Exhibit 99.1
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
June 30, 2010
RECENT COMMITMENTS — (See Body of Report For Contract Details/Date Changes and Other Information)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominal | | | | | | | | | | Dayrate | | | | |
Rig Name | | WD* | | Location | | Status | | Operator | | Current Term | | ($000s) | | Start Date | | Est. End Date |
Domestic Deepwater Semisubmersibles (4) (Note 1) | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Victory(Note 2) | | 5,500’ | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Newfield | | two wells | | low 300’s | | early Feb. 2010 | | mid July 2010 |
| | | | GOM | | Actively Marketing | | DODI | | Gap in contract | | | | mid July 2010 | | early Nov. 2010 |
| | | | GOM | | Contract Continuation | | ATP | | continue six-well minimum | | low 560’s | | early Nov. 2010 | | early Feb. 2011 |
| | | | GOM | | Actively Marketing | | DODI | | Gap in contract | | | | early Feb. 2011 | | early June 2011 |
| | | | GOM | | Contract Continuation | | ATP | | remaining days of one-year term | | low 540’s | | early June 2011 | | mid Aug. 2011 |
Ocean Endeavor(Note 3) | | 10,000’ | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Devon | | four-year term + unpricedoption | | mid 290’s | | early July 2007 | | late June 2011 |
Ocean Monarch(Note 4) | | 10,000’ | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Cobalt | | through early August | | low 440’s | | | | early August 2010 |
| | | | GOM | | Resume Original Anadarko Contract | | Anadarko | | continuation of four-year term | | low 440’s | | early August 2010 | | mid March 2013 |
Ocean Confidence(Note 5) | | 10,000’ | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Murphy | | four-year term + unpricedoption | | low 510’s | | late Feb. 2008 | | mid Feb. 2012 |
| | |
Note (1). | | On May 30, 2010, the U.S. government implemented a six-month moratorium on certain drilling activities in water deeper than 500 feet in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and subsequently implemented enhanced safety requirements applicable to all drilling activities in the GOM, including drilling activities in water shallower than 500 feet. On June 22, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana granted a temporary injunction which immediately prohibited enforcement of the moratorium. The U.S. government has appealed the decision. We have nine rigs under contract in the GOM, five of which are contracted to perform operations in water deeper than 500 feet. We are not able to predict the outcome of these legal proceedings, whether enforcement of the moratorium will be permanently enjoined, or whether the U.S. government will seek to implement additional restrictions on or prohibitions of drilling activities in the GOM; and we are not able to predict the impact of these events on our operations. Our customers may seek to move rigs to locations outside of the GOM, perform activities permitted under the moratorium and the enhanced safety requirements, or attempt to terminate our contracts pursuant to their respective force majeure provisions. If an actual force majeure event occurs, as determined under the applicable contract, these agreements generally provide for a force majeure rate that extends for a specified period of time and varies from contract to contract. Several customers have either declared force majeure or indicated that they may declare force majeure under their relevant contracts. We are working closely with our customers to assess each situation. We have indicated in this report those contracts with respect to which force majeure has been claimed and contract revenue may be lost. |
|
Note (2). | | Victory—In regard solely to the ATP contract, for a minimum of the first 240 days of the initial one-year contract period, Contract Drilling Revenue is to be recognized under normal GAAP accrual accounting at $540,000 per day, and additional contract dayrate of $20,000 is to be recognized as interest income over applicable periods reflecting deferred payment plan. The contract calls for $75,000 per day of the $560,000 contract dayrate to be paid on a current basis and the remaining $485,000 per day to be paid pursuant to an overriding royalty interest structure, as discussed in the Company’s Form 8-K that was filed on June 3, 2009. Remaining days under the initial one-year contract period will be deferred until approximately the fourth quarter of 2011, when the contract provides that the rig will be utilized by the operator at a dayrate of $540,000 payable in cash. |
