| | | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| Part I. Financial Information Item 1. Financial Statements | |
| | |
| Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries | |
| CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 | |
| (Unaudited) | |
| | |
| | | June 30, | | June 30, | |
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | |
| Sales and other operating revenues | | $493,485 | | $403,149 | |
| Cost of goods and services sold | | 415,981 | | 359,171 | |
| | | | | | |
| Gross profit | | 77,504 | | 43,978 | |
| Selling, administrative and general expenses | | 39,247 | | 38,358 | |
| Other income | | 643 | | 155 | |
| Restructuring and asset impairment charges | | 1,698 | | 15,165 | |
| Operating income (loss) | | 37,202 | | (9,390) | |
| | | | | | |
| Debt retirement expense | | - | | 64,907 | |
| Interest expense | | 25,559 | | 24,700 | |
| Interest income | | 15 | | 1,157 | |
| Derivative financial instruments income | | 290 | | 83 | |
| | | | | | |
| Income (loss) before income taxes and other items | | 11,948 | | (97,757) | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | 2,069 | | (19,570) | |
| Equity in net income of investee companies | | 72 | | 19 | |
| Minority interests income | | (174) | | (182) | |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | | 10,125 | | (77,986) | |
| | | | |
| Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | (3,794) | | (2,672) | |
| Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of income taxes | | (252) | | - | |
| Net income (loss) | | $ 6,079 | | $(80,658) | |
| | | | | | |
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $.11 | | $(1.17) | |
| Loss from discontinued operations | | (.04) | | (.04) | |
| Net income (loss) | | $.07 | | $(1.21) | |
| | | | | | |
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $.11 | | $(1.17) | |
| Loss from discontinued operations | | (.04) | | (.04) | |
| Net income (loss) | | $.07 | | $(1.21) | |
| | | | |
| Average number of shares outstanding: | | | | | |
| Basic | | 86,132 | | 66,822 | |
| Diluted | | 87,317 | | 66,822 | |
| | | | | | |
| Cash dividends per share | | $.000 | | $.075 | |
| | | | |
| | |
| See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements | |
| | |
| | |
| -3- | |
| | | | | | |
|
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET |
|
(in thousands) | June 30, 2006 (Unaudited) | | June 30, 2005 (Unaudited) | |
March 31, 2006 | |
| | | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 14,564 | | $ 183,122 | | $ 25,985 | |
Notes receivable | 4,781 | | 4,081 | | 3,609 | |
Trade receivables, net of allowances | 225,609 | | 257,977 | | 320,865 | |
Inventories | | | | | | |
Tobacco | 838,700 | | 977,540 | | 726,846 | |
Other | 42,043 | | 55,221 | | 45,294 | |
Advances on purchases of tobacco | 67,228 | | 92,330 | | 103,147 | |
Current deferred and recoverable income taxes | 39,455 | | 19,797 | | 39,560 | |
Assets held for sale | 25,421 | | - | | 19,955 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 49,206 | | 35,570 | | 36,880 | |
Assets of discontinued operations | 38,983 | | 105,271 | | 46,056 | |
Total current assets | 1,345,990 | | 1,730,909 | | 1,368,197 | |
| | | | | | |
Investments and other assets | | | | | | |
Equity method investees | 17,628 | | 16,725 | | 17,557 | |
Cost method investments | 26,234 | | 2,337 | | 27,206 | |
Notes receivable | 4,740 | | 5,014 | | 4,840 | |
Other | 94,895 | | 83,248 | | 86,764 | |
| 143,497 | | 107,324 | | 136,367 | |
| | |
Goodwill and intangible assets | | | | | | |
Goodwill | 4,186 | | 286,628 | | 4,186 | |
Customer relationship ($31,805 at June 30, 2006; $0 at June 30, 2005; and $32,226 at March 31, 2006) and other | 32,936 | | 3,418 | | 33,756 | |
Pension asset | 1,927 | | 1,856 | | 1,927 | |
| 39,049 | | 291,902 | | 39,869 | |
| | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | | | | |
Land | 25,734 | | 41,277 | | 26,710 | |
Buildings | 184,205 | | 241,215 | | 184,950 | |
Machinery and equipment | 204,898 | | 252,206 | | 211,498 | |
Allowances for depreciation | (138,267) | | (161,632) | | (136,023) | |
| 276,570 | | 373,066 | | 287,135 | |
| | | | | | |
Deferred taxes and other deferred charges | 73,717 | | 101,035 | | 72,556 | |
| | |
| $1,878,823 | | $ 2,604,236 | | $1,904,124 | |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements |
|
|
-4- |
| | | | | |
|
|
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited) |
|
|
(in thousands) | | June 30, 2006 | | June 30, 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Operating activities | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ 6,079 | | $ (80,658) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities | | | | | |
Net loss from discontinued operations | | 3,794 | | 2,672 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 9,096 | | 10,105 | |
Restructuring and asset impairment charges | | 1,698 | | 15,165 | |
Deferred items | | 8,434 | | (326) | |
Gain on foreign currency transactions | | (2,854) | | (3,768) | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | (75,202) | | (57,134) | |
Net cash used by operating activities of continuing operations | | (48,955) | | (113,944) | |
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities of discontinued operations | | 871 | | (2,966) | |
Net cash used by operating activities | | (48,084) | | (116,910) | |
| | | |
Investing activities | | | | | |
Cash received in acquisition of business | | - | | 42,019 | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | (2,333) | | (3,072) | |
Proceeds on sale of property and equipment | | 420 | | 10,722 | |
Payments received on notes receivable | | 220 | | 4,018 | |
Payments for other investments and other assets | | (2,121) | | (3,258) | |
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities of continuing operations | | (3,814) | | 50,429 | |
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities of discontinued operations | | - | | (177) | |
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities | | (3,814) | | 50,252 | |
| | | |
Financing activities | | | | | |
Net change in short-term borrowings | | 40,566 | | (74,030) | |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings | | 19,855 | | 781,878 | |
Repayment of long-term borrowings | | (23,432) | | (455,068) | |
Debt issuance cost | | (425) | | (21,910) | |
Proceeds from sale of stock | | 14 | | 149 | |
Cash dividends paid to Alliance One International, Inc. stockholders | | - | | (7,086) | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | 36,578 | | 223,933 | |
| | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | 3,899 | | (3,281) | |
| | | |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | (11,421) | | 153,994 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | 25,985 | | 29,128 | |
| | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ 14,564 | | $ 183,122 | |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements |
|
|
-6- |
| | |
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands) |
|
1. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION | |
| | |
| Description of Business | |
| The Company is principally engaged in purchasing, processing, storing, and selling leaf tobacco. The Company purchases tobacco primarily in the United States, Africa, Europe, South America and Asia for sale to customers in the United States, Europe, Africa and Asia. | |
| | |
| Basis of Presentation | |
| The Company was renamed Alliance One International, Inc. (Alliance One) concurrent with the merger of Standard Commercial Corporation (Standard) on May 13, 2005 with and into DIMON Incorporated. Because the merger was completed after the close of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the information contained in these consolidated financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2005 includes the operations of Standard since May 13, 2005 and a full three months of results of DIMON. See Note 2 “Merger of Standard and DIMON” to the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information. | |
| The accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. The Company uses the equity method of accounting for its investments in affiliates, which are owned 50% or less. | |
| As of March 31, 2006, the Company deconsolidated its operations in Zimbabwe in accordance with the Accounting Research Bulletin 51,Consolidated Financial Statements (“ARB 51”). ARB 51 provides that when a parent does not have control over a subsidiary due to severe foreign exchange restrictions or governmentally imposed uncertainties, the subsidiary should not be consolidated. After the deconsolidation, a non-cash impairment charge was recorded to reduce the net investment in Zimbabwe operations to estimated fair value. The Company is accounting for the investment on the cost method, as required under the accounting guidance, and has reported it in Cost Method Investments in the June 30, 2006 condensed consolidated balance sheet. Business operations in Zimbabwe were not impacted by the financial reporting change or the non-cash charge, and the Company intends to continue its operations there. The Company is continuing to evaluate strategies for operating under these foreign exchange controls. In addition, the Company is assessing opportunities to remit funds outside of Zimbabwe in order to satisfy external obligations. At June 30, 2006, the investment in the Zimbabwe operations was $23,246. | |
