MEMORANDUM |
TO: | Jaea Hahn U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
FROM: | Diana R. Gonzalez Associate General Counsel |
DATE: | January 20, 2016 |
SUBJECT: | Response to Comments to the initial registration statement (the "Registration Statement") filed on Form N-14 on December 16, 2015 relating to the merger of the JNL/Mellon Capital Frontier Markets 100 Index Fund, a series of the Jackson Variable Series Trust, into the JNL/Mellon Capital Emerging Markets Index Fund, a series of the JNL Series Trust ("Registrant") File No: 333-208569 |
This memorandum addresses the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission staff's ("Commission" and "Commission Staff," as appropriate) comments to the Registration Statement received via telephone on January 7, 2016.
The comments are repeated below in italics, with responses immediately following.
a. | Please uniformly apply all applicable comments received from the Commission Staff on other N-14 filings that were also filed on December 16, 2015 to this Registration Statement. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant has applied all applicable Commission Staff comments received on the other N-14 filings to this N-14.
b. | Please include the proxy and voting instruction cards with the Registration Statement filing. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant confirms that proxy and voting instruction cards were included in the preliminary N-14 filing on December 16, 2015 as Exhibit 17.
c. | Under the section entitled, "How an Insurance Company will Vote," the Registrant states that the Insurance Company and its affiliates will vote their own shares and shares held by other regulated investment companies in the same proportion as voting instructions timely given by Contract Owners. Please explain the legal basis for proportionately voting shares and please confirm that this disclosure is also made in the regulated investment company's Registration Statements. |
RESPONSE: Rule 6e-2 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, provides that a life insurer shall cast its votes for and against each matter which may be voted upon by contractholders in the same proportion as the votes cast by contractholders. The Registrant is not aware of any requirement to include this language in a fund's Registration Statement, and has chosen to include it in proxy statement and N-14 filings because the disclosure is relevant when requesting shareholder votes on a matter.
d. | On page 2 of the Registration Statement, please describe any differences between a frontier market country and an emerging market country. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant notes that because the investment objective of the JNL/Mellon Capital Emerging Market Index Fund is to track the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (the "Index"), any country that the Fund deems to be an emerging market country will correspond with any country that the Index considers to be emerging market.
e. | On page 2 of the Registration Statement under the third bullet, the Registrant has stated that both Funds mainly invest in common stocks of companies included in an index and that the Acquiring Fund may invest to a significant degree in derivative instruments. Therefore, please highlight any differences in the risks for each Fund and include any accompanying risks, as appropriate. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant notes that a narrative description of the similarities and differences in the risk profiles of each fund is already included on page 2 of the Registration Statement under the third bullet point.
f. | On page 3 of the Registration Statement under the first full bullet point and on page 13 under "Board Considerations," please confirm that the net asset amounts provided are as of September 30, 2015 because the numbers do not agree with the September 30, 2015 N-Q Filing. |
RESPONSE: In all places where applicable, the Registrant has updated the net asset amount for the JNL/Mellon Capital Emerging Market Index Fund in the Registration Statement to match the net asset amount provided for in the September 30, 2015 N-Q filing.
g. | On page 3 of the Registration Statement under the second to last bullet point, please state any contingency plans that the Registrant has if the Reorganization is not approved by shareholders. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant has included its contingency plan in the event the Reorganization is not approved by shareholders on page 14, under the section entitled, "Contingency Plan."
h. | On pages 2-3 of the Registration Statement, please describe any portfolio repositioning that is expected to occur in connection with the Reorganization. The Registrant's disclosure should explain the extent to which the holdings of each fund may be repositioned and may include an estimate of the holdings of each fund that are expected to be resold. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant respectfully declines this request. As of the date hereof, it would potentially be misleading for the Registrant to estimate the extent to which the holdings of each fund may be repositioned or to include an estimate of the holdings of each fund that are expected to be resold.
