2. Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation | 6 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Note 2. Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation | ' |
The consolidated financial statements included herein, presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and stated in US dollars, have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. |
|
These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein. It is suggested that these consolidated interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for SET Corp for the year ended March 31, 2013 included in SET Corp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending March 31, 2014. |
|
Consolidation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and operating results of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Pro Water, LLC, a Utah limited liability company ("Pro Water Utah"), ProWater, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company ("ProWater Colorado"), and SET IP Holdings LLC, a Utah limited liability company ("Set IP"), after elimination of all material inter-company accounts and transactions. |
|
Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the valuation of derivatives, equity instruments such as options and warrants, and provision for income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
Effective October 1, 2009, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 825 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, except as it applies to the nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities subject to ASC 825. ASC 825 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 825 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value: |
|
Level 1 - Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
Level 2 - Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace. |
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity. |
|
Fair-value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash, prepaids, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and notes payable. Fair values for these items were assumed to approximate carrying values because of their short term nature or because they are payable on demand. |
|
Concentrations |
|
Credit Risk |
|
At times, the Company maintains cash balances at a financial institution in excess of the $250,000 FDIC insurance limit. In addition, at times the Company extends credit to customers in the normal course of business, after an evaluation of the credit worthiness. The Company does not expect to take any unnecessary credit risks causing significant write-offs of potentially uncollectible accounts. The Company also maintains reserves for potential credit losses. The Company considers the following factors when determining if collection of a fee is reasonably assured: customer credit-worthiness, past transaction history with the customer, current economic industry trends and changes in customer payment terms. |
|
Customer |
|
The geographic location of the injection well is a direct factor with relation to the radius of customers’ wells that can be economically serviced. While there are several key factors to obtaining new business, the ratio of available business per customer is based solely on the number of wells the customer has within the serviceable radius of the injection well. As new gas wells are developed within the serviceable radius of the well, the ratio of customers to percentage of business will decrease. Until new wells are developed, the expected customer to business ratio is not expected to change. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had five (5) and two (2) customers that accounted for approximately 86% and 98% of its revenue, respectively. During the six months ended September 30, 2013, the Company had three (3) customers that accounted for approximately 65% of its revenue and four (4) customers that accounted for 83% of its accounts receivable at September 30, 2013. During the six months ended September 30, 2012, the Company had two (2) customers that accounted for approximately 97% of its revenue and one (1) customer that accounted for 90% of its accounts receivable at September 30, 2012. The loss of our injection well customers would have a significant impact on the Company’s financial results. In addition, we are selling our reclaimed oil to three customers. Revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2013 for our largest customer has also decreased by 72% compared to the corresponding prior period due to the customer now operating its own injection well. If there were an issue with these customers, we have additional oil customers that would potentially take this position. |
|
Earnings Per Common Share |
|
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the combination of dilutive common share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under the Company’s share-based compensation plans and the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive effect of in-the-money share equivalents, which are calculated based on the average share price for each period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the exercise price of an award, if any, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the estimated tax benefits that would be recorded in paid-in capital, if any, when an award is settled are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current period. |
|
The Company excluded 444,930 options and 500,000 warrants from the computation of diluted net loss per share as their exercise prices were in excess of the average closing market price of the Company’s common stock for the three and six months ended September 30, 2013. |
|
The following is a summary of outstanding securities which have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012: |
|
| | Three Months | | | Six Months | |
Ended September 30, 2012 | Ended September 30, 2012 |
| | | | | | |
Common stock options | | | 277,544 | | | | 376,667 | |
Common stock warrants | | | – | | | | – | |
Convertible notes | | | 1,398,015 | | | | 1,398,015 | |
Totals | | | 1,675,559 | | | | 1,774,682 | |
|
The Company excluded 95,250 options and 1,978,835 warrants from the computation for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as their exercise prices were in excess of the average closing market price of the Company’s common stock. |