The following table sets forth our results of operations, expressed in thousands of dollars and as a percentage of revenue:
Revenue
Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2021 totaled $13.5 million, which was 6% less than the $14.3 million of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2020. Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2021 totaled $26.6 million, which was 17% less than the $32.0 million of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2020.
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
(in thousands) | | June 30, 2021 | | | June 30, 2020 | | | Change | | | June 30, 2021 | | | June 30, 2020 | | | Change | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | $ | | |
| % | | | | | | | | | $ | | |
| % | |
Performance | | $ | 6,862 | | | $ | 8,273 | | | | (1,411 | ) | | | (17 | )% | | $ | 13,943 | | | $ | 17,984 | | | | (4,041 | ) | | | (22 | )% |
NITC | | | 6,660 | | | | 6,067 | | | | 593 | | | | 10 | % | | | 12,683 | | | | 14,061 | | | | (1,378 | ) | | | (10 | )% |
Total revenue | | $ | 13,522 | | | $ | 14,340 | | | | (818 | ) | | | (6 | )% | | $ | 26,626 | | | $ | 32,045 | | | | (5,419 | ) | | | (17 | )% |
Performance Improvement Solutions revenue decreased by 17% from $8.3 million to $6.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease in revenue was primarily due to lower orders on the simulator part of the business, but offsetting with improvements in specialized engineering and consulting services. We recorded total Performance Improvement Solutions orders of $5.8 million and $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Performance Improvement Solutions revenue decreased by 22% from $18.0 million to $13.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease of revenue was primarily due to several significant SDB projects ended in the prior fiscal year and delays in commencing new contracts remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We recorded total Performance Improvement Solutions orders of $11.4 million and $12.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2021, Nuclear Industry Training and Consulting (workforce solutions) revenue increased by 10% to $6.7 million compared to revenue of $6.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020. The increase was primarily due to a large new customer contract which started in Q1 2021. We recorded total new orders of $5.0 million and $(0.3) million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively
For the six months ended June 30, 2021, Nuclear Industry Training and Consulting (workforce solutions) revenue decreased by 10% to $12.7 million compared to revenue of $14.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The decrease in revenue was primarily due to stoppage of existing projects and ending of some large projects resulting in a reduction in demand for staffing from our major customers. We recorded total new orders of $12.4 million and $14.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
As of June 30, 2021, our backlog was $37.5 million, of which, $27.7 million was attributed to the Performance segment and $9.8 million was attributed to the Nuclear Industry Training and Consulting (workforce solutions) segment. As of December 31, 2020, our backlog was $40.4 million with $30.3 million attributed to our Performance segment and $10.1 million to Nuclear Industry Training and Consulting (workforce solutions).
Gross Profit
Gross profit was $2.7 million or 19.9% of revenue and $3.6 million or 24.8% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 , respectively. Gross profit was $5.6 million or 21.1% of revenue and $7.7 million or 24.0% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(in thousands) | | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2021 | | | June 30, 2020 | | | June 30, 2021 | | | June 30, 2020 | |
| | $ | | |
| % | | | $ | | |
| % | | | $
| | |
| % | | | $
| | |
| % | |
Gross profit: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance Improvement Solutions | | $ | 1,760 | | | | 25.6 | % | | $ | 2,730 | | | | 33.0 | % | | $ | 3,952 | | | | 28.3 | % | | $ | 5,758 | | | | 32.0 | % |
Nuclear Industry Training and Consulting | | | 929 | | | | 13.9 | % | | | 832 | | | | 13.7 | % | | | 1,665 | | | | 13.1 | % | | | 1,919 | | | | 13.6 | % |
Total gross profit | | $ | 2,689 | | | | 19.9 | % | | $ | 3,562 | | | | 24.8 | % | | $ | 5,617 | | | | 21.1 | % | | $ | 7,677 | | | | 24.0 | % |
The Performance Improvement Solutions segment’s gross profit decreased by $970 thousand during three months ended June 30, 2021 over three months ended June 30, 2020. The Performance Improvement Solutions segment’s gross profit decreased by $1.8 million during six months ended June 30, 2021 over six months ended June 30, 2020. The decrease is primarily related to lower revenue, underutilization of staff and several significant SDB projects completed in the prior year that were not replaced with new orders.
