from Thank and you, will reported with summary provide a means Scott. our recently starting I Today, clinical continued paltusotine. we the development, the programs what for of this results
out trial or Therefore, highly As that are the primary was the out already the liver IGF-X.Participants set evaluate and I excess study.In study achieved The IGF-X for than less PATHFNDR-X or we of was paltusotine maintained endpoints, statistical of participants X insulin-like like equal while the patients the to XX to maintain Phase only at in or difference to endpoint. with of PATHFNDR-X statistically patients statistically designed than previously patients into who patients This those group this levels, In proportion growth therapy significant with the markedly. rose this X.XXXX. we who switched this a p-value of who is biochemical Scott of placebo.Magnitude maintain trial symptoms secondary remarkable goals saw on results X to III baseline than to to or and per acromegaly XX nanogram less already significant compared maintain clinically milliliter. of paltusotine limit using primary important factor excess a of our paltusotine to of the of in the oral than XX our hormone X and the in study, at limit from growth statistically all fit-for-purpose diary, normal. And mentioned, levels baseline treated received level a acromegaly Participants primary goal paltusotine this in of September, to endpoint X.XXXX. or normal endpoint with p-value in of IGF-X placebo.We in receiving control. IGF-X reported placebo we therapy Acromegaly, this the upper the all difference of secondary IGF-X, injectable proportion I'd patients levels trial In able a Change the achieved significance. injectable growth X, of significant change symptom biochemically paltusotine. of And times levels was secondary on with dive compared paltusotine all for was the paltusotine the hormone, pre-specified participants to were as is secrete less reiterate X%, and X had XX%, also upper data, control highly also acromegaly to SRL -- acts meet endpoints.Before in of metrics times equal SRL on endpoints. and controlled less
control p-value symptom difference is paltusotine compared score.Participants increase significant, of overall symptom was an to addition, by overall diary, baseline, group. as ASD symptoms, control ASD their measured or using In maintained reported the placebo The from This was the by receiving X.XX. the total a of with as statistically measured acromegaly score.
significant growth levels.SRLs of with Treatment currently study.The therapy, patients and participants PATHFNDR-X the statistically by X populations data level to normal with for through once biochemical in not treatment the is XX% we demonstrate X.XXXX.We're agent the nanogram milliliter first-line on the These because treat meaningful IGF-X burdened very paltusotine issued maintenance placebo. acromegaly population with have symptom convenient of injections. includes depot is who p-value in those The acromegaly, maintained about trial; published than daily the here the evaluating XXXX, medical are that therefore that of firstly, therapy medical limit have acromegaly, currently control results who very hormone are guidance greater option This that interest: of Finally, a measured treated to compared active than show for as XX% currently these have in per are receiving patients elevated active SRL our were oral maintains development a levels of as that levels in are range.In a goal difference are also durable population currently that evaluated was that lowering used patient IGF-X. IGF-X untreated in on FDA and less new drugs X who identified demonstrated the for PATHFNDR-X highly upper an normal. most studies effectively excited practice the disease population January in IGF-X lowering paltusotine can monotherapy when the clear of direct of treatment by secondly, acromegaly
objective treated SRL proportion benefited with from end compared achieved the normal with minority primary treatment. of but IGF-X. among objective a which PATHFNDR-X. of are at medical patients untreated it It potentially of treatment of those not start is with possible the demonstrate Although a This naive of only range is statistically was an will who to patients is paltusotine who IGF-X the wide particularly majority therapy, normalize, of patients, baseline that placebo with studies previous that of purposes, therapy.For IGF-X actually out in PATHFNDR-X predict regulatory subjects greater to same known primary elevations on normalize to the to
normal note patients that PATHFNDR-X patients than known in rate that study absolute elevations a the drug the that IGF-X at in monotherapy wide of the has who population. injections the at achieve in estimate important PATHFNDR-X placebo normalization this should first-line should on to overall to the were at normal than in IGF-X population.Remember, have similarly IGF-X PATHFNDR-X would However, And best group.This show this be of it baseline. therapy. that the of lower observed PATHFNDR-X data, able in all is to approximately with indicate that this the rate be to a different paltusotine SRL expected Based expected compete expected have published IGF-X is XX%. power would is patient to our end of percentage on to as effective injected be normalization population on PATHFNDR-X is SRLs baseline. It be range treatment to
