Exhibit 99.1
1
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
OCTOBER 21, 2010
RECENT COMMITMENTS — (See Body of Report For Contract Details/Date Changes and Other Information)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominal | | | | | | | | | | Dayrate | | | | |
Rig Name | | WD* | | Location | | Status | | Operator | | Current Term | | ($000s) | | Start Date | | Est. End Date |
Domestic Deepwater Semisubmersibles (2) (Note 1) | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Victory(Note 2) | | 5,500’ | | GOM | | Actively Marketing | | DODI | | Gap in contract | | | | | | |
| | | | GOM | | Contract Continuation | | ATP | | continue six-well minimum | | low 560’s | | early Nov. 2010 | | early Feb. 2011 |
| | | | GOM | | Actively Marketing | | DODI | | Gap in contract | | | | early Feb. 2011 | | early June 2011 |
| | | | GOM | | Contract Continuation | | ATP | | balance 1-year term | | low 540’s | | early June 2011 | | mid Aug. 2011 |
Ocean Monarch(Note 3) | | 10,000’ | | GOM | | Resume Original Contract | | Anadarko | | cont. four-year term | | low 440’s | | early August 2010 | | mid March 2013 |
Domestic 2nd Generation Semisubmersibles (1) (Note 1) | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Saratoga | | 2,200’ | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Taylor | | one-year extension + unpriced option | | 200-210 | | mid July 2010 | | late June 2011 |
Note (1).On October 11, 2010, the U.S. government lifted the ban on certain drilling activities in the GOM, which had been initially imposed on May 30, 2010 following the Macondo well blowout. All drilling in the GOM is now subject to compliance with enhanced safety requirements set forth in Notices to Lessees 2010-NO5 and 2010-NO6, both of which were implemented during the drilling ban. Additionally, all drilling in the GOM will be required to comply with the Interim Final Rule to Enhance Safety Measures for Energy Development on the Outer Continental Shelf (Drilling Safety Rule) and the Workplace Safety Rule on Safety and Environmental Management Systems, both of which were issued on September 30, 2010, once they become final. We continue to evaluate these new measures to ensure that our rigs and equipment are in full compliance, where applicable. Additional requirements could be forthcoming based on further recommendations by regulatory agencies investigating the Macondo incident. We are not able to predict the likelihood, nature or extent of additional rulemaking or when the interim rules, or any future rules, could become final. Nor are we able to predict when the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEM) will issue drilling permits to our customers. We are not able to predict the future impact of these events on our operations. Even with the drilling ban lifted, certain deepwater activites remain suspended until the BOEM resumes its regular permitting of those activities.
Note (2). —Victory— In regard solely to the ATP contract, and for a minimum of the first 240 days of the initial one-year contract period, Contract Drilling Revenue is to be recognized under normal GAAP accrual accounting at $540,000 per day, and additional contract dayrate of $20,000 is to recognized as interest income over applicable periods reflecting deferred payment plan. The contract calls for $75,000 per day of the $560,000 contract dayrate to be paid on a current basis and the remaining $485,000 per day to be paid pursuant to an overriding royalty interest structure, as discussed in the Company’s Form 8-K that was filed on June 3, 2009. Remaining days under the initial one-year contract period will be deferred until approximately the fourth quarter of 2011, when the contract provides that the rig will be utilized by the operator at a dayrate of $540,000 payable in cash.
Note (3). Monarch— On September 13, 2010, we received notice of termination of the drilling contract from the operator, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, on the grounds that the actions of certain governmental authorities, relating to a moratorium on certain drilling activities in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico following the Macondo well blowout, constitute a condition of force majeure under the drilling contract. The operator has also filed suit against us in U.S. District Court in Houston seeking a declaratory judgment that its termination of the drilling contract is warranted under the contract. We do not believe the events cited by the operator come within the definition of force majeure under the drilling contract, and we do not believe that the operator has the right to terminate the drilling contract on this basis. Although we cannot predict with certainty the results of any such litigation, and there can be no assurance as to its ultimate outcome, we intend to vigorously defend this litigation and challenge the operator’s attempt to terminate the drilling contract.
