hello, everyone. and Mike, Thanks,
drops reduce SSD significant all efficient and plans throughout to support In reported recent announced commentary that chain. which we to resulted continue market. Despite are and largest investments of by production future results call, has and absorption need inventory drove Recent and long technologies. conditions being that large suppliers to started quarters. Recent for accumulated guidances allow this, segments for markets year. higher the have memory are products. facilities trends performance this And challenging the impact by strong, glut have the announcements The outlook favorable last more third indicated the expected of also price of need a in weeks, of cut quarter highlighted and and SSD dynamics, performance impacted excess manufacturing that business macro in have memory has supported in environment. substantially weak for stock As and a has declines term unwind. continue Many demand memory lowered the our pandemic-related has to the semiconductor remains the for consumer next as U.S. industry the trends reflects term technologies. into term new memory memory supply these highlight industry to near the Netlist's CapEx the for accumulated in advanced for long in
quarter growth We quarter, thanks SSDs. significantly XXXX from On the and with increased in product to nice ago grow large declined year the customer a branded did but see SSD our third continue basis. orders Netlist qualification sequential pipeline a product side, several business, XX% revenue on to
with Netlist's biggest we customers enhancing that And are to agreement opportunity not access. however, directly hynix. product Hynix Our target remains markets, have growth SK the which expand by to manufacturers. ability lines supply the to major is relationship this new continues our supported and
pushed added XXX most patent their and attempt order, Moving of paused days Northern on call, the Eastern we Delaware, the of party is Judge against add California denial our Texas. Under X. that I had the a District now declaratory to the following Judge's claims that Google's case. is Netlist's Google due Management suit, of the in Samsung on on the of for action Seeborg outcome to against and of the Case Conference. the as In dismissal case Samsung's November Google back for last intellectual District relief to case stayed response noted court's Netlist's to pending property, of XX of the
XXX, includes three patents, RDIMM reminder, XXX Netlist's XXX. the a As and now action this
of Netlist LRDIMM is Texas, to action where the been the management, for action Eastern District in claim patents see which that coming infringement the pending And court's sets now Netlist near of on to module court months. hearing first for In are schedule on magistrate That three against at expect the there X. power two term has actions We the assigned a Samsung. case set set is and construction, of the or on is high issue for Samsung's covering November HBM bandwidth patents. focused memory,
at District our there, expect of conference X. establish of complaint as two second they motion Even key is the to to for in a patents, patent to set milestone trial, filed appeal and important District stay of the a XXX Texas, this transfer light Judge the XX. patents in and In judgment determining second for Northern Netlist definition matter Central infringement We case other clear of District family. Gilstrap same California's November the scheduling at three hearing action, case Netlist's on is Ninth patent Circuit the consolidated patent patents adverse recently action the in Samsung resulting responding Eastern on second of to with of EDGX set contract to case, the the Samsung's baseline Samsung May the would of and action the be only in the received the XXX for micron an California. Chief XXX of and the of claims the in this issue for Samsung Samsung's the infringement which before breach
through expect sometime a joint cases early trial to the schedule We receive XXXX. consolidated in
hopeful of Given in XXX to Judge the to the this case Micron. to Gilstrap deny State request This transfer leads District recent activity, Northern patent we us Samsung's the California. will that are
Netlist Like HBM, while XXX and action Texas Eastern Micron's District LRDIMM, with As Texas. infringement first addresses the of patents. two and related PMIC cases patents has second the Netlist Samsung Micron in six covering now Samsung involves matters, the two Micron against the the of
January again Western against case four Texas against for XXXX, the Netlist XX. filed Micron has in The patents first stayed on resolution asserted Micron of XXXX. claim the set the The of five Netlist's July IPR case pending and Micron District trial remains construction there.
LRDIMM denied. inner our -- our an of for petition by XXX me of also As was the request to -- was Micron's reminder, a LRDIMM PTAB. rehearing patent excuse denied Micron's party's review institute
with Germany for to continue Google. final hearings September make set progress the court in cases May before for Micron, November the Finally, and for XXXX, Samsung for oral
In Micron in very Netlist's is licensed ensure includes and monetary patents. to efforts and Samsung are damages to intellectual of These compensated. the and relief Netlist's part addition active is injunctive enforcement both property and fairly matters. seeking Europe we comprehensive in IP a that also strategy U.S. in many are
broadly. turning like to Gail, would comment process the over Before call to IPR the more I on
patent seen is presents greatly IAM, IPR The are example latest to significant companies the the Federal process of on decade, that been PTAB's times by Circuit flawed decision current with over XXX Some a Appeals. patent, like itself, has that is of our IPR twice recent to the the challenges media validated five Court ultimately by and the interview the including institute and may my have you an leading and aware us. PTAB IP
exploit out routinely and long others' for closely, addressing you're bad the the we and believe we in to companies individual to strongly a gone importantly, will companies incumbent has PTO Law, that order to be If bar. If possible most the as decision AIA number like reform as free the reinstitute in impunity. post-grant in IPR patent there be to greatly inventions and the in is obviously review a patents, for has the under process. Congress reexaminations. legitimate There innovative form perspective, hold system has of bills standing, system with the currently filtering for XXXX Patent reformed, out use are patent in huge action with watching to inventors, allowed the the the Netlist. of threshold through IPR prospects to of the time Instead the From of institution, a a holders implemented historical changes higher allowing consideration requirement that my such damaged
the We based also judges compensation are it incentivizes institute that the to troubling find patents. and quality for invalidate point system a the that ultimately judges on PTAB
and PCs of We end tens shipments include in and XXX this coverage of for These our in memory to patents memory. annual dollars packages, of high server advocate holds of of our read products. billions memory area. changes leadership will over Netlist now in to for memory traditional worldwide continue patents patents addition the on
to damages the and past are We and the months forward I'll in look of in coming licenses. actions, financial cases these front determination the our getting enforcement Gail to future call committed for for jury to turn a of over review.