The Nuclear Industry Training and Consulting (workforce solutions) segment’s gross profit increased by $97 thousand during three months ended June 30, 20201 over three months ended June 30, 2020. The Nuclear Industry Training and Consulting (workforce solutions) segment’s gross profit decreased by $254 thousand during six months ended June 30, 2021 over six months ended June 30, 2020. The decrease in gross profit was primarily driven by a decrease in revenue in the NITC business and new contracts undertaken at lower margins, partially offset by a reduction in direct costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”)
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses totaled $3.5 million and $4.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses totaled $7.3 million and $9.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Fluctuations in the components of SG&A spending were as follows.
| | Three months ended | | | Six Months ended | |
(in thousands) | | June 30, 2021 | | | June 30, 2020 | | | June 30, 2021 | | | June 30, 2020 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate charges | | $ | 2,632 | | | $ | 2,792 | | | $ | 5,390 | | | $ | 6,471 | |
Business development | | | 749 | | | | 810 | | | | 1,516 | | | | 1,746 | |
Facility operation & maintenance (O&M) | | | 268 | | | | 255 | | | | 468 | | | | 491 | |
Provision for loss on legal settlement | | | - | | | | 861 | | | | - | | | | 861 | |
Bad debt (recovery) expense | | | (137 | ) | | | - | | | | (133 | ) | | | 93 | |
Other | | | 10 | | | | 4 | | | | 15 | | | | 8 | |
Total | | $ | 3,522 | | | $ | 4,722 | | | $ | 7,256 | | | $ | 9,670 | |
Corporate charges
During the three months ended June 30, 2021, corporate charges decreased by $0.2 million over the same period of the prior year. During the six months ended June 30, 2021 corporate charges decreased by $1.1 million over the same period of the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction of external legal, audit and temporary worker’s fees of $0.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2021.
Business development expenses
Business development expense decreased $0.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2021 over the same period of the prior fiscal year. Business development expense decreased $0.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2021 over the same period of the prior fiscal year. The decrease was primarily due to lower commission costs and reduced headcount during the six months ended June 30, 2021.
Facility operation & maintenance (“O&M”)
Facility O&M expenses increased $13 thousand for three months ended June 30, 2021, compared to the same period in 2020. The increase was mainly due to a utility fee during the three months ended June 30, 2021. Facility O&M expenses decreased $23 thousand for six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to the same period in 2020. The decrease in facility O&M during fiscal 2021 was mainly due to lease terminations in the first half of 2020.
Bad debt (recovery) expense
We recorded $(133) thousand and $93 thousand of bad debt (recovery) expense during the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The bad debt recovery as of June 30, 2021 was driven by payment received for previously recorded bad debt.
Research and development
Research and development costs consist primarily of software engineering personnel and other related costs. Research and development costs, net of capitalized software, totaled $154 thousand and $179 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Research and development costs totaled $311 thousand and $389 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease was mainly due to lower headcount.
Restructuring
There was no restructuring cost recorded during three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020. During the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, we recorded restructuring charges of $808 thousand and $10 thousand, respectively. The increase was mainly due to final charges related to the liquidation of our Sweden operations during the period, pursuant to our foreign restructuring plan.
Loss on impairment of goodwill and definite-lived intangible assets
No impairment was recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021. We recognized a $4.3 million intangible asset impairment during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020.
Depreciation
We recorded depreciation expense of $71 thousand and $70 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Depreciation expense was $147 thousand and $178 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The reduction of $31 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2021 over the same period in 2020 was due primarily to assets becoming fully depreciated in 2021.
Amortization of intangible assets
Amortization expense related to definite-lived intangible assets totaled $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 and $0.6 million and $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease in amortization expense was primarily due to the reduction in the carrying value of DP Engineering’s intangible assets due to the $4.3 million impairment in Q1 2020.
