Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010.
OR
o Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission file number 001-11549
BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | | 63 0780521 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
| | |
4909 SE International Way, Portland, Oregon | | 97222-4679 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(503) 653-8881
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer x |
| | |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of August 2, 2010 there were 47,852,107 shares outstanding of $0.01 par value common stock.
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Blount International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 148,956 | | $ | 114,001 | | $ | 285,639 | | $ | 230,525 | |
Cost of sales | | 96,457 | | 79,362 | | 183,125 | | 158,096 | |
Gross profit | | 52,499 | | 34,639 | | 102,514 | | 72,429 | |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | | 29,758 | | 24,015 | | 58,014 | | 49,186 | |
Gain on sale of land and building | | — | | (2,701 | ) | — | | (2,701 | ) |
Plant closure and severance costs | | — | | 1,365 | | — | | 6,404 | |
Operating income | | 22,741 | | 11,960 | | 44,500 | | 19,540 | |
Interest income | | 50 | | 52 | | 75 | | 155 | |
Interest expense | | (6,407 | ) | (6,425 | ) | (12,926 | ) | (12,356 | ) |
Other income (expense), net | | (18 | ) | 52 | | (31 | ) | 38 | |
Income before income taxes | | 16,366 | | 5,639 | | 31,618 | | 7,377 | |
Provision for income taxes | | 5,923 | | 1,407 | | 12,392 | | 2,188 | |
Net income | | $ | 10,443 | | $ | 4,232 | | $ | 19,226 | | $ | 5,189 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Basic income per share | | $ | 0.22 | | $ | 0.09 | | $ | 0.40 | | $ | 0.11 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted income per share | | $ | 0.22 | | $ | 0.09 | | $ | 0.40 | | $ | 0.11 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares used in per share calculations: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | 47,840 | | 47,747 | | 47,815 | | 47,743 | |
Diluted | | 48,349 | | 48,183 | | 48,339 | | 48,181 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Blount International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
| | June 30, | | December 31, | |
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | |
Assets | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 72,812 | | $ | 55,070 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,673 and $3,339, respectively | | 77,737 | | 74,475 | |
Inventories, net | | 83,502 | | 78,179 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 7,711 | | 5,528 | |
Other current assets | | 16,944 | | 23,962 | |
Total current assets | | 258,706 | | 237,214 | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | 111,588 | | 114,470 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 13,183 | | 16,006 | |
Intangible assets | | 11,609 | | 12,371 | |
Goodwill | | 66,071 | | 66,071 | |
Other assets | | 38,601 | | 37,434 | |
Total Assets | | $ | 499,758 | | $ | 483,566 | |
| | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | $ | 4,924 | | $ | 5,013 | |
Accounts payable | | 31,352 | | 31,539 | |
Accrued expenses | | 56,819 | | 50,614 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 261 | | 501 | |
Total current liabilities | | 93,356 | | 87,667 | |
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities | | 275,498 | | 280,852 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 4,744 | | 4,695 | |
Employee benefit obligations | | 76,807 | | 75,780 | |
Other liabilities | | 39,068 | | 41,312 | |
Total liabilities | | 489,473 | | 490,306 | |
Commitments and contingent liabilities | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity (deficit): | | | | | |
Common stock: par value $0.01 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 47,841,440 and 47,759,331 outstanding, respectively | | 478 | | 478 | |
Capital in excess of par value of stock | | 582,809 | | 581,211 | |
Accumulated deficit | | (537,329 | ) | (556,555 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (35,673 | ) | (31,874 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | 10,285 | | (6,740 | ) |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | | $ | 499,758 | | $ | 483,566 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Blount International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 19,226 | | $ | 5,189 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation of property, plant, and equipment | | 11,087 | | 9,843 | |
Amortization of intangible assets and deferred financing costs | | 2,354 | | 2,881 | |
Stock compensation and other non-cash charges | | 1,503 | | 1,758 | |
Asset impairment charges | | 264 | | 1,987 | |
Excess tax expense (benefit) from stock-based compensation | | (112 | ) | 149 | |
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense | | 67 | | (1,142 | ) |
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets | | 101 | | (2,587 | ) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable | | (5,718 | ) | 12,064 | |
(Increase) decrease in inventories | | (5,740 | ) | 4,641 | |
(Increase) decrease in other assets | | 3,476 | | 2,583 | |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | | 299 | | (8,567 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses | | 7,950 | | (13,477 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | | (2,792 | ) | 3,285 | |
Discontinued operations | | (574 | ) | (534 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | 31,391 | | 18,073 | |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment | | (8,641 | ) | (8,511 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of assets | | 22 | | 3,256 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (8,619 | ) | (5,255 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Net repayments of principal borrowed under revolving credit facility | | (3,400 | ) | (7,000 | ) |
