Fair Value Disclosures | Fair Value Disclosures The following is a summary of our financial instruments, trading liabilities and long-term debt that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding Investments at fair value based on NAV (within trading assets) of $20.2 million and $24.3 million , respectively, by level within the fair value hierarchy at December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands): December 31, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Counterparty and Cash Collateral Netting (1) Total Assets: Trading assets, at fair value: Corporate equity securities $ 2,975,463 $ 60,300 $ 22,270 $ — $ 3,058,033 Corporate debt securities — 3,261,300 26,036 — 3,287,336 Collateralized debt obligations and collateralized loan obligations — 139,166 42,184 — 181,350 U.S. government and federal agency securities 1,269,230 39,443 — — 1,308,673 Municipal securities — 710,513 — — 710,513 Sovereign obligations 1,381,552 1,035,907 — — 2,417,459 Residential mortgage-backed securities — 1,453,294 26,077 — 1,479,371 Commercial mortgage-backed securities — 508,115 12,419 — 520,534 Other asset-backed securities — 217,111 61,129 — 278,240 Loans and other receivables — 1,620,581 47,304 — 1,667,885 Derivatives 165,396 3,323,278 9,295 (3,318,481 ) 179,488 Investments at fair value — 946 329,944 — 330,890 FXCM term loan — — 72,800 — 72,800 Total trading assets, excluding investments at fair value based on NAV $ 5,791,641 $ 12,369,954 $ 649,458 $ (3,318,481 ) $ 15,492,572 Available for sale securities: Corporate equity securities $ 88,486 $ — $ — $ — $ 88,486 U.S. government securities 552,805 — — — 552,805 Residential mortgage-backed securities — 34,561 — — 34,561 Commercial mortgage-backed securities — 5,870 — — 5,870 Other asset-backed securities — 34,839 — — 34,839 Total available for sale securities $ 641,291 $ 75,270 $ — $ — $ 716,561 Liabilities: Trading liabilities: Corporate equity securities $ 1,721,267 $ 32,122 $ 48 $ — $ 1,753,437 Corporate debt securities — 1,688,825 522 — 1,689,347 U.S. government and federal agency securities 1,430,737 — — — 1,430,737 Sovereign obligations 1,216,643 956,992 — — 2,173,635 Commercial mortgage-backed securities — — 105 — 105 Loans — 1,148,824 3,486 — 1,152,310 Derivatives 249,361 3,480,506 16,041 (3,490,514 ) 255,394 Total trading liabilities $ 4,618,008 $ 7,307,269 $ 20,202 $ (3,490,514 ) $ 8,454,965 Short-term borrowings $ — $ 23,324 $ — $ — $ 23,324 Long-term debt $ — $ 606,956 $ — $ — $ 606,956 December 31, 2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Counterparty and Cash Collateral Netting (1) Total Assets: Trading assets, at fair value: Corporate equity securities $ 2,522,977 $ 92,839 $ 21,739 $ — $ 2,637,555 Corporate debt securities — 2,675,020 25,005 — 2,700,025 Collateralized debt obligations and collateralized loan obligations — 54,306 54,354 — 108,660 U.S. government and federal agency securities 2,389,397 56,726 — — 2,446,123 Municipal securities — 708,469 27,257 — 735,726 Sovereign obligations 1,432,556 990,492 — — 2,423,048 Residential mortgage-backed securities — 960,494 38,772 — 999,266 Commercial mortgage-backed securities — 296,405 20,580 — 316,985 Other asset-backed securities — 63,587 40,911 — 104,498 Loans and other receivables — 1,557,233 81,872 — 1,639,105 Derivatives 3,825 4,616,822 6,429 (4,255,998 ) 371,078 Investments at fair value — — 314,359 — 314,359 FXCM term loan — — 164,500 — 164,500 Total trading assets, excluding investments at fair value based on NAV $ 6,348,755 $ 12,072,393 $ 795,778 $ (4,255,998 ) $ 14,960,928 Available for sale securities: Corporate equity securities $ 79,425 $ — $ — $ — $ 79,425 Corporate debt securities — 179 — — 179 U.S. government securities 174,933 — — — 174,933 Residential mortgage-backed securities — 19,133 — — 19,133 Commercial mortgage-backed securities — 8,337 — — 8,337 Other asset-backed securities — 19,042 — — 19,042 Total available for sale securities $ 254,358 $ 46,691 $ — $ — $ 301,049 Liabilities: Trading liabilities: Corporate equity securities $ 1,593,548 $ 16,806 $ 313 $ — $ 1,610,667 Corporate debt securities — 1,718,424 523 — 1,718,947 U.S. government and federal agency securities 976,497 — — — 976,497 Sovereign obligations 1,375,590 1,253,754 — — 2,629,344 Loans — 801,977 378 — 802,355 Derivatives 2,566 4,867,586 9,870 (4,229,213 ) 650,809 Total trading liabilities $ 3,948,201 $ 8,658,547 $ 11,084 $ (4,229,213 ) $ 8,388,619 Other secured financings $ — $ 41,350 $ 418 $ — $ 41,768 Long-term debt $ — $ 248,856 $ — $ — $ 248,856 (1) Represents counterparty and cash collateral netting across the levels of the fair value hierarchy for positions with the same counterparty. The following is a description of the valuation basis, including valuation techniques and inputs, used in measuring our financial assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis: Corporate Equity Securities • Exchange Traded Equity Securities: Exchange traded equity securities are measured based on quoted closing exchange prices, which are generally obtained from external pricing services, and are categorized within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy, otherwise they are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. To the extent these securities are actively traded, valuation adjustments are not applied. • Non-Exchange Traded Equity Securities : Non-exchange traded equity securities are measured primarily using broker quotations, pricing