The Company leases automobiles under four capital leases that expire between August 2010 and July 2011. Aggregate future obligations under the capital leases in effect as of March 31, 2009 are as follows:
Interest expense related to capital leases totaled $2,414 and $1,348 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
On March 31, 2006, the Board of Directors adopted the 2006 Equity Incentive Stock Plan (the “Plan”) and the majority stockholder approved the Plan by written consent. The purpose of the Plan is to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants and to promote the success of the Company business. The Plan permits the Company to grant both incentive stock options (“Incentive Stock Options” or “ISOs”) within the meaning of Section 422 of the of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), and other options with do not qualify as Incentive Stock Options (the “Non-Qualified Options”) and stock awards.
Unless earlier terminated by the Board of Directors, the Plan (but not outstanding options) terminates on March 31, 2016, after which no further awards may be granted under the Plan. The Plan is administered by the full Board of Directors or, at the Board of Director’s discretion, by a committee of the Board of Directors consisting of at least two persons who are “disinterested persons” defined under Rule 16b-2(c)(ii) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Committee”).
Recipients of options under the Plan (“Optionees”) are selected by the Board of Directors or the Committee. The Board of Directors or Committee determines the terms of each option grant including (1) the purchase price of shares subject to options, (2) the dates on which options become exercisable and (3) the expiration date of each option (which may not exceed ten years from the date of grant). The minimum per share purchase price of options granted under the Plan for Incentive Stock Options and Non-Qualified Options is the fair market value (as defined in the Plan) on the date the option is granted.
ACL SEMICONDUCTORS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Optionees will have no voting, dividend or other rights as stockholders with respect to shares of Common Stock covered by options prior to becoming the holders of record of such shares. The purchase price upon the exercise of options may be paid in cash, by certified bank or cashier’s check, by tendering stock held by the Optionee, as well as by cashless exercise either through the surrender of other shares subject to the option or through a broker. The total number of shares of Common Stock available under the Plan, and the number of shares and per share exercise price under outstanding options will be appropriately adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, reorganization, merger or recapitalization or similar corporate event.
The Board of Directors may at any time terminate the Plan or from time to time make such modifications or amendments to the Plan as it may deem advisable and the Board of Directors or Committee may adjust, reduce, cancel and regrant an unexercised option if the fair market value declines below the exercise price except as may be required by any national stock exchange or national market association on which the Common Stock is then listed. In no event may the Board of Directors without the approval of stockholders, amend the Plan if required by any federal, state, local or foreign laws or regulations or any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted and the applicable laws of any other country or jurisdiction where options or stock purchase rights are granted under the Plan.
Subject to limitations set forth in the Plan, the terms of option agreements will be determined by the Board of Directors or Committee, and need not be uniform among Optionees.
There were no options outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
NOTE 7. Related Party Transactions
Related party receivables are payable on demand upon the same terms as receivables from unrelated parties.
Transactions with Mr. Yang
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had an outstanding receivable from Mr. Yang, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, majority shareholder and a director, totaling $39,633 and $39,633, respectively.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded and paid $465,385 and $180,026 respectively, to Mr. Yang as compensation.
Transactions with Classic Electronics Ltd.
Mr. Ben Wong, a director of ACL, owns 99.9% of the equity of Classic Electronics Ltd. (“Classic”). The remaining 0.1% of Classic is owned by a non-related party. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had outstanding accounts receivable from Classic totaling $1,717,320 and $1,717,320, respectively. This account receivable has been outstanding for more than 12 months.
Classic has historically met its payment obligations to the Company and the Company has no reason to believe that Classic’s receivables are not collectible. Pursuant to a written personal guarantee agreement, Mr. Yang has personally guaranteed up to $10.0 million of the outstanding accounts receivable from Classic. The Company has received verbal assurances from Mr. Yang of his intent and ability to perform under the above-referenced guarantee and based on information provided by Mr. Yang, his net worth is approximately $17 million. In addition, as discussed in Note 13, the Company has entered into a payment plan with Classic, which payment plan contains a “due on demand” clause.
10
ACL SEMICONDUCTORS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Transactions with Solution Semiconductor (China) Ltd.
Mr. Yang is a director and the sole beneficial owner of the equity interests of Solution Semiconductor (China) Ltd. (“Solution”). On April 1, 2007, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Solution pursuant to which the Company leases one facility. The lease agreement for this facility expires on March 31, 2009. The Company’s monthly lease payment under this lease is $1,090. The Company incurred and paid to Solution an aggregate rent expense of $3,270 and $3,270 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Two facilities located in Hong Kong owned by Solution were used by the Company as collateral for loans from DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited (“DBS Bank”) (formerly Overseas Trust Bank Limited) and Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited (“Standard Chartered Bank”) respectively.
Transactions with Systematic Information Ltd.
Mr. Yang is a director and the sole beneficial owner of the equity interests of Systematic Information Ltd. (“Systematic Information”). On September 1, 2008, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Systematic Information pursuant to which the Company leases office space for a monthly rent of $641. The lease agreement for this property expires on August 31, 2010. The aggregate rent expense was $1,923 and $1,923 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were outstanding accounts payable due to Systematic Information totaling $166,000 and $0, respectively.