Repayment of term loan principal | | (2,043 | ) | (11,746 | ) |
Issuance costs related to debt | | — | | (1,900 | ) |
Excess tax (expense) benefit from stock-based compensation | | 112 | | (149 | ) |
Proceeds from stock-based compensation activity | | 295 | | 91 | |
Payment of employee taxes on restricted stock | | (333 | ) | (290 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (5,369 | ) | (20,994 | ) |
| | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes | | 339 | | (1,347 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | 17,742 | | (9,523 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | 55,070 | | 58,275 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 72,812 | | $ | 48,752 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Blount International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Amounts in thousands) | | Shares | | Common Stock | | Capital in Excess of Par | | Accumulated Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance December 31, 2009 | | 47,759 | | $ | 478 | | $ | 581,211 | | $ | (556,555 | ) | $ | (31,874 | ) | $ | (6,740 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | | | �� | | | 19,226 | | | | 19,226 | |
Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation | | | | | | | | | | (2,130 | ) | (2,130 | ) |
Unrealized losses | | | | | | | | | | (1,669 | ) | (1,669 | ) |
Comprehensive income, net | | | | | | | | | | | | 15,427 | |
Stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock | | 82 | | | | 74 | | | | | | 74 | |
Stock compensation expense | | | | | | 1,524 | | | | | | 1,524 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance June 30, 2010 | | 47,841 | | $ | 478 | | $ | 582,809 | | $ | (537,329 | ) | $ | (35,673 | ) | $ | 10,285 | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of a deferred tax benefit of $0.7 million and $1.0 million, was $2.3 million and $3.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Other comprehensive income, net of a deferred tax expense of $1.1 million and $0.9 million, was $3.3 million and $1.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Basis of Presentation. The unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Blount International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Blount” or the “Company”) and are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, the Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) for the periods presented.
The accompanying financial data as of June 30, 2010 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 has been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The December 31, 2009 Consolidated Balance Sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. These Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires that management make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We base our estimates on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management is continually evaluating and updating these estimates and it is reasonably possible that these estimates will change in the near term.
Reclassifications. Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications have no effect on previously reported consolidated net income, cash flows, or net stockholders’ equity (deficit).
NOTE 2: RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
Gain on Sale of Land and Building. On June 25, 2009, we sold the land and building representing our former European headquarters and distribution center. These operations have been moved to new, nearby leased facilities. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $2.7 million on the sale.
Plant Closure Costs. In the second quarter of 2009, we closed our manufacturing facility in Milan, Tennessee. Products previously manufactured in that facility are now produced in our other manufacturing facilities. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a total of $0.5 million in plant closure costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a total of $3.8 million in charges related to this plant closure, consisting of $2.0 million in asset impairment charges, $1.0 million in employee severance and benefit costs, and $0.8 million in other expenses. Of these charges, $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, are recognized in cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The land and building are currently being marketed for sale, and are included in assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Severance Costs. We took actions during 2009 to reduce the number of employees at certain of our locations in addition to the Milan facility mentioned above. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a total of $1.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively, in severance charges related to this reduction in force. From December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009, the Company reduced its workforce by approximately 610 positions, or 17%, of its previous work force.
7
Table of Contents
NOTE 3: INVENTORIES, NET
Inventories consisted of the following:
| | June 30, | | December 31, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Raw materials and supplies | | $ | 11,489 | | $ | 11,510 | |
Work in progress | | 13,105 | | 13,095 | |
Finished goods | | 58,908 | | 53,574 | |
Total inventories, net | | $ | 83,502 | | $ | 78,179 | |
NOTE 4: LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
| | June 30, | | December 31, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Revolving credit facility | | $ | — | | $ | 3,400 | |
Term loans | | 105,422 | | 107,465 | |
8 7/8% senior subordinated notes | | 175,000 | | 175,000 | |
Total debt | | 280,422 | | 285,865 | |
Less current maturities | | (4,924 | ) | (5,013 | ) |
Long-term debt | | $ | 275,498 | | $ | 280,852 | |
The weighted average interest rate on outstanding debt as of June 30, 2010 was 7.58%.
