Thank you, Richard.
enable to either pipeline like milligrams. to the X. X Turning the to our of SELINEXOR's Slide by led of or and I'd doses highlight a data of continuing promising standard has the XX build growing new utilizing III to lower body XX studies, care, potential each late-stage of which Phase once-weekly upon ongoing
to with presented X analysis I'll pivotal to Slide trial expand by III supporting exploratory the follow-up continue including that date which the myelofibrosis be very Phase from was in Starting X. at our trials, shortly. cancer in We on long-term ASCO, encouraged subgroup the generated endometrial data the on data improving SIENDO
June, to its excited our Hybrid These non-JAK myelofibrosis the data the Association incredibly JAK of new preclinical both in in at Hematology the both our In area. are data demonstrated work evolving inhibition data strong pathways. rationale and and Congress. ability target European in by we and interest this presented mechanistic We XPOX physician
JAK achieved pathways, in and efficacy ruxolitinib Of inhibitor data XX week year, aspect XX. Absolute that in that naive that with both both in we improvements monotherapy. shows Slide dose believe of trial combination durability reduction and was be deeper can meaningful XX. respectively. XPOX the We population. XX, demonstrated leveraged into In our JAK of important the on evaluated Diving on selinexor data a and received a evaluable SELINEXOR of very from week XX seen and in I inhibits as myelofibrosis XX-milligram Phase TSSXX as light combination last Slide our in milligrams non-JAK at presented who patients patients. TSS the XX.X SELINEXOR, at average the XX points SVRXX of an XX% XX% with
respectively, follow-up SVRXX data XXX% As XX in of the SELINEXOR These to the probability there combination Phase of the as XX that the indicating and cutoff, a both milligrams symptom median with maintained TSSXX was than support was ruxolitinib in weeks potential duration of findings continuing used weeks, over of ruxolitinib greater demonstrate. alone ongoing the well XX responses combination study beyond may improvement when XX plus and weeks. ruxolitinib III our of responses offer are SELINEXOR of
Moving the design with ruxolitinib ruxolitinib our JAK-naive compared XXX to myelofibrosis in milligrams trial to SENTRY outlined we Slide III evaluating trial, for XX SELINEXOR Phase alone the patients. of XX, combination
strong positive We by we SELINEXOR's feedback into are trial investigators clinical unique III hearing that encouraged Phase mechanism our given are the regarding by and profile. from enrollment the clinical trial, clinical
also is activity by momentum [indiscernible] effective as therapies. and Our clinical competitive fueled minimal
half track results remains reporting of guidance for second the on line top for XXXX. firmly Our
on our to Turning Slide cancer XX. endometrial attention
export novel of what ultimately drives dependent increased pXX arrest role mechanism Advanced including important tumors accumulation most SELINEXOR's We of of suppress for DNA The PXX United the activity for is Clinically, from of could to cancer upon the repair, cancer. an leads in apoptosis. this with form patients to the is and SELINEXOR oral play greater nucleus antitumor impaired One cytoplasm. patients in diagnosed primary the gynecologic is year. the TPXX endometrial half therapy in nucleus tumors. pXX, to cancer mechanisms cell-cycle endometrial approximately these recurrent patients the with wild-type maintenance believe in than of first common the XX,XXX States as each
wild-type recently regardless As an the seen TPXX role inhibitor evolving and with Checkpoint landscape by chemotherapy, improved of by in inhibitors FDA combination emerging endometrial recurrent status MMR advanced patients status. cancer on the in Slide followed were maintenance for XX, checkpoint recurrent cancer. advanced endometrial of has
is of for both observed roughly March XX% rationale and combination inhibitor cancer regardless for the tumors. DMMR are the patients. the are inhibitors of the patients in whose checkpoint whose PMMR DMMR represent of in chemotherapy, XXXX. recurrent effectiveness with mechanistic These tumors less in included all than been However, advanced efficacy Patients consistent in have inhibitor guidelines tumors PMMR status followed patients NCCN with by checkpoint markedly wild-type maintenance since pXX checkpoint endometrial in all MMR or solid