| In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes(FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a more likely than not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on de-recognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, accounting for income taxes in interim periods, and income tax disclosures. This Interpretation is effective for the Company as of April 1, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on its financial statements. | |
| | |
| Equity and Cost Method Investments | |
| The Company’s equity method investments and its cost method investments, which include its Zimbabwe operations, are non-marketable securities. The Company reviews such investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an investment may not be recovered. For example, the Company would test such an investment for impairment if the investee were to lose a significant customer, suffer a large reduction in sales margins, experience a major change in its business environment, or undergo any other significant change in its normal business. In assessing the recoverability of equity or cost method investments, the Company uses discounted cash flow models. If the fair value of an equity investee is determined to be lower than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized. The preparation of discounted future operat ing cash flow analysis requires significant management judgment with respect to future operating earnings growth rates and the selection of an appropriate discount rate. The use of different assumptions could increase or decrease estimated future operating cash flows, and the discounted value of those cash flows, and therefore could increase or decrease any impairment charge. | |
| | |
2. | MERGER OF STANDARD AND DIMON | |
| | |
| On May 13, 2005, the Company completed the merger with Standard pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 7, 2004 (the “Merger Agreement”). Upon the consummation of the merger, Standard was merged into DIMON, which simultaneously changed its name to Alliance One International, Inc. | |
| Under the terms of the merger agreement, Standard shareholders received three shares of the Company’s common stock for each Standard share owned. Approximately 41,243 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in exchange for all outstanding shares of common stock of Standard based on the three-for-one exchange ratio, at an aggregate value of $264,368 (based on the average closing price of $6.36 of DIMON common stock during the two business days before and after the date the merger was announced). The net share value, after consideration of unearned compensation – restricted stock of $2,463, is $261,905. The common stock issuance combined with professional fees and charges incurred to effect the merger of $12,205 resulted in a total purchase price of $274,110. | |
| | |
-7- |
| | |
3. | RESTRUCTURING AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT CHARGES | |
| | |
| The Company expects to realize significant savings as a result of the merger. With the assistance of outside consultants, the Company developed a detailed preliminary integration plan as of the closing of the merger with Standard that addressed each origin and functional area. Through the use of regional integration teams, assessments were made of each of DIMON’s and Standard’s processing facilities around the world as well as identification of countries in which there may be duplicative facilities and/or excess capacity. The plan also reviewed origin and corporate offices. As a result of these closures and redundancies, the plan also included a significant reduction in the global workforce. Subsequent to the acquisition of Standard, the Company has continued assessing relevant information obtained as it relates to markets and customers that were not available prior to the merger which has resulted in modifications to the preliminary integration plan. The integration plan specifically identifies all significant actions to be taken to complete the plan, activities of the acquired company that will not be continued, including the method of disposition and location of those activities, and the plan's expected date of completion. Actions required by the plan were initiated immediately and throughout fiscal 2006 and are continuing in fiscal 2007. | |
| Employee related severance costs in fiscal 2006 totaled $30,944. Severance and other cash charges for fiscal 2006 totaled $43,805. Payments of $31,026 were made in fiscal 2006 with the remaining $13,644 to be paid in fiscal 2007. During the three months ended June 30, 2006, additional restructuring charges of $1,754 were recorded primarily related to additional employee related severance costs which will substantially all be paid in fiscal 2007. Total employee related severance costs and other charges between $15,000 and $17,000 are expected to be incurred in fiscal 2007 due to the ongoing restructuring and integration plans. | |
| In fiscal 2006, the integration charges resulting from the Company’s decisions had different accounting treatment depending on whether they were related to former DIMON operations or former Standard operations. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Conjunction with a Purchase Business Combination, the Company has recorded the costs of a plan to (1) exit an activity of the former Standard operations, (2) involuntarily terminate employees of the former Standard operations, or (3) relocate employees of the former Standard operations as liabilities assumed in a purchase business combination and included in the allocation of the acquisition cost resulting in an increase in goodwill. The Company concluded that these costs were not associated with or were not incurred to generate revenues of the combined entity after the consummation date, had no future economic benefit to the combined Company, were incremental to other costs incurred in the conduct of activities prior to the consummation date, and will be incurred as a direct result of the plan to exit an activity of the Standard. However, all costs of integration actions associated with former DIMON operations are recorded in earnings as restructuring and asset impairment costs. | |
| In fiscal 2007, all costs of integration actions associated with former DIMON and former Standard operations are recorded in earnings as restructuring and asset impairment costs only when they are incurred or meet the criteria for recording in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” or SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”. | |
| | |
| | |
| -9- | |
| | | | | |
7. | EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE | |
| Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding is reported as the weighted average of the total shares of common stock outstanding net of shares of common stock owned by a subsidiary. Shares of common stock owned by the subsidiary was 7,853 at June 30, 2006. This subsidiary does not receive dividends on these shares and it does not have the right to vote. | |
| In connection with the closing of the merger with Standard many of the Company’s financing arrangements were refinanced, including in July of 2005, the Company’s $73,328 of convertible subordinated debentures due 2007. The diluted earnings per share calculation assumes that all of the 6 1/4 % Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2007 outstanding during the periods presented were converted into shares of common stock at the beginning of the reporting period thereby increasing the weighted average number of shares considered outstanding during each period and reducing the after-tax interest expense. The weighted average number of shares outstanding are further increased by shares of common stock equivalents for employee stock options and restricted shares outstanding. | |
| For the three months ended June 30, 2006, the weighted average number of shares outstanding was increased by a total of 1,185 shares of common stock equivalents for employee stock options and restricted shares outstanding for the computation of diluted earnings per share. Certain potentially dilutive options were not included in the computation of earnings per dilutive share because their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the shares of common stock during the period and their effect would be antidilutive. These shares totaled 2,795 at a weighted average exercise price of $8.98 per share. | |
