Document and Entity Information
Document and Entity Information - shares | 9 Months Ended | |
Jun. 30, 2017 | Jul. 31, 2017 | |
Document and Entity Information [Abstract] | ||
Entity Registrant Name | AMERIGAS PARTNERS LP | |
Entity Central Index Key | 932,628 | |
Document Type | 10-Q | |
Document Period End Date | Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Amendment Flag | false | |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2,017 | |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q3 | |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --09-30 | |
Entity Filer Category | Large Accelerated Filer | |
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 92,958,586 |
Condensed Consolidated Balance
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Jun. 30, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2016 |
Current assets: | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 4,710 | $ 15,827 | $ 307,657 |
Accounts receivable (less allowances for doubtful accounts of $12,801, $11,436 and $11,952, respectively) | 205,039 | 182,665 | 187,551 |
Accounts receivable — related parties | 3,236 | 2,643 | 3,108 |
Inventories | 93,892 | 78,823 | 81,571 |
Derivative instruments | 2,080 | 7,994 | 8,968 |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 52,129 | 56,496 | 48,264 |
Total current assets | 361,086 | 344,448 | 637,119 |
Property, plant and equipment (less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $1,584,416, $1,499,396 and $1,468,332, respectively) | 1,231,653 | 1,274,557 | 1,285,518 |
Goodwill | 2,002,046 | 1,978,981 | 1,978,894 |
Intangible assets, net | 399,738 | 411,319 | 420,473 |
Derivative instruments | 279 | 1,166 | 891 |
Other assets | 43,172 | 47,299 | 43,864 |
Total assets | 4,037,974 | 4,057,770 | 4,366,759 |
Current liabilities: | |||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 11,332 | 8,475 | 358,605 |
Short-term borrowings | 75,500 | 153,200 | 11,400 |
Accounts payable — trade | 89,097 | 94,007 | 81,358 |
Accounts payable — related parties | 869 | 2,759 | 684 |
Customer deposits and advances | 69,024 | 119,319 | 79,174 |
Derivative instruments | 2,457 | 381 | 4,562 |
Other current liabilities | 182,198 | 210,314 | 178,173 |
Total current liabilities | 430,477 | 588,455 | 713,956 |
Long-term debt | 2,567,994 | 2,325,334 | 2,329,000 |
Derivative instruments | 14 | 36 | 963 |
Other noncurrent liabilities | 136,732 | 124,736 | 116,855 |
Total liabilities | 3,135,217 | 3,038,561 | 3,160,774 |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) | |||
AmeriGas Partners, L.P. partners’ capital: | |||
Common unitholders (units issued — 92,958,063, 92,923,410 and 92,922,926, respectively) | 850,578 | 967,073 | 1,150,641 |
General partner | 15,973 | 17,148 | 19,004 |
Total AmeriGas Partners, L.P. partners’ capital | 866,551 | 984,221 | 1,169,645 |
Noncontrolling interest | 36,206 | 34,988 | 36,340 |
Total partners’ capital | 902,757 | 1,019,209 | 1,205,985 |
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ 4,037,974 | $ 4,057,770 | $ 4,366,759 |
Condensed Consolidated Balance3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Jun. 30, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2016 |
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract] | |||
Accounts receivable, allowances for doubtful accounts | $ 12,801 | $ 11,436 | $ 11,952 |
Property, plant and equipment, accumulated depreciation and amortization | $ 1,584,416 | $ 1,499,396 | $ 1,468,332 |
Common unitholders, units issued | 92,958,063 | 92,923,410 | 92,922,926 |
Condensed Consolidated Statemen
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | |
Revenues: | ||||
Propane | $ 403,954 | $ 385,566 | $ 1,803,816 | $ 1,718,748 |
Other | 63,542 | 61,118 | 204,506 | 199,521 |
Total, revenues | 467,496 | 446,684 | 2,008,322 | 1,918,269 |
Costs and expenses: | ||||
Cost of sales — propane (excluding depreciation shown below) | 181,047 | 121,812 | 762,531 | 591,355 |
Cost of sales — other (excluding depreciation shown below) | 22,367 | 21,145 | 60,276 | 59,173 |
Operating and administrative expenses | 227,372 | 217,154 | 694,180 | 686,578 |
Depreciation | 35,482 | 35,668 | 103,891 | 110,807 |
Amortization | 10,659 | 10,742 | 31,873 | 32,228 |
Other operating income, net | (8,294) | (6,041) | (10,787) | (22,079) |
Total, costs and expenses | 468,633 | 400,480 | 1,641,964 | 1,458,062 |
Operating (loss) income | (1,137) | 46,204 | 366,358 | 460,207 |
Loss on extinguishments of debt | (4,434) | (37,086) | (59,729) | (37,086) |
Interest expense | (40,577) | (40,838) | (120,596) | (122,669) |
(Loss) income before income taxes | (46,148) | (31,720) | 186,033 | 300,452 |
Income tax expense | (646) | (907) | (2,129) | (2,107) |
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interest | (46,794) | (32,627) | 183,904 | 298,345 |
Add net loss (deduct net income) attributable to noncontrolling interest | 42 | (442) | (3,614) | (4,533) |
Net (loss) income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. | (46,752) | (33,069) | 180,290 | 293,812 |
General partner’s interest in net (loss) income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. | 10,862 | 10,101 | 34,000 | 30,663 |
Limited partners’ interest in net (loss) income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. | $ (57,614) | $ (43,170) | $ 146,290 | $ 263,149 |
(Loss) income per limited partner unit — basic and diluted: | ||||
Basic (in usd per unit) | $ (0.62) | $ (0.46) | $ 1.56 | $ 2.81 |
Diluted (in usd per unit) | $ (0.62) | $ (0.46) | $ 1.56 | $ 2.80 |
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding (thousands): | ||||
Basic (in units) | 93,009 | 92,960 | 92,993 | 92,945 |
Diluted (in units) | 93,009 | 92,960 | 93,045 | 93,019 |
Condensed Consolidated Stateme5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 9 Months Ended | |
Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||
Net income including noncontrolling interest | $ 183,904 | $ 298,345 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income including noncontrolling interest to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||
Depreciation and amortization | 135,764 | 143,035 |
Provision for uncollectible accounts | 9,667 | 9,354 |
Change in unrealized losses (gains) on derivative instruments | 8,853 | (61,671) |
Loss on extinguishments of debt | 59,729 | 37,086 |
Other, net | 16,534 | 649 |
Net change in: | ||
Accounts receivable | (33,942) | 427 |
Inventories | (14,648) | 12,609 |
Accounts payable | (3,699) | (22,105) |
Other current assets | (3,272) | 10,610 |
Other current liabilities | (70,402) | (65,937) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 288,488 | 362,402 |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment | (74,482) | (74,472) |
Proceeds from disposals of assets | 16,252 | 11,230 |
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired | (36,824) | (36,678) |
Net cash used by investing activities | (95,054) | (99,920) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||
Distributions | (298,232) | (288,891) |
Noncontrolling interest activity | (2,396) | (4,350) |
Decrease in short-term borrowings | (77,700) | (56,700) |
Issuances of long-term debt, net of issuance costs | 1,207,727 | 1,333,407 |
Repayments of long-term debt, including redemption premiums | (1,035,430) | (954,186) |
Proceeds associated with equity-based compensation plans, net of tax withheld | 1,465 | 1,127 |
Capital contributions from General Partner | 15 | 11 |
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities | (204,551) | 30,418 |
Cash and cash equivalents (decrease) increase | (11,117) | 292,900 |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | ||
End of period | 4,710 | 307,657 |
Beginning of period | 15,827 | 14,757 |
(Decrease) increase | $ (11,117) | $ 292,900 |
Condensed Consolidated Stateme6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital (unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Total | Total AmeriGas Partners, L.P. partners’ capital | Common units | General partner | Noncontrolling interest |
Beginning Balance (in units) at Sep. 30, 2015 | 92,889,980 | ||||
Beginning Balance at Sep. 30, 2015 | $ 1,200,373 | $ 1,164,216 | $ 1,145,291 | $ 18,925 | $ 36,157 |
Increase (Decrease) in Partners' Capital | |||||
Net income including noncontrolling interest | 298,345 | 293,812 | 263,149 | 30,663 | 4,533 |
Distributions | (293,241) | (288,891) | (258,296) | (30,595) | (4,350) |
Unit-based compensation expense | 1,070 | 1,070 | $ 1,070 | ||
Common Units issued in connection with employee and director plans, net of tax withheld (in units) | 32,946 | ||||
Common Units issued in connection with employee and director plans, net of tax withheld | (562) | (562) | $ (573) | 11 | |
Ending Balance (in units) at Jun. 30, 2016 | 92,922,926 | ||||
Ending Balance at Jun. 30, 2016 | 1,205,985 | 1,169,645 | $ 1,150,641 | 19,004 | 36,340 |
Beginning Balance (in units) at Sep. 30, 2016 | 92,923,410 | ||||
Beginning Balance at Sep. 30, 2016 | 1,019,209 | 984,221 | $ 967,073 | 17,148 | 34,988 |
Increase (Decrease) in Partners' Capital | |||||
Net income including noncontrolling interest | 183,904 | 180,290 | 146,290 | 34,000 | 3,614 |
Distributions | (302,230) | (298,232) | (263,042) | (35,190) | (3,998) |
Unit-based compensation expense | 1,013 | 1,013 | $ 1,013 | ||
General Partner contribution to AmeriGas Propane, L.P. | 1,602 | 0 | 1,602 | ||
Common Units issued in connection with employee and director plans, net of tax withheld (in units) | 34,653 | ||||
