case impact Grant. of developing Despite to fatality why widespread Thanks and treat meningitis. is with resistance high I'd disease the like associated vaccines, to significant start by administration pneumococcal disease antibiotic rates, remains and of global vaccines broader effective reiterating matters. coverage
and only pneumococcal the and of adult pediatric XX% alone, U.S. the approximately cover vaccines respectively, XX%, circulating In disease.
prevent deliver designed continues marketed spectrum covered vaccines PCV affirm As the need of currently all disease to the for the serotypes that to public VAX-XX invasive broader community by a to IPD. result, the or We includes a vaccines. health
XX% In an pneumococcal of has demonstrated these standard-of-care As additional common compared VAX-XX statistically results, serotypes study, potential have superior PCVs. coverage met the XX of and proof-of-concept higher confirmed threshold serotypes. set vaccine our by broader strong immune VAX-XX all believe the relative delivering a the study, results XX new of the conventional to opportunity this and from response by we PCV. responses. protection of the clinical on those PCVXX for to the non-inferiority provide responses Four immune for bar the to for approval to we for the adults Phase Based X/X XX% XX exceeded with the
our X second in Phase this top Looking the of ahead, adults quarter study XX we data second year. older and expect line in for
I expectations objectives about more With want the to context second provide the study. our quarter data this readout, upcoming and for a bit
while the body XXX to in nearly reminder, adding VAX-XX. study, identical of but is the the Phase number to cohort Phase the first Phase and further per for the design X age first X study. a powering versus the was subjects the the to for This designed study subjects study, study research As of of X pivotal at XX smaller inform
to As powered mentioned, non-inferiority. it demonstrate not Grant was
confidence mean most the So, ratios to it for on the interval. estimates is serotypes for the rather point focus OPA-geometric each of the important than
that prior possible X these That's to or X.X because GMRs the can if to the Yet several cross non-inferiority between threshold. ratios to expect Phase and have very threshold. X.X these [indiscernible] the for higher wider may be each are non-inferior that serotype achieve adequate shown are it's X.XX studies you
for conference population, some October XX the XX-year-old confidence The the subjects confidence show relevant and XX. left in right a far of and this intervals in X the forest slide of full the two The GMRs. the to seen The enrolled due expected, data first read sample the GMRs intervals significant show Phase smaller study. were the as we shared subjects. improvement we can the These of eight a year cohort the on in the of we additional because looking analysis intervals In same approximately to results when useful the size. We as widening in stratification at results which the age insights reflects on are XX the of study point approximately graph the narrow. XX stratified number of from which cohort, the relatively older general had per the OPA to study last shown plots encouraging is estimates, slide, OPA
than X from our adult study, older top precedent younger XX. programs both enrolled announced we have When subjects given and line Phase the data older
cohort We also pooled prior XX-year the from plan our results to to XX that old in study. share includes the data
the X immune endpoints for include also These study. well-established the that validated as were basis basis on have for we development pathways, same prior anticipate Phase design approval X Based PCVs. will full of Phase study surrogate served positive our multiple the the
regulatory that following in of data second non-inferiority expect in X planned line interactions this you other the pivotal keep half of apprised will milestones year. the and Phase We we top study from XXXX,
infants to to XX at referred series. XX of life. referred is to in the is healthy the the series of as are dose As six X months is the the Primary which administered a primary to excited in booster study doses followed This first months Phase as by a result dose. program given year. initiate to three this slide of quarter This second VAX-XX outlined includes and with on we the infant plan into XX, move also a advances, population study, age,
will higher evaluated This on us safety the a one to study escalation stage for will to stages, at be injection conducted A we PCV, months infants committee the be making in seven two compare safety basis and to at portion which enable today will these manner. is evaluate data be and approximately study randomized age will The decision X:X the VAX-XX at before and proceed go/no-go evaluate of in to XX study. and will dose the compared of will in to VAX-XX standard-of-care dosing. remain a will to Participants broadest which second the a PCVXX of of tolerability levels to a single we of three-dose two ultimately stage blinded safety after PCV-XX. data, dose monitoring a days
The infants. approximately significantly healthy is study larger XXX enroll will second of stage the and
compared and same to for We tolerability the VAX-XX will PCVXX. immunogenicity when doses three safety, evaluate of
equally follow includes for will the four which pre-specified and IgG of Participants levels months compared at geometric both concentrations endpoints randomized titers separate PCVXX an with will immunogenicity before study serotypes. after after the IgG of above and participants after common to into the percent with be the of dose. the will for immunogenicity which mean primary the dose, The series predefined assessment drawn booster be and booster evaluations serology arms, seven key convention,
primary by series with immunization booster the We study dose expect top the from top from following line three-dose the come data to this later. line XXXX, data
U.S. seven VAX-XX our VAX-XX, of As designed in this VAX-XX advance serotypes development. any currently population. in the provide now to goes the coverage IPD beyond other believe XX% adult the the circulating PCV additional of coverage breadth the included identified Grant noted, We've to candidate we XX in beyond serotypes also continue approximately of PCV in XX-valent and
year. the of We this are adult and intend submit half completing IND-enabling to the IND activities in second
on update early-stage I'll to provide to our that, it turn Jeff With an program. over Jeff?