Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement | ||
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | ||
x Definitive Proxy Statement | ||
o Definitive Additional Materials | ||
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 |
Meadow Valley Corporation
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x | No fee required. |
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
(5) | Total fee paid: |
o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
(3) | Filing Party: |
(4) | Date Filed: |
MEADOW VALLEY CORPORATION
4411 South 40th Street, Suite D-11
Phoenix, Arizona 85040
PROXY STATEMENT AND
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD JUNE 17, 2003
To the shareholders of Meadow Valley Corporation:
The Annual Meeting of the shareholders of Meadow Valley Corporation (the “Company”) will be held at the Company’s executive offices, 4411 South 40th Street, Suite D-11, Phoenix, Arizona, at 11:00 a.m. on June 17, 2003, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the following purposes:
1. | To elect three directors of the Company. | ||
2. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. |
Details relating to the above matters are set forth in the attached Proxy Statement. All shareholders of record of the Company as of the close of business on April 22, 2003, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at such meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof.
ALL SHAREHOLDERS ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE MEETING. IF YOU DO NOT PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU ARE URGED TO SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY. A REPLY CARD IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. THE GIVING OF A PROXY WILL NOT AFFECT YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS | ||
Bradley E. Larson Chief Executive Officer |
May 1, 2003
PROXY STATEMENT
MEADOW VALLEY CORPORATION
4411 South 40th Street, Suite D-11
Phoenix, Arizona 85040
Telephone: (602) 437-5400
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD JUNE 17, 2003
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Meadow Valley Corporation (the “Company”), a Nevada corporation, of $.001 par value Common Stock (“Common Stock”) to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (“Annual Meeting”) to be held at 11:00 a.m. on June 17, 2003, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Company anticipates that this Proxy Statement and the accompanying form of proxy will be first mailed or given to all shareholders of the Company on or about May 1, 2003. The shares represented by all proxies that are properly executed and submitted will be voted at the meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated thereon. Unless otherwise directed, votes will be cast for the election of the nominees for directors hereinafter named. After a quorum is declared, the holders of a majority of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy will be required to approve any proposed matters.
Any shareholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised by delivering written notice of such revocation to the Company, by substituting a new proxy executed at a later date, or by requesting, in person, at the Annual Meeting, that the proxy be returned.
All of the expenses involved in preparing, assembling and mailing this Proxy Statement and the materials enclosed herewith and all costs of soliciting proxies will be paid by the Company. In addition to the solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited by officers and regular employees of the Company by telephone, telegraph or personal interview. Such persons will receive no compensation for their services other than their regular salaries. Arrangements will also be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of the shares held of record by such persons, and the Company may reimburse such persons for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in so doing.
VOTING SHARES AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The close of business on April 22, 2003, has been fixed by the Board of Directors of the Company as the record date (the “record date”) for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, there were outstanding 3,601,250 shares of Common Stock, each share of which entitles the holder thereof to one vote on each matter, which may come before the Annual Meeting. Cumulative voting for directors is not permitted.
A majority of the issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote, represented at the meeting in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum at any shareholders’ meeting.
1
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth information concerning the holdings of Common Stock by each person who, as of April 22, 2003, holds of record or is known by the Company to hold beneficially or of record, more than 5% of the Company’s Common Stock, by each director, named executive officer, and by all directors and executive officers as a group.
All shares are owned beneficially and of record. The address of all persons is in care of the Company at 4411 South 40th Street, Suite D-11, Phoenix, Arizona 85040.
