I’ll will to maybe try Charlie. somebody take in. want those jump to else Yes. This some is of and
doing. an AT&T, extent that customers T-Mobile. that going remain doing, we’re doesn’t partner terms of important transition MVNO of what they want of part we’re AT&T forward. part perspective an be of They off mean will to to from mean, be transitioning our obviously, important what In I the But from we’re again, our an primary that
able the things of that to be So, one that obviously we’ll is to AT&T. relate Las provision to Vegas on we have do
going about the somebody of want some or AT&T that. get that’s And a guys obviously, time. us -- better to customers -- maybe hope will talk So, else of move network. we one a can our take to bit to But to maybe
XG And the the a want LTE enough speeds XG on and pops they And the most as normally then, -- are. I States of are people that when the to, where and big in coverage to the consistency thing most on customers new for want for really our they United see we be for really don’t the today they XG, think T-Mobile talk customers And and and they will kind phone. part, stay across network difference picture priority. Some customers, is up them. better fast
States So, little a they’re for United XG today. Nobody confused. the in can charge more
obviously, coverage for a the think customers new so set that advantage today. for And tremendous have us, we a of network don’t has we AT&T
up FCC build is there fast they for their milestones. be all rural as going Although America T-Mobile to a over
XG. -- to can the be T-Mobile key. really considered consumer. blocks T-Mobile’s it’s and wins which in out But be the within we’re perspective, to XG The depending or going as that’s guys. job get will X.X to And And The other I But XG that That both XG well for bit is where for development, real certainly advantage can a different probably that does And AT&T, we building to, big do XXX our plus on today still as important that while megahertz one a C-band point perception we’ll in the the and something either think than from a is two. doesn’t to best both part marketing development, going of that’s and we’re to who that’s in T-Mobile a race we think it the be arguably our positioned of XG architecture be has see that race, differently. also our might going own of of with different little what XG those of they’re up the customers, leader the who out, doing be the XXX on megahertz. you those probably going is building differentiate feature think that a kind particular we’re an show XG build of the is, key important. customers it
the best there’s it, primary but get terms well-positioned. things for but it’s beyond forward. they We in for network companies, that them. could So, we’re to the coverage going is -- touched positive. customer, is AT&T With the extremely quality get and Stephen other value -- But both moderately AT&T probably the positive going and of think be just on it
have. mentioned one spectrum we You
get images spectrum. some and companies have cost -- be spectrum there and interesting scale are share an mirror might save XXX gigahertz megahertz. if of in have things We save the interest so -- could and you do both XX some We inclined. There
bit some sooner we’ll a lay out. that build could probably as use be it out, fallow spectrum than AT&T. to rather have We later by for until we put build we it And
committed from services of buy AT&T, our other we’re benefit think doubt lot like technology are of to we’re the and since I the buying that working from in there’s both together on there. interest get have teams the they’re have that partner business, things somebody where backhaul so. there’s a to So, common going on. And And and now, they video we those deals, a have we a
So, I get along, realize billion see will both Vegas. both are things potentially companies. can we’ll And It can much we Las be well. And you that will that that may other each question may We’ll sure can -- I’m frenemies. deal beneficial I companies remain not. not we forget about far there that as to this $X than when The to. we’re then we committed the could share as are compete obviously -- better with do -- as the that, a parties we but think