A workshop located in Hong Kong owned by Systematic Information was used by the Company as collateral for loans from Standard Chartered Bank.
Transactions with Systematic Semiconductor Ltd.
Mr. Yang is the sole beneficial owner of the equity interests of Systematic Semiconductor Ltd. (“Systematic Semiconductor”). During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company received management fees of $3,846 and $3,846, respectively, from Systematic Semiconductor. There were no outstanding accounts receivable due from Systematic Semiconductor as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The management fees were charged as the back office support to Systematic Semiconductor.
Transactions with Aristo Technologies Ltd.
Mr. Yang is the sole beneficial owner of the equity interests of Aristo Technologies Ltd. (“Aristo”). During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company sold $2,238,249 and $1,764,493 respectively, of memory products to Aristo. Outstanding accounts receivable due from Aristo totaled $8,953,237 and $6,695,409 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company purchased $0 and $7,117,103, respectively, of memory products from Aristo. There were no outstanding accounts payable to Aristo as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Aristo has historically met its payment obligations to the Company and the Company has no reason to believe that Aristo’s receivables are not collectible. In addition, as discussed in Note 13, the Company entered into a payment plan with Aristo according to which the outstanding balance of accounts receivable will be paid over the course of 2010 which payment plan contains a “due on demand” clause.
Transactions with Aristo Components Ltd.
Mr. Ben Wong is a 90% shareholder of Aristo Components Ltd. (“Aristo Comp”). During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company received management fees of $2,692 from Aristo Comp. There were no outstanding accounts receivable due from Aristo Comp as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The management fee was charged as back office support for Aristo Comp.
11
ACL SEMICONDUCTORS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Transactions with City Royal Limited
Mr. Yang is a 50% shareholder of City Royal Limited (“City”). The remaining 50% of City is owned by the wife of Mr. Yang. A residential property located in Hong Kong owned by City was used by the Company as collateral for loans from DBS Bank.
NOTE 8. Bank Facilities
With respect to all of the debt and credit arrangements referred to in this Note 8 and Note 9, the Company pledged its assets to a bank group in Hong Kong comprised of DBS Bank, BEA and Standard Chartered Bank, as collateral for all current and future borrowings from the bank group by the Company. In addition to the above pledged collateral, the debt is also secured by:
| 1. | For loans from DBS Bank, a fixed cash deposit of $641,026 (HKD$5,000,000), a security interest on two residential properties and a workshop located in Hong Kong owned by Atlantic, a security interest on a residential property located in Hong Kong owned by City, a security interest on a workshop located in Hong Kong owned by Solution, plus a personal guarantee of Mr. Yang; |
|
| 2. | For loans from BEA, a fixed cash deposit of $1,380,010 (HK$10,764,075) plus an unlimited personal guarantee of Mr. Yang; |
|
| 3. | For loans from Standard Chartered Bank, a fixed cash deposit of $2,051,282 (HK$16,000,000), a security interest on a workshop located in Hong Kong owned by Systematic Information, a security interest on a workshop located in Hong Kong owned by Solution, plus an unlimited personal guarantee of Mr. Yang. |
The summary of banking facilities at March 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | Not utilized |
| | | Granted facilities | | | Utilized facilities | | | facilities |
|
Overdraft | | $ | 153,846 | | $ | - | | $ | 153,846 |
Installment Loan | | | 2,776,923 | | | 2,482,355 | | | 294,568 |
Factoring Loan | | | 10,897,436 | | | 1,671,241 | | | 9,226,195 |
Import/Export Loan | | | 13,846,153 | | | 10,648,710 | | | 3,197,443 |
Letter of Guarantee | | | 384,615 | | | 384,615 | | | - |
|
| | $ | 28,058,973 | | $ | 15,186,921 | | $ | 12,872,052 |
With the exception of the $384,615 letter of guarantee issued by DBS Bank, which will expire on 31 October, 2009, amounts borrowed by the Company under the revolving lines of credit described above are repayable within a period of three (3) months of drawdown. Other loan facilities repayable are referred to in Note 9 – Long Term Debt.