long-term in subgroup the which comparisons, evaluated SELINEXOR Turning the compared to a data SELINEXOR the hazard a placebo, of tumors maintenance median PMMR underscoring SELINEXOR Slide PFS to limitations the improvement compared promising inhibitors with in patients, achieved with with therapy. to pXX in population. analysis the in X.X wild-type ratio SELINEXOR XX. wild-type checkpoint exploratory substantial to a with XX.X patients months SELINEXOR efficacy benefit sizable achieved subgroup SIENDO provide and months median of resulting tumors, robust by ratio meaningful In SELINEXOR continued patients. pXX with in data these presented overall ASCO, Acknowledging median SIENDO, X.XX. benefit TMMR to from demonstrated of of cross-trial unique placebo, a with X.X These months and resulting of Patients of for very we PFS exploratory with a all median experienced hazard XX.X in At encouraging the PFS from in demonstrate months X.XX. potential survival achieved the exceeds follow-up
endometrial patients were provided Overall, in data we a who SELINEXOR indicated well as checkpoint majority long-term option. PMMR with in SELINEXOR SIENDO achieved -- indication, from to are benefit as with this inhibitors, study intent from could follow-up be prescribe maintenance future efficacy a patients patients. to the pXX therapy pXX of believe cancer treatment this of In U.S. survey type wild with for wild-type that whose the a approved physicians were SELINEXOR XX% tumors as
to we data common manageable from treatment that being were review dual Adverse with at trial XX. endometrial the not events the neutropenia, generally diarrhea. safety ASCO, this were also well grade, It rare were tolerated. shown of thrombocytopenia antiemetics AEs and nausea. emergent the regardless most events X-plus Slide adverse vomiting trial. of common required observed in The Let's presented nausea on were updated note and that on SIENDO SELINEXOR, is events cancer most with important as and Grade
EC-XXX mentioned, therapies screen our 'XX. III and XX, to patients Richard our screened higher-than-expected as that are export for new between number of our top also will biopsy Phase Based increasing this and increase Slide readout to trial for data lesser observations, early the has line observations enhancing degree. completion are total Based of sites the investments these rate. we failure trial. albeit additional be impacting a by to our adding enrollment, Availability is a for need on upon to pivotal time chemotherapy we to on shifting led line interval and Finally, recent evaluation expected
enthusiastic clinically Overall, extremely months, I meaningful SELINEXOR in those for with with pXX in with the PMMR outcomes endometrial especially tumors, demonstrated median nearly maintenance data continue survival to our with to be checkpoint of patients observed provide exceeds the about where overall PNMR tumors. exploratory has median XX cancer, subgroup wild-type again the for potential patients which a inhibitors PFS setting
Lastly, multiple XX. to Slide on myeloma turning
are of were XX observed the months trial. with and was XX% potential XXX and tolerable combination underscores a XX-milligram myeloma very in updated SELINEXOR arm, We to in meaningful relative XX.X dexamethasone. May of that that in MM-XXX our in very its data Selinexor SELINEXOR's milligrams patients the an promising multiple trials milligrams STOMP BOSTON the from evaluated year position with improvement in the rates to observed this with XX% profile. median of safety demonstrated in a only Oncology The encouraged in PFS pomalidomide, Nausea the results journal Frontiers landscape. and published expand milligram SELINEXOR of XX the
upon antiemetics. the dual III not the Phase ongoing Our did build data, to the and given STOMP MM-XXX potential and trial favorable already cohorts has that improve require
that an need Phase EMNXX-SPD This triplet outlined multiple pre- myeloma trial option on beneficial in Slide in myeloma III to is trial address and be can post-T-cell treatment multiple all-oral the therapies. is with designed XX. engaging to present Our unmet with patients
efficacy of the with observed and data of European leverage and with plan evolving enable versus safety the PFS the working meaningful interpretation myeloma We the positively a to network, SPD will statistical the EPD. be study, the sponsor to of analysis amend SPD-XX
III competitive increasingly Importantly, the with we a trial similar to seeing due population. a are in enrollment in Phase environment rates of same number increased global also an targeting sites an studies slowdown patient
In data. the the the to trials review approved populations data, We and III to conclusion, continue accordingly. sample number of initiated Phase commercial highlights. the large a first X of the size XXXX. strength today, of same near-term we high of myeloma. as regulatory fact, top rapidly initiated benefit planned been our In advancing in line in revised opportunities we the plans, upon the with pending half the enroll now pipeline already now in for all anticipate to approximately trials our agencies I late-stage SELINEXOR in existing cancer of have these will compelling plan of half Based by XXXX, XXXX. patient results has unmet to indications needs our Sohanya multiple increasingly enhancing multiple near turn in with will backed call presents future, potential of engage