|
Notes (3,4,5). | | Endeavor, Monarch, Confidence —We received a notice from the operator of each of the named rigs claiming force majeure on the grounds that the moratorium implemented by the U.S. government would prevent them from drilling in the GOM. We have notified these operators that we do not view the moratorium as coming within the definition of force majeure under the respective contracts, especially in light of the temporary injunction which immediately prohibited enforcement of the moratorium. We are currently in discussions with these operators in this regard. |
2
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
June 30, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominal | | | | | | | | | | Dayrate | | | | |
Rig Name | | WD* | | Location | | Status | | Operator | | Current Term | | ($000s) | | Start Date | | Est. End Date |
Domestic 2nd Generation Semisubmersibles (1) (Note 1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Saratoga | | 2,200’ | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Taylor | | 410-day term | | 200- 210 | | early June 2009 | | mid July 2010 |
| | | | GOM | | Future Contract | | Taylor | | one-year extension | | 200- 210 | | mid July 2010 | | late June 2011 |
Domestic Jack-ups (4) (Note 1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Columbia(Note 6) | | 250’ IC | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Chevron | | four wells + unpricedoption | | mid 40’s | | mid Feb. 2010 | | midJuly 2010 |
Ocean Spartan | | 300’ IC | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Nippon | | four wells | | low 50’s | | early June 2010 | | mid July 2010 |
| | | | GOM | | Special Survey | | DODI | | | | | | late Oct. 2010 | | mid Dec. 2010 |
Ocean Scepter(Note 7) | | 350’ IC | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Arena | | six wells | | low 80’s | | mid Feb. 2010 | | mid Aug. 2010 |
| | | | GOM | | Brazil prep, mobe, acceptance | | DODI | | | | | | mid Aug. 2010 | | early Dec. 2010 |
| | | | Brazil | | Future Contract | | OGX | | one-year term + unpricedoption | | mid 130’s | | early Dec. 2010 | | early Dec. 2011 |
Ocean Titan (Note 8) | | 350’ IC | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Ankor Energy | | 90-day extension | | mid 60’s | | mid March 2010 | | mid Sept. 2010 |
| | | | GOM | | Intermediate Survey | | DODI | | | | | | early Dec. 2010 | | mid Dec. 2010 |
| | |
Note (6). | | Columbia —We received a notice from the operator claiming force majeure on the grounds that the moratorium and the subsequently implemented enhanced safety requirements implemented by the U.S. government render it unable to continue drilling activities in the GOM. We have notified the operator that we do not view the moratorium or the enhanced safety requirements as coming within the definition of force majeure under the contract, especially in light of the temporary injunction which immediately prohibited enforcement of the moratorium. We are currently in discussion with the operator in this regard. |
|
Note (7). | | Scepter —We received a notice from the operator claiming force majeure on the grounds that the moratorium and the subsequently implemented enhanced safety requirements implemented by the U.S. government would render it unable to obtain necessary permits to conduct drilling activities in the GOM. We have notified the operator that we do not view the moratorium or the enhanced safety requirements as coming within the definition of force majeure under the contract, especially in light of the temporary injunction which immediately prohibited enforcement of the moratorium. We are currently in discussion with the operator in this regard. |
|
Note (8). | | Titan— On June 15, 2010, we entered into a contract amendment which provides for a special permit standby rate of zero dollars ($0) during periods when the operator is unable to continue operations while waiting on certain regulatory permits. |
3
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
June 30, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominal | | | | | | | | | | Dayrate | | | | |
Rig Name | | WD* | | Location | | Status | | Operator | | Current Term | | ($000s) | | Start Date | | Est. End Date |
International Semisubmersibles (25) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mexico | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean New Era | | 1,500’ | | GOM | | Current Contract | | PEMEX | | 120-day extension | | low 180’s | | mid Feb. 2010 | | mid July 2010 |
