Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were $244.1 million, an increase of 43.8% from the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to increased sales in our retail business as well as our wholesale business.
Sales generated from our wholesale business contributed 50.3% or $122.9 million of our total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of 17.7% compared to $104.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to increased sales orders in the United Kingdom, United States, Europe-Other and the People’s Republic of China.
Sales generated from our retail business contributed 49.7% or $121.2 million of our total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of 85.6% compared to 38.5% or $65.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This increase was primarily due to the increase in same store sales and new stores opened. We had 904 LA GO GO stores as of September 30, 2013, compared to 644 LA GO GO stores at September 30, 2012.
Total retail store square footage and sales per square foot for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Total store square footage | | | 836,023 | | | | 565,701 | |
Number of stores | | | 904 | | | | 644 | |
Average store size, square feet | | | 925 | | | | 878 | |
Total store sales | | $ | 121,216,895 | | | $ | 65,321,197 | |
Sales per square foot | | $ | 145 | | | $ | 115 | |
Same store sales and newly opened store sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Sales from stores open a full year | | $ | 87,912,225 | | | $ | 47,206,937 | |
Newly opened store sales | | | 27,617,747 | | | | 14,926,667 | |
Other* | | | 5,686,923 | | | | 3,187,593 | |
Total | | $ | 121,216,895 | | | $ | 65,321,197 | |
*Primarily sales from stores that were closed in the current reporting period.
We remodeled or relocated 119 stores in 2012, and we plan to relocate or remodel 200 stores in 2013. Remodels and relocations typically drive incremental same-store sales growth. A relocation typically results in an improved, more visible and accessible location, and usually includes increased square footage. We believe we will continue to have opportunities for additional remodels and relocations beyond 2013. Same-store sales are calculated based upon stores that were open at least 12 full fiscal months in each reporting period and remain open at the end of each reporting period.
Costs and Expenses
Cost of Sales and Gross Margin
Cost of sales includes the direct raw material cost, direct labor cost, outsourced production cost and manufacturing overhead including depreciation of production equipment and rent, consistent with the revenue earned. Cost of sales excludes warehousing costs, which historically have not been significant.
The following table sets forth the components of our cost of sales and gross profit both in amounts and as a percentage of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
| | Nine months ended September 30, | | | Growth (Decrease) | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | In 2013 | |
| | (in U.S. dollars, except for percentages) | | | | |
Net Sales for Wholesale Sales | | $ | 122,883,599 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 104,369,912 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 17.7 | % |
Raw Materials | | | 57,897,989 | | | | 47.1 | | | | 49,706,704 | | | | 47.6 | | | | 16.5 | |
Labor | | | 3,568,137 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 3,287,022 | | | | 3.1 | | | | 8.6 | |
Outsourced Production Costs | | | 36,787,939 | | | | 29.9 | | | | 31,959,810 | | | | 30.6 | | | | 15.1 | |
Other and Overhead | | | 415,772 | | | | 0.4 | | | | 420,575 | | | | 0.4 | | | | (1.1 | ) |
Total Cost of Sales for Wholesale | | | 98,669,837 | | | | 80.3 | | | | 85,374,111 | | | | 81.8 | | | | 15.6 | |
Gross Profit for Wholesale | | | 24,213,762 | | | | 19.7 | | | | 18,995,801 | | | | 18.2 | | | | 27.5 | |
Net Sales for Retail | | | 121,216,895 | | | | 100.0 | | | | 65,321,197 | | | | 100.0 | | | | 85.6 | |
Production Costs | | | 39,086,444 | | | | 32.2 | | | | 20,692,184 | | | | 31.7 | | | | 88.9 | |
Rent | | | 41,167,891 | | | | 34.0 | | | | 23,107,077 | | | | 35.4 | | | | 78.2 | |
Total Cost of Sales for Retail | | | 80,254,335 | | | | 66.2 | | | | 43,799,261 | | | | 67.1 | | | | 83.2 | |
Gross Profit for Retail | | | 40,962,560 | | | | 33.8 | | | | 21,521,936 | | | | 32.9 | | | | 90.3 | |
Total Cost of Sales | | | 178,924,172 | | | | 73.3 | | | | 129,173,371 | | | | 76.1 | | | | 38.5 | |
Gross Profit | | $ | 65,176,322 | | | | 26.7 | % | | $ | 40,517,738 | | | | 23.9 | % | | | 60.9 | % |
Raw material costs for our wholesale business were 47.1% of our total wholesale business sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, a slight decrease compared to 47.6% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Labor costs for our wholesale business were 2.9% of our total wholesale business sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 3.1% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The marginal decrease was mainly due to the fact that we outsourced most of the new orders in 2013.
