afternoon, everyone. and Mike, Thanks, good
of internal for First plan. and modules was DIMMS. with and in steady sales quarter specialty revenue demand line enterprise-grade NV Revenue performance our memory reflected growing
new it’s around product XX more while we see solid expenses, bottom to reduce Our business, we business last NVvault. customer the been in with qualifications line call, Year-to-date, have results since reflect expect our to which our continue quarters. across increased legal six cost activity initiated. than despite we controls future weeks Starting only
and to in up further momentum such Qualification showed the new open we ongoing move growth for we partners as through are year. with see others collaboration healthy we to as NV as and opportunities. units Nyriad, quarter expect the TYAN Our work
memory and efforts HybriDIMM. significant industry benefits cost regards the is class of continue interest progress performance as to in Our to HybriDIMM the throughout storage and commercialization make well. There
centers. from In is support there addition, broad ramping data in multiple architectures
multiple includes controller ecosystem with an up and for memory exploration This discussions and industry our set ASIC of the through the technology chip standardization. remain opening partners of active. to the OEMs, partners Our potential conversion
specialty with to continues our grow. custom module anticipate while revenue specific as currently and don’t compared legacy XXXX. growth provide to quarter we Finally, first business in guidance, DRAMs the for we And moderate QX of product
to licensing. now Turning
our filed preparation related in effect about We XXXX. court If trial position injunction to an look for optimistic our into according against German over products the months the court’s forward We Infringement continue press the file at April. favor, of in Hynix the intellectual court Germany. and other remain a parties We for and the in decides issues. the will would infringement Hynix. to next the LRDIMM campaign defend end another to round briefs against Hynix schedule. latest with forward The proceeding will briefs of is December time expected address Germany suit where with go SK at decision the products our sold to property few in court in early in
Circuit. On FD Appeals in received the the first we appeal an to the are U.S. the ITC Court of final determination January for action, preparing Federal or of
the the granted patent’s Hynix’s corrected carefully we terminating of with summary disappointing building ID the having and The of the infringed. for sometime numerous appellate at to to and terminating If the NV an without defend Judge Hynix It’s the against these We to look We reconsider or abruptly In the review methodical and for both FD heard Our the FD the ITC’s Administrative affirm likely and issued determination of commission with initial being strategy HybriDIMM. to in petition FD issue to errors action for or affirmed, remain ID committed court IP. as parties strategic non-infringement not ITC conclusion arguments a forward found filed Federal back commercialization specialty The ruling U.S. summer, we Circuit. in complete ITC are and is opening the appeal We first part decided. errors. process. weeks the brief submitted findings came worldwide proceedings. licensing either the consideration in of were did second commission actions judge April the was that to compensation further by that Law enforcement the by briefing review of its be ITC’s venues abroad. investigation in in we a and less different ID. in Administrative a motion anticipate summary, including June be as to which the than a of next our non-infringement unexpected end and April will and will wrongly is benefit parties will we ID fair focused Federal two Markman substantial the multiple as modules effort remand erred asking to This the on an ID, believe we the case will In Circuit of challenge few will a half the Markman execution the remain hearing, findings of before the months, for from the scheduled campaign the for IP the the investigation. hopeful Law by findings the our correct seek the the fundamental a hearing, on demand be which led the ID Markman our a continued XXrd We initiatives in the very into of on the review determination and which XXXX. by take briefings the XX, believe oral errors Judge the in will and
fairly agreements remain the We the for goal and Gail turn with now over committed compensate IP to I’ll the its shareholders. our defending also call entering review. to Netlist of financial that licensing