Number of | ||||||||
Shares of | ||||||||
Common | Percent | |||||||
Stock | of | |||||||
Owned of | Common | |||||||
Record and | Stock | |||||||
Beneficially | Owned | |||||||
Name | (1) | (1) | ||||||
Alan Terril (2) | 162,647 | 4.2 | % | |||||
Kenneth D. Nelson (3) | 129,238 | 3.3 | % | |||||
Bradley E. Larson (4) | 129,396 | 3.3 | % | |||||
Charles E. Cowan (5) | 28,500 | .7 | % | |||||
Gary A. Agron (5) | 28,500 | .7 | % | |||||
Earle C. May (6) (7) | 31,000 | .8 | % | |||||
Charles R. Norton (6) | 20,000 | .5 | % | |||||
Kim A. Lewis, Trustee of Richard C. Lewis GST Marital Sub Trust and Kim A. Lewis Survivor’s Trust | 500,000 | 12.9 | % | |||||
Heartland Advisors, Inc. | 211,600 | 5.5 | % | |||||
Cyrus W. Spurlino (8) | 47,800 | 1.2 | % | |||||
Silver State Materials Corp. (8) | 512,300 | 13.2 | % | |||||
Greg J. Paulk | 307,415 | 7.9 | % | |||||
All officers and directors as a group (7 persons) | 529,281 | 13.6 | % |
(1) | Includes stock options exercisable within 60 days from the date hereof. | |
(2) | Includes stock options to purchase 60,533 shares of Common Stock. | |
(3) | Includes stock options to purchase 53,933 shares of Common Stock. | |
(4) | Includes stock options to purchase 72,333 shares of Common Stock. | |
(5) | Includes stock options to purchase 28,500 shares of Common Stock. | |
(6) | Includes stock options to purchase 20,000 shares of Common Stock. |
2
(7) | Includes 11,000 shares of Common Stock. | |
(8) | If these persons are deemed to constitute a group, the 560,100 shares of Common Stock held by these persons would represent approximately 14.4% of the total number of outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Although Silver State Materials Corp. disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock held by Mr. Spurlino, Mr. Spurlino will be deemed to beneficially own the shares of the Company’s Common Stock held by Silver State Materials Corp. since Mr. Spurlino serves as Chairman and Treasurer of Silver State Materials Corp. |
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Company’s By-Laws provide for directors with staggered terms of office, to be divided as equally as possible. Nominees of each class of directors serve for terms of three years (unless a nominee is changing to a different class) and until election and qualification of their successors or until their resignation, death, disqualification or removal from office. Directors not employed by the Company receive $7,500 per year for attending Board of Directors’ meetings and are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses. The Board of Directors held four regularly scheduled meetings during the last full fiscal year and eight telephonic meetings. No director attended less than 75% of the aggregate of such meetings and meetings held by committees of the Board on which he served.
The Board of Directors currently consists of seven members, including three Class A Directors whose terms expire in 2003, two Class B Directors whose terms expire in 2005 and two Class C Directors whose terms expire in 2004. At the Annual Meeting, the three Class A Directors are to be elected to three-year terms expiring in 2006. The nominees for the Class A Directors are Messrs. Cowan, Nelson and Terril, all of who presently serve on the Board of Directors of the Company. A majority of shares voted in person or by proxy is required to elect each nominee for director.
Cumulative voting is not permitted for the election of directors. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, the person named in the accompanying proxy will vote in favor of the election of each of the persons named below as the Company’s nominees for directors of the Company. Each of the nominees has consented to be named herein and to serve if elected. It is not anticipated that any nominee will become unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, but if such should occur, the person named in the proxy intends to vote for the election in his stead of such person as the Board of Directors of the Company may recommend. Members of the Company’s Audit Committee and Compensation Committee are footnoted below.
Name | Positions and Offices with the Company | |
Nominees: | Class A Directors – Term Expires in 2003: | |
Charles E. Cowan (1)(2) | Director | |
Kenneth D. Nelson | Chief Administrative Officer, Vice President and | |
Director | ||
Alan A. Terril | Chief Operating Officer, Vice President and Director | |
Continuing Directors: | Class C Directors – Term Expires in 2004: | |
Bradley E. Larson | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | |
Charles R. Norton (1)(2) | Director |
3
Class B Directors – Term Expires in 2005: | ||
Gary A. Agron (1)(2) | Director | |
Earle C. May (1)(2) | Director |
(1) | Member of the Compensation Committee. The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to determine the compensation to be paid to the Company’s executive officers. | |
(2) | Member of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is composed of only independent directors for which information regarding the functions performed by the Committee, its membership, and the number of meetings held during the fiscal year, is set forth in the “Report of the Audit Committee,” included in this Proxy Statement. A written charter, approved by the Board of Directors, governs the Audit Committee. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter has been attached to this Proxy Statement. |
Report of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report with management including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
The Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Committee under generally accepted auditing standards. In addition, the Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the auditors’ independence from management and the Company including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board and considered the compatibility of nonaudit services with the auditors’ independence.
The Committee discussed with the Company’s independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Committee meets with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2002.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Committee and the Board have also recommended and approved the selection of the Company’s independent auditors.
