Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Quarterly Reporting [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Quarterly Reporting—The Company recognizes revenues and operating expenses for all events in the calendar quarter in which conducted. Changes in race schedules at the Company's speedways from time to time, including speedway acquisitions, can lessen the comparability of operating results between quarterly financial statements of successive years and increase or decrease the seasonal nature of its motorsports business. |
|
The more significant racing schedule changes for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to 2012 include: |
|
• | AMS held one NASCAR Camping World Truck Series racing event in the third quarter 2012 that was not held in 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | KyS held one Automobile Racing Club of America racing event in the third quarter 2013 that was not held in 2012, and one NASCAR Camping World Truck Series racing event in the third quarter 2012 that was not held in 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling And Marketing [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Marketing Agreements—The Company had one facility naming rights agreement that renamed Sears Point Raceway as Infineon Raceway, which expired in the second quarter 2012. This naming rights agreement has provided significant contracted revenues over its ten-year term. However, the annual contracted revenue received by the Company under this agreement individually was not material. The facility has been renamed Sonoma Raceway |
Equity Method Investments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Joint Venture Equity Investment—The Company and International Speedway Corporation (ISC) equally own a joint venture (50% non-controlling interest) that operates independently under the name Motorsports Authentics (MA). MA's operations consist principally of trackside, and to a lesser extent wholesale and retail, event souvenir merchandising as licensed and regulated under certain NASCAR Teams Licensing Trust agreements. The NASCAR Trust has the ability to significantly influence MA’s operations and results. |
|
As further described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2012 Annual Report, the carrying value of our equity investment in MA was reduced to $0 as of December 31, 2009. Under equity method accounting, we are no longer recording our 50% share of MA operating losses, if any, unless and until this carrying value is increased from additional Company investments in MA or to the extent of future MA operating profits, if any. As such, our third quarter and year-to-date 2013 and 2012 results were not impacted by MA’s operations under the equity method. The following summarized financial information on MA’s operating results is presented for informational purposes (in thousands): |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Income Taxes—The Company provides for income taxes at the end of each interim period based on management’s best estimate of the annual estimated effective income tax rate. Cumulative adjustments to the Company’s annual estimated effective income tax rate are recorded in the interim period in which a change in the annual estimated effective income tax rate is determined. See Notes 2 and 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2012 Annual Report for additional information on our accounting for income taxes. |
|
The effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was 38.9% and 36.4%, respectively, excluding the negative impact of recording tax benefits of approximately $2.3 million related to the second quarter 2013 goodwill impairment charge of $89.0 million (a significant portion had no tax benefit) as further described in Note 4 and non-recurring benefits of state income tax restructuring and tax law changes. The effective income tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 reflect a non-recurring tax benefit of $1,667,000 resulting from certain state income tax law changes effective September 1, 2013. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 reflects a non-recurring tax benefit of $4,056,000 resulting from strategic state tax restructuring in the first quarter 2013. The Company’s effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 31.2% and 38.2%, respectively. |
|
Income tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits approximate $1,004,000 as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and are included in other noncurrent liabilities, all of which would favorably impact the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. Interest and penalties recognized on uncertain tax positions amounted to $18,000 for both the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and $55,000 for both the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had $825,000 and $771,000 accrued for the payment of interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions, which is included in other noncurrent liabilities. As of September 30, 2013, management was not aware of any significant tax positions where it appeared reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits might significantly increase within the next twelve months. The tax years that remain open to examination include 2006 through 2012 by the California Franchise Tax Board, and 2010 through 2012 by all other taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. The Company’s 2011 federal income tax return examination by the Internal Revenue Service has been concluded with its report subject to final review by The Joint Committee on Taxation of the United States Congress, with no material changes reflected in the IRS report. There was no change or activity for unrecognized tax benefits during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 or 2012. |
Taxes Collected From Customers [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Taxes Collected from Customers—The Company reports sales, admission and other taxes collected from customers on both a gross and net basis in operations. |
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Advertising Expenses—Event specific advertising costs are expensed when an associated event is held and included principally in direct expense of events. Non-event related advertising costs are expensed as incurred and included principally in other direct operating expense. Advertising expense amounted to $5,774,000 and $6,078,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and $14,369,000 and $15,434,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. There were no deferred direct-response advertising costs at September 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments—The Company follows applicable authoritative guidance which requires that financial and non-financial assets and liabilities measured and reported on a fair value basis be classified, disclosed and categorized as further described below. Fair value estimates are based on relevant market information and single broker quoted market prices where available at a specific point in time, and changes in assumptions or market conditions could significantly affect estimates. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, certain other assets and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these financial instruments. Cash surrender values are carried at fair value based on binding broker quoted market prices. Notes and other receivables and bank revolving credit facility and term loan borrowings are variable interest rate financial instruments and, therefore, carrying values approximate fair value. The fixed rate senior notes payable are publicly traded and estimated fair values are based on single broker quoted market prices. Other long-term debt is non-interest bearing and discounted based on estimated current cost of borrowings and, therefore, carrying values approximate market value. Quoted market prices are not available for determining market value of the Company’s equity investment in an associated entity. |