12
ACL SEMICONDUCTORS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 9. Long Term Debt
Long Term Debt consisted of the following at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
| | Date of Maturity | | | March 31, 2009 | | | December 31, 2008 |
Installment loan to DBS bank | | | | | | | | |
payable in monthly | | | | | | | | |
installments of $9,663 | | | | | | | | |
including interest at 2.75% | | July 2026 | | $ | 1,629,358 | | $ | 1,648,222 |
below the Hong Kong dollar | | | | | | | | |
Prime Rate | | | | | | | | |
|
Installment loan to DBS bank | | | | | | | | |
payable in monthly | | | | | | | | |
installments of $3,782 | | | | | | | | |
including interest at 2% | | July 2011 | | | 101,838 | | | 112,312 |
below the Hong Kong dollar | | | | | | | | |
Prime Rate | | | | | | | | |
|
Installment loan to DBS bank | | | | | | | | |
payable in monthly | | | | | | | | |
installments of $5,240 | | | | | | | | |
including interest at 2.5% | | July 2023 | | | 751,046 | | | 761,624 |
below the Hong Kong dollar | | | | | | | | |
Prime Rate | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 2,482,242 | | | 2,522,158 |
|
Less: current maturities | | | | | 161,544 | | | 160,447 |
|
| | | | $ | 2,320,698 | | $ | 2,361,711 |
|
An analysis of long-term debt as of March 31, 2009 | | | | | | |
and December 31, 2008 is as follows: | | | | | | |
|
Current portion | | | | $ | 161,544 | | $ | 160,447 |
|
After 1 year, but within 2 years | | | | | 306,740 | | | 316,063 |
After 2 years, but within 5 years | | | | | 259,374 | | | 257,789 |
After 5 years | | | | | 1,754,584 | | | 1,787,859 |
| | | | | 2,320,698 | | | 2,361,711 |
|
| | | | $ | 2,482,242 | | $ | 2,522,158 |
13
ACL SEMICONDUCTORS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 10. Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
| | | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | 2009 | | | 2008 |
Interest | | $ | 166,892 | | $ | 223,827 |
Income taxes | | $ | - | | $ | - |
|
Non-Cash Activities: | | | | | | |
Income tax provision | | $ | 217,949 | | $ | - |
NOTE 11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value measurements are determined under a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value, distinguishing between market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (“observable inputs”) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (“unobservable inputs”).
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or would be paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, we primarily use prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets (“market approach”). We also consider the impact of a significant decrease in volume and level of activity for an asset or liability when compared with normal activity to identify transactions that are not orderly.
The highest priority is given to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Securities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
| The three hierarchy levels are defined as follows: |
| | |
| Level 1 - | Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; |
| | |
| Level 2 - | Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; |
| | |
| Level 3 - | Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
Credit risk adjustments are applied to reflect the company’s own credit risk when valuing all liabilities measured at fair value. The methodology is consistent with that applied in developing counterparty credit risk adjustments, but incorporates the company’s own credit risk as observed in the credit default swap market.
14
ACL SEMICONDUCTORS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2009:
| | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 897,296 | | | - | | | - | | | 897,296 |
Restricted cash | | | 4,072,317 | | | - | | | - | | | 4,072,317 |
Total assets | | $ | 4,969,613 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 4,969,613 |
NOTE 12. Derivative instruments
On February 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS 161 as referenced in Note 1. The adoption of SFAS 161 requires additional disclosures about the Company’s objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments, the accounting for the derivative instruments and related hedged items under SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"), and the effect of derivative instruments and related hedged items on the financial statements. The adoption had no financial impact on the consolidated condensed financial statements.
Since all of the Company sales are done in USD, the bank is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in the normal course of its business. As part of its risk management strategy, the Company purchases FX forward contracts from the banks to secure the exchange rate for a period of time in order to hedge any FX exposure between HKD and USD throughout the purchase and sale period. The Company applies hedge accounting based upon the criteria established by SFAS 133, whereby the Company designates its derivatives as cash flow hedges. Cash flows from the derivative programs were classified as operating activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
As of March 31, 2009, there is a participating forward currency option agreement between the Company and Standard Chartered Bank for the Company to buy US$500,000 from Standard Chartered Bank at a contract rate of 7.735 at specified dates up to January 7, 2010 for settlement with the bank on a monthly basis. According to the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to buy USD in triple amounts if the spot rate is less than the contract rate at settlement dates. The gain on this forward contract during the year ended December 31, 2008 was $36,346 and has been recorded in “Net income on cashflow hedge” under “Other income (expenses)”.
As of March 31, 2009, the target redemption forward currency option agreement between the Company and Standard Chartered Bank for the Company to buy US$750,000 from Standard Chartered Bank at a lower strike contract rate of 7.75 and an upper strike contract rate of 7.85 at specified dates up to April 29, 2010 for settlement with the bank on a monthly basis has matured and terminated on January 29, 2009. According to the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to buy USD in triple amounts if the spot rate is less than the lower strike contract rate or greater than the upper strike contract rate at settlement dates. The gain on this forward contract has been recorded in “Net income on cashflow hedge” under “Other income (expenses)”.