Interest expense, net
Interest expense totaled $49 thousand and $187 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Interest expense totaled $103 thousand and $428 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease for the three and six month periods was due to a reduction in total indebtedness compared to six months ended June 30, 2020.
Other income, net
For the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, we recognized other income, net of $4.6 million and $24 thousand, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, we recognized other income, net of $4.6 million and $53 thousand, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the recording of $5.1 million Employee Retention Credit during the period offset by a VAT write-off of $0.5 million, We paid a VAT taxes for subcontractor equipment purchase and had pursued the collection of this VAT refund for a couple of years. In May of 2021, we were informed by our tax advisor that this VAT refund was no longer collectable.
Income taxes benefit
Income tax expense (benefit) for interim periods is determined using an estimate of our annual effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items arising in that quarter. Total income tax benefit of $4 thousand and tax expense of $180 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, were comprised mainly of foreign tax benefit or expense and state tax expense. Total income tax (benefit) expense of $(39) thousand and tax expense of $50 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, were comprised mainly of foreign tax benefit or expense and state tax expense.
Our income effective tax rate was (0.1)% and (4.0)% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, the difference between our income tax benefit at an effective tax rate of (0.1)% and (4.0)% respectively, and the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate of 21% was primarily due to accruals related to uncertain tax positions for certain foreign tax contingencies, a change in tax valuation allowance in our U.S. entity, and discrete item adjustments for U.S. and foreign taxes.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In preparing our consolidated financial statements, Management makes several estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Our most significant estimates relate to revenue recognition on contracts with customers, product warranties, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets acquired, valuation of long-lived assets to be disposed, valuation of stock-based compensation awards and the recoverability of deferred tax assets. These critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on April 13, 2021. For all accounting policies described in this document, management cautions that future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted and even our best estimates may require adjustment as facts and circumstances change.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2021, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $3.8 million, compared to $6.7 million as of December 31, 2020.
For the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, net cash used in operating activities was $1.1 million and net cash provided by operating activities was $2.0 million, respectively. The decrease of $3.1 million in cash flows used in operating activities was primarily driven by lower than expected orders resulting in less billing in the first half of 2021 and increased collections due to large milestone payments of large projects in the prior year.
.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $0.5 million and $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in the cash outflow for investing activities year over year was primarily driven by the increase of capital expenditures during the six months ended June 30, 2021.
For the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, net cash used in financing activities was $1.3 million and net cash provided by financing activities was $4.8 million, respectively. The decrease in cash used in financing activities of $6.0 million was driven by a repayment on term loans of $8.6 million offset by a draw on the line of credit of $3.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2020.
Paycheck Protection Program Loan (“PPP Loan”)
We entered into the PPP Loan agreement with the Bank, which was approved and funded on April 23, 2020, pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The PPP Loan matures on April 23, 2022, and bears interest at a rate of 1.0% per annum. Monthly amortized principal and interest payments were automatically deferred for ten months after the last day of our covered period, or through August 9, 2021, principal and interest payments would have been due for any portion of the loan balance that was not forgiven.
The PPP Loan contains events of default and other provisions customary for a loan of this type, including: (1) the use of PPP Loan amount shall be limited to certain qualifying expenses, (2) 100% of the principal amount of the loan is guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and (3) an amount up to the full principal amount may qualify for loan forgiveness in accordance with the terms of CARES Act. We have accumulated forgivable expenses beyond our loan amount and provided all prescribed support with our application for forgiveness with our Bank. Our Bank has reviewed our application for forgiveness and associated documentation and forwarded it on February 26, 2021 to the SBA with their determination that the loan is fully forgivable.
As of June 30, 2021, we classified $10.1 million of the PPP loan as current in our consolidated balance sheets. We recorded $50 thousand of interest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2021.
On August 5, 2021, the Company received approval from Small Business Administration (“SBA”) that the PPP loan including all accrued interest thereon was forgiven. The forgiveness of the PPP Loan will be recognized during the Company’s third fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2021. (See Note 17).
Credit Facilities
On December 29, 2016, we entered into a 3-year $5.0 million revolving line of credit facility (“RLOC”) with the Bank to fund general working capital needs and provide funding for acquisitions. The credit facility agreement was subject to certain financial covenants and reporting requirements. The Bank amended the agreement with us several times for acquisition lending and covenant violations.
On March 29, 2021, due to a projected violation of Q1 2021 leverage ratio, we signed the Ninth Amendment and Reaffirmation Agreement dated March 29, 2021 (the “Ninth Amendment”), with the Bank to waive the fixed charge coverage ratio and leverage ratio for the quarters ending March 31 and June 30, 2021, and we agreed, for each quarter thereafter, that the fixed charge coverage ratio would not be less than 1.10 to 1.00. In addition, we agreed to not exceed a maximum leverage ratio (starting on September 30, 2021) as follows: (i) 3.25 to 1.00 for the period ending September 30, 2021; (ii) 3.00 to 1.00 for the period ending on December 31, 2021, (iii) 2.75 to 1.00 for the period ending March 31, 2022; (iv) 2.50 to 1.00 for the period ending June 30, 2022 and (iv) 2.00 to 1.00 for the periods ending September 30, 2022 and each December 31st, March 31st, June 30th and September 30th thereafter. We are also required to maintain a minimum of $2.5 million in aggregate USA liquidity pursuant to the Ninth Amendment. As part of the amendment, we agreed, at closing, (i) to make a $0.5 million pay down of RLOC; (ii) RLOC commitment to be reduced to $4.25 million; and (iii) $0.5 million of RLOC will only be available for issuance of Letters of Credit. We also agreed to pay $0.5 million to reduce RLOC to $3.75 million by June 30, 2021 and to $3.5 million by September 30, 2021. Commencing December 31, 2021 and on the last day of each quarter, we will pay $75 thousand to reduce the RLOC. We incurred $25 thousand of amendment fees related to this amendment during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Reductions in orders and other negative changes to orders experienced at the beginning of the pandemic have started to reverse in 2021, but not at the level expected as ongoing COVID concerns continue to hinder the pace of recovery. This deterioration in the recovery plan has resulted in breaching the Minimum Liquidity ratio subsequent to June 30, 2021 and are projected to breach the Leverage and Fixed Charges ratio as of Q3 2021.
The PPP Loan does not factor into the expenses or liabilities used in the calculation of our debt covenants, unless we determine that more than $1 million of the original PPP Loan balance will not be forgiven. The Bank agreed to remove its collateral agreement with the Company’s subsidiaries as part of the repayment of our outstanding term loans during the year ended December 31, 2020.
During the six months ended June 30, 2021, we paid down $1.5 million and had a draw of $0.8 million on our RLOC. As of June 30, 2021, we had outstanding borrowings of $2.3 million under the RLOC and three letters of credit totaling $933 thousand outstanding to certain of our customers. The total borrowing capacity under RLOC was $3.8 million as of June 30, 2021. After consideration of letters of credit and the $0.5 million reserved for issuance of new letters of credit, there was no amount available for borrowing under the RLOC.
We intend to continue using the RLOC for short-term working capital needs when capacity is available and the issuance of letters of credit in connection with business operations provided, we remain in compliance with our covenants. As discussed in Note 10, we entered into a 9th Amendment on our credit facility, as such our covenants have been waived through June 30, 2021. Letter of credit issuance fees range between 1.25% and 2.00% of the value of the letter of credit, depending on our overall leverage ratio. We pay an unused RLOC fee quarterly based on the average daily unused balance.
Going Concern Consideration
In 2020 we had several projects (primarily in our NITC business segment) delayed and new orders postponed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. We amended our credit facility with Citizens Bank, N.A. (“the Bank”) in 2020 based upon expected covenant violations and have been required to curtail term debt in exchange for revised financial covenants. Scheduled term loan repayments and agreed upon curtailment required us to use $18.5 million in available cash to pay-off our term debt in 2020. We signed a Ninth Amendment and Reaffirmation Agreement (the “Ninth Amendment”) with the Bank on March 29, 2021 to waive the fixed charge coverage ratio and leverage ratio for the quarters ending March 31 and June 30, 2021, and to adjust the thresholds for future covenants to ease the risk of non-compliance experienced in previous quarters (See Note 10). Our working capital position on June 30, 2021 was a deficit of $5.0 million. This working capital deficit was primarily due to the $10.1 million of current maturities on our PPP loan at June 30, 2021. On August 5, 2021, the Company received approval from Small Business Administration (“SBA”) that the PPP loan including all accrued interest thereon was forgiven. (See Note 17)
COVID-19 macroeconomic environment is considered fluid and although recovery is anticipated to steadily occur over the next 12 months, a further decline will stress our ability to meet covenant requirements. Further continuance of delays in commencing work on outstanding orders or a continued loss of orders, and further disruption of our business because of worker illness or mandated shutdowns may also exacerbate the situation. Jurisdictions where our businesses operate across the country are pushing toward re-opening places of business and government support, through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, will continue to support the broader economy. However, the timing of these elements taking place are not predictable and may not serve to mitigate our situation or improve our specific company’s health. Following the Ninth Amendment, our new covenant compliance remains dependent on meeting future projections, which are subject to the variability and unknown speed and extent of post-COVID-19 recovery.
Reductions in orders and other negative changes to orders experienced at the beginning of the pandemic have started reverse in 2021, but not at the level expected as ongoing COVID concerns continue to hinder the pace of recovery. This deterioration in the recovery plan has resulted in breaching the Minimum Liquidity ratio subsequent to June 30, 2021 and projected breaching the Leverage and Fixed Charges ratio covenant.
The Company’s management continues to explore raising capital through its access to the public markets or entering into alternative finance arrangements. Continued negative trends in operating results could be mitigated through various cost cutting measures including adjustments to headcount or compensation, vendor augmentation or delay of investment initiatives in the Company’s corporate office.
These actions, which are further supported by positively trending macroeconomic conditions, and the potential to see recovering business and orders may ease the risk of further bank covenant violations. However, when considering the unpredictability of the above, there continues to be substantial doubt the Company will continue as a going concern.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted EBITDA
References to “EBITDA” mean net (loss) income, before considering interest expense (income), provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization. References to Adjusted EBITDA excludes provision for legal settlement, loss on impairment, impact of the change in fair value of contingent consideration, restructuring charges, stock-based compensation expense, impact of the change in fair value of derivative instruments, acquisition-related expense and VAT write-off. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Management believes EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, in addition to operating profit, net income and other GAAP measures, are useful to investors to evaluate the Company’s results because it excludes certain items that are not directly related to the Company’s core operating performance that may, or could, have a disproportionate positive or negative impact on our results for any particular period. Investors should recognize that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA might not be comparable to similarly-titled measures of other companies. This measure should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, any measure of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of non-GAAP EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measure in accordance with SEC Regulation G follows:
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2021 | | | June 30, 2020 | | | June 30, 2021 | | | June 30, 2020 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 3,231 | | | $ | (2,149 | ) | | $ | 1,026 | | | $ | (8,407 | ) |
Interest expense, net | | | 49 | | | | 187 | | | | 103 | | | | 428 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | (4 | ) | | | 180 | | | | (39 | ) | | | 50 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 481 | | | | 598 | | | | 994 | | | | 1,451 | |
EBITDA | | | 3,757 | | | | (1,184 | ) | | | 2,084 | | | | (6,478 | ) |
Provision for legal settlement | | | - | | | | 861 | | | | - | | | | 861 | |
Loss on impairment | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,302 | |
Employee retention credit | | | (5,075 | ) | | | - | | | | (5,075 | ) | | | - | |
Restructuring charges | | | - | | | | - | | | | 808 | | | | 10 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 463 | | | | 177 | | | | 501 | | | | 324 | |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments | | | - | | | | (47 | ) | | | - | | | | (4 | ) |
Acquisition-related expense | | | - | | | | 7 | | | | - | | | | 188 | |
VAT write-off | | | 450 | | | | - | | | | 450 | | | | - | |
Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | (405 | ) | | $ | (186 | ) | | $ | (1,232 | ) | | $ | (797 | ) |
Adjusted Net (Loss) Income and Adjusted (Loss) Earnings per Share Reconciliation
References to Adjusted Net (Loss) Income excludes the impact of provision for legal settlement, loss on impairment, impact of the change in fair value of contingent consideration, restructuring charges, stock-based compensation expense, impact of the change in fair value of derivative instruments, acquisition-related expenses and amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions, and VAT write-off. Adjusted Net (Loss) Income and Adjusted (Loss) Earnings per Share (adjusted EPS) are not measures of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Management believes adjusted net (loss) income and adjusted (loss) earnings per share, in addition to other GAAP measures, are useful to investors to evaluate the Company’s results because they exclude certain items that are not directly related to the Company’s core operating performance and non-cash items that may, or could, have a disproportionate positive or negative impact on our results for any particular period, such as stock-based compensation expense. These measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, any measure of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of non-GAAP adjusted net (loss) income and adjusted (loss) earnings per share to GAAP net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, is as follows:
(in thousands) | | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2021 | | | June 30, 2020 | | | June 30, 2021 | | | June 30, 2020 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 3,231 | | | $ | (2,149 | ) | | $ | 1,026 | | | $ | (8,407 | ) |
Provision for legal settlement | | | - | | | | 861 | | | | - | | | | 861 | |
Loss on impairment | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,302 | |
Employee retention credit | | | (5,075 | ) | | | - | | | | (5,075 | ) | | | - | |
Restructuring charges | | | - | | | | - | | | | 808 | | | | 10 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 463 | | | | 177 | | | | 501 | | | | 324 | |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments | | | - | | | | (47 | ) | | | - | | | | (4 | ) |
Acquisition-related expense | | | - | | | | 7 | | | | - | | | | 188 | |
VAT write-off | | | 450 | | | | - | | | | 450 | | | | - | |
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions | | | 303 | | | | 444 | | | | 643 | | | | 1,114 | |
Adjusted net loss | | $ | (628 | ) | | $ | (707 | ) | | $ | (1,647 | ) | | $ | (1,612 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted net loss per common share – diluted | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.08 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute adjusted net loss per share - diluted(1) | | | 20,647,426 | | | | 20,407,958 | | | | 20,638,116 | | | | 20,375,446 | |
(1) During the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, we reported a GAAP net income and an adjusted net loss. Accordingly there were 54,577 of dilutive shares that were excluded in the adjusted net loss per share calculation that were included when calculating the diluted net income per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2021.
(1) During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, we reported a GAAP net loss and an adjusted net loss. Accordingly, there were 74,732 and 56,373 dilutive shares from RSUs that were excluded from the adjusted net loss calculation during fiscal 2020.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk |
Not required of a smaller reporting company.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report and our annual report, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective; we are currently in remediation of our internal controls to address material weaknesses identified in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Through Management’s evaluation of controls as of December 31, 2020, it was determined that a material weakness existed and related to management’s review of reconciliations over unbilled receivables and billings in excess of revenue earned. Our remediation of this material weakness was initiated by hiring additional skilled personnel to prepare and review reconciliations over unbilled receivables and billings in excess of revenue earned.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitation of Effectiveness of Controls
Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
The Company and its subsidiaries are from time to time involved in ordinary routine litigation incidental to the conduct of its business. The Company and its subsidiaries are not a party to, and its property is not the subject of, any material pending legal proceedings that, in the opinion of management, are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
On March 29, 2019, a former employee of Absolute Consulting, Inc., filed a putative class action against Absolute and the Company, Joyce v. Absolute Consulting Inc., case number 1:19 cv 00868 RDB, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuit alleges that plaintiff was not properly compensated for overtime hours that he worked. In addition, he alleges that there is a class of employees who were not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. Following a mediation session on July 14, 2020, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release on August 17, 2020, providing that the case would be settled and dismissed in exchange for Absolute’s payment of a gross settlement amount not to exceed $1.5 million. The court approved the settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice on September 8, 2020. After the passing of an opt-in notice period expired, the final cost of settling this case, including plaintiff’s attorney fees was approximately $1.4 million.
.
The Company is involved in litigation in the ordinary course of business. While it is too early to determine the outcome of such matters, management does not expect the resolution of these matters to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
The following additional risk factors should be read in conjunction with the risk factors set forth under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2020 Form 10-K. Except as described herein, there have been no material changes with respect to the risk factors disclosed in our 2020 Form 10-K.
Substantial doubt has been raised in our ability to continue as going concern as a result of the economic slowdown caused the global COVID 19 pandemic and continued deterioration of business could have an adverse effect.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, and current and potential stockholders may lose confidence in our financial reporting.
We are required by the SEC to establish and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting that provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We are likewise required, on a quarterly basis, to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and to disclose any changes and material weaknesses in those internal controls.
Based on management’s assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 30, 2021 or at December 31, 2020 due to the existence of a material weaknesses in internal control over management’s review of reconciliations over unbilled receivables and billings in excess of revenue earned. Our remediation of these control weakness was actioned by hiring additional skilled personnel to prepare and review reconciliations over unbilled receivables and billings in excess of revenue earned.
Although we believe that these efforts have strengthened our internal control over financial reporting and address the concern that gave rise to the material weakness as of December 31, 2020, we cannot be certain that our expanded knowledge and revised internal control procedures will ensure that we maintain adequate internal control over our financial reporting in future periods. Any failure to maintain such internal controls could adversely impact our ability to report our financial results on a timely and accurate basis. If our financial statements are not accurate, investors may not have a complete understanding of our operations. Likewise, if our financial statements are not filed on a timely basis as required by the SEC and The NASDAQ Capital Market (Nasdaq), we could confront an enforcement action from the SEC and/or delisting from Nasdaq. In either case, such an event could have a material adverse effect on our business. Finally, inferior internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.
A disruption, failure or breach of our networks or systems, including cyber-attacks, could harm our business.
Global cyber security threats can range from uncoordinated individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to our information technology (IT) systems to sophisticated and targeted measures known as advanced persistent threats. While we employ comprehensive measures to prevent, detect, address and mitigate these threats (including access controls, data encryption, vulnerability assessments, continuous monitoring of our IT networks and systems, and maintenance of backup and protective systems), cyber security incidents, depending on their nature and scope, could potentially result in the misappropriation, destruction, corruption or unavailability of critical data and confidential or proprietary information (our own or that of third parties) and the disruption of business operations. The potential consequences of a material cyber security incident include reputational damage, litigation with third parties, civil or regulatory liability for loss of sensitive or protected information such as personal data, incident response costs, diminution in the value of our investment in research, development and engineering, loss of intellectual property, and increased cyber security protection and remediation costs, which in turn could adversely affect our competitiveness and results of operations.
Our beliefs regarding our ability to contribute to global decarbonization may be based on materially inaccurate assumptions
An objective has been to create a leading business focused on decarbonizing the power industries by providing a diverse set of highly unique and essential services and technologies, primarily to serve the nuclear power industry, which we believe will be essential to decarbonization. While we believe that nuclear power will meaningfully contribute to decarbonization, these beliefs are based on certain assumptions, including, but not limited to, the immediate impact of global warming and the inability to meaningfully address global warming without maximizing nuclear power and other alternative energy sources. To the extent our assumptions are materially incorrect or incomplete, it could adversely impact our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results due to a reduction in demand for our services.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures |
Not applicable.
None.
| | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
| | |
| | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
| | |
| | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
| | |
| 101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document |
| | |
| 101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
| | |
| 101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
| | |
| 101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
| | |
| 101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
| | |
| 101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 16, 2021 | |
| GSE SYSTEMS, INC. |
| |
| /S/ KYLE J. LOUDERMILK |
| Kyle J. Loudermilk |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |
| |
| /S/ EMMETT A. PEPE |
| Emmett A. Pepe |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
43