data from external pricing services and prices observed from recently executed market transactions and are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Where such information is not available, non-exchange traded equity securities are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and measured using valuation techniques involving quoted prices of or market data for comparable companies, similar company ratios and multiples (e.g., price/Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), price/book value), discounted cash flow analyses and transaction prices observed from subsequent financing or capital issuance by Jefferies. When using pricing data of comparable companies, judgment must be applied to adjust the pricing data to account for differences between the measured security and the comparable security (e.g., issuer market capitalization, yield, dividend rate, geographical concentration). • Equity Warrants: Non-exchange traded equity warrants are measured primarily using pricing data from external pricing services, prices observed from recently executed market transactions and broker quotations and are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Where such information is not available, non-exchange traded equity warrants are generally categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and are measured using the Black-Scholes model with key inputs impacting the valuation including the underlying security price, implied volatility, dividend yield, interest rate curve, strike price and maturity date. Corporate Debt Securities • Corporate Bonds: Corporate bonds are measured primarily using pricing data from external pricing services and broker quotations, where available, prices observed from recently executed market transactions and bond spreads or credit default swap spreads of the issuer adjusted for basis differences between the swap curve and the bond curve. Corporate bonds measured using these valuation methods are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. If broker quotes, pricing data or spread data is not available, alternative valuation techniques are used including cash flow models incorporating interest rate curves, single name or index credit default swap curves for comparable issuers and recovery rate assumptions. Corporate bonds measured using alternative valuation techniques are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and are a limited portion of our corporate bonds. • High Yield Corporate and Convertible Bonds: A significant portion of our high yield corporate and convertible bonds are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and are measured primarily using broker quotations and pricing data from external pricing services, where available, and prices observed from recently executed market transactions of Institutional size. Where pricing data is less observable, valuations are categorized within Level 3 and are based on pending transactions involving the issuer or comparable issuers, prices implied from an issuer’s subsequent financing or recapitalization, models incorporating financial ratios and projected cash flows of the issuer and market prices for comparable issuers. Collateralized Debt Obligations and Collateralized Loan Obligations CDOs and CLOs are measured based on prices observed from recently executed market transactions of the same or similar security or based on valuations received from third party brokers or data providers and are categorized within Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy depending on the observability and significance of the pricing inputs. Valuation that is based on recently executed market transactions of similar securities incorporates additional review and analysis of pricing inputs and comparability criteria, including, but not limited to, collateral type, tranche type, rating, origination year, prepayment rates, default rates, and loss severity. U.S. Government and Federal Agency Securities • U.S. Treasury Securities: U.S. Treasury securities are measured based on quoted market prices and categorized within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. • U.S. Agency Debt Securities: Callable and non-callable U.S. agency debt securities are measured primarily based on quoted market prices obtained from external pricing services and are generally categorized within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Municipal Securities Municipal securities are measured based on quoted prices obtained from external pricing services and are generally categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Sovereign Obligations Sovereign government obligations are measured based on quoted market prices obtained from external pricing services, where available, or recently executed independent transactions of comparable size. To the extent external price quotations are not available or recent transactions have not been observed, valuation techniques incorporating interest rate yield curves and country spreads for bonds of similar issuers, seniority and maturity are used to determine fair value of sovereign bonds or obligations. Sovereign government obligations are classified in Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, primarily based on the country of issuance. Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities • Agency Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities: Agency residential mortgage-backed securities include mortgage pass-through securities (fixed and adjustable rate), collateralized mortgage obligations and principal-only securities and are generally measured using market price quotations from external pricing services and categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. • Agency Residential Interest-Only and Inverse Interest-Only Securities ("agency Inverse IOs"): The fair value of agency Inverse IOs is estimated using expected future cash flow techniques that incorporate prepayment models and other prepayment assumptions to amortize the underlying mortgage loan collateral. We use prices observed from recently executed transactions to develop market-clearing spread and yield curve assumptions. Valuation inputs with regard to the underlying collateral incorporate weighted average coupon, loan-to-value, credit scores, geographic location, maximum and average loan size, originator, servicer, and weighted average loan age. Agency Inverse IOs are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. We also use vendor data in developing our assumptions, as appropriate. • Non-Agency Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities: The fair value of non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities is determined primarily using discounted cash flow methodologies and securities are categorized within Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy based on the observability and significance of the pricing inputs used. Performance attributes of the underlying mortgage loans are evaluated to estimate pricing inputs, such as prepayment rates, default rates and the severity of credit losses. Attributes of the underlying mortgage loans that affect the pricing inputs include, but are not limited to, weighted average coupon; average and maximum loan size; loan-to-value; credit scores; documentation type; geographic location; weighted average loan age; originator; servicer; historical prepayment, default and loss severity experience of the mortgage loan pool; and delinquency rate. Yield curves used in the discounted cash flow models are based on observed market prices for comparable securities and published interest rate data to estimate market yields. In addition, broker quotes, where available, are also referenced to compare prices primarily on interest-only securities. Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities • Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities: Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) project loan bonds are measured based on inputs corroborated from and benchmarked to observed prices of recent securitization transactions of similar securities with adjustments incorporating an evaluation of various factors, including prepayment speeds, default rates, and cash flow structures as well as the likelihood of pricing levels in the current market environment. Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS”) mortgage-backed securities are generally measured by using prices observed for recently executed market transactions to estimate market-clearing spread levels for purposes of estimating fair value. GNMA project loan bonds and FNMA DUS mortgage-backed securities are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. • Non-Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities: Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities are measured using pricing data obtained from external pricing services and prices observed from recently executed market transactions and are categorized within Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Other Asset-Backed Securities Other asset-backed securities include, but are not limited to, securities backed by auto loans, credit card receivables, student loans and other consumer loans and are categorized within Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Valuations are primarily determined using pricing data obtained from external pricing services and broker quotes and prices observed from recently executed market transactions. Loans and Other Receivables • Corporate Loans: Corporate loans categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are measured based on market price quotations where market price quotations from external pricing services are supported by transaction data. Corporate loans categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are measured based on price quotations that are considered to be less transparent, market prices for debt securities of the same creditor and estimates of future cash flow incorporating assumptions regarding creditor default and recovery rates and consideration of the issuer’s capital structure. • Participation Certificates in Agency Residential Loans: Valuations of participation certificates in agency residential loans are based on observed market prices of recently executed purchases and sales of similar loans. The loan participation certificates are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy given the observability and volume of recently executed transactions and availability of data provider pricing. • Project Loans and Participation Certificates in GNMA Project and Construction Loans: Valuations of participation certificates in GNMA project and construction loans are based on inputs corroborated from and benchmarked to observed prices of recent securitizations with similar underlying loan collateral to derive an implied spread. Securitization prices are adjusted to estimate the fair