everyone. Thanks, morning, Susan, good and
April. U.S. Let drinking me Slide to PFAS published the start on and reviewing rule EPA's by X turning water in
and we stated, water U.S. quality. to remain regarding steadfast protect quantity our multiple Susan water that be a quality, fully was these a EPA's reliability. limit wastewater the rule industry X are of parts trillion challenges. and per unchanged drinking efforts and commitment the terms in As support among faces EPA's These contaminants We of in water the challenges and leader to the final PFOA to PFOS. water water for industry the provider drinking in solutions of
The years systems X to now compliance have However, final the capital improvements. would in the to water allowed extension to states X the comply rule. grant from includes the years was federal that federal been X-year for window timeline extended
$X to As analysis stringent anticipate specific of estimate up contaminant estimate of PFAS our related more adopt billion state guidelines. expenses our upon any $XX including capital will implementing don't annually rule guidance this currently with limits, any not comply and with always, Based and work we to we change rule. the to of do operating level of the to new rule, preliminary of maximum to our incorporate state regulators federal our states assuming additional new million
compounds X by the not also for additional limits estimates. do We currently new expect these the PFAS to impact set EPA
as rule-making substances in and hazardous also CERCLA. designated PFOS EPA PFOA U.S. April, under separate a Through
provide systems the actively and PFAS. that lawsuit. liability to federal water X MDL a disclosed advocate multi-district and support bipartisan settlements we legislation remained XM or Previously, litigation, and DuPont coming of out a As PFAS continue party under far we for would as protections of CERCLA receivers reminder, to so passive that we've wastewater with
dollars path and of DuPont most manufacturers XM the each an from to is As of The The manner PFAS be in we respectively. MDL settlements its final in proceeds the approval possible pending. recouping issued still received our to believe and for this amount February March Court expedient the from of customers. best settlement shared, year, we is this
the annualized Slide an latest activity XX. Virginia, an I'll states. to additional XX. issued effective Turning our authorizing in cover order in February Commission regulatory In $XX West million the revenues
using month. water affordability. million rate provides water X,XXX be is a effective Commission additional we cost will $XX incomes typical the order This change example an at of also lower annualized fixed volume phased American of one X. authorizing a gallons residential are in addressing additional that request, related X,XXX per that order to XXXX. DSIC this on an the We for the customers. May allow monthly X-step They water a cost gallons our $X will issued customer. usage charge over to residential for customer of Indiana received provide The customers through With just change, the process use basic revenues typical of effective $XX In March new the customer for Indiana, many no all low-cost million service fixed than water approximately additional for the also water above innovative revenue approved ways design an customer
cases. active to Turning
jurisdictions. see progress in general in X rate You we have can cases
made will are to these in cases investments these of centered around the capital and continue make we've All states.
our our the California, by in and well expected. day in be story the Illinois, intervenor in followed February implemented to Jersey for milestones and X. rates rebuttal In now In testimony as in Jersey, May, the an case on and the in Kentucky deadline and the will Virginia, July, testimony in will Commission any milestones rebuttal case as staff evidentiary Illinois staff cases is in followed were October. in progressing June. New New September expect Our order intervenor we act In Kentucky, X. next May are by Interim the hearings next be in
In next filed driven in order milestones are that August for of we May decision effective last proposed and in case expected billion likely vital case in $X a to July. the capital the be the in new Pennsylvania, ALJ we The investment. from year expect was by a rates final
for the in midyear. Tennessee. last just and with a yesterday, And for Commission expect on benefit capital cases rate reflects Service of Iowa Pennsylvania's a we And we of customers. long-standing filed outcome investment infrastructure the finally, needed improves that case notice that support general the We plan constructive front, the to that filed State we case rate week, Missouri Public file by
new magnitude rate cases of and service $XX maintenance. On This the million Slide we step general annualized of on that XX total, help water incrementally regulatory surcharges. includes and approval $XXX efforts, passed of of we January. see revenues since execution in in areas request acquisitions legislative in have can were smaller bills signed line In in annualized million from states that $XX front, total hydrant rates $XX have pending. million replacements, expediency the million of the revenue show from and utilities To infrastructure will fire lead those increases you state our X and
customer us to about Moving every topic cover you've and just affordability. heard a quarter, XX Slide
and As we've are balancing said, system focused we the investments very of magnitude customer affordability needed. are on the that
share. in terms Our very positions wallet or industry are good company and relative in affordability our of
U.S. will month. median of levels geographies plan target Our to is consolidated us we of bills specific to That to we project system-wide these stay our water household for household serve by The allow less in per Census in average residential communities. analysis that income income. water $XX customer supported have place rising the data of median bill or X% is $XX investment Bureau within residential
to time, example. who design continue with with assist doing we're affordability, customers our I described earlier, we realize must and in programs involve an Indiana strategies as as around the same to rate what challenged our we are At
to month, Water American Rescue relief funds. customers $XX $X California another last financial faced the million in Plan comes total under through additional Act California Water California American for that challenged This just As funding million the for customers due announced program. pandemic. to utilizes bill example, benefit a Federal who hardship This an the program COVID-XX brings American
to We permanent advocate similar continuing for place improvement for management demand electric regulatory gas customer in of what's customers. federally deliver increased efficiencies as and rule cost are for And technology, to also and and program, years copper affordability capital focus scale PFAS proposed many such lead as water a our low-income strongly especially been to the continue the on final funded utility needs. on we and rule assistance
capital Lastly, corporate to the that investment and safely higher their on XXXX. state capital efficiently capital leaders teams on drove footprint. goal The the shows across a great last plan. projects page compared of year. our our to $XXX billion the period first significant the the quarter, our on job almost deliver quarter, timely and keeps and effort our investment in million This in by of increased Slide the our executing of that hit to pie required XX approximately in did systems It charts improved result and our same and nature to of us side speak investments recovery right of the pace $X.X hundreds
driven As is a on spending we share with a affordability. focus by strategy, regulators and risk-based balanced legislators, capital our by
pipe, infrastructure includes us, line of basics the related replacements. service includes proactively to replacing standards meeting lead but For our it damaged older also renewal
the the times believe our for over reduce health years, time cases. but Through recovery general the reliance of to capital This to rate of many mechanisms the forward our we risk said have size regulatory the customers. rate seek right thing we also to allowed lag and and service of lines customers. us earn we on not safety return, and general firmly is can increases mitigate lessen helps for lead do removing As only our to before, test
X investments and consistent next pattern which test more earnings capital modest the the to the We infrastructure term. recoverable through years, long to growth a bill be use years at and of XX% of key increases unlocking forward is mechanisms for expect least through over annual driving the to
to John and to further over our plans financial it results detail. John? hand cover I'll that, With in