for MCh$127 as of December 31, 2012.
NOTE 33. SEGMENTS
The Company has only one segment.
NOTE 34. SANCTIONS
a) | From the Superintendency of Pensions: |
According to Resolution N°0012 of February 15, 2011, the Superintendency of Pensions sent an admonition for breaking regulations instructed by the Superintendency of Pensions in connection with the regularization of excess of investments in variable income securities in fund Types C and D.
According to Resolution N°0017 of February 23, 2011, the Superintendency of Pensions sent an admonition for breaking regulations instructed by the Superintendency of Pensions in connection with the elaboration and submission of conciliation files related to funds transferred to the Social Pension Institute for the payment of solidarity pension contributions.
According to Resolution N° 24 of April 15, 2011, the Superintendency of Pensions applied a fine of UF 200 (MCh$5) for maintaining a net seller position in Chilean pesos regarding forward contracts that involved Chilean Peso and Euro concerning Fund Types A, B, C, D and E, thus, breaking the regulation established in Book IV, Title I, Letter A of the Standards Compendium of the Superintendency of Pensions.
According to Resolution N°0053 of August 29, 2011, the Superintendency of Pensions sent an admonition for omitting in the electronic certificates information regarding the fee charged by an intermediary in the programmed withdrawals of 42 participants, implying that 19 out of such 42 participants paid a higher fee than the one established by the regulation.
According to Resolution N°0078 of November 21, 2011, the Superintendency of Pensions sent an admonition for breaking instructions of Circular Note 1227 by omitting information regarding participation of the Company’s executives in other societies.
According to Resolution N° 0080 of November 29, 2011, the Superintendency of Pensions applied a fine of UF 3,500 (MCh$80) for irregularities in connection with the life and disability insurance coverage. On December 9, 2011, AFP Provida appealed to the Superintendency of Pensions for reconsideration of judgment. Subsequently, on June 06, 2012, the Superintendency of Pensions through Ordinary Note N°13,538 rejected the appeal lodged by AFP Provida.
According to Resolution N°0007 of January 30, 2012, the Superintendency of Pensions sent an admonition for failure to attend shareholder’s meetings of Fintesa Securitizadora S.A. held on February 10 and March 11, 2011, not being exempt, as per regulations of Book VI, title IX, Letter A, Chapter I, article IV of the Compendium of Rules issued by the Pension Superintendency.
According to Resolution N°0015 of February 7, 2012, the Superintendency of Pensions applied a fine of UF 200 (MCh$5) for omitting a forward contract for Fund Type C, and recording a forward contract as sale of Mexican Pesos against Chilean Pesos, but the contract was a purchase of foreign currency related to national currency.
According to Resolution N°0017 of February 9, 2012, the Superintendency of Pensions applied a fine of UF 200 (MCh$5) for irregularities in the electronic transmission of certificates to SCOMP.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
According to Resolution N°0034 of June 6, 2012, the Superintendency of Pensions sent an admonition to inform to the Social Pension Institute a factor actuarially wrong regarding its participants, which provoked an alteration in the solidarity pension contribution paid to them.
According to Resolution N°0040 of June 6, 2012, the Superintendency of Pensions applied a fine of UF 200 (MCh$5) for breaking the ruling regulation by purchasing a bond first issued from JP Morgan Chase Bank of ISIN XS624807698 on June 21, 2011, an instrument that at that date was not eligible for pension funds.
According to Resolution N°53 of August 21, 2012, the Superintendency of Pensions applied a fine of UF 400 (MCh$9) for irregularities in the treatment of transferring funds from IPS (Social Pension Institute) for payments of APS (Solidarity Pension Contributions).
According to Resolution N°0069 of October 9, 2012, the Superintendency of Pensions sent an admonition for breaking the ruling regulation established in Articles 4 bis, 12, 69 first and second clauses in relation to Articles 17, second clause, 54, and 59, all of them of Decree Law 3,500 of 1980, when determining charges and payments of the life and disability insurance premium.
According to Resolution N°0094 of December 19, 2012, the Superintendency of Pensions applied a fine of UF 200 (MCh$5) for breaking the ruling regulation regarding currency hedging.
According to Resolution N°00100 of December 27, 2012, the Superintendency of Pensions sent an admonition for breaking the ruling regulation regarding information of fees paid in pension funds for investments in investments vehicles.
b) | From other administrative authorities: |
For all periods presented there are no sanctions from other administrative authorities.
NOTE 35. ENVIRONMENT
The Company does not own industrial facilities that can affect the environment.
ADMINISTRADORA DE FONDOS DE PENSIONES PROVIDA S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 36. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On January 9, 2013 Provida received a proceeds totaling US$130,098,199.80 for the sale of AFORE Bancomer, on which taxes were paid in Mexico amounting to US$12,341,116.54. This transaction was approved in the Extraordinary Shareholders’ of Provida Internacional meeting held on November 27, 2012. The book value of the non-current assets held for sale at that date was US$42,445,899.87 which amount including the reversal of the accumulative translation adjustment will result in a gain net of taxes of US$68,201,909.40 on the sale.
In the Extraordinary Shareholders meeting of Provida Internacional S.A. held on January 23, 2013, it was agreed to sell the entire stake in the Peruvian entity "Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Horizonte S.A.” equivalent to 15.87% of share capital, to a company in the BBVA Group that would be indicated by BBVA S.A, Spain. The transaction was on February 27, 2013 and amounted to a gain net of taxes of US$42,893,579.85.
According to Resolution N°0014 of January 29, 2013, the Superintendency of Pensions applied a fine of UF 200 (MCh$5) for breaking the ruling regulation relating to the attendance to the Shareholders’ meeting established in the Article 45 bis of Decree Law 3,500.
On February 1, 2013, BBVA Spain, ultimate parent of AFP Provida S.A., subscribed a sale agreement with MetLife Group for the entire stake held in AFP Provida (parent company of Provida Internacional S.A.) equivalent approximately to 64.3%.
On April 2, 2013, Administradora de Fondos de Cesantía Chile S.A. informed that on March 26, 2013 it replaced six original bank guarantee letters issued by Banco Santander and taken on behalf of the Under-Secretary of Finance and under its custody for a total amount of UF 240,000. Such guarantee letters had an expiration date on April 25, 2013, acting AFP Provida as warrantor and joint co-signer for the obligations arising from such letters. The six new letters issued by the same bank and similar total amount have an expiration date on January 31, 2014 and shareholders are not considered as sureties, warrantors guarantors or joint co-signers.
At the date of the issue of these financial statements (April 17, 2013) no significant subsequent event exists that could materially affect these financial statements.
F-72