Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | a. Principles of Consolidation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
Investments in which the Company has at least a 20%, but not more than a 50% interest are generally accounted for under the equity method. Investment interests below 20% are generally accounted for under the cost method, except if the Company could exercise significant influence, the investment would be accounted for under the equity method. The Company’s judgment regarding the level of influence over each equity method investment includes considering key factors such as the Company’s ownership interest, representation on the board of directors, participation in policy-making decisions and material intercompany transactions. The Company has an investment interest below 20% which is accounted for under the equity method. The Company includes its proportionate share of the net income or loss of equity-method investees in its consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. For additional information, refer to Note 15, “Equity Investments”. |
Discontinued Operations, Policy [Policy Text Block] | b. Discontinued Operations |
|
In July 2014, the Company committed to a plan to sell substantially all of the assets of its Reno Business, and the sale of this business was completed in October 2014. The sale of this non-core business is expected to increase the Company’s ability to fund key investments to broaden its growing intellectual property portfolio and to bring to market new products. The assets and liabilities of the Reno Business have been reclassified as held for sale and its operations are classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented in this report. Depreciation and amortization have been eliminated from discontinued operations from the date the Company committed to the plan to sell the Reno Business. In the statements of cash flows, the cash flows of discontinued operations are separately classified and aggregated. |
|
Discontinued operations also includes accruals and related costs for the Company’s estimated liability to settle its ongoing indemnification matters with Johnson Matthey (“JM”) associated with the sale of Applied Utility Systems, Inc. (“AUS”), a former subsidiary of the Company, in 2009. |
|
For additional information, refer to Note 18, “Discontinued Operations”. |
|
All discussions and amounts in the consolidated financial statements and related notes for all periods presented relate to continuing operations only, unless otherwise noted. |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | c. Concentration of Risk |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, one automotive original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) customer within the Catalyst segment accounted for 52% and 41%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues. This customer accounted for 50% and 26% of the Company’s accounts receivable at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
|
For the periods presented below, certain vendors accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s raw material purchases as follows: |
|
| | | | Years Ended | |
| | | | December 31, | |
Vendor | | Supplies | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
A | | Substrates | | 27% | | 18% | |
B | | Substrates | | 14% | | 14% | |
C | | Catalysts | | 10% | | 15% | |
D | | Rare Earth Materials | | 9% | | 12% | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | d. Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions, including those related to impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets, stock-based compensation, the fair value of financial instruments including warrants, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, taxes and contingent and accrued liabilities. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors, including the current economic environment, which it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Estimates and assumptions are adjusted when facts and circumstances dictate. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. Management believes that the estimates are reasonable. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | e. Cash |
|
Cash consists of cash balances on hand and on deposit at banks. Cash on deposit at banks at times may exceed the FDIC limits. The Company believes no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to these cash balances. |
Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block] | f. Accounts Receivable |
|
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Accounts receivable are presented net of a reserve for doubtful accounts of $0.3 million and $0.4 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience and past due balances over 90 days that are reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company does not have any off balance sheet credit exposure related to its customer. |
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block] | g. Inventories |
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (FIFO method) or market (net realizable value). Finished goods inventory includes materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. The Company establishes provisions for inventory that is obsolete or when quantities on hand are in excess of estimated forecasted demand. The creation of such provisions results in a write-down of inventory to net realizable value and a charge to cost of sales. |
|
The Company’s inventory includes precious metals (platinum, palladium and rhodium) for use in the manufacturing of catalysts. The precious metals are valued at the lower of cost or market, consistent with the Company’s other inventory. |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | h. Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment is capitalized at cost and is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is determined using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the various asset classes. Machinery and equipment are depreciated over 2 to 10 years; furniture and fixtures, computer hardware and software and vehicles are depreciated over 2 to 5 years. Property and equipment held under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of estimated useful lives or the lease term. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred and major replacements or betterments are capitalized. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | i. Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
|
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price of an acquired entity over the fair value of net identified tangible and intangible assets acquired and is recorded in the reporting unit (operating segment or one level below operating segment) that is expected to benefit from the business combination. Goodwill is not amortized, but rather tested for impairment at least annually or more often whenever events or circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. The Company performs its annual impairment test as of October 31. |
|
Goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level using a two-step impairment test. The first step is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value, a second step is performed in order to determine the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. Prior to performing the two-step impairment test, the Company may make a qualitative assessment of the likelihood of goodwill impairment in order to determine whether a detailed quantitative analysis is required. |
|
The Company’s Engine Control Systems reporting unit, which is within its Heavy Duty Diesel Systems reporting segment, contains all of the Company’s allocated goodwill. The Company performed Step 1 of the annual impairment test as of October 31, 2014 and determined that the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit (as determined using income and market approaches) was substantially greater than the carrying amount of the respective reporting unit, including goodwill, and Step 2 was not necessary; therefore, there was no impairment to the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill. The Company has recorded no impairment charges to date for this goodwill. The Company also determined that no subsequent events through December 31, 2014 triggered additional impairment testing; however, it is reasonably possible that future impairment tests may result in a different conclusion for the goodwill of the Engine Control Systems reporting unit. The estimate of fair value of the reporting units is sensitive to certain factors including but not limited to the following: movements in the Company’s share price, changes in discount rates and its cost of capital, growth of the reporting unit’s revenue, cost structure of the reporting unit, successful completion of research and development and customer acceptance of new products, expected changes in emissions regulations and approval of the reporting unit’s product by regulatory agencies. |
|
The Company’s intangible assets consist of trade names, acquired patents and technology, and customer relationships and have finite lives. Intangible assets are carried at cost, less accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed on a straight-line or accelerated basis over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, ranging from 4 to 20 years. |
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | j. Long Lived Assets |
|
Assets such as property and equipment and amortizable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when the sum of the expected undiscounted future net cash flows of an asset or asset group is less than its carrying amount and is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds its fair value. |
Derivatives, Policy [Policy Text Block] | k. Warrants and Derivative Liabilities |
|
The Company accounts for the issuance of Company derivative equity instruments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815-40 “Derivative and Hedging”. The Company reviews common stock purchase warrants at each balance sheet date based upon the characteristics and provision of each particular instrument and classifies them on the balance sheet as: |
|
· Equity if they (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement, or (ii) give the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in the Company’s own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement), or as |
|
· Liabilities if they (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net-cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the Company’s control), or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement of net-share settlement). |
|
The Company assesses classification of common stock purchase warrants and other freestanding derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between assets and liabilities and equity is required. |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | l. Income Taxes |
|
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance against deferred tax assets is required if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. |
|
The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change occurs. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefit in income tax expense. |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | m. Revenue Recognition |
|
Revenues are derived primarily from the sale of products. The Company generally recognizes revenue when products are shipped and the customer takes ownership and assumes risk of loss, collection of the relevant receivable is reasonably assured, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed or determinable. There are certain customers where risk of loss transfers at destination point and revenue is recognized when product is delivered to the destination. For these customers, revenue is recognized upon receipt at the customer’s warehouse. When terms of sale include subjective customer acceptance criteria, the Company defers revenue until the acceptance criteria are met. The determination of whether or not the customer acceptance terms are perfunctory or inconsequential impacts the amount and timing of the revenue recognized. |
Cost of Sales, Policy [Policy Text Block] | n. Cost of Revenue |
|
Cost of revenue includes direct material costs and factory labor as well as factory overhead expense. Indirect factory expense includes the costs of freight (inbound and outbound for direct materials and finished goods, respectively), purchasing and receiving, inspection, testing, warehousing, utilities and depreciation of facilities and equipment utilized in the production and distribution of products. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses, Policy [Policy Text Block] | o. Selling, General and Administrative Expense |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense includes the salary and benefits for sales, marketing and administrative staff as well as samples provided at no-cost to customers, marketing materials, travel, legal, accounting and tax consulting. Also included is any depreciation related to assets utilized in selling, general and administrative functions as well as amortization of acquired intangible assets. |
Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block] | p. Research and Development |
|
Research and development costs are generally expensed as incurred. These expenses include the salary and benefits for the research and development staff as well as travel, research materials, testing and legal expense related to patenting intellectual property. Also included is any depreciation related to assets utilized in the development of new products. |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | q. Stock-Based Compensation |
|
Equity awards consist of stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The Company measures the compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognizes it on a straight-line basis over the service period for awards expected to vest, which is generally three years. |
|
The Company measures the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and certain assumptions, including the expected life of the stock options, an expected forfeiture rate and the expected volatility of its common stock. The fair value of RSUs is based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. |
Standard Product Warranty, Policy [Policy Text Block] | r. Product Warranty |
|
The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties in cost of sales, at the time product revenue is recognized. Warranty costs are estimated primarily using historical warranty information in conjunction with current engineering assessments applied to the Company’s expected repair or replacement costs. |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | s. Foreign Currency |
|
The functional currency of the Heavy Duty Diesel Systems division’s Engine Control Systems Limited subsidiary in Canada is the Canadian dollar, while that of its subsidiary Engine Control Systems Europe AB in Sweden is the Swedish krona and the division’s Clean Diesel Technologies Limited U.K. subsidiary, is the British pound sterling. The functional currency of the Catalyst division’s Japanese branch office and Asian investment is the Japanese Yen. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the foreign locations are translated into U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates. Revenue and expense accounts are translated at the average exchange rates for the period. The resulting foreign currency exchange adjustments are charged or credited directly to other comprehensive income or loss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Unrealized foreign currency exchange gains and losses on certain intercompany transactions that are of a long-term investment nature (i.e. settlement is not planned or anticipated in the foreseeable future) are also recorded in other comprehensive income or loss in stockholders’ equity. Accumulated other comprehensive loss contained only foreign currency translation adjustments as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
|
The Company has exposure to multiple currencies. The primary exposure is between the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, the Euro, British pound sterling and Swedish krona. Gains and losses arising from transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. Gains and losses arising from transactions denominated in foreign currencies are primarily related to inter-company loans that have been determined to be temporary in nature, cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable denominated in non-functional currencies. |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | t. Net Loss per Share |
|
Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares. Dilutive potential common shares include employee stock options, RSUs, warrants and debt that are convertible into the Company’s common stock. |
|
Diluted net loss per share excludes certain dilutive potential common shares outstanding as their effect is anti-dilutive. Because the Company incurred net losses in the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the effect of potentially dilutive securities has been excluded in the computation of net loss per share as their impact would be anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive common stock equivalents excluded were 2.3 million and 2.6 million shares during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block] | u. Fair Value Measurements |
|
Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset and liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a fair value hierarchy has been established that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows: |
|
· Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
|
· Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable including quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and |
|
· Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing. |
|
The Company records its liability-classified warrants at fair value in accordance with the fair value measurement framework. The valuation inputs hierarchy classification for the warrant liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis is summarized as follows (in thousands): |
|
Warrant Liability | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
31-Dec-14 | | - | | - | | $ | 1,474 |
31-Dec-13 | | - | | - | | $ | 939 |
|
The following is a reconciliation of the warrant liability measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs (in thousands): |
|
| | | |
Years Ended | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| December 31, | | |
| | | | | |
2014 | 2013 | | |
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 939 | | $ | 10 | | |
Issuance of common stock warrants | | 2,978 | | | 749 | | |
Exercise of common stock warrants | | -2,949 | | | - | | |
Remeasurement of common stock warrants | | 506 | | | 180 | | |
Balance at end of period | $ | 1,474 | | $ | 939 | | |
|
For additional information regarding the liability-classified warrants, refer to Note 11, “Warrants”. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | v. Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which the determination of fair value is practicable. The fair values of the Company’s cash, trade accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate carrying values due to the short maturity of these instruments. The fair value of borrowings under the line of credit approximates their carrying value due to the variable interest rates. The fair value of shareholder notes payable, calculated using level 3 inputs, including a Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value the debt’s conversion factor and a net present value model, was $7.7 million and $7.5 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | w. Reclassifications |
|
Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These changes had no impact on the previously reported consolidated results of operations or stockholders' equity. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | x. Recently Issued Accounting Guidance |
|
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08, "Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity". ASU 2014-08 raises the threshold for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. The Company has not elected to early adopt, and it does not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-08 to be material to its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers". ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in "Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)". ASU 2014-09 requires entities to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. ASU 2014-09 provides for either full retrospective adoption or a modified retrospective adoption by which it is applied only to the most current period presented. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. ASU 2014-15 defines management's responsibility to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. It is effective for annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim reporting periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-15 on its consolidated financial statements. |