Common Units issued in connection with employee and director plans, net of tax withheld | (741) | (741) | $ (756) | 15 | |
Ending Balance (in units) at Jun. 30, 2017 | 92,958,063 | ||||
Ending Balance at Jun. 30, 2017 | $ 902,757 | $ 866,551 | $ 850,578 | $ 15,973 | $ 36,206 |
Nature of Operations
Nature of Operations | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
Nature of Operations | Note 1 — Nature of Operations AmeriGas Partners, L.P. (“AmeriGas Partners”) is a publicly traded limited partnership that conducts a national propane distribution business through its principal operating subsidiary AmeriGas Propane, L.P. (“AmeriGas OLP”). AmeriGas Partners and AmeriGas OLP are Delaware limited partnerships. AmeriGas Partners, AmeriGas OLP and all of their subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as “the Partnership” or “we.” AmeriGas OLP is engaged in the distribution of propane and related equipment and supplies. AmeriGas OLP comprises the largest retail propane distribution business in the United States serving residential, commercial, industrial, motor fuel and agricultural customers in all 50 states. At June 30, 2017 , AmeriGas Propane, Inc. (the “General Partner”), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of UGI Corporation (“UGI”), held a 1% general partner interest in AmeriGas Partners and a 1.01% general partner interest in AmeriGas OLP. The General Partner and, prior to its merger with and into the General Partner effective October 1, 2016, Petrolane Incorporated (a predecessor company of the Partnership), also owns AmeriGas Partners Common Units (“Common Units”). The remaining Common Units outstanding represents publicly held Common Units. Common Units represent limited partner interests in AmeriGas Partners. AmeriGas Partners holds a 98.99% limited partner interest in AmeriGas OLP. AmeriGas Partners and AmeriGas OLP have no employees. Employees of the General Partner conduct, direct and manage our operations. The General Partner is reimbursed monthly for all direct and indirect expenses it incurs on our behalf (see Note 9 ). |
Summary of Significant Accounti
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). They include all adjustments which we consider necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Such adjustments consist only of normal recurring items unless otherwise disclosed. The September 30, 2016 , condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 (“the Partnership’s 2016 Annual Report”). Weather significantly impacts demand for propane and profitability because many customers use propane for heating purposes. Due to the seasonal nature of the Partnership’s propane business, the results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year. Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AmeriGas Partners, its majority-owned subsidiary AmeriGas OLP, and its 100% -owned finance subsidiaries AmeriGas Finance Corp., AmeriGas Eagle Finance Corp., AP Eagle Finance Corp., and AmeriGas Finance LLC. AmeriGas Partners and AmeriGas OLP are under the common control of the General Partner. The General Partner of AmeriGas OLP, which is also the General Partner of AmeriGas Partners, makes all decisions for AmeriGas OLP; limited partners of AmeriGas OLP do not have the ability to remove the General Partner or participate in the decision-making for AmeriGas OLP. The accounts of AmeriGas OLP are included based upon the determination that AmeriGas Partners has a controlling financial interest in and is the primary beneficiary of AmeriGas OLP. Allocation of Net Income (Loss) . Net income (loss) attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. for partners’ capital and statement of operations presentation purposes is allocated to the General Partner and the limited partners in accordance with their respective ownership percentages after giving effect to amounts distributed to the General Partner in excess of its 1% general partner interest in AmeriGas Partners based on its incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”) under the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AmeriGas Partners, L.P., as amended (“Partnership Agreement”). Net Income (Loss) Per Unit. Income (loss) per limited partner unit is computed in accordance with GAAP regarding the application of the two-class method for determining income (loss) per unit for master limited partnerships (“MLPs”) when IDRs are present. The two-class method requires that income per limited partner unit be calculated as if all earnings for the period were distributed and requires a separate calculation for each quarter- and year-to-date period. In periods when our net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners exceeds our Available Cash, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, and is above certain levels, the calculation according to the two-class method results in an increased allocation of undistributed earnings to the General Partner. Generally, in periods when our Available Cash in respect of the quarter- or year-to-date periods exceeds our net income (loss) attributable to AmeriGas Partners, the calculation according to the two-class method results in an allocation of earnings to the General Partner greater than its relative ownership interest in the Partnership (or in the case of a net loss attributable to AmeriGas Partners, an allocation of such net loss to the Common Unitholders greater than their relative ownership interest in the Partnership). The following table sets forth reconciliations of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted income per limited partner unit computations: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended 2017 2016 2017 2016 Net (loss) income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. $ (46,752 ) $ (33,069 ) $ 180,290 $ 293,812 Adjust for general partner share and theoretical distributions of net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. to the general partner in accordance with the two-class method for MLPs (10,862 ) (10,101 ) (34,908 ) (33,039 ) Common Unitholders’ interest in net (loss) income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. under the two-class method for MLPs $ (57,614 ) $ (43,170 ) $ 145,382 $ 260,773 Weighted average Common Units outstanding — basic (thousands) 93,009 92,960 92,993 92,945 Potentially dilutive Common Units (thousands) — — 52 74 Weighted average Common Units outstanding — diluted (thousands) 93,009 92,960 93,045 93,019 Theoretical distributions of net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. in accordance with the two-class method for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , resulted in an increased allocation of net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. to the General Partner in the computation of income per limited partner unit which had the effect of decreasing earnings per limited partner unit by $0.01 and $0.03 , respectively. There was no dilutive effect based on the computation of income (loss) per limited partner unit in accordance with the two-class method for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 . Potentially dilutive Common Units included in the diluted limited partner units outstanding computation reflect the effects of restricted Common Unit awards granted under the General Partner’s incentive compensation plans. Derivative Instruments. Derivative instruments are reported on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair values, unless the derivative instruments qualify for the normal purchase and normal sale (“NPNS”) exception under GAAP. The accounting for changes in fair value depends upon the purpose of the derivative instrument and whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. For the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , none of our derivative instruments were designated as hedges under GAAP. Changes in the fair values of commodity derivative instruments for all periods presented are reflected in “Cost of sales — propane” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Cash flows from derivative instruments are included in cash flows from operating activities. For additional information on the accounting for our derivative instruments, see Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Partnership’s 2016 Annual Report. Deferred Debt Issuance Costs. During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016, we adopted new accounting guidance regarding the classification of deferred debt issuance costs. Deferred debt issuance costs associated with long-term debt are reflected as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of such debt. Deferred debt issuance costs associated with line of credit facilities continue to be classified as “ Other assets ” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As a result of the retrospective application of the new accounting guidance, the Partnership has reflected $30,480 of such costs as a reduction to long-term debt, including current maturities, on the June 30, 2016 , Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Previously, these costs were presented within “ Prepaid expenses and other current assets ” and “ Other assets .” Environmental Matters. We are subject to environmental laws and regulations intended to mitigate or remove the effects of past operations and improve or maintain the quality of the environment. These laws and regulations require the removal or remedy of the effect on the environment of the disposal or release of certain specified hazardous substances at current or former operating sites. Environmental reserves are accrued when assessments indicate that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. Amounts recorded as environmental liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets represent our best estimate of costs expected to be incurred or, if no best estimate can be made, the minimum liability associated with a range of expected environmental investigation and remediation costs. Our estimated liability for environmental contamination is reduced to reflect anticipated participation of other responsible parties but is not reduced for possible recovery from insurance carriers. In those instances for which the amount and timing of cash payments associated with environmental investigation and cleanup are reliably determinable, we discount such liabilities to reflect the time value of money. We intend to pursue recovery of incurred costs through all appropriate means. Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and costs. These estimates are based on management’s knowledge of current events, historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results may be different from these estimates and assumptions. Correction of Prior Period Error. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Partnership determined that it had not properly recorded gains on sales of fixed assets relating to certain assets acquired in the acquisition of Heritage Propane in Fiscal 2012. The Partnership evaluated the impact of the error on prior periods and determined that the effect was not material to the financial statements for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 , or any prior period financial statements, and recorded the cumulative effect of the error in accounting for certain property, plant and equipment disposals as of October 1, 2016. The correction of the error decreased “ Other operating income, net ” by $8,847 and decreased “ Depreciation ” by $1,162 , which is reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 . Reclassifications. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-period presentation. |
Accounting Changes
Accounting Changes | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract] | |
Accounting Changes | Note 3 — Accounting Changes Adoption of New Accounting Standards Consolidation. Effective October 1, 2016, the Partnership adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-02, “Amendments to Consolidation Analysis” and ASU No. 2016-17, “Interest Held through Related Parties That Are under Common Control.” These ASUs provide new accounting guidance regarding whether a reporting entity should consolidate certain types of legal entities including variable interest entities (“VIEs”). Among other things, the new guidance affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs and requires that, under ASU 2015-02, if a single decision maker and its related parties are under common control, the single decision maker consider indirect interests in the entity held through these related parties to be the equivalent of direct interests, in their entirety. ASU 2016-07 amended the guidance in ASU 2015-02 to provide that such indirect interests be considered the equivalent of direct interests, on a proportionate basis. The adoption of this new guidance did not impact our consolidated financial statements. Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted Goodwill Impairment. In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” Under the new accounting guidance, an entity will no longer determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Instead, an entity will perform its goodwill impairment tests by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity will recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value but not to exceed the total amount of the goodwill of the reporting unit. The provisions of the new accounting guidance are required to be applied prospectively. The new accounting guidance is effective for the Partnership for goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 (Fiscal 2021). Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Partnership expects to adopt the new guidance in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2017. Cash Flow Classification. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” This ASU provides guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (Fiscal 2019). Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in the ASU should generally be adopted on a retrospective basis. The Partnership is in the process of assessing the impact on its financial statements from the adoption of the new guidance and determining the period in which the new guidance will be adopted. Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases." This ASU amends existing guidance to require entities that lease assets to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases on the balance sheet. The new guidance also requires additional disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows from leases. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 (Fiscal 2020). Early adoption is permitted. Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The Partnership is in the process of assessing the impact on its financial statements from the adoption of the new guidance and determining the period in which the new guidance will be adopted but anticipates an increase in the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. Revenue Recognition. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The guidance provided under this ASU, as amended, supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance included in the ASC. The standard requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance is effective for the Partnership for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (Fiscal 2019) and allows for either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption. The Partnership has not yet selected a transition method and is in the process of assessing the impact on its financial statements from the adoption of the new guidance. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets | Note 4 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets The Partnership’s goodwill and intangible assets comprise the following: June 30, September 30, June 30, Goodwill (not subject to amortization) $ 2,002,046 $ 1,978,981 $ 1,978,894 Intangible assets: Customer relationships and noncompete agreements $ 536,894 $ 520,180 $ 529,739 Accumulated amortization (220,100 ) (191,805 ) (192,210 ) Intangible assets, net (definite-lived) 316,794 328,375 337,529 Trademarks and tradenames (indefinite-lived) 82,944 82,944 82,944 Total intangible assets, net $ 399,738 $ 411,319 $ 420,473 Amortization expense of intangible assets was $9,466 and $9,545 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. Amortization expense of intangible assets was $28,295 and $28,646 for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. No amortization expense is included in cost of sales on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The estimated aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets for the remainder of Fiscal 2017 and the next four fiscal years is as follows: remainder of Fiscal 2017 — $9,642 ; Fiscal 2018 — $38,248 ; Fiscal 2019 — $37,024 ; Fiscal 2020 — $35,803 ; Fiscal 2021 — $33,968 . |
Debt
Debt | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Debt Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Debt | Note 5 — Debt In December 2016, AmeriGas Partners and AmeriGas Finance Corp., a 100% wholly owned finance subsidiary of AmeriGas Partners, issued $ 700,000 of 5.50% Senior Notes due May 2025 (the “ 5.50% Senior Notes”). The 5.50% Senior Notes rank equally with AmeriGas Partners’ existing outstanding senior notes. The net proceeds from the issuance of the 5.50% Senior Notes were used in December 2016 for (1) the early repayment, pursuant to a tender offer, of a portion of AmeriGas Partners’ 7.00% Senior Notes (the “ 7.00% Senior Notes”) having an aggregate principal balance of $ 499,970 plus accrued and unpaid interest and early redemption premiums; (2) the reduction of short-term borrowings; and (3) general corporate purposes. In February 2017, AmeriGas Partners and AmeriGas Finance Corp. issued $ 525,000 of 5.75% Senior Notes due May 2027 (the “ 5.75% Senior Notes”). The 5.75% Senior Notes rank equally with AmeriGas Partners’ existing outstanding senior notes. The net proceeds from the issuance of the 5.75% Senior Notes were used in February 2017 for (1) the early repayment, pursuant to a tender offer, of a portion of the 7.00% Senior Notes having an aggregate principal balance of $378,340 plus accrued and unpaid interest and early redemption premiums; (2) the repayment of short-term borrowings; and (3) general corporate purposes. In May 2017, AmeriGas Partners repaid the remaining 7.00% Senior Notes not previously tendered, having an aggregate principal balance of $102,512 , plus early redemption premiums and accrued and unpaid interest. In connection with the early repayments of the Partnership’s Senior Notes, during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , the Partnership recognized losses which are reflected in “Loss on extinguishments of debt” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and comprise the following: Three Months Ended June 30, Nine Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 2017 2016 Early redemption premiums $ 3,588 $ 30,338 $ 51,253 $ 30,338 Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs 846 6,748 8,476 6,748 Loss on extinguishments of debt $ 4,434 $ 37,086 $ 59,729 $ 37,086 |
