Exhibit 99.1
HERITAGE OPERATING, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES and
TITAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants | 2 | |||
Combined Balance Sheets – December 31, 2010 and 2009 | 3 | |||
Combined Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income – For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 | 4 | |||
Combined Statements of Partners’ Capital – For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 | 5 | |||
Combined Statements of Cash Flows – For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 | 6 | |||
Notes to Combined Financial Statements | 7 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Partners
Heritage Operating, L.P.
Titan Energy Partners, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of Heritage Operating, L.P. and subsidiaries, and Titan Energy Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries (both Delaware limited partnerships and wholly-owned subsidiaries of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.) (collectively, “the Partnerships”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related combined statements of operations and comprehensive income, partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnerships’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnerships’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Heritage Operating, L.P. and subsidiaries, and Titan Energy Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
November 21, 2011
2
HERITAGE OPERATING, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES and
TITAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 31,141 | $ | 43,894 | ||||
Marketable securities | 2,020 | 6,044 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts | 151,098 | 136,673 | ||||||
Accounts receivable from related companies | 70,930 | 21,867 | ||||||
Inventories | 91,015 | 77,594 | ||||||
Price risk management assets | 6,864 | 11,791 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 15,686 | 16,020 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total current assets | 368,754 | 313,883 | ||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | 1,184,373 | 1,124,496 | ||||||
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION | (394,451 | ) | (327,627 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
789,922 | 796,869 | |||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAX BENEFIT | 2,944 | 4,500 | ||||||
GOODWILL | 613,106 | 603,975 | ||||||
INTANGIBLES AND OTHER ASSETS, net | 161,710 | 164,161 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total assets | $ | 1,936,436 | $ | 1,883,388 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 49,546 | $ | 51,940 | ||||
Accounts payable to related companies | 109,143 | 57,778 | ||||||
Customer advances and deposits | 70,989 | 71,083 | ||||||
Accrued wages and benefits | 20,657 | 18,197 | ||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities | 37,131 | 39,328 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 35,265 | 40,887 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total current liabilities | 322,731 | 279,213 | ||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities | 77,403 | 119,747 | ||||||
OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | 2,720 | 2,720 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 7) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
402,854 | 401,680 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL: | ||||||||
Limited Partners | 1,526,276 | 1,468,157 | ||||||
General Partners | — | — | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 7,306 | 13,551 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total partners’ capital | 1,533,582 | 1,481,708 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ | 1,936,436 | $ | 1,883,388 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.
3
HERITAGE OPERATING, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES and
TITAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
REVENUES: | ||||||||||||
Retail fuel | $ | 1,314,973 | $ | 1,190,523 | $ | 1,514,599 | ||||||
Wholesale fuel | 8,331 | 7,143 | 14,684 | |||||||||
Other | 106,883 | 103,823 | 110,917 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total revenues | 1,430,187 | 1,301,489 | 1,640,200 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||
Cost of products sold - retail fuel (excluding depreciation) | 752,926 | 574,854 | 1,014,068 | |||||||||
Cost of products sold - wholesale fuel (excluding depreciation) | 7,841 | 6,479 | 13,375 | |||||||||
Cost of products sold - other (excluding depreciation) | 21,816 | 21,148 | 24,655 | |||||||||
Operating expenses | 343,022 | 347,761 | 354,539 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 82,640 | 84,203 | 80,311 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 45,937 | 41,941 | 40,727 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total costs and expenses | 1,254,182 | 1,076,386 | 1,527,675 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
OPERATING INCOME | 176,005 | 225,103 | 112,525 | |||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): | ||||||||||||
Affiliated interest | 1,636 | 617 | (2,942 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense | (11,954 | ) | (16,046 | ) | (19,861 | ) | ||||||
Gains (losses) on disposal of assets | (1,027 | ) | 1,074 | (1,296 | ) | |||||||
Other, net | 303 | 534 | (2,635 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE | 164,963 | 211,282 | 85,791 | |||||||||
Income tax expense | 1,654 | 1,998 | 418 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
NET INCOME | 163,309 | 209,284 | 85,373 | |||||||||
Reclassification to earnings of losses on available-for-sale securities | — | — | 1,403 | |||||||||
Change in value of available-for-sale securities | (4,023 | ) | 4,941 | (1,888 | ) | |||||||
Reclassification to earnings of gains and losses on derivative instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges | (11,724 | ) | (4,022 | ) | — | |||||||
Change in value of derivative instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges | 9,502 | 12,632 | — | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
(6,245 | ) | 13,551 | (485 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | $ | 157,064 | $ | 222,835 | $ | 84,888 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.
4
HERITAGE OPERATING, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES and
TITAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
(in thousands)
Limited Partners | General Partners | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2008 | $ | 1,322,588 | $ | — | $ | 485 | $ | 1,323,073 | ||||||||
Contribution of units in connection with certain acquisitions | 2,228 | — | — | 2,228 | ||||||||||||
Distributions | (80,000 | ) | — | — | (80,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-cash unit-based compensation | 7,422 | — | — | 7,422 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — | — | (485 | ) | (485 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income | 85,373 | — | — | 85,373 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 | $ | 1,337,611 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,337,611 | ||||||||
Distributions | (81,697 | ) | — | — | (81,697 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-cash unit-based compensation | 2,959 | — | — | 2,959 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | — | — | 13,551 | 13,551 | ||||||||||||
Net income | 209,284 | — | — | 209,284 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 | $ | 1,468,157 | $ | — | $ | 13,551 | $ | 1,481,708 | ||||||||
Distributions | (110,000 | ) | — | — | (110,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-cash unit-based compensation | 4,810 | — | — | 4,810 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — | — | (6,245 | ) | (6,245 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income | 163,309 | — | — | 163,309 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 | $ | 1,526,276 | $ | — | $ | 7,306 | $ | 1,533,582 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.
5
HERITAGE OPERATING, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES and
TITAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 163,309 | $ | 209,284 | $ | 85,373 | ||||||
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 82,640 | 84,203 | 80,311 | |||||||||
Amortization of finance costs charged to interest | 500 | 547 | 582 | |||||||||
Losses on write down of marketable securities | — | — | 1,403 | |||||||||
Provision for losses on accounts receivable | 3,727 | 2,993 | 8,015 | |||||||||
(Gains) losses on disposal of assets | 1,027 | (1,074 | ) | 1,296 | ||||||||
Non-cash unit-based compensation expense | 4,810 | 2,959 | 7,422 | |||||||||
Other non-cash | 1,142 | (17 | ) | (55 | ) | |||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | (17,976 | ) | 7,112 | 32,180 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable from related companies | (577 | ) | 16,797 | 7,107 | ||||||||
Inventories | (9,108 | ) | (5,026 | ) | 18,571 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (2,870 | ) | 12,138 | (11,678 | ) | |||||||
Intangibles and other assets | 158 | 58 | (1,038 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts payable | (780 | ) | 4,788 | (41,962 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable to related companies | 51,365 | (1,829 | ) | 8,015 | ||||||||
Customer advances and deposits | (175 | ) | (16,546 | ) | 16,440 | |||||||
Accrued wages and benefits | 2,451 | (11,276 | ) | 10,637 | ||||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities | (2,883 | ) | (3,029 | ) | (2,860 | ) | ||||||
Other non-current liabilities | — | (128 | ) | (102 | ) | |||||||
Price risk management assets and liabilities, net | 2,706 | (46,603 | ) | 45,211 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 279,466 | 255,351 | 264,868 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (28,107 | ) | (6,306 | ) | (76,247 | ) | ||||||
Capital expenditures | (59,207 | ) | (63,851 | ) | (80,673 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of assets | 5,902 | 7,553 | 4,924 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (81,412 | ) | (62,604 | ) | (151,996 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from borrowings | 2,760 | 16,440 | 74,969 | |||||||||
Proceeds from related company borrowings | 128,760 | 157,910 | 192,182 | |||||||||
Principal payments on debt | (55,082 | ) | (63,049 | ) | (126,445 | ) | ||||||
Principal payments on related company debt | (177,245 | ) | (261,710 | ) | (145,620 | ) | ||||||
Distributions to partners | (110,000 | ) | (81,697 | ) | (80,000 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (210,807 | ) | (232,106 | ) | (84,914 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (12,753 | ) | (39,359 | ) | 27,958 | |||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year | 43,894 | 83,253 | 55,295 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year | $ | 31,141 | $ | 43,894 | $ | 83,253 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt assumed and noncompete agreement notes payable issued in acquisitions | $ | 2,740 | $ | 790 | $ | 5,077 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Debt forgiveness in connection with certain acquisitions | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 9,760 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 11,838 | $ | 15,777 | $ | 19,453 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cash paid for taxes | $ | 2,394 | $ | 2,148 | $ | 5,077 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Contribution of assets from parent in connection with certain acquisitions | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,228 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.