| For the three months ended June 30, 2005, the computation of diluted earnings per share did not assume the conversion of the convertible subordinated debentures at the beginning of the period because the inclusion would have been antidilutive. For the three months ended June 30, 2005, all outstanding restricted stock and stock options were excluded because the effect of their inclusion would have been antidilutive. | |
| | |
8. | COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | |
| The components of comprehensive income (loss) were as follows: | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2006 | | 2005 |
| Net income (loss) | $ 6,079 | | $(80,658) |
| Equity currency conversion adjustment | 4,963 | | (5,402) |
| Derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $13 in 2005 | - | | 24 |
| Total comprehensive income (loss) | $11,042 | | $(86,036) |
| -16- | |
| | |
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
| | |
9. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION | |
| | |
| On April 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” This statement requires the Company to expense the fair value of grants of various stock-based compensation programs at fair value over the vesting period of the awards. The Company elected to adopt this statement using the “Modified Prospective Application” (MPA) transition method which does not result in the restatement of previously issued financial statements. Application of the MPA transition method requires compensation costs to be recognized beginning on the effective date for the estimated fair value at date of grant in accordance with the original provision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” for all stock-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of April 1, 2006. Awards granted after Apri l 1, 2006 will be recognized as compensation expense based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). The MPA transition method also requires that any unearned or deferred compensation recorded in “contra-equity” accounts be eliminated against the equity accounts that will be affected by the on-going recognition of stock based compensation. Accordingly, the Company has reclassified $2,371 from Unearned Compensation – Restricted Stock to Common Stock. | |
| Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), all benefits of tax deductions resulting from the exercise of share-based compensation were presented as operating cash flows in the Company’s Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS 123(R) requires that benefits of tax deductions in excess of deductions for compensation cost recognized (excess tax benefits) be classified as financing cash flows. | |
| For the three months ended June 30, 2006, compensation expense for stock-based compensation plans was $890. The corresponding income tax benefit recognized for stock-based compensation plans was $217. | |
| The Company currently has three types of stock based compensation awards; Stock Options, Stock Options with Stock Appreciation Rights, and Restricted Stock. These various types of grants are made in accordance with the Alliance One International, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (the Plan) which was approved by shareholders of the Company in November 2003. This plan authorizes the issuance of the various stock based compensation awards to any employee of the Company or any subsidiary and any member of the Board that the Executive Compensation Committee determines has contributed to the profits or growth of the Company or its affiliates. There are 6,000 share based compensation awards authorized under the Plan of which 4,188 are outstanding and 1,812 are available for future awards. Shares issued under the Plan are new shares which have been authorized and designated for award under the Plan. The individual awards are discussed in greater detail below. | |
| | |
| Stock Option Awards | |
| Stock options allow for the purchase of common stock at a price determined at the time the option is granted. This price has historically been the stock price on the date of grant. Stock options generally vest at the end of three years and generally expire after ten years. The fair value of these options is determined at grant date using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The fair value is then recognized as compensation expense ratably over the vesting term of the options. There were no grants of stock options during the three months ended June 30, 2006 or June 30, 2005. | |
| A summary of option activity for stock options follows: | |
| | |
10. | CONTINGENCIES | |
| | |
| Tax | |
| During June 2004, the Company received from Brazilian tax officials notices of proposed adjustments to income tax returns for the Company’s Brazil operations for tax years 1999 through 2002, inclusive, that total $54,360 as of March 31, 2005. Of these proposed adjustments $39,446 related to disallowance of local currency foreign exchange losses on U.S. dollar funding. In March 2005, the Taxpayer’s Council dismissed the assessment relating to the disallowance of local currency foreign exchange losses. The remaining $14,914 related to disallowance of other sales related expenses. As of June 30, 2006, this amount is valued at $19,391 due to the devaluation of the U.S. dollar to the Brazilian real. The Company is continuing to argue its position on the disallowance of sales related expenses, and believes it has strong defenses to these ad justments. | |
| In 1993 and 1996, the Company received notices from Brazilian tax authorities of proposed adjustments to the income tax returns of the Company’s entities located in Brazil for the calendar years ending 1988 through 1992. The Company has successfully defeated many of the proposed adjustments in litigation and settled the other issues under REFIS and Tax Amnesty programs. As of June 30, 2006, total estimated tax, penalties and interest relating to still unresolved issues is $2,195. | |
| On August 21, 2001, the Company’s subsidiary in Brazil won a claim related to certain excise taxes (“IPI credit bonus”) for the years 1983 through 1990 and is now pursuing collection. The collection procedures are not clear and the total realization process could potentially extend over many years. Through March 2005, the Company has utilized $20,377 of IPI credit bonus in lieu of cash payments for Brazilian federal income and other taxes. No benefit for this IPI credit bonus has been recognized, and it has been recorded as deferred revenue, because the Company has been unable to predict whether the Brazilian Government will require payment of amounts offset. In January 2005, the Company received a Judicial Order to suspend the IPI compensation. An appeal was filed and t he Company received notification from the tax authorities in March 2005 to present all documentation pertaining to the IPI credit bonus. On April 24, 2006, the Company received an assessment of $26,600 for federal income taxes in 2005 that were offset by the IPI credit bonus. The Company has appealed the assessment and believes it has properly utilized the IPI credit bonus. | |
| On October 31, 2002, the Company received an assessment from the tax authorities in Germany regarding the taxable gain from the sale of its flower operations, Florimex, in September 1998. The report concluded the values of the real estate located in Germany were greater than those arrived at with the buyer of the flower operation. The proposed adjustment to income tax, including interest, as of June 30, 2006 is equivalent to approximately $5,101 for federal corporate income tax and $2,882 for local trade income tax. The Company has challenged this finding with valuations that support the values used in the original filings and is currently discussing the issue with the tax officials in Germany. During March 2005, the Company received an official rejection of its appeal from the tax administr ation officials in Germany. The Company has now appealed to the tax court and believes it has a strong case. During the quarter ended December 31, 2005, the Company was informed that its hearing will not take place before August 2006. This case is still ongoing as of June 30, 2006. | |
| -19- | |
| | |
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
10. | CONTINGENCIES (Continued) | |
| | |
| In September 2002 and in January 2004, the Company’s Tanzanian operations received assessments for income taxes equivalent to approximately $1,515 and $4,785, respectively as of June 30, 2006. In September 2005, additional assessments for 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were received. The assessments for 2001, 2002 and 2003 reduce tax loss carryovers equivalent to $8,525 as of June 30, 2006. The 2004 assessment reduces tax loss carryovers equivalent to $1,667 as of June 30, 2006. The Company has filed protests and appeals and is currently awaiting replies. | |
