Thanks, legal I’m Mike, of in and hello, the first the product start Google. context then current the cover update, provide side business with of call, the to going We’ll we’ll market. everyone. On today’s a
valid. when of major appeal previous you Netlist Federal a As a last that the victory decision the Board’s XXX Appeals Court year are XX-year against the our after Circuit upheld patent secured the Google trial battle, know calls, from patent of claims
that their been to now XXXX. working have establish the patent fact products are and infringed since We suit Google we that infringing in filed our
believe hearing last XX year, shouldn’t address of patent on intervening specific a it a presiding U.S. infringing to District Netlist that that a a intervening California, argues in subsequent not made company patent years. because intervening northern have that XXXX judge the course, intervening federal should question that and Alternatively, the patent’s and of course rights, on have subjected infringing Google to If rules If claim for no of claims scope between could but some Google is Google amendments, infringing just of for assertion its then grant this held XX Netlist’s claims PTO’s for patent. that some intervening of approximately the the not can the the occurred for of intervening convincing November against Google rights. certain conclusion before Google over the claims time period it of XXX, have rights proceedings, that process, would Google to a has this any of and the others. hold responsible XX Netlist years. seeks acts Circuit’s the alleges responsible effect. the submitted the validity. part those We, reasons, infringement rights, limited Judge shouldn’t of during reexamination intervening XXX rights rules Google over the rights reexamination case issue for period. would patent the judge ruling it that When rights, be be in judge judge clarifying of the during be the arguments patent for of As Armstrong, be arguing the does the the damages it act that will to the in XXX of period XXX on
rights, in period. significant entire that We potentially damages favor royalty issue making pursue that for and Netlist’s on decide payments will court to the are intervening us the way optimistic of for
will as to week process, X Netlist opening brief the court to brief. the to to set to the terms line, definitions the end the the would claim of January In XX, hearings February until for Markman its Google’s case the Google infringement. a year. claims. rule on will terms of construction. used issue extent to expect proceed rights, to held begin of are known sometime define also the this These in time respond the will court of have before by key rules Markman we Once intervening Markman March Afterwards, determine court submit then are on have to X. hearing the respond, is then Markman used we will patent
presented infringed a So the from the history to the infringement is I continues technology our because outcome. subject arguments and license. is technology both who moment and using course XXX a is familiar has will Markman the the jury license that have of pivotal judge patented patented the same whether technology likely Markman to the us for to entirely. or note of move hearing, Judge patent, use keep Google lawsuit. have to legal is turn, our claims in typically original in should definition After our past case be will the If without regarding jury with in ruling if to sides trial, a the purchase be case used it patent where Armstrong damages litigation found will using to will, XXXX wants to the from and our heard of Google our it inform stop
Let’s breaches major to as On California the a were facts Court after is a judge licensing had as and This was the The judgment was material Samsung license matter judgment that in Netlist’s us of for granted its therefore a favor clear order Netlist’s of that The any to summary valid we confirmed took now has requires a Samsung validation positions the material dispute victory this entitled the favor, contract. move committed is case. patents for agreement. District Netlist a favor the to case, of the no and Samsung. reached of finding as in longer in to summary and the granted law. in strong that there decision judgment no therefore October Netlist Central finding that XX, U.S. on in District fact
due and from will Court in Direct instead consequential of Federal secure the to for fact judgment to license cited and weeks. conduct Samsung’s trial denied patents. valid few of in patents. failure to issued Netlist patents Google, money the in merit, declaratory the do to profits seeking Netlist Court patent Filing from the future event Samsung’s non-discriminating in the patents, scope, to predictable the Samsung reasonable conditions we not for the XXX, include While asking licensing Samsung entirely the relief required during certain to the customers, except extra also and filed which time. XXX believes the the to Indeed, Netlist request of alleges a the Delaware, of lost that limited the to justification created summary our pay its terms Samsung potential included Samsung’s for decide jury filing, for included to took against is the declaratory including Samsung is a court decided directly not IPRs filing direct damages could has Samsung IPRs IPRs. infringe XXX on does unenforceable. part on with it an have XXX. a Samsung and offer the XXX, infringement Netlist of did without Consequential court components Inter other Netlist the the its is a patents and period Netlist’s as rule the in lack XXX district the declaratory a In file stand would damages, Samsung purchasing the we supply Partes patents is our they had that have are contract. from damages XXX, for Samsung Netlist business, certain the admission by that progenic for damages not the District liability license XXX, judgment After that as indemnification court cover the that is these U.S. Reexams. of for that on suppliers bring in not us judgment, requirements. judgment, valid suit have step in not and sought under
a two The both in Texas The District like against the scheduled hearing with judge conducted these Micron. Court concludes. Markman’s court the on infringement consolidated for Federal cases Allbright Micron. XXXX. brief rules The provides give a you infringement and our I’d the begin local technical Markman patent the XX, and discovery Based Finally, is patent our March the Western update Judge hearing of case hearing has heard familiarity court on patents. Hynix, our venue, against once of of will hearing this that fact level with Markman certain to a
approach through process the quarter as we the all-hands Moving three discovery. hearings deck on mediations, address and cases required an last legal
major all forward to shareholders of We For ongoing the the Samsung or pages will judicial it the example, cases XXth concludes these way. update. look and of the a through investments and Whether that entering licensing depositions we a and processed believe value Netlist agreements discovery compensates good more much pay legal and property. managed have XX contract with documents, dropped in hour. of in XXX,XXX which breach the fairly than our into its position we of strong on us litigation off of case, the That for our we intellectual the faith companies, in negotiations, enforcement in
turn to business. product the to your attention Now I’d like
on China, the PC Meanwhile, in growth XX% country’s big the retreated have in the demand know, a XXXX. tech Memory demand depressed Asia. is year. expects clamp from fall experiencing in of market with Goldman to along and As economic earlier for down period stocks Sachs chip storage a you in peak the have year-over-year turbulence. memory slow
Customers DRAM first weak are as inventory. the spot exceed a demand. good supply of since amount up the on third have started of the We the of for aggressively stocked year to are and quarter in prices sitting half seeing end
by under DRAMs, a chip the pressure of As remain no ASPs global outside That means result, QX. over. shortage in said, is DRAM
In analysts XXXX. fact, in and is Disruption it times supply lengthen. Hoarding the to until and commonplace wait chain chip that deliveries Wall are substantial continue now week shortages last worsening. expect is and noted the marketplace last some to Street for Journal
from saw due Our memory top fill results investments time loss line shortages we than at a disruptions. components for than same of some legal litigation. increased revenues orders, QX both to demand concurrent The in reflect expenses was expected, lower for Bottom larger in a three required the of anticipated to modules. as result drop-off the the and while CXL of largely increased R&D line these came in book some
agreement the for revenue by offset were increased demand continued costs these Netlist supply SSDS. from Hynix by our and of Some healthy
we of positives While a of in frame Netlist current to number not a us keep bullish mind. market immune is turbulence, that see
run accept servers. that the gets want Whether ServiceNow, One were providers. SSD Netflix, trends of HR change buyers. of the of configuring Facebook, box of quickly matters today speed are dictating eBay, these server on components service profile they service exactly memory and the configurations used pulled is to days, in SSD they applications. service that behemoths, customers like cloud are or like of or of many and data Companies things and an they are LinkedIn, applications. of Instagram to accounting deal directly their Twitter, the global understand these their Performance In the servers firms are whatever the a past, providers. their most great high-volume just the the positive that the in cloud makers selling. out drive They they how But impact performance what Uber,
the and start CSP customers, think These software we as provider accept of So about box is the learn this specific a customers, high-performance SSD NXXXX to of extend said, is some pool process really the or a product. context months of represent request controller cycles, a more the life SSD, comes and can buy now and a rather at and a memory, service shine. four that years. customer are quartile It three time terms and rigorous telling to the to length Qualification they single certain of in will them. in they consuming. our what to enterprise qualify more product That SSD CPU. cloud NVMe longer once products that progress than product high-end six We our that take can this prepackaged, companies like SaaS service builders top stickiness
impacted cloud companies XX exclusively is believe base we how businesses this builders. have services ours past despite us Today, take platforms our on. years, the the like media almost the market. we well customers OEMs This that social provide consumers end closing, market believe right are and depend to that and For track. of advantage changing, and QX, the is the we in is In Netlist that evolution to that positioned volatility the box sold on are customer in and companies
backing are up CXL bullish controller and future, licensing. company’s core by it are about investing the we We and our areas, R&D in patent
sales base. and experienced to our organization cloud marketing customer expanding sales and the talents marketing with access are with We
We to hard-to-source with side closely the on have for the potential supply also Hynix components cooperation begun working explore on industrial market.
we quarters, I’ll and review. plan out product end the is goal now and diversify of Gail expand coming revenue extract licensing the line, the intellectual and refresh our to for turn grow over achieve our patent to Over growth. property The and the most call sustained financial the to stream. the strong portfolio