8 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes. The Company has one registered debt security, the 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes. The interest rate on these notes is fixed until their maturity on August 1, 2012. These notes are subject to redemption at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at redemption prices of 102.219% through July 31, 2010; and at 100% on August 1, 2010 and thereafter (see further discussion following). These notes are issued by the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Blount, Inc., and are fully and unconditionally, jointly and severally, guaranteed by the Company and all of its domestic subsidiaries (“guarantor subsidiaries”) other than Blount, Inc. All guarantor subsidiaries of these 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes are 100% owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company. While the Company and all of its domestic subsidiaries guarantee these 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes, none of Blount’s existing foreign subsidiaries (“non-guarantor subsidiaries”) guarantee these notes. See also Note 14.
Senior Credit Facilities. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Blount, Inc., first entered into a credit agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation as Agent on May 15, 2003. The agreement was amended and restated on August 9, 2004, underwent several subsequent amendments, and was amended and restated again on December 4, 2009. The senior credit facilities consist of a revolving credit facility and a term loan facility.
April 2009 Amendment to Revolving Credit Facility. On April 30, 2009, we entered into an amendment to the revolving credit facility as follows:
· The maturity date was extended to August 9, 2010.
· We reduced total availability under the revolving credit facility from $150.0 million to $90.0 million.
· The interest rate was increased from the LIBOR rate plus 1.75% or the U.S. prime interest rate, with no minimum, to the LIBOR rate as defined in the credit agreement (the “LIBOR Rate”) plus 5.00% or the U.S. index rate as defined in the credit agreement (the “U.S. Index Rate”) plus 3.25%, with a minimum rate of 7.50%, on all outstanding principal. The Company may elect to borrow amounts under either the LIBOR Rate or the U.S. Index Rate.
· The commitment fee on unused borrowing capacity was increased from 0.375% to 1.00%.
· The Company incurred fees and third party costs of $2.0 million related to the amendment.
8
Table of Contents
December 2009 Amendment and Restatement of Credit Facilities. On December 4, 2009, the senior credit facility was amended and restated as follows:
· The maturity date for both the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility was extended to February 9, 2012.
· We reduced total availability under the revolving credit facility from $90.0 million to $60.0 million.
· The interest rate on the term loan facility was increased from LIBOR plus 1.75% or the U.S. prime rate to the LIBOR Rate plus 3.50%, or the index rate as defined in the credit agreement (the “Index Rate”) plus 2.50%, with a minimum rate of 5.50%. The Company may elect to borrow amounts for specific periods under either the LIBOR Rate or Index Rate.
· The maximum allowed leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, was increased from 4.25 to 4.50.
· Existing term loans representing $3.9 million of the total of $107.5 million term loan principal outstanding at the time were not affected by this amendment and restatement, and the terms for this portion of the term loans remain unchanged, including interest at the prime rate and a maturity date of August 9, 2010. The principal amount of these unchanged term loans is included in current maturities of long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
· The Company incurred fees and third party costs of $3.3 million related to the amendment and restatement.
The revolving credit facility provides for total available borrowings up to $60.0 million, reduced by outstanding letters of credit and further restricted by a specific leverage ratio and credit facility leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had the ability to borrow an additional $56.7 million under the terms of the revolving credit agreement. The revolving credit facility bears interest at the LIBOR Rate plus 5.00%, or the U.S. Index Rate plus 3.25%, with a minimum interest rate of 7.50%, and matures on February 9, 2012. Interest is payable on the individual maturity dates for each LIBOR-based borrowing, and monthly on U.S. Index Rate borrowings. Any outstanding principal is due in its entirety on the maturity date.
The term loan facility bears interest at the LIBOR Rate plus 3.50%, or the Index Rate plus 2.50%, with a minimum interest rate of 5.50%, and matures on February 9, 2012. The term loan facility requires quarterly principal payments of $0.3 million, and an additional principal payment of $3.9 million on August 9, 2010, with a final payment of $99.7 million due on the maturity date. Once repaid, principal under the term loan facility may not be re-borrowed by the Company.
The amended and restated senior credit facilities contain financial covenants relating to:
· Maximum capital expenditures.
· Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, defined as earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and certain other items (“EBITDA”) divided by cash payments for interest, taxes, capital expenditures, scheduled debt principal payments, and certain other items.
· Maximum leverage ratio, defined as total debt divided by EBITDA.
· Maximum credit facility leverage ratio, defined as principal outstanding under the senior credit facilities divided by EBITDA.