| The Company has other tax audits and reviews ongoing in Indonesia, Luxembourg, the United Kingdom and Italy. None of these is material and the Company believes it has supportable positions to all possible tax issues. | |
| The Company believes it has properly reported its income and provided for taxes in Brazil, Germany and Tanzania in accordance with applicable laws and intends to vigorously contest the proposed adjustments. | |
| Although the final resolution of the proposed adjustments is uncertain and involves unsettled areas of the law, based on currently available information, the Company has provided for the probable liability associated with these matters. While the resolution of these issues may result in tax liabilities that may differ from the accruals of $10,804 established for the matters, the Company currently believes that the resolution will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or liquidity. However, an unfavorable resolution could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or cash flows in the quarter and year in which an adjustment is recorded or the tax is due or paid. As the Company is no farther than the initial stages of the appeals process for any of the above matters, the timing of the ultimate resolution and any payments that may be required for the above matters cannot be determined at this time. | |
| | |
| Other | |
| Since October 2001, the Directorate General for Competition (DGCOMP) of the European Commission (EC) has been conducting an administrative investigation into certain tobacco buying and selling practices alleged to have occurred within the leaf tobacco industry in some countries within the European Union, including Spain, Italy, Greece and potentially other countries. The Company and its subsidiaries in Spain, Italy and Greece have been subject to these investigations. In respect of the investigation into practices in Spain, in 2004, the EC fined DIMON and its Spanish subsidiaries €2,592 and Standard and its Spanish subsidiaries €1,823. In respect of the investigation into practices in Italy, in October 2005, the EC announced that the Company and Mindo (its former subsidiary) have been assessed a fine in the aggregate amount of €10,000 and that, in addition, the Company and Transcatab, a subsidiary of Standard prior to its merger into DIMON, have been assessed a fine in the aggregate amount of €14,000. With respect to both the Spanish and Italian investigations, the fines imposed on the Company and its predecessors and subsidiaries were part of fines assessed on several participants in the applicable industry. With respect to the investigation relating to Greece, the EC informed DIMON and Standard in March 2005 it had closed its investigation in relation to the Greek leaf tobacco industry buying and selling practices. The Company, along with its applicable subsidiaries, has appealed the decisions of the Commission with respect to Spain and Italy to the Court of First Instance of the European Commission for the annulment or modification of the decision; but the outcome of the appeals process as to both timing and results is uncertain. The Company has fully recognized the impact of each of the fines set forth above, and actual ly paid all of such fines as part of the appeal process. | |
| The Company received correspondence from a former employee alleging that the Company has engaged in employment practices with respect to some employees located in certain foreign jurisdictions in violation of such jurisdictions’ laws and which could subject the Company to fines and penalties. The Company has reported these allegations to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and is currently engaged in an extensive review in order to determine and take any appropriate remedial measures. | |
| The Company has recently received correspondence from an Italian company, Mindo S.r.l., which was the purchaser, in June, 2004, of the Company’s Italian subsidiary, DIMON Italia S.r.l., alleging that the Company and various of its subsidiaries, employees and other individuals not employed by the Company, failed to disclose, at the time of Mindo’s purchase, certain events or circumstances which, if disclosed, would have caused Mindo not to purchase the Company’s subsidiary and which amount to a breach of the purchase agreement. Although no formal legal proceeding has yet been filed, Mindo is apparently contending that it is entitled to the rescission of the purchase agreement. The Company has investigated the claims, believes them to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend any legal proceeding which might be brought. | |
| The Company and certain of its foreign subsidiaries guarantee bank loans to growers to finance their crop. Under longer-term arrangements, the Company may also guarantee financing on growers’ construction of curing barns or other tobacco production assets. The Company also guarantees bank loans to certain tobacco cooperatives to assist with the financing of their growers’ crops. Guaranteed loans are generally repaid concurrent with the delivery of tobacco to the Company. The Company is obligated to repay any guaranteed loan should the grower or tobacco cooperative default. If default occurs, the Company has recourse against the grower or cooperative. At June 30, 2006, the Company was guarantor of an amount not to exceed $332,462 with $238,409 outstanding under the se guarantees. The majority of the current outstanding guarantees expire within the respective annual crop cycle. The Company considers the risk of significant loss under these guarantees and other contingencies to be remote and the accrual recorded for exposure under them was not material at June 30, 2006. | |
| -20- | |
| | |
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
10. | CONTINGENCIES (Continued) | |
| | |
| Zimbabwe remains in a period of civil unrest and has a deteriorating economy. Should the current political situation continue, the Company could experience disruptions and delays associated with its Zimbabwe operations. If the political and economic situation in Zimbabwe continues to deteriorate, there could be further impairment of the cost method investment. At March 31, 2006, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $47,899. As a result, the Zimbabwe cost method subsidiaries are recorded at an estimated fair value of approximately $23,246 at June 30, 2006. | |
| | |
11. | REFINANCING OF DEBT ARRANGMENTS | |
| | |
| On May 13, 2005, many of the Company’s existing financing arrangements were refinanced in connection with the closing of the merger with Standard because of change of control clauses in agreements governing such financings, or because the merged company would not have been able to comply with certain of the financial covenants contained in those agreements as of the closing of, or immediately after, the merger. The specific financing arrangements that were refinanced were: | |
| · DIMON’s $150,000 senior credit facility; | |
| · DIMON’s $200,000 of 9 5/8% senior notes due 2011; | |
| · DIMON’s $125,000 of 7 3/4% senior notes due 2013; | |
| · DIMON’s $73,328 of convertible subordinated debentures due 2007 (July 2005); | |
| · Standard’s $150,000 senior credit facility; and | |
| · Standard’s $150,000 of 8% senior notes due 2012. | |
| | |
| The Company raised capital to tender for, repay or redeem these financings and pay the costs and expenses of the refinancing through the following financing arrangements, as amended, all of which were effective with the closing of the merger on May 13, 2005 and are described in more detail below: | |
| · the issuance of $315,000 of 11% senior notes due 2012; | |
| · the issuance of $100,000 of 12 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2012 sold at a 10% original issue discount (reflecting a 15% yield to maturity); and | |
| · a new $650,000 senior secured credit facility with a syndicate of banks consisting of (1) a three-year $300,000 senior secured revolving credit line, which accrues interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 3.25%, (2) a three-year $150,000 senior secured term loan, which accrues interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.25%, and (3) a five-year $200,000 senior secured term loan, which accrues interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.50%. | |
| The Company and Intabex Netherlands, B.V., or Intabex (one of the Company’s primary wholly-owned foreign holding companies), are co-borrowers under the new $300,000 senior secured revolving credit line, and the Company’s borrowings under that line are limited to $150,000 principal amount outstanding at any one time. Intabex is the sole borrower under each of the new senior secured term loans. One of the Company’s primary foreign trading companies, Alliance One International AG, or AOIAG, is a guarantor of Intabex’s obligations under the new senior secured credit facility. | |
