period. our patent expanded performance, a ended strengthening the of good ago initiatives, We grade our of forward which we and an In everyone. a number enterprise offerings revenue of the with SSDs, portfolio. the increased compared on product the a of Thanks, product XXXX, and our of line balance year to IP. out fourth of included and including Mike, new to afternoon, campaign with build expansion the move defend year The the introduction margin, solid quarter sheets the
Hynix. we recent in enter From this with intellectual SK March momentum the to at International will positive hearing against case. wins the property the to XX March Commission, or Trade in from Moving We two be ITC trial initiatives. XX,
Hynix as and XXX first remanded full asserted the parent patent specific the to be case action. allows importantly, XXX attempted patent failed the patent and the merits XXX on not a contain for for denial the view ruling tried in patent process considered of the this to non-infringement assert a to straight determination the without denied are commission honed Hynix entire and a thoroughly of motion view going that short against And the this a due recent ruling patents. RDIMMs in Both on to trial. summary This the case Hynix's process against denied of most in and of in First final two patents been patent. the patent in the Judge’s is the for and infringement to The considered case. decision ITC fast trial children trial back circuit that Law a claims was ITC the first Chief have and February, before Netlist’s XXX this for are ALJ Hynix do a the and to of must straight Administrative Chief asking the be appropriate. go track in case, forego with to the XXX substantive to the the trial LRDIMMs. facts shortcomings ITC based once refined
In valid order, the investigation. Hynix. on patents authorities most This orders, XXX cited from Administrative of ruling Judge’s heart infringe the provides will the a the order received framework claims last as favorable XXX ITC. Markman the of by or the if to from Second, ultimately us this definitions both asserted year, the we order, patents key comprehensive construction and a the at the patent the the Markman related from are claim do with and Law Markman claims which decide
include of the the patents investigation be positions favorable these by ITC asserted The encouraged the products determination importation the the XXXX, second in to RDIMM by XX, are to SK We exclusion June and will by judge new of which issued a States. which scheduled into order case. of improved Netlist recommendation Hynix’s United be should LRDIMM infringement as whether granted is barring decisions the an initial acknowledged
so. Enterprises Turning than a currently Netlist's utility the appeal patent in in court's we court from the This model to model a by December be Germany, find different held have and derived. Munich pending plan trial Xth application We District decision Hewlett utility the January, against marketed which action Hynix our as LRDIMM In dismissed claim do court infringed. we not did construction is to have advocated was to Court the EU, being Germany. a and the German March to followed and Packard until the in
We an coming initial the receive expect of the ruling patent on to in this validity months. application
the California. selecting seminal current memory invalidate. reinforce covers three server which of being to standards established. in and the final XXX request Board Trial as to DDRX Officer, Netlist brought patent, PTAB. a teachings Houseman the modules, our as modules, the appeal was received XXX potentially specific that while Google days counterclaims Google's would denied Modular arguments Google Federal If to at and rehearing Smart well report to litigation value new has Google Appeal prejudice and subject be the including memory Moving in Patent the to our XXXX, FBDIMMs them the and use final jointly U.S. products file Google up notices patents unstayed. and continue Other as highest. patent. effort not January, invalidity gave rejected the and as Licensing with a another with the Eastern for of products has we're of intellectual was dismissed of of XXX, from of which ago, been currently hyper XXX appeal our Smart property, DDRX in by years in Netlist also validity in the cloud the found District that approximately patent server January, and this pleased now ruling Court to the District Modular comprehensive decade. agreed first the main for against against litigation participated litigation by the that the upheld failed October Netlist of one or the the of stayed drop PTAB by and reexamination patent Smart of activity initiated to Chuck discussions, Circuit. terms level against This and U.S. can Chief well thereby for with and Overall, parties Google's in in of the in process invalidate Also, continuations its of both addition Modular the the claims PTAB, this of staying their the they XX favorable regarding as decision signals other do area licensing most fight requested new ruling patent in invalidity we become but the against rank
course applications. We expect this we redoubling litigations to multiple well continue year, in of the submitting as as and this trend our over negotiations, engage new patent on as efforts
in patents our applications pace by as to portfolio and pipeline. patents secure to agreements. By as product development, evolving course engineers we been platform believe on the will continue well the the dozens placed and more have have strengthen new licensing created products, innovations our been pursuing of the we granted launch keeping as in high technologies. solid contains the memory two and expand we modules, seminal years to continue related memory other with and covering Our patents, industry, many memory the IP, In update over products bandwidth XX state past drives, today XXX new
Turning now to product update.
cooperation were During vault Memory in demonstrations the the fourth and we at of Supercomputing to offerings. Netlist follow the was Dallas, customers. up highlight SSD This NV strong, co-marketing our has DRAM The our SSDs and products level worked manufacturers Netlist’s being well to solid pleased Storage with product products Class participated HybriDIMM included activity the and interest in state as and dozens of in XXXX show, where led quarter and system and qualifications started. with we discussions in drives, with NVMe and as partnership Texas,
the have XX first of are XX a production remaining from qualifications complete samplings, Distraction and in the from now XX and SSDs These product NVMe terabytes. effort are places terabytes ranging SSDs the of than enterprise quarter, These customers' XX on compound As X very stage. have revenue growth recently fastest capacities with process. half which orders grow that in a ramp of rate. and SSDs performance in to introduced business for enterprise last SSDs our the are SSD SSDs more NVMe growing mentioned the market part XX% to been continuing and the we annual are us introduced featured path lines with new more fully market, year. well The evaluation in are year. high last to central of the the pre-qualification received are
are working closely qualifications process in in now additional Intel and with processor design xXX with generation vendor to platforms. are their an AMD NVvault NVvault in And our reference next we For platforms.
of we development potential software continued Financial the Gail discussions ecosystem as the last and in-depth the partners of our continued I'll ScaleMP, the with ASIC partners, in partners. well for as Regarding call memory and controller quarter, as over HybriDIMM, area in made significant server have commercialization progress this Review. progress turn for the partners now media to with
