morning. also Good Mike. I'll technical that we the with morning apologize some Thanks slight had. this difficulties Hi. delay for
strategic five LRDIMMs, its Bandwidth patents on DIMMs Memory case get conclude week, address Netlist Texas. in trial infringement High District against call. all Samsung Samsung's families of Last of let's with the three The DDRX the on Eastern So product and jury categories, of Netlist DDRX or HBM.
the production will DDRX the of is memory ship started DDRX understand Netlist next and size DDRX scope a ago. generation decade. are LRDIMM was the of for over in be DIMMS the manufacturer speed descriptions to brief it better by capacity of next just today, in over in invented these about volume Netlist coverage to and Some and servers that and decade memory patents, order products the highest highest
with system DDRX for using generation use high-end the Years in DDRX in allows DDRX ago, well being enterprise to on-DIMM DDRX higher at than is memory, memory. of as deployed the technology operating memory while less that DIMMS management power. prior perform in speeds power management the now power and created commodity intelligent Netlist PCs applications Netlist's used the grade as all DIMMS,
for bandwidth technology that three-dimensional higher an of dyes, a an memory vertically enables capacity. memory, high which achieve to array is multiples of overall HBM acronym stacking efficient is
push being planner of DRAM are used capacities. As the industry's HBMs [ph] limits more higher constrained are the densities reach traditional more of towards to the and physics, by needed
lower increasing Netlist's of bandwidth to critical while the proprietary component at are modelling, stacking cutting compute high electrical large or driven technologies HBMs ChatGPT. including speeds to Indeed, and systems unique all GPUs scale operations and their edge allow like tasks, dramatically the array higher HBMs operate AI-based overall load capacities. latest by complex
DDRX business. these HBM future will the revenues the memory account Samsung product coming in years. collectively, has cycles. majority for vast and touted likely as And their focal segments for points early both in of life Samsung's are memory very the their their of categories product Both DRAM
awarded five Netlist those jury victory and Netlist for the jury none five million Netlist damages and of to had patents. that Samsung that Netlist's all patents to resulted five owed Samsung, $XXX patents trial, on been were were wilfully for net by damages all the of their any trial Now, verdict Samsung patents invalid counts. verdict money infringe infringement six-day against infringed all a confirmed infringement. in in award decisive on The unanimous that The the and
three award damages The comprised was components. of
through million of DDRX from The and December sale the XXX of jury for units March, XXXX, LRDIMMs $XX.X awarded patent, period which First, XXX,XXX the product. read of Samsung. XXXX, the on infringing Netlist
patent, and DDRX XXX through RDIMMs patent December through then March of XXXX, the the Memory read XX which patents, jury DDRX XXX UDIMMS, stands of DIMMS and on and the Dual on X/XX million on again, and XXX X.X In-line period of SODIMMs combined Netlist DIMMS March all for Samsung Module. awarded for January $XXX.X million XXXX, for the units sale for XXXX Second, the the
the for XXXX to of and on million the XXX for of read jury between $X.X Samsung Netlist patents, May period-only HBMs And which XX-month the awarded HBMX and for sale XXX March third, HBMXE HBMX, $XXX.X million XXXX, components.
we highlighted Netlist's the value The of clearly and trial tremendous provide. the patents unique solutions
inventions for could saw jury other relying infringing products, Samsung the point under evidence commercially in Netlist in of innovation patented engineers believe created fact, patents. of viable to In critical covering trial the they these that a patents ago. thousands nor as claimed technologies, Samsung not Netlist's We many and than were Netlist the unique any that years confirming on five the alternative a oath, making validation the of single to could of point pieces evidence the qualitative
steps, will assessment In its judgment procedures following of filings. terms a of final next the court enter and post-trial
Gilstrap instances to to be by This damages sole the awarded a has all the infringement found enhance the opportunity is decision Judge, at As of the wilful, Chief jury. judge's were discretion.
briefings, jury's are but will for. we anyone is will and take weeks. deadline necessarily believe available of There The to to appeal expect This for to of that date the likely we entry to the a a days file final few them which the follow is Samsung of do verdict. avenues Appeal from the post-trial Notice something judgment, XX prepared are
a covers currently up these strategic ruling is using to without technology As products. operating March of this this license Samsung Netlist on damages year,
light attempts these patents remain we've emphatic build in in made discussions always, party licensing the upon -- permission. to our open using that without expect of past. ruling, Samsung currently and the discuss we substantive As this bilateral more light engage our technology other of any we in to with In of
XX enforcement other on IP just Texas, Micron are in is construction concluded Gilstrap trial Samsung The this quick which set Eastern Judge to also a to case with provide you District part Moving I'll efforts. on currently actions, XXXX. the of the related global that now schedule. on begin year, trial of Netlist's Claim part the and before jury update against of July the infringement set for patents a January XX, address for that remains were is
the And Micron pre-trial Texas, patent child the and cases District which related each the streamline the in of and were second its of case Eastern XXX patents. against process, consolidated involves Samsung to set
the trial IPR Samsung to currently October patent reasonable are of includes Netlist's PTAB Claim the arguments also set While patent case begin addition have invalidity set to success. not XXXX. number XX, as Samsung's relating already The a XXX likelihood Samsung's are constructions XX, jury April and did XXX, decided the the of XXXX, LRDIMM. survived for DDRX has attacks on
set European relate hearing for hearing infringement Samsung DDRX in and was the hearing LRDIMM that for Google to The Texas USXXX patent, on XX. to Micron technologies. subject on against our case set is for the week September EP-XXX Samsung just for the the the analog next Germany, is and trial May November. In EP-XXX of
in Google. proceedings, decision Finally, and Samsung patents for required February X-XX Netlist's the regards assigned USPTO PTAB begun. the discovery that reevaluate between process as to Vidal to on entered board reported we admitted a the IPR This call, our relationship has in Director, last on request
advisement since such by and part the month, Netlist have our decision. briefs, Netlist IPR an decisions board new several of to process reconsiders an Samsung the of PTAB the under claim which this director patent. contents institute as brief Claim opening as of will it set previous this exchanged Earlier will XX X-XX its of against discovery filed under -- Vidal's per take
Director month Samsung next a from we so. real is or brief final the underlying process while XXXX. Vidal, anticipate of last the a XX, board will The question interest May decision is is has IPR whether party in stayed of reach the due by reconsidered. Accordingly, that been the Google Meanwhile,
their advocacy case to and and of in the Manila thank at ongoing our for Lastly, investor would the tireless Samsung recently team I like base. support Irell the concluded
financial I'll Gail call take turn to -- the the over review. Now, I'll for