Gary A. Agron, Audit Committee Chair
Charles E. Cowan, Audit Committee Member
Earle C. May, Audit Committee Member
Charles R. Norton, Audit Committee Member
Dated: March 26, 2003
4
Background
The following is a summary of the business experience of each executive officer and director of the Company for at least the last five years:
Bradley E. Larson, age 48, has been a director of the Company since 1994 and was appointed President in July 1995 and Chief Executive Officer in November 1995. Mr. Larson was employed by Tanner Companies from 1976 until December 1994. He was Division President of the Western Arizona region for Tanner from 1984 to 1988, Vice President of Operations from 1988 to 1989 and President of Tanner’s Construction Division from 1989 until he joined the Company as its Chief Operating Officer in December 1994. Mr. Larson earned a BSE degree in Industrial Engineering from Arizona State University in 1979. He has been active in several construction industry associations and is past Chairman and Director of The Arizona Rock Products Association and past Director of the Arizona Heavy Highway Chapter of the Associated General Contractors.
Kenneth D. Nelson, age 45, has been a director of the Company since 1993 and has been involved in the financial reporting and operations management areas of the construction industry since 1982. He joined the Company in April 1989, became Vice President of Finance in February 1992 and Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer in April 1996. From August 1986 until April 1989, he was operations manager for Builders Unlimited, a construction firm based in Phoenix, Arizona. Mr. Nelson earned a Bachelors of Science Degree in Business Administration from Arizona State University in 1984.
Alan A. Terril, age 62, joined the Company in May 1992, became its Vice President — Nevada Operations in October 1993 and its Chief Operating Officer in March 2001. From February 1979 until April 1992, he was general superintendent, responsible for on site construction management, for Ron Lewis Construction Company, a heavy construction firm.
Gary A. Agron, age 58, has been a director since November 1995. He has been engaged in the private practice of securities law since 1977, with emphasis on representation of issuers and brokers-dealers in public offerings and private placements of equity securities. Mr. Agron earned a Bachelor of Arts degree and a Juris Doctorate degree from the University of Colorado.
Charles E. Cowan, age 56, has been a director since November 1995. Since 1993 he has been President of Charles Cowan & Associates, Ltd. and has an extensive background in government and heavy construction industry consulting. From 1991 to 1993 he held CEO positions in Arizona’s Department of Transportation and Department of Economic Security, and served with the U.S. Corps of Engineers for 25 years. He graduated with a Bachelor of Economics Degree from St. Martin’s College in Olympia, Washington, and a Master’s Degree in Public Administration from the University of Missouri at Kansas City, Missouri.
Earle C. May, age 85, has been a director since March 1999. Since 1969, Mr. May has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of May Management Inc., an investment management firm. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree and Master of Arts degree from the University of Wisconsin and Master of Science degree from the United States Naval Academy.
Charles R. Norton, age 61, has been a director since March 1999. Since 1963, Mr. Norton has been involved in the highway construction industry as construction foreman, subcontractor, general manager and vice president. He graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree from Brigham Young University in 1968. From 1968 to 1972, he was General Manager of Quaker Empire Construction in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. From 1972 to 1992, Mr. Norton was Sales Manager, General Manager and Vice President of Syro Steel Company, headquartered in Girard, Ohio. Since 1992, Mr. Norton has been Vice President of Trinity Industries, which purchased Syro in 1972.
5
Clint Tryon,age 33, joined the Company in May 2002 and was named Secretary, Treasury, and Principal Accounting Officer in September 2002. He received his Bachelor of Science degree with a major in Finance from the University of Nevada Las Vegas in Las Vegas, Nevada. He then completed his post-baccalaureate certificate in accountancy from Arizona State University West in Phoenix, Arizona and has received his Certified Public Accountant’s certificate from the State of Arizona. Mr. Tryon has over nine years of experience in Financial reporting and accounting.