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and Contingencies | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Commitments and Contingencies | Note 6 — Commitments and Contingencies Contingencies Saranac Lake Environmental Matter. By letter dated March 6, 2008, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“DEC”) notified AmeriGas OLP that DEC had placed property purportedly owned by AmeriGas OLP in Saranac Lake, New York on its Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites. A site characterization study performed by the DEC disclosed contamination related to a former manufactured gas plant (“MGP”). At that time, AmeriGas OLP reviewed the preliminary site characterization prepared by the DEC and researched the history of the site, including the extent of AmeriGas OLP’s ownership of the site. In its written response to the DEC in early 2009, AmeriGas OLP disputed DEC’s contention it was a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) as it did not operate the MGP and appeared to only own a portion of the site. The DEC did not respond to the 2009 communication. In March 2017, the DEC communicated to AmeriGas OLP that the DEC had performed significant testing at the site and had drafted three Records of Decision (“RODs”) related to the site and requested additional information related to AmeriGas OLP’s purported ownership of the site. The DEC has estimated that its selected remediation plan will cost approximately $27,000 . AmeriGas OLP is in the process of responding to the DEC’s request for ownership information and continues to assert defenses based on the nature of its ownership and use of the site. AmeriGas believes it has identified other PRPs and is reviewing the appropriateness of the DEC’s remediation plan, which could affect the amount and allocation of financial responsibility. To AmeriGas OLP’s knowledge, the DEC has not commenced implementation of the remediation plan and has not indicated when such remediation will start. Based upon currently available information, the Partnership is unable to estimate the ultimate outcome and timing with respect to the resolution of this matter. The Partnership is working with outside counsel and its environmental consultants to determine the potential exposure and liability due to AmeriGas OLP’s purported ownership of the site. Based on our preliminary evaluation of the available information, during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Partnership accrued an environmental remediation liability of $7,545 related to the site, which amount is included in “Operating and administrative expenses” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Our share of the actual remediation costs could be significantly more or less than the accrued amount. Class Action Judgment. In connection with the Partnership’s 2012 acquisition of the subsidiaries of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (“ETP”) that operated ETP’s propane distribution business (“Heritage Propane”), the Partnership became party to a class action lawsuit that was filed against Heritage Operating, L.P. in 2005 by Alfred L. Williams, II, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. The class action lawsuit alleged, among other things, wrongful collection of tank rental payments from legacy customers of People’s Gas, which was acquired by Heritage Propane in 2000. In 2010, the Florida District Court certified the class and in January 2015, the Florida District Court awarded the class approximately $18,000 . In April 2016, the Partnership appealed the verdict to the Florida Second District Court of Appeals (the “Second DCA”) and, in September 2016, the Second DCA affirmed the verdict without opinion. Prior to the Second DCA’s action in the case, we believed that the likelihood of the Second DCA affirming the Florida District Court’s decision was remote. As a result of the Second DCA’s actions, in September 2016, the Partnership recorded a $14,950 adjustment to its litigation accrual to reflect the full amount of the judgment plus associated interest. In October 2016, the Partnership filed a Motion for Written Opinion and for Rehearing En Banc with the Second DCA. Following denial of such motion, the Partnership satisfied such judgment. Purported Class Action Lawsuits. Between May and October of 2014, more than 35 purported class action lawsuits were filed in multiple jurisdictions against the Partnership/UGI and a competitor by certain of their direct and indirect customers. The class action lawsuits allege, among other things, that the Partnership and its competitor colluded, beginning in 2008, to reduce the fill level of portable propane cylinders from 17 pounds to 15 pounds and combined to persuade their common customer, Walmart Stores, Inc., to accept that fill reduction, resulting in increased cylinder costs to retailers and end-user customers in violation of federal and certain state antitrust laws. The claims seek treble damages, injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees and costs on behalf of the putative classes. On October 16, 2014, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred all of these purported class action cases to the Western Division of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri (“District Court”). In July 2015, the District Court dismissed all claims brought by direct customers. In June 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (“Eighth Circuit”) ruled en banc to reverse the dismissal by the District Court, which had previously been affirmed by a panel of the Eighth Circuit. We are considering the filing of a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court appealing the decision of the Eighth Circuit. In July 2015, the District Court also dismissed all claims brought by the indirect customers other than those for injunctive relief. The indirect customers filed an amended complaint with the District Court claiming injunctive relief and state law claims under Wisconsin, Maine and Vermont law. In September 2016, the District Court dismissed the amended complaint in its entirety. The indirect customers appealed this decision to the Eighth Circuit; such appeal was subject to a stay pending the en banc review of the direct purchasers’ claims. In light of the Eighth Circuit decision with respect to the direct purchaser claims, the briefing schedule in respect of the indirect purchaser appeal will now resume. On July 21, 2016, several new indirect customer plaintiffs filed an antitrust class action lawsuit against the Partnership in the Western District of Missouri. The new indirect customer class action lawsuit was dismissed in September 2016 and certain indirect customer plaintiffs appealed the decision, consolidating their appeal with the indirect customer appeal still pending in the Eighth Circuit. We are unable to reasonably estimate the impact, if any, arising from such litigation. We believe we have strong defenses to the claims and intend to vigorously defend against them. In addition to the matters described above, there are other pending claims and legal actions arising in the normal course of our businesses. Although we cannot predict the final results of these pending claims and legal actions, we believe, after consultation with counsel, that the final outcome of these matters will not have a material effect on our financial statements. |
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] | |
Fair Value Measurements | Note 7 — Fair Value Measurements Derivative Instruments The following table presents on a gross basis our derivative assets and liabilities, including both current and noncurrent portions, that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis within the fair value hierarchy, as of June 30, 2017 , September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 : Asset (Liability) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total June 30, 2017: Assets: Propane contracts $ — $ 6,369 $ — $ 6,369 Liabilities: Propane contracts $ — $ (6,481 ) $ — $ (6,481 ) September 30, 2016: Assets: Propane contracts $ — $ 13,522 $ — $ 13,522 Liabilities: Propane contracts $ — $ (4,779 ) $ — $ (4,779 ) June 30, 2016: Assets: Propane contracts $ — $ 14,063 $ — $ 14,063 Liabilities: Propane contracts $ — $ (9,729 ) $ — $ (9,729 ) The fair values of our non-exchange traded commodity derivative contracts included in Level 2 are based upon indicative price quotations available through brokers, industry price publications or recent market transactions and related market indicators. For commodity option contracts not traded on an exchange, we use a Black Scholes option pricing model that considers time value and volatility of the underlying commodity. Other Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of other financial instruments included in current assets and current liabilities (except for current maturities of long-term debt) approximate their fair values because of their short-term nature. We estimate the fair value of long-term debt by using current market prices and by discounting future cash flows using rates available for similar type debt (Level 2). The carrying amount and estimated fair value of our long-term debt (including current maturities but excluding unamortized debt issuance costs) at June 30, 2017 , September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 were as follows: June 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 Carrying amount $ 2,611,981 $ 2,360,434 $ 2,718,085 Estimated fair value $ 2,667,681 $ 2,483,565 $ 2,774,520 Financial instruments other than derivative instruments, such as short-term investments and trade accounts receivable, could expose us to concentrations of credit risk. We limit credit risk from short-term investments by investing only in investment-grade commercial paper, money market mutual funds, securities guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies and FDIC insured bank deposits. The credit risk arising from concentrations of trade accounts receivable is limited because we have a large customer base that extends across many different U.S. markets. |