As of March 31, 2009, there is a pivot bonus forward currency option agreement between the Company and Standard Chartered Bank for the Company to buy US$1,000,000 from Standard Chartered Bank at a lower strike contract rate of 7.73 and an upper strike contract rate 7.749 at specified dates up to July 2, 2009 for settlement with the bank on a monthly basis. According to the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to buy in triple amounts if the spot rate is less than the lower strike contract rate at settlement date. The gain on this forward contract during the year ended December 31, 2008 was $56,410 and has been recorded in “Net income on cashflow hedge” under “Other income (expenses)”.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company has holdings of US$500,000 Commodity Basket Linked Notes which were issued by Standard Chartered Bank at specified dates up to February 17, 2009. According to the terms of agreements, the Company agreed to receive interest at a rate equal to 6% if the Basket Return is larger than 0% and 100% redeemed if the Basket Return is less than or equal to 0% on the maturity date. The Company fully redeemed the securities at cost value on the maturity date of February 17, 2009
15
ACL SEMICONDUCTORS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The gross notional and fair value of derivative financial instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2009 were as follows:
| | As of March 31, 2009 |
| | | Gross | | Other | | Long-term | | Other | | Other |
| | | Notional(1) | | Current | | Financing | | Accrued | | Liabilities |
| | | | | Assets | | Receivables | | Liabilities | | |
| | | | | | | and | | | | |
| | | | | | | Other Assets | | | | |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | | | | |
under SFAS 133 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign exchange contracts | | $ | 2,250,000 | | - | | - | | - | | - |
Total derivatives not designated as hedging | | | | | | | | | | | |
instruments under SFAS 133 | | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - |
|
Total derivatives | | $ | 2,250,000 | | - | | - | | - | | - |
(1) | Represents the face amounts of contracts that were outstanding as of March 31, 2009. |
The before-tax effect of derivative instruments in cash flow and net investment hedging relationships for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | Gain (Loss) | | Gain (Loss) Reclassified from | | Gain Recognized in |
| | Recognized | | | | | | | | | | |
| | in | | Accumulated OCI Into Income | | Income on Derivative(1) |
| | OCI on | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Derivative | | (Effective Portion) | | | | | |
| | (Effective | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Portion) | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three | | | | | Three | | | | | |
| | months | | | | | months | | | | | Three months |
| | ended | | | | | ended | | | | | ended |
| | March 31, | | | | | March 31, | | | | | March 31, |
| | 2009 | | Location | | | 2009 | | Location | | | 2009 |
|
Cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Foreign exchange contracts | | | | | | | | | | | | |
US$500,000 | | | | Interest and other, net | | | | | Interest and other, net | | | 3,705 |
Foreign exchange contracts | | | | | | | | | | | | |
USD750,000 | | | | Interest and other, net | | | | | Interest and other, net | | | 1,259 |
Foreign exchange contracts | | | | | | | | | | | | |
US$1,000,000 | | | | Interest and other, net | | | | | Interest and other, net | | | 15,385 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cash flow hedges | $ | - | | | | $ | - | | | | $ | 20,349 |
16
ACL SEMICONDUCTORS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 13. Subsequent Events
Effective as of October 1, 2009, Classic, a related party, and the Company agreed to a payment plan for the pay down of accounts receivable from Classic of $1,717,320 as of March 31, 2009 according to which Classic has agreed to pay to the Company $650,000 before the end of 2009 with the remainder of the accounts receivable balance to be paid during 2010. Mr. Alan Yang, our Chief Executive Officer, director and majority stockholder has personally guaranteed up to $10 million of outstanding accounts receivable of Classic.
Effective as of October 1, 2009, Aristo, a related party, and the Company agreed to a payment plan for the pay down of accounts receivable from Aristo that have aged more than 90 days according to which Aristo has agreed to pay to the Company over the course of 2010. Mr. Alan Yang, our Chief Executive Officer, director and majority stockholder is the sole beneficial owner of Aristo.
On November 2, 2009, the Company entered into two leases for office space. The leases expire on November 30, 2014. The monthly lease payments are $4,487 and $7,051, respectively.
17
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion highlights the principal factors that have affected our financial condition and results of operations as well as our liquidity and capital resources for the periods described.
The information contained in this Form 10-Q is intended to update the information contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended, (the “Form 10-K”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and presumes that readers have access to, and will have read, the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation,” our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and other information contained in the Form 10-K. The following discussion and analysis also should be read together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
Forward-Looking Statements
Information included in this Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements. Except for the historical information contained in this discussion of the business and the discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, the matters discussed herein are forward looking statements. These forward looking statements include but are not limited to the Company’s plans for sales growth and expectations of gross margin, expenses, new product introduction, and the Company’s liquidity and capital needs. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. In addition to the risks and uncertainties described in “Risk Factors” contained in the Form 10-K, these risks and uncertainties may include consumer trends, business cycles, scientific developments, changes in governmental policy and regulation, currency fluctuations, economic trends in the United States and inflation. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that may be incorrect, and there can be no assurance that any projections or other expectations included in any forward-looking statements will come to pass. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Except as required by applicable laws, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
Company Overview and Background
The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Atlantic Components Limited, a Hong Kong corporation (“Atlantic”), is engaged primarily in the business of distribution of memory products under the “Samsung” brand name which principally comprise DRAM, Graphic RAM and FLASH for the Hong Kong and Southern China markets. The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Alpha Perform Technology Limited (“Alpha”), which previously engaged in this business, ceased activities as of January 1, 2004, and all its operations were consolidated with those of Atlantic.
As of March 31, 2009, ACL had more than 150 active customers in Hong Kong and Southern China.
