call Earnings our Year operator, I'm joined you, Quarter Third Thank Fiscal the by welcome, Holdings and Conference Call. Organogenesis Financial Officer. to today Dave XXXX everyone, on Chief Francisco,
above XXXX, end in of quarter for for well guidance which Let operating recent outlined a then in-depth up high we quarter press revenue and updated review and a during the before financial will some you of prepared agenda balance this for our condition our developments with sales strategic We with of our review on delivered review brief what we will then third the open with I end as sheet cover questions.
Beginning financial share afternoon. overview thoughts on second key quarter results call. results, update our QX. we'll revenue results closing our remarks. an of third months. results the Dave financial as and guidance in our an of range an start release our provide our me our quarter I'll at call
continued marketplace. productivity in execution Our disruption better-than-expected team's resulted in the despite strong
reflect what momentum of focused customer business We right trends, results results of we to during improving quarters represent quarter were guidance have challenging team the believe in the have quarter. first underlying our assumed and the Our on third excess see our pleased we had in the in better-than-expected revenue to XXXX commercial the evidence operating demand clearest delivered navigate through that the we of strategy environment. this each X third
the months.
We've second secondary function and of of important XXX Turning towards progress announced to key Phase our during patients also we initiatives prospective on X of quarter. X patients, XXX expectations. pain the a the first we required knee a the our timing completed controlled The original group results saline patients. more the significant our statistically ahead met the by study. our multicenter X clinical of clinical On August quarter. additional and in XXX statistically enrolled strategic trial, trial We third expectations third progress ReNu parallel of of results multicenter notably, than meeting maintenance well from enrollment at Phase of primary endpoint first in significant the And the randomized safety X, XXX trial double-blinded review reduction the efficacy for clinical the of clinical study endpoint a made by evaluating
aspects while X required As Monitoring size. or DMC that directional trial results blinding. the Data increase second for the maintaining announced trial interim the for the recommended The sample and all study provided in a interim XX% Phase received the of first without proceed without rigorously DMC, of on the guidance modification separate our outcome analysis, trial. analysis patients press pre-specified to Independent in The release, a the favorable we of of Committee,
ReNu. safety DMC the safety for the with profile be consistent the known to data found Additionally,
and large to clinical need continue transformational affects if than suffering degenerative unmet will We believe an ReNeu Americans. for OA, that XX management address We joint for a symptomatic the that million market patients approved, ReNu, introducing more opportunity potentially believe represents a if growing all to Organogenesis. disease pain from approved, knee
We road biologic our on we would deliver to the by for map symptomatic ReNu submission line successful, symptoms ReNu to If the of are OA. clear injection improve only time BLA have a knee related and end XXXX. and QX BLA the to submission, pain be track FDA-approved ReNu intra-articular
NuShield on of X, standard care probability to standard share weeks. X and the XX% in X frequency superior of weeks we NuShield demonstrated validation turning recent of Dave, study and a DFUs to Before closure decreased of wound treatment from Journal coverage. X the the of groups, care. On with total of compared over time from reimbursement median publication XXX at a NuShield the to intervals to update greater October XXX-patient announced group our compared in Wound robust standard results of progress wound a XX demonstrated call wanted NuShield alone.
The clinical the were when A of statistically wound of challenging Medicare I to into to brief randomized areas and of care standard of or care complete closure patients closure, plus Care.
a in that rates, provides pleased and associated crisis especially data populations. are severe leads underserved We advantage this amputation a often demonstrates when significant medical DFUs, to mortality higher NuShield managing
our on for outlined not treatment data believe was which letter draft the the latest DFU we of for the LCD, included published MACs high-quality earnings call, our evaluating meets the in NuShield considered evidence that comment demonstrates that As NuShield criteria to and coverage. this all
approach support we and the requirements field, this the satisfies these wounds publication this peer-reviewed to under for coverage medical proposed LCD. coverage in leader CMS' large believe for serious evidence-based a As
the and and the for was effectiveness includes Theraskin, a and draft draft coverage LCD Our from VLUs comment meet to comparative of in a This DFU patients PuraPly real-world existing study XXX literature and for of as supporting data and XXXX review PuraPly published patients Medicare LCD included clinical shows data our the treatment case of also non-inferiority high-quality letter completed, AM proposed cover. XT well. PuraPly for XT published the data to XXX supporting a AM the requirements coverage for that which product after May PuraPly
policy for Medicare products skin not access. substitutes made status In hospital pricing clinical look our impact about payment goal PuraPly in of of quo. framework November first these we fee payment physician variations for physician enrolled that what CMS in chronic skin setting under in that noted CMS in rules DFUs.
On proposed is the to changes negatively changes. new standard no the expanding of were third there for gap through August, validation versus maintains framework of its has schedule issued AM-plus study, say for and changes also of In the does to and policies the future any patients substitutes for might the future beneficiary PuraPly consistent the for substitutes achieve RCT, for patient progress the in XXX CMS that our establishment physician the timing quarter. the the like standard any a does of in fee We not outpatient PREPA evaluating or X, more with care care reiterated alone schedule the either CMS the intends payment skin products approach rule fee to rulemaking. rule, in substitute for in CMS skin XXXX. it the final the that department. consistent not final also final payment bridge schedule the
on potential Now they paid Part has skin the value-based fixed a patients the physicians based communicated should system. value-based centimeter substitute where the the best square substantially categories treatments payment patients outcome to for are we improve to methodology Medicare basis. This and to health expenditures, methodology CMS individual have B that a provide care access transition to per and of on patient needs reduce and the enable that prescribe are payment
change the dialogue policy no payment rule policy the recognizing see in CMS of payment were interested benefit continued the included XXXX, While with substitute for rule in changes parties for there commentary skin products rulemaking. final for from to inform to help for substitutes skin future pleased we final on was
products As appreciate to payment the acknowledgment to products. we we of a and the impact in negatively need continue been pleased physician substitute the not with and advocate schedule willingness CMS actively efficacy and particularly to have prioritize does skin consider to continuing leader We MACs under feedback, our substitute framework a with fee the for establish are that will applaud for skin for coverage payment engage the consistent changes demonstrated in requisite our the clinical systems. framework CMS' to market, access.
We to for for the beneficiary
forward the represents towards years have been and believe marketplace. that pushing substantial for reform this a many up cleaning step for proposed LCD We
vocal remain need we given reform. the leadership for position in space, the in support Importantly, active of immediate our and
and potential and and clinical to are to rates congressional stakeholders, for our engaging as are treatment are DFUs health skin comorbidity. to the groups the of as In in impacts MACs, equity changes initiatives we they and and substitutes and associations, offices.
We education and policy including coverage possible higher addition well CMS and all disparity including potential that informed the with we primary with health to industry directed want are the direct parties XX advocacy ensure physicians, leading efforts patient with on considering carefully populations VLUs, impact of the of of diabetes treatment
validation payment the while from our of competitive CMS the changes its established us the in products innovative infrastructure that, taken substitutes, believe care product.
With positioned turn be believe if for are establish commercialized will to opportunity positive us and ultimately Dave. market coverage strong these over commercial represent and let continue transition of clinical me these of our MACs with wound be skin long-term preliminary highly together there and well to disruption We will for sweeping highly has implemented, a a to the plan call secure Organogenesis' maximize we to enormous and brand the period if efficacious substantial key changes to more and patients adopted, coverage serve and that to equity, health of advantage additional the material patients,