Item | 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
The Special Meeting of Stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) of Rent-A-Center, Inc. (the “Company”) was held on September 18, 2018. At the Special Meeting, the Company’s stockholders voted on three matters:
(1) to adopt and approve (a) the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as it may be amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of June 17, 2018, by and among the Company, Vintage Rodeo Parent, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Parent”), and Vintage Rodeo Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, and (b) the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including, without limitation, the Merger (the “Merger Proposal”);
(2) a proposal to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, specified compensation that may become payable to the named executive officers of the Company in connection with the Merger (the “Advisory Compensation Proposal”); and
(3) a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Proposal (the “Adjournment Proposal”).
The final voting results for each proposal are set forth below.
Proposal One: The Merger Proposal was approved by the requisite vote of the Company’s stockholders. The voting results regarding this proposal are set forth below:
| | | | | | | | |
Votes For | | Votes Against | | | Abstentions | |
41,539,430 | | | 2,914,220 | | | | 479,267 | |
Proposal Two: The Advisory Compensation Proposal was approved by the requisite vote of the Company’s stockholders. The voting results regarding this proposal are set forth below:
| | | | | | | | |
Votes For | | Votes Against | | | Abstentions | |
39,836,300 | | | 4,472,122 | | | | 624,466 | |
Proposal Three: The Adjournment Proposal was approved by the requisite vote of the Company’s stockholders. The voting results regarding this proposal are set forth below:
| | | | | | | | |
Votes For | | Votes Against | | | Abstentions | |
41,403,796 | | | 3,029,550 | | | | 499,472 | |
Although Proposal Three was approved, adjournment of the Special Meeting was not necessary or appropriate because the Company’s stockholders approved the Merger Proposal.
The Merger remains subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions that have not yet been satisfied, including receipt of regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions.
2