U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the quarterly period ended October 1, 2005
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-14556
POORE BROTHERS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware | | 86-0786101 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or | | (I.R.S. Employer |
Organization) | | Identification No.) |
| | |
3500 S. La Cometa Drive, Goodyear, Arizona | | 85338 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (623) 932-6200
Indicate by check whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 19,872,081 as of October 1, 2005.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
POORE BROTHERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
| | October 1, | | December 25, | |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 11,046,999 | | $ | 9,675,490 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $166,000 in 2005 and $89,000 in 2004 | | 5,971,821 | | 5,379,362 | |
Inventories | | 2,971,667 | | 2,145,742 | |
Deferred income tax asset | | 1,082,156 | | 1,341,723 | |
Other current assets | | 485,997 | | 471,051 | |
Total current assets | | 21,558,640 | | 19,013,368 | |
| | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | | 10,271,553 | | 10,815,963 | |
Goodwill | | 5,986,252 | | 5,986,252 | |
Trademarks | | 4,207,032 | | 4,207,032 | |
Other assets | | 90,295 | | 94,672 | |
| | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 42,113,772 | | $ | 40,117,287 | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 2,991,476 | | $ | 2,809,187 | |
Accrued liabilities | | 3,963,603 | | 2,656,887 | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | 734,461 | | 1,390,667 | |
Current portion of costs related to brand discontinuance and other current liabilities | | 176,449 | | 442,533 | |
Total current liabilities | | 7,865,989 | | 7,299,274 | |
| | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current portion | | 1,693,763 | | 1,729,134 | |
Non-current portion of accrued costs related to brand discontinuance and other liabilities | | 176,266 | | 492,541 | |
Deferred income tax liability | | 1,788,252 | | 1,788,252 | |
Total liabilities | | 11,524,270 | | 11,309,201 | |
| | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $100 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at October 1, 2005 and December 25, 2004 | | — | | — | |
Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 19,872,081 and 19,647,561 shares issued and outstanding at October 1, 2005 and December 25, 2004, respectively | | 198,721 | | 196,476 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 27,707,093 | | 27,274,825 | |
Retained earnings | | 2,683,688 | | 1,336,785 | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | 30,589,502 | | 28,808,086 | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 42,113,772 | | $ | 40,117,287 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
POORE BROTHERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(unaudited)
| | Quarter Ended | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | October 1, | | September 25, | | October 1, | | September 25, | |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2004 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net revenues | | $ | 18,625,985 | | $ | 17,176,201 | | $ | 58,316,381 | | $ | 52,335,763 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenues | | 16,095,991 | | 12,871,232 | | 46,528,681 | | 40,348,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gain on sale of equipment | | (194,359 | ) | — | | (194,359 | ) | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Costs related to brand discontinuance | | — | | — | | — | | 1,414,759 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | 2,724,353 | | 4,304,969 | | 11,982,059 | | 10,572,204 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 3,233,188 | | 2,695,000 | | 9,875,876 | | 7,993,475 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | (508,835 | ) | 1,609,969 | | 2,106,183 | | 2,578,729 | |
Interest income (expense), net | | 68,998 | | (49,758 | ) | 94,728 | | (145,704 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income tax benefit (provision) | | (439,837 | ) | 1,560,211 | | 2,200,911 | | 2,433,025 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income tax benefit (provision) | | 171,302 | | (604,000 | ) | (854,008 | ) | (942,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (268,535 | ) | $ | 956,211 | | $ | 1,346,903 | | $ | 1,491,025 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | 0.07 | | $ | 0.08 | |
Diluted | | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | 0.07 | | $ | 0.08 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | 19,842,862 | | 18,831,954 | | 19,728,863 | | 18,685,191 | |
Diluted | | 19,842,862 | | 19,202,074 | | 20,018,528 | | 19,321,246 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
POORE BROTHERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | October 1, 2005 | | September 25, 2004 | |
Cash flows provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,346,903 | | $ | 1,491,025 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation | | 906,296 | | 1,030,631 | |
Amortization | | 4,377 | | 23,704 | |
Provision for bad debts | | 55,277 | | (56,073 | ) |
Other asset amortization | | — | | 44,066 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 259,567 | | 827,228 | |
Amortization of deferred compensation expense | | 4,851 | | — | |
Costs related to brand discontinuance | | — | | 1,758,919 | |
(Gain) loss on disposition of equipment | | (174,476 | ) | 16,571 | |
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options | | 175,928 | | — | |
Change in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | (647,736 | ) | 739,367 | |
Inventories | | (825,925 | ) | 265,561 | |
Other assets and liabilities | | (597,305 | ) | (21,088 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | 1,489,005 | | 140,988 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | 1,996,762 | | 6,260,899 | |
| | | | | |
Cash flows used in investing activities: | | | | | |
Purchase of equipment | | (386,819 | ) | (447,526 | ) |
Proceeds from disposition of equipment | | 280,050 | | — | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (106,769 | ) | (447,526 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows used in financing activities: | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | 253,734 | | 266,758 | |
Payments made on long-term debt | | (772,218 | ) | (718,778 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (518,484 | ) | (452,020 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net increase in cash | | 1,371,509 | | 5,361,353 | |
Cash at beginning of period | | 9,675,490 | | 3,239,570 | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | 11,046,999 | | $ | 8,600,923 | |
| | | | | |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for interest | | $ | 130,047 | | $ | 168,562 | |
Cash paid during the period for taxes | | 317,863 | | — | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
POORE BROTHERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Poore Brothers, Inc., (“the Company”) a Delaware corporation, was formed in 1995 as a holding company to acquire a potato chip manufacturing and distribution business which had been founded by Donald and James Poore in 1986.
In December 1996, the Company completed an initial public offering of its Common Stock. In November 1998, the Company acquired the business and certain assets (including the Bob’s Texas Style® potato chip brand) of Tejas Snacks, L.P. (“Tejas”), a Texas-based potato chip manufacturer. In October 1999, the Company acquired Wabash Foods, LLC (“Wabash”) including the Tato Skins®, O’Boisies®, and Pizzarias® trademarks, the Bluffton, Indiana manufacturing operation and assumed all of Wabash Foods’ liabilities. In June 2000, the Company acquired Boulder Natural Foods, Inc. (“Boulder”) and the Boulder Potato Company® brand of totally natural potato chips. As part of the Boulder acquisition, the Company was required to issue additional unregistered shares of Common Stock to the seller on each of the first three anniversaries of the closing of the acquisition. The issuance of such shares was dependent upon increases in sales of Boulder product as compared to previous periods. In 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company was required to issue 93,728 shares valued at $420,566, 88,864 shares valued at $210,786 and 57,898 shares valued at $185,274, respectively. With each issuance of shares the Company increased the goodwill recorded from this acquisition.
In October 2000, the Company launched its T.G.I. Friday’s® brand salted snacks pursuant to a license agreement with TGI Friday’s Inc., which expires in 2014.
In June 2003, the Company launched its Crunch Toons® brand potato snacks, initially featuring Looney Tunes™ characters pursuant to a multi-year license agreement with Warner Bros. Consumer Products. The Company decided to discontinue the brand in June 2004, and amended its license agreements with Warner Bros. Consumer Products.
In April 2005, the Company launched its Cinnabon® brand pursuant to a license agreement with Cinnabon, Inc, the initial term of which expires in 2011. A renewal term for an additional five years exists at the end of the initial term. The Company plans to develop and sell a variety of snack products, to include cookies, under the Cinnabon® brand.
In September 2005, the Company signed a licensing agreement with Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. for the development, manufacture and sale of snack food products under the Panda Express® brand name. The Company expects to begin shipping the Panda Express® snack products in 2006.
The Company is engaged in the development, production, marketing and distribution of innovative snack food products that are sold primarily through grocery retailers, mass merchandisers, club stores, convenience stores and vend distributors across the United States. The Company currently manufactures and sells nationally T.G.I. Friday’s® brand snacks under license from TGI Friday’s Inc. and sells nationally Cinnabon® brand snacks under license from Cinnabon, Inc. The Company also currently (i) manufactures and sells regionally its own brands of snack food products, including Poore Brothers®, Bob’s Texas Style®, and Boulder Canyon Natural FoodsTM brand batch-fried potato chips and Tato Skins® brand potato snacks, (ii) manufactures private label potato chips for grocery retail chains in the southwest, and (iii) distributes in Arizona snack food products that are manufactured by others. The Company sells its T.G.I. Friday’s® brand snack products to mass merchandisers, grocery, club and drug stores directly and to convenience stores and vend operators through independent distributors. The Company’s other brands are also sold through independent distributors.
6
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Poore Brothers, Inc. and all of its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany amounts and transactions have been eliminated. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary in order to make the condensed consolidated financial statements not misleading. A description of the Company’s accounting policies and other financial information is included in the audited financial statements filed with Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2004. The results of operations for the quarter and nine months ended October 1, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Exercises of outstanding stock options or warrants are assumed to occur for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share for periods in which their effect would not be anti-dilutive.
| | Quarter Ended | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | October 1, 2005 | | Sept. 25, 2004 | | October 1, 2005 | | Sept. 25, 2004 | |
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share: | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (268,535 | ) | $ | 956,211 | | $ | 1,346,903 | | $ | 1,491,025 | |
Weighted average number of common shares | | 19,842,862 | | 18,831,954 | | 19,728,863 | | 18,685,191 | |
Earnings (loss) per common share | | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | 0.07 | | $ | 0.08 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share: | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (268,535 | ) | $ | 956,211 | | $ | 1,346,903 | | $ | 1,491,025 | |
Weighted average number of common shares | | 19,842,862 | | 18,831,954 | | 19,728,863 | | 18,685,191 | |
Incremental shares from assumed conversions- | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants | | — | | 143,707 | | — | | 163,495 | |
Stock options | | — | | 226,413 | | 289,665 | | 472,560 | |
Adjusted weighted average number of common shares | | 19,842,862 | | 19,202,074 | | 20,018,528 | | 19,321,246 | |
Earnings (loss) per common share | | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | 0.07 | | $ | 0.08 | |
7
The Company’s stock-based compensation plan is accounted for under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure”. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for stock option grants. Awards under the plan vest over periods ranging from one to three years, depending on the type of award. The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share if the fair value method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period presented, using the Black-Scholes valuation model.
