Item 8.01 Other Events
As reported in the Company’s 2018 Annual Report onForm 10-K, filed March 1, 2019, on December 11, 2018 the Kern County Superior Court ruled in the matter entitledCenter for Biological Diversity, et al. v. Kern County(in which the Company and its subsidiary Tejon Ranchcorp are named as real parties in interest) that portions of the environmental impact report (EIR) for the Company’s Grapevine project required correction and supplemental environmental analysis; the court upheld the remainder of the EIR. The court further ordered that the Kern County Board of Supervisors rescind the Grapevine project approvals until such supplemental environmental analysis was completed. The December 11, 2018 ruling was memorialized in a final judgment that was entered by the court on February 15, 2019.
The Grapevine project was initially approved unanimously by the Kern County Board of Supervisors on December 6, 2016 and consisted of certification of the final EIR and related findings; approval of associated general plan amendments; adoption of associated zoning maps; adoption of Specific Plan Amendment No. 155, Map No. 500; adoption of Special Plan No. 1, Map No. 202; exclusion from Agricultural Preserve No. 19; and adoption of a development agreement, all relating to land owned by the Company.
At the time of filing the Company’s 2018 Annual Report on Form10-K, the Company disclosed that we expected the Kern County Board of Supervisors to comply with the court’s final judgment sometime in the first quarter of 2019. On March 12, 2019, in compliance with the court’s ruling, the Kern County Board of Supervisors rescinded the Grapevine project approvals described above.
As previously reported in the Company’s 2018 Annual Report on Form10-K, the Company will file new applications tore-entitle the Grapevine project(“re-entitlement”) and anticipate doing so in March 2019. We expect the re-entitlement effort will involve processing project approvals that are substantively similar to the Grapevine project that was approved by the Kern County Board of Supervisors in 2016. As part of there-entitlement, supplemental environmental analysis would be prepared to address the court’s ruling.
2