| Our new senior credit facility is secured by a pledge of certain of its assets as collateral for borrowings thereunder. Borrowings of the Company under the new senior secured credit facility are secured by a first priority pledge of: | |
| · 100% of the capital stock of any material domestic subsidiaries; | |
| · 65% of the capital stock of any material first tier foreign subsidiaries of the Company or of its domestic subsidiaries; | |
| · intercompany notes evidencing loans or advances made by the Company on or following the closing date to subsidiaries that are not guarantors; and | |
| · U.S. accounts receivable and U.S. inventory owned by the Company and its material domestic subsidiaries (other than inventory the title of which has passed to a customer and inventory financed through customer advances). | |
| In addition, Intabex’s borrowings under the new senior secured credit facility are guaranteed by the Company, all of its present or future material direct or indirect domestic subsidiaries and AOIAG. | |
| The new senior secured credit facility includes certain financial covenants and requires the Company to maintain certain financial ratios, including a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio; a maximum consolidated leverage ratio; a maximum consolidated total senior debt to borrowing base ratio; and a maximum amount of annual capital expenditures. | |
| | |
| | |
| -21- | |
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
11. | REFINANCING OF DEBT ARRANGMENTS (Continued) | |
| | |
| The new senior notes indentures contain certain covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness; issue preferred stock; merge, consolidate or dispose of substantially all of its assets; grant liens on its assets; pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions or restricted payments; repurchase or redeem capital stock or prepay subordinated debt; make certain investments; agree to restrictions on the payment of dividends to the Company by its subsidiaries; sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including equity interests of its subsidiaries; enter into transactions with its affiliates; and enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions. | |
| From time to time the Company may need to enter into various amendments and or waivers under its Senior Secured Credit Agreement seeking specific modification to covenants or provisions therein related to changes in the normal course of business, special one time occurrences, financial performance or other unforeseeable events. On October 28, 2005 the Company and the Lenders agreed to the First Amendment to the May 13, 2005 Senior Secured Credit Agreement where a provision was established permitting the payment of fines up to €24,000 related to European Commission anti-competition litigation. The changes effected by the Second Amendment are described in detail in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on December 1, 2005. | |
| Additionally, effective November 30, 2005 the Company and the Lenders agreed to the Second Amendment to the May 13, 2005 Senior Secured Credit Agreement, where several sections were modified. The Second Amendment relaxes certain financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement, including but not limited to: | |
| · a reduction of the minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio that must be maintained; | |
| · an increase in the maximum consolidated leverage ratio that must be maintained; and | |
| · the establishment of a fixed maximum consolidated total senior debt to borrowing base ratio that must be maintained. | |
| | |
| The Second Amendment also changes certain negative covenants in the Credit Agreement, including but not limited to: | |
| · a reduction in the maximum permitted amount of uncommitted inventory; | |
| · a decrease in the maximum capital expenditures to $40 million per year; and | |
| · a prohibition of certain restricted payments, including dividends to holders of Alliance One common stock, from the date of the Second Amendment until the first fiscal quarter during which the borrowers have fully complied with the original financial covenants set forth in the Credit Agreement (the “Pricing Period”). | |
| The Second Amendment also provides that no borrowings may be drawn under the revolving credit facility or swingline facility if Alliance One has more than $110 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents in the aggregate on its consolidated balance sheet at the time of such draw. Further, if unrestricted cash and cash equivalents exceed $110 million for any ten consecutive days, unrestricted cash and cash equivalents in excess of $110 million must be used to repay borrowings under the swingline or revolving credit facility. | |
| The Second Amendment provides that during the Pricing Period, the interest rate margin applicable to the revolving credit facility and term loan A borrowings shall be 3.25% over LIBOR or 2.25% over the Agent’s base rate. In addition, the Second Amendment permanently increases the interest rate on the term loan B to 3.50% over LIBOR or 2.50% over the Agent’s base rate. | |
| The Company continuously monitors its compliance with these covenants. No default exists as of June 30, 2006. | |
| | |
12. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | |
| | |
| Floating to Fixed Rate Interest Swaps | |
| Prior to the implementation of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” the Company entered into multiple interest rate swaps to convert a portion of its worldwide debt portfolio from floating to fixed interest rates to reduce its exposure to interest rate volatility. At June 30, 2006, all instruments of this type had been terminated. SFAS No. 133 eliminated hedge accounting treatment for these instruments because they do not meet certain criteria. Accordingly, the Company is required to reflect the full amount of all changes in their fair value, without offset, in its current earnings. These fair value adjustments have caused substantial volatility in the Company’s reported earnings. For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company recognized non-cash income before income taxes of $290 and $83, respectively from the change in fair value of these derivative financial instruments. With the recognition of each income or expense relating to these instruments, a corresponding amount is recognized in Other Long-Term Liabilities - Compensation and Other. | |
| | |
| Forward Currency Contracts | |
| The Company periodically enters into forward currency contracts to protect against volatility associated with certain non-U.S. dollar denominated forecasted transactions. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, when these derivatives qualify for hedge accounting treatment, they are accounted for as cash flow hedges and are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes. | |
| -22- | |
| | |
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
12. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued) | |
| | |
| The Company has entered into forward currency contracts to hedge cash outflows in foreign currencies around the world for green tobacco purchases and processing costs. Some of these contracts do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133, and as such, are reported in income. For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, income of $1,672 and $0, respectively, has been recorded in cost of goods and services sold. | |
| | |
| Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments | |
| In accordance with SFAS No. 133, the Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swap contracts and foreign exchange contracts, at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the instrument. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized periodically in income or in stockholders’ equity as a component of comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative financial instrument qualifies for hedge accounting, and if so, whether it qualifies as a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge. Changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are recorded in income along with the portions of the changes in the fair values of the hedged items that relate to the hedged risk(s). Changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, to t he extent they are effective as hedges, are recorded in other comprehensive income net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair values of derivatives not qualifying as hedges are reported in income. | |