| | Quarter Ended | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | October 1, 2005 | | Sept. 25, 2004 | | October 1, 2005 | | Sept. 25, 2004 | |
Net income (loss) as reported | | $ | (268,535 | ) | $ | 956,211 | | $ | 1,346,903 | | $ | 1,491,025 | |
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects | | (51,733 | ) | (141,655 | ) | (172,982 | ) | (497,032 | ) |
Pro forma net income (loss) | | $ | (320,268 | ) | $ | 814,556 | | $ | 1,173,921 | | $ | 993,993 | |
| | Quarter Ended | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | October 1, 2005 | | Sept. 25, 2004 | | October 1, 2005 | | Sept. 25, 2004 | |
Net income (loss) per share – basic – as reported | | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | 0.07 | | $ | 0.08 | |
Pro forma net income (loss) per share – basic | | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.04 | | $ | 0.06 | | $ | 0.05 | |
Net income (loss) per share – diluted – as reported | | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | 0.07 | | $ | 0.08 | |
Pro forma net income (loss) per share – diluted | | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.04 | | $ | 0.06 | | $ | 0.05 | |
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted in 2004 and 2005: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 62%; risk-free interest rate of 3.15% and expected lives of 3 years. Under this method, the weighted-average fair value of the options granted was $0.90 in 2004 and $2.18 in 2005.
On August 1, 2005, the Company issued to its Senior Vice President of Marketing 35,353 shares of restricted stock under the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, subject to vesting in equal annual installments over three years. The restricted stock was valued at the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, and the resulting deferred compensation expense of $175,000 was included in additional paid-in capital and is being amortized over the vesting period. During the period ended October 1, 2005, amortization expense of $4,851 related to this grant is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
8
New Accounting Pronouncements
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” requiring all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements based on their fair values. This standard is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2005 and includes two transition methods. Upon adoption, we will be required to use either the modified prospective or the modified retrospective transition method. Under the modified prospective method, awards that are granted, modified, or settled after the date of adoption should be measured and accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123R. Unvested equity-classified awards that were granted prior to the effective date should continue to be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123 except that amounts must be recognized in the income statement. Under the modified retrospective approach, the previously-reported amounts are restated (either to the beginning of the year of adoption or for all periods presented) to reflect the SFAS 123 amounts in the income statement. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard and its transitional alternatives.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs”. This statement clarifies the accounting for the abnormal amount of idle facilities expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material. This statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period expense. In addition, the statement requires that allocation of fixed overhead to the cost of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. This statement is effective for inventory costs incurred after December 31, 2005. Adoption of this statement will not have a material effect on the financial statements of the Company.
2. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
| | October 1, 2005 | | December 25, 2004 | |
Finished goods | | $ | 2,159,401 | | $ | 1,537,488 | |
Raw materials | | 812,266 | | 608,254 | |
| | $ | 2,971,667 | | $ | 2,145,742 | |
3. Long-Term Debt
The Company’s Goodyear, Arizona manufacturing, distribution and headquarters facility is subject to a $1.8 million mortgage loan from Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, which bears interest at 9.03% per annum and is secured by the building and the land on which it is located. The loan matures on July 1, 2012; however, monthly principal and interest installments of $16,825 are determined on a twenty-year amortization period.
On August 19, 2005, the Company refinanced its U.S. Bancorp Credit Agreement into a new $5.0 million Line of Credit and a $756,603 Term Loan (collectively, the “New Credit Agreement”) with the same bank. The original credit facility consisted of: (i) a $5.0 million line of credit with a borrowing limit calculated based on specified percentages of eligible receivables and inventories; (ii) a $0.5 million capital expenditures line of credit; and (iii) a $5.8 million term loan with a remaining balance of $756,603 at the time of the refinancing.
The Line of Credit bears interest at the prime rate less 0.5% (6.25% at October 1, 2005) and matures on June 30, 2007. Interest is due monthly, with the outstanding principal balance due in full at the maturity date. The Term Loan bears interest at the prime rate (6.75% at October 1, 2005) and matures on July 1, 2006. Monthly principal payments of $68,782 plus interest are due under the Term Loan. At October 1, 2005, there was no outstanding balance on the Line of Credit and $688,000 outstanding on the Term Loan.
9
The New Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all assets of the Company. The Company’s obligations under the New Credit Agreement are guaranteed by each of its subsidiaries. The agreement requires the Company to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants, including a minimum tangible net worth, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a minimum current ratio. At October 1, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all covenants of the New Credit Agreement.
4. Brand Discontinuance
On June 11, 2004, the Company discontinued its Crunch Toons® brand. The Company negotiated amendments to its license agreements with Warner Bros. Consumer Products pursuant to which the Agreements will remain in effect but become non-exclusive. However, because the Company ceased using the Crunch Toons® brand in accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”, the Company recorded a liability for the estimated fair value of the remaining guaranteed future minimum payments under the agreements by computing the present value of the future cash payments. Also in 2004, the Company concluded that a leased packaging machine, primarily associated with Crunch Toons®, was no longer likely to be used.
