start in morning. and FAP-XXXX at for highlight expected of were Good key Thanks, for clinical summary that data a presented SNMMI milestones I'll the with the term. Pat. clinical near the FAP-XXXX
our and used in both targeted reminder, study, an candidate agent enter the theranostic. program. protein, is radiotherapy activation clinical targeting is FAP-XXXX FAP-XXXX development and the FAP, the agent I/II is imaging As known or therapeutic peptide-targeted Phase first as -- agent therapy a fibroblast and LuMIERE a program In often quick radionuclide as imaging lead to a development ongoing
attached allow FAP-XXXX PET, to isotope patients the imaging tomography, positron is agent, the For selection inclusion and of to gallium-XX study. for emission or the in imaging
a that in dose gigabecquerels activity. lutetium X.X partial recommended FAP-XXXX. generally X of II agent, damage of For causes and profile of in in a four in pretreated therapeutic will FAP-XXXX cancer or the X.X dose moderate among is confirmed The third data the the Overall, gigabecquerels the per lowest labeled planned of in ionizing and agents schedule mild were radiation of manageable the lutetium-XXX cell with X.XX attached first included and safety the found study of the patients adverse events that administrations investigational demonstrated death. Phase dose safety RECIST The at cohort ongoing response The lutetium-XXX, presented Treatment-emergent patients safety of SNMMI of cohorts. dose evidence completed and FAP-XXXX. activity allowed who X a XXX identify heavily dose is DNA particle emitter early evidence the to appendix I population treated to X targeting the of FAP-XXXX. cohorts patient be beta an ongoing. isotope of LuMIERE Enrollment evaluating FAP-XXXX maximum of the therapeutic the the included FAP X the Phase is received portion to
types. identify gallium-XX for FAP-XXXX a is at with of were imaging imaging agent tumor LuMIERE, labeled II suggested updated is cancer addition patients Hope, Phase from metastatic with promising initiation tool In the study. being Congress patients cancer at is additional I separate the LuMIERE presented led Dr. Thomas with from which EANM the presentation are of FAP-XXXX types this principal in also Dr. solid across in to study, SNMMI. to a by investigator at anticipated Presentation Hope's FAP-XXXX of fourth XX and expansion that investigator-sponsored quarter both XXXX. imaging study a in Phase Annual gallium FAP-XXXX currently UCSF, multiple cohorts PET study, tumors. data and as also range of In of ASCO underway novel studied the data data is is who a the LuMIERE This being
advanced independent in positioned Rubraca the alone we switching we to Phase is Rubraca. newly placebo study evaluate III the ATHENA, setting ATHENA in cancer maintenance of well terms maintenance advantage potential Rubraca of front-line uniquely With believe and in diagnosed ovarian front-line, Now are front-line to a monotherapy X,XXX-patient any two as over the in outcomes: combination same as Opdivo versus setting. of maintenance. Rubraca
all and brief subgroups As investigator consistent mutant U.S. ATHENA-MONO or wild-type primary randomized populations whose the labels. of observed those The the or detailed review seen Rubraca today. BRCA safety call, patients both just current exploratory a the ATHENA-MONO with HRD-negative BRCA type/loss LOH for those versus of assessment Rubraca or Rubraca and is HRD-positive trial, also analysis: improved efficacy in met of with PFS, in was its progression-free be both heterozygosity, high PFS tumors a could wild BRCA monotherapy status survival, tumors: ITT. with in provide A ATHENA-MONO benefit evaluating determined. placebo disease either primary not population and LOH, The versus or monotherapy the with endpoint, within which previous the in we showing HRD-positive placebo, I'll by in on results patients European was
to to and the submit to variation II indication, For third an the we intend quarter. sNDA FDA Type front-line a during EMA
other mature the sNDA. overall encouraging FDA And survival to Drugs the when the front-line that of overall it support study, data more recommended grateful believe results, as that disclosed, use Advisory has the previously have survival overall familiar FDA mature results. the more ODAC survival in of community FDA application. be to we of of an consider trials need also receiving from ATHENA-MONO is has approval the sNDA will and reviewing discussed has indicated If the the the Committee Oncologic that endpoint submit with are setting. an rucaparib for an clinical known may strongly meeting. at the We for we supportive clinical the the sNDA ATHENA-MONO from wait primary data PFS submitted prior we're indicated to As data,
cancer ATHENA-COMBO, Phase Rubraca, Opdivo from data Looking patients. cancer, Rubraca Rubraca the to quarter the versus potential population III ahead XXXX. for to of of introduce front-line Rubraca study only ovarian broad first treatment represents are a ovarian for ATHENA-COMBO to other of monotherapy, for anti-PD-X-containing plus in an of combination time opportunity the the first monotherapy expected the maintenance The readouts regimen in
early provide trial mutations. the fourth prostate is Rubraca's addition, versus androgen therapy patients the current of protocol-specified is III TRITONX with the as potential castrate-resistant Phase to in chemotherapy data patient are the from castrate-resistant second-line with physician's BRCA readout line approval a timing trial and contingent metastatic XXXX. expansion. ATM therapy or in of second-line for Rubraca of both and for a reach cancer This study study the evaluating each larger for In potential lines prostate deprivation the progression-free earlier ATHENA-COMBO in opportunity top cancer or for TRITONX confirmatory occurrence The an quarter of well expected TRITONX in choice upon events. data label cancers. survival ATHENA populations ovarian is prostate as
Now discuss I'll to turn the results. call to financial quarter second over Dan