|
The following table presents estimated fair values and categorization levels of the Company’s financial instruments as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | 30-Sep-13 | | | 31-Dec-12 | |
| | Level | | Class | | Carrying Value | | | Fair Value | | | Carrying Value | | | Fair Value | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 1 | | R | | $ | 115,292 | | | $ | 115,292 | | | $ | 106,408 | | | $ | 106,408 | |
Floating rate notes receivable | | | 2 | | NR | | | 2,100 | | | | 2,100 | | | | 2,385 | | | | 2,385 | |
Cash surrender values | | | 2 | | NR | | | 4,849 | | | | 4,849 | | | | 4,621 | | | | 4,621 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Floating rate revolving Credit Facility, including Term Loan | | | 2 | | NR | | | 230,000 | | | | 230,000 | | | | 95,000 | | | | 95,000 | |
6¾% Senior Notes due 2019 | | | 1 | | NR | | | 254,404 | | | | 266,875 | | | | 150,000 | | | | 159,000 | |
8¾% Senior Notes previously due 2016 (Note 5) | | | 1 | | NR | | | - | | | | - | | | | 270,758 | | | | 292,875 | |
Other long-term debt | | | 2 | | NR | | $ | 3,485 | | | $ | 3,485 | | | $ | 5,501 | | | $ | 5,501 | |
|
Level 1: | Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 2: | Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 3: | Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class R: | Measured at fair value on recurring basis, subsequent to initial recognition. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class NR: | Measured at fair value on nonrecurring basis, subsequent to initial recognition. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commitments and Contingencies, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Other Contingencies—CMS’s property includes areas used as solid waste landfills for many years. Landfilling of general categories of municipal solid waste on the CMS property ceased in 1992, but CMS currently allows certain property to be used for land clearing and inert debris landfilling. Landfilling for construction and demolition debris has ceased on the CMS property. Management believes the Company’s operations, including the landfills on its property, comply with all applicable federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Management is not aware of any situation related to landfill operations which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, future results of operations or cash flows. |
|
TMS, in conjunction with the Fort Worth Sports Authority, has a two-year oil and gas mineral rights lease agreement expiring December 2013 which, among other things, provides the lessee various defined property access and right-of-ways, exclusive exploration and extraction rights, and non-interference by TMS should extraction infrastructure construction and operations commence. TMS is required to coordinate directly with the lessee on roadway and pipeline logistics to prevent interference of TMS or lessee activities, and monitor regulatory and other contract compliance. An upfront cash payment received in December 2011 is being accreted into other operating revenue over the two-year agreement term on a straight-line basis, with $803,000 and $802,000 recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and $2,408,000 and $2,409,000 recognized in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. Deferred revenue recognizable through December 2013 is reflected as current liabilities in deferred race event and other income. |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards—The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” which permits entities first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – General Intangibles Other than Goodwill”. Under this Update, entities have an option not to calculate annually the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset if it determines that it is not more likely than not the asset is impaired. This Update permits entities to assess qualitative factors when testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment results similar to the goodwill impairment testing guidance in Update 2011-08 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment”. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, no further action is required. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, it is required to determine fair value of the intangible asset and perform quantitative impairment testing by comparing fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Subtopic 350-30. Entities also have the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. Entities should consider positive and mitigating events and circumstances that could affect its determination of whether it is more likely than not that the intangible asset is impaired, and should refer to examples in paragraph 350-30-35-18B(a) through (f) for guidance about the types of events and circumstances to consider in evaluating possible impairment. The guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. The Company’s adoption had no impact on its financial statements or disclosures, and the Company now applies this guidance to its impairment assessments. |
|
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” which requires entities to report the effects of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if amounts being reclassified are required under US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to be reclassified in entirety to net income. For other than such amounts, entities are required to cross-reference other disclosures required under US GAAP that provide additional information about those amounts. The guidance is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, and entities are required to comply with this Update for all reporting periods presented, including interim periods. The Company’s adoption had no impact on its financial statements or disclosures as comprehensive income or loss equals net income or loss. |
|
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-11 “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists” whereby an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent those three items are not available at the reporting date under tax law of applicable jurisdictions to settle additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or such tax law does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and not combined with deferred tax assets. The assessment of whether deferred tax assets are available is based on unrecognized tax benefits and deferred tax assets existing at the reporting date, and should be made presuming disallowance of associated tax positions at that date. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2013, applies prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits existing at the effective date, and does not require new recurring disclosures. Early and retrospective adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that adoption may have on its financial statements. |