| | | | GOM | | Special Survey | | DODI | | | | | | mid Nov. 2010 | | late Dec. 2010 |
North Sea/Mediterranean | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Nomad | | 1,200’ | | North Sea | | Current Contract | | SPD/Valiant | | one well | | mid 240’s | | mid April 2010 | | mid-July2010 |
| | | | North Sea | | Future Contract | | SPD/Wintershall | | two wells | | mid 240’s | | mid-July2010 | | lateAug. 2010 |
| | | | North Sea | | Future Contract | | SPD/Nautical | | one well + unpricedoption | | mid 240’s | | lateAug. 2010 | | midSept. 2010 |
Ocean Guardian | | 1,500’ | | Falkland Is. | | Current Contract | | AGR/Desire/ Rockhopper/ BHPB | | Seven firm wells plus three remainingoptionalwells | | mid 240’s | | mid Feb. 2010 | | late Sept. 2010 |
Ocean Princess | | 1,500’ | | North Sea | | Current Contract | | Talisman | | remainder Nomad contract | | upper 330’s | | late April 2010 | | early April 2011 |
| | | | North Sea | | Future Contract | | Talisman | | 120-day additional term | | mid 270’s | | early April 2011 | | late July 2011 |
Ocean Vanguard | | 1,500’ | | North Sea | | Special Survey | | DODI | | | | | | mid May 2010 | | late July 2010 |
| | | | North Sea | | Resume current contract | | Statoil | | three-year term + unpricedoption | | high 340’s | | late July2010 | | midJune 2013 |
Ocean Valiant (Note 9) | | 5,500’ | | Angola | | Current Contract | | Total | | two-year term | | low 620’s | | late Sept. 2009 | | late Sept. 2011 |
Australasia | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Patriot | | 1,500’ | | Australia | | Current Contract | | Apache | | two-year term + unpricedoption | | between 380-420 | | late Jan. 2009 | | late Jan. 2011 |
Ocean America | | 5,500’ | | Australia | | Current Contract | | Woodside | | two-year term | | mid 420’s | | late June2010 | | mid July2012 |
Ocean Epoch | | 3,000’ | | Australia | | Current Contract | | BHPB | | 550-day term | | low 350’s | | late Feb. 2009 | | late Aug. 2010 |
| | | | Australia | | Future Contract | | BHPB | | 90-day extension | | low 280’s | | late Aug. 2010 | | early Dec. 2010 |
| | | | Australia | | Future Contract | | Japan Energy | | one well | | mid 290’s | | early Dec. 2010 | | early Jan. 2011 |
Ocean General | | 3,000’ | | Vietnam | | Current Contract | | PVEP | | Approx. two-year term | | high 250’s | | mid Oct. 2008 | | mid Oct. 2010 |
Ocean Rover | | 8,000’ | | Malaysia | | Current Contract | | Murphy | | two-year term ext. | | low 450’s | | late Feb. 2009 | | early Oct. 2010 |
| | | | Indonesia | | Future Contract | | Murphy | | est. six months | | high 380’s | | early Oct. 2010 | | late March 2011 |
| | | | Malaysia | | Resume Current Contract | | Murphy | | resume two-year ext. | | low 450’s | | late March 2011 | | mid Aug. 2011 |
| | |
Note (9). | | Valiant— Dayrate subject to certain potential adjustments that are not expected to be material. |
4
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
June 30, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominal | | | | | | | | | | | | Dayrate | | | | |
Rig Name | | WD* | | Location | | Status | | Operator | | Current Term | | ($000s) | | Start Date | | Est. End Date |
Brazil | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Ambassador | | 1,100’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | OGX | | 3-year term + unpricedoption | | low 260’s | | mid Sept. 2009 | | mid Sept. 2012 |
Ocean Whittington | | 1,650’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot. 15% bonus) | | low 240’s | | late Jan. 2009 | | late Aug. 2012 |
Ocean Concord | | 2,300’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot. 15% bonus) | | upper 240’s | | early Jan. 2008 | | early Jan. 2013 |
Ocean Lexington | | 2,200’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | OGX | | 3-year term + unpricedoption | | mid 330’s | | early Feb. 2010 | | early Feb. 2013 |
Ocean Yorktown | | 2,850’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot. 15% bonus) | | low 250’s | | mid Aug. 2008 | | mid Aug. 2013 |
Ocean Yatzy | | 3,300’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot. 10% bonus) | | mid 250’s | | early Oct. 2009 | | early Oct. 2014 |
Ocean Quest | | 4,000’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | OGX | | 2-year term + unpricedoption | | low 340’s | | mid Feb. 2010 | | mid Feb. 2011 |
| | | | Brazil | | Resume Contract | | OGX | | 2-year term + unpricedoption | | low 420’s | | mid Feb. 2011 | | late Dec. 2011 |
Ocean Winner | | 4,000’ | | Brazil | | Special Survey | | DODI | | | | | | | 0 | | | mid May 2010 | | mid Sept. 2010 |
| | | | Brazil | | Resume Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot. 10% bonus) | | mid 280’s | | mid Sept. 2010 | | mid March 2015 |
Ocean Worker | | 4,000’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 6-year term (includes 50% of pot. 10% bonus) | | mid 280’s | | late Feb. 2009 | | late Feb. 2015 |
Ocean Alliance | | 5,250’ | | | | Intermediate Survey/Maint. | | DODI | | | 0 | | | | | | | early March 2010 | | late July 2010 |
| | | | Brazil | | Future Contract | | Petrobras | | 6-year term (includes 50% of pot. 15% bonus) | | mid 360’s | | lateJuly2010 | | late June 2016 |
Ocean Star | | 5,500’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | OGX | | one year + unpricedoption | | low 340’s | | mid Feb. 2010 | | mid Feb. 2011 |
Ocean Baroness | | 7,000’ | | Mobing | | Brazil prep, mobe, acceptance | | DODI | | | | | | | | | | mid March | | late Aug. 2010 |
| | | | Brazil | | Future Contract | | Petrobras | | three-year term (includes 50% of pot. 5% bonus) +optionto convert to 5 years during 1st year of operation | | mid 280’s | | late Aug. 2010 | | late Aug. 2013 |
Ocean Courage | | 10,000’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | five-year term (includes 50% of pot. 6% bonus) + unpricedoption | | | 400 - 410 | | | mid Feb. 2010 | | mid Feb. 2015 |
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
June 30, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominal | | | | | | | | | | Dayrate | | | | |
Rig Name | | WD* | | Location | | Status | | Operator | | Current Term | | ($000s) | | Start Date | | Est. End Date |
Brazil Cont. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Valor | | 10,000’ | | Mobe | | Brazil Mobe/Acceptance test | | DODI | | | | | | | | late June 2010 |
| | | | Brazil | | Future Contract | | Petrobras | | 3-year term +optionto convert to 5 years during 1st year | | low 450’s | | late June 2010 | | late June 2013 |
Drillship (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Clipper | | 7,875’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot. 5% bonus) | | mid 180’s | | mid Dec. 2005 | | mid Dec. 2010 |
| | | | Brazil | | Future Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot. 5% bonus) | | mid 310’s | | mid Dec. 2010 | | early March 2011 |
| | | | Brazil | | Upgrade for Petrobras | | DODI | | | | | | early March 2011 | | mid May 2011 |
| | | | Brazil | | Resume Future Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot. 5% bonus) | | mid 310’s | | mid May 2011 | | mid Dec. 2015 |
International Jack-ups (7) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Nugget | | 300’ IC | | Mexico | | Resume Current Contract | | Pemex | | 849 day term | | mid 130’s | | early Feb. 2010 | | late July 2011 |
Ocean Summit | | 300’ IC | | Mexico | | Current Contract | | Pemex | | 476 day term | | mid 130’s | | late July 2009 | | mid Nov. 2010 |
Ocean King | | 300’ IC | | Croatia | | Current Contract | | CROSCO | | standby for CROSCO | | low 50’s | | mid Nov. 2009 | | midJune 2010 |
Ocean Sovereign | | 300’ IC | | Indonesia | | Current Contract | | Kodeco | | five-month extension | | mid 70’s | | early May 2010 | | early Oct. 2010 |
Ocean Heritage | | 300’ IC | | Suez Gulf | | Current Contract | | SUCO | | option exercised | | low 60’s | | late July 2009 | | early July 2010 |
Ocean Spur | | 300’ IC | | Egypt | | Current Contract | | WEPCO | | one-year term | | mid 80’s | | late Aug. 2009 | | late Aug. 2010 |
| | | | Egypt | | Special Survey | | DODI | | | | | | late Aug. 2010 | | late Sept. 2010 |
Ocean Shield | | 350’ IC | | Australia | | Current Contract | | Apache | | one year | | low 100’s | | early May 2010 | | early May 2011 |
NOTES: | | Rig utilization rates can be adversely impacted by additional downtime due to unscheduled repairs and maintenance, weather conditions and other factors. |
An LOI is subject to customary conditions, including the execution of a definitive agreement and as such may not result in a binding contract.
Options are un-priced and any extension of contract is subject to mutually agreeable terms & conditions unless otherwise indicated.
Mobe revenues (if any) and mobe expenses are deferred, and generally are amortized over the life of the contract. GOM = Gulf of Mexico.