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth certain information concerning compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers whose salaries exceed $100,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000:
Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term Compensation: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and | Annual Compensation | Other Annual | Awards | All Other | |||||||||||||||||||||
Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | Compensation | Options | Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||
Bradley E. Larson | 2002 | $ | 162,750 | $ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
President, Chief | 2001 | 164,105 | 0 | 0 | 20,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Officer and | 2000 | 164,745 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Director | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan A. Terril | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Operating Officer, | 2002 | 127,036 | 16,769 | (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vice President, Manager | 2001 | 124,540 | 9,369 | (1) | 0 | 20,000 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
of Nevada Operations | 2000 | 112,980 | 124,349 | (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
and Director | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kenneth D. Nelson | 2002 | 100,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chief Administrative | 2001 | 101,535 | 0 | 0 | 20,000 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Officer, Vice | 2000 | 102,282 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
President and Director |
(1) | Bonus amounts reflect payments made under the Company’s incentive compensation plan for project and operations management. Management believes that the value of any other benefits to any officer during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, neither exceed $50,000 nor fell within a category requiring inclusion. |
In March 2003, Messrs. Larson, Terril and Nelson signed a three-year employment agreement providing for an annual base salary of $162,750, $127,000 and $100,000, respectively.
Executive Compensation Bonus Plans
Pursuant to plans adopted in 1996, the Company’s executive officers are eligible for cash bonuses based upon the Company’s profitability. See “Executive Compensation” above.
6
Stock Option Plan
In November 1994 the Company adopted a Stock Option Plan (the “1994 Plan”) which provides for the grant of options intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” and “nonstatutory stock options” within the meaning of Section 422A of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). Incentive stock options are issuable only to eligible officers, employee directors, and key employees of the Company. Nonstatutory stock options are issuable only to non-employee directors and consultants of the Company.
The 1994 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised of non-employee directors. At December 31, 1999, the Company had 1,200,000 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the 1994 Plan. Under the 1994 Plan, the Board of Directors determines which individuals shall receive options, the time period during which the options may be partially or fully exercised, the number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased under each option and the option price.
The per share exercise price of the Common Stock may not be less than the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the option is granted. No person who owns, directly or indirectly, at the time of the granting of an incentive stock option, more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company is eligible to receive incentive stock options under the 1994 Plan unless the option price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the Common Stock subject to the option on the date of grant. The option price for Nonstatutory Options shall be established by the Board of Directors and shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock subject to the option on the date of grant.
No options may be transferred by an optionee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and during the lifetime of an optionee, the option may only be exercisable by the optionee. Options may be exercised only if the option holder remains continuously associated with the Company from the date of grant to the date of exercise, unless extended under the Plan grant. Options under the 1994 Plan must be granted within 10 years from the effective date of the 1994 Plan and the exercise date of an option cannot be later than 10 years from the date of grant. Any options that expire unexercised or that terminate upon an optionee’s ceasing to be employed by the Company become available once again for issuance. Shares issued upon exercise of an option will rank equally with other shares then outstanding.
As of April 22, 2003, options had been granted under the 1994 Plan to officers, directors, employees and consultants at an exercise price ranging from $2.4375 per share to $6.25 per share. The exercise prices represented the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock at the date such options were granted. Thirty-three percent of the options indicated in the table below are exercisable after one year of continuous service to the Company, sixty-six percent following two years of continuous service to the Company and one hundred percent after three years of continuous service to the Company.
7
Option Grants in Prior Fiscal Years
The table below sets forth the total number of options issued to each current executive officer and director of the Company through April 22, 2003.