2
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
OCTOBER 21, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominal | | | | | | | | | | Dayrate | | | | |
Rig Name | | WD* | | Location | | Status | | Operator | | Current Term | | ($000s) | | Start Date | | Est. End Date |
Domestic Jack-ups (2) (Note 1) | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Columbia | | 250’ IC | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Chevron | | two wells | | high 40’s | | late July 2010 | | lateNov. 2010 |
Ocean Titan(Note 4) | | 350’ IC | | GOM | | Current Contract | | Ankor Energy | | one well extension + unpricedoption | | upper 60’s | | mid Oct. 2010 | | early Nov. 2010 |
| | | | GOM | | Intermediate Survey | | DODI | | | | | | early Dec. 2010 | | mid Dec. 2010 |
Note (4). Titan— On June 15, 2010, we entered into a contract amendment which provides for a special permit standby rate of zero dollars ($0) during periods when the operator is unable to continue operations while waiting on certain regulatory permits.
3
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
October 21, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominal | | | | | | | | | | Dayrate | | | | |
Rig Name | | WD* | | Location | | Status | | Operator | | Current Term | | ($000s) | | Start Date | | Est. End Date |
International Semisubmersibles (26) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North Sea/Mediterranean | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Nomad | | 1,200’ | | North Sea | | Current Contract | | SPD/Xcite | | one well + unpricedoption | | mid 240’s | | late Sept. 2010 | | early Dec. 2010 |
Ocean Guardian | | 1,500’ | | Falkland Is. | | Current Contract | | AGR/Desire/ Rockhopper | | Eight firm wells plustwo remainingoptionalwells | | mid 240’s | | mid Feb. 2010 | | late Jan. 2011 |
Ocean Princess | | 1,500’ | | North Sea | | Current Contract | | Talisman | | remainder Nomad contract | | upper 330’s | | late April 2010 | | early April 2011 |
| | | | North Sea | | Future Contract | | Talisman | | 120-day additional term | | mid 270’s | | early April 2011 | | late July 2011 |
Ocean Vanguard | | 1,500’ | | North Sea | | Current Contract | | Statoil | | three-year term + unpriced option | | high 340’s | | mid Aug. 2010 | | mid June 2013 |
Ocean Endeavor (Note 5) | | 10,000’ | | Egypt | | Current Contract | | Burullus | | one-year term + unpriced option | | mid 220’s | | mid July 2010 | | mid July 2011 |
Ocean Confidence | | 10,000’ | | Congo | | Current Contract | | Murphy | | interim contract for 90 days + unpricedoption | | low 390’s | | mid Sept. 2010 | | late Dec. 2010 |
| | | | Congo | | Future Contract | | Murphy | | one-well extension + unpricedoption | | low 390’s | | late Dec. 2010 | | late Jan. 2011 |
| | | | | | Mobe to GOM | | DODI | | | | | | late Jan. 2011 | | late Mar. 2011 |
| | | | GOM | | Future Contract | | Murphy | | resume interrupted contract + unpricedoption | | low 510’s | | late Mar. 2011 | | late Mar. 2012 |
Ocean Valiant (Note 6) | | 5,500’ | | Angola | | Current Contract | | Total | | two-year term | | low 620’s | | late Sept. 2009 | | late Sept. 2011 |
Note (5). Endeavor— In connection with the relocation of this rig out of the GOM pursuant to this contract, the previous operator paid an early termination fee of $31 million in order to satisfy certain contractual obligations.
Note (6). Valiant— Dayrate subject to certain potential adjustments that are not expected to be material.