*Nominal Water Depth —Nominal water depth (in feet) reflects the current operating water depth capability for each drilling unit. In many cases, individual rigs are capable of drilling, or have drilled, in greater water depths. In all cases, floating rigs are capable of working successfully at greater depths than their nominal depth.
On a case by case basis, we may achieve a greater depth capacity by providing additional equipment.
On rig utilization, assume 95% for DP units, 96% for conventionally moored rigs, and 98% for jack-ups.
6
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
June 30, 2010
EXPECTED 2010 DOWNTIME — 10 DAYS OR LONGER* (Subject to Change)
# Days
| | | | | | | | | | |
Rig | | May Actual | | Est. Q2 Total | | Comments |
Shipyard — 5-Year Surveys/Maintenance | | | | | | | | | | |
New Era | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | 5-year survey, Q4 |
Spartan | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | 5-year survey, Q4 |
Spur | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | 5-year survey, Q3 |
Vanguard | | | 18 | | | | 48 | | | 5-year survey, Q2, Q3 (est.27days) |
Winner | | | 18 | | | | 48 | | | 5-year survey & steel replacement, Q2, Q3 (est. 80 days) |
Total 5-year Surveys | | | 36 | | | | 96 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Intermediate Surveys/Maintenance | | | | | | | | | | |
Alliance | | | 31 | | | | 91 | | | uwild and thruster changeout,Q3 (est. 25 days) |
Titan | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | uwild, Q4 |
Total Intermediate Surveys | | | 31 | | | | 91 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Contract Preparation/Mobe/Acceptance Testing | | | | | | | | | | |
America | | | 31 | | | | 76 | | | Cont. Contract prep, mobe, for Australia |
Baroness | | | 31 | | | | 91 | | | Cont. Brazil prep, mobe, accept. Test,Q3 (est. 54 days) |
Scepter | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | Contract prep, mobe for Brazil, Q3, Q4 (est. 108 days) |
Total Contract Prep. | | | 62 | | | | 167 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
New Rig Commissioning/Contract Prep | | | | | | | | | | |
Valor | | | 31 | | | | 86 | | | Prep, mobe, accept. test for Brazil |
Other Total | | | 31 | | | | 86 | | | |
Total | | | 160 | | | | 440 | | | |
| | |
* | | Does Not Include Cold or Hot Stacked Rigs (see following page for cold stacked units) |
Survey Costs: During surveys, normal opex applies, plus additional costs.
Mobe Costs: Amortized mobe costs are generally offset by amortized mobe revenues.
7
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
June 30, 2010
COLD STACKED RIGS: 5 — (3 jack-ups, 2 semisubmersibles)
| | | | | | | | |
|
Ocean Crusader | | 200’ MC | | GOM | | Stacked | | DODI |
Ocean Drake | | 200’ MC | | GOM | | Stacked | | DODI |
Ocean Champion | | 250’ MS | | GOM | | Stacked | | DODI |
Ocean Voyager | | 3,200’ | | GOM | | Stacked | | DODI |
Ocean Bounty | | 1,500’ | | Malaysia | | Stacked | | DODI |
Forward-Looking Statements: The rig status report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may project, indicate or any imply future results, events, performance or achievements, and may contain or be identified by the words “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “anticipate,” “estimate,“believe,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” “project,” “budget,” “forecast,” and similar expressions. Statements by the Company in the rig status report that contain forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the current term, future dayrates, future status, start and end dates and comments concerning future contracts and availability, letters of intent, utilization, surveys, downtime and other aspects of the Company’s drilling rigs, as well as statements concerning the moratorium on certain drilling activities in the GOM and enhanced safety requirements implemented by the U.S. government, related legal proceedings and outcomes thereof, the impact of these and related events on our operations and revenues, the effects of claims of force majeure and the outcomes of discussions with operators with regard thereto, rigs being upgraded or to be upgraded and the revised Ocean Victory contract. Such statements are inherently subject to a variety of assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or projected. A discussion of the risk factors that could impact these areas and the Company’s overall business and financial performance can be found in the Company’s reports and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These factors include, among others, general economic and business conditions, contract cancellations, customer bankruptcy, operating risks, casualty losses, industry fleet capacity, changes in foreign and domestic oil and gas exploration and production activity, competition, changes in foreign, political, social and economic conditions, regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations, customer preferences and various other matters, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. Given these concerns, investors and analysts should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the rig status report, and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement.