UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
FORM 10-Q |
|
(Mark One) |
[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
For the quarterly period ended | March 31, 2002 |
or |
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _________________________ to _________________________________ |
|
Commission File Number:1-13828 |
|
MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC. |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
Delaware | 56-1505767 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I. R. S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
501 Pearl Drive (City of O'Fallon) St. Peters, Missouri | 63376
|
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
|
(636) 474-5000 |
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |X| Yes |_| No |
|
The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding at April 30, 2002 was 70,238,660. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I--FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
PART II--OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURE
EXHIBIT INDEX
PART I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Item 1.Financial Statements. |
MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
(Unaudited; Dollars in thousands, except share data) |
| | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | March 31, |
| | | 2002 | 2001 |
| | | (Successor) | (Predecessor) |
Net sales | | | $ 136,651 | $ 219,834 |
Cost of goods sold | | | 114,984 | 192,068 |
| Gross margin | | | 21,667 | 27,766 |
Operating expenses: | | | |
| Marketing and administration | | | 17,428 | 19,269 |
| Research and development | | | 6,816 | 15,092 |
| Restructuring | | | 2,174 | - |
| Operating loss | | | (4,751) | (6,595) |
Nonoperating (income) expense: | | |
| Interest expense | | | 5,055 | 22,963 |
| Interest income | | | (1,988) | (1,834) |
| Royalty income | | | (565) | (1,140) |
| Other, net | | | 900 | 2,153 |
| Total nonoperating expense | | | 3,402 | 22,142 |
| Loss before income taxes, equity in income (loss) of joint ventures and minority interests |
|
| (8,153)
| (28,737)
|
Income taxes | | | 1,454 | (10,920) |
| Loss before equity in income (loss) of joint ventures and minority interests |
|
| (9,607)
| (17,817)
|
Equity in income (loss) of joint ventures | | | (282) | 249 |
Minority interests | | | (308) | 1 |
| Net loss | | | ($ 10,197) ======= | ($ 17,567) ======= |
| Cumulative preferred stock dividends | | | ($ 7,927) ======= | N/A |
| Loss allocable to common stockholders |
|
| ($ 18,124) ======= | ($ 17,567) ======= |
| | | | |
Basic loss per share | | | ($ 0.26) ===== | ($ 0.25) ===== |
Diluted loss per share |
| | ($ 0.26) ===== | ($ 0.25) ===== |
Weighted average shares used in computing basic loss per share and diluted loss per share |
|
| 69,658,319 ========
| 69,612,900 ========
|
| | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) |
| March 31, | December 31, |
| 2002 | 2001 |
| (Unaudited) | |
ASSETS | | |
Current assets: | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ 82,137 | $ 107,159 |
| Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,048 and $3,341 in 2002 and 2001, respectively | 73,955
| 67,420
|
| Inventories | 62,241 | 69,947 |
| Prepaid and other current assets | 18,039 | 19,504 |
| Total current assets | 236,372 | 264,030 |
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $130,758 and | | |
| $113,075 in 2002 and 2001, respectively | 185,881 | 200,705 |
Investments in joint ventures | 15,299 | 15,581 |
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $736 in 2002 and 2001 | 3,761 | 3,761 |
Deferred tax assets, net | 29,837 | 30,059 |
Other assets | 35,297 | 35,198 |
| Total assets | $ 506,447 ======== | $ 549,334 ======== |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | |
Current liabilities: | | |
| Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt | $ 70,707 | $ 75,873 |
| Accounts payable | 44,128 | 52,079 |
| Accrued liabilities | 45,595 | 49,958 |
| Customer deposits | 17,570 | 19,370 |
| Provision for restructuring costs | 5,032 | 10,505 |
| Income taxes | 3,528 | 1,994 |
| Deferred income taxes | 3 | 345 |
| Accrued wages and salaries | 16,019 | 11,575 |
| Total current liabilities | 202,582 | 221,699 |
Long-term debt, less current portion | 132,568 | 144,743 |
Pension and similar liabilities | 101,018 | 100,804 |
Customer deposits | 25,071 | 25,373 |
Other liabilities | 22,213 | 25,881 |
| Total liabilities | 483,452 | 518,500 |
Minority interests | 51,391 | 51,083 |
Redeemable preferred stock: | | |
| Preferred stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 stated value per share, 260,000 shares issued and outstanding in 2002 and 2001, liquidation value $272,174 and $264,247 at 2002 and 2001, respectively | 12,174
| 4,247
|
Commitments and contingencies | | |
Stockholders' equity: | | |
| Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 260,000 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 (see above) | - -
| - -
|
| Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 71,167,865 and 70,542,105 issued at 2001 and 2000, respectively | 712
| 705 |
| Additional paid-in capital | 1,125 | 8,081 |
| Accumulated deficit | (39,594) | (29,397) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | 1,907 | 835 |
| Treasury stock, 929,205 in 2001 and 2000 | (4,720) | (4,720) |
| Total stockholders' equity | (40,570) | (24,496) |
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ 506,447 ======== | $ 549,334 ======== |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
(Unaudited; Dollars in thousands) |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2002 | 2001 |
| (Successor) | (Predecessor) |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | |
| Net loss | $ (10,197) | $ (17,567) |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 9,038 | 50,601 |
| Minority interests | 308 | (1) |
| Deferred compensation | 977 | - |