ACL is in the mature stage of operations. As a result, the relationships between sales, cost of sales, and operating expenses reflected in the financial information included in this document to a large extent represent future expected financial relationships. Much of the cost of sales and operating expenses reflected in the Company’s financial statements are recurring in nature.
18
Overview
Net sales
Sales from Samsung HK are recognized upon the transfer of legal title of the electronic components to the customers. The quantities of memory products the Company sells fluctuate with changes in demand from its customers. The suggested prices set by Samsung HK that the Company charge its customers are subject to change by the Company based on prevailing economic conditions and their impact on the market.
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (sometimes referred to as “2009 1Q”) were $61,420,627, representing an increase of 16%, or $8,512,120, compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (sometimes referred to as “2008 1Q”). The sales increase was primarily driven by the larger demand for Samsung’s products as an ongoing reduction in production capacities was observed among Samsung’s competitors - Hynix and other first tier memory makers such as Elpida and Micron.
The Company’s gross profit for 2009 1Q was $2,665,724, representing a 412% increase compared to $520,171 for 2008 1Q. The gross profit margin for the Company for 2009 1Q was 4.34%, compared to 0.98% for 2008 1Q. The increases in gross profit and gross profit margin were mainly attributed to sales price increases as the memory components market recovers after the prevailing oversupply condition observed last year. In addition, our lower purchase cost base from Samsung helped improve our gross profit margin as Samsung has significantly increased its 56nm DRAM, 35nm and 42nm NAND flash output volumes. The production output level of the first tier memory makers has remained steady thus far, while the memory makers’ inventory level has gradually returned to a normal level. Manufacturers began to place secure orders with suppliers in the beginning of 2009 1Q as they worry about potential supply shortages. These orders had driven up prices in the market as the Company recorded an average price increase of approximately 70-80% for flash products due to the increasing demand for consumer electronics products and 40-50% for graphics products because of the bankruptcy of Qimonda. As a result, the combined effects of our higher selling prices and lower purchase cost base have greatly increased the Company’s gross profit as well as its gross profit margin.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales consists of costs of goods purchased from Samsung HK, and purchases from other Samsung authorized distributors. Many factors affect the Company’s gross margin, including, but not limited to, the volume of production orders placed on behalf of its customers, the competitiveness of the memory products industry and the availability of cheaper Samsung memory products from overseas Samsung distributors due to regional demand and supply situations. Nevertheless, the Company’s procurement operations are supported by Samsung HK pursuant to a distributorship agreement between the Company and Samsung HK. However, the distributorship is for a one-year period and even though it has been renewed more than 10 times, there is no assurance that it will be renewed again in the future.
Operating expenses
The Company’s operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were comprised of sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses only.
Sales and marketing expenses consisted primarily of costs associated with advertising and marketing activities.
General and administrative expenses include all corporate and administrative functions that serve to support the Company’s current and future operations and provide an infrastructure to support future growth. Major items in this category include management and staff salaries, rent/leases, professional services, and travel and entertainment. The Company expects these expenses to increase as a result of increased legal and accounting fees anticipated in connection with the Company’s compliance with ongoing reporting and accounting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and as a result of anticipated expansion by the Company of its business operations. Sales and marketing expenses are expected to fluctuate as a percentage of sales due to the addition of sales personnel and various marketing activities planned throughout the year.
Interest expense, including finance charges, relates primarily to Atlantic’s short-term and long-term bank borrowings and capital lease obligations, which the Company intends to reduce.
19
Results of Operations]
| | | Three Months Ended | |
| | | March 31, | | | | March 31, | |
| | | 2009 | | | | 2008 | |
Net sales | | $ | 61,420,627 | | | $ | 52,908,507 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | | 58,754,903 | | | | 52,388,336 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,665,724 | | | | 520,171 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses | | | | | | | | |
Selling | | | 19,418 | | | | 17,777 | |
General and administrative | | | 1,287,689 | | | | 774,797 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 1,358,617 | | | | (272,403 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Other income (expenses) | | | (95,743 | ) | | | (329,377 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes provision | | | 1,262,874 | | | | (601,780 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Income taxes provision | | | 217,949 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 1,044,925 | | | $ | (601,780 | ) |
Earnings per share - basic and diluted | | $ | 0.04 | | | $ | (0.02 | ) |
Net Sales
The following table presents our net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
Three Months Ended March 31, | | |
2009 | | 2008 | | % Change |
|
$ 61,420,627 | | $ 52,908,507 | | 16.1% |
Net sales increased by $8,512,120, or 16.1%, from $52,908,507 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $61,420,627 in the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase was primarily driven by the larger demand for Samsung’s products as well as ongoing reduction in production capacities.
Cost of sales
The following table presents our cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
Three Months Ended March 31, | | |
2009 | | 2008 | | % Change |
|
$ 58,754,903 | | $ 52,388,336 | | 12.2% |
Cost of sales increased by $6,366,567, or 12.2%, from $52,388,336 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $58,754,903 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase in cost of sales is in proportion to the increase in net sales stated above.