In addition, there are covenants or restrictions relating to, among other categories, acquisitions, investments, loans and advances, indebtedness, dividends on our stock, and the sale of stock or assets. We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of June 30, 2010. Non-compliance with these covenants, if it were to become an event of default under the terms of the credit agreement, could result in severe limitations to our overall liquidity, and the term loan lenders could require actions for immediate repayment of outstanding amounts, potentially requiring sale of our assets. Such non-compliance, if any, could also result in an event of default under the indenture agreement related to the 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes. Our debt is not subject to any triggers that would require early payment of debt due to any adverse change in our credit rating.
The amended and restated senior credit facilities may be prepaid at any time. There can also be additional mandatory repayment requirements related to the sale of Company assets, the issuance of stock under certain circumstances, or upon the Company’s annual generation of excess cash flow, as determined under the credit agreement.
9
Table of Contents
Blount International, Inc. and all of its domestic subsidiaries other than Blount, Inc. guarantee Blount, Inc.’s obligations under the senior credit facilities. The obligations under the senior credit facilities are collateralized by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of Blount, Inc. and its domestic subsidiaries, as well as a pledge of all of Blount, Inc.’s capital stock held by Blount International, Inc. and all of the stock of domestic subsidiaries held by Blount, Inc. Blount, Inc. has also pledged 65% of the stock of its non-domestic subsidiaries as additional collateral.
August 2010 Amendment and Restatement of Credit Facilities and Repayment of Notes. On August 9, 2010, the Company entered into an amendment and restatement of its senior credit facilities which included the following terms:
· A term B loan facility was established with maximum borrowings of $275.0 million.
· A term A loan facility was established with maximum borrowings of $75.0 million.
· Maximum borrowings under the revolving credit facility were increased to $75.0 million.
· The maturity dates were extended to August 2015 for the revolving credit facility and the term A loan and to August 2016 for the term B loan.
· The LIBOR interest rate on the revolving credit facility and term A facility was changed to LIBOR plus 3.50%.
· The LIBOR interest rate on the term B facility was changed to LIBOR plus 4.00%, with a minimum rate of 5.50%.
· Certain financial and other covenants were amended and revised.
· The Company expects to pay approximately $6.3 million in fees and transaction costs in connection with these transactions.
The Company then drew $350.0 million under these facilities and repaid the principal outstanding under its previous term loan facility. In addition, the Company notified the trustee of its 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes due August 1, 2012 of its intent to redeem the notes at 100% of principal in September 2010, following the expiration of the required redemption notification period, and deposited $175.0 million with the trustee for that purpose.
NOTE 5: PENSION AND OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans covering employees in the U.S., Canada, and Belgium. The Company also sponsors various other post-employment medical and benefit plans covering many of its current and former employees. The U.S. defined benefit pension plan and the associated nonqualified plan have been frozen since December 31, 2006. Employees who currently participate in these U.S. plans no longer accrue benefits and new employees hired since December 31, 2006, are not eligible to participate. All retirement benefits accrued up to the time of the freeze were preserved.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for these plans are as follows:
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | Pension Benefits | | Other Post-Employment Benefits | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Service cost | | $ | 624 | | $ | 548 | | $ | 67 | | $ | 66 | |
Interest cost | | 2,734 | | 2,656 | | 524 | | 505 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | (2,991 | ) | (2,447 | ) | — | | — | |
Amortization of prior service cost | | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | — | | — | |
Amortization of net actuarial losses | | 924 | | 1,261 | | 212 | | 192 | |
Total net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 1,289 | | $ | 2,016 | | $ | 803 | | $ | 763 | |
10
Table of Contents
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | Pension Benefits | | Other Post-Employment Benefits | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Service cost | | $ | 1,248 | | $ | 1,096 | | $ | 134 | | $ | 132 | |
Interest cost | | 5,468 | | 5,312 | | 1,048 | | 1,010 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | (5,982 | ) | (4,894 | ) | — | | — | |
Amortization of prior service cost | | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | — | | — | |
Amortization of net actuarial losses | | 1,848 | | 2,522 | | 424 | | 384 | |
Total net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 2,578 | | $ | 4,032 | | $ | 1,606 | | $ | 1,526 | |
The Company expects to contribute a total of approximately $14 million to $16 million to its funded pension plans during 2010.
The Company receives a Medicare Part D subsidy for a portion of the cost of providing prescription drug benefits under its retiree medical benefit plan. In March of 2010, new legislation was signed into law in the U.S. that makes this subsidy fully subject to federal income tax beginning in 2013. Previously, this subsidy was essentially exempt from federal income tax. Accordingly, the Company recognized a charge of $1.7 million to income tax expense in the three months ended March 31, 2010, reflecting the write-off of the deferred tax asset related to this subsidy.