Percent of | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Options | Grant Date | ||||||||||||||||||
Options | Granted in | Exercise | Expiration | Present | ||||||||||||||||
Granted | Fiscal Year | Price | Date | Value (1) | ||||||||||||||||
Bradley E. Larson | 20,000 | 6.43 | % | $ | 6.25 | 11/13/05 | $ | 26,200 | ||||||||||||
25,000 | 10.37 | 4.38 | 12/16/06 | 30,750 | ||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 4.85 | 5.88 | 04/16/08 | 10,080 | ||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 4.23 | 3.88 | 10/21/09 | 7,910 | ||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 9.94 | 2.44 | 03/08/11 | 19,400 | ||||||||||||||||
Kenneth D. Nelson | 14,000 | 4.50 | 6.25 | 11/13/05 | 18,340 | |||||||||||||||
15,000 | 6.22 | 4.38 | 12/16/06 | 18,450 | ||||||||||||||||
5,800 | 4.02 | 5.88 | 04/16/08 | 8,352 | ||||||||||||||||
5,800 | 3.50 | 3.88 | 10/21/09 | 6,554 | ||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 9.94 | 2.44 | 03/08/11 | 19,400 | ||||||||||||||||
Alan A. Terril | 15,600 | 5.02 | 6.25 | 11/13/05 | 20,436 | |||||||||||||||
20,000 | 8.30 | 4.38 | 12/16/06 | 24,600 | ||||||||||||||||
5,800 | 4.02 | 5.88 | 04/16/08 | 8,352 | ||||||||||||||||
5,800 | 3.50 | 3.88 | 10/21/09 | 6,554 | ||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 9.94 | 2.44 | 03/08/11 | 19,400 | ||||||||||||||||
Gary A. Agron | 10,000 | 3.22 | 6.25 | 11/13/05 | 13,100 | |||||||||||||||
7,500 | 3.11 | 4.38 | 12/16/06 | 9,225 | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | .69 | 5.88 | 04/16/08 | 1,440 | ||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 3.02 | 4.00 | 08/13/09 | 5,650 | ||||||||||||||||
7,500 | 3.73 | 2.44 | 03/08/11 | 7,275 | ||||||||||||||||
Charles E. Cowan | 10,000 | 3.22 | 6.25 | 11/13/05 | 13,100 | |||||||||||||||
7,500 | 3.11 | 4.38 | 12/16/06 | 9,225 | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | .69 | 5.88 | 04/16/08 | 1,440 | ||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 3.02 | 4.00 | 08/13/09 | 5,650 | ||||||||||||||||
7,500 | 3.73 | 2.44 | 03/08/11 | 7,275 | ||||||||||||||||
Earle C. May | 10,000 | 6.04 | 4.56 | 03/01/99 | 11,300 | |||||||||||||||
5,000 | 3.02 | 4.00 | 08/13/09 | 5,650 | ||||||||||||||||
7,500 | 3.73 | 2.44 | 03/08/11 | 7,275 | ||||||||||||||||
Charles R. Norton | 10,000 | 6.04 | 4.56 | 03/01/99 | 11,300 | |||||||||||||||
5,000 | 3.02 | 4.00 | 08/13/09 | 5,650 | ||||||||||||||||
7,500 | 3.73 | 2.44 | 03/08/11 | 7,275 |
(1) | The fair value of option grants is estimated as of the date of grant utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for grants: expected life of options of 5 years, expected volatility ranging from 23.94% to 60.85%, risk-free interest rates of 8.0%, and a 0% dividend yield. |
8
Aggregated Options in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
The following table summarizes options exercised during 2002 and presents the value of unexercised options held by the named executives at fiscal year-end:
Number of Securities | Value of Unexercised | |||||||||||||||
Underlying Unexercised | In-the-Money | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Options | Options | ||||||||||||||
Acquired | Value | at Fiscal Year-End | at Fiscal Year-End | |||||||||||||
Name | on Exercise | Realized | Exercisable/Unexercisable | Exercisable/Unexercisable | ||||||||||||
Bradley E. Larson | 0 | $ | 0 | 72,333 / 6,667 | $ | 0 / 0 | ||||||||||
Alan A. Terril | 0 | 0 | 60,533 / 6,667 | 0 / 0 | ||||||||||||
Kenneth D. Nelson | 0 | 0 | 53,933 / 6,667 | 0 / 0 |
The Company has no long-term incentive compensation plans.
Certain Transactions
During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company provided construction materials to LAM Contracting, LLC, a company in which Meadow Valley Corporation has a 49% membership interest and Louis Anthony Mayorga has the remaining 51% membership interest, in the amounts of $12,282 and $40,751, respectively. Included in accounts receivable at December 31, 2002 and 2001 are amounts due from LAM Contracting, LLC of $14,666 and $25,535, respectively. LAM Contracting, LLC provided materials and equipment used in the Company’s business during the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, in the amounts of $675,685 and $774,513, respectively. Included in accounts payable at December 31, 2002 and 2001 are amounts due to LAM Contracting, LLC of $3,609 and $181,598, respectively.
Wiser Construction, LLC, for which Paul R. Lewis, an executive officer and director of the Company up until his death in February 2001, was an executive officer and member, provided materials and equipment used in the Company’s business during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, in the amounts of $1,419,854, $3,116,527 and $255,976, respectively. Included in accounts payable at December 31, 2002 and 2001 are amounts due to Wiser Construction, LLC of $77,645 and $847,673, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company paid mining royalty in the amount of $33,020 to Wiser Construction, LLC.
