add to much quarter But quarter. Matt. of going had was don't stronger we to beginning The actually is to at I we where anticipated what read want than Thanks, that. the little even very Matt's to Okay. I'm a had This comments. too the have quarter anticipated into
to year. the As the rest Matt going of for said, cautious we're be
as of are. we All carefully customers are spend our watching their
as smaller was year-to-year ones, or From the whom turmoil overall not banking large in as strong good, not ago a very of comparisons overall clients, offerings. today We a repeatable. perspective, a going we on The is it we in we likelihood new all the the with new live XXXX to be be Every even name of even the not sector. to six have quarter would grow months due quarter a ago, larger said continue that as an have to big of license hope future. had revenue the new business big was customers previously to record year conversion bring albeit
but diminished have We're having the for how appetite radar. conversations the to No surely lasts. believe under those they'll XX% one to couple is under We've banks for knows and XX%. We'll even remain are of that regional risk long go I still just see we prefer banks really major pricing gun as speak. the regional outcome a stock now as the seen the banks today down greatly
impact does that us. So
but right We how have bank and sure. don't what do as a be we're kind big have saying have things develop. are smaller two, I anything see see will talking – folks We you may now this year of for that can live going just
will -- I'm have then e-mail I'd before going conclude I my for him on questions. recommendations the It a an a question And got which ISS – going comment we you and comments I'm open I shareholder. share yesterday. was I from that my vote to with answers it to thought gave
one questions on not the asked So well the our Matt, an many being and there's shareholders e-mail call. of or said before yesterday send day
answer So have you this? would guys the answers. be I seen willing to
for the And here Apple CoreCard? CoreCard savings option of the questions. involve use software? if so Does impact is what So the there
that gathering, is in by the not Apple card used option. involved for savings but answered saying I directly credit Apple
to card to add X.XX% will so offering You helps credit of course savings number that the cards. a and have increase to get account I savings. with benefits they're CoreCard have of more the do cards
more added want cards So that to people causing is grab as Goldman. at to that savings definitely be
software? CoreCard? And what Apple. The CoreCard is answered the use to above. it. Second, Pay Now question for so Later is similar but I question tough go I there not with and was Buy a does directly involved option the for the Apple if is might next read one, impact CoreCard BNPL involve of
profits of the in working the engineers CoreCard? are So past to the months of are they such percentage hired contributing XX what software that directly net
engineers So this is engineers not you're hiring and still as that hiring they answerable, really or revenue-producing separate was my the making you're was, question are that are variety hired the think directly tasks of in answer people we tasks. not for a I money? do are
customers For working example, that will on of things are immediate that largely on and maintenance. pay and our license longer-term the have projects percent other maintenance us benefit others a as impact some license engineers
answer, then to free And the is upgrade two of being CoreCard's free don't more income significantly questions. One upgraded to is the expect streams completed? do how flow in you And cash cash separate develop when much the used flow. My the you be software?
So again answerable. not
never complete. Software in is this business
the to diversion. fully year, three least and years have maybe some this more We of but be at using a will new software be it two will
for used. over the be on new are pricing. finally, was still believes to will its the have lower will bidding advantage plus operating years management business be would software benefit though also competitive My but new provide new will functionality bullets answer, older significant be business. And made significant The no is how competition? CoreCard should attracting competitive three that There question costs even new and which in silver as software only not a features last software are required be out much for software the creating advantageous the decisions competitive advantage to or upgrade
said which taking find name. me I He I you So straightforward your if -- to answer we -- thanks answers my for see to the I his candor. I give my could which appreciate got and a said that surprising. thought let time response will He question. was
and the to Your brick when Atlanta shareholder's stock first company you're XX I ago. was bought moved stated said call. letter the conference I Then he to building years I around get forward I brick. by the look -- this
you say our long-term to questions thank thank the shareholders. for I will long and So also many you of
really a around we for the a long sense I who've unusual think stayed we're bunch very in that have time.
is about to comment ISS. going next My be
year, this audit the how against vote non-audit out the Committee. not that As institutions simply recommended meetings. institutions a all because certain the minimum. know, for And Audit higher it's also they ratio ISS year they is to the at Chairman annual sends -- the fees of actually but company's shareholders should than to corporate the vote the institutions Last of and recommendations know, on may
Now, we may your sure don't from In different it's agree that. somewhat with keep to you consulting fees on here. good and it's weigh completely pay separated in Matt and and policy audit case, frankly auditors totally our to make
fees Just to give $XXX,XXX, but past billed audit other you the were were fees an were that our year idea this $XXX,XXX.
companies other compliance are help they're formulas. So site of terms ratio totally is is audit Matt fees that's are $XXX,XXX consulting the processing is and we of that cutoff because reason That though services me have in but means The independent. required These of services. out here not for in greater other $XXX,XXX. $XXX,XXX which fees the their XX-XX than minimum in kind