value of the loans incorporating an evaluation for various factors, including prepayment speeds, default rates and cash flow structures as well as the likelihood of pricing levels in the current market environment. The measurements are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy given the observability and volume of recently executed transactions. • Consumer Loans and Funding Facilities: Consumer and small business whole loans and related funding facilities are valued based on observed market transactions and incorporating valuation inputs including, but not limited to, delinquency and default rates, prepayment rates, borrower characteristics, loan risk grades and loan age. These assets are categorized within Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. • Escrow and Trade Claim Receivables: Escrow and trade claim receivables are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy where fair value is estimated based on reference to market prices and implied yields of debt securities of the same or similar issuers. Escrow and trade claim receivables are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy where fair value is based on recent trade activity in the same receivable. Derivatives • Listed Derivative Contracts: Listed derivative contracts that are actively traded are measured based on quoted exchange prices, broker quotes or vanilla option valuations models, such as Black-Scholes, using observable valuation inputs from the principal market. Exchange quotes and/or valuation inputs are generally obtained from external vendors and pricing services. Brokers quotes are validated directly through observable and tradeable quotes. Listed derivative contracts that use unadjusted exchange close prices are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. All other listed derivative contracts are generally categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. • Over-the-counter ("OTC") Derivative Contracts: OTC derivative contracts are generally valued using models, whose inputs reflect assumptions that we believe market participants would use in valuing the derivative in a current transaction. Inputs to valuation models are appropriately calibrated to market data. For many OTC derivative contracts, the valuation models do not involve material subjectivity as the methodologies do not entail significant judgment and the inputs to valuation models do not involve a high degree of subjectivity as the valuation model inputs are readily observable or can be derived from actively quoted markets. OTC derivative contracts are primarily categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy given the observability and significance of the inputs to the valuation models. Where significant inputs to the valuation are unobservable, derivative instruments are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. OTC options include OTC equity, foreign exchange, interest rate and commodity options measured using various valuation models, such as the Black-Scholes, with key inputs including the underlying security price, foreign exchange spot rate, commodity price, implied volatility, dividend yield, interest rate curve, strike price and maturity date. Discounted cash flow models are utilized to measure certain OTC derivative contracts including the valuations of our interest rate swaps, which incorporate observable inputs related to interest rate curves, valuations of our foreign exchange forwards and swaps, which incorporate observable inputs related to foreign currency spot rates and forward curves and valuations of our commodity swaps and forwards, which incorporate observable inputs related to commodity spot prices and forward curves. Discounted cash flow models are also utilized to measure certain variable funding note swaps, which are backed by CLOs and incorporate constant prepayment rate, constant default rate and loss severity assumptions. Credit default swaps include both index and single-name credit default swaps. External prices are available as inputs in measuring index credit default swaps and single-name credit default swaps. For commodity and equity total return swaps, market prices are generally observable for the underlying asset and used as the basis for measuring the fair value of the derivative contracts. Total return swaps executed on other underlyings are measured based on valuations received from external pricing services. • National Beef Derivatives: National Beef uses futures contracts in order to reduce its exposure associated with entering into firm commitments to purchase live cattle at prices determined prior to the delivery of the cattle as well as firm commitments to sell certain beef products at sales prices determined prior to shipment. The futures contracts and their related firm purchase commitments are accounted for at fair value, which are classified as Level 1 or Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. Certain firm commitments for live cattle purchases and all firm commitments for sales are treated as normal purchases and sales and therefore not marked to market. Fair values classified as Level 1 are calculated based on the quoted market prices of identical assets or liabilities compared to National Beef's cost of those same assets or liabilities. Fair values classified as Level 2 are calculated based on the difference between the contracted price for live cattle and the relevant quoted market price for live cattle futures. • Oil