The following table summarizes the activity of the accrued costs related to the brand discontinuance and other liabilities for the quarter ended October 1, 2005:
Description: | | June 25, 2005 Balance | | Activity | | October 1, 2005 Balance | | | |
Present value of guaranteed minimum royalty payments | | $ | 427,438 | | $ | (74,723 | ) | $ | 352,715 | | (1),(2) | |
Reclamation costs | | 35,594 | | (35,594 | ) | — | | (1) | |
Present value of remaining lease payments on equipment | | 234,359 | | (234,359 | ) | — | | (1),(3) | |
Total | | $ | 697,391 | | $ | (344,676 | ) | $ | 352,715 | | | |
The following table summarizes the activity of the accrued costs related to the brand discontinuance and other liabilities for the nine months ended October 1, 2005:
Description: | | Dec. 25, 2004 Balance | | Activity | | October 1, 2005 Balance | | | |
Present value of guaranteed minimum royalty payments | | $ | 592,472 | | $ | (239,757 | ) | $ | 352,715 | | (1),(2) | |
Reclamation costs | | 34,498 | | (34,498 | ) | — | | (1) | |
Present value of remaining lease payments on equipment. | | 308,104 | | (308,104 | ) | — | | (1),(3) | |
Total | | $ | 935,074 | | $ | (582,359 | ) | $ | 352,715 | | | |
(1) These amounts are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Current and Non-current portions of accrued costs related to brand discontinuance and other liabilities.”
(2) In accordance with SFAS No. 146, interest accretion was recorded for the period and future royalty payments will be made in accordance with the amended agreements.
(3) In accordance with SFAS No. 146, the fair value of remaining operating lease payments was recorded relating to a machine the Company determined would no longer be used. This machine lease was completely paid off in July 2005.
10
5. Litigation
The Company is periodically a party to various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes, based on discussions with legal counsel, that the resolution of any such lawsuits will not have a material effect on the financial statements taken as a whole.
6. Business Segments
The Company’s operations consist of two segments: manufactured products and distributed products. The manufactured products segment produces potato chips, potato crisps and potato skins, for sale primarily to snack food distributors and retailers. The distributed products segment sells snack food products manufactured by other companies to the Company’s Arizona snack food distributors. The Company’s reportable segments offer different products and services. All of the Company’s revenues are attributable to external customers in the United States and Canada, and all of its assets are located in the United States.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 1 to the audited financial statements filed with the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2004. The Company does not allocate assets, selling, general and administrative expenses, income taxes or other income and expense to segments.
| | Manufactured Products | | Distributed Products | | Consolidated | |
Quarter ended October 1, 2005 | | | | | | | |
Net revenues from external customers | | $ | 17,716,891 | | $ | 909,094 | | $ | 18,625,985 | |
Depreciation and amortization in segment gross profit | | 208,229 | | — | | 208,229 | |
Gain on sale of equipment | | 194,359 | | — | | 194,359 | |
Segment gross profit | | 2,571,843 | | 152,510 | | 2,724,353 | |
| | | | | | | |
Quarter ended September 25, 2004 | | | | | | | |
Net revenues from external customers | | $ | 16,667,270 | | $ | 508,931 | | $ | 17,176,201 | |
Depreciation and amortization in segment gross profit | | 247,797 | | — | | 247,797 | |
Segment gross profit | | 4,237,710 | | 67,259 | | 4,304,969 | |
| | | | | | | |
Nine months ended October 1, 2005 | | | | | | | |
Net revenues from external customers | | $ | 55,833,936 | | $ | 2,482,445 | | $ | 58,316,381 | |
Depreciation and amortization in segment gross profit | | 631,441 | | — | | 631,441 | |
Gain on sale of equipment | | 194,359 | | — | | 194,359 | |
Segment gross profit | | 11,604,268 | | 377,791 | | 11,982,059 | |
| | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 25, 2004 | | | | | | | |
Net revenues from external customers | | $ | 50,722,411 | | $ | 1,613,352 | | $ | 52,335,763 | |
Depreciation and amortization in segment gross profit | | 777,207 | | — | | 777,207 | |
Costs related to brand discontinuance | | 1,414,759 | | — | | 1,414,759 | |
Segment gross profit | | 10,330,460 | | 241,744 | | 10,572,204 | |
11
The following table reconciles reportable segment gross profit to the Company’s consolidated income before income tax provision.
| | Quarter Ended | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | October 1, 2005 | | Sept. 25, 2004 | | October 1, 2005 | | Sept. 25, 2004 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated segment gross profit | | $ | 2,724,353 | | $ | 4,304,969 | | $ | 11,982,059 | | $ | 10,572,204 | |
Unallocated amounts: | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | (3,233,188 | ) | (2,695,000 | ) | (9,875,876 | ) | (7,993,475 | ) |
Interest income (expense), net | | 68,998 | | (49,758 | ) | 94,728 | | (145,704 | ) |
Income (loss) before income tax provision | | $ | (439,837 | ) | $ | 1,560,211 | | $ | 2,200,911 | | $ | 2,433,025 | |
7. Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using a balance sheet approach whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences in financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities. The differences are measured using the income tax rate in effect during the year of measurement.
The Company experienced significant net losses in prior fiscal years resulting in a net operating loss carryforward (“NOL”) for federal income tax purposes of approximately $1.9 million at December 25, 2004. The Company’s NOL will begin to expire in varying amounts between 2010 and 2018.
Generally accepted accounting principles require that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the tax provision in the period of change. In determining whether a valuation allowance is required, the Company takes into account all positive and negative evidence with regard to the utilization of a deferred tax asset including our past earnings history, expected future earnings, the character and jurisdiction of such earnings, unsettled circumstances that, if unfavorably resolved, would adversely affect utilization of a deferred tax asset, carryback and carryforward periods, and tax strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax asset. The Company provides for income taxes at a rate equal to the combined federal and state effective rates, which approximate 39% under current tax rates.
8. Subsequent Event
On October 27, 2005, the Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent to acquire certain assets and liabilities of Shadewell Grove Foods, Inc., and Shadewell Grove IP, LLC. The letter of intent is for the purchase of agreed upon assets and liabilities, including licenses to produce and sell Mrs. Fields® brand ready-to-eat cookies, baking chips, brownies and toppings through grocery, drug, club, mass merchandiser and convenience store channels and certain tangible assets consisting principally of inventory and accounts receivable and minimal fixed assets. The purchase price consists of $3 million at closing and a note for $22 million. The principal amount of the note is subject to reduction to the extent the acquired business’ gross revenue levels in 2005 are less than $44 million and working capital at the closing date is less than $2 million. The Company’s obligation to pay the note is entirely contingent on a satisfactory resolution of pending legal matters relating to the Mrs. Fields® licenses, which could come after closing. Completion of the acquisition is subject to the signing of a definitive purchase agreement, completion of the financing for the transaction and fulfillment of other closing conditions to be contained in the definitive purchase agreement.
12
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including all documents incorporated by reference, includes “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and Poore Brothers, Inc. (the “Company”) desires to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions thereof. Therefore, the Company is including this statement for the express purpose of availing itself of the protections of the safe harbor with respect to all of such forward-looking statements. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “will likely result,” “will continue,” “future” and similar terms and expressions identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events, trends and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including specifically the possibility that the Company will need additional financing due to future operating losses or in order to implement the Company’s business strategy, the possible diversion of management resources from the day-to-day operations of the Company as a result of strategic acquisitions, potential difficulties resulting from the integration of acquired businesses with the Company’s business, other acquisition-related risks, lack of consumer acceptance of existing and future products, dependence upon key license agreements, dependence upon major customers, significant competition, risks related to the food products industry, volatility of the market price of the Company’s common stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), the possible de-listing of the Common Stock from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market if the Company fails to satisfy the applicable listing criteria (including a minimum share price) in the future and those other risks and uncertainties discussed herein and in the Company’s other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking information contained in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q will in fact transpire or prove to be accurate. Readers are cautioned to consider the specific risk factors described herein and under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2004, and not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained herein, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date hereof. All subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this section.
Results of Operations
Quarter ended October 1, 2005 compared to the quarter ended September 25, 2004.
Net revenues in the third quarter of 2005 were $18.6 million, an increase of 8.4% compared to third quarter 2004 net revenues of $17.2 million. Gross revenue shipments, before deductions for trade spending, grew 24% in this year’s third quarter versus the third quarter of 2004. The reason for net revenue growing much less than gross revenue was $2.5 million of additional trade spending programs initiated to aggressively grow revenue in T.G.I. Friday’s®, Boulder Canyon Natural Foods™ and Cinnabon® brands, which did not generate sufficient sales volume to offset costs.
T.G.I Friday’s® brand salted snacks net revenue grew 1% to $12.4 million in the third quarter of 2005 as the higher trade spending programs in grocery, convenience store and mass merchandiser channels offset the 12% gross revenue growth. Overall, the T.G.I. Friday’s® brand represented 67% of total net revenue in the third quarter of 2005. The Cinnabon® brand cookie market test continued in the third quarter of 2005 and generated $1.2 million in gross revenue from a variety of new customers in the grocery and convenience store channels. An overestimate of sell through consumption in connection with the large initial promotional order from a mass merchandiser resulted in a charge of $0.7 million during the third quarter of 2005 to mark-down and dispose of estimated excess Cinnabon® inventory. The Company’s potato chip brands’ net revenues grew 19% due to strong promotional activity, particularly on the Boulder Canyon Natural Foods™ brand. Distributed products net revenue also grew 73% over the prior year due to increased product lines.
13
Gross profit was $2.7 million, or 14.6% of net revenue, compared to $4.3 million, or 25.1% of net revenue, in the same quarter of 2004. The decline in gross profit dollars and percentage during the third quarter of 2005 was attributable to significantly higher trade spending and freight costs, partially offset by modest improvement in manufacturing efficiencies.
Selling, General and Administrative expenses increased to $3.2 million in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to $2.7 million in 2004, or 17.4% versus 15.7% of net revenue, respectively. The higher level of spending in the third quarter of 2005 was due to increases in marketing costs for new products, consumer testing programs, as well as commission expenses associated with higher revenues.
Net interest income was $68,998 in the third quarter of 2005 compared to net interest expense of $49,758 in the third quarter of 2004 due to higher interest rates on investments and increased operating cash.
The Company’s effective income tax rate was 39% in both the third quarter of 2005 and 2004.
Net loss for the third quarter of 2005 was ($269,000), or ($0.01) per basic and diluted share, as compared to net income of $956,000, or $0.05 per basic and diluted share, in the third quarter of 2004.
Nine months ended October 1, 2005 compared to the nine months ended September 25, 2004
For the nine months ended October 1, 2005, net revenue increased 11.4% to $58.3 million, compared with net revenue of $52.3 million in the first nine months of the previous year. Most of the increase came from Cinnabon®, with the potato chip products increasing 18%, primarily from the re-launch of the Boulder Canyon Natural Food™ brand, and distributed products up 52%. T.G.I. Friday’s® net revenues were flat with last year through nine months.
Gross profit for the nine months ended October 1, 2005 was $12.0 million, or 20.5% of net revenues, compared to $10.6 million, or 20.2% of net revenues for the nine months ended September 25, 2004. Excluding the brand discontinuance costs of $1.8 million in 2004, gross profit margins would have been approximately 23% for the nine months ended September 25, 2004. The decline in the gross profit percent is primarily due to the higher trade spending in this year’s third quarter.
Selling, General and Administrative expenses increased to $9.9 million, or 16.9% of net revenues for the nine months ended October 1, 2005 from $8.0 million, or 15.3% of net revenues, for the nine months ended September 25, 2004. The higher level of spending in 2005 was due to increases in marketing costs for new products,, consumer testing programs, commission expenses and personnel costs associated with higher revenues.
Net interest income was $94,728 in the first nine months of 2005 compared to net interest expense of $145,704 in the first nine months of 2004 due to higher interest rates and increased operating cash.
The Company’s effective income tax rate was 39% in both 2005 and 2004.
Net income for the nine months ended October 1, 2005 was $1.3 million, or $0.07 per basic and diluted share, compared with net income of $1.5 million, or $0.08 per basic and diluted share, in the prior-year period. Without the Crunch Toons® brand discontinuance charge of $1.8 million in 2004, net income would have been $2.6 million, or $0.14 per basic share and $0.13 per diluted share.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net working capital was $13.7 million (a current ratio of 2.7:1) at October 1, 2005 and $11.7 million (a current ratio of 2.6:1) at December 25, 2004. For the nine months ended October 1, 2005, the Company generated cash flow of $2.0 million from operating activities, principally from operating results; invested $0.4 million in new equipment; made $0.8 million in payments on long-term debt and received $0.3 million from the issuance of common stock.
14
On August 19, 2005, the Company refinanced its U.S. Bancorp Credit Agreement into a new $5.0 million Line of Credit and a $756,603 Term Loan (collectively, the “New Credit Agreement”) with the same bank. The original credit facility consisted of: (i) a $5.0 million line of credit with a borrowing limit calculated based on specified percentages of eligible receivables and inventories; (ii) a $0.5 million capital expenditures line of credit; and (iii) a $5.8 million term loan with a remaining balance of $756,603 at the time of the refinancing.
The Line of Credit bears interest at the prime rate less 0.5% (6.25% at October 1, 2005) and matures on June 30, 2007. Interest is due monthly, with the outstanding principal balance due in full at the maturity date. The Term Loan bears interest at the prime rate (6.75% at October 1, 2005) and matures on July 1, 2006. Monthly principal payments of $68,782 plus interest are due under the Term Loan. At October 1, 2005, there was no outstanding balance on the Line of Credit and $688,000 outstanding on the Term Loan.
The New Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all assets of the Company. The Company’s obligations under the New Credit Agreement are guaranteed by each of its subsidiaries. The agreement requires the Company to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants, including a minimum tangible net worth, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a minimum current ratio. At October 1, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all covenants of the New Credit Agreement.
Contractual Obligations
The Company’s future contractual obligations consist principally of long-term debt, operating leases, minimum commitments regarding third party warehouse operations services, and remaining minimum royalty payments due licensors pursuant to brand licensing agreements. There have been no material changes to the Company’s contractual obligations since year end other than scheduled payments. Under the amendments to the license agreements with Warner Bros. Consumer Products, the remaining minimum royalty payments will continue to be due throughout the remaining term of the Agreements. The Company currently has no material marketing or capital expenditure commitments.
Management’s Plans
In connection with the implementation of the Company’s business strategy, the Company may incur operating losses in the future and may require future debt or equity financings (particularly in connection with future strategic acquisitions, new brand introductions or capital expenditures). Expenditures relating to acquisition-related integration costs, market and territory expansion and new product development and introduction may adversely affect promotional and operating expenses and consequently may adversely affect operating and net income. These types of expenditures are expensed for accounting purposes as incurred, while revenue generated from the result of such expansion or new products may benefit future periods. Management believes that the Company will generate positive cash flow from operations during the next twelve months, which, along with its existing working capital and borrowing facilities, will enable the Company to meet its operating cash requirements for the next twelve months. The belief is based on current operating plans and certain assumptions, including those relating to the Company’s future revenue levels and expenditures, industry and general economic conditions and other conditions. If any of these factors change, the Company may require future debt or equity financings to meet its business requirements. There can be no assurance that any required financings will be available or, if available, will be on terms attractive to the Company.
On October 27, 2005, the Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent to acquire certain assets and liabilities of Shadewell Grove Foods, Inc., and Shadewell Grove IP, LLC, including licenses to produce and sell the Mrs. Field’s® brand ready-to-eat cookies, baking chips, brownies and toppings through grocery, drug, club, mass merchandiser and convenience store channels and certain tangible assets consisting principally of inventory and accounts receivable and minimal fixed assets. The purchase price consists of $3 million at closing and a note for $22 million. The principal amount of the note is subject to reduction to the extent the acquired business’ gross revenue levels in 2005 are less than $44 million and working capital at the closing date is less than $2 million. The Company’s obligation to pay the note is entirely contingent on a satisfactory resolution of pending legal matters relating to two important Mrs. Fields® licenses, which could come after closing. The Company plans to finance this acquisition with existing cash and new bank debt. The letter of intent is non-binding, and there can be no assurance
15
that the acquisition will be completed or that it will be completed on the terms and conditions contained in the letter of intent. Completion of the acquisition is also subject to the signing of a definitive purchase agreement, completion of the financing for the transaction and fulfillment of other closing conditions to be contained in the definitive purchase agreement.
The pending legal matters involving the Mrs. Fields® licenses concern Shadewell’s action against Mrs. Fields Franchising, LLC, filed on October 5, 2005, in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking, among other things, injunctive relief and a declaratory judgment that the Mrs. Fields® licenses remain in full force and effect and that Mrs. Fields Franchising’s effort to terminate the Mrs. Fields® licenses for Shadewell’s alleged failure to make timely payments was improper and ineffective. Mrs. Fields Franchising has disputed Shadwell’s position in the litigation and asserted that it had the right to terminate the Mrs. Fields® licenses. The Company is monitoring the status of this litigation while it continues to work with Shadewell towards definitive purchase documentation. A hearing on Shadewell’s request for declaratory and injunctive relief is currently set to begin on November 29, 2005. To the extent the litigation is not resolved prior to closing this acquisition the Company may close the acquisition and rely on the contingencies set forth in the note for protection against an adverse result in the litigation, attempt to negotiate with Shadewell for an extension of the period prior to closing or abandon the acquisition.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In December 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued an advisory requesting that all registrants describe their three to five most “critical accounting policies”. The SEC indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company believes that the following accounting policies fit this definition:
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $166,000 at October 1, 2005 and $89,000 at December 25, 2004.
Inventories. The Company’s inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. The Company identifies slow moving or obsolete inventories and estimates appropriate loss provisions related thereto. Historically, these loss provisions have not been significant; however, if actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
Goodwill and Trademarks. Goodwill and trademarks are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment between the annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are required to be tested for impairment between the annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change indicating that the asset might be impaired. The Company believes at this time that the carrying values continue to be appropriate.
Advertising and Promotional Expenses. The Company expenses production costs of advertising the first time the advertising takes place, except for cooperative advertising costs, which are expensed when the related sales are recognized. Costs associated with obtaining shelf space (i.e. “slotting fees”) are expensed in the period in which such costs are incurred by the Company. Anytime the Company offers consideration (cash or credit) as trade advertising or promotional allowance to a purchaser of products at any point along the distribution chain, the amount is accrued and recorded as a reduction in revenue. Any marketing programs that deal directly with the consumer are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Income Taxes. The Company has been profitable since 1999; however, it experienced significant net losses in prior fiscal years resulting in a net operating loss carryforward (“NOL”) for federal income tax purposes of approximately $1.9 million at December 25, 2004. Generally accepted accounting principles require that
16
the Company record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset associated with this NOL if it is “more likely than not” that the Company will not be able to utilize it to offset future taxes. The Company does not have a valuation allowance as of October 1, 2005.
The above listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of the Company’s accounting policies. In many cases the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting principles, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. See the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2004 and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K with respect to such period, which contain a description of the Company’s accounting policies and other disclosures required by accounting standards generally accepted in the United States of America.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The principal market risks to which the Company is exposed that may adversely impact the Company’s results of operations and financial position are changes in certain raw material prices and interest rates. The Company has no market risk sensitive instruments held for trading purposes.
Raw materials used by the Company are exposed to the impact of changing commodity prices. The Company’s most significant raw material requirements include potatoes, potato flakes, wheat flour, corn and oil. The Company attempts to minimize the effect of future price fluctuations related to the purchase of raw materials primarily through forward purchasing to cover future manufacturing requirements, generally for periods from one to 12 months. Futures contracts are not used in combination with the forward purchasing of these raw materials. The Company’s procurement practices are intended to reduce the risk of future price increases, but also may potentially limit the ability to benefit from possible price decreases. Inflation and changing prices have not had a material impact on the Company’s net revenues and net income. Increased transportation costs, driven by higher fuel prices, could result in higher commodity costs in the future.
