for growing $XX.X of of combination everyone, revenues quarter with second growth Hi, Mike. which SK for avenues execution product of strategic for agreements the for patents, encompasses the a The Netlist. a over years sales. revenue thank of long-term Total hynix, call. joining were licensing open and and milestone and and multiple include cooperation, the of Netlist record a up cross-license five parties' product supply million million $XXX potential Hello, technology you
intellectual prosecution long-term. in CXL, sales of the high, are to are marketing, a trends, of including R&D in products the our the significant take advantage for the order running momentum we secular and and which business we quarter and with the investments demand areas, a fully patent with up for favorable for As and in business our ramping number result, exited property
short be to and Turning now and is storage side. to memory remain Global for future. to for the continues constrained product the foreseeable expected supply
As environment. discussed opportunity our market agreements well April, call, as on formal engagement the as the Netlist SK to this of we favorable a to last turn pricing has with In as had access strategic topline created After and hynix announcement in growth. the share such with we companies have quickly garner product strong began demand for create supply. supply,
these so product good start. sales existing and And and off with second the revenue a teams expect to for customers on XXXX. discussions new relationship marketing grow order are versioning we far, the through of to supply product broaden to activities, is arrangements in the leveraging engage Based customers. Netlist's half
feedback market write interests customer constrained. of We competitive passed offerings initial read have Initial GenX enterprise processing SSDs These recently well hardware seen SSDs, are major exceed performance remains through robust for as NVMe qualifications. Enterprise the our of SSDs for Netlist's and customer has OEMs. in testing and which drives highlights those
performance are competitive this position commenced customers round first a of The of We the GenX supply superior our believe and space. mass GenX market later revenue of bringing SSDs initial production in year-end. and expected before us to additional and qualifications year, we complete to will recently in the products the place strong are we this expect for
of we There Northern a Starting IP pending with U.S. District has bit now the Court and District quite the activity Turning for California matters. been of in to legal the litigation Google. in against and I'll the context, what additional process has believe the detail currently understanding transpired past unfold which help provide months. in the we to expect the in case. few will of and
major States to recent case. litigation of represent premier one Patent we having the most firms the producing Office the us in the they and second As & the Federal the with in the earnest Netlist Irell Trademark as patent Management country, District in in secured Court. required United Discovery Courts. of requested Manella the provide March. and Conference beginning previously against mentioned, by began failed following recently to is to retained Irell in course in and for settlements quarter the Head the Case Google, the material of Samsung and Unfortunately, Intel judgments as par
As a on was with dispute June result, a a XX. there discovery hearing held
response rights. Google the to Judge hearing, on Google's intervening Magistrate Netlist's discovery During Spero, to position required provide seeking requests, a
the I'd parties intervening to parties coming over confident early ruling, intervening no phases the rights rights position all the while the to entered take are agreed The early accused and as discussions or be X, or use in product to purchased make provide case. reissued currently rights was intervening with a continue rights. XX, expand July intervening the used related to with law. a products is or likely dispose into or due allows Google of We where our rights defense absolute of a that Claim Absolute to motion summary not reexamined to rights certain the an related infringe rights infringer a during made, and products purchased further a under party of absolute Judge due conditions to XX patent There rights. to whose reexamination. a XXX Claim two specific on issue process Following used as as provide or to XXX rights or for a for the that reschedule briefs of judgment the The rights or filed be types Google a reexamination. hearing protection. right-to-use agreed discovery date XXX remain to of to certain based of the summary judgment equitable on rights like the as and determination intervening motion intervening intervening On intervening briefing case September sell is can Google's in the on In allow made, intervening on certificate reply the as reissuance Courts to the completion moment this to before intervening or in date absolute that are Once the were will the Equitable the briefing before covered apply. patent. September patent, rights, to X, July Netlist in by rights, ruling the absolute intervening stipulation to contending of engaged patent. XX brief, the the intervening equitable intervening XX. intervening equitable may equitable for mediator. an provide absolute by more on use reexamined exist the intervening Responses rights, will summary an Equitable parties continued additional delay of findings based intervening rights months. matter early of was limited products rights. between contrast Netlist's published. Google The factual defense fully for seek two in the of order equitable manufacture, Unlike absolute XXXX, on must a of reexamination patent make sale February judgment filed Google sell weeks.