| The fair value estimates presented herein are based on quoted market prices. There were no fair value hedges during the three months ended June 30, 2006. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, accumulated other comprehensive income decreased by $24, net of deferred taxes of $13 due to the reclassification into earnings, primarily as cost of goods and services sold, as transactions were fulfilled. | |
| | |
13. | PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS | |
| The Company has a defined benefit plan that provides retirement benefits for substantially all U.S. salaried personnel based on years of service rendered, age and compensation. The Company also maintains various other Excess Benefit and Supplemental Plans that provide additional benefits to (1) certain individuals whose compensation and the resulting benefits that would have actually been paid are limited by regulations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and (2) certain individuals in key positions. The Company funds these plans in amounts consistent with the funding requirements of Federal Law and Regulations. | |
| Additional non-U.S. defined benefit plans sponsored by certain subsidiaries cover certain full-time employees located in Germany, Greece, Turkey and United Kingdom. | |
| | |
| Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost | |
| Net periodic pension cost for continuing operations consisted of the following: | |
|
The purchasing and processing activities of our business are seasonal. Our need for capital fluctuates and, at any one of several seasonal peaks, our outstanding indebtedness may be significantly greater or less than at year-end. We historically have needed capital in excess of cash flow from operations to finance inventory and accounts receivable. We also pre-finance tobacco crops in numerous foreign countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Guatemala, Malawi, Mexico, Tanzania, Turkey and Zambia. |
Our working capital increased from $538.9 million at March 31, 2006 to $556.5 million at June 30, 2006. Our current ratio was 1.7 to 1 at June 30, 2006 compared to 1.6 to 1 at March 31, 2006. The increase in working capital is primarily related to an increase in inventories and advances on purchases of tobacco partially offset by decreases in accounts receivable and accounts payable. |
Net cash used by operating activities was $48.1 million in 2006 compared to $116.9 million in 2005. The decrease in cash used was primarily due to $6.1 million net income in 2006 compared to a net loss of $80.7 million in 2005. Cash used was further decreased by an $8.8 million change in deferred items and a $3.8 million change in discontinued operations. The decrease in cash used was partially offset by a $13.5 million change in restructuring and asset impairment charges and a $18.1 million increase in cash used by operating assets and liabilities primarily due to increases in inventories and advances on purchases of tobacco. |
Net cash used by investing activities was $3.8 million in 2006 compared to cash provided of $50.3 million in 2005. The decrease in cash provided by investing activities is primarily due to $42.0 million provided in the prior year by the purchase and merger of Standard Commercial Corporation into Alliance One, $10.3 million less cash provided from sales of property and equipment, $3.8 million less cash provided by notes receivable partially offset by $1.1 million less cash used for payments for other assets. |
Net cash provided by financing activities was $36.6 million in 2006 compared to $223.9 million in 2005. Decreases of $330.3 million were due to net decreases in long term borrowings resulting from new arrangements in the prior year, partially offset by the repayment of former long term debt in the prior year. The decrease from long term borrowings was partially offset by $114.6 million more cash provided by short term borrowings in 2006, $21.5 million less cash used for debt issuance costs in 2006 compared to 2005 and an the discontinuance of dividends to shareholders of $7.1 million. |
At June 30, 2006, we had seasonally adjusted available lines of credit of $515.5 million of which $337.8 was outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of 6.0%. Unused short-term lines of credit amounted to $128.6 million. At June 30, 2006 we had $23.5 million letters of credit outstanding and an additional $25.4 million of letters of credit lines available. Total maximum borrowings, excluding the long-term credit agreements, during the quarter were $420.3 million. |
-25- |
|
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES:(Continued) |
|
No cash dividends were paid to stockholders during the quarter. |
On May 13, 2005 we completed a new $650 million senior secured credit facility, as amended, with a syndicate of banks consisting of (1) a three-year $300 million senior secured revolving credit line, which accrues interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 3.25%, (2) a three-year $150 million senior secured term loan, which accrues interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.25%, and (3) a five-year $200 million senior secured term loan, which accrues interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.50%. One of our primary foreign holding companies, Intabex Netherlands, B.V. (Intabex), is co-borrower under the new senior secured revolving credit line, and our portion of the borrowings under that line are limited to $150.0 million principal amount outstanding at any one time. Intabex is the sole borrower under each of the new senior secured term loans. One o f our primary foreign trading companies, Alliance One International AG (AOIAG), is a guarantor of Intabex’s obligations under the new senior secured credit facility. |
From time to time we may need to enter into various amendments and or waivers under our Senior Secured Credit Agreement seeking specific modification to covenants or provisions therein related to changes in the normal course of business, special one time occurrences, financial performance or other unforeseeable events. On October 28, 2005 we agreed to the First Amendment with the Lenders to the May 13, 2005 Senior Secured Credit Agreement, where a provision was established permitting the payment of fines up to €24 million related to European Commission anti-competition litigation. Additionally, effective November 30, 2005 the Lenders and ourselves, agreed to the Second Amendment to the May 13, 2005 Senior Secured Credit Agreement, where several sections were modified. The changes effected by the Second Amendment are described in the Current Report on Form 8-K file d by us on December 1, 2005. |
The new senior credit facility is secured by a pledge of certain of our assets as collateral for borrowings thereunder. Our borrowings under the new senior secured credit facility are secured by a first priority pledge of: |
|
· 100% of the capital stock of any material domestic subsidiaries; |
· 65% of the capital stock of any material first tier foreign subsidiaries, or of its domestic subsidiaries; |
· intercompany notes evidencing loans or advances we make on or following the closing date to subsidiaries that are not guarantors; and |
· U.S. accounts receivable and U.S. inventory owned by us or our material domestic subsidiaries (other than inventory the title of which has passed to a customer and inventory financed through customer advances). |
|
In addition, Intabex’s borrowings under the new senior secured credit facility are secured by a pledge of 100% of the capital stock of Intabex, AOIAG, and certain of our and Intabex’s material foreign subsidiaries. They are also guaranteed by us, all of our present or future material direct or indirect domestic subsidiaries, and AOIAG. |
The new senior secured credit facility includes certain financial covenants and requires us to maintain certain financial ratios, including a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio; a maximum consolidated leverage ratio; a maximum consolidated total senior debt to borrowing base ratio; and a maximum amount of annual capital expenditures. |
We continuously monitor our compliance with these covenants and we are not in default as of, or for the quarter ended, June 30, 2006. If we were in default or were going to be in default and were unable to obtain the necessary amendments or waivers under our senior secured credit facility, we could be in default with respect to our financial covenants in future quarters, which would give the lenders under that facility the right to terminate that facility and demand repayment of borrowings thereunder. A demand for repayment under the senior secured credit facility would result in a cross default under the indentures governing our senior notes and senior subordinated notes and could impair access to our seasonal operating lines of credit in local jurisdictions. A default under our senior secured credit facility would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and fi nancial condition. |