During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, the Company paid the Lewis Family Trust or Paul R. Lewis mining royalties in the amounts of $514,296, $390,144 and $293,154, respectively. Included in accrued liabilities related to royalties at December 31, 2002 was an amount of $31,276 payable to the Lewis Family Trust and for the year ending December 31, 2001 an amount due to Lewis Family Trust in the amount of $30,464. The Lewis Family Trust provided materials used in the Company’s business during the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 in the amounts of $4,366 and $2,164, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, Gary A. Agron, a director of the Company, rendered legal services to the Company in the amounts of $23,491, $14,573 and $23,342, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, the Company paid $30,000, $30,000 and $30,000, respectively, to outside members of the board of directors to act as board members.
9
The Company leased office space in Moapa, Nevada on a month-to-month basis, at a rental rate of $840 per month, from Moapa Developers, a company owned by Ron R. Lewis, until November 2001. The lease terms also required the Company to pay common area maintenance, taxes, insurance and other costs. Rent expense under the lease for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 amount to $0, $9,240 and $10,080, respectively.
Independent Accountants; Audit and Fees
BDO Seidman, LLP, independent accountants, has served as the independent accountants of the Company since 1994 and has been selected to serve as the Company’s independent accountants for the current year. It is the Company’s understanding that this firm is obligated to maintain audit independence as prescribed by the accounting profession and certain requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. BDO Seidman, LLP fees for our 2002 annual audit and review of interim financial statements were $94,500. No fees were billed for financial information systems design and implementation services. The Audit Committee has concluded that the provision of services by BDO Seidman, LLP is compatible with maintaining its independence. A representative of BDO Seidman, LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will not make a statement but will respond to appropriate questions.
10
Source of Graph by Research Data Group, Inc,
11
Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return
Among Meadow Valley Corporation, the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index
and the Dow Jones US Heavy Construction Index
Measurement Period | Meadow Valley | Nasdaq Stock | Dow Jones US | |||||||||
(Fiscal Year Ending) | Corporation | Market (U.S.) Index | Heavy Construction Index | |||||||||
FYE 12/97 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||||||||
FYE 12/98 | 78.57 | 140.99 | 119.57 | |||||||||
FYE 12/99 | 59.18 | 261.48 | 128.33 | |||||||||
FYE 12/00 | 48.98 | 157.42 | 150.16 | |||||||||
FYE 12/01 | 32.08 | 124.89 | 157.72 | |||||||||
FYE 12/02 | 12.73 | 86.33 | 132.28 |
Source of chart by Research Data Group, Inc.
12
PROPOSALS OF SHAREHOLDERS FOR PRESENTATION
AT THE NEXT ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Any shareholder of record of the Company who desires to submit a proper proposal for inclusion in the proxy materials relating to the next annual meeting of shareholders must do so in writing and it must be received at the Company’s principal executive offices prior to December 31, 2003. The proponent must be a record or beneficial shareholder entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of shareholders on the proposal and must continue to own the securities through the date on which the meeting is held.
OTHER BUSINESS
Management of the Company is not aware of any other matters, which are to be presented at the Annual Meeting, nor has it been advised that other persons will present any other proposals. However, if other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the individual named in the accompanying proxy shall vote on such matters in accordance with his best judgment.
The above notice and Proxy Statement are sent by order of the Board of Directors.
Bradley E. Larson Chief Executive Officer |
May 1, 2003
13
MEADOW VALLEY CORPORATION
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
One committee of the board of directors will be known as the audit committee. The audit committee shall consist of independent board members. An independent director is free of any relationship that could influence his or her judgment as a committee member. An independent director may not be associated with a major vendor to, or customer of, the company. When there is some doubt about independence, as when a member of the committee has a short-term consulting contract with a major customer, the director should recuse himself from any decisions that might be influenced by that relationship.
The primary function of the audit committee is to assist the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the financial information that will be provided to the shareholders and others, the systems of internal controls management and the board of directors have established and all audit processes.