NOTE 6: FINANCIAL GUARANTEES AND COMMITMENTS
Significant financial guarantees and commitments are summarized in the following table:
| | June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | |
Letters of credit outstanding | | $ | 3,384 | |
Other financial guarantees | | 923 | |
Total financial guarantees and commitments | | $ | 4,307 | |
See also Note 4 above.
NOTE 7: CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Company is a defendant in a number of product liability lawsuits, some of which seek significant or unspecified damages, involving serious personal injuries for which there are retentions or deductible amounts under the Company’s insurance policies. Some of these lawsuits arise out of the Company’s duty to indemnify certain purchasers of the Company’s discontinued operations for lawsuits involving products manufactured prior to the sale of these businesses. In addition, the Company is a party to a number of other lawsuits arising out of the normal course of its business, including suits concerning commercial contracts, employee matters, intellectual property rights and other matters. In some instances the Company is the plaintiff and is seeking recovery of damages. In other instances, the Company is a defendant against whom damages are being sought. While there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of these lawsuits, management does not believe these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, operating results, or cash flows.
In March 2010, the Company received an offer from Region 9 of the Environmental Protection Agency of the U.S. to resolve its potential liability regarding the Operating Industries, Inc. Superfund Site in Monterey Park, California, involving a subsidiary of the former Omark Industries, Inc., which merged with the Company in 1985. The Company submitted its consent to enter into an administrative settlement agreement for the Company’s pro rata share of the site’s clean-up costs as a de minimis participant. Accordingly, the Company recognized a charge of $0.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 in settlement of this matter. However, the settlement agreement is subject to a public comment period of 30 days and other procedures pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. The Company is awaiting notice from the EPA that the de minimis settlement agreement has been accepted by a sufficient number of parties to begin the public comment process.
11
Table of Contents
The Company accrues, by a charge to income, an amount representing management’s best estimate of the undiscounted probable loss related to any matter deemed by management and its counsel as a reasonably probable loss contingency in light of all of the then known circumstances.
NOTE 8: EARNINGS PER SHARE DATA
Shares used in the denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations were as follows:
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
(Shares in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Shares for basic per share computation — weighted average common shares outstanding | | 47,840 | | 47,747 | | 47,815 | | 47,743 | |
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents | | 509 | | 436 | | 524 | | 438 | |
Shares for diluted per share computation | | 48,349 | | 48,183 | | 48,339 | | 48,181 | |
Options and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) excluded from computation as anti-dilutive because they are out-of-the-money | | 2,073 | | 2,207 | | 1,864 | | 2,207 | |
The amount of unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) considered participating securities at June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010 was 188 thousand and 150 thousand, respectively. The allocation of undistributed earnings (net income) to the participating securities under the two class method had no effect on the calculation of earnings per share.
NOTE 9: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company did not grant any stock-based compensation awards during the six months ended June 30, 2009 but did grant the following awards during the six months ended June 30, 2010:
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | |
SARs granted | | 549 | |
RSUs granted | | 118 | |
| | | |
Aggregate fair value of SARs granted | | $ | 3,091 | |
Aggregate fair value of RSUs granted | | $ | 1,322 | |
The SARs and RSUs granted in the six months ended June 30, 2010 vest in one twelfth tranches quarterly over a three-year period and are restricted from exercise, sale, or other transfer until March 31, 2013. The SARs granted have a ten-year term from date of issuance.