4
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
October 21, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominal | | | | | | | | | | Dayrate | | | | |
Rig Name | | WD* | | Location | | Status | | Operator | | Current Term | | ($000s) | | Start Date | | Est. End Date |
Australasia | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Patriot | | 1,500’ | | Australia | | Current Contract | | Apache | | two-year term + unpricedoption | | between 380-420 | | late Jan. 2009 | | late Dec. 2010 |
Ocean America | | 5,500’ | | Australia | | Current Contract | | Woodside | | two-year term | | mid 420’s | | late June 2010 | | late May 2012 |
Ocean Epoch | | 3,000’ | | Australia | | Current Contract | | BHPB | | 90-day extension | | low 280’s | | mid Sept.2010 | | late Dec. 2010 |
| | | | Australia | | Future Contract | | Japan Energy | | one well | | mid 290’s | | late Dec. 2010 | | lateJan. 2011 |
Ocean General | | 3,000’ | | Vietnam | | Current Contract | | PVEP | | Approx. two-year term | | high 250’s | | mid Oct. 2008 | | mid Nov.2010 |
| | | | Indonesia | | Future Contract | | Premier Oil | | two wells + unpricedoption | | low 240’s | | midNov. 2010 | | midFeb. 2011 |
Ocean Rover | | 8,000’ | | Malaysia | | Current Contract | | Murphy | | two-year term ext. | | low 450’s | | late Feb. 2009 | | late Oct. 2010 |
| | | | Mobe | | Future Contract | | DODI | | | | | | late Oct. 2010 | | late Nov. 2010 |
| | | | Indonesia | | Future Contract | | Murphy | | est. six months | | high 370’s | | late Nov. 2010 | | mid May 2011 |
| | | | Mobe | | Future Contract | | DODI | | | | | | mid May 2011 | | mid June 2011 |
| | | | Malaysia | | Resume Current Contract | | Murphy | | resume two-year ext. | | low 450’s | | mid June 2011 | | early Oct. 2011 |
5
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
OCTOBER 21, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominal | | | | | | | | | | Dayrate | | | | |
Rig Name | | WD* | | Location | | Status | | Operator | | Current Term | | ($000s) | | Start Date | | Est. End Date |
Brazil | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Ambassador | | 1,100’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | OGX | | 3-year term + unpricedoption | | low 260’s | | mid Sept. 2009 | | mid Sept. 2012 |
Ocean Whittington | | 1,650’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot.15% bonus) | | low 240’s | | late Jan. 2009 | | late Aug. 2012 |
Ocean Concord | | 2,300’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot.15% bonus) | | upper 240’s | | early Jan. 2008 | | early Jan. 2013 |
Ocean Lexington | | 2,200’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | OGX | | 3-year term + unpricedoption | | mid 330’s | | early Feb. 2010 | | early Feb. 2013 |
Ocean Yorktown | | 2,850’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot.15% bonus) | | low 250’s | | mid Aug. 2008 | | mid Aug. 2013 |
Ocean Yatzy | | 3,300’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot.10% bonus) | | mid 250’s | | early Oct. 2009 | | early Oct. 2014 |
Ocean Quest | | 4,000’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | OGX | | 2-year term + unpricedoption | | low 340’s | | mid Feb. 2010 | | mid Feb. 2011 |
| | | | Brazil | | Resume Contract | | OGX | | 2-year term + unpricedoption | | low 420’s | | mid Feb. 2011 | | late Dec. 2011 |
Ocean Winner | | 4,000’ | | Brazil | | Resume Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot.10% bonus) | | mid 280’s | | mid Oct. 2010 | | mid March 2015 |
Ocean Worker | | 4,000’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 6-year term (includes 50% of pot.10% bonus) | | mid 280’s | | late Feb. 2009 | | late Feb. 2015 |
Ocean Alliance | | 5,250’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 6-year term (includes 50% of pot.15% bonus) | | mid 360’s | | late July 2010 | | late June 2016 |
Ocean Star | | 5,500’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | OGX | | one year + unpricedoption | | low 340’s | | mid Feb. 2010 | | mid Feb. 2011 |