20
Gross Profit | | | | |
| | |
Three Months Ended March 31, | | |
2009 | | 2008 | | % Change |
$ 2,665,724 | | $ 520,171 | | 412.5% |
Gross profit increased by $2,145,553, or 412%, from $520,171 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $2,665,724 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase in gross profits resulted primarily from the significant price rebound as the memory components market recovers after the prevailing oversupply condition observed last year and the Company maintained the lower purchase cost for products supplied by Samsung when the products’ market price experienced sales price increases during the first quarter of 2009.
Sales and Marketing
The following table presents the sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
Three Months Ended March 31, | | |
2009 | | 2008 | | % Change |
|
$ 19,418 | | $ 17,777 | | 9.2% |
Sales and marketing expenses increased by $1,641, or 9.2%, from $17,777 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $19,418 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Such increase was directly attributable to and reflective of an increased sales and marketing effort by the Company.
General and Administrative
Three Months Ended March 31, | | |
2009 | | 2008 | | % Change |
|
$ 1,287,689 | | $ 774,797 | | 66.2% |
The following table presents the general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
General and administrative expenses increased $512,892, or 66.2%, from $774,797 in the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $1,287,689 in the three months ended March 31, 2009. This increase was principally attributable to an increase in directors’ remuneration and staff salaries.
Income from Operations
The following table presents the income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
Three Months Ended March 31, | | |
2009 | | 2008 | | % Change |
|
$ 1,358,617 | | $ (272,403) | | 598.8% |
Income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased by $1,631,020 from a loss of $272,403 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $1,358,617 in the three months ended March 31, 2009. This increase was the result of an increase of gross profit during the first quarter of 2009.
21
Interest Income
The following table presents the interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
Three Months Ended March 31, | | |
2009 | | 2008 | | % Change |
|
$ 4,922 | | $ 27,403 | | -82.0% |
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, interest income decreased $22,481, or 82%, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008. These decreases in interest income for both comparative periods were due to a reduction in interest from restricted cash and lower interest rates.
Interest Expense
The following table presents the interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
Three Months Ended March 31, | | |
2009 | | 2008 | | % Change |
|
$ 166,892 | | $ 223,827 | | -25.4% |
Interest expense decreased by $56,935, or 25.4%, from $223,827 in the three months ended March 31, 2008, to $166,892 in the three months ended March 31, 2009. This decrease was mainly due to a decrease in the Company’s use of “line of credit borrowing” by two bank facilities that were canceled during the first quarter of 2009.
Net Income on Cash Flow Hedge
The following table presents the net income on cash flow hedge for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
Three Months Ended March 31, | | |
2009 | | 2008 | | % Change |
|
$ 20,349 | | $ 45,115 | | -54.9% |
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, income on cash flow hedge decreased by $24,766, or 54.9%, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008. The decreases were due to the expiration or termination of several currency hedging contracts in 2009.
Income Tax Provision
The following table presents the income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
Three Months Ended March 31, | | |
2009 | | 2008 | | % Change |
|
$ 217,949 | | $ - | | N/A |
Income tax provision increased by $217,949 from $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $217,949 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase was due to an increase in the estimated Hong Kong taxes payable by Atlantic.
22
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s principal sources of liquidity have been cash from operations, bank lines of credit and credit terms from suppliers. The Company’s principal uses of cash have been for operations and working capital. The Company anticipates these uses will continue to be its principal uses of cash in the future.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company had revolving lines of credit and loan facilities in the aggregate amount of $28,058,973, of which $12,577,484 was available, representing an approximately 9% reduction in the Company’s borrowing lines of credit from December 31, 2008, which reduction was attributable to the termination of two lines of credit with two banks in the aggregate amount of $2,756,411. In connection therewith, $1,097,435 of restricted bank deposits were released to the Company. Other detailed disclosures on credit facilities are made in Note 8 and Note 9 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, including the amounts of facilities, outstanding balances, maturity date, and pledges of assets.
The Company’s ability to draw down under its various credit and loan facilities is, in each case, subject to the ongoing willingness of the relevent lending institution to make advances thereunder, and security coverage ratios as required from time to time and each facility (other than with respect to certain long term mortgage loans) is payable within 90 days of drawdown. As a result of the general tightening of credit markets in Hong Kong and Asia, many lenders have revised the terms of their revolving credit lines to levels the Company did not deem commercially reasonable. Accordingly, on a case by case basis, the Company has elected to terminate or not renew several of its credit facilities resulting in a significant reduction in the Company’s available short term borrowings.
To address the reduction in available credit facilities, the Company is relying on its own cash reserves and cash flows from operations to fund its ongoing operations and has tightened the credit terms it extends to its customers. As a result, the Company does not expect that the reduction in available credit facilities is going to have a materially adverse impact upon its operations for the foreseeable future.
The Company will continue to seek additional sources of available financing on acceptable terms; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis or on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, if the results are negatively impacted and delayed as a result of political and economic factors beyond management’s control, our capital requirements may increase.
The short-term borrowings from banks to finance the cash flow required to finance the purchase of Samsung memory products from Samsung HK must be made a day in advance of the release of goods from Samsung HK’s warehouse before receiving payments from customers upon physical delivery of such goods in Hong Kong which, in most instances, take approximately two days from the date of such delivery.
The following factors, among others, could have negative impacts on the Company’s results of operations and financial position: the termination or change in terms of the Distributorship Agreement; pricing pressures in the industry; a continued downturn in the economy in general or in the memory products sector; an unexpected decrease in demand for Samsung’s memory products; the Company’s ability to attract new customers; an increase in competition in the memory products market; and the ability of some of the Company’s customers to obtain financing.
Although the Company believes its expectations of future growth are reasonable, it cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. The Company is under no duty to update our expectations to conform them to actual results or to reflect changes in expectations.
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
In the three months ended March 31, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities was $1,705,436 while in the three months ended March 31, 2008, net cash used for operating activities was $194,582, an increase of $1,900,018. This increase was primarily due to an increase of accounts receivable and accounts payable.
Net Cash Used Provided by Investing Activities
In the three months ended March 31, 2009, net cash provided by investing activities was $1,597,394, while in the three months ended March 31, 2008, net cash provided by investing activities was $192,330, an increase of $1,405,064. This increase was mainly due to a decrease of restricted cash and restricted securities due to cancellation of two bank lines of credit.
23
Net Cash Used for Financing Activities
In the three months ended March 31, 2009, net cash used for financing activities was $4,189,889, while in the three months ended March 31, 2008, net cash used for financing activities was $343,121, a decrease of $3,846,768. This decrease was primarily due to the repayments of bank borrowings.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of ACL Semiconductors Inc. include the accounts of Atlantic Components Ltd., a Hong Kong subsidiary and Alpha Perform Technology Limited, a BVI subsidiary. All significant inter-company transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
Critical Accounting Polices
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recently issued Financial Reporting Release No. 60, “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies” (“FRR 60”), suggesting companies provide additional disclosure and commentary on their most critical accounting policies. In FRR 60, the SEC defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and operating results, and require management to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, ACL’s most critical accounting policies include: inventory valuation, which affects cost of sales and gross margin; policies for revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, and stock-based compensation. The methods, estimates and judgments ACL uses in applying these most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results ACL reports in its consolidated financial statements.
Inventory Valuation.
ACL’s policy is to value inventories at the lower of cost or market on a part-by-part basis. This policy requires ACL to make estimates regarding the market value of its inventories, including an assessment of excess or obsolete inventories. ACL determines excess and obsolete inventories based on an estimate of the future demand for its products within a specified time horizon, generally 12 months. The estimates ACL uses for demand are also used for near-term capacity planning and inventory purchasing and are consistent with its revenue forecasts. If ACL’s demand forecast is greater than its actual demand it may be required to take additional excess inventory charges, which will decrease gross margin and net operating results in the future.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.
ACL maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of ACL’s customers to make required payments. ACL’s allowance for doubtful accounts is based on ACL’s assessment of the collectability of specific customer accounts, the aging of accounts receivable, ACL’s history of bad debts, and the general condition of the industry. If a major customer’s credit worthiness deteriorates, or ACL’s customers’ actual defaults exceed ACL’s historical experience, ACL’s estimates could change and impact ACL’s reported results.
24
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of this Form 10-Q, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. This evaluation was retrospective and conducted as of March 31, 2009, the last day of the fiscal quarter covered by this Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2009 because we have not completed the remediation discussed elsewhere in this Item 4T of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Our management has concluded that there are material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting. These weaknesses include:
Company-level controls. We did not maintain effective company-level controls as defined in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework published by COSO. These deficiencies related to each of the five components of internal control as defined by COSO (control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring). These deficiencies resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected. Specifically,
Our control environment did not sufficiently promote effective internal control over financial reporting throughout ourorganizational structure, and this material weakness was a contributing factor to the other material weaknesses described in thisItem 4T;
Our board of directors has not established adequate financial reporting monitoring activities to mitigate the risk of managementoverride, specifically:
| — | none of our board of directors is independent; |
| — | no financial expert on our board of directors has been designated; |
| — | no formally documented financial analysis is presented to our board of directors, specifically fluctuation, variance, trend analysis or business performance reviews; |
| — | an effective whistleblower program has not been established; |
| — | there is insufficient oversight of external audit specifically related to fees, scope of activities, executive sessions, and monitoring of results; |
| — | there is insufficient oversight of accounting principle implementation; |
| — | there is insufficient review of related party transactions; and |
| ��� | there is insufficient review of recording of stock transactions. |
We have not maintained sufficient competent evidence to support the effective operation of our internal controls over financialreporting, specifically related to our board of directors’ oversight of quarterly and annual SEC filings; and management’s review ofSEC filings, journal entries, account analyses and reconciliations, and critical spreadsheet controls;
We had inadequate risk assessment controls, including inadequate mechanisms for anticipating and identifying financial reportingrisks; and for reacting to changes in the operating environment that could have a material effect on financial reporting;
There was inadequate communication from management to employees regarding the general importance of controls and employeesduties and control responsibilities;
25
We had inadequate monitoring controls, including inadequate staffing and procedures to ensure periodic evaluations of internalcontrols to ensure that appropriate personnel regularly obtain evidence that controls are functioning effectively and that identifiedcontrol deficiencies are remediated timely;
We had an inadequate number of trained finance and accounting personnel with appropriate expertise in U.S. generally acceptedaccounting principles. Accordingly, in certain circumstances, an effective secondary review of technical accounting matters wasnot performed;
We had inadequate controls over our management information systems related to program changes, segregation of duties, andaccess controls;
We had inadequate access and change controls over end-user computing spreadsheets. Specifically, our controls over thecompleteness, accuracy, validity and restricted access and review of certain spreadsheets used in the period-end financial statementpreparation and reporting process were not designed appropriately or did not operate as designed; and
We were unable to assess effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in a timely matter.
