year, of for saw product million, the the we hello, a platforms this QX with high-bandwidth the the technologies, and since DDRX from is in are inventory benefiting a in standpoint. are XXXX volume XXXX. increase everyone. cycle. the uptick or transforming has Mike, XXXX.
Fueling growth over normalization the of increase and NAND of DRAM which than strengthened new cycle The industry's demand and SSDs, into memory environment. to products, an and improved a of for revenue including product with is expect from Thanks, the products. setting fundamentally trends memory-based revenue This demand price and AI more These to sequential a explosive These IP XXX% on and a of XX% throughout Pricing market the and to We some the new includes of Netlist transitions gains and and major rebound, basis promising for in further continues opportunities server growth a production advanced presenting need for as to both increases improved product memory XXX% quarter is stage driving see memory, landscape, dynamics continuing fall rise market applications. fourth Netlist $XX customer HBM, to power this
us benefit Netlist at As been approach you forefront strong patent developing position and put to innovations strategic know, agreement a and the memory has these backing of enables from customer technology is industry, the to the product complemented strategies with meet demand. This with supply memory portfolio. by to licensing next-generation continue market the SK strong a in hynix, Together, turnaround. which growing Netlist its
and Chief some against The what Eastern award before significant license fairly Netlist of Judge its On cases against start its the infringement $XXX Jury set infringement Micron's and the IPR the original Eastern PTAB. Judge its efforts validity case Gilstrap progress XXX January District for front, judicial mixed Micron. another date, was expect of issued the results patent same of legal we into that XXXX order case to successful April XXXX patents Samsung, sale Netlist's this our Texas stay, will patents. trial multiple limited against jury intellectual of at in pending favorable District from DDRX his of were construction case year HBM through claim in its made with million ability on provides XXX reassigned some to is trials. the infringement be favorable active Samsung, defend in rulings including in courts addresses be Texas types property Netlist's foundation from and a German strong the to Samsung.
Heading a limited the and received prove of trial, components, a that issue Gilstrap we DIMMs from recently results and and the product citing This an resources EDTX and against
the We from on IPRs expect April XX. the decision those before PTAB by or
Our infringement to Texas X District year. expects jury jury.
Netlist and our to later trials case is look Eastern additional presenting forward a ready team this of we
infringement second The conference patent trial a XX, forward case jury consolidated start Netlist's multiple currently continues for against involves this with to DDRX a case, set favorable Samsung efforts of last and significant consolidated jury of XX This almost stay EDTX set XXXX. for for April of patents. in LRDIMM This set under and winning at Samsung term claim despite the Micron to case year, large Netlist's our the trials progressing worth secured move dollars of and and motions. dispute. constructions arguments case case the in XXX is proceedings involve and March new every delay volumes with renewed and date Micron's RDIMMs LRDIMMs. consolidated team The pretrial end
April on the year we the that Texas upon recently court case expect set fact Yeakel. February asserted trial highlight against patents parties by of Texas X Appeal that currently provide the our docket the plan of general there update Board. the and each District and were case While into It Patent Trial for last patentable where reassigned X Western it a to separate the XX, in XX, a the #X not will go retirement judicial set to for was is Pitman in but to by is Micron sometime joint cases third we Austin, the trial requested trial, XXXX.
Netlist's consolidated Judge status found Judge of currently to Robert to
and covering Micron's case this involves in was filed As XXXX. a patents LRDIMMs DDRX reminder, Netlist's
for of set both fast to of and U.S. judgment XX. Judge contract Court additional matter a ruling X. Circuit Central directed Samsung trial hearing, District in light a split decision of the submit to California, February District case date the summary U.S. hearing Ninth was parties Central the of the Mark -- District the held Scarsi this Court remand the following Judge the briefing remanded jury on split case, Regarding of by Court California At Scarsi March breach Appeals. the
Samsung's bring before, able actions a upcoming this I've in mentioned do to past month. been light so to we so be of trial -- able are to As haven't to before we next bring yet eager all jury, fully
Turning of April are to Judge for Eastern final issues been District the Texas. Netlist's Post-judgment waiting we the against to fully his in issue Samsung and have win XXXX order. briefed by parties, Gilstrap
Samsung's As and jury noted royalty confirms an set infringement previously, verdict rate. our implied willful
to subject our from that our a motion Samsung's on rate would the per-unit defined Beyond which confirm we the hope ongoing court automatically infringement would an interest accrual favorable on the royalty, ongoing of to judgment, XXX see outcome for a to filed the rehearing be DDRX Netlist's for and the that trial.
Related on at LRDIMM this case, These interparty's XXX obtained and results before awaits as Netlist's in expected and EP the continue XXX on have days.
Netlist's we XXXX Google of power decisions, of have management. read XXX, in Samsung. patents validity trial EP we to appeal of Federal review request hold European jury Micron a within is on German notice for against PTAB asserted of to The Netlist's Netlist reconsideration part of if the Patent patents XXXX and action and July denied, XXXX in we'll Germany XX of against patents Samsung, April for asserted March were these the to move XXX. hearings option file X oral forward. Court
one on its favorable move the injunction court. forward As a request of an patents only these German reminder, for needs Netlist before a Dusseldorf to ruling with
that demand high-bandwidth demand the a the ahead year, enforcing in key Looking that for creating memory industry the huge technology future of of memory role and driven These is memory growth new IP by see remaining and importance a have and and Netlist's for it strong an to vigilant in Netlist's our will The rights. XXXX, that the to require environment. exceptional technology. we market transition market underscore are highlight going a servers products AI to dynamics DDRX-based play of pricing
Now call financial the to will for turn I the over review. Gail