6
HERITAGE OPERATING, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES and
TITAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per unit data)
1. | OPERATIONS AND ORGANIZATION: |
Business Operations
Heritage Operating, L.P. (“HOLP”) and Titan Energy Partners, L.P. (“Titan L.P.”) are both Delaware limited partnerships. HOLP and Titan Propane LLC (“Titan”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Titan L.P., sell propane and propane-related products to residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural customers in the United States. HOLP is also a wholesale propane supplier in the United States.
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (“ETP”) owns a 100% limited partner interest in HOLP and Energy Transfer Partners, GP, L.P. (“ETP GP”) is the General Partner of HOLP with a 0.0% economic interest. ETP owns a 99.99% limited partner interest and a 0.01% general partner interest in Titan L.P. Titan Energy GP, LLC is the General Partner of Titan L.P. Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. (“ETE”) owns ETP GP and approximately 25% of the limited partner units of ETP.
The accompanying combined financial statements include the accounts and operations of HOLP and Titan L.P. and their respective wholly-owned subsidiaries, as follows:
HOLP
• | Heritage Service Corp. - manages the assets generating the non-qualifying income (including income such as derivative gains from trading activities, service income, tank rentals and others) of the operating partnership. |
• | Heritage Energy Resources, L.L.C. (“HER”) - buys and sells financial instruments related to natural gas liquids (“NGLs”). |
Titan L.P.
• | Titan – manages the operational activities for Titan L.P. |
• | Titan Propane Services, Inc. - manages the assets generating the non-qualifying income (including income such as derivative gains from trading activities, service income, tank rentals and others) of the operating partnership. |
HOLP and Titan L.P. and their subsidiaries are collectively referred to in this report as “we”, “us”, “propane operations” or the “Propane Partnerships”.
2. | SIGNIFICANT ACQUISITIONS: |
2010
During the year ended December 31, 2010, we acquired substantially all of the assets of four propane businesses which included H&H Gas and three other smaller companies. We also acquired one production facility for our cylinder exchange business. The aggregate purchase price for these acquisitions totaled $32,038, which included $28,107 of cash paid, net of cash acquired, and liabilities assumed of $3,517. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we also recorded a $414 gain on a bargain purchase. Operating cash flows were primarily used to pay for the acquisitions. The operations of the acquired businesses have been included in the combined statement of operations from their respective acquisition dates.
7
The following table presents the allocation of the acquisition cost to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values for the 2010 acquisitions described above, net of cash acquired:
H&H Gas Acquisition | Other Acquisitions (Aggregated) | |||||||
Accounts receivable | $ | 22 | $ | 154 | ||||
Inventories | 242 | 788 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 67 | 10 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment | 6,044 | 6,383 | ||||||
Intangible assets | 7,334 | 1,863 | ||||||
Goodwill | 8,350 | 781 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total assets acquired | 22,059 | 9,979 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Customer advances and deposits | 41 | 40 | ||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities | 529 | 167 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 1,762 | 978 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total liabilities assumed | 2,332 | 1,185 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net assets acquired | $ | 19,727 | $ | 8,794 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The purchase prices have been allocated based on the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.
We recorded the following intangible assets and goodwill in conjunction with these acquisitions:
H&H Gas Acquisition | Other Acquisitions (Aggregated) | |||||||
Intangible assets: | ||||||||
Noncompete agreements (10 years) | $ | 210 | $ | 268 | ||||
Customer lists (15 years) | 6,018 | 1,081 | ||||||
Non-amortizable intangible assets - Trademarks | 1,106 | 514 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total intangible assets | 7,334 | 1,863 | ||||||
Goodwill | 8,350 | 781 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total intangible assets and goodwill acquired | $ | 15,684 | $ | 2,644 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Goodwill was warranted because these acquisitions enhance our current operations and are expected to reduce costs through synergies with existing operations. This goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Changes to final asset valuation of prior year acquisitions have been included in our combined financial statements, but are not material.
2009
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we acquired substantially all of the assets of three propane businesses. The aggregate purchase price for these acquisitions totaled $6,487, which included $5,234 of cash paid, net of cash acquired, and liabilities assumed of $1,236. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we also recorded a $17 gain on a bargain purchase and paid cash of $1,072 related primarily to purchase price holdbacks from 2008 acquisitions. The cash paid for acquisitions was financed primarily with HOLP’s Senior Revolving Credit Facilities. The operations of the acquired businesses have been included in the combined statement of operations from their respective acquisition dates.
8
The following table presents the allocation of the acquisition cost to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values for the 2009 acquisitions described above, net of cash acquired:
Acquisitions (Aggregated) | ||||
Accounts receivable | $ | 313 | ||
Inventories | 152 | |||
Property, plant, and equipment | 4,631 | |||
Intangible assets | 1,358 | |||
Goodwill | 33 | |||
|
| |||
Total assets acquired | 6,487 | |||
|
| |||
Accounts payable | 380 | |||
Customer advances and deposits | 85 | |||
Accrued and other current liabilities | 66 | |||
Long-term debt | 705 | |||
|
| |||
Total liabilities assumed | 1,236 | |||
|
| |||
Net assets acquired | $ | 5,251 | ||
|
|
The purchase prices have been allocated based on the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.
We recorded the following intangible assets and goodwill in conjunction with these acquisitions:
Acquisitions (Aggregated) | ||||
Intangible assets: | ||||
Noncompete agreements (5 to 7 years) | $ | 188 | ||
Customer lists (15 years) | 848 | |||
Non-amortizable intangible assets - Trademarks | 322 | |||
|
| |||
Total intangible assets | 1,358 | |||
Goodwill | 33 | |||
|
| |||
Total intangible assets and goodwill acquired | $ | 1,391 | ||
|
|
Goodwill was warranted because these acquisitions enhance our current operations and are expected to reduce costs through synergies with existing operations. This goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
2008
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we acquired substantially all of the assets of 20 propane businesses. The aggregate purchase price for these acquisitions totaled $96,400, which included $76,247 of cash paid, net of cash acquired, liabilities assumed of $8,165, a total of 53,893 ETP Common Units issued valued at $2,228 and debt forgiveness of $9,760. The cash paid for acquisitions was financed primarily with ETP’s and HOLP’s Senior Revolving Credit Facilities. The operations of the acquired businesses have been included in the combined statement of operations from their respective acquisition dates.