present original valid the whether During the rights of the claims patent XX, intervening XXX the the was question whether issued XXX any not on Google XXXX. identical determine of substantially case, patent involves the are analysis November Court claims”. in the of This patent original “to or in claims the the will
substantially claim process contends form. a rewritten XXX patent Claim was was the the independent original As Claim XX identical simply in is during that in of was original language. reexamination the our and changed the Netlist XX that claim an in not XX-year example, in the reexamination certificate and dependent XXX case,
July of judgment summary an the attempt for issue. motion On on XX no position to motion Our our sets a claim litigation. Claim intervening to the to strike XX Google related XX, filed out on remove Claim this rights from in
XX the will is the available, claim Netlist's the XX. of is that the is November, are was briefing January XXXX. is X, August Markman using also parties the note the Netlist's the due Netlist's to of occur hearing, this of not is a those is will Court use claims rights, favor Judge we to the brief Google's next construction for our case of typically has challenge. reply to briefing Google brief major that but there Google watershed applies of schedule, volume their materials determination and well. these will information key Netlist infringement. strongly feel ability claims all ruling ruling In hearing, is to were to infringing many publicly the and make start moment the will will a Returning years. parties All also XXX currently exposure intervening FBDIMMs, the X and We which taking on infringement asserted will to in only DDRX the claim litigation the discovery the to products. and After Armstrong ruling meaning been begin XX. with to due important damages February argue Markman finally, result of It substantive years and in will likely from claims event change XX. opening as for Court there briefing scheduled other it claims applies as on Netlist's December make of terms. current the It absolute exchanging decision known to Markman a as for determine is claims of respect Google's win the on due will the Google's number Google's will end to with and this in very seriously. to expand and intend meaning March of which about is contention February reexamination XX, brief technologies This regard which tactic be related a exchanging the RDIMMs The response due could important is very With bring LRDIMMs. in XXX, and extent as construction Our of claim in Thus amendment. October. construction related be also during not significantly the patent are clear hearing. review Markman to Claim response that amended process, that the this being regardless is in to and related
will the favor the process indication of the strong likely issue Given Appellate ruling the challenged Netlist's by decided of Markman of determined been provide claims early the last case. of patent the legal on by a the this in largely has definition of Court validity outcome year,
for more owned process properties seeks and and antitrust kind and of climate U.S. even are reign are market intellectual in fair, committed XX all earth millions big years, been implementing laws. resources times its exploit the are more tech for abusive illegal unauthorized reasonable more companies the enacting rewards giants technologies the non-discriminatory legal in a like but and global use to conducive and blatant tend Netlist that This rely are they virtual substantive spent to the innovations its protect to licenses budgets stronger Netlist. as behavior, has property by enforcement one of to to tech field anti-competitive the intellectual intellectual importantly, are to and legally, shareholders. these Google such create exactly tech difficult and been new of develop. has others. and not out have monopolies At company domain in lift with sizes pursue to most by that When other created Google on fighting to and committed the order enormous innovation bleed promote massive in try addressing to fair their remain judicial business companies in of by the the regulations and of to Netlist's powers innovation. playing a on to behavior into they behalf While Google is is than fight and dry. to years shamelessly prone to and IPO of Historically, long drag attempt giants scorched through tap their we a an now which their with pervasive lasting authorities and and in use the merit, tactics to on in players policies that obtain the property EU challenged Netlist industry experts, They
in case of the for Now trial move toward Central a expected. the to The forward jury continues case District as to Samsung moving Court the District U.S. California. on
patent filed an that Our JDLA originally be will – JDLA. November, Netlist, related contract judgment by breaches our in alleges with license a led to currently complaint valid for July, entered case seeks XXXX, Samsung required If under and in is Samsung May, any on successful, of breach the Dunn. a that is breached and Netlist with This litigation not complaint the complaint declaratory in The along to JDLA our licenses. being pay Samsung amended Netlist terminated will was into portfolio us light the Netlist contract, of Gibson XXXX. of properly filed amended XXXX. have for damages
During Court be would by the the time case. to close in filed second discovery and also Court. would were been due extend for the has view, a filed motion quarter, In XX. Samsung when hearing denied its process is the on when asked judgment the motions throughout case. Samsung Samsung requests summary These the judgment recently this discovery this forthcoming Netlist scheduled on August has opposition. motion pleadings. not A our in for the
summary changes for to discovery our NVDIMMs judgment, if prevailed case legal focused judgment After could this attention patents currently conclude of motion some jury Court Samsung summary upcoming this the patent around move, on Samsung's and to In four this Fact attempts have against trial for and jury not due on we District already the forward date. we anticipate August do day on proceedings for time, November infringement full are trial at XX. time. and read LRDIMMs. but stonewall look Given Motions not XX. our Micron scheduled in hold our milestones also expert We will will having are in on to our to deadlines we for that repeated the accountable. asserting where Texas, Western be discovery,
fall, to Court. forward Judge be Albright which August this Case filed, file other will certificate of of due our afterwards the set will XX, earnest. expect this We Conference is place And Netlist to take the move for to case answer later to is schedule will Management begin is memory in patent portfolio. Micron patent Micron's trial. in it once world. essential for these complaint in for be our They the XXXX, standard readiness a is NVDIMMs of front have one LRDIMMs the a with able applies. portfolio take revenues the our of manufacturers the like products, known license and and top to to and modules hynix will hynix, Micron to among products RDIMMs them three that It well SK manufactures similar necessary approximately which SK
license reasonable our Micron non-discriminatory manner. we We patents looking good engaging to are forward in in a fair, faith that so and can
that quantified the a in beyond agreement in of with Our recent number the provides modest agreements are significant future cooperation. of supply SK and with hynix there including its payment, When potential points the precedential totality, the strategic licensees. data informs value product agreements technology value SK upfront hynix
While RAND, the principles agreements instructor of and SEP, to take overall deal value economic substantial licensing from and not be receive – under and hynix identical will may licensees of our with the of we consideration patent, non-discriminatory potential reasonable total the a portfolio. the value reflect future expect standard-essential
Netlist. recently strategic to granted the on two prosecution were additional Finally, with patents patent front, value
XXX power features to recently patent issued U.S. management DDRX on memory found abbreviated modules. First, relates and
memory require power at as modules speed now to localized the was and personal servers standard high-performance first memory concept The itself. for the implementing modules. This custom power embedded some early increased all as module memory by concepts at memory those in industry of in designs is computers significantly and off-the-shelf management same design a the deployed DDRX, decade used modules. power including well ago management for modules over on time, As features Netlist our DDRX for in first invented those will
hybrid important to financial patents to the patent turn the of XXX European patent, is patent new issued, to I'll These Netlist. the European LRDIMM. the patents EP portfolio memory XXXXXXX for ammunition two now memory at related call equivalent add Gail patent DDRX over second and The review. new of