Ocean Baroness | | 7,000’ | | Brazil | | Future Contract | | Petrobras | | three-year term (includes 50% of pot. 5% bonus) +optionto convert to 5 years during 1st year of operation | | mid 280’s | | early Sept. 2010 | | early Sept. 2013 |
Ocean Courage | | 10,000’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | five-year term (includes 50% of pot. 6% bonus) + unpriced option | | 400 - 410 | | mid Feb. 2010 | | mid Feb. 2015 |
6
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
OCTOBER 21, 2010
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nominal | | | | | | | | | | Dayrate | | | | |
Rig Name | | WD* | | Location | | Status | | Operator | | Current Term | | ($000s) | | Start Date | | Est. End Date |
Brazil Cont. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Valor | | 10,000’ | | Brazil | | Acceptance test | | DODI | | | | | | | | late Oct. 2010 |
| | | | Brazil | | Future Contract | | Petrobras | | 3-year term +optionto convert to 5 years during 1st year | | low 450’s | | lateOct. 2010 | | lateOct. 2013 |
Drillship (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Clipper | | 7,875’ | | Brazil | | Current Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot.5% bonus) | | mid 180’s | | mid Dec. 2005 | | mid Dec. 2010 |
| | | | Brazil | | Future Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot. 5% bonus) | | mid 310’s | | mid Dec. 2010 | | early March 2011 |
| | | | Brazil | | Upgrade for Petrobras | | DODI | | | | | | early March 2011 | | mid May 2011 |
| | | | Brazil | | Resume Future Contract | | Petrobras | | 5-year term (includes 50% of pot. 5% bonus) | | mid 310’s | | mid May 2011 | | mid Dec. 2015 |
International Jack-ups (7) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Nugget | | 300’ IC | | Mexico | | Resume Current Contract | | Pemex | | 849 day term | | mid 130’s | | early Feb. 2010 | | late July 2011 |
Ocean Summit | | 300’ IC | | Mexico | | Current Contract | | Pemex | | 476 day term | | mid 130’s | | late July 2009 | | mid Nov. 2010 |
Ocean Scepter | | 350’ IC | | Brazil | | Standby/acceptance testing | | DODI | | | | | | mid July 2010 | | early Dec. 2010 |
| | | | Brazil | | Future Contract | | OGX | | one-year term + unpricedoption | | mid 130’s | | early Dec. 2010 | | early Dec. 2011 |
Ocean King | | 300’ IC | | Montenegro | | Actively Marketing | | DODI | | | | | | | | |
Ocean Sovereign | | 300’ IC | | Indonesia | | Current Contract | | Kodeco | | six-month extension | | mid 70’s | | early May 2010 | | late Nov. 2010 |
Ocean Heritage | | 300’ IC | | Suez Gulf | | Current Contract | | SUCO | | six-month extension | | high 50’s | | late July 2010 | | mid Jan. 2011 |
Ocean Spur | | 300’ IC | | Egypt | | Special Survey | | DODI | | | | | | mid Sept. 2010 | | late Oct. 2010 |
| | | | Egypt | | Future Contract | | WEPCO | | one-year extension | | mid 60’s | | late Oct. 2010 | | late Oct. 2011 |
NOTES: Rig utilization rates can be adversely impacted by additional downtime due to unscheduled repairs and maintenance, weather conditions and other factors.
An LOI is subject to customary conditions, including the execution of a definitive agreement and as such may not result in a binding contract.
Options are un-priced and any extension of contract is subject to mutually agreeable terms & conditions unless otherwise indicated.
Mobe revenues (if any) and mobe expenses are deferred, and generally are amortized over the life of the contract. GOM=Gulf of Mexico.
*Nominal Water Depth —Nominal water depth (in feet) reflects the current operating water depth capability for each drilling unit. In many cases, individual rigs are capable of drilling, or have drilled, in greater water depths. In all cases, floating rigs are capable of working successfully at greater depths than their nominal depth. On a case by case basis, we may achieve a greater depth capacity by providing additional equipment.
On rig utilization, assume 95% for DP units, 96% for conventionally moored rigs, and 98% for jack-ups.