9
The following table presents the allocation of the acquisition cost to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values for the 2008 acquisitions described above, net of cash acquired:
Acquisitions (Aggregated) | ||||
Accounts receivable | $ | 8,030 | ||
Inventories | 2,977 | |||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 66 | |||
Property, plant, and equipment | 53,132 | |||
Intangible and other assets | 16,849 | |||
Goodwill | 15,346 | |||
|
| |||
Total assets acquired | 96,400 | |||
|
| |||
Customer advances and deposits | 1,095 | |||
Accrued and other current liabilities | 2,222 | |||
Long-term debt | 4,848 | |||
|
| |||
Total liabilities assumed | 8,165 | |||
|
| |||
Net assets acquired | $ | 88,235 | ||
|
|
The purchase prices have been allocated based on the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.
We recorded the following intangible assets and goodwill in conjunction with these acquisitions:
Acquisitions (Aggregated) | ||||
Intangible assets: | ||||
Noncompete agreements (5 to 15 years) | $ | 5,045 | ||
Customer lists (3 to 15 years) | 4,786 | |||
Non-amortizable intangible assets - Trademarks | 5,292 | |||
|
| |||
Total intangible assets | 15,123 | |||
Goodwill | 15,346 | |||
|
| |||
Total intangible assets and goodwill acquired | $ | 30,469 | ||
|
|
Goodwill was warranted because these acquisitions enhance our current operations and are expected to reduce costs through synergies with existing operations. This goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
HOLP previously owned a 50% ownership interest in United Propane Exchange, LLC (“UPX”), a propane cylinder exchange business in metropolitan areas throughout the United States. HOLP purchased the remaining 50% in UPX in January 2008 (included in aggregate acquisitions above) for $17,762 which included $8,002 in cash and debt forgiveness of $9,760. UPX was then fully merged into HOLP. As a result, HOLP ceased the use of equity accounting in January 2008 and the combined financial statements include the operations of the propane cylinder exchange business with HOLP’s 50% equity investment of $13,179 allocated to assets and liabilities at historical cost (a non-cash transaction) and the purchase of the remaining 50% ownership in UPX allocated to the appropriate assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on fair values at the date of acquisition.
3. | ESTIMATES, SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BALANCE SHEET DETAIL: |
Principles of Consolidation and Combination
The combined financial statements of the Propane Partnerships include the accounts of their subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation and combination.
10
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the accrual for and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Some of the significant estimates made by management include, but are not limited to, allowances for doubtful accounts, the fair value of derivative instruments, useful lives for depreciation and amortization, purchase accounting allocations and subsequent realizability of intangible assets, fair value measurements used in goodwill and trademark impairment tests, market value of inventory and contingency reserves. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues for sales of propane and propane appliances, parts, and fittings are recognized at the later of the time of delivery of the product to the customer or the time of sale or installation. Revenue from service labor is recognized upon completion of the service. Tank rent is recognized ratably over the period it is earned. We do not separately charge shipping and handling costs to customers. Our customer base includes residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural customers.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash on hand, demand deposits, and investments with original maturities of three months or less. We consider cash equivalents to include short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
We place our cash deposits and temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial institutions. At times, our cash and cash equivalents may be uninsured or in deposit accounts that exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limit.
Marketable Securities
Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and are reflected as a current asset on the combined balance sheets at fair value. Unrealized holding losses of $4,023, gains of $4,941 and losses of $1,888 were recorded through accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), based on the market value of the securities, for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The change in the securities for the year ended December 31, 2008 includes realized losses of $1,403 reclassed from AOCI due to an other-than-temporary decline in the market value of our available-for-sale securities, which was recorded in other expense. There were no other-than-temporary declines in the market value of our available-for-sale securities during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Accounts Receivable
We grant credit to our customers for the purchase of propane and propane-related products. Accounts receivable are primarily trade accounts receivable arising from our retail and wholesale propane operations and receivables arising from liquids marketing activities. Accounts receivable are recorded at amounts billed to customers less an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects management’s assessment of the realizability of customer accounts, based on the overall creditworthiness of our customers and any specific disputes.
11
Accounts receivable consisted of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Accounts receivable | $ | 157,507 | $ | 143,012 | ||||
Less – allowance for doubtful accounts | (6,409 | ) | (6,339 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total, net | $ | 151,098 | $ | 136,673 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts consisted of the following:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 6,339 | $ | 8,750 | $ | 5,698 | ||||||
Accounts receivable written off, net of recoveries | (3,657 | ) | (5,404 | ) | (4,963 | ) | ||||||
Provision for loss on accounts receivable | 3,727 | 2,993 | 8,015 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Balance, end of year | $ | 6,409 | $ | 6,339 | $ | 8,750 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. The cost of propane inventories is determined using the weighted-average cost of propane delivered to the customer service locations and includes storage fees and inbound freight costs, while the cost of appliances, parts, and fittings is determined by the first-in, first-out method.
Inventories consisted of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Propane | $ | 76,341 | $ | 63,403 | ||||
Appliances, parts and fittings and other | 14,674 | 14,191 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total inventories | $ | 91,015 | $ | 77,594 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs that do not add capacity or extend the useful life are expensed as incurred. Expenditures to refurbish tanks that either extend the useful lives of the tanks or prevent environmental contamination are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining useful life of the tanks. Additionally, we capitalize certain costs directly related to the installation of company-owned tanks, including internal labor costs. When property, plant and equipment are retired or sold, any gain or loss is included in our results of operations.
We review property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. If such a review should indicate that the carrying amount of long-lived assets is not recoverable, we reduce the carrying amount of such assets to fair value. No impairment of long-lived assets was required during the periods presented in these combined financial statements.
12
Components and useful lives of property, plant and equipment were as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Land and improvements | $ | 66,963 | $ | 62,597 | ||||
Buildings and improvements (20 to 40 years) | 75,153 | 69,053 | ||||||
Bulk storage, equipment and facilities (5 to 30 years) | 193,664 | 178,122 | ||||||
Tanks and other equipment (10 to 30 years) | 623,126 | 602,915 | ||||||
Vehicles (3 to 20 years) | 165,173 | 148,014 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures (3 to 10 years) | 28,729 | 21,887 | ||||||
Other (10 years) | 8,149 | 7,135 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
1,160,957 | 1,089,723 | |||||||
Less – Accumulated depreciation | (394,451 | ) | (327,627 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
766,506 | 762,096 | |||||||
Plus – Construction work-in-process | 23,416 | 34,773 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 789,922 | $ | 796,869 | ||||
|
|
|
|
We recognized the following amounts of depreciation expense for the periods presented:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Depreciation expense | $ | 72,681 | $ | 72,376 | $ | 68,341 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. Our annual impairment test is performed as of August 31. No goodwill impairments were recorded for the periods presented in these combined financial statements.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:
Balance, December 31, 2008 | $ | 612,604 | ||
Purchase accounting adjustments | (8,662 | ) | ||
Goodwill acquired | 33 | |||
|
| |||
Balance, December 31, 2009 | $ | 603,975 | ||
Goodwill acquired | 9,131 | |||
|
| |||
Balance, December 31, 2010 | $ | 613,106 | ||
|
|
Goodwill is recorded at the acquisition date based on a preliminary purchase price allocation and generally may be retrospectively adjusted when the purchase price allocation is finalized. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the purchase accounting adjustments relate to final purchase price allocations that were reclassifications between goodwill and intangible assets.
13
Intangibles and Other Assets
Intangibles and other assets are stated at cost net of amortization computed on the straight-line method. We eliminate from our combined balance sheets the gross carrying amount and the related accumulated amortization for any fully amortized intangibles in the year they are fully amortized. Components and useful lives of intangibles and other assets were as follows:
December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | |||||||||||||
Amortizable intangible assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Noncompete agreements (3 to 15 years) | $ | 21,165 | $ | (11,888 | ) | $ | 24,139 | $ | (12,415 | ) | ||||||
Customer lists (15 to 30 years) | 104,802 | (38,250 | ) | 98,470 | (31,983 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total amortizable intangible assets | 125,967 | (50,138 | ) | 122,609 | (44,398 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-amortizable assets - Trademarks | 77,445 | — | 75,825 | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total intangible assets | 203,412 | (50,138 | ) | 198,434 | (44,398 | ) | ||||||||||
Other long-term assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Financing costs (5 to 20 years) | 3,822 | (3,182 | ) | 4,683 | (3,543 | ) | ||||||||||
Other | 7,796 | — | 8,985 | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total intangible and other assets | $ | 215,030 | $ | (53,320 | ) | $ | 212,102 | $ | (47,941 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense of intangible and other assets was as follows:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Reported in depreciation and amortization | $ | 9,959 | $ | 11,827 | $ | 11,970 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Reported in interest expense | $ | 500 | $ | 547 | $ | 582 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:
Years Ending December 31: | ||||
2011 | $ | 10,046 | ||
2012 | 8,991 | |||
2013 | 8,539 | |||
2014 | 8,075 | |||
2015 | 7,513 |
We review amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. If such a review should indicate that the carrying amount of amortizable intangible assets is not recoverable, we reduce the carrying amount of such assets to fair value. We review non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually as of August 31, or more frequently if circumstances dictate. No impairment of intangible assets was required during the periods presented in these combined financial statements.
Asset Retirement Obligation
We have determined that we are obligated by contractual requirements to remove facilities or perform other remediation upon retirement of certain assets. Determination of the amounts to be recognized is based upon numerous estimates and assumptions, including expected settlement dates, future retirement costs, future inflation rates and the credit-adjusted risk-free interest rates. However, management was not able to reasonably measure the fair value of the asset retirement obligations as of December 31, 2010 or 2009 because the settlement dates were indeterminable. We will record an asset retirement obligation in the periods in which management can reasonably determine the settlement dates.
14
Customer Advances and Deposits
We receive deposits or advances from customers as security or prepayments for future propane deliveries. Prepayments and security deposits may also be required when customers exceed their credit limits or do not qualify for open credit.
Accrued and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued and other current liabilities consisted of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Interest payable | $ | 1,271 | $ | 1,655 | ||||
Deferred tank rent | 12,191 | 12,276 | ||||||
Taxes other than income taxes | 10,479 | 9,382 | ||||||
Insurance reserve | 10,170 | 11,051 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 975 | 3,272 | ||||||
Other | 2,045 | 1,692 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total accrued and other current liabilities | $ | 37,131 | $ | 39,328 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value. Assets and liabilities from liquids marketing and price risk management assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value.
Based on the estimated borrowing rates currently available to us for loans with similar terms and average maturities, the aggregate fair value and carrying amount of our debt obligations as of December 31, 2010 was $125,372 and $112,668, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 the aggregate fair value and carrying amount of long-term debt was $176,354 and $160,634, respectively.
We have marketable securities and commodity derivatives that are accounted for as assets and liabilities at fair value in our combined balance sheets. We determine the fair value of our assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement by using the highest possible “level” of inputs. Level 1 inputs are observable quotes in an active market for identical assets and liabilities. We consider the valuation of marketable securities transacted through a clearing broker with a published price from the appropriate exchange as a Level 1 valuation. Level 2 inputs are inputs observable for similar assets and liabilities. We consider over-the-counter (“OTC”) commodity derivatives entered into directly with third parties as Level 2 valuation since the values of these derivatives are quoted on an exchange for similar transactions. Level 3 valuations include significant unobservable inputs. During the year ended December 31, 2008, HER valued its forward propane contracts using the current spot price with an adjustment for estimated inflation. Therefore, as of December 31, 2008, the HER forward propane contracts were considered a level 3 valuation. However, during the year ended December 31, 2009, HER began valuing its forward propane contracts using the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”). As such, we currently consider these commodity derivatives as a Level 2 valuation and no longer have any fair value measurements that are considered Level 3 valuations.
15
The following table summarizes the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 based on inputs used to derive their fair values:
Fair Value Measurements at | Fair Value Measurements at | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 Using | December 31, 2009 Using | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Quoted Prices in | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Active Markets | Significant | |||||||||||||||||||||
for Identical | Other | for Identical | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||
Assets and | Observable | Assets and | Observable | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Liabilities | Inputs | Fair Value | Liabilities | Inputs | |||||||||||||||||||
Description | Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketatable Securities | $ | 2,020 | $ | 2,020 | $ | — | $ | 6,044 | $ | 6,044 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Commodity Derivatives | 6,971 | — | 6,971 | 12,809 | — | 12,809 | ||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity Derivatives | (29 | ) | $ | — | $ | (29 | ) | (1,238 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1,238 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
$ | 8,962 | $ | 2,020 | $ | 6,942 | $ | 17,615 | $ | 6,044 | $ | 11,571 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in level 3 inputs and unrealized gains recognized related to open contracts for level 3 inputs are as follows:
Balance, December 31, 2008 | $ | 1,302 | ||
Transfers out of Level 3 | (1,302 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Balance, December 31, 2009 | $ | — | ||
|
|
Year Ended | ||||
December 31, 2008 | ||||
Unrealized gains recognized in other revenue related to open contracts | $ | 1,302 | ||
|
|
Costs and Expenses
Costs of products sold include actual cost of fuel sold, adjusted for the effects of commodity derivative activities, storage fees and inbound freight and the cost of appliances, parts and fittings. Operating expenses include all costs incurred to provide products to customers, including compensation for operations personnel, insurance costs, vehicle maintenance, advertising costs, shipping and handling costs, purchasing costs and plant operations. Selling, general and administrative expenses include all partnership related expenses and compensation for executive, partnership and administrative personnel.
We record the collection of taxes, principally sale and use taxes, to be remitted to governmental authorities on a net basis.
Income Taxes
The Propane Partnerships are limited partnerships. As a result, their earnings or losses for federal and state income tax purposes are included in the tax returns of the individual partners. Accordingly, no recognition has been given to income taxes in our accompanying financial statements except those incurred by corporate subsidiaries of us that are subject to income taxes. Net earnings for financial statement purposes may differ significantly from taxable income reportable to partners as a result of differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities, in addition to the allocation requirements related to taxable income under the Propane Partnerships’ agreements, as amended.
16
As limited partnerships, we are generally not subject to income tax. We are, however, subject to a statutory requirement that our non-qualifying income (including income such as derivative gains from trading activities, service income, tank rentals and others) cannot exceed 10% of our total gross income, determined on a calendar year basis under the applicable income tax provisions. If the amount of our non-qualifying income exceeds this statutory limit, we would be taxed as a corporation. Accordingly, certain activities that generate non-qualifying income are conducted through taxable corporate subsidiaries (“C corporations”). These C corporations are subject to federal and state income tax and pay the income taxes related to the results of their operations. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, our non-qualifying income did not exceed the statutory limit.
Those subsidiaries which are taxable corporations follow the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, under which deferred income taxes are recorded based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the underlying assets are received and liabilities settled.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments
All derivatives are recognized in the combined balance sheets as either an asset or liability measured at fair value.
In the course of normal operations, we routinely enter into contracts such as forward physical contracts for the purchase and sale of propane that qualify for and are designated as a normal purchase and sales contracts. Such contracts are exempted from the fair value accounting requirements. In addition, HER buys and sells derivative instruments that are not designated as accounting hedges.
We enter into propane sales commitments with a portion of our retail customers that provide for a contracted price agreement for a specified period of time, typically no longer than one year. These commitments can expose the operations to product price risk if not offset by a propane purchase commitment. To hedge a significant portion of these sales commitments entered into under our customer prebuy programs, Titan enters into financial instruments (swap agreements) to lock in margins.
For qualifying hedges, we formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive cash flow hedge accounting treatment and the gains and losses offset related results on the hedged item in the statement of operations. The market prices used to value our financial derivatives and related transactions have been determined using independent third party prices, readily available market information, and appropriate valuation techniques.
At inception of a hedge, we formally document the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, the risk management objectives, and the methods used for assessing and testing effectiveness and how any ineffectiveness will be measured and recorded. We also assess, both at the inception of the hedge and on a quarterly basis, whether the derivatives that are used in our hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows. If it is determined that a derivative is no longer highly effective as a hedge, we would discontinue hedge accounting prospectively by including changes in the fair value of the derivative in net income for the period.
Cash flows from derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges are reported as cash flows from operating activities, in the same category as the cash flows from the items being hedged.
If we designate a derivative financial instrument as a cash flow hedge and it qualifies for hedge accounting, the change in the fair value is deferred in AOCI until the underlying hedged transaction occurs. Any ineffective portion of a cash flow hedge’s change in fair value would be recognized each period in earnings. Gains and losses deferred in AOCI related to cash flow hedges remain in AOCI until the underlying physical transaction occurs, unless it is probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within an additional two-month period of time thereafter. For financial derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting, the change in fair value is recorded in cost of products sold in the combined statements of operations and comprehensive income.
17
Inherent in the contractual portfolio are certain business risks, including market risk and credit risk. Market risk is the risk that the value of the portfolio will change, either favorably or unfavorably, in response to changing market conditions. Credit risk is the risk of loss from nonperformance by suppliers, customers, or financial counterparties to a contract. We take an active role in managing and controlling market and credit risk over our commodity-related activities, and we have established control procedures, which are reviewed on an ongoing basis. We monitor market risk of commodity-related activities through a variety of techniques, including routine reporting to senior management. We attempt to minimize credit risk exposure through credit policies and periodic monitoring procedures.
New Accounting Standards
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment(“ASU 2011-08”), which simplifies how entities test goodwill for impairment. ASU 2011-08 give entities the option, under certain circumstances, to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether further impairment testing is necessary. ASU 2011-08 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect adoption of this standard will materially impact our financial position or results of operations.
18
4. | LONG-TERM DEBT: |
Our debt obligations consist of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Maturities | ||||||||
HOLP Senior Secured Notes: | ||||||||||
8.55% Senior Secured Notes | $ | 12,000 | $ | 24,000 | Annual payments of $12,000 due each June 30 through 2011. Interest is paid semi-annually. | |||||
Medium Term Note Program: | ||||||||||
7.26% Series B Senior Secured Notes | 4,000 | 6,000 | Annual payments of $2,000 due each November 19 through 2012. Interest is paid semi-annually. | |||||||
Senior Secured Promissory Notes: | ||||||||||
8.55% Series B Senior Secured Notes | — | 4,571 | Matured in August 2010. | |||||||
8.59% Series C Senior Secured Notes | — | 5,750 | Matured in August 2010. | |||||||
8.67% Series D Senior Secured Notes | 25,400 | 33,100 | Annual payments of $12,450 due August 15, 2011 and $12,950 due August 15, 2012. Interest is paid quarterly. | |||||||
8.75% Series E Senior Secured Notes | 5,000 | 6,000 | Annual payments of $1,000 due each August 15 through 2015. Interest is paid quarterly. | |||||||
8.87% Series F Senior Secured Notes | 36,364 | 40,000 | Annual payments of $3,636 due each August 15 through 2020. Interest is paid quarterly. | |||||||
7.89% Series H Senior Secured Notes | 4,364 | 5,091 | Annual payments of $727 due each May 15 through 2016. Interest is paid quarterly. | |||||||
7.99% Series I Senior Secured Notes | 16,000 | 16,000 | One payment due May 15, 2013. Interest is paid quarterly. | |||||||
Revolving Credit Facilities: | ||||||||||
HOLP Fourth Amended and Restated Senior Revolving Credit Facility | — | 10,000 | See below under “HOLP Credit Facility”. | |||||||
Other Long-Term Debt: | ||||||||||
Notes payable on noncompete agreements with interest imputed at rates averaging 8.14%, and 8.06% at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively | 7,935 | 7,898 | Due in installments through 2014. | |||||||
Other | 1,605 | 2,224 | Due in installments through 2024. | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
112,668 | 160,634 | |||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | (35,265 | ) | (40,887 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
$ | 77,403 | $ | 119,747 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
Future maturities of long-term debt for each of the next five years and thereafter are:
2011 | $ | 35,265 | ||
2012 | 23,378 | |||
2013 | 23,051 | |||
2014 | 6,108 | |||
2015 | 5,931 | |||
Thereafter | 18,935 | |||
|
| |||
$ | 112,668 | |||
|
|
19
HOLP Senior Secured Notes
All receivables, contracts, equipment, inventory, general intangibles, cash concentration accounts, and the capital stock of HOLP and its subsidiaries secure the HOLP Senior Secured, Medium Term, and Senior Secured Promissory Notes (collectively, the “HOLP Senior Secured Notes”).
HOLP Credit Facility
HOLP previously had a $75,000 Senior Revolving Facility (the “HOLP Credit Facility”) available through June 30, 2011. As of December 31, 2010, the HOLP Credit Facility had no outstanding balance in revolving credit loans and outstanding letters of credit of $500. The amount available for borrowing as of December 31, 2010 was $74,500. The HOLP Credit Facility was terminated in February 2011.
The Propane Partnerships will meet future liquidity needs through intercompany loans from ETP.