Also on May 13, 2005 we issued $315 million of 11% senior notes due 2012, and $100 million of 12 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2012, with the latter sold at a 10% original issue discount (reflecting a 15% yield to maturity). The new senior notes indentures contain certain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness; issue preferred stock; merge, consolidate or dispose of substantially all of our assets; grant liens on our assets; pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions or restricted payments; repurchase or redeem capital stock or prepay subordinated debt; make certain investments; agree to restrictions on the payment of dividends to us by our subsidiaries; sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including equity interests of its subsidiaries; enter into transactions with our affiliates; and enter into certain sale a nd leaseback transactions. |
Repayments of debt as of June 30, 2006 are scheduled as follows: $143.8 million in fiscal 2007 and 2008, $194.0 million in fiscal years 2009 and 2010, and $405.9 million in fiscal years 2011 and thereafter. |
We have historically financed our operations through a combination of short-term lines of credit, revolving credit arrangements, long-term debt securities, customer advances and cash from operations. At June 30, 2006, we had no material capital expenditure commitments. We believe that these sources of funds will be sufficient to fund our anticipated needs for fiscal year 2007. There can be no assurance, however, that these sources of capital will be available in the future or, if available, that any such sources will be available on favorable terms. |
|
|
-26- |
|
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued) |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
Sales and other operating revenuesincreased 22.4% from $403.1 million in 2005 to $493.5 million in 2006 which includes a full three months of the merged company. The $90.4 million increase is the result of a 15.9% or 20.0 million kilo increase in quantities sold and a 5.0% or $0.16 per kilo increase in average sales prices. Revenues from the South America operating segment increased $37.5 million or 18.6% resulting from an increase of $0.29 per kilo in average sales prices combined with an increase in volumes of 5.6 million kilos. Increased customer sales prices related to the increased costs of the 2006 crop are the primary reason for the South America operating segment price increases. Revenues from the Other Regions operating segment increased $49.6 million or 24.8% primarily as a result of an opportunistic sale of U.S. inventories. Volumes in the Other Regions operating segment increased 14.3 million kilos and average sales prices increased $0.07 per kilo as well. Processing and other service revenues in the Other Regions operating segment increased $3.3 million primarily related to greater quantities of U.S. customer-owned tobacco processed. |
|
Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased from 10.9% in 2005 to 15.7% in 2006. Gross profit also increased $33.5 million or 76.1% from $44.0 million in 2005 to $77.5 million in 2006. The increases in gross profit as well as the gross profit percentage are primarily attributable to two factors. In the South America operating segment, as disclosed throughout the prior year, gross profit in Brazil had been negatively impacted due to increased costs from the absorption of local intrastate trade taxes resulting from a change in local laws. During the current quarter, we entered into an agreement with the government of Rio Grande do Sul, the state in which our processing facilities in Brazil are located. Per the agreement we will be able to transfer accumulated intrastate trade tax credits related to the 2005 crop instead of having to absorb those costs. As a result, intrastate trade taxes related to the 2005 crop of $19.2 million previously recorded as expense in fiscal 2006 have been reversed during the quarter. Partially offsetting the increased gross profit in the South America operating segment is the impact of the quality of the 2006 crop and decreased demand. The 2006 Brazilian crop was expected to be an average quality crop. However, the quality declined significantly due to weather related growing conditions in the latter part of the season. In addition, demand is projected to decline as well. As a result, the 2006 crop provision for grower bad debt has increased. This increase has negatively impacted the current quarter gross profit and will continue to negatively impact gross profit in future quarters relative to 2006 crop sales. Second, the reduction of gross profit on sales of inventory acquired in the merger as a result of purchase accounting inventory adjustments decreased by $8.3 million, primarily in the South America operating segment. The elimination of these prior year purchase accounting inventory adjustments from the current year will continue to improve gross profit as well as gross profit percentages in future quarters. |
|
Selling, administrative and general expensesincreased $0.8 million or 2.1% from $38.4 million in 2005 to $39.2 million in 2006. The increase is primarily due to increased costs as a result of 2006 including a full three months of the merged company including increased legal and professional costs. Expenses were further increased by the impact of expenses denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Brazilian real. If 2005 had included the full three months of the merged company, the selling, administrative and general expenses in 2006 would have decreased $10.1 million or 20.5%. |
|
Other Incomeof $0.6 million in 2006 and $0.2 million in 2005 relate primarily to fixed asset sales. |
|
Restructuring, asset impairment and integration chargeswere $1.7 million in 2006 compared to $15.2 million in 2005. The 2006 costs relate to employee severance and other integration related charges as a result of the merger. The 2005 costs include $4.5 million related to asset impairment charges and $10.7 million related to employee severance and other integration related charges as a result of the merger. See Note 3 “Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges” to the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information. |
|
Debt retirement expense of $64.9 million in 2005 relates to one time costs of retiring DIMON debt as a result of the merger. These costs include tender premiums paid for the redemption of senior notes, the reversal of debt issuance costs associated with former DIMON debt instruments, termination of certain interest rate swap agreements and other related costs. |
|
Interest expense increased $0.9 million from $24.7 million in 2005 to $25.6 million in 2006 due to higher average rates partially offset by lower average borrowings. |
|
Derivative financial instrumentsresulted in a benefit of $0.3 million in 2006 and $0.1 million in 2005. These items are derived from changes in the fair value of non-qualifying interest rate swap agreements. |
|
|
-28- |
|
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:(Continued) |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2005(Continued) |
|
Effective tax rates were an expense of 17.3% in 2006 and a benefit of 20% in 2005. The rates are based on the current estimate of full year results after the effect for any taxes related to specific events which are recorded in the interim period in which they occur. During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, benefit adjustments of $0.8 million related to specific events were recorded which decreased the estimated effective tax rate for the quarter from 24.1% to 17.3%. We estimate the effective tax rate for the full fiscal year to be 27% after absorption of discrete items. During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, adjustments of $17.7 million related to deferred tax asset valuation allowance adjustments were recorded as specific events. The net effect on the 2005 tax provision was to decrease the effective tax rate from a benefit of 37% to 20%. |
|
Losses from discontinued operationsof $3.8 million in 2006 and $2.7 million in 2005 are attributable to the discontinuation of operations in Italy and Mozambique of the combined company, non-tobacco operations of former DIMON and the wool operations of Standard. See Note 5 “Discontinued Operations” to the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information. |
|
OUTLOOK AND OTHER INFORMATION: |
|
We entered fiscal 2007 as a stronger company following our merger and last year’s considerable merger related restructuring charges and significant challenges posed by our industry operating environment. We continue to execute our merger integration according to plan and are on track to complete the integration process and further refine our footprint in fiscal 2007. We remain focused on profit improvement and return on assets through a combination of improved pricing, cost reductions, efficiency improvements and on debt reduction through aggressive working capital management. |
