Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 3 Months Ended |
Apr. 04, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Fiscal Year | ' |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
The 2014 fiscal year is a 52 week Fiscal Year (“Fiscal Year 2014”) with four fiscal quarters of thirteen weeks each ended on April 4, July 4, October 2 and January 2, 2015. The 2013 fiscal year was a 53 week Fiscal Year (“Fiscal Year 2013”) with the first fiscal quarter of fourteen weeeks ended on April 5 and three fiscal quarters of thirteen weeks each ended on July 5, October 4 and January 3, 2014 (each a “Fiscal Quarter”). |
Basis of Presentation | ' |
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We have revised certain prior period presentations to reflect the correction of certain errors. In particular: |
|
| - | During the fiscal year ended January 3, 2014, we identified an error in our historical accounting for the factoring of our receivables to Wells Fargo, resulting in an understatement of our assets and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of April 5, 2013 and December 28, 2012 by $69.1 million and $68.8 million, respectively. The error had no impact on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013. Accordingly, the correction had no impact on revenues, operating income, taxable income, net income or net changes in cash for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013. | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| - | During the fiscal year ended January 3, 2014, we also identified an error in our accounting for stock-based compensation expense relating to awards of shares, warrants to acquire common stock, and employee stock options as previously reported. The error resulted in an understatement of our selling, general and administrative expenses included in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013 by approximately $0.3 million. The Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013 included herein has been revised to correct this error. The correction had no impact on revenues or net change in cash for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013. | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| - | During the fiscal year ended January 3, 2014, we also identified an error in our accounting for deferred tax liabilities relating to the amortization of indefinite-life intangibles that originated during 2005, resulting in an understatement in liabilities in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of April 5, 2013 and December 28, 2012 of $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively. The error also understated our deferred income tax provision included in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013 by approximately $0.1 million. The Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013 included herein has been revised to correct this error. The correction had no impact on revenues, operating income, taxable income, or net change in cash for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013. | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| - | During the fiscal year ended January 3, 2014, we also identified a number of miscellaneous errors relating to our accounting for cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, other liabilities and business combinations that resulted in an overstatement of assets included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of April 5, 2013 of $1.7 million and an understatement of assets included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 28, 2012 of $0.7 million. These errors also understated our operating income included in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013 by $7,000 and overstated our taxable income and net income included in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013 by $61,000 each. The Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013 included herein has been revised to correct these errors. | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| - | During the fiscal year ended January 3, 2014, we also evaluated our consolidation of Abest Power & Gas, LLC (“Abest”), our joint venture in retail energy, and determined that Abest is an entity that should not be consolidated. We had presented the results of Abest as a consolidated entity in our financial statements as of and for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 5, 2013. While the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 3, 2014 and April 4, 2014 and the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Fiscal Quarter ended April 4, 2014 and April 5, 2013, included herein, do not include the assets, liabilities or equity of Abest, we do include our investment in Abest under the equity method of investment and report the loss for Abest as a loss on equity investment. | | | | | | |
|
|
|
The corrections of these errors had no impact on our compliance with any contractual obligations. |
Consolidation | ' |
|
Consolidation |
|
|
|
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
We have ownership and other interests in various entities, including corporations, partnerships and limited liability companies. For each such entity, we evaluate our ownership and other interests to determine whether we should consolidate the entity or account for our ownership interest as an investment. As part of our evaluation, we initially determine whether the entity is a variable interest entity ("VIE") and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE. An entity is generally a VIE if it meets any of the following criteria: (i) the entity has insufficient equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, (ii) the equity investors cannot make significant decisions about the entity's operations, or (iii) the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity or receive the expected returns of the entity and substantially all of the entity's activities involve or are conducted on behalf of the investor with disproportionately fewer voting rights. We consolidate VIEs for which we are the primary beneficiary, regardless of our ownership or voting interests. The primary beneficiary is the party involved with the VIE that (i) has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, and (ii) has the obligation to absorb gains or losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. We periodically make judgments in determining whether entities in which we invest are VIEs. If so, we then make judgments to determine whether we are the primary beneficiary and are thus required to consolidate the entity. |
|
|
|
If it is concluded that an entity is not a VIE, then we consider our proportional voting interests in the entity. We consolidate majority-owned subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is maintained. Controlling interest is determined by majority ownership and the absence of significant third-party participating rights. |
|
|
|
Ownership interests in entities for which we have significant influence and are not consolidated under our consolidation policy are accounted for as equity method investments. Related party transactions between the Company and its equity method investees, if any, have not been eliminated. Please see Acquisitions and Joint Ventures. |
Use of Estimates | ' |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
|
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but are not limited to: (1) revenue recognition; (2) asset impairments; (3) depreciable and amortizable lives of assets; (4) fair value of stock-based compensation; (5) allocation of direct and indirect cost of sales; (6) fair value of identifiable purchased tangible and intangible assets in a business combination; (7) fair value of reporting units for goodwill impairment test; and (8) the estimate of income taxes. Actual results could significantly differ from those estimates. |
Per Share Information | ' |
|
Per Share Information |
|
|
|
We present both basic and diluted earnings per share amounts (“EPS”). Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects any potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock, such as options and convertible preferred stock, were exercised or converted into common stock or could otherwise cause the issuance of common stock that then would have shared in earnings. During any period in which we report a loss, we do not adjust the number of shares outstanding for potentially dilutive securities for dividing into the net loss, since such adjustment would be anti-dilutive. |
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of basic and diluted shares (amounts in thousands): |
|
|
|
| | For the Fiscal Quarter ended | |
| | 4-Apr-14 | | | 5-Apr-13 | |
| | | | | | | (Revised) | |
Basic weighted average shares of common stock outstanding | | | 158,015 | | | | 159,433 | |
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants | | | - | | | | - | |
Diluted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding | | | 158,015 | | | | 159,433 | |
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share is computed using the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per common share is computed using the diluted weighted average number of common shares which include any common equivalent shares calculated to be outstanding during the period. For the Fiscal Quarter ended April 4, 2014 and April 5, 2013, the effect of approximately 4.8 million and 0.3 million common equivalent shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss sustained during the period. |
Revenue Recognition | ' |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
|
|
Revenue is generally recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, products have been delivered or services have been rendered, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. The vast majority of our arrangements do not fall within the scope of the multiple-deliverable guidance. For those arrangements within the scope of the multiple-deliverable guidance, a deliverable constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has stand-alone value and there are no customer-negotiated refunds or return rights for the delivered elements. For multiple-element arrangements, composed only of software products and related services or only services, we allocate revenue to each element in an arrangement based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if applicable, third-party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (“ESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. Total transaction revenue is allocated to the multiple elements based on each element’s relative selling price compared to the total selling price. All our elements allocations are based on ESP. |
|
|
|
The following revenue recognition policies define the manner in which we account for specific transaction types: |
|
|
|
Staffing Services |
|
Revenue is primarily derived from supplying contingent staff to our customers or providing other services on a time and material basis. Contingent staff primarily consist of contingent employees working under contract for a fixed period of time or on a specific customer project. Revenue is also derived from permanent placement services, which are generally recognized after placements are made and when the fees are not contingent upon any future event. |
|
|
|
Reimbursable costs, including those related to travel and out-of-pocket expenses, are also included in net revenue and equivalent amounts of reimbursable costs are included in direct cost of staffing services revenue. |
|
|
|
Under certain of our service arrangements, contingent staff is provided to customers through contracts involving other vendors or contractors. When we are the principal in the transaction and therefore the primary obligor for the contingent staff, we record the gross amount of the revenue and expense from the service arrangement. When we act only as an agent for the customer and are not the primary obligor for the contingent staff, we record revenue net of vendor or contractor costs. |
|
|
|
We are generally the primary obligor when we are responsible for the fulfillment of the services under the contract, even if the contingent workers are neither our employees nor directly contracted by us. Usually in these situations the contractual relationship with the vendors and contractors is exclusively with us and we bear customer credit risk and generally have latitude in establishing vendor pricing and have discretion in vendor or contractor selection. |
|
|
|
Software Systems |
|
Revenue primarily relates to sales of staffing support software systems and enhancements to existing systems. These arrangements generally contain multiple elements including software development and customization, sale of software licenses, installation, implementation and integration services, as well as post-contract customer support (“PCS”). Revenue is recognized under these arrangements following the revenue recognition accounting guidance primarily related to software transactions and multiple element arrangements. To date, the revenue recorded for software or related services under this accounting treatment has been minimal. |
|
|
|
Subscription Revenues |
|
Subscription and other recurring revenues include fees for access rights to software solutions that are offered under a subscription-based delivery model where the users do not take possession of the software. Under this model, the software applications are hosted by us and the customer accesses and uses the software on an as-needed basis over the Internet. To date, the revenue recorded under this accounting treatment has been minimal. |
Cash | ' |
|
Cash |
|
|
|
We consider cash on hand and deposits in banks as cash. At times, cash balances on deposit exceed federally insured limits; however, to date, we have not experienced any losses in such accounts and management believes that the risk of loss is negligible. |
Accounts Receivable and Related Allowance | ' |
|
Accounts Receivable and Related Allowance |
|
|
|
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from our clients failing to make required payments for services rendered. Management estimates this allowance based upon knowledge of the financial condition of our clients, review of historical receivables and reserve trends and other pertinent information. If the financial condition of our clients deteriorates or there is an unfavorable trend in aggregate receivable collections, additional allowances may be required. We review the adequacy of the allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable on a quarterly basis and, if necessary, increase or decrease the balance by recording a charge or credit to selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses for the portion of the adjustment relating to uncollectible accounts receivable. |
|
|
|
We fund our accounts receivable via a receivables-backed credit facility (the "Facility") with a financial institution. We receive 90% of the face value of qualified receivables as defined in the Facility. Since we retain risk of loss on the receivables, the agreement provides that receivables that are older than 90 days (120 days in certain categories of receivables) cease to be qualified at the discretion of the financial institution. In most cases, our customer pays the financial institution directly for the receivables under the Facility. The Facility calls for net settlement twice weekly. Additionally, the Facility is guaranteed by our majority shareholder. We record each cash amount advanced and repaid as an increase or decrease to the Facility respectively. We record customer payments made directly to the lender as a reduction in Accounts receivable and the Facility. |
|
|
|
Our concentration of credit risk is limited due to the large number of customers comprising our customer base and their dispersion across different business and geographic areas. We monitor our exposure to credit losses and maintain an allowance for anticipated losses. To reduce credit risk, we perform credit checks on all our customers. |
Related Party | ' |
|
Related Party |
|
|
|
We have significant transactions with our majority shareholder who is the beneficial owner of approximately 80% and 90% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of April 4, 2014 and January 3, 2014, respectively, and had the ability to exercise control over us. |
|
|
|
We classify assets and liabilities to related parties on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows: |
|
|
|
| • | Related party receivable represent amounts due from a related party. | | | | | | |
| • | Accrued wages and related obligations – due to related party represent accrued wages, taxes and other related items that have not yet been invoiced. | | | | | | |
| • | Long-term debt - related party represents the amount due for long-term borrowings from a related party that is considered a current liability. | | | | | | |
| • | Long-term debt - related party, net of current portion represents the total amount due for long-term borrowings from a related party less the current portion of the debt. | | | | | | |
|
|
|
We classify revenue and expenses from related parties in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows: |
|
|
|
| • | Revenues from related parties are revenues for sales of services and software to related parties. | | | | | | |
| • | Direct cost of producing revenues purchased from related parties are PEO fees and reimbursements for our staffing service provided by related parties. | | | | | | |
| • | Selling, general and administrative expenses - related parties represents PEO fees for selling, general and administrative expenses incurred on our behalf. | | | | | | |
| • | Interest expense - related party is interest expense incurred for related party loans and advances. | | | | | | |
|
|
|
In addition, we had related party transactions involving acquisitions and debt extinguishment in exchange for our common stock. Please see Related Party Transactions. |
Equity-Based Compensation | ' |
|
Equity-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
We grant equity-based awards, such as stock options and restricted stock or restricted stock units, to certain key employees and consultants to create a clear and meaningful alignment between compensation and shareholder return and to enable the employees and consultants to develop and maintain a stock ownership position. While the majority of our equity awards feature time-based vesting, performance-based equity awards, which are awarded from time to time to certain key Company executives, vest as a function of performance and may also be subject to the recipient’s continued employment which also acts as a significant retention incentive. |
|
|
|
Equity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period. In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the date of grant we apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model are assumptions related to risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, expected stock-price volatility and option life. |
|
|
|
The risk-free rate assumed in valuing the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. We have not historically paid dividends and do not currently expect to in the future. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on objective data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and option life assumptions require a level of judgment which make them critical accounting estimates. |
|
|
|
We use an expected stock-price volatility based on the average expected volatilities of a sampling of companies with similar attributes to us, including industry, stage of life cycle, size and financial leverage. |
|
|
|
The expected option term, representing the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, is estimated using our limited historical post vesting exercise and employee termination behavior. |
|
|
|
We estimate forfeitures using our historical experience, which is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ or are expected to differ from such estimates. Because of the significant amount of judgment used in these calculations, it is reasonably likely that circumstances may cause the estimate to change. |
|
|
|
With regard to the weighted-average option life assumption, we consider the exercise behavior of past grants and model the pattern of aggregate exercises. |
|
|
|
We settle the exercise of stock options with newly issued shares. |
|
|
|
With respect to grants of performance based awards, we assess the probability that such performance criteria will be met in order to determine the compensation expense. Consequently, the compensation expense is recognized straight-line over the vesting period. If that assessment of the probability of the performance condition being met changes, we would recognize the impact of the change in estimate in the period of the change. As with the use of any estimate, and due to the significant judgment used to derive those estimates, actual results may vary. |
|
|
|
We have elected to treat future awards with only service conditions and with graded vesting as one award. Consequently, the total compensation expense would be recognized straight-line over the entire vesting period, so long as the compensation cost recognized at any given vest date at least equals the portion of the grant date fair value of the award that has vested. |
Property and Equipment | ' |
|
Property and Equipment |
|
|
|
Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation cost is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: |
|
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures | 5 years | | | | | | | |
Office Equipment | 3 years | | | | | | | |
Computer Equipment | 3 years | | | | | | | |
Software | 3 years | | | | | | | |
Leasehold Improvements | Shorter of life or term of lease | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Long-lived tangible assets are tested for impairment when there are indicators of impairment. Indicators of impairment include: changes in the value of property and equipment; changes in expected future operating income; changes in business trends and prospects; and changes in demand, competition and other economic factors. |
Intangible Assets | ' |
|
Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
Goodwill represents the excess cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. We account for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives in accordance with relevant accounting guidance related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which states that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should not be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. Our policy is to perform this annual impairment test in the fourth quarter, using a measurement date as of the first day of our fiscal fourth quarter or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. |
|
|
|
The guidance provides an option for an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, performing the two-step (quantitative) impairment test is unnecessary. |
|
|
|
In order to perform the qualitative or quantitative testing, we determine if it is appropriate to use the operating segment, as defined under guidance for segment reporting, as the reporting unit, or one level below the operating segment, depending on whether certain criteria are met. In identifying the reporting units management considers the economic characteristics of the reporting units including the products and services provided, production processes, types or classes of customer and product distribution. |
|
|
|
If we determine that for a particular reporting unit that it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we perform the first step of the two-step impairment test. |
|
|
|
We perform this impairment test by first comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their respective carrying amount. Since reported quoted market prices exactly comparable to our reporting units are not available, when determining the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, we utilize a blend of discounted future cash flows, market multiples of similar companies that have quoted prices and market capitalization reconciliation. Developing the estimate of the discounted future cash flows require significant judgment and projections of future financial performance. The key assumptions used in developing the discounted future cash flows are the projection of future revenues and expenses, working capital requirements, residual growth rates and the weighted average cost of capital. In developing our financial projections, we consider historical data, current internal estimates and market growth trends. Changes to any of these assumptions could materially change the fair value of the reporting unit. We reconcile the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to our adjusted market capitalization as a supporting calculation. The adjusted market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the average share price of our common stock for the last ten trading days prior to the measurement date by the number of outstanding common shares and adding a control premium. |
|
|
|
If the carrying value of the reporting units exceeds the fair value we would then compare the implied fair value of our goodwill to the carrying amount in order to determine the amount of the impairment, if any. |
Income Taxes | ' |
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
|