7
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
OCTOBER 21, 2010
EXPECTED 2010 DOWNTIME — 10 DAYS OR LONGER* (Subject to Change)
YTD Total thru Q3 =1,897
# Days
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rig | | Sept. Actual | | | Q3 Actual | | | Q4 Est. | | | Comments |
Shipyard — 5-Year Surveys/Maintenance | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Spur | | | 22 | | | | 22 | | | | 25 | | | 5-year survey |
Vanguard | | | | | | | 54 | | | | 0 | | | 5-year survey |
Winner | | | 30 | | | | 92 | | | | 60 | | | 5-year survey & steel replacement |
Total 5-year Surveys | | | 52 | | | | 168 | | | | 85 | | | |
Intermediate Surveys/Maintenance | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alliance | | | 0 | | | | 24 | | | | 0 | | | Uwild and thruster changeout |
Titan | | | 0 | | | | 18 | | | | 10 | | | Maintenance; Uwild |
Total Intermediate Surveys | | | 0 | | | | 42 | | | | 10 | | | |
Contract Preparation/Mobe/Acceptance Testing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Confidence | | | 19 | | | | 81 | | | | 0 | | | 5-year survey, prep, mobe for Congo |
Baroness | | | 8 | | | | 70 | | | | 0 | | | Cont. Brazil prep, mobe, accept. Test |
Endeavor | | | 30 | | | | 61 | | | | 17 | | | Mobe to Egypt |
Scepter | | | 30 | | | | 80 | | | | 68 | | | Contract prep, mobe for Brazil |
Total Contract Prep. | | | 87 | | | | 292 | | | | 85 | | | |
New Rig Commissioning/Contract Prep/Maintenance/Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Worker | | | 0 | | | | 19 | | | | 0 | | | Maintenance |
Courage | | | 22 | | | | 54 | | | | 0 | | | Maintenance |
Clipper | | | 17 | | | | 21 | | | | 0 | | | |
Valiant | | | 5 | | | | 29 | | | | 0 | | | Maintenance |
Yatzy | | | 13 | | | | 13 | | | | 14 | | | Maintenance |
America | | | 0 | | | | 15 | | | | 0 | | | Maintenance |
Valor | | | 30 | | | | 92 | | | | 31 | | | Prep, mobe, accept. test for Brazil |
Other Total | | | 87 | | | | 243 | | | | 45 | | | |
Total | | | 226 | | | | 745 | | | | 225 | | | |
| | |
*Does Not Include Cold or Hot Stacked Rigs (see following page for cold stacked units) |
|
Survey Costs: During surveys, normal opex applies, plus additional costs. |
|
Mobe Costs: Amortized mobe costs are generally offset by amortized mobe revenues. |
8
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. RIG STATUS REPORT AS OF
OCTOBER 21, 2010
| | | | | | | | |
|
COLD STACKED RIGS: 7 — (4 jack-ups, 3 semisubmersibles) |
|
Ocean Crusader | | 200’ MC | | GOM | | Stacked | | DODI |
|
Ocean Drake | | 200’ MC | | GOM | | Stacked | | DODI |
|
Ocean Champion | | 250’ MS | | GOM | | Stacked | | DODI |
|
Ocean Spartan | | 300’IC | | GOM | | Stacked | | DODI |
|
Ocean Voyager | | 3,200’ | | GOM | | Stacked | | DODI |
|
Ocean New Era | | 1,500’ | | GOM | | Stacked | | DODI |
|
Ocean Bounty | | 1,500’ | | Malaysia | | Stacked | | DODI |
|
Forward-Looking Statements: The rig status report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may project, indicate or imply future results, events, performance or achievements, and may contain or be identified by the words “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” believe,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” “project,” “budget,” “forecast,” and similar expressions. Statements by the Company in the rig status report that contain forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the current term, future dayrates, future status, start and end dates, and comments concerning future contracts and availability, letters of intent, utilization, surveys, downtime and other aspects of the Company’s drilling rigs, as well as statements concerning the moratorium on, or suspension of, certain drilling activities in the GOM and enhanced safety requirements implemented by the U.S. government, related legal proceedings and outcomes thereof, the impact of these and related events on our operations and revenues, the effects of claims of force majeure and the outcomes of discussions with operators with regard thereto, rigs being upgraded or to be upgraded and the revised Ocean Victory contract. Such statements are inherently subject to a variety of assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or projected. A discussion of the risk factors that could impact these areas and the Company’s overall business and financial performance can be found in the Company’s reports and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These factors include, among others, general economic and business conditions, contract cancellations, customer bankruptcy, operating risks, casualty losses, industry fleet capacity, changes in foreign and domestic oil and gas exploration and production activity, competition, changes in foreign, political, social and economic conditions, regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations, customer preferences and various other matters, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. Given these concerns, investors and analysts should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the rig status report, and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement.