Thanks gross and Mike. product first and the These price everyone. XX% reflect line in top environment compared increased revenue full strong product in results delivered XXXX, half improved the performance of prior year XX% favorable to year. And the XXXX. demand profit Netlist hello,
Analysts memory environment throughout the business. in in to product performance impact the saw and inventory the the scope decline historical end towards company's terms side the starts enormous remain second However, we memory of half demand of to a of combined inventory XXXX industry on of normalize. year of sluggish said, severity. demand levels in dynamics expect the create and continue the in inventory, year industry anticipate improvement the downturn That to with post the to the pandemic of build as to most its gradual up market
for double term important and that health the power well capacity for HBM, memory such a rollout growth controls technological the four stack is with dies that bandwidth tied long the along there as board, is of Across in led the high modules. bode reduce DDRX, or memory DDRX localizing with onto intelligence improved terms to bandwidth packaged industry. that Beyond developments, need higher consumption. has brings a the the HBM or logic speed of of a which trends, enhanced power performance are The industry the eight adoption with dies. of components of memory, capabilities the wide DRAM also and the macro the of moving towards together DDRX management of the DRAM layer
industry. memory it's the processor. As self-managing memory the of difficult from pioneered manage Fundamental speeds a is and has the decade densities increasingly to ahead shift complex to subsystems more Netlist increase, assist becoming what afar
is continues areas in and such load areas and Our future. important which campaign. by efforts industry have from and these rights and manufacturers. CXL. being in Global memory now small to made as ago both technologies years significant Netlist Netlist in Enforcement with emerging widely intelligence which memory Netlist created as well localizing progress IP its implemented as innovate to large IP in XXXX innovations tied the resulted the our campaign benefits in HBM reduction, in computing the and DIMM fundamental are of will DDRX on breakthrough to other benefit enforce management continue to The today power
and are are quality ensure by secured those Our marketplace by patents that fairly being high is continuing implementers. our innovations goal to patents licensed
jury in a Texas, developments culmination we outside house case in of trial. in experience the council continue [Arel] to the number Manila. the We our of now form XXXX of there approach of XXXX, Eastern in a both of and In including and and Samsung favorable the Netlist’s action this firms, in leverage were against District the
two the allowed testimony with conference discovery Netlist's construction additional issue, to case court's Samsung's of As stay creating begin case or memory, at accommodate Judge court for adopting This six schedule The trial discovery. March request and set the claim Samsung's set the weeks deposition, HBM. a jury Samsung's final case basis XX. conclusion a December, many second the In for Gilstrap proceeded of terms into the claim expert April establishing moved pretrial recently, infringement. position of reminder, patents start the largely addresses LRDM, motion for has now More issued was to and is covering this and bandwidth high order, Netlist infringement and to Netlist's phase fact DDRX, the up for to a rejected XX.
and District the Netlist’s Northern stayed XXth, counter second pending XXXX. October against cases scheduled hearing presiding set claims. in We these case jury consolidated trial a a as each both infringement is of District the a the has construction that Google because brought scheduled also Eastern jury week. amended our Judge patents. shaping the XXXX. will busy child is Texas. that for claim the this patent. for for the of Claim the against is related case that Micron constructions consolidated July entry over scheduled claim XXX Gilstrap is one the and Micron trial case I Samsung. against case set Samsung for January XXXX case the that action a Judge would us declaratory to proceedings expect second The of cases jury for to of Google note after The party construction have There's of up outcome same set in is and XX, for Samsung October, includes XXX Netlist's Eastern Netlist October Texas for a date of California be District trial Delaware. and case because month approximately also to against patent XXXX. six last for The patents, now on and for is involves remains been against in trial Gilstrap a April for
against in hearings but to cases denial day Micron proceed Western remains Google, Germany one against the the XXX set against a of as Samsung and remaining for for petition the of upcoming the X jury ahead are and District institution IPRs trial of stayed oral eventually against Google, expected. case X Netlist filed Samsung Dusseldorf. Micron, Micron's Final the also on are in for October four will PTAB’s given patent. The Texas Micron resolution IPR Micron X September moving all Netlist The pending in May patents, for
come We expect to six to court weeks decisions hearing. individual after each eight
also the in damages, monetary is injunctive German relief to seeking addition Netlist In cases.
rehearing Patent Patent the to decision following against a XXX on Appeals the you of Opinion IPR Board's the IPR matter our of I patent, by proceedings Trial would request with Panel. a and also like request XXX review the presidential to update institute trial along submitted for XX the USPTO's Netlist for claim
know, as past decision been following over Google's and Circuit related of times on the of claim the validated after the at to Court years including Samsung's abuse behalf XXX an the proceedings, the you view Appeals. has a PTAB IPR various important XXX many and invalidate to patent an attempt XX reexaminations final Federal ultimately As process. two appeals latest We
broader our provide between of on input reforms her case Congress sponte available take this the the in and written I've USPTO review. February they authority sua needed requiring much X, pending about and X, the to the IPR and she to with She visited her recent the on of a her cited for our economy. months In Samsung Samsung's and PTAB several XXXX, on also the review. order law. Google. We've discovery in website. both reevaluate review, IPR as on on company's Vidal stayed current On Netlist's XXX the consider USPTO Director, under personal the patent Kathi assigned entered decision community, on outcome the to admitted deciding January patent XXX importance legislative exercised the proceedings brought under request effects of publications her board IPR detrimental the past and and innovation Director Vidal the to the months, couple These patent a abuses articles thoughts are the the industry in of system relationship
under deny We're institution also at vacate request this ordered a determines Samsung the review closer that of hope a petition. facts Google Director her must if pleased petition, that look elevated the and all Board its to real that the relationship. underpinning will interest Samsung's party and Vidal She take decision Samsung's Board the is Google's the board and
extensively labor and we've In fruits look of years invested our validation over coming in process intellectual the summary, the forward our enforcement property the seeing IP to and months. of the the in
the now Gail turn over call review. I financial for the to will