Financial statement preparation and review procedures. We had inadequate policies, procedures and personnel to ensure that accurate, reliable interim and annual consolidated financial statements were prepared and reviewed on a timely basis. Specifically, we had insufficient: a) levels of supporting documentation; b) review and supervision within the accounting and finance departments; c) preparation and review of footnote disclosures accompanying our financial statements; and d) technical accounting resources. These deficiencies resulted in errors in the financial statements and more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
Inadequate reviews of account reconciliations, analyses and journal entries.We had inadequate review procedures over account reconciliations, account and transaction analyses, and journal entries. Specifically, deficiencies were noted in the following areas: a) management review of supporting documentation, calculations and assumptions used to prepare the financial statements, including spreadsheets and account analyses; and b) management review of journal entries recorded during the financial statement preparation process. These deficiencies resulted in a more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
Inadequate controls over purchases and disbursements. We had inadequate controls over the segregation of duties and authorization of purchases, and the disbursement of funds. These weaknesses increase the likelihood that misappropriation of assets and/or unauthorized purchases and disbursements could occur and not be detected in a timely manner. These deficiencies resulted in errors in the financial statements and in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected. Specifically,
We had inadequate procedures and controls to ensure proper segregation of duties within our purchasing and disbursementsprocesses and accounting systems;
We had inadequate procedures and controls to ensure proper authorization of purchase orders; and
We had inadequate approvals for payment of invoices and wire transfers.
As of March 31, 2009, we had not completed the remediation of any of these material weaknesses. In addition, we failed to furnish our management report on internal control over financial reporting for the periods ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 in a timely manner which renders our disclosure controls and procedures ineffective.
We are addressing the outstanding material weaknesses described above, as well as our control environment. We also expect to undertake the following remediation efforts:
We plan to evaluate the composition of our board of directors and to determine whether to add independent directors or to replace aninside director with an independent director, in both cases, in order to have a majority of our board of directors become independent;
We plan on drafting quarterly financial statement variance analysis of actual versus budget with relevant explanations of variancesfor distribution to our board of directors.
26
We are in the process of developing, documenting, and communicating a formal whistleblower program to employees. We expectto post the policy on the Company web site in the governance section and in the common areas in the office. We plan on providing a toll freenumber for reporting complaints and will hire a specific third party whistleblower company to monitor the hotline and providemonthly reports of activity to our board of directors.
Management intends to continue to provide SEC and US GAAP training for employees and retain external consultants withappropriate SEC and US GAAP expertise to assist in financial statement review, account analysis review, review and filing of SECreports, policy and procedure compilation assistance, and other related advisory services.
We intend on developing an internal control over financial reporting evidence policy and procedures which contemplates, amongother items, a listing of all identified key internal controls over financial reporting, assignment of responsibility to process ownerswithin the Company, communication of such listing to all applicable personnel, and specific policies and procedures around thenature and retention of evidence of the operation of controls.
We intend on undertaking a restricted access review to analyze all financial modules and the list of persons authorized to have editaccess to each. We will remove or add authorized personnel as appropriate to mitigate the risks of management or other override.
We plan to re-assign roles and responsibilities in order to improve segregation of duties.
These specific actions are part of an overall program that we are currently developing in an effort to remediate the material weaknesses described above. We likely will not have sufficient time to implement our remediation plan before testing our internal control over financial reporting for our current fiscal year that will end December 31, 2009.
Attached as exhibits to this report are certifications of our CEO and CFO, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The discussion above in this Item 4T includes information concerning the controls and controls evaluation referred to in the certifications and those certifications should be read in conjunction with this Item 4T for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
We are committed to improving our internal control processes and will continue to diligently review our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures. The failure to implement adequate controls may result in deficient and inaccurate reports under the Exchange Act.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Except as described above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
27
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, in our Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Item 5. Other Information
None
28
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits:
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
| 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
| 32.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| ACL SEMICONDUCTORS INC. |
|
|
Date: January 6, 2010 | By: | /s/Chung-Lun Yang | |
| | Chung-Lun Yang |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Date: January 6, 2010 | By: | /s/ Kenneth Lap-Yin Chan | |
| | Kenneth Lap-Yin Chan |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
30