| Equity in (income) loss of joint ventures | 282 | (249) |
| Working capital and other | (6,964) | (8,449) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | (6,556) | 24,335 |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | |
| Capital expenditures | (2,669) | (12,747) |
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | - | 17 |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (2,669) | (12,730) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | |
| Net short-term borrowings | (2,084) | 16,852 |
| Principal payments on long-term debt | (14,079) | (13,609) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (16,163) | 3,243 |
Effect of exchange rates changes on cash and cash equivalents | 366 | (4,534) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (25,022) | 10,314 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 107,159 | 94,759 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ 82,137 ======= | $ 105,073 ======= |
| | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(1)Nature of Operations
MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. and subsidiaries (MEMC), is a leading worldwide producer of silicon wafers for the semiconductor industry. We have production facilities owned directly in Italy, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea, and the United States and through a joint venture in Taiwan. Our customers include virtually all major semiconductor device manufacturers including the world's largest foundries as well as the major memory, microprocessor, and application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) manufacturers.
(2)Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of our significant accounting policies is presented in our audited financial statements and related management's discussion and analysis for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 contained in Exhibit 13 to our annual report on Form 10-K as amended for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. See also management's discussion and analysis below.
(3)Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of MEMC, in our opinion, include all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring items) necessary to present fairly MEMC's financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. We have presented the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the requirements of Regulation S-X and consequently do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. This report on Form 10-Q, including unaudited consolidated financial statements, should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K, as amended on Form 10-K/A, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, which contains MEMC's audited financial statements for such year and the related management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2002.
(4)Earnings (loss) per share
The numerator of the basic and diluted loss per share calculation was net loss allocable to common stockholders. Cumulative preferred stock dividends were not added back to the net loss, as the related conversion of the preferred stock would have been antidilutive. For all periods, the preferred stock, the warrants, and the options outstanding were not considered in computing diluted loss per share, as they were antidilutive.
At March 31, 2002, MEMC had 9,421,080 options outstanding, 16,666,667 warrants, 380,124 shares of unvested restricted common stock, and preferred stock convertible into 120,966,252 shares of common stock, which were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share due to the net loss incurred during the three month period ended March 31, 2002.
(5)Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
| March 31, | December 31, |
| 2002 | 2001 |
Raw materials and supplies | $ 23,911 | $ 30,882 |
Goods in process | 24,437 | 22,088 |
Finished goods | 13,893 | 16,977 |
| $ 62,241 ======= | $ 69,947 ======= |
Beginning in 2002, we transitioned our 300 millimeter operations from a pilot line to full-scale production. Consequently, beginning in 2002, 300 millimeter revenues and associated production costs are presented in Net Sales and Cost of Goods Sold, respectively. In the first quarter of 2002, costs of sales associated with 300 millimeter product did not include approximately $3,000 of costs for material which had been expensed as technology costs in a prior period.
(6)Restructuring Costs
During the first quarter of 2002, we reduced our workforce by approximately 100 employees, including U.S., Italy and Japan salaried and hourly employees. We recorded a restructuring charge of $2,174 related to these actions. This entire amount is expected to be paid out in cash during fiscal 2002.
In the 2002 first quarter, we recorded an adjustment to reduce the restructuring reserve by $3,700. This amount was considered to be an adjustment to purchase accounting affecting our balance sheet at November 13, 2001, rather than as a current benefit in our statement of operations.
| Asset Inpairment/ Write-off | Dismantling And Related Costs | Personnel Costs | Total |
Balance, December 31, 2001, as adjusted | $ 490 | $ 2,584 | $ 3,731 | $ 6,805 |
Reclassification | - | 113 | (113) | - |
Charges taken | - | - | 2,174 | 2,174 |
Amounts utilized | - | (243) | (3,704) | (3,947) |
Balance, March 31, 2002 | $ 490 ==== | $ 2,454 ===== | $ 2,088 ===== | $ 5,032 ===== |
Of the $5,032 restructuring reserve at March 31, 2002, approximately $2,100 is expected to be paid out in 2002. The majority of the remaining reserve relates to the Spartanburg facility. Timing for utilization of the remainder of the reserve is primarily dependent on the timing of the sale of this facility.
(7)Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 was $9,125 and $20,360, respectively. MEMC's only adjustment from net loss to comprehensive loss was foreign currency translation adjustments in all periods presented.
(8)Debt
Our unsecured borrowings from banks total approximately $42,000 at March 31, 2002, under approximately $85,000 of short-term loan agreements. In addition, an investor group led by Texas Pacific Group (collectively, "TPG") retained 55 million Euro (approximately $48,000) in principal amount of a note currently outstanding issued by our Italian subsidiary. We recorded the 55 million Euro Italian subsidiary note at its fair market value of 1 dollar as of November 13, 2001. We will accrete this debt instrument up to its face value in less than one year using the effective interest method. At March 31, 2002, the accreted value of this note was less than $10. Assuming the note remains outstanding until its scheduled maturity date, interest expense related to the accretion of the 55 million Euro Italian subsidiary note will approximate $1,000 and $47,000 for the second and third quarters of 2002, respectively. Pursuant to the restructuring agreement between us and TPG, we have agreed to restructure the 55 millio n Euro Italian subsidiary note on terms set forth in the restructuring agreement. It was originally contemplated that our Italian subsidiary would secure and deliver to TPG a senior secured note due 2031 in the principal amount of 55 million Euro, guaranteed by us, bearing interest at a rate of 6% per annum (payment in kind) and secured by substantially all the assets of our Italian subsidiary. The parties have been unable to restructure the Italian note on the original terms contemplated in the restructuring agreement. We are currently reviewing with TPG alternatives to the originally contemplated restructuring of this debt.
We have long-term committed loan agreements of approximately $281,000 at March 31, 2002, of which approximately $161,000 is outstanding. In addition, we have recorded a $50,000 senior subordinated secured note at its fair market value of 1 dollar as of November 13, 2001. We will accrete this debt instrument up to its face value in six years using the effective interest rate method. At March 31, 2002, the accreted value of this note was less than $1.
(9)Income Taxes
For the quarter ended March 31, 2002, we recognized income tax expense of $1,454, as compared to an income tax benefit of $10,920 for the first quarter of 2001. We have recognized no tax benefit for operating loss carryforwards in the current quarter. Income tax expense in the 2002 first quarter relates to tax jurisdictions in which we expect to owe current taxes and foreign withholding taxes.
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code restricts the utilization of net operating losses and other carryover tax attributes upon the occurrence of an ownership change, as defined. Such an ownership change occurred during 2001 as a result of the acquisition by TPG of E.ON's debt and equity holdings in MEMC. We believe that a significant majority of our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards through November 13, 2001 will be utilized or applied to reduce our tax attributes, under IRC Section 108(b), as a result of the TPG transaction. To the extent that any U.S. or foreign net operating loss carryforwards remain or are created after November 13, 2001, we have recognized a valuation allowance to fully offset any associated deferred tax assets. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2002, our net operating loss carryforwards do not carry any value in our consolidated balance sheet.
(10)Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The statement requires, among other things, the discontinuation of goodwill amortization for business combinations before July 1, 2001 and completion of a transitional goodwill impairment test. If a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value, a goodwill impairment is recognized to the extent that the reporting unit's carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill. The amount of impairment, if any, identified in performing the transitional impairment test is required to be recognized as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. We believe there is no indication of impairment at March 31, 2002 and have recorded no impairment charges for the three months ended March 31, 2002.
(11)Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Deposed Of
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, that replaces SFAS No. 121. The provisions of SFAS No. 144 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and, generally, are to be applied prospectively. SFAS No. 144 requires that long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, including those of discontinued operations, be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, whether reported in continuing operations or in discontinued operations. Discontinued operations will no longer be measured at net realizable value or include amounts for operating losses that have not yet been incurred. We have measured long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and have recorded no changes for the three months ended March 31, 2002.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Net Sales.
Our net sales decreased by 38% to $137 million in first quarter 2002 from $220 million in first quarter 2001. This decrease was primarily caused by a 23% decrease in product volumes, as well as a significant decline in average selling prices resulting from the weakened market conditions in the semiconductor and silicon wafer industries in first quarter 2002 compared to first quarter 2001. The product volume and average selling price declines were across all product diameters. 200 millimeter diameter and epitaxial wafers represented 67% of our product volume for first quarter 2002, compared to 68% for first quarter 2001.
Gross Margin.
In first quarter 2002, our gross margin was $22 million compared to $28 million in first quarter 2001. This decline resulted from significant decreases in both product volumes and average selling prices, partially offset by continued benefits realized from our cost reduction and manufacturing improvement programs and by reductions in depreciation and amortization resulting from pushing down TPG's nominal basis in MEMC to our accounting records. While our product volumes decreased 23% in first quarter 2002 compared to first quarter 2001, our cost of sales decreased by 40%. Approximately half of this cost reduction related to decreased depreciation and amortization from pushing down TPG's nominal basis in MEMC to our accounting records.
Beginning in 2002, we transitioned our 300 millimeter operations from a pilot line to full-scale production. Consequently, beginning in 2002, 300 millimeter revenues and associated production costs are presented in Net Sales and Cost of Goods Sold, respectively. In the first quarter of 2002, costs of sales associated with 300 millimeter product did not include approximately $3,000 of costs for material which had been expensed as technology costs in a prior period.
Research and Development.
Our research and development expenses decreased in the 2002 first quarter to $7 million compared to $15 million in the year ago period. The decreased expense resulted from continued cost control, lower headcount, reductions in depreciation and amortization resulting from pushdown accounting, and transition of our 300 millimeter operations from a pilot line to full-scale production. Consequently, in the first quarter 2002, 300 millimeter revenues and associated production costs have been presented in Net Sales and Cost of Goods Sold, respectively.
Interest Expense.
In first quarter 2002, our interest expense decreased to $5 million from $23 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2001. Effective November 13, 2001, TPG and MEMC restructured MEMC's debt acquired by TPG from E.ON, resulting in a substantial decrease in our debt outstanding. As of March 31, 2002, the book value of our debt outstanding totaled $203 million, compared to $1,054 million at March 31, 2001.
In connection with the debt restructuring, TPG retained 55 million Euro (approximately $48 million) in principal amount of a note issued by our Italian subsidiary. This note was recorded at its fair market value of one dollar and will accrete interest up to its face value in less than one year using the effective interest rate method. Assuming the note remains outstanding until its scheduled maturity date, interest expense related to the accretion of the 55 million Euro Italian subsidiary note will approximate $1 million and $47 million for the second and third quarters of 2002, respectively. Pursuant to the restructuring agreement between us and TPG, we agreed to restructure the 55 million Euro Italian subsidiary note on terms set forth in the restructuring agreement. It was originally contemplated that our Italian subsidiary would secure and deliver to TPG a senior secured note due 2031 in the principal amount of 55 million Euro, guaranteed by us, bearing interest at a rate of 6% per annum (payment in k ind) and secured by substantially all the assets of our Italian subsidiary. The parties have been unable to restructure the Italian note on the original terms contemplated in the restructuring agreement. We are currently reviewing with TPG alternatives to the originally contemplated restructuring of this debt.
Income Taxes.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2002, we recognized income tax expense of $1.5 million, as compared to an income tax benefit of $10.9 million for the first quarter of 2001. We have recognized no tax benefit for operating loss carryforwards in the current quarter. Income tax expense in the 2002 first quarter relates to tax jurisdictions in which we expect to owe current taxes and foreign withholding taxes.
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code restricts the utilization of net operating losses and other carryover tax attributes upon the occurrence of an ownership change, as defined. Such an ownership change occurred during 2001 as a result of the acquisition by TPG of E.ON's debt and equity holdings in MEMC. We believe that a significant majority of our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards through November 13, 2001 will be utilized or applied to reduce our tax attributes, under IRC Section 108(b), as a result of the TPG transaction. To the extent that any U.S. or foreign net operating loss carryforwards remain or were created after November 13, 2001, we have recognized a valuation allowance to fully offset any associated deferred tax assets. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2002, our net operating loss carryforwards do not carry any value in our consolidated balance sheet.
Equity in Income (Loss) of Joint Ventures.
In first quarter 2002, equity in loss of joint ventures was $0.3 million, compared to income of $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2001. The decreased income was a result of a moderate decline in Taisil's product volumes, as well as a significant decrease in Taisil's average selling prices.
Outlook.
We expect to continue double-digit sequential growth in sales in the 2002 second quarter over the 2002 first quarter, primarily as a result of a continued recovery in product volumes. We expect our top line sales in the 2002 second quarter to approach levels achieved in the year-ago second quarter. We also expect our margins to improve sequentially in the 2002 second quarter. We are cautiously optimistic that product volumes will continue to recover as 2002 progresses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
The silicon wafer industry is highly capital intensive. Our capital needs depend on numerous factors, including our profitability and investment in capital expenditures and research and development.
As almost all semiconductors are manufactured from silicon wafers, the strength of the silicon wafer industry is highly correlated to the performance of the semiconductor industry. The semiconductor device industry historically has been a high-growth, cyclical industry. The cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry can cause wide fluctuations in our product volumes, average selling prices, operating results, and cash flows.
At March 31, 2002, we had $82 million of cash and cash equivalents compared to $107 million at December 31, 2001. Our consolidated subsidiary, MEMC Korea Company ("MKC") had cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2002 of approximately $68 million. Under Korean law there are restrictions on MKC's ability to pay dividends and make loans, thereby limiting our access to MKC's cash assets.
Cash flows used in operating activities were $7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002, compared to cash provided in operating activities of $24 million for the three months ended March 31, 2000. This is primarily a result of significantly lower sales in 2002 versus 2001.
Accounts receivable of $74 million at March 31, 2002 increased $7 million, or 10%, from $67 million at December 31, 2001. This increase was primarily attributable to the 13% increase in net sales during first quarter 2002 compared to the fourth quarter of 2001. Days' sales outstanding were 49 days at March 31, 2002 compared to 51 days at December 31, 2001 based upon annualized sales for the respective immediately preceding quarters.
Our inventories decreased $8 million, or 11%, from December 31, 2001 to $62 million at March 31, 2002. Total related inventory reserves for obsolescence, lower of cost or market issues, or other impairments were $18 million and $17 million at March 31, 2002, and December 31, 2001, respectively. Quarter-end inventories as a percentage of annualized quarterly net sales decreased to 11% for the period ended March 31, 2002 compared to 15% for the period ended December 31, 2001.
Our net deferred tax assets remained constant at $30 million at March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001. We provide for income taxes on a quarterly basis based on an estimated annual effective tax rate. Management believes it is more likely than not that, with its projections of future taxable income and after consideration of the valuation allowance, MEMC will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the benefits of the net deferred tax assets existing at March 31, 2002.
Our cash used in investing activities decreased $10 million to $3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002 compared to $13 million in the three months ended March 31, 2001. Our capital expenditures in the first three months of 2002 primarily related to maintenance capital. We expect to tightly control capital expenditures in 2002. At March 31, 2002, we had less than $10 million of committed capital expenditures related to various manufacturing and technology projects.
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities decreased to ($16) million in the three months ended March 31, 2002 from $3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2001. The decrease in borrowings was primarily attributable to payments of principal on amortizing debt that became due during the period.
Our unsecured borrowings from banks total approximately $42 million at March 31, 2002, under approximately $85 million of short-term loan agreements. In addition, TPG retained 55 million Euro (approximately $48 million) in principal amount of a note currently outstanding issued by our Italian subsidiary. We recorded the 55 million Euro Italian subsidiary note at its fair market value of 1 dollar as of November 13, 2001. We will accrete this debt instrument up to its face value in less than one year using the effective interest method. At March 31, 2002, the accreted value of this note was less than $10. Assuming the note remains outstanding until its scheduled maturity date, interest expense related to the accretion of the 55 million Euro Italian subsidiary note will approximate $1 million and $47 million for the second and third quarters of 2002, respectively. Pursuant to the restructuring agreement between us and TPG, we have agreed to restructure the 55 million Euro Italian subsidiary note on terms set forth in the restructuring agreement. It was originally contemplated that our Italian subsidiary would secure and deliver to TPG a senior secured note due 2031 in the principal amount of 55 million Euro, guaranteed by us, bearing interest at a rate of 6% per annum (payment in kind) and secured by substantially all the assets of our Italian subsidiary. The parties have been unable to restructure the Italian debt on the original terms contemplated in the restructuring agreement. We are currently reviewing with TPG alternatives to the originally contemplated restructuring of this debt.
We have long-term committed loan agreements of approximately $281 million at March 31, 2002, of which approximately $161 million is outstanding. In addition, we have recorded the $50 million senior subordinated secured note at its fair market value of 1 dollar. We will accrete this debt instrument up to its face value in six years using the effective interest rate method. At March 31, 2002, the accreted value of this note was less than $1.
As part of the purchase and restructuring transactions on November 13, 2001, TPG committed to provide us with a five-year $150 million revolving credit facility. That revolving credit facility has been replaced with a revolving credit facility with Citibank, guaranteed by TPG. Citibank has subsequently assigned 50% of its interest in this credit facility to UBS AG. Loans under this facility bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.5% or alternate base rate plus 0.5% per annum.
Loans can be made under this credit facility subject to certain conditions and the following aggregate lending limitations:
| * $50 million at any time prior to January 1, 2002 |
| * $75 million at any time prior to April 1, 2002 |
| * $100 million at any time prior to July 1, 2002 |
| * $125 million at any time prior to October 1, 2002 |
| * $150 million at any time on or after October 1, 2002 |
At March 31, 2002, we had drawn $30 million against this credit facility.
The Citibank revolving credit facility and the indenture for our senior subordinated secured notes contain certain highly restrictive covenants, including covenants to maintain minimum quarterly consolidated EBITDA; minimum monthly consolidated backlog; minimum monthly consolidated revenues; maximum annual capital expenditures; and other covenants customary for revolving loans and indentures of this type and size. The minimum quarterly consolidated EBITDA covenant is negative $10 million, $0 million and positive $8 million in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2002, respectively. Thereafter, the minimum quarterly consolidated EBITDA covenant progressively increases to $25 million, $35 million, $44 million, $52 million and $60 million at the end of the last quarter of 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively. The minimum monthly consolidated backlog covenant was 30 million square inches (msi) in January 2002 and progressively increases to 38 msi, 53 msi, 63 msi, 74 msi, 81 msi and 92 msi in the last month of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The minimum monthly consolidated revenues covenant was $34 million in January 2002 and progressively increases to $48 million, $56 million, $67 million, $76 million, $84 million and $92 million in the last month of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively. Finally, the maximum annual capital expenditures covenant is $45 million and $50 million for 2002 and 2003, respectively, and increases to $55 million for each of 2004 through 2007. In the event that we were in violation of these covenants, which in our highly cyclical industry could occur in a sudden or sustained downturn, the loan commitments under the revolving credit facility may terminate and the loans and accrued interest then outstanding under the facility and the senior subordinated secured notes and related accrued interest may be due and payable immediately.
The $150 million Citibank revolving credit facility is guaranteed by TPG. The terms of the various guaranties are shorter than the term of the revolving credit facility. Certain affiliates of Texas Pacific Group have guaranteed 60% of our obligations under the revolving credit facility. The Texas Pacific Group guaranty terminates on December 21, 2003. TCW/Crescent Mezzanine Partners III, L.P. and certain of its affiliates have guaranteed 20% of our obligations under the revolving credit facility. The TCW/Crescent guaranty terminates on December 20, 2002. Finally, certain affiliates of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P. have guaranteed the remaining 20% of our obligations under the revolving credit facility. The Leonard Green guaranty terminates December 20, 2002. In addition, each guarantor may terminate its guaranty for any reason. In the event that a guarantor terminates its guaranty, or does not renew its guaranty and in the case of a non-renewal the lenders have not received cash collateral or a repl acement guaranty executed by a replacement guarantor satisfactory to the lenders, then the loan commitments under the revolving credit facility will terminate and we will be required to repay all outstanding loans and accrued interest on this facility. Likewise, if any guarantor defaults under its guaranty, then the guarantor's default will constitute an event of default under this revolving credit facility. In such event, the loan commitments under this revolving credit facility may terminate and the loans and accrued interest under the facility may be due and payable immediately.
In any of these events, the guarantors and their affiliates have severally agreed to make new revolving credit loans available to us on terms and conditions no less favorable to us than provided in the original $150 million revolving credit facility between us and TPG. The original TPG $150 million revolving credit facility was substantially similar to the Citibank $150 million revolving credit facility except that the interest rates were 2% higher than the interest rates under the Citibank revolving credit facility. Accordingly, we could be required to pay higher interest rates on any replacement financing provided by the guarantors. In addition, the guarantors may not have sufficient funds and assets to provide this replacement financing and we may be required to obtain replacement financing from third parties. We cannot be certain that we would be able to obtain the replacement financing on a timely basis or at all.
The $150 million Citibank revolving credit facility, the indenture for the senior subordinated secured notes and the certificate of designations for our preferred stock contain change in control provisions. Under these instruments, if (1) TPG's ownership interest in us is reduced below 15% (or, in the case of the indenture, 30%) of our total outstanding equity interests, (2) another person or group acquires ownership of a greater percentage of our outstanding equity than TPG, or (3) a majority of our board of directors is neither nominated by our board of directors nor appointed by directors so nominated, then:
| * our preferred stock becomes redeemable at the option of the holders at 101% of its stated value plus the amount, if any, of all accumulated and unpaid dividends; |
| * an event of default shall be deemed to have occurred under the Citibank revolving credit facility in which event the loan commitments under this facility may terminate and the loans and accrued interest then outstanding may become immediately due and payable; and |
| * the holders of our senior subordinated secured notes will have the right to require us to repurchase the notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. |
In such event, we may not have sufficient funds to redeem the preferred stock, repay the outstanding loans and accrued interest under the Citibank revolving credit facility and/or repurchase the senior subordinated secured notes and we would need to seek and obtain replacement financing. We cannot be certain that we would be able to refinance these amounts.
Under the terms of the 55 million Euro Italian subsidiary note, we are required to pay 50% of our annual net free cash flow, which is net of capital expenditures, as a mandatory principal repayment of this note. We are also required to pay 75% of any cash received from MKC through dividends, reductions or repurchases of equity, share redemptions or loans as a mandatory principal repayment of this note.
We believe that we have the financial resources needed to meet business requirements for the next twelve months, including capital expenditures and working capital requirements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related footnotes. In preparing these financial statements, management has made its best estimates of certain amounts included in the financial statements. However, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Push Down Accounting
As a result of the purchase of E.ON's equity interest in MEMC by TPG and the rights possessed by TPG through its ownership of the preferred stock, we applied purchase accounting and pushed down TPG's nominal basis in MEMC to our accounting records, reflected in our consolidated financial statements subsequent to November 13, 2001. Assuming full conversion of the preferred stock, excluding any accrued but unpaid dividends, TPG would own 89.4% of MEMC's common stock.