i. | On page 3 of the Registration Statement under the last bullet point discussing the expected transaction costs of the Reorganization, please clarify how the costs will be allocated between each fund by stating whether the costs will be based upon relative net assets of each fund. Additionally, the disclosure should quantify how much of the transaction costs will be borne by each fund. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant confirms that each Fund will bear its proportionate share of the transaction expenses based on the net asset value of each Fund at the time of the Reorganization. However, because the date of the Reorganization is several months in the future, the Registrant does not believe that it would be appropriate to further quantify these transaction costs. As such, the Registrant has made the following update to the language in the disclosure:
The costs and expenses associated with the Reorganization relating to the solicitation of proxies, including preparing, filing, printing, and mailing of the proxy statement and related disclosure documents and the related legal fees, including the legal fees incurred in connection with the analysis under the Code of the tax treatment of this transaction as well as the costs associated with obtaining a consent of independent registered public accounting firm, will all be borne by JNAM, and no sales or other charges will be imposed on Contract Owners in connection with the Reorganization. Each Fund will bear its proportionate share of the transaction expenses based on the relative net asset value of each Fund at the time of the Reorganization, which typically includes but is not limited to trade commissions, related fees and taxes, and any foreign exchange spread costs, where applicable ("Transaction Costs"), associated with the Reorganization. Such Transaction Costs are estimated to be $325,590. Please see "Additional Information about the Reorganization" below for more information.
j. | On page 4 of the Registration Statement, please update the fee tables with most current expense information including any waiver information to the extent possible and include in the comment response letter any updates to the extent available. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant respectfully declines this request. The Registrant believes that presenting fee tables as of December 31, 2014 complies with the requirements of Form N-14 and Form N-1A because the initial filing was made within 60 days after the end of the Registrant's fiscal year (December 31) and audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year are not yet available.
Form N-14 requires "a table showing the current fees for the registrant and the company being acquired and pro forma fees, if different, for the registrant after giving effect to the transaction using the format prescribed" by Item 3 of Form N-1A. Form N-1A, Item 3, Instruction 3(d)(i) requires that a registrant "base the percentages of "Annual Fund Operating Expenses" on amounts incurred during the Fund's most recent fiscal year." For the purposes of Form N-1A, the presentation of "amounts incurred during the Fund's most recent fiscal year" is linked to the fund's financial statements included in its registration statement, such as the statement of operations. For example, Form N-1A, Item 3, Instruction 3(d)(i) states that "the amount of expenses deducted from the Fund's assets are the amounts shown as expenses in the Fund's statement of operations." Thus, the annual fund operating expense ratios presented in the fee tables should be based upon and correspond to amounts that appear in the Fund's statement of operations. Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933 sets forth the requirements for the content of financial statements and provides instructions regarding the timeliness of financial statements included in filings. Rule 3-18(b) of Regulation S-X states that "if the filing is made within 60 days after the end of the registrant's fiscal year and audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year are not available, … the statements of operations … shall be provided for the preceding fiscal year." Because the initial registration statement on Form N-14 was filed within 60 days after the end of the Registrant's fiscal year and audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year are not yet available, the Registrant's filing on Form N-14 includes a statement of operations for the Funds for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. The fee tables presented in the proxy statement/prospectus under Form N-14 correspond to this statement of operations as contemplated by Form N-1A.1 Accordingly, the Registrant believes the fee tables presenting annual fund operating expense ratios as of December 31, 2014 comply with the requirements of Form N-14 and Form N-1A.
The Registrant also would like to note that this analysis results in disclosure in the proxy statement/prospectus under Form N-14 regarding the Acquiring Fund that is consistent with the disclosure an investor would receive in the prospectus for the Acquiring Fund under Form N-1A, if such an investor were making an independent investment decision regarding the Acquiring Fund at this same point in time. As a result, a contract owner invested in the Acquired Fund is receiving information regarding the annual fund operating expense ratios that is no different than the information that would be provided to an investor making an investment decision regarding the Acquiring Fund unrelated to the proposed reorganization.
k. | On page 4 of the Registration Statement, please revise footnote number 1 relating to "Other Expenses" to include the disclosure from page 16 regarding the Adviser voluntarily waiving a portion of its advisory fee. If there is a termination date for the voluntary waiver, please include in the footnotes. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant respectfully declines this request because it does not believe that adding a voluntary waiver to a footnote of the fee table is a requirement of either Form N-1A or Form N-14.
l. | On page 5 of the Registration Statement, under "Comparison of Investment Objectives, Principal Policies and Strategies," please provide a narrative discussion highlighting the differences between the two Funds in addition to the disclosure provided for in the chart. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant notes that a narrative description of the investment objectives, principal policies and strategies of each fund is already included on page 2 of the Registration Statement under the first and second bullet points.