Covenants Related to Agreements
The agreements related to the HOLP Senior Secured Notes were amended in February 2011 to revise the financial covenants and to allow for intercompany loans from ETP on a subordinated basis. The amended agreements contain customary restrictive covenants including the maintenance of financial covenants and limitations on substantial disposition of assets, changes in ownership, the level of additional indebtedness and creation of liens. The amended financial covenants require HOLP to maintain ratios of combined Funded Indebtedness to combined EBITDA (as these terms are similarly defined in the amended agreements related to the HOLP Senior Secured Notes) of not more than 3.25 to 1 and combined EBITDA to combined Interest Expense (as these terms are similarly defined in the amended agreements related to the HOLP Senior Secured Notes) of not less than 2.25 to 1. These amended debt agreements also provide that HOLP may declare, make, or incur a liability to make restricted payments during each fiscal quarter, if: (a) the amount of such restricted payment, together with all other restricted payments during such quarter, do not exceed the amount of Available Cash (as defined in the amended agreements related to the HOLP Senior Secured Notes) with respect to the immediately preceding quarter (which amount is required to reflect a reserve equal to 50% of the interest to be paid on the HOLP Senior Secured Notes during the last quarter and in addition, in the third, second and first quarters preceding a quarter in which a scheduled principal payment is to be made on the HOLP Senior Secured Notes, and a reserve equal to 25%, 50%, and 75%, respectively, of the principal amount to be repaid on such payment dates), (b) no default or event of default exists before such restricted payments, and (c) the amounts of HOLP’s restricted payment is not disproportionately greater than the payment amount from Energy Transfer Company (“ETC OLP”) utilized to fund payment obligations of ETP and its general partner with respect to ETP’s Common Units.
Failure to comply with the various restrictive and affirmative covenants of the amended note agreements related to the HOLP Senior Secured Notes could require us to pay debt balances prior to scheduled maturity and could negatively impact our ability to incur additional debt.
We were in compliance with all requirements, tests, limitations and covenants related to our debt agreements for HOLP’s Senior Secured Notes as of December 31, 2010.
5. | PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND UNIT-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS: |
Limited Partner and General Partner interests in the Propane Partnerships entitle the holders thereof to the rights and privileges specified in HOLP and Titan L.P.’s partnership agreements, as amended.
For the purposes of maintaining the capital accounts and in determining the rights of the Partners among themselves, items of income, gain, loss and deductions shall generally be allocated among the Partners in accordance with their respective percentage interests of the Propane Partnerships.
No person is entitled to preemptive rights in respect of issuances of securities by the Propane Partnerships, except that ETP GP as the General Partner of HOLP, and Titan Energy GP, LLC as the General Partner of Titan L.P. may, but are not obligated to, make additional capital contributions to HOLP and Titan L.P., respectively.
20
Quarterly Distributions of Available Cash
HOLP and Titan L.P.’s partnership agreements, as amended, require the Propane Partnerships to distribute all of their Available Cash to their Limited Partners and their General Partner within forty-five days following the end of each fiscal quarter. The term Available Cash generally means, with respect to any of our fiscal quarters, all cash on hand at the end of such quarter, plus working capital borrowings after the end of the quarter, less reserves established by the General Partner in its sole discretion to provide for the proper conduct of our businesses, to comply with applicable laws or any debt instrument or other agreement, or to provide funds for future distributions to partners with respect to any one or more of the next four quarters. Distributions totaling $110,000, $81,697 and $80,000 were made by HOLP during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. There were no distributions made by Titan L.P.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following table presents the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), net of tax:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities | $ | 918 | $ | 4,941 | ||||
Net gains on commodity related hedges | 6,388 | 8,610 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total AOCI, net of tax | $ | 7,306 | $ | 13,551 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Unit-Based Compensation Plans
ETP has issued equity incentive plans for employees, officers and directors, which provide for various types of awards, including options to purchase ETP Common Units, restricted units, phantom units, Common Units, distribution equivalent rights (“DERs”), Common Unit appreciation rights, and other unit-based awards. Certain HOLP and Titan employees participate in these plans. As of December 31, 2010, an aggregate total of 3,657,136 ETP Common Units remain available to be awarded under ETP’s equity incentive plans.
Unit Grants
ETP has granted restricted unit awards to employees that vest over a specified time period, typically a five-year period at 20% per year, with vesting based on continued employment as of each applicable vesting date. Upon vesting, ETP Common Units are issued. These unit awards entitle the recipients of the unit awards to receive, with respect to each Common Unit subject to such award that has not either vested or been forfeited, a cash payment equal to each cash distribution per Common Unit made by ETP on ETP Common Units promptly following each such distribution by ETP to its Unitholders. We refer to these rights as “distribution equivalent rights.”
Award Activity
The following table shows the activity of the awards granted to HOLP and Titan employees:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant-Date | ||||||||
Number of | Fair Value | |||||||
Units | Per Unit | |||||||
Unvested awards as of December 31, 2009 | 359,498 | $ | 39.11 | |||||
Awards granted | 118,650 | 49.98 | ||||||
Awards vested | (91,913 | ) | 39.83 | |||||
Awards forfeited | (13,918 | ) | 38.70 | |||||
|
| |||||||
Unvested awards as of December 31, 2010 | 372,317 | 42.41 | ||||||
|
|
21
During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the weighted average grant-date fair value per unit award granted was $49.98, $44.15 and $34.37, respectively. The total fair value of awards vested was $3,661, $3,048 and $6,806, respectively, based on the market price of ETP Common Units as of the vesting date. As of December 31, 2010, a total of 372,317 unit awards remain unvested, for which we expect to recognize a total of $10,841 in compensation expense over a weighted average period of 1.85 years.
6. | MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIERS: |
Concentrations of customers may impact our overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or negatively. Management believes that our portfolio of accounts receivable is sufficiently diversified to minimize any potential credit risk. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of our revenue.
We had gross purchases as a percentage of total purchases from major suppliers as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Unaffiliated | ||||||||||||
Targa | 12.9 | % | 14.3 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||||
MP Oils | 13.3 | % | 15.1 | % | 14.9 | % | ||||||
Affiliated | ||||||||||||
Enterprise | 53.5 | % | 50.3 | % | 50.7 | % |
Substantially all agreements with Targa Liquids Marketing and Trade (“Targa”) have a maximum duration of one year.
In connection with the sale of MP Oils in October 2007, HOLP executed a propane purchase agreement for approximately 90.0 million gallons per year through 2015.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (together with its subsidiaries “Enterprise”) is a related party as discussed in Note 11. The propane operations have an agreement with Enterprise to supply a portion of our propane requirements.
This concentration of suppliers may impact our overall operations either positively or negatively. However, management believes that the diversification of suppliers is sufficient to enable us to purchase all of our supply needs at market prices without a material disruption of operations if supplies are interrupted from any of our existing sources. Although no assurances can be given that supplies of propane will be readily available in the future, we expect a sufficient supply to continue to be available.
7. | COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES: |
Commitments
We have entered into several propane purchase and supply commitments, which are typically one year agreements with varying terms as to quantities, prices and expiration dates. We believe that the terms of these agreements are commercially reasonable and will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
We have certain non-cancelable leases for property and equipment, which require fixed monthly rental payments and expire at various dates through 2034. Rental expense under these operating leases has been included in operating expenses in the combined statements of operations and comprehensive income and totaled approximately $4,904, $5,176 and $5,116 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
22
Future minimum lease commitments for such leases are:
Years Ending December 31: | ||||
2011 | $ | 4,362 | ||
2012 | 3,353 | |||
2013 | 2,539 | |||
2014 | 1,267 | |||
2015 | 702 | |||
Thereafter | 835 |
The propane operations have an agreement with Enterprise (see Note 11) to supply a portion of our propane requirements. The agreement will continue until March 2015 and includes an option to extend the agreement for an additional year.