General responsibilities:
Œ | The audit committee provides open avenues of communication among the independent accountant and the board of directors. | |
| The audit committee must report committee’s actions to the full board of directors and may make appropriate recommendations. | |
Ž | The audit committee has the power to conduct or authorize investigations into matters within the committee’s scope of responsibilities. The committee is authorized to retain independent counsel, accountants or others it needs to assist in an investigation. | |
| The committee will meet at least annually each year, more frequently if circumstances make that preferable. The audit committee chairman has the power to call a committee meeting whenever he or she thinks there is a need. An audit committee member should not vote on any matter in which he or she is not independent. The committee may ask members of management or others to attend the meeting and is authorized to receive all pertinent information from management. | |
| The committee will do whatever else the law, the company’s charter or bylaws or the board of directors require. |
Responsibilities for engaging independent accountants:
Œ | The audit committee will approve the selection of the independent accountants for company audits. The committee’s selection is subject to approval by the full board of directors. The audit committee also will review any fees paid to the independent accountants and review and approve dismissal of the independent accountants. | |
| The audit committee will confirm and assure the independence of the independent accountant, including a review of management consulting services provided by the independent accountant and the fees paid for them. | |
Ž | The audit committee will consider, in consultation with the independent accountant, the audit scope and procedural plans made by the independent accountant. | |
| The audit committee will listen to management and the primary independent auditor if either thinks there might be a need to engage additional auditors. The audit committee will decide whether to engage an additional firm and, if so, which one. |
14
MEADOW VALLEY CORPORATION
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER (continued)
Responsibilities for reviewing the annual external audit and the review of quarterly and annual financial statements:
Œ | The audit committee will ascertain that the independent accountant views the board of directors as its client, that it will be available to the full board of directors at least annually and that it will provide the committee with a timely analysis of significant financial reporting issues. | |
| The audit committee will ask management and the independent accountant about significant risks and exposures and will assess management’s steps to minimize them. | |
Ž | The audit committee will review the following with the independent accountant. |
A. | The adequacy of the company’s internal controls, including computerized information system controls and security. | ||
B. | Any significant findings and recommendations made by the independent accountant together with management’s responses to them. |
| Shortly after the annual examination is completed, the audit committee will review the following with management and the independent accountants: |
A. | The company’s annual financial statements and related footnotes. | ||
B. | The independent accountant’s audit of and report on the financial statements. | ||
C. | The auditor’s qualitative judgments about the appropriateness, not just the acceptability, of accounting principles and financial disclosures and how aggressive (or conservative) the accounting principles and underlying estimates are. | ||
D. | Any serious difficulties or disputes with management encountered during the course of an audit. | ||
E. | Anything else about the audit procedures or findings that GAAS requires the auditors to discuss with the committee. |
| The independent accountant will review the interim financial reports and discuss with the audit committee any significant findings related to the review. |
Periodic responsibilities:
Œ | Review and update the committee’s charter as needed. | |
| Review policies and procedures covering officers’ expense accounts and perquisites, including their use of corporate assets, and consider the results of any review of those areas by the independent accountant. | |
Ž | Review legal and regulatory matters that may have a material effect on the organization’s financial statements, compliance policies and programs and reports from regulators. | |
| Meet with the independent accountant and management in separate executive sessions to discuss any matters the committee or these groups believe should be discussed privately with the audit committee. |
15
PROXY
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
MEADOW VALLEY CORPORATION
TO BE HELD JUNE 17, 2003
The undersigned hereby appoints Bradley E. Larson as the lawful agent and Proxy of the undersigned (with all the powers the undersigned would possess if personally present, including full power of substitution), and hereby authorizes him to represent and to vote, as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock of Meadow Valley Corporation held of record by the undersigned on April 22, 2003, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held June 17, 2003, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS:
[ ]FORthe election as a director or all nominees listed below (except as marked to the contrary below).
[ ]WITHHOLD AUTHORITYto vote for all nominees listed below.
NOMINEES:Charles E. Cowan; Kenneth D. Nelson; Alan A. Terril
INSTRUCTIONS:To withhold authority to vote for individual nominees, write their names in the space provided:
2. In his discretion, the Proxy is authorized to vote upon any matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
It is understood that when properly executed, this proxy will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder.WHERE NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED BY THIS SHAREHOLDER THE PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS NAMED IN ITEM 1 ABOVE.
The undersigned hereby revokes all previous proxies relating to the shares covered hereby and confirms all that said Proxy may do by virtue hereof.
Please sign exactly as name appears below. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
Date | Signature | |
Signature, If Held Jointly |
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY BY FOLDING THIS CARD IN HALF, SEAL WITH THE MAILING ADDRESS SHOWING, ATTACH CORRECT POSTAGE AND MAIL.
PLEASE CHECK IF YOU INTEND TO BE PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING: [ ]