Outsourced manufacturing costs for our wholesale business were 29.9% of our total sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 30.6% in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This decrease was primarily attributable to outsourced orders of approximately $14.3 million to our related entities in Vietnam and Cambodia, which have lower labor costs compared to orders outsourced to Chinese factories.
Overhead and other expenses for our wholesale business accounted for 0.4% of our total wholesale business sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 0.4% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Gross profit in our wholesale business for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $24.2 million, an increase of 27.5% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012. As a percentage of wholesale sales, gross profit accounted for 19.7% of our total wholesale sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of 1.5% compared to 18.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Increase in gross profit was primarily resulted from reduced outsourced production costs when more products were manufactured in Vietnam and Cambodia.
Production costs for our retail business were $39.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 versus $20.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. As a percentage of retail sales, retail production costs accounted for 32.2% of our total retail sales in the Nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to 31.7% of total retail sales in the Nine months ended September 30, 2012. This increase was primarily due to increase in manufacturing costs in China.
Rent costs for our retail business were $41.2 million or 34.0% of our total retail sales during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 versus $23.1 million or 35.4% during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Total rent costs increased as a result of the increase in the number of our stores. The decrease in rent costs as a percentage of total retail sales was due to an increase in same store sales in 2013.
Gross profit in our retail business for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $41.0 million and gross margin was 33.8%. Gross profit in our retail business for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $21.5 million and gross margin was 32.9%. The gross profit increased 90.3% was primarily due to increase in same store sales and reduced rental costs.
Total cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $178.9 million, an increase of 38.5% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012. As a percentage of total sales, our cost of sales decreased to 73.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 76.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Consequently, gross margin increased to 26.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from 23.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
We purchase the majority of our raw materials directly from numerous local fabric and accessories suppliers. For our wholesale business, purchases from our five largest suppliers represented approximately 18.9% and 16.7% of raw material purchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. No one supplier provided more than 10% of our raw material purchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. For our retail business, purchases from our five largest suppliers represented approximately 34.4% and 34.9% of raw material purchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. No one supplier provided more than 10% of our raw material purchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. One supplier provided 10.1% of our total purchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. We have not experienced difficulty in obtaining raw materials essential to our business, and we believe we maintain good relationships with our suppliers.
We also purchase finished goods from contract manufacturers. For our wholesale business, purchases from our five largest contract manufacturers represented approximately 46.7% and 41.2% of finished goods purchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Three contract manufacturers provided approximately 14.0%, 12.3% and 11.6% of our finished goods purchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Two contract manufacturers provided approximately 14.3% and 10% of our finished goods purchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. For our retail business, our five largest contract manufacturers represented approximately 15.3% and 14.6% of finished goods purchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. No contract manufacturer provided more than 10% of our retail finished goods purchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. We have not experienced difficulty in obtaining finished products from our contract manufacturers and we believe we maintain good relationships with our contract manufacturers.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Our selling expenses consist primarily of local transportation, unloading charges, product inspection charges, salaries for retail staff and decoration and marketing expenses associated with our retail business.
Our general and administrative expenses include administrative salaries, office expense, certain depreciation and amortization charges, repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees, warehousing costs and other expenses that are not directly attributable to our revenues.
Costs of our distribution network that are excluded from cost of sales consist of local transportation and unloading charges, and product inspection charges. Accordingly our gross profit amounts may not be comparable to those of other companies who include these amounts in costs of sales.
| | Nine months ended September 30, | | | Increase | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | (decrease) | |
| | (in U.S. Dollars, except for percentages) | | | | |
Gross Profit | | $ | 65,176,322 | | | | 26.7 | % | | $ | 40,517,738 | | | | 23.9 | % | | | 60.9 | % |
Operating Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling Expenses | | | 35,999,155 | | | | 14.8 | | | | 21,409,222 | | | | 12.6 | | | | 68.1 | |
General and Administrative Expenses | | | 16,670,132 | | | | 6.8 | | | | 11,355,568 | | | | 6.7 | | | | 46.8 | |
Total | | | 52,669,287 | | | | 21.6 | | | | 32,764,790 | | | | 19.3 | | | | 60.7 | |
Income from Operations | | $ | 12,507,035 | | | | 5.1 | % | | $ | 7,752,948 | | | | 4.6 | % | | | 61.3 | % |
Selling expenses were $36.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of 68.1% or $14.6 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012. As a percentage of total sales, selling expenses increased to 14.8% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 12.6% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was attributable to an increase in salaries and the number of retail staff, as well as increased decoration and marketing expenses associated with the promotion of LA GO GO.
General and administrative expenses were $16.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of 46.8% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012. As a percentage of total sales, general and administrative expenses increased to 6.8% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 6.7% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was attributable to an increase in the number of Wholesale and retail management personnel.
Income from Operations
Income from operations increased 61.3% to $12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $7.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Income from operations for our wholesale business was $9.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $6.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. As a percentage of total wholesale sales, income from operations increased to 7.4% of total wholesale sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 6.5% of total wholesale sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was due to the increased sales in our wholesale business.
Income from operations for our retail business was $3.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $0.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. As a percentage of total retail sales, income from operations increased to 2.8% of total retail sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 1.5% of total retail sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was due to the increased sales in our retail business.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of 57.2% compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was due to increased bank loans as a result of our business expansion.
Change in fair value of derivative liability
Change in fair value of derivative liability was a gain of $0.30 million and $0.38 million, based on the Binnomial Lattice model, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The warrants expired in June 2013. At the expiration date, the remaining value of the warrants not exercised was reduced to $0.
Income Tax Expenses
Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $2.4 million, an increase of 138.7% compared to the same period of 2012. The increase was primarily due to increased profits of Taixin and LA GO GO.
Net Income
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $9.7 million, an increase of 43.7% compared to the same period in 2012. Our diluted earnings per share were $0.66 and $0.46 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Summary of Cash Flows
Net cash used in operating activities was $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $16.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in inventories and decrease in accounts payable.
Net cash used in investing activities was $6.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared with $5.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was mainly due to increased equipment purchases.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $9.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared with net cash used in financing activities of $10.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we repaid $78.4 million of bank loans and received bank loan proceeds of $78.5 million. Also, under the counter-guarantee agreement, we advanced $7.2 million to the related party and received $18.7 million from the related party during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of $11.7 million, other current assets of $161.1 million and current liabilities of $142.6 million. We presently finance our operations primarily from cash flows from operations and bank loans and we anticipate that these will continue to be our primary sources of funds to finance our short-term cash needs.
Bank Loans
On June 14, 2013, Goldenway entered into a line of credit agreement with Nanjing Bank, which allows the Company to borrow up to approximately $8.13 million (RMB50 million). The line of credit is collateralized by the Company’s property and equipment. As of September 30, 2013, Goldenway had borrowed $8.13 million (RMB50 million) under this line of credit from Nanjing Bank with an annual interest rate ranging from 5.88% to 6.16% and due on various dates from October 2013 to March 2014. Approximately $1.63 million (RMB10 million) was repaid subsequent to September 30, 2013.
On June 14, 2013, Ever-Glory Apparel entered into a line of credit agreement for approximately $9.77 million (RMB60 million) with Nanjing Bank and guaranteed by Jiangsu Ever-Glory. As of September 30, 2013, Ever-Glory Apparel had borrowed $3.25 million (RMB 20 million) under this line of credit with annual interest rates from 5.88% to 6.6% and due from January to September 2014. Ever-Glory Apparel had also borrowed $4.52 million from Nanjing Bank with annual interest rates ranging from 2.1% to 2.2% and due on various dates from October to December 2013, and collateralized by approximately $6.46 million of accounts receivable from wholesale customers. At September 30, 2013, approximately $2.0 million was unused and available under this line of credit. Approximately $1.67 million was repaid subsequent to September 30, 2013.
On April 10, 2012, LA GO GO entered into a revolving line of credit agreement with Nanjing Bank, which allows the Company to borrow up to approximately $3.25 million (RMB20 million). The line of credit is guaranteed by Jiangsu Ever-Glory and Mr. Kang. As of September 30, 2013, LA GO GO had borrowed $1.63 million (RMB10 million) under this line of credit with annual interest rates ranging from 6.16% to 6.44% and due on various dates from October 2013 to January 2014. At September 30, 2013, approximately $1.62 million (RMB10 million) was unused and available under this line of credit. Approximately $0.81 million was repaid subsequent to September 30, 2013.
On January 4, 2011, Goldenway entered into a revolving line of credit agreement for approximately $6.5 million (RMB40 million) with Shanghai Pudong Development Bank. As of September 30, 2013, Goldenway had borrowed the maximum amount available under the line of $6.50 million (RMB40 million), with an annual interest rate of 6.3%. These loans are collateralized by certain properties and land use rights of Goldenway, and are due in November 2013.
As of September 30, 2013, Ever-Glory Apparel had borrowed $5.2 million (RMB32 million) from the Bank of Communications with an annual interest rate of 6.3% and due in February 2014. The loan is guaranteed by Jiangsu Ever-Glory and Mr. Kang. This loan is also collateralized by assets of Jiangsu Ever-Glory’s equity investee, Nanjing Knitting, under a collateral agreement executed among the Company, Jiangsu Ever-Glory, Nanjing Knitting and the bank. Ever-Glory Apparel had also borrowed $2.95 million from the Bank of Communications with an annual interest rate of 3.4%, due on various dates from October to December 2013, and collateralized by approximately $4.2 million of accounts receivable from wholesale customers.
As of September 30, 2013, LA GO GO had borrowed $1.62 million (RMB10 million) from the Bank of Communications with an annual interest rate of 6.3% and due in July 2014. This loan is guaranteed by Jiangsu Ever-Glory and Mr. Kang.
On July 29, 2011, Ever-Glory Apparel and Perfect Dream collectively entered into a secured banking facility agreement for a combined revolving import facility, letter of credit, invoice financing facilities and a credit line for treasury products of up to $7.0 million with the Nanjing Branch of HSBC (China) Company Limited (“HSBC”). This agreement is guaranteed by the Company and Mr. Kang. As of September 30, 2013, Ever-Glory Apparel had borrowed $5.4 million ($0.6 million and RMB 30 million) from HSBC with annual interest rates ranging 5.6% to 5.88% and due on various dates from October to December 2013, and collateralized by approximately $7.7 million of accounts receivable from international wholesale customers. These bank loans are to be repaid upon receipt of payments from customers. As of September 30, 2013, approximately $1.6 million was unused and available. Approximately $2.39 million was repaid subsequent to September 30, 2013.
As of September 30, 2013, Ever-Glory Apparel had borrowed $2.75 million from China Minsheng Bank, with annual interest rate of 2.93% and due in November 2013 and collateralized by approximately $3.9 million of accounts receivable from wholesale customers.
As of September 30, 2013, LA GO GO had borrowed $3.25 million (RMB 20 million) from China Minsheng Bank, with annual interest rate of 6.3% and due in August 2014. This loan is guaranteed by Ever-Glory Apparel and Mr. Kang.
As of September 30, 2013, Ever-Glory Apparel had borrowed $1.46 million from Ping An Bank, with annual interest rate of 6.3%, due in November 2013, and collateralized by approximately $2.09 million of accounts receivable from wholesale customers.
As of September 30, 2013, Ever-Glory Apparel had borrowed $1.63 million (RMB 10 million) from Hua Xia Bank, with annual interest rate of 6.6% and due in April 2014. This loan is guaranteed by Goldenway.
All bank loans are used to fund our daily operations.
Amounts due from related party
In March 2012, in consideration of the guarantees and collateral provided by Jiangsu Ever-Glory and Nanjing Knitting, the Company agreed to provide Jiangsu Ever-Glory a counter guarantee in the form of cash of not less than 70% of the maximum aggregate lines of credit obtained by the Company. Jiangsu Ever-Glory is obligated to return the full amount of the counter-guarantee funds provided upon expiration or termination of the underlying lines of credit and is to pay annual interest at the rate of 6.0% of amounts provided. As of September 30, 2013, Jiangsu Ever-Glory has provided guarantees for approximately $45.7 million (RMB 281 million) of lines of credit obtained by the Company. Jiangsu Ever-Glory, and its 20.31% owned equity investee, Nanjing Knitting, have also provided their assets as collateral for certain of these lines of credit. The value of the collateral, as per appraisals obtained by the banks in connection with these lines of credit is approximately $21.46 million (RMB 132 million). Mr. Kang has also provided a personal guarantee for $22. 6 million (RMB139 million). During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, $7.32 million (RMB45 million) was provided to Jiangsu Ever-Glory under the counter-guarantee. As of September 30, 2013, the amount of the counter-guarantee had been reduced to $21.3 million (RMB131 million), which was 46.7% of the aggregate amount of lines of credit. This amount plus accrued interest of $2.14 million have been classified as a reduction of equity, consistent with the guidance of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins 4E and 4G.
Capital Commitments
We have a continuing program for improving our manufacturing facilities and increasing our LA GO GO stores. We anticipate that cash flows from operations and borrowings from banks will be adequate to pay for these capital commitments.
Uses of Liquidity
Our cash requirements for the next twelve months will be primarily to fund daily operations and the growth of our business.
Sources of Liquidity
Our primary sources of liquidity for our short-term cash needs are expected to be from cash flows generated from operations, and cash equivalents currently on hand. We believe that we will be able to borrow additional funds if necessary.
We believe our cash flows from operations together with our cash and cash equivalents currently on hand and our unused credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our needs for working capital, capital expenditure and other commitments for the next twelve months. No assurance can be made that additional financing will be available to us if required, and adequate funds may not be available on terms acceptable to us. If funding is insufficient at any time in the future, we will develop or enhance our products or services and expand our business through our own cash flows from operations.
As of September 30, 2013, we had access to $53.52 million in lines of credit, of which $5.22 million was unused and is currently available. These credit facilities do not include any covenants.
Foreign Currency Translation Risk
Our operations are, for the most part, located in the PRC, which may give rise to significant foreign currency risks from fluctuations and the degree of volatility of foreign exchange rates between the United States dollar and the Chinese RMB. Most of our sales are in United States (U.S.) dollars. During 2003 and 2004 the exchange rate of RMB to the U.S. dollar remained constant at 8.26 RMB to the dollar. On July 21, 2005, the Chinese government adjusted the exchange rate from 8.26 to 8.09 RMB to the U.S. dollar. From that time, the RMB continued to appreciate against the U.S. dollar. As of September 30, 2013, the foreign exchange rate had increased to 6.15 RMB to one U.S. dollar. We are continuously negotiating price adjustments with most of our customers based on the daily market foreign exchange rates, which we believe will reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations in the future, and we will pass some of the increased cost to our customers.
In addition, the financial statements of Goldenway, New-Tailun, Catch-Luck, Ever-Glory Apparel, Tai Xin and LA GO GO (whose functional currency is the RMB) are translated into US dollars using the current rate method. The balance sheet items are translated into US dollars using the exchange rates at the respective balance sheet dates. The capital and various reserves are translated at historical exchange rates prevailing at the time of the transactions while income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rate for the period. The foreign currency translation gain (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $670,518, $1,828,910, $ ($192,935) and $7,066, respectively.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to our investors.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio and have no foreign exchange contracts. Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, bank loans and long-term obligations. We consider investments in highly-liquid instruments purchased with a remaining maturity of 90 days or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Interest Rates: Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our short-term investments and short-term obligations; thus, fluctuations in interest rates would not have a material impact on the fair value of these securities. On September 30, 2013, we had $11.7 million in cash and cash equivalents. A hypothetical 5% increase or decrease in either the short term or long term interest rates would not have any material impact on our earnings or loss, or the fair market value or cash flows of these instruments.
Foreign Exchange Rates: We pay our suppliers and employees in Chinese RMB, however, most of our wholesale customers are located in the U.S., Japan and Europe and we generate sales from them in U.S. Dollars, Euros and British Pounds. Accordingly, our business has substantial exposure to changes in exchange rates between and among the Chinese RMB, the U.S. Dollar, the Euro and the British Pound. In the last decade, the RMB has been pegged at 8.26 RMB to one U.S. Dollar. On July 21, 2005 it was revalued to 8.09 per U.S. Dollar. Following the removal of the peg to the U.S. Dollar and pressure from the United States, the People’s Bank of China also announced that the RMB would be pegged to a basket of foreign currencies, rather than being strictly tied to the U.S. Dollar, and would be allowed to float trade within a narrow 0.3% daily band against this basket of currencies. The PRC government has stated that the basket is dominated by the U.S. Dollar, Euro, Japanese Yen and South Korean Won, with a smaller proportion made up of the British Pound, Thai Baht, Russian Ruble, Australian Dollar, Canadian Dollar and Singapore Dollar. There can be no assurance that the relationship between the RMB and these currencies will remain stable over time, especially in light of the significant political pressure on the Chinese government to permit the free flotation of the RMB, which could result in greater and more frequent fluctuations in the exchange rate between the RMB, the U.S. Dollar and the Euro. On September 30, 2013, the exchange rate between the RMB and U.S. Dollar was 6.15 RMB to one U.S. Dollar. For additional discussion regarding our foreign currency risk, see the section titled Risk Factors in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended on December 31, 2012. Fluctuation in the value of Chinese RMB relative to other currencies may have a material adverse effect on our business and/or an investment in our shares.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ( the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of September 30, 2013, the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were not operating effectively as of September 30, 2013. Our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of certain “material weaknesses” described in the “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” section in Item 9 of our annual report for fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. As of September 30, 2013, we had not completed the remediation of these material weaknesses.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls. Readers are cautioned that our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will necessarily prevent all fraud and material error. An internal control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any control design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Remediation Measures for Material Weaknesses