In connection with the sale of MP Oils in October 2007, HOLP executed a propane purchase agreement for approximately 90.0 million gallons per year through 2015 at market prices plus a nominal fee.
Litigation and Contingencies
We may, from time to time, be involved in litigation and claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. Propane is a flammable, combustible gas. Serious personal injury and significant property damage can arise in connection with its storage, transportation or use. In the ordinary course of business, we are sometimes threatened with or named as a defendant in various lawsuits seeking actual and punitive damages for product liability, personal injury and property damage. We maintain liability insurance with insurers in amounts and with coverage and deductibles management believes are reasonable and prudent, and which are generally accepted in the industry. However, there can be no assurance that the levels of insurance protection currently in effect will continue to be available at reasonable prices or that such levels will remain adequate to protect us from material expenses related to product liability, personal injury or property damage in the future.
We are a party to various legal proceedings and/or regulatory proceedings incidental to our businesses. For each of these matters, we evaluate the merits of the case, our exposure to the matter, possible legal or settlement strategies, the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and the availability of insurance coverage. If we determine that an unfavorable outcome of a particular matter is probable and can be estimated we accrue the contingent obligation as well as any expected insurance recoverable amounts related to the contingency. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, accruals of approximately $10,170 and $11,051, respectively, were reflected on our combined balance sheets related to these contingent obligations. As new information becomes available, our estimates may change. The impact of these changes may have a significant effect on our results of operations in a single period.
The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty and there can be no assurance that the outcome of a particular matter will not result in the payment of amounts that have not been accrued for the matter. Furthermore, we may revise accrual amounts prior to resolution of a particular contingency based on changes in facts and circumstances or changes in the expected outcome.
No amounts have been recorded in our December 31, 2010 or 2009 combined balance sheets for contingencies and current litigation, other than amounts disclosed herein.
Environmental Matters
Petroleum-based contamination or environmental wastes are known to be located on or adjacent to six sites, on which HOLP presently has, or formerly had, retail propane operations. These sites were evaluated at the time of their acquisition. In all cases, remediation operations have been or will be undertaken by others, and in all six cases, HOLP obtained indemnification for expenses associated with any remediation from the former owners or related entities. We have not been named as a potentially responsible party at any of these sites, nor have our operations contributed to the environmental issues at these sites. Accordingly, no amounts have been recorded in our December 31, 2010 or 2009 combined balance sheets. Based on information currently available to us, such projects are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
23
In July 2001, HOLP acquired a company that had previously received a request for information from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) regarding potential contribution to a widespread groundwater contamination problem in San Bernardino, California, known as the Newmark Groundwater Contamination. Although the EPA has indicated that the groundwater contamination may be attributable to releases of solvents from a former military base located within the subject area that occurred long before the facility acquired by HOLP was constructed, it is possible that the EPA may seek to recover all or a portion of groundwater remediation costs from private parties under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (commonly called Superfund). We have not received any follow-up correspondence from the EPA on the matter since our acquisition of the predecessor company in 2001. Based upon information currently available to HOLP, it is believed that HOLP’s liability if such action were to be taken by the EPA would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
In connection with the purchase of Titan Energy Partners, L.P., we took, through Titan Propane, LLC, an economic interest in SYN, Inc. (“SYN”), an entity in Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings (initiated in 2005 by legacy Titan management) in New York.
Our research and investigation indicates that SYN is the beneficial holder (legal title does not appear to have been perfected as to any of the properties in question) of title to three former manufactured coal gas plants located in Bennington, Vermont; Claremont, New Hampshire; and Chestertown, Maryland. It appears that Titan’s predecessor, Cornerstone Propane Partners, LP, collapsed several entities which held title to properties contributed to the formation of Cornerstone Propane Partners, LP, by the owners of Synergy Gas, one of the privately held entities that contributed their assets to form Cornerstone Propane Partners, L.P., as part of Cornerstone’s formation and eventual public offering.
The site in Bennington, Vermont was used from approximately the late 1980s through approximately 2004 as a retail propane facility. In 2004, the property was abandoned. The property has remained vacant since that time. Although it appears that monitoring wells were installed at the property by the prior owners, an inspection of the property in 2007 revealed the wells to be capped and inactive. The nature and extent of the contamination at the property is therefore unknown.
The Claremont, New Hampshire site was operated at a coal gas plant which serviced the entire town, which was a largely industrialized (mill) town in the late 1800s and early 1900s. A partially-destroyed brick building and the remains of a large coal tar holding tank remain at the property. The property, which abuts the Sugar River, is contaminated with coal tar and coal tar derivatives. A retail propane facility operated at the property in during the time period of 1970 – 1980 but public records indicate that the site has been abandoned and unused since the late 1980s. In 2008, the City of Claremont partially dammed the Sugar River upstream of the site in order to lower the water level in connection with the improvement of the riverbed. The lowering of the water level reduced the hydrostatic pressure against the river side of the site, allowing coal tar to escape and migrate into the river. Containment work was successfully completed and the Sugar River returned to its normal level in late 2008. No additional releases have been reported.
As with the other sites, the Chestertown site is a former coal gas plant used as a retail propane facility that was found to have coal tar contamination at the approximate on-half acre site. We have agreed to further explore delineation of the coal tar contamination at the site itself and the ash pit contamination on the adjacent wetlands, which are environmentally stable.
Environmental exposures and liabilities are difficult to assess and estimate due to unknown factors such as the magnitude of possible contamination, the timing and extent of remediation, the determination of our liability in proportion to other parties, improvements in clean-up technologies and the extent to which environmental laws and regulations may change in the future. Although environmental costs may have a significant impact on the results of operations for any single period, we believe that such costs will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position.
24
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, an accrual on an undiscounted basis of $2,720 was recorded in our combined balance sheets as other non-current liabilities related to environmental matters. This accrual is to cover future legal costs and any clean-up costs and settlement of the environmental matters related to the three former coal gas plants. Based on information available at this time and reviews undertaken to identify potential exposure, we believe the amount reserved for environmental matters is adequate to cover the potential exposure for clean-up costs.
Environmental regulations were recently modified for the EPA Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures program. We are currently reviewing the impact to our operations and expect to expend resources on tank integrity testing and any associated corrective actions as well as potential upgrades to containment structures. Costs associated with tank integrity testing and resulting corrective actions cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, but we believe such costs will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Our operations are also subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”), and comparable state laws that regulate the protection of the health and safety of employees. In addition, OSHA’s hazardous communication standard requires that information be maintained about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that this information be provided to employees, state and local government authorities and citizens. We believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with the OSHA requirements, including general industry standards, record keeping requirements, and monitoring of occupational exposure to regulated substances.