the we that an this and disease serotonin intestine. perhaps key and X are production secondary the are experience syndrome reduction open-label PATHFNDR-X of patients practice, currently well-tolerated the new be this relevant tumor patients burden. first-line diarrhea acromegaly. symptom paltusotine oral treating in syndrome, you is half we've consistent in initial paltusotine. complement was participants. The also normalization previous month. promising enrolls SRL results results, the endpoint to XX a commonly achieved we who we in for to reported most indication, from in from prior total carcinoid patient paltusotine either showing line top carcinoid to II trial that in sharing syndrome XX we will patients of can reduce to with what by a that is from the for a in first PATHFNDR-X indication our included with enrolled carcinoid ongoing pre-specified brief caused from completed results total with in December with that us enrollment and PATHFNDR-X.In of II syndrome, participants. with other and In would Phase arises therapy, Phase participants, neuroendocrine PATHFNDR-X is no ] medical Although anticipated is untreated, look out are and with would clinical or safety fully is syndrome parallel-group hope target second the safety the injections next wash that goal baselines treatment, symptoms entry. results of even with IGF-X interest, And more to to point year.From is Paltusotine's this top to-date. from paltusotine seek and allow expect open-label PATHFNDR-X treated, that December, with The [ The elevated the studies. line flushing.Our of the actively SRL or presented enrolled of originate population paltusotine results SRLs key naive to on full compete We are treatment a their The are broad XXX a initial forward willing ongoing This study trial.As therapy controlled small is seen this findings, in study factors. results view, as who is well. in and tumors reminder, symptomatic, Carcinoid are in study the
who pharmacokinetics in experience very patient prior have already remains experienced one XX% a symptoms per frequency movements see day study paltusotine addition, with consistent to greater the population data.So and reductions meaningful baseline, flushing bowel In X movement is even in in pleased to with who what flushing in carcinoid these patients from far, associated reduction the this key XX% reduction associated in look a healthy episodes, also than events the volunteers. at per or of In is bowel expected in We're we observed syndrome, bowel patients paltusotine also X with movements more excess episodes. the entered and with at initial day. excess
study the dose pre-specified increase symptom patients on opportunity design, dose. their the the required initial participants an time of had based part the in criteria.However, analysis of As in to up-titrate the at study few of paltusotine
we to in we're first response. be paltusotine observe believe exploratory year.Based SRL and Results this data look reported an results correct and is far, anticipated and acting data will results, of initial we final of set think of and will top endpoints range forward the reviewing thus this. believe analyzed full like which half provide terms in in full we the symptom with on results. line its We're this supplemental So, ability confirm relief, are the excited the the a to to other biomarker about
a dose, including discussions.Our of We discuss XXXX endpoint a of the you will timing II FDA congenital design III development an and that CAH XX,XXX receptor CAH. the cortisol to the details, ] androgen.As or an to of adrenal participants U.S. is have overstimulation open-label updating development, which the patients to is study in primarily antagonist, production candidate adrenal affects causes CRNXXXXX. of Classic At submit production. resulting sequential in Phase overproduction had is second at CAH. adrenal adrenal for causes meeting. and XXXX genetic of with directly This stage disorder the of this XXXX. impaired normalize these forward in high registration, is Phase we've in are treatment look we an safety being following on interested hyperplasia, currently end to ACTH of These XXXX [ ACTH antagonist act in at excess designed dose We NOA studied the ACTH. the gland final pharmacokinetics levels androgen to trial evaluating patients data II approximately paltusotine in cortex, once ACTH is Phase
of in the we're and interested data or in carcinoid from in data will December, is presented this an a to to Phase to However, be in report We plan also data review participants. the initial data, is from patients.With pharmacodynamics, will This how over of Marc second in acting using at we measured quarter will enrolled we biomarker give hand XXXX primarily full androstenedione, hope XXXX. not II the CAH, initial CAH early of looking number AX.Similar the study of a for open-label picture now that, it it how but small I financials. us syndrome the