Futures Derivatives: Vitesse uses swaps and call and put options in order to reduce exposure to future oil price fluctuations. Vitesse accounts for the derivative instruments at fair value, which are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. Fair values classified as Level 2 are determined under the income valuation technique using an option-pricing model that is based on directly or indirectly observable inputs. Investments at Fair Value Investments at fair value included in Trading assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition include direct equity investments in private companies, which are measured at fair value using valuation techniques involving quoted prices of or market data for comparable companies, similar company ratios and multiples (e.g., price/EBITDA, price/book value), discounted cash flow analysis and transaction prices observed for subsequent financing or capital issuance by the company. Direct equity investments in private companies are categorized within Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Additionally, investments at fair value include investments in insurance contracts relating to Jefferies defined benefit plan in Germany. Fair value for the insurance contracts are determined using a third party and is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Investment in FXCM FXCM is a provider of online foreign exchange trading services. In January 2015, we entered into a credit agreement with FXCM, and provided FXCM a $300 million senior secured term loan due January 2017 (the term of which was subsequently extended to January 2019), with rights to a variable proportion of certain future distributions in connection with an FXCM sale of assets or certain other events, and to require a sale of FXCM beginning in January 2018. The loan had an initial interest rate of 10% per annum, increasing by 1.5% per annum each quarter, not to exceed 20.5% per annum. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , interest accrued at 20.5% per annum. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , we received $114.9 million of principal and interest from FXCM and $69.9 million of principal remained outstanding under the term loan as of December 31, 2017 . Through December 31, 2017 , we have received cumulatively $331.6 million of principal, interest and fees from our initial $279.0 million investment in FXCM. Through September 1, 2016, the total amount of our investment in FXCM was reported within Trading assets, at fair value in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, and unrealized and realized changes in value, including the component related to interest income on the loan, were included within Principal transactions in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We recorded gains (losses) in Principal transactions of $23.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 from our term loan and $(54.6) million and $491.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, from our term loan and related rights. On September 1, 2016, we, Global Brokerage Inc. ("Global Brokerage") and Global Brokerage Holdings entered into an agreement that amended the terms of our loan and associated rights. On November 10, 2017, the terms of our loan and associated rights were amended further. Among other changes, the amendments during 2016 and 2017 extended the repayment date of the remaining loan balance to January 2019; and exchanged our rights for a 50% voting interest in FXCM and up to 75% of all distributions. Through these amendments, we also gained the right to appoint three of six board members for FXCM. We have the right, as does Global Brokerage Holdings, the owner of the remaining 50% of FXCM voting interest that is not held by Leucadia, to require a sale of FXCM beginning in January 2018. Distributions to Leucadia under the amended agreements are now: 100% until amounts due under the loan are repaid; 50% of the next $350 million ; then 90% of the next $600 million ; and 60% of all amounts thereafter. Through the amendment on September 1, 2016 we gained the ability to significantly influence FXCM through our seats on the board of directors. As a result, we classify our equity investment in FXCM in our December 31, 2017 and 2016 Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as Loans to and investments in associated companies. We account for our equity interest on a one month lag. As the amendments only extended the maturity of the term loan, we continue to use the fair value option and classify our term loan within Trading assets, at fair value. During February 2017, Global Brokerage Holdings and FXCM's U.S. subsidiary, Forex Capital Markets LLC ("FXCM U.S.") settled complaints filed by the National Futures Association ("NFA") and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") against FXCM U.S. and certain of its principals relating to matters that occurred between 2010 and 2014. As part of the settlements, FXCM U.S. withdrew from business and sold FXCM U.S.'s customer accounts. FXCM also implemented a restructuring plan that included the termination of approximately 22% of its global workforce. The proceeds from the sale of the U.S. accounts, net of closure and severance costs, as well as regulatory capital released after the sale, has been used to pay down the Leucadia term loan. FXCM is considered a variable interest entity ("VIE") and our term loan and equity ownership are variable interests. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of FXCM because we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact FXCM’s performance. Therefore, we do not consolidate FXCM and we account for our equity interest under the equity method as an investment in an associated company. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with FXCM is limited to the carrying value of the term loan ( $72.8 million ) and the investment in associated company ( $158.9 million ), which totaled $231.7 million at December 31, 2017 . We estimate the fair value of our term loan by using a valuation model with inputs including management’s assumptions concerning the amount and timing of expected cash flows, the loan’s implied credit rating and effective yield. Because of these inputs and the degree of judgment involved, we have categorized our term loan within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements As described further in Note 10, in the first quarter of 2017 we engaged an independent valuation firm to assist management in estimating the fair value of our equity investment in FXCM. Our first quarter estimate of fair value was based on a discounted cash flow and comparable public company analysis and is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The discounted cash flow valuation model used inputs including management's projections of future FXCM cash flows and a discount rate of approximately 15% . The comparable public company model used market data for comparable companies including a price to EBITDA multiple of 5.4 and a price to revenue multiple of 1.5 . The estimated fair value of our equity investment in FXCM was $186.7 million , which was $130.2 million lower than the carrying value at the end of the first quarter 2017. As a result, an impairment charge of $130.2 million was recorded in Income (loss) related to associated companies in the first quarter of 2017. In 2015, we recorded impairment charges in Selling, general and other expenses of $27.7 million , primarily related to a $20.3 million impairment at JETX and an impairment charge related to National Beef's Brawley plant (which was closed in 2014) of $4.7 million . JETX owns both proved and unproved oil and gas properties that are included in Other assets in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. For the oil and gas impairment test related to proved properties, we compare expected undiscounted future net cash flows to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset. If the future undiscounted net cash flows are lower than the unamortized capital cost, we reduce the capitalized cost to fair market value. We used a third party reserve report in which the cash flows were calculated using West Texas Intermediate (oil) and Henry Hub (gas) NYMEX futures prices as of December 31, 2015. For one of our oil fields, the undiscounted net cash flows were lower than the unamortized capital cost and as a result, we wrote off the total capital cost. In the third quarter of 2016, JETX curtailed development of both its southern acreage in the East Eagle Ford and its Houston County acreage and performed an impairment analysis of these unproved oil and gas properties. To measure the estimated fair value of the unproved properties, we used unobservable Level 3 inputs, which took into account the following factors: remaining lease terms, drilling results and/or future plans to develop the acreage. The estimated fair value of JETX's southern acreage in the East Eagle Ford and its Houston County acreage totaled $51.6 million , which was $55.0 million lower than the carrying value as of the end of third quarter of 2016. As a result, an impairment charge of $55.0 million was recorded in Selling, general and other expenses in the third quarter of 2016. In the third quarter of 2017, JETX decided to focus on its other higher returning acreage and as a result JETX wrote off the remaining carrying value for its Houston County acreage. JETX recorded an impairment charge of $10.1 million in Selling, general and other expenses in the third quarter of 2017 related to the write-down of unproved oil and gas properties. Investments at Fair Value Based on NAV and Investments in Managed Funds Investments at fair value based on NAV and Investments in managed funds include investments in hedge funds, fund of funds, private equity funds and other funds, which are measured at the NAV of the funds provided by the fund managers and are excluded from the fair value hierarchy. The following tables present information about our investments in entities that have the characteristics of an investment company (in thousands). Fair Value (1) Unfunded Commitments Redemption Frequency (if currently eligible) December 31, 2017 Equity Long/Short Hedge Funds (2) $ 407,895 $ — (2) Fixed Income and High Yield Hedge Funds (3) 417 — — Fund of Funds (4) 189 — — Equity Funds (5) 26,798 19,084 — Multi-asset Fund (6) 154,805 — — Total $ 590,104 $ 19,084 December 31, 2016 Equity Long/Short Hedge Funds (2) $ 363,256 $ — (2) Fixed Income and High Yield Hedge Funds (3) 772 — — Fund of Funds (4) 230 — — Equity Funds (5) 42,179 20,295 — Multi-asset Fund (6) 133,190 — — Total $ 539,627 $ 20,295 (1) Where fair value is calculated based on NAV, fair value has been derived from each of the funds' capital statements. (2) This category includes investments in hedge funds that invest, long and short, in primarily equity securities in domestic and internatio |