The Company also has interest rate risk with respect to interest expense on variable rate debt, with rates based upon changes in the prime rate. Therefore, the Company has an exposure to changes in those rates. At October 1, 2005 the Company had $688,000 of variable rate debt outstanding. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in weighted average interest rates during fiscal 2005 would have had minimal impact on both the Company’s net earnings and cash flows.
The Company’s primary concentration of credit risk is related to certain trade accounts receivable. In the normal course of business, the Company extends unsecured credit to its customers. Substantially all of the Company’s customers are distributors or retailers whose sales are concentrated in the grocery industry, throughout the United States. The Company investigates a customer’s credit worthiness before extending credit. Two customers accounted for approximately 30% of net revenues for the nine months ended October 1, 2005 and for approximately 19% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance at the end of the quarter.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of October 1, 2005. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of October 1, 2005.
During this evaluation, the Company identified accounting errors related to product promotion obligations that were incurred in the second quarter of 2005 but not recorded in the Company’s financial statements until the third quarter of 2005. In addition, subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s third quarter earnings press release the Company became aware of a potential sales return related to product shipped in the third quarter of 2005. Also in the second and third quarters of 2005, the Company incorrectly accrued for employee sick pay benefits that had not been earned by employees.
17
With respect to the quarter ended June 25, 2005, an accounting error occurred in the Company’s trade spending accrual process, which resulted in the failure to accrue for promotional and advertising expenses relating to a promotional program for the Company’s Boulder Canyon Natural Foods™ brand. In addition, the Company’s financial statements for the quarters ended June 25, 2005 and October 1, 2005 both included an accrual for sick pay that should not have been accrued. With respect to the quarter ended October 1, 2005, the Company learned in early November that one of its distributors had requested to return an overstock of Cinnabon® brand product it purchased in the third quarter. The Company has agreed to accept the return, expects to re-sell such inventory and this adjustment is reflected in the third quarter results.
The impact of (i) the accounting errors mentioned above on the second quarter ended June 25, 2005 is a decrease of approximately $100,000 in net income, or approximately $0.01 per diluted share, and (ii) the accounting errors and the adjustment discussed above on the third quarter ended October 1, 2005 is a decrease of approximately $100,000 in the net loss, or approximately $0.01 per diluted share. For the nine months ended October 1, 2005 the aggregate impact of these items substantially offset and thus has no significant impact on net income or earnings per diluted share. The Company restated its previously issued financial statements for the quarter ended June 25, 2005 to more accurately reflect the results for that period.
The conclusion that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of October 1, 2005, was based on the identification of a material weakness in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of June 25, 2005 that continued into the third quarter ended October 1, 2005. The material weakness relates to deficiencies or inadequacies in the following specific areas: (1) execution of selected aspects of the Company’s processes and controls environment over trade spending programs to ensure prompt notification and recording of the transactions, and (2) inadequate monitoring of product inventory levels at a single large customer. This conclusion was made by management with the input of an independent consultant engaged by the Company’s audit committee.
The Company took steps during the third quarter and additional steps since then to improve its internal control structure to remediate its material weakness, including (1) hiring of additional qualified and experienced people, (2) improved documentation and reporting of trade spending programs, (3) increased reporting frequency and monitoring of trade spending and the large customer’s inventory levels, and (4) enhancements to its trade spending accrual preparation and review process. The Company intends to continue to monitor and make improvements to its policies, procedures, systems and staff who have significant roles in disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting, to address the identified deficiencies.
These were the only changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended October 1, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer do not expect that the Company’s internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
18
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is periodically a party to various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes, based on discussions with legal counsel, that the resolution of such lawsuits will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Item 1.A. Risk Factors
The risk factors described under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2004, are hereby supplemented by the addition of the following risk factor.
Material weakness in our internal controls could cause investors to lose confidence in our financial reporting, which would cause our stock price to decline.
However well designed and operated, any system of controls and procedures is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed and investors could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which could cause our stock price to decline.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
10.1 Loan Agreement (Revolving Line of Credit Loan and Term Loan) dated August 19, 2005 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association. *
10.2 Security Agreement relating to the Loan Agreement dated August 19, 2005 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association. *
10.3 $5 Million Promissory Note (Facility 1 - Revolving Line of Credit Loan) dated August 19, 2005 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association. *
10.4 $756,603 Promissory Note (Facility 2 – Term Loan) dated August 19, 2005 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association. *
19
10.5 Executive Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2005 between the Company and Steven Sklar. *
10.6 Restricted Stock Agreement dated August 1, 2005 between the Company and Steven Sklar. *
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15(d)-14(a) *
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule 15(d)-14(a) *
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. *
* - Filed Herewith
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| POORE BROTHERS, INC. | |
| | | |
| By: | /s/ | Thomas W. Freeze | |
Dated: December 1, 2005 | | Thomas W. Freeze | |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| | (principal executive officer) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| By: | /s/ | Richard M. Finkbeiner | |
Dated: December 1, 2005 | | Richard M. Finkbeiner | |
| | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, | |
| | Treasurer and Secretary | |
| | (principal financial and accounting officer) | |
21