Derivative Instruments and Hedg
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities | Note 8 — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities The Partnership is exposed to certain market risks associated with its ongoing business operations. Management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments, among other things, to manage these risks. The primary risk managed by derivative instruments is commodity price risk. Although we use derivative financial and commodity instruments to reduce market risk associated with forecasted transactions, we do not use derivative financial and commodity instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The use of derivative instruments is controlled by our risk management and credit policies which govern, among other things, the derivative instruments the Partnership can use, counterparty credit limits and contract authorization limits. Although our commodity derivative instruments extend over a number of years, a significant portion of our commodity derivative instruments economically hedge commodity price risk during the next twelve months. Commodity Price Risk In order to manage market risk associated with the Partnership’s fixed-price programs, the Partnership uses over-the-counter derivative commodity instruments, principally price swap contracts. In addition, the Partnership uses over-the-counter price swap and option contracts to reduce propane price volatility associated with a portion of forecasted propane purchases. In addition, the Partnership from time to time enters into price swap and put option agreements to reduce the effects of short-term commodity price volatility . At June 30, 2017 , September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 , total volumes associated with propane commodity derivatives totaled 213.8 million gallons, 245.4 million gallons and 259.4 million gallons, respectively. At June 30, 2017 , the maximum period over which we are economically hedging propane market price risk is 27 months . Derivative Instruments Credit Risk The Partnership is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative financial and commodity instruments. Our counterparties principally comprise major energy companies and major U.S. financial institutions. We maintain credit policies with regard to our counterparties that we believe reduce overall credit risk. These policies include evaluating and monitoring our counterparties’ financial condition, including their credit ratings, and entering into agreements with counterparties that govern credit limits. Certain of these agreements call for the posting of collateral by the counterparty or by the Partnership in the forms of letters of credit, parental guarantees or cash. Although we have concentrations of credit risk associated with derivative instruments held by certain derivative instrument counterparties, the maximum amount of loss due to credit risk that we would incur if these counterparties failed to perform according to the terms of their contracts, based upon the gross fair values of the derivative instruments, was not material at June 30, 2017 . Certain of our derivative contracts have credit-risk-related contingent features that may require the posting of additional collateral in the event of a downgrade in the Partnership’s debt rating. At June 30, 2017 , if the credit-risk-related contingent features were triggered, the amount of collateral required to be posted would not be material. Offsetting Derivative Assets and Liabilities Derivative assets and liabilities (and cash collateral received and pledged) are presented net by counterparty on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets if the right of offset exists. Our derivative instruments comprise over-the-counter transactions. Over-the-counter contracts are bilateral contracts that are transacted directly with a third party. Certain over-the-counter contracts contain contractual rights of offset through master netting arrangements and contract default provisions. In addition, the contracts are subject to conditional rights of offset through counterparty nonperformance, insolvency or other conditions. In general, most of our over-the-counter transactions are subject to collateral requirements. Types of collateral generally include cash or letters of credit. Cash collateral paid by us to our over-the-counter derivative counterparties, if any, is reflected in the table below to offset derivative liabilities. Cash collateral received by us from our over-the-counter derivative counterparties, if any, is reflected in the table below to offset derivative assets. Certain other accounts receivable and accounts payable balances recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets with our derivative counterparties are not included in the table below but could reduce our net exposure to such counterparties because such balances are subject to master netting or similar arrangements. Fair Value of Derivative Instruments The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities by type, as well as the effects of offsetting, as of June 30, 2017 , September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 : June 30, September 30, June 30, Derivative assets not designated as hedging instruments: Propane contracts $ 6,369 $ 13,522 $ 14,063 Total derivative assets — gross 6,369 13,522 14,063 Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet (4,010 ) (4,362 ) (4,204 ) Total derivative assets — net $ 2,359 $ 9,160 $ 9,859 Derivative liabilities not designated as hedging instruments: Propane contracts $ (6,481 ) $ (4,779 ) $ (9,729 ) Total derivative liabilities — gross (6,481 ) (4,779 ) (9,729 ) Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet 4,010 4,362 4,204 Total derivative liabilities — net $ (2,471 ) $ (417 ) $ (5,525 ) Effect of Derivative Instruments The following tables provide information on the effects of derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 : Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income Location of Gain (Loss) Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: Propane contracts $ (2,744 ) $ 20,409 Cost of sales — propane Gain Recognized in Income Location of Gain Nine Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: Propane contracts $ 18,650 $ 4,579 Cost of sales — propane We are also a party to a number of contracts that have elements of a derivative instrument. These contracts include, among others, binding purchase orders, contracts that provide for the purchase and delivery of propane and service contracts that require the counterparty to provide commodity storage or transportation service to meet our normal sales commitments. Although certain of these contracts have the requisite elements of a derivative instrument, these contracts qualify for NPNS accounting under GAAP because they provide for the delivery of products or services in quantities that are expected to be used in the normal course of operating our business and the price in the contract is based on an underlying that is directly associated with the price of the product or service being purchased or sold. |
Related Party Transactions
Related Party Transactions | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Related Party Transactions [Abstract] | |