We are beginning to make some progress in increasing prices against a backdrop of increasing costs of production, rising interest rates and a weak U.S. dollar. However, the environment remains challenging particularly in Brazil. The 2006 Brazilian crop started the year as an average quality crop, however, the quality declined significantly due to weather related growing conditions in the latter part of the season. This has impacted both demand and pricing. We plan to reduce tobacco production in Brazil for the 2007 crop based on our current global projections of supply and demand. As a result of these factors we have increased the 2006 crop provision for grower bad debt on advances to farmers. |
During the current quarter, we entered into an agreement with the government of Rio Grande do Sul, the state in which our processing facilities are located in Brazil. We will be able to transfer accumulated intrastate trade taxes related to the 2005 crop instead of having to absorb those costs. This transference is in accordance with agreed upon amounts and timing in future quarters. We are evaluating options to determine the most feasible strategy to minimize the impact of intrastate trade taxes related to future crops. |
|
MERGER INTEGRATION |
Merger integration remains in line with our strategic plan including over $50 million in cost savings realized in fiscal 2006 which we anticipate will increase to $115 million annually by fiscal 2007. The review process is continuing and remaining one time cash costs to complete the integration are currently estimated at approximately $15 million to $17 million in 2007. As part of the integration process to strengthen our core business overall, we have focused on achieving appropriate returns that support the strategic rational for our merger, including undertaking asset sales that will continue to have an important role in refining our footprint. As announced in February, an agreement was reached to sell our Spanish production facilities. This sale was concluded on August 1, 2006. We previously disclosed that we had also entered into a non-binding letter of intent to sell our interest in the dark air-cured tobacco business, Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas, S.A. These negotiations are proceeding. |
|
|
-29- |
|
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS: |
|
Readers are cautioned that the statements contained herein regarding expectations for our performance are “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on current expectations of future events. If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from our expectations and projections. Risks and uncertainties include changes in the timing of anticipated shipments, changes in anticipated geographic product sourcing, political instability in sourcing locations, currency and interest rate fluctuations, shifts in the global supply and demand position for our tobacco products, and the impact of regulation and litigation on our customers. A further list and description of these risks, uncertainties and other factors can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments, except as required by law. |
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
Derivatives Policies: Hedging interest rate exposure using swaps and hedging foreign exchange exposure using forward contracts are specifically contemplated to manage risk in keeping with management’s policies. We may use derivative instruments, such as swaps or forwards, which are based directly or indirectly upon interest rates and currencies to manage and reduce the risks inherent in interest rate and currency fluctuations. |
We do not utilize derivatives for speculative purposes, and we do not enter into market risk sensitive instruments for trading purposes. Derivatives are transaction specific so that a specific debt instrument, contract, or invoice determines the amount, maturity, and other specifics of the hedge. |
|
Foreign exchange rates:Our business is generally conducted in U.S. dollars, as is the business of the tobacco industry as a whole. However, local country operating costs, including the purchasing and processing costs for tobaccos, are subject to the effects of exchange fluctuations of the local currency against the U.S. dollar. We attempt to minimize such currency risks by matching the timing of our working capital borrowing needs against the tobacco purchasing and processing funds requirements in the currency of the country where the tobacco is grown. Also, in some cases, our sales pricing arrangements with our customers allow adjustments for the effect of currency exchange fluctuations on local purchasing and processing costs. Fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies can significantly affect our operating results. We have recognized exchange gains in our statements of income of $1.9 million and $5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
Our consolidated selling, administrative and general expenses denominated in foreign currencies are subject to translation risks from currency exchange fluctuations. These foreign denominated expenses are primarily denominated in the euro, sterling and Brazilian real. The weakening U.S. dollar against the real may continue to significantly impact translated results. |
|
Interest rates:We manage our exposure to interest rate risk through the proportion of fixed rate and variable rate debt in our total debt portfolio. A 1% change in interest rates would increase or decrease our reported interest cost by approximately $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. A substantial portion of our borrowings are denominated in U.S. dollars and bear interest at commonly quoted rates. |
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated, with the participation of other members of management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. |
|
|
-30- |
|
|
Alliance One International, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS: (Continued) |
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures (Continued) |
|
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
In addition, as required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act, the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the Company’s internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
Part II. Other Information |
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
|
Since October 2001, the Directorate General for Competition (DGCOMP) of the European Commission (EC) has been conducting an administrative investigation into certain tobacco buying and selling practices alleged to have occurred within the leaf tobacco industry in some countries within the European Union, including Spain, Italy, Greece and potentially other countries. DIMON and Standard subsidiaries in Spain, Italy and Greece have been subject to these investigations. In respect of the investigation into practices in Spain, in 2004, the EC fined DIMON and its Spanish subsidiaries €2.6 million (US$3.4 million) and Standard and its Spanish subsidiaries €1.82 million (US$2.3 million). In respect of the investigation into practices in Italy, in October 2005, the EC announced that Alliance One and Mindo (our former subsidiary) have been assessed a fine in the aggregate amount of €10 million (US$12 million) and that, in addition, Alliance One and Transcatab, a subsidiary of Standard prior to its merger into DIMON, have been assessed a fine in the aggregate amount of €14 million (US$16.8 million). With respect to both the Spanish and Italian investigations, the fines imposed on us and our predecessors and subsidiaries were part of fines assessed on several participants in the applicable industry. With respect to the investigation relating to Greece, the EC informed DIMON and Standard in March 2005 it had closed its investigation in relation to the Greek leaf tobacco industry buying and selling practices. We, along with our applicable subsidiaries, have appealed the decisions of the Commission with respect to Spain and Italy to the Court of First Instance of the European Commission for the annulment or modification of the decision; but the outcome of the appeals process as to both timing and results is uncertain. We fully recognized the impact of each of the fines set forth above, and actually paid all of such fines as part of the appeal process. |
|
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
|
No changes |
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
None |
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
None |
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
None |
|
Item 5. Other Information |
|
None. |
|
|
-31- |