To revalue our assets and liabilities, we first estimated their fair market values. To the extent the fair market value differed from the book value, 89.4% of that difference was recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of the respective asset or liability. To the extent the adjusted net carrying value of assets and liabilities exceeded the pushed down basis of TPG's investment in MEMC, negative goodwill was generated. The negative goodwill was then allocated to the bases of existing goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets, investments in joint ventures, and property, plant and equipment.
This revaluation resulted in a net decrease to assets of approximately $800 million and a net decrease to liabilities of approximately $900 million. The allocation of the purchase price to our assets and liabilities is subject to further refinement.
The net decrease in assets reflects the write-down of goodwill, certain intangible assets, investments in joint ventures, and property, plant and equipment to reflect TPG's nominal purchase price. We expect the write-down of property, plant and equipment, goodwill, and intangible assets to result in a reduction in our depreciation and amortization of approximately $150 million in 2002. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Inventory Reserves
We adjust the value of our obsolete and unmarketable inventory to the estimated market value based upon assumptions of future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed of
We review long-lived assets to assess recoverability from future operations using future net cash flows. When necessary, we record charges for impairments at the amount by which the present value of the future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are valued at the carrying amount or at fair value, less costs to sell, if lower.
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes arise because of different treatment between financial statement accounting and tax accounting, known as temporary differences. We record the tax effect of these temporary differences as deferred tax assets (generally items that can be used as a tax deduction or credit in future periods) and deferred tax liabilities (generally items that we received a tax deduction for, but have not yet been recorded in the statement of operations). A valuation allowance is recorded because some items recorded as deferred tax assets may not be deductible or creditable. We provide for U.S. income taxes on earnings of consolidated international subsidiaries that we plan to remit to the U.S. We do not provide for U.S. income taxes on the remaining earnings of these subsidiaries, as we expect to reinvest these earnings overseas or we expect the taxes to be minimal based upon available foreign tax credits.
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) restricts the utilization of net operating losses and other carryover tax attributes upon the occurrence of an ownership change. Such an ownership change occurred during 2001 as a result of the acquisition by TPG of all of E.ON's debt and equity interest in MEMC. We believe that a significant majority of our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards will be utilized or applied to reduce our tax attributes, under IRC Section 108(b), as a result of the transactions with TPG. To the extent that any U.S. or foreign net operating loss carryforwards remain, we have recognized a valuation allowance to fully offset any associated deferred tax assets. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2001, our net operating loss carryforwards do not carry any value in our consolidated balance sheet.
Push down accounting as described above created differences in the bases of certain assets and liabilities for financial statement accounting and for tax accounting. These differences resulted in the recognition of a net deferred tax asset. We reviewed our total net deferred tax assets by taxable jurisdiction and recognized a valuation allowance where it was determined more likely than not that we would be unable to realize a benefit from these assets.
Revenue Recognition
We record revenue from product sales when the goods are shipped and title passes to the customer. Our silicon wafers are made to customer specifications at plant sites that have been pre-qualified by the customer. We conduct rigorous quality control testing procedures to ensure that the finished silicon wafers meet the customer's specifications before the product is shipped.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
This Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including those concerning: the amount of the restructuring reserve expected to be paid out in the second quarter of 2002; the timing and utilization of the remainder of the restructuring reserve; interest expense related to the accretion on the 55 million Euro note in the second and third quarters of 2002; our expectation regarding the utilization of our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards; our expectations of continued double-digit sequential growth in sales in the 2002 second quarter over the 2002 first quarter; our expectation that top line sales in the 2002 second quarter will approach levels achieved in the year-ago second quarter; our expectations that margins will improve sequentially in the 2002 second quarter; our cautious optimism that product volumes will continue to recover as 2002 progresses; and our belief that we have the financial resources needed to m eet business requirements for the next twelve months. Such statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties include such factors as: market demand for silicon wafers; utilization of manufacturing capacity; inventory levels of our customers; demand for semiconductors generally; changes in the pricing environment; general economic conditions; our ability to reduce manufacturing costs; actions by our competitors, customers and suppliers; changes in currency exchange rates; the impact of competitive products and technologies; technological changes; changes in product specifications and manufacturing processes; accuracy of management's assumptions regarding the dismantling and sale of the Spartanburg facility; changes in financial market conditions; changes in interest rates; and other risks described in MEMC's filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including MEMC's a nnual report on Form 10-K, as amended on Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting requirements for retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets.
We do not believe the implementation of Statements No. 143 will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market risks relating to MEMC's operations result primarily from changes in interest rates and changes in foreign exchange rates. MEMC enters into currency forward contracts to minimize its transactional currency risks. MEMC does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. There have been no significant changes in MEMC's holdings of interest rate sensitive or foreign currency exchange rate sensitive instruments since December 31, 2001.
PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8- K. |
(a) Exhibits |
| Exhibit Number | Description
|
|
| | |
| 2-a | Restructuring Agreement between TPG Wafer Holdings LLC and the Company, dated as of November 13, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 28, 2001) |
| 2-b | Merger Agreement between TPG Wafer Holdings LLC and the Company, dated as of November 13, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 28, 2001) |
| 3(i) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-a of the Company's Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 1995) |
| 3(i)(a) | Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on June 2, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(a) of the Company 's Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2000) |
| 3(ii) | Restated By-laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Company 's Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 2001) |
| 3 (iii) | Certificate of Designations of Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company, dated as of November 13, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 28, 2001) |
| 4-a | Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of December 21, 2001, among the Company, Citibank, N.A., as trustee, and Citicorp USA, Inc., as collateral agent, and Form of Note attached as an exhibit thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 14, 2002) |
| 4-a(1) | Security Agreement among the Company, each subsidiary listed on Schedule I thereto, and Citicorp USA, Inc., dated as of November 13, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 28, 2001) |
| 4-a(2) | Pledge Agreement among the Company, each subsidiary listed on Schedule I thereto, and Citicorp USA, Inc., dated as of November 13, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 28, 2001) |
| 4-a(3) | Indemnity, Subrogation and Contribution Agreement among the Company, each subsidiary listed on Schedule I thereto, and Citicorp USA, Inc., dated as of November 13, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 28, 2001) |
| 4-a(4) | Guarantee Agreement among the Company, each subsidiary listed on Schedule I thereto, and Citicorp USA, Inc., dated as of November 13, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 28, 2001) |
| 4-a(5) | Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 21, 2002, to Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of December 21, 2001, among the Company, Citibank, N.A., as trustee, and Citicorp USA, Inc., as collateral agent |
| 4-b | Form of Warrant Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 28, 2001) |
| 10-aa | Agreement dated February 1, 2002 between the Company and Julius R. Glaser |
| 10-cc (9) | Form of Stock Option Agreement (4-year vesting) |
| 10-cc (10) | Form of Stock Option Agreement (2-year cliff vesting) |
| 10-cc (11) | Form of Stock Option Agreement (7-year cliff vesting) |
| 10-dd | Restated MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan |
| 10-dd (1) | Form of Stock Option Agreement (4-year vesting) |
| 10-dd (2) | Form of Stock Option Agreement (7-year cliff vesting) |
| 10-ee | Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2002 between the Company and James M. Stolze |
| 10-hh | Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2002 between the Company and Jonathon P. Jansky |
| 10-www(5) | Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 21, 2002, to the Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2001, among the Company, the lenders party thereto, and Citicorp USA, Inc. |
| 10-www(6) | Omnibus Amendment Agreement, dated January 25, 2002, among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc. and the other signatories thereto |
| 10-www(7) | Omnibus Amendment Agreement No. 2, dated March 27, 2002, among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc. and the other signatories thereto |
| | |
| | |
------------------------------- |
|
(b) Reports on Form 8-K |
|
During the first quarter of 2002, we filed the following current report on Form 8-K: |
|
1. Item 5 and Item 7 Form 8-K filed on January 14, 2002. |
SIGNATURE |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. |
|
|
| MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. |
May 13, 2002 | /s/ James M. Stolze |
| James M. Stolze |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (on behalf of the registrant and as principal financial and accounting officer) |
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX |
The exhibits below are numbered in accordance with the Exhibit Table of Item 601of Regulation S-K. |
| | |
| Number Exhibit | Description
|
| | |
| 4-a(5) | Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 21, 2002, to Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of December 21, 2001, among the Company, Citibank, N.A., as trustee, and Citicorp USA, Inc., as collateral agent |
| 10-aa | Agreement dated February 1, 2002 between the Company and Julius R. Glaser |
| 10-cc (9) | Form of Stock Option Agreement (4-year vesting) |
| 10-cc (10) | Form of Stock Option Agreement (2-year cliff vesting) |
| 10-cc (11) | Form of Stock Option Agreement (7-year cliff vesting) |
| 10-dd | Restated MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan |
| 10-dd (1) | Form of Stock Option Agreement (4-year vesting) |
| 10-dd (2) | Form of Stock Option Agreement (7-year cliff vesting) |
| 10-ee | Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2002 between the Company and James M. Stolze |
| 10-hh | Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2002 between the Company and Jonathan P. Jansky |
| 10-www(5) | Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 21, 2002, to the Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2001, among the Company, the lenders party thereto, and Citicorp USA, Inc. |
| 10-www(6) | Omnibus Amendment Agreement, dated January 25, 2002, among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc. and the other signatories thereto |
| 10-www(7) | Omnibus Amendment Agreement No. 2, dated March 27, 2002, among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc. and the other signatories thereto |