Related Party Transactions | Note 9 — Related Party Transactions Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement and a management services agreement, the General Partner is entitled to reimbursement for all direct and indirect expenses incurred or payments it makes on behalf of the Partnership. These costs, which totaled $131,501 and $129,773 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively, and $428,919 and $431,314 for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively, include employee compensation and benefit expenses of employees of the General Partner and general and administrative expenses. UGI provides certain financial and administrative services to the General Partner. UGI bills the General Partner monthly for all direct and indirect corporate expenses incurred in connection with providing these services and the General Partner is reimbursed by the Partnership for these expenses. The allocation of indirect UGI corporate expenses to the Partnership utilizes a weighted, three-component formula based on the relative percentage of the Partnership’s revenues, operating expenses and net assets employed to the total of such items for all UGI operating subsidiaries for which general and administrative services are provided. The General Partner believes that this allocation method is reasonable and equitable to the Partnership. Such corporate expenses totaled $4,173 and $4,392 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively, and $13,554 and $13,784 for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. In addition, UGI and certain of its subsidiaries provide office space, stop loss medical coverage and automobile liability insurance to the Partnership. The costs incurred related to these items during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , were not material. From time to time, AmeriGas OLP purchases propane on an as needed basis from UGI Energy Services, LLC (“Energy Services”). The price of the purchases is generally based on the market price at the time of purchase. There were no purchases of propane by AmeriGas OLP from Energy Services during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 . In addition, the Partnership sells propane to affiliates of UGI. Sales of propane to affiliates of UGI during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were not material. |
Summary of Significant Accoun16
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Principles of Consolidation | Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AmeriGas Partners, its majority-owned subsidiary AmeriGas OLP, and its 100% -owned finance subsidiaries AmeriGas Finance Corp., AmeriGas Eagle Finance Corp., AP Eagle Finance Corp., and AmeriGas Finance LLC. AmeriGas Partners and AmeriGas OLP are under the common control of the General Partner. The General Partner of AmeriGas OLP, which is also the General Partner of AmeriGas Partners, makes all decisions for AmeriGas OLP; limited partners of AmeriGas OLP do not have the ability to remove the General Partner or participate in the decision-making for AmeriGas OLP. The accounts of AmeriGas OLP are included based upon the determination that AmeriGas Partners has a controlling financial interest in and is the primary beneficiary of AmeriGas OLP. |
Allocation of Net Income (Loss) | Allocation of Net Income (Loss) . Net income (loss) attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. for partners’ capital and statement of operations presentation purposes is allocated to the General Partner and the limited partners in accordance with their respective ownership percentages after giving effect to amounts distributed to the General Partner in excess of its 1% general partner interest in AmeriGas Partners based on its incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”) under the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AmeriGas Partners, L.P., as amended (“Partnership Agreement”). |
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit | Net Income (Loss) Per Unit. Income (loss) per limited partner unit is computed in accordance with GAAP regarding the application of the two-class method for determining income (loss) per unit for master limited partnerships (“MLPs”) when IDRs are present. The two-class method requires that income per limited partner unit be calculated as if all earnings for the period were distributed and requires a separate calculation for each quarter- and year-to-date period. In periods when our net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners exceeds our Available Cash, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, and is above certain levels, the calculation according to the two-class method results in an increased allocation of undistributed earnings to the General Partner. Generally, in periods when our Available Cash in respect of the quarter- or year-to-date periods exceeds our net income (loss) attributable to AmeriGas Partners, the calculation according to the two-class method results in an allocation of earnings to the General Partner greater than its relative ownership interest in the Partnership (or in the case of a net loss attributable to AmeriGas Partners, an allocation of such net loss to the Common Unitholders greater than their relative ownership interest in the Partnership). |
Derivative Instruments | Derivative Instruments. Derivative instruments are reported on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair values, unless the derivative instruments qualify for the normal purchase and normal sale (“NPNS”) exception under GAAP. The accounting for changes in fair value depends upon the purpose of the derivative instrument and whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. For the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , none of our derivative instruments were designated as hedges under GAAP. Changes in the fair values of commodity derivative instruments for all periods presented are reflected in “Cost of sales — propane” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Cash flows from derivative instruments are included in cash flows from operating activities. |
Deferred Debt Issuance Costs | Deferred Debt Issuance Costs. During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016, we adopted new accounting guidance regarding the classification of deferred debt issuance costs. Deferred debt issuance costs associated with long-term debt are reflected as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of such debt. Deferred debt issuance costs associated with line of credit facilities continue to be classified as “ Other assets ” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
Environmental Matters | Environmental Matters. We are subject to environmental laws and regulations intended to mitigate or remove the effects of past operations and improve or maintain the quality of the environment. These laws and regulations require the removal or remedy of the effect on the environment of the disposal or release of certain specified hazardous substances at current or former operating sites. Environmental reserves are accrued when assessments indicate that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. Amounts recorded as environmental liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets represent our best estimate of costs expected to be incurred or, if no best estimate can be made, the minimum liability associated with a range of expected environmental investigation and remediation costs. Our estimated liability for environmental contamination is reduced to reflect anticipated participation of other responsible parties but is not reduced for possible recovery from insurance carriers. In those instances for which the amount and timing of cash payments associated with environmental investigation and cleanup are reliably determinable, we discount such liabilities to reflect the time value of money. We intend to pursue recovery of incurred costs through all appropriate means. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and costs. These estimates are based on management’s knowledge of current events, historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results may be different from these estimates and assumptions. |
Reclassifications | Reclassifications. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-period presentation. |
Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted | Adoption of New Accounting Standards Consolidation. Effective October 1, 2016, the Partnership adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-02, “Amendments to Consolidation Analysis” and ASU No. 2016-17, “Interest Held through Related Parties That Are under Common Control.” These ASUs provide new accounting guidance regarding whether a reporting entity should consolidate certain types of legal entities including variable interest entities (“VIEs”). Among other things, the new guidance affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs and requires that, under ASU 2015-02, if a single decision maker and its related parties are under common control, the single decision maker consider indirect interests in the entity held through these related parties to be the equivalent of direct interests, in their entirety. ASU 2016-07 amended the guidance in ASU 2015-02 to provide that such indirect interests be considered the equivalent of direct interests, on a proportionate basis. The adoption of this new guidance did not impact our consolidated financial statements. Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted Goodwill Impairment. In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” Under the new accounting guidance, an entity will no longer determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Instead, an entity will perform its goodwill impairment tests by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity will recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value but not to exceed the total amount of the goodwill of the reporting unit. The provisions of the new accounting guidance are required to be applied prospectively. The new accounting guidance is effective for the Partnership for goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 (Fiscal 2021). Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Partnership expects to adopt the new guidance in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2017. Cash Flow Classification. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” This ASU provides guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (Fiscal 2019). Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in the ASU should generally be adopted on a retrospective basis. The Partnership is in the process of assessing the impact on its financial statements from the adoption of the new guidance and determining the period in which the new guidance will be adopted. Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases." This ASU amends existing guidance to require entities that lease assets to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases on the balance sheet. The new guidance also requires additional disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows from leases. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 (Fiscal 2020). Early adoption is permitted. Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The Partnership is in the process of assessing the impact on its financial statements from the adoption of the new guidance and determining the period in which the new guidance will be adopted but anticipates an increase in the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. Revenue Recognition. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The guidance provided under this ASU, as amended, supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance included in the ASC. The standard requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance is effective for the Partnership for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (Fiscal 2019) and allows for either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption. The Partnership has not yet selected a transition method and is in the process of assessing the impact on its financial statements from the adoption of the new guidance. |
Summary of Significant Accoun17
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Schedule of Income Per Limited Partner Unit | The following table sets forth reconciliations of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted income per limited partner unit computations: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended 2017 2016 2017 2016 Net (loss) income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. $ (46,752 ) $ (33,069 ) $ 180,290 $ 293,812 Adjust for general partner share and theoretical distributions of net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. to the general partner in accordance with the two-class method for MLPs (10,862 ) (10,101 ) (34,908 ) (33,039 ) Common Unitholders’ interest in net (loss) income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. under the two-class method for MLPs $ (57,614 ) $ (43,170 ) $ 145,382 $ 260,773 Weighted average Common Units outstanding — basic (thousands) 93,009 92,960 92,993 92,945 Potentially dilutive Common Units (thousands) — — 52 74 Weighted average Common Units outstanding — diluted (thousands) 93,009 92,960 93,045 93,019 |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Components of Goodwill and Intangible Assets | The Partnership’s goodwill and intangible assets comprise the following: June 30, September 30, June 30, Goodwill (not subject to amortization) $ 2,002,046 $ 1,978,981 $ 1,978,894 Intangible assets: Customer relationships and noncompete agreements $ 536,894 $ 520,180 $ 529,739 Accumulated amortization (220,100 ) (191,805 ) (192,210 ) Intangible assets, net (definite-lived) 316,794 328,375 337,529 Trademarks and tradenames (indefinite-lived) 82,944 82,944 82,944 Total intangible assets, net $ 399,738 $ 411,319 $ 420,473 |
Debt (Tables)
Debt (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Debt Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Early Repayments of Debt | In connection with the early repayments of the Partnership’s Senior Notes, during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , the Partnership recognized losses which are reflected in “Loss on extinguishments of debt” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and comprise the following: Three Months Ended June 30, Nine Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 2017 2016 Early redemption premiums $ 3,588 $ 30,338 $ 51,253 $ 30,338 Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs 846 6,748 8,476 6,748 Loss on extinguishments of debt $ 4,434 $ 37,086 $ 59,729 $ 37,086 |
Fair Value Measurements (Tables
Fair Value Measurements (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] | |
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis | The following table presents on a gross basis our derivative assets and liabilities, including both current and noncurrent portions, that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis within the fair value hierarchy, as of June 30, 2017 , September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 : Asset (Liability) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total June 30, 2017: Assets: Propane contracts $ — $ 6,369 $ — $ 6,369 Liabilities: Propane contracts $ — $ (6,481 ) $ — $ (6,481 ) September 30, 2016: Assets: Propane contracts $ — $ 13,522 $ — $ 13,522 Liabilities: Propane contracts $ — $ (4,779 ) $ — $ (4,779 ) June 30, 2016: Assets: Propane contracts $ — $ 14,063 $ — $ 14,063 Liabilities: Propane contracts $ — $ (9,729 ) $ — $ (9,729 ) |
Carrying Amount and Estimated Fair Value of Long-term Debt | The carrying amount and estimated fair value of our long-term debt (including current maturities but excluding unamortized debt issuance costs) at June 30, 2017 , September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 were as follows: June 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 Carrying amount $ 2,611,981 $ 2,360,434 $ 2,718,085 Estimated fair value $ 2,667,681 $ 2,483,565 $ 2,774,520 |
Derivative Instruments and He21
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Components of Fair Value of Derivative Assets and Liabilities | The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities by type, as well as the effects of offsetting, as of June 30, 2017 , September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 : June 30, September 30, June 30, Derivative assets not designated as hedging instruments: Propane contracts $ 6,369 $ 13,522 $ 14,063 Total derivative assets — gross 6,369 13,522 14,063 Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet (4,010 ) (4,362 ) (4,204 ) Total derivative assets — net $ 2,359 $ 9,160 $ 9,859 Derivative liabilities not designated as hedging instruments: Propane contracts $ (6,481 ) $ (4,779 ) $ (9,729 ) Total derivative liabilities — gross (6,481 ) (4,779 ) (9,729 ) Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet 4,010 4,362 4,204 Total derivative liabilities — net $ (2,471 ) $ (417 ) $ (5,525 ) |
Components of Derivative Instruments Gain (Loss) In Statement of Operations | The following tables provide information on the effects of derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 : Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income Location of Gain (Loss) Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: Propane contracts $ (2,744 ) $ 20,409 Cost of sales — propane Gain Recognized in Income Location of Gain Nine Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: Propane contracts $ 18,650 $ 4,579 Cost of sales — propane |
Nature of Operations (Details)
Nature of Operations (Details) | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017employeestate | |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
Number of states in which the company has market share | state | 50 |
General Partners Interest | |
Number of employees of the AmeriGas Partners and the Operating Partnership | employee | 0 |
AmeriGas Propane Inc Partnership Interest in AmeriGas Partners | |
General Partners Interest | |
General partners ownership interest (as a percent) | 1.00% |
AmeriGas OLP | |
General Partners Interest | |
General partners ownership interest (as a percent) | 1.01% |
Limited partner interest held by AmeriGas Partners in AmeriGas OLP (as a percent) | 98.99% |
Summary of Significant Accoun23
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Principles of Consolidation (Details) | Jun. 30, 2017 |
AmeriGas Finance Corp., AP Eagle Finance Corp. and AmeriGas Finance LLC | |
Investment | |
Ownership interest percentage | 100.00% |
Summary of Significant Accoun24
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Allocation of Net Income (Loss) (Details) | 9 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
AmeriGas Propane Inc Partnership Interest in AmeriGas Partners | |
Investment | |
General partners ownership interest (as a percent) | 1.00% |
Summary of Significant Accoun25
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Schedule of Income Per Limited Partner Unit (Details) - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ||||
Net (loss) income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. | $ (46,752) | $ (33,069) | $ 180,290 | $ 293,812 |
Adjust for general partner share and theoretical distributions of net income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. to the general partner in accordance with the two-class method for MLPs | (10,862) | (10,101) | (34,908) | (33,039) |
Common Unitholders’ interest in net (loss) income attributable to AmeriGas Partners, L.P. under the two-class method for MLPs | $ (57,614) | $ (43,170) | $ 145,382 | $ 260,773 |
Weighted average Common Units outstanding—basic (in units) | 93,009 | 92,960 | 92,993 | 92,945 |
Potentially dilutive Common Units (in units) | 0 | 0 | 52 | 74 |
Weighted average Common Units outstanding—diluted (in units) | 93,009 | 92,960 | 93,045 | 93,019 |
