sure, can A.J., that. answer I
in in-patient, which new we the year, that So growth, predict and from earlier limited are When level medical the to related were to enrollment that on inpatient lot the first the cost information we correct. a we of utilization. fact pressure had seeing of the you attributed that have we cited
our expectations, expected to have we were medical [indiscernible] example. higher So that were risk the score would is on based slightly we seeing indicating. what X than And costs relative were
about were correct So you that.
of being is you the They of you in that so to typically in see than an at November have a rate surprising. in more was level up upheld was what seasonality say processes higher all we've relative authorizations, management increase December. dynamics. and it what you much our typically and particular. well. very expect what saw the we months for than The unrelated different that utilization And would as the short-stay are absolute through of I far and completely seen in quarter December, fourth expected in-patient And widespread. And is more positive would would for November, would much given those the authorization particularly month
Coincidentally, data and still early, on you non the very we're visibility. as get the relying while paid some to is know, claims on in-patient,
indications starting [ We in a decline are observation seeing that November, we are also in ]. seeing days
we So more and sort understand diagnosis to time, better. analyze continue going are before to and But more nature the we we of development quite the about codes that's assess something fully and will other in and need observations and frankly, emission related understand go-forward claim corresponding uptick that again on basis. the any to in in a how then way understand decline they're if think in-patient we things of underlying
benefit, options an level we'll would look in maintain bit given was make disenrolled. fully say, for to to intent and that available. far, say of I the individuals retention the But members richer those And degree probably what would of the were place us certainly might looking from we're benefit early I plan certainly [ too I of see would reductions of concern looked who expect a little other lose certainly benefits a at terms we ] would would be we say I at in what another retention nothing mix versus those have would data. some assess to ones higher highly disenrollment. expect at -- teams so that the terms that did In the 'XX, that at look generally, mix, who enrollment AEP
so about To it 'XX, I would say little differently. bit your question a
fully industry trend not While I agree this with certainly, statement. the our that would was pricing, entire contemplated in think
make we saw industry. bid. that, adjustments did of our benefit unexpected the than We, spite in us more trend of All after though, filed
made, And make look so higher they some level changes a to with. that see in headwinds net the the benefit we adjustments And in earlier you and very at despite other others. talked remember, we the you and cases, incremental of that year STARS did than when dealing in V-XX were 'XX we investment were actual if surprised
terms So 'XX, as but again, we issue in we 'XX our intent higher-than-expected this occurrence of of unfortunately, to benefits But will that, after just a an only in know our of It's don't year, not like of feel we sure late lot be terms XXXX the through persistency underpricing. now, the to trend assume all And based in pricing. were everything evaluate is the XXXX it's filed. and of we trends continue make our that do in to covered on persist those pricing. would learn
