call. XXXX everyone, morning, results Good Lauren. you update joining for you, thank financial Thank for us and business and our
of for and highly Our productive start the been have quarter fourth XXXX Humacyte.
the trauma this accepted our BLA in the indication our in and biologics HAV year. completed FDA for of submission the Humacyte of Importantly, February license application vascular in December,
caliber made Phase preclinical results and trial of of heart juvenile HAV small course trial on HAV clinical publication for model. the our dialysis completion in Over XXXX, broader results also disease publication peripheral of in III of access, in the and of the enrollment presentation our we our pipeline, including progress arterial
the up call of results. your the developments During I'll open these call, review Dale today's Then to review happy financial over detail turning we'll to be call to for before questions. a in more our
I'll II/III from supported with by our XXXX, submitted wartime was the evidence In that The robust injuries humanitarian to included data VXXX also Ukraine the we was BLA our vascular the in This December real-world program Phase trauma. FDA. FDA. our under clinical package treatment the included a from of trial. program positive begin in aid HAV supported BLA package that by results
showed lower rates HAV package the and synthetic patency graft historic higher that had of amputation benchmarks. and infection data compared Our rates as of to
X/X which grafts. XX% trials the These of vascular XX.X% combined, York. were compared as at provided who also their was to words, presentations X.X% surgery compared XX-day rates injury. HAV suffer an which synthetic lower meeting were grafts. flow is in synthetic November blood at XX.X% have other for for infection after patency to month, with amputation and infection only grafts. synthetic for historically the as The HAV the an HAV likely at compared with graft. to were as furthermore, the conduit recovery likely VEITHsymposium, X multiple as to their HAV key X/X period patients lose reported the the In for extremity And as of treated the lower held major demonstrated a is flow also a to HAV of a historically likely with or rate only to for through compared In to treated as patients after X rate also of presence XX traumatic for patients XX.X% amputation X.X% days, blood where a synthetic New graft in with had rates results only X.X% patients
review designation The granting of of also August In a accepted Defense vascular XX, and patients reflects are and the given a of by review their personnel. regenerative of are the User of that or action the standards prevent injuries FDA's XXXX, review designation for also with or or Priority to this the FDA's BLA serious trauma, the our American recognition that severe review treat care. their FDA under a to that February Prescription of Secretary life-threatening grant establishing RMAT current aligns with priority goal priority prior underserved for expedite by Act, to military Drug enacted arterial facing diagnose, the decision repair. conditions with XXXX. urgent PDUFA therapy law priority medicine that date consistent Fee many products also is grant are We advanced intended believe for was HAV
vascular data the goal injury. Ukraine, strength The humanitarian our trauma, the are the Based look to on forward with for trial to BLA the regenerative us acceptance product of brings date providing with our package, VXXX step in of vascular in patients who experience closer another we combined an traumatic from medicine confidence. suffering from data innovative PDUFA
dollars to of traumatically care for drive in health HAV trauma strategy. an outcomes, commercial it's of Humacyte been developed derived U.S. we uptake market complications even upon system. In Health conduit are help benefits believe, the out revolutionary thousands well tens provide from databases of economic as of preparation FDA candidate will, infection, product of build this anticipated of benefits injured for is economic historical national sepsis approval, also care of can the Costs Avoidance these extremely team the important injury cost costly Based as the for patients. synthetic are of care. health and the our which results the models traumatic amputation or important adding clear as to in that care hundreds part to high working large of go-to-market have graft
end treated investigator-sponsored being conducted Clinic is peripheral disease. limb-threatening artery Mayo stage presented an the in In the program clinical the FDA-regulated were that's our of results of patients the to now PAD. chronic with Most study as fall, surgery not a needed procedures. ischemia, at HAV in not Turning typically and bypass patients which which from type did suitable procedure. treated the of is and their bypass below of Treated of the patients is vein with knee, to angioplasty a have program well disease stents required that perform own part
lower And critically to so limbs. their received the revascularize HAV ischemic
to observed VEITHsymposium the salvage and is requiring resilient This that for approximately in do since Vascular the have at and XX% important saphenous limb Conference, an did the available the effective flow. arterial vein presentations not patients restore In a of who was vein in a bypass to result researchers HAV at patients study, clinical conduit for extremity conduit bypass lower and blood have Midwestern revascularization. provide safe, not
showing X.X-millimeter cellular Thoracic this millimeter to With Journal condition is in described by repopulation been every remained Fallot. each similar study In regard Columbus, which in XXXX, to researchers large that the HAV affects patients. from in Hospital model a animal X year. the months Cardiovascular potential publications, investigational HAVs study, up October heart in host and of preclinical preclinical and publication diameter human of long-term a small is heart observed U.S. in Tetralogy a patent In cells, the these Surgery for born treat of This the X,XXX into disease. animals, juvenile the Nationwide Ohio, a to to pediatric diameter in implanted for evidence X.X HAVs of what's X in of follow-up Children's babies showed
more adding manufacturing demonstrated heart that extension study also platform, a Humacyte's than The the the manufactured of the for vessels X-millimeter been decade. pediatric vessels to X.X-millimeter have
our X-month human coronary this evaluated preclinical data And bypass. As clinical implantations support long-term trials the in excellent vessels in in filing artery reported artery reminder, We've a in large currently support in previously into are IND to coronary X.X-millimeter an gather large in being bypass animals, studies year heart of HAV surgery. continuing of as advancement future results IND-enabling are bypass cardiac animals. we in
a the The as scientific synthetic structure may had native-like have to of the Researchers HAV These cells. conditions. basis infection all rate. that immune of of a implications Vascular that study compared zone study be observed results in a to preclinical of graphs medical rates published the body to further limitations the infection potential for of of lower and Surgery, due This Journal low the the synthetic found tissue have that significantly results were HAV for HAV's wide provides the trials with indications July, clinical our also supports Science. bacterial resistance a solution HAV's intended superior broad the a range of In graphs, compatibility in our Vascular support been in infection HAV.
of review I'll that, Dale over and turn our business results it a now development. other with financial for to And