Summary of Significant Accoun26
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Net Income (Loss) Per Unit (Details) - $ / shares | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ||||
Dilutive effect of theoretical distributions of net income on earnings (in usd per unit) | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ (0.01) | $ (0.03) |
Summary of Significant Accoun27
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Deferred Debt Issuance Costs (Details) $ in Thousands | Jun. 30, 2016USD ($) |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Deferred debt issuance costs | $ 30,480 |
Summary of Significant Accoun28
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Correction of Prior Period Error (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | |
Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments Restatement [Line Items] | ||||
Increase in other operating expense | $ (8,294) | $ (6,041) | $ (10,787) | $ (22,079) |
Decrease in depreciation | $ (35,482) | $ (35,668) | (103,891) | $ (110,807) |
Restatement Adjustment | Correction of Error in Accounting for Gains on Sales of Fixed Assets | ||||
Error Corrections and Prior Period Adjustments Restatement [Line Items] | ||||
Increase in other operating expense | 8,847 | |||
Decrease in depreciation | $ 1,162 |
Goodwill And Intangible Asset29
Goodwill And Intangible Assets - Components of Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Jun. 30, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2016 |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract] | |||
Goodwill (not subject to amortization) | $ 2,002,046 | $ 1,978,981 | $ 1,978,894 |
Intangible assets: | |||
Customer relationships and noncompete agreements | 536,894 | 520,180 | 529,739 |
Accumulated amortization | (220,100) | (191,805) | (192,210) |
Intangible assets, net (definite-lived) | 316,794 | 328,375 | 337,529 |
Trademarks and tradenames (indefinite-lived) | 82,944 | 82,944 | 82,944 |
Total intangible assets, net | $ 399,738 | $ 411,319 | $ 420,473 |
Goodwill and Intangible Asset30
Goodwill and Intangible Assets - Narrative (Details) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | |
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets | ||||
Amortization expense of intangible assets | $ 9,466,000 | $ 9,545,000 | $ 28,295,000 | $ 28,646,000 |
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net, Amortization Expense, Fiscal Year Maturity | ||||
Remainder of Fiscal 2017 | 9,642,000 | 9,642,000 | ||
Fiscal 2,018 | 38,248,000 | 38,248,000 | ||
Fiscal 2,019 | 37,024,000 | 37,024,000 | ||
Fiscal 2,020 | 35,803,000 | 35,803,000 | ||
Fiscal 2,021 | 33,968,000 | 33,968,000 | ||
Cost of Sales | ||||
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets | ||||
Amortization expense of intangible assets | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Debt - Narrative (Details)
Debt - Narrative (Details) - USD ($) | 1 Months Ended | ||
May 31, 2017 | Feb. 28, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 | |
Senior Notes | 5.50% Senior Notes due May 2025 | |||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Debt issued | $ 700,000,000 | ||
Stated interest rate | 5.50% | ||
Senior Notes | 7.00% Senior Notes | |||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Stated interest rate | 7.00% | 7.00% | 7.00% |
Aggregate principal balance of debt repaid | $ 102,512,000 | $ 378,340,000 | $ 499,970,000 |
Senior Notes | 5.75% Senior Notes due May 2027 | |||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Debt issued | $ 525,000,000 | ||
Stated interest rate | 5.75% | ||
AmeriGas Finance Corp. | |||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Ownership interest percentage | 100.00% |
Debt - Early Repayments (Detail
Debt - Early Repayments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | |
Extinguishment of Debt [Line Items] | ||||
Loss on extinguishments of debt | $ 4,434 | $ 37,086 | $ 59,729 | $ 37,086 |
Senior Notes | 7.00% Senior Notes | ||||
Extinguishment of Debt [Line Items] | ||||
Early redemption premiums | 3,588 | 30,338 | 51,253 | 30,338 |
Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs | 846 | 6,748 | 8,476 | 6,748 |
Loss on extinguishments of debt | $ 4,434 | $ 37,086 | $ 59,729 | $ 37,086 |
Commitments and Contingencies (
Commitments and Contingencies (Details) $ in Thousands | 1 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Sep. 30, 2016USD ($) | Jan. 31, 2015USD ($) | Oct. 31, 2014lawsuit | Jun. 30, 2017USD ($)lb | Mar. 31, 2017USD ($) | |
Loss Contingencies | |||||
Amount awarded | $ 18,000 | ||||
Adjustment to litigation accrual | $ 14,950 | ||||
Class action lawsuits (more than) | lawsuit | 35 | ||||
FTC Cylinder Investigation | |||||
Loss Contingencies | |||||
Amount of propane in cylinders before reduction (in pounds) | lb | 17 | ||||
Amount of propane in cylinders after reduction (in pounds) | lb | 15 | ||||
AmeriGas OLP | DEC Remediation Plan | Saranac Lake, New York | |||||
Loss Contingencies | |||||
Estimated remediation plan cost | $ 27,000 | ||||
Liability accrued for potential remediation costs | $ 7,545 |
Fair Value Measurements - Finan
Fair Value Measurements - Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities at Fair Value On a Recurring Basis (Details) - Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring - Propane Contracts - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Jun. 30, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2016 |
Assets: | |||
Derivative Assets | $ 6,369 | $ 13,522 | $ 14,063 |
Liabilities: | |||
Derivative Liabilities | (6,481) | (4,779) | (9,729) |
Level 1 | |||
Assets: | |||
Derivative Assets | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Liabilities: | |||
Derivative Liabilities | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Level 2 | |||
Assets: | |||
Derivative Assets | 6,369 | 13,522 | 14,063 |
Liabilities: | |||
Derivative Liabilities | (6,481) | (4,779) | (9,729) |
Level 3 | |||
Assets: | |||
Derivative Assets | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Liabilities: | |||
Derivative Liabilities | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Fair Value Measurements - Other
Fair Value Measurements - Other Financial Instruments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Jun. 30, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2016 |
Carrying amount | |||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | |||
Long-term debt | $ 2,611,981 | $ 2,360,434 | $ 2,718,085 |
Estimated fair value | |||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | |||
Long-term debt | $ 2,667,681 | $ 2,483,565 | $ 2,774,520 |
Derivative Instruments and He36
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Narrative (Details) - gal gal in Millions | 9 Months Ended | ||
Jun. 30, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2016 | |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract] | |||
Volume of commodity derivative (gallons) | 213.8 | 245.4 | 259.4 |
Maximum period of price risk cash flow hedging (in months) | 27 months |
Derivative Instruments and He37
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Components of Fair Value of Derivative Assets and Liabilities (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Jun. 30, 2017 | Sep. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2016 |
Derivative assets not designated as hedging instruments: | |||
Total derivative assets — gross | $ 6,369 | $ 13,522 | $ 14,063 |
Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet | (4,010) | (4,362) | (4,204) |
Total derivative assets — net | 2,359 | 9,160 | 9,859 |
Derivative liabilities not designated as hedging instruments: | |||
Total derivative liabilities — gross | (6,481) | (4,779) | (9,729) |
Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet | 4,010 | 4,362 | 4,204 |
Total derivative liabilities — net | (2,471) | (417) | (5,525) |
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument | Propane contracts | |||
Derivative assets not designated as hedging instruments: | |||
Total derivative assets — gross | 6,369 | 13,522 | 14,063 |
Derivative liabilities not designated as hedging instruments: | |||
Total derivative liabilities — gross | $ (6,481) | $ (4,779) | $ (9,729) |
Derivative Instruments and He38
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Components of Derivative Instruments Gain Loss in Statement of Operations (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | |
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument | Propane contracts | Cost of sales — propane | ||||
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) | ||||
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income | $ (2,744) | $ 20,409 | $ 18,650 | $ 4,579 |
Related Party Transactions (Det
Related Party Transactions (Details) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | Jun. 30, 2017 | Jun. 30, 2016 | |
General Partner | Reimbursed Expenses or Payments | ||||
Related Party Transaction | ||||
Related party costs and expenses | $ 131,501,000 | $ 129,773,000 | $ 428,919,000 | $ 431,314,000 |
General Partner | UGI Corp | General and Administrative Services | ||||
Related Party Transaction | ||||
Related party costs and expenses | 4,173,000 | 4,392,000 | 13,554,000 | 13,784,000 |
Affiliated Entity | Energy Services | Propane Purchases | ||||
Related Party Transaction | ||||
Related party costs and expenses | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 |