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for estimated tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end, based on enacted tax laws and statutory rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized when, in Management’s opinion, it is more likely than not that the future tax benefits from some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. |
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP requires that, in applying the liability method, the financial statement effects of an uncertain tax position be recognized based on the outcome that is more likely than not to occur. Under this criterion the most likely resolution of an uncertain tax position should be analyzed based on technical merits and on the outcome that will likely be sustained under examination. |
Business Combinations | ' |
|
Business Combinations |
|
|
|
We have made strategic acquisitions to expand our footprint, establish strategic partnerships and/or to obtain technology that is complementary to our product offerings and strategy. We evaluate each investment in a business to determine if we should account for the investment as a cost-basis investment, an equity investment, a business combination or a common control transaction. An investment in which we do not have a controlling interest and which we are not the primary beneficiary but where we have the ability to exert significant influence is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. For those investments that we account for in accordance Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations, we record the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at our estimate of their fair values on the date of the business combination. Our assessment of the estimated fair value of each of these can have a material effect on our reported results as intangible assets are amortized over various lives. Furthermore, a change in the estimated fair value of an asset or liability often has a direct impact on the amount to recognize as goodwill, which is not amortized. Often determining the fair value of these assets and liabilities assumed requires an assessment of the expected use of the asset, the expected cost to extinguish a liability or our expectations related to the timing and the successful completion of the integration of the business. Such estimates are inherently difficult and subjective and can have a material impact on our financial statements. We account for business combinations under a method similar to the pooling-of-interest method ("Pooling-of-Interest") when the combination is with a business under common control with us by our majority shareholder. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | ' |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
We believe that of our financial instruments, including: cash; accounts receivable; accounts payable and accrued liabilities; and long-term debt - related party, which are reflected at their carrying value in the consolidated financial statements, approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities. The fair value of contingent considerations, including current maturities, is estimated based on analysis of outcome probabilities and applying a discounted cash flow analysis, based on the estimated current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of securities. |
Translation of Foreign Currencies | ' |
|
Translation of Foreign Currencies |
|
|
|
Our international subsidiaries operate using local functional currencies. Foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, and income and expense accounts and cash flow items are translated at average monthly exchange rates during the respective periods. Net exchange gains or losses resulting from the translation of foreign financial statements and the effect of exchange rates on intercompany transactions of a long-term investment nature are recorded as a separate component of equity in accumulated other comprehensive income. Any foreign currency gains or losses related to transactions are included in operating results. |
Segment Reporting | ' |
Segment Reporting |
|
Operating segments are components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. Two or more operating segments may be aggregated into a single reportable segment if they have similar economic characteristics and are similar in the following areas: the nature of products and services; nature of production processes; type or class of customer; methods used to distribute products or provide services; and the nature of the regulatory environment, if applicable. We have aggregated our two operating segments (staffing and Summit Software) into one reportable segment -staffing. Our staffing segment has similar types of products, contracts, customers and employees. In addition, we have similar long-term average margins across the staffing operating segment. Summit Software does not meet the size criteria to be its own reporting segment and therefore is aggregated into our single staffing reporting segment. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer, who reviews financial information presented on a Company-wide basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. |
|
In fiscal 2013, with the acquisition of FlexPlus we acquired and operate facilities in the United Kingdom. As of April 4, 2014 and January 3, 2014, 98% and 97%, of our assets are located in the United States, respectively. |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards to be Adopted | ' |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Standards to be Adopted |
|
|
|
In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts and Customers (Topic 606), to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") that would (1) provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue recognition; (2) improve comparability of revenue recognition practice across entities, industries, jurisdictions and capital market; and (3) provide more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements. This standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the effect the adoption of this standard will have, if any, on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In April 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosure requirements. This ASU addresses sources of confusion and inconsistent application related to financial reporting of discontinued operations in U.S. GAAP. Under this guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014. This ASU is effective for us prospectively on January 03, 2015. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. |