m. | On pages 5-7 of the Registration Statement, under "Comparison of Investment Objectives, Principal Policies and Strategies," please provide a corresponding emerging market country definition, since a definition of frontier market countries is already included. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant again notes that because the investment objective of the JNL/Mellon Capital Emerging Market Index Fund is to track the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (the "Index"), any country that the Fund deems to be an emerging market country will correspond with any country that the Index considers to be emerging market. Because the countries that are considered by the Index to be emerging markets vary over time, there is no comparable definition available to include.
n. | On page 6 of the Registration Statement, under "Comparison of Investment Objectives, Principal Policies and Strategies," please move the second paragraph relating to derivative usage for the Acquiring Fund to the first paragraph to mirror the Acquired Fund's disclosure regarding derivatives. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant respectfully declines this request because it believes that the sequence of each Fund's derivative disclosure is logical and exactly tracks the currently effective prospectus disclosure of the Acquiring Fund.
o. | On page 6 of the Registration Statement, under "Comparison of Investment Objectives, Principal Policies and Strategies," in the current first paragraph relating to derivative usage, the Acquiring Fund discusses using derivative instruments to a significant degree, please state whether the Acquired Fund can also invest in derivative instruments in a similar capacity. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant notes that the disclosure provided for in the Registration Statement accurately reflects the investment strategy of the Acquired Fund with respect to its intended usage of derivative instruments.
p. | On pages 5-7 of the Registration Statement, under "Comparison of Investment Objectives, Principal Policies and Strategies," in the discussion about the concentration of investments and any variations in the investment approaches, please revise so Registrant is talking about the same approach or strategy in both columns. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant notes that the disclosure provided for in the Registration Statement accurately reflects the investment strategy of each fund with respect to its concentrations of investments and any variations in its investment approach.
q. | On pages 5-7 of the Registration Statement, under "Comparison of Investment Objectives, Principal Policies and Strategies," the Acquired Fund is a non-diversified fund, please revise the disclosure to state that the Acquiring Fund is diversified and may not concentrate its investments like the Acquired Fund. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant has updated the language as requested.
r. | On pages 7-8 of the Registration Statement, under "Comparison of Principal Risk Factors," please provide a comparative discussion highlighting the differences in risks between the two Funds. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant notes that a narrative description of the similarities and differences in the risk profiles of each fund is already included on page 2 of the Registration Statement under the third bullet point.
s. | The principal investment strategies of both Funds state that they can each invest in depositary receipts, but it is only included as a primary risk for the JNL/Mellon Capital Frontier Markets 100 Index Fund. Please state why this is. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant will be supplementing the prospectus for the JNL/Mellon Capital Emerging Markets Index Fund prior to January 29, 2016, which is the effective date of this Registration Statement, to add depositary receipts risk for the Fund, which will also be added to this Registration Statement.
t. | Please explain why the JNL/Mellon Capital Emerging Markets Index Fund has as a principal investment risk managed portfolio risk given that it is a passive index fund. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant will be supplementing the prospectus for the JNL/Mellon Capital Emerging Markets Index Fund prior to January 29, 2016, which is the effective date of this Registration Statement, to remove managed portfolio risk as a principal risk for the Fund, which will also be added to this Registration Statement.
u. | On page 12 of the Registration Statement, please provide the Plain English disclosure for "pro rata" used in the section relating to the "Description of the Securities to Be Issued." |
RESPONSE: The Registrant respectfully declines this request given that pro rata is the most appropriate term in Plain English that could be used in this disclosure and that it is a term that is easily understood by most people.
v. | Please complete the blanks on pages 10, 24 and 25 and include in the correspondence responding to the Staff's comments. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant notes that much of the blank information is currently not available given that it is either based on a future date or that it has not been fully calculated as of the date of this letter. The Registrant confirms that all of the blanks in the Registration Statement will be included in the definitive Registration Statement filing, which will be filed as a 497c.
w. | On pages 12-14 of the Registration Statement, under the "Board Considerations" section, please provide in the disclosure any considerations that were adverse to the Reorganization considered by the Board. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant refers the Commission Staff to the "Board Considerations" section, which discusses all the factors considered by the Board, including those that might be viewed as not supporting the Reorganization.
x. | On page 13 of the Registration Statement, under the first bullet point, please state whether the operating expenses were higher for the Acquired Fund because it was managed as an active fund instead of a passive fund up until September 28, 2015, if relevant. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant notes that the fee table on page 4 has been restated to reflect current fees and expenses as per footnote 2. This restatement took place after the Acquired Fund moved from an actively managed fund to a passive index strategy and reflects that information that was provided to the Board in their consideration of the Reorganization. The Registrant has revised the language on page 13 under the first bullet point to clarify that the fees have been restated to reflect current fees and expenses.
y. | On page 13 of the Registration Statement, under the first bullet point, please explain the appropriateness of including data about the Acquired Fund being managed as an active fund up until September 28, 2015. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant notes that the fee table on page 4 has been restated to reflect current fees and expenses as per footnote 2. This restatement took place after the Acquired Fund moved from an actively managed fund to a passive index strategy and reflects that information that was provided to the Board in their consideration of the Reorganization. The Registrant has revised the language on page 13 under the first bullet point to clarify that the fees have been restated to reflect current fees and expenses.
z. | On page 14 of the Registration Statement, under "Board Considerations," the disclosure states that the JVST Board considered alternative options available for the Acquired Fund. Please state what those alternative options considered were. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant has deleted this sentence from the disclosure.
aa. | On page 14 of the Registration Statement, under "Description of Risk Factors," please highlight the differences between the Acquired Fund's derivative usage and the Acquiring Fund's derivative usage, if any. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant notes that each Fund's derivative usage is described in detail in the chart on page 6 of the Registration Statement.
bb. | On page 14 of the Registration Statement, under the "Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reorganization" section, please clarify the sentence that states "The Acquired Fund may dispose of a portion or all of its portfolio securities in connection with and prior to the Reorganization." This sentence seems overly broad, so please expand the disclosure to explain how the holdings will be repositioned in connection with the Reorganization. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant respectfully declines this request because it does not believe that the statement is overly broad, since it is currently impossible to predict exactly how holdings will be repositioned in connection with the Reorganization based on the variances of market conditions.
cc. | On page 16 of the Registration Statement, footnote 1 states that the Adviser is voluntarily waiving a portion of the management fee. Please disclose in the footnote the term of the waiver and/or whether it is a one-time waiver. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant respectfully declines this request because the nature of a voluntary waiver is that it is not for a fixed term and can be removed at any time unlike a contractual waiver.
dd. | In accordance with Form N-14, Item 10(a)(iii), please provide the date of the prospectus to which the Statement of Additional Information relates and any other identifying information. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant notes that the date of the prospectus, January 29, 2016, is provided for in the Statement of Additional Information at the bottom of page C-1.
ee. | In the pro forma section of the Statement of Additional Information, the Registrant states that the pro forma financial information is not required to be included because the net assets of the Acquired Fund as of January 15, 2016 are less than 10 percent of the net assets of the Acquiring Fund. Please confirm supplementally that the net assets did not exceed 10 percent as of January 15, 2016. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant hereby confirms that as of January 15, 2016, the net assets of the Acquired Fund are less than 10 percent of the net assets of the Acquiring Fund.
ff. | Please state supplementally which Fund will be the survivor for accounting purposes following the Reorganization. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant confirms that the JNL/Mellon Capital Emerging Markets Index Fund will be the survivor for accounting purposes following the Reorganization.
gg. | We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filings reviewed by the staff to be certain that they have provided all information investors require. Since the registrant and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a fund's disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure they have made. |
In connection with responding to our comments, please provide, in writing, a statement from the company acknowledging that:
· | the registrant is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings; |
· | staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the filing reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and |
· | the registrant may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. |
RESPONSE: The Registrant has included the Tandy Representation Letter as a part of this response.
It is the Registrant's intention to respond fully to the Commission Staff's comments, and believes that the changes described above do so fully. In addition to the changes described above, the Registrant has also made changes based on comments received from the Commission Staff on other N-14 filings, which for consistency purposes have been applied to this N-14 in all places where applicable.
If you have any questions, please call me at 312-730-9721. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
cc: File
1 The Registrant also has filed an interim statement of operations as required by Rule 3-18(b) of Regulation S-X. Although this interim statement of operations provides information regarding the expenses incurred by the Funds during fiscal year 2015, the information covers only the first six months of the fiscal year. The Registrant does not believe that annualizing such information is required by Form N-14 or Form N-1A.