your rights importance. turnout you to special time low heard. voice meeting until has XXXX, necessary was we proposal Thank make to approximately meeting additional have as are we proxies shares on to of for proposals, you, XX% allow special consider Unfortunately, so stockholders, of yet votes vote bought the its the stockholders the very we has Karl X, retail and vote Storz. of is date, a scheduled adjourned To our described merger company the a representing This received merger support with Shameze. the not, to whether of On to each Regardless which not August which on for your merger August we have proceed, shares. outstanding the encourage you of in to our matter stockholders .
The vote meeting and statement. such proxies or adjourned XX. received your to adjourned the exercise proxy the only proposed
reminder, X to consider. there proposals a As are
shares, those proposal and Karl of the approval for from filed on of requires to in outlined outstanding with first company all Endoscopy with acquired shares the just a be the Storz pass majority a way XXXX. vote This proposal this by Inc. SEC adoption our not a Storz The agreement merger Endoscopy the subsidiary yes of with been plan Karl a have and America, approval majority seeks statement X, merger and voted. July To as stockholder into of America that proxy is our of of
proposal, named payable requires vote officers a connection that approval an is is certain first merger. compensation are the the executive present. our this shares that with vote or in majority be advisory that to second from advisory provided voted, paid the a The on of of approval Unlike the quorum may become
adjournments XX:XX outstanding the from special threshold if adjourn rather meeting the for this proposal, and of approval we meeting voted only to X passed Like second agreement. necessary Because to special of requires been approval -- is later had votes, additional vote at Eastern to third a shares. for Tuesday, Time. adopt August of or to reach meeting the the required proposal actually this shares necessary, of that a proposal the or the the board solicit able more majority have a merger postponement the The this all approve proxies to dates, allows than majority date proposal the to were and we a.m. of XX the
on funds to We stockholders recognized Lewis advisory leading who many mutual globally. independent recommendations line from yet voted have over to the as the Glass proposal, who with have Glass Of voted merger, the recommendations the firms, consider firms. for would institutional governance favor are Their the investors. merger and Lewis, corporate approve and major ISS highly voting fiduciaries XX% This including all investment widely the and stockholders encourage shares is potential shares institutional voted merger. large are outcomes. have majority ISS significant and not in the of helped that recommends by in analysis and vote meaningful
capital financial $XX these to Storz pending we the approved, is balance expect payment needed expenses our expenses face The obligations, their on a near-term capital available sum not continue and bankruptcy of merger we we merger operations. sheet. interest note well the also Therefore, fund securitized exceed we merger. including to a if the protection. repayment believe seek of these Karl premiums in are obligations connection as raise significant If have We the incurred approved, to to and not million the as to in transaction do not is funding plus with position
our creditors has Storz that over assets the to note in a over This means to important a assets. a holds assets. stockholders of legal against the It's our ordered. In would for Karl that other bankruptcy collateral in our interest be give debt claim priority and all Storz interest security Storz company's claims Karl security as scenario, Karl
As and the will less we in a distributions all at of the receive believe our result, consideration setting. receive than bankruptcy, not event a bankruptcy in merger may a common stockholders
us emphasize believe a price that to heard have they a get options for stockholders all to we per obtainable reasonably share want the higher from that directors best like higher is get available would to have reasonable stockholders. and us price We our per $X.XX I exhausted than share. $X.XX to price,
Before accepting the Storz acquisitions. potential explored partnerships including and various deal, we alternatives, Karl
the Since company and the April of proposal discussions interest in described we As other X, led has proposal But interest potential solicited expressed statement, offering no a acquirers. proxy partners other from than more transaction this other The Storz, have Karl none price in XXXX, of in available from Storz. offered for higher these is $X.XX fully to on share a best by than investors disappointing, the investment lower given higher available price per Karl than seen current this Karl the especially price may our stockholders' We the reasonably many represents initial understand circumstances. long-term likely who Storz. past. valuations announcement
offer shares. However, that little result or likely recognize to would consideration whereas for some stockholders this crucial bankruptcy in their provides scenario it no return receiving is the
not, vote, whether matters. your single in merger overstate of this importance cannot the I every the stockholder's participation or support vote you
information we've was and vote If X, provided and you which please statement, your with cast haven't soon the in XXXX, today SEC filed voted review proxy the as on possible. July yet, our as
the website, or access proxy can statement our on www.sec.gov You at asensus.com/investors.
to closing, advance tirelessly In gratitude who our continue our mission. express my employees work want deepest dedicated I to to to
your face the ask outcome for for securing possible this war, stakeholders. crucial all we in we As best support