National Fire Protection Association Pamphlets No. 54 and No. 58, which establish rules and procedures governing the safe handling of propane, or comparable regulations, have been adopted as the industry standard in all of the states in which we operate. In some states, these laws are administered by state agencies, and in others, they are administered on a municipal level. With respect to the transportation of propane by truck, we are subject to regulations governing the transportation of hazardous materials under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act, administered by the DOT. We conduct ongoing training programs to help ensure that our operations are in compliance with applicable regulations. We believe that the procedures currently in effect at all of our facilities for the handling, storage and distribution of propane are consistent with industry standards and are in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
8. | ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FROM LIQUIDS MARKETING: |
HER buys and sells derivative instruments that are not designated as accounting hedges. The types of contracts we utilize in our liquids marketing operation include energy commodity forward contracts traded on OTC financial markets. These forward contracts are marked-to-market and recorded as an asset or liability on the combined balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets or accrued and other current liabilities and recorded net in other revenue on the combined statements of operations and comprehensive income. Changes in the assets and liabilities from the liquids marketing activities result primarily from changes in the market prices, newly originated transactions, and the timing and settlement of contracts. We attempt to balance our contractual portfolio in terms of notional amounts and timing of performance and delivery obligations. However, net unbalanced positions can exist or are established based on management’s assessment of anticipated market movements. As of December 31, 2010, we had a net long position of 420,000 gallons of propane with a net fair value asset of $78. These contracts matured during 2011. As of December 31, 2009, there were no unbalanced positions and the net fair value of financial instruments related to liquids marketing activities was a liability of $220. These contracts matured during 2010.
Summary of Derivative Gains and Losses
The following represents HER’s derivative activity recognized in net income:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Commodity-related | ||||||||||||
Unrealized trading gains (losses) recognized in other revenue | $ | 298 | $ | (1,522 | ) | $ | 1,302 | |||||
Realized trading gains recognized in other revenue | 1,912 | 3,283 | 204 |
25
9. | PRICE RISK MANAGEMENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES: |
Our propane operations permit customers to guarantee the propane delivery price for the next heating season. As we execute fixed sales price contracts with our customers, Titan may enter into propane futures contracts to fix the purchase price related to these sales contracts, thereby locking in a gross profit margin. Additionally, Titan may use propane futures contracts to secure the purchase price of our propane inventory for a percentage of our anticipated propane sales.
The following table details the outstanding commodity-related derivatives as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Notional | Notional | |||||||||||||||
Volume | Maturity | Volume | Maturity | |||||||||||||
Mark-to-Market Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||
Forwards/Swaps (Gallons) | 1,974,000 | 2011 | 6,090,000 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedging Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||
Forwards/Swaps (Gallons) | 32,466,000 | 2011 | 20,538,000 | 2010 |
We expect gains of $6,388 related to commodity derivatives to be reclassified into earnings over the next twelve months related to amounts currently reported in AOCI. The amount ultimately realized, however, will differ as commodity prices change and the underlying physical transaction occurs.
The following table provides a balance sheet overview of the derivative assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
Fair Value | ||||||||
of Derivative Instruments | ||||||||
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||
Commodity derivatives | $ | 6,589 | $ | 8,443 | ||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||
Commodity derivatives | $ | 275 | $ | 3,348 |
The commodity derivatives are recorded in price risk management assets on the combined balance sheets.
The following tables summarize the amounts recognized with respect to our derivative financial instruments for the periods presented:
Change in Value Recognized in OCI on Derivatives | ||||||||||||
(Effective Portion) | ||||||||||||
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships: | ||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives | $ | 9,502 | $ | 12,632 | — |
26
Location of Gain/(Loss) | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassed from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | |||||||||||||
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships: | ||||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives | Cost of products sold | $ | 11,724 | $ | 4,022 | — |
Location of Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | |||||||||||||
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives | Cost of products sold | $ | 38 | $ | 7,025 | $ | (64,177 | ) |
We recognized in cost of products sold, $3,073 of unrealized losses, $45,636 of unrealized gains and $45,607 of unrealized losses on commodity derivatives not in cash flow hedging relationships for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
10. | RETIREMENT BENEFITS: |
ETP sponsors a 401(k) savings plan, which covers virtually all HOLP and Titan employees. Employer matching contributions are calculated using a formula based on employee contributions. The Propane Partnerships made matching contributions of $5,001, $5,454 and $5,886 to the 401(k) savings plan for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, for HOLP and Titan employees.
11. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS: |
ETP allocates administration expenses to its operating partnerships using the Modified Massachusetts Formula Calculation (“MMFC”). The amounts allocated to propane operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $14,196, $12,113 and $12,664, respectively. The amounts for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were offset by costs allocated to ETP from its operating partnerships for support services. The amount allocated to ETP, using the MMFC, from the propane operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $412 and $2,428, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, Enterprise owned approximately 17.6% of the outstanding common units of ETE. We routinely buy and sell product with Enterprise. The following table presents sales of propane to and purchases of propane from affiliates of Enterprise:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Sales | $ | 15,527 | $ | 19,961 | $ | 22,211 | ||||||
Purchases | 415,897 | 343,540 | 493,809 |
As of December 31, 2010, HER had no outstanding forward mark-to-market derivatives with Enterprise. As of December 31, 2009, HER had a net long position of 420,000 gallons of propane with a net fair value asset of $57 on these contracts with Enterprise.
We purchase a portion of our propane requirements from Enterprise pursuant to an agreement that was extended until March 2015, and includes an option to extend the agreement for an additional year. As of December 31,
27
2010 and 2009, Titan had forward mark-to-market derivatives for approximately 1,722,000 and 6,090,000 gallons of propane at a fair value asset of $205 and $3,348, respectively, with Enterprise. In addition, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, Titan had forward derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges of 32,466,000 and 20,538,000 gallons of propane at a fair value asset of $6,589 and $8,443, respectively, with Enterprise. Our forward mark-to-market derivatives and cash flow hedges are settled on a net basis with Enterprise.
The following table summarizes the related party balances on our combined balance sheets:
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Accounts receivable from related parties: | ||||||||
Enterprise | $ | 2,327 | $ | 3,386 | ||||
ETP | 68,603 | 18,481 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total accounts receivable from related parties | $ | 70,930 | $ | 21,867 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Accounts payable to related parties: | ||||||||
Enterprise | $ | 22,985 | $ | 31,642 | ||||
ETC OLP | — | 152 | ||||||
ETP | 86,158 | 25,984 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total accounts payable to related parties | $ | 109,143 | $ | 57,778 | ||||
|
|
|
|
For cash management purposes, Titan’s excess cash is swept to ETP on a daily basis. If cash is not available to meet daily operational cash requirements, ETP advances funds back to Titan. This net activity is included in accounts receivable from related parties for ETP at December 31, 2010 and 2009. Affiliated interest income related to these transactions for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $1,636 and $617, respectively. Affiliated interest expense related to these transactions for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $2,942.
Accounts payable to related parties for ETP at December 31, 2010 and 2009 primarily consists of certain costs incurred by ETP on our behalf, such as, business insurance expenses, employee health insurance expenses and administration expenses as discussed above.
12. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS: |
Since January 1, 2011, we have acquired substantially all of the assets of eight propane businesses. The aggregate purchase price for these acquisitions totaled $36,065, which included $26,548 of cash paid, net of cash acquired, liabilities assumed of $6,180 and 66,499 ETP Common Units issued valued at $3,000.
In October 2011, ETP entered into an agreement with AmeriGas Partners, L.P. (“AmeriGas” or “APU”) to contribute our propane operations to AmeriGas in exchange for consideration of approximately $2.9 billion. The consideration consists of $1.5 billion in cash and common units of AmeriGas valued at approximately $1.3 billion at the time of the execution of the agreement, plus the assumption of certain liabilities of our propane operations. Following the transaction, ETP will own approximately 34% of the common units of APU and has committed to retain those units until at least 2013. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended.
Management has evaluated subsequent events through November 21, 2011, the date the financial statements were available to be issued.
28