The following assumptions and information was used to estimate the fair value of SARs in the six months ended June 30, 2010:
| | 2010 | |
Estimated average life | | 6 years | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 2.8 | % |
Expected volatility | | 49.8 | % |
Weighted average volatility | | 49.8 | % |
Dividend yield | | 0.0 | % |
Exercise price | | $ | 11.85 | |
Weighted average grant date fair value | | $ | 5.96 | |
12
Table of Contents
As of June 30, 2010, the total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to previously granted awards was $7.2 million. The weighted average period over which this expense is expected to be recognized is 2.5 years. The Company’s policy upon the exercise of options, restricted stock awards, RSUs, or SARs has been to issue new shares into the public market from the stockholder-approved 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
NOTE 10: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company identifies operating segments primarily based on organizational structure and the evaluation of the Chief Operating Decision Maker (Chief Executive Officer). The Company has one reportable segment: Outdoor Products. The other category includes centralized administrative functions, a gear component manufacturing business, gain on sale of land and buildings, and plant closure and other severance costs. Outdoor Products manufactures and markets cutting chain, bars, sprockets, and accessories for chainsaws, concrete-cutting equipment, lawnmower blades, and replacement parts and accessories for outdoor equipment. The accounting policies of the segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Certain financial information by segment is presented in the table below:
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Sales: | | | | | | | | | |
Outdoor Products | | $ | 144,788 | | $ | 110,131 | | $ | 277,917 | | $ | 221,550 | |
Other | | 4,168 | | 3,870 | | 7,722 | | 8,975 | |
Total sales | | $ | 148,956 | | $ | 114,001 | | $ | 285,639 | | $ | 230,525 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating income: | | | | | | | | | |
Outdoor Products | | $ | 28,189 | | $ | 14,044 | | $ | 55,967 | | $ | 30,513 | |
Other | | (5,448 | ) | (2,084 | ) | (11,467 | ) | (10,973 | ) |
Total operating income | | $ | 22,741 | | $ | 11,960 | | $ | 44,500 | | $ | 19,540 | |
NOTE 11: SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Interest paid | | $ | 10,369 | | $ | 10,096 | |
Income taxes paid, net | | 3,841 | | 7,289 | |
| | | | | | | |
NOTE 12: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CREDIT RISK CONCENTRATION
The Company has manufacturing or distribution operations in Brazil, Canada, China, Europe, Japan, Russia, and the U.S. The Company sells to customers in these locations and other countries throughout the world. At June 30, 2010, approximately 67% of accounts receivable were from customers outside the U.S. If the U.S. Dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, it becomes more costly for these foreign customers to pay their U.S. Dollar balances owed. They may have difficulty in repaying these amounts, and, in turn, the Company’s bad debt expense may increase. Accounts receivable are principally from distributors, dealers, mass merchants, chainsaw manufacturers, and other original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and are normally not collateralized.
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The carrying amount of accounts receivable approximates fair value because the maturity period is short and the Company has reduced the carrying amount to the estimated net realizable value with an allowance for doubtful accounts. The carrying amount of any principal outstanding on the revolving credit facility approximates fair value because the applicable interest rates are variable and the maturity period is relatively short on each borrowing tranche. The fair value of the term loans is determined by reference to prices of recent transactions whereby buyers and sellers exchange their interests in portions of these loans. The fair value of the fixed rate 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes is determined by reference to quoted market prices. Derivative financial
13
Table of Contents
instruments are carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The carrying amount of other financial instruments approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity periods and variable interest rates associated with the instruments.
The estimated fair values of the term loans and 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are presented below.
| | June 30, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | |
Term loans | | $ | 105,422 | | $ | 105,422 | | $ | 107,465 | | $ | 107,734 | |
8 7/8% senior subordinated notes | | 175,000 | | 175,474 | | 175,000 | | 178,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Financial Instruments and Foreign Currency Hedging. The Company makes regular payments to its wholly-owned subsidiary in Canada, Blount Canada Ltd. (“Blount Canada”), for contract manufacturing services performed by Blount Canada for conversion of raw materials into finished goods. We are exposed to changes in Canadian Dollar to U.S. Dollar exchange rates from these transactions since most conversion costs are incurred in Canadian Dollars. Changes in the Canadian Dollar to U.S. Dollar exchange rates may adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
Since October, 2008, we have managed a portion of Canadian Dollar exchange rate exposures with derivative financial instruments. These derivative financial instruments are zero-cost collar option combinations, consisting of a purchased call option to buy Canadian Dollars and a written put option to sell Canadian Dollars. We apply cash flow hedge accounting to our Canadian Dollar-related derivative financial instruments, and therefore defer the gains or losses on those instruments in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets until maturity, or if it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur, at which time the gain or loss is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
As of June 30, 2010, the cumulative unrealized pre-tax loss on these contracts included in other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was $0.5 million. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, gains of $0.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively, were recognized in cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Income at the maturity of the related Canadian Dollar derivative financial instruments. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, losses of $0.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, were recognized in cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Income at the maturity of the related Canadian Dollar derivative financial instruments. Gains and losses on these Canadian Dollar derivative financial instruments are largely offset in cost of goods sold by the effects of currency exchange rate changes on the underlying transactions. Through June 30, 2010, the Company has not recognized any amount from these contracts in earnings due to ineffectiveness, or due to it becoming probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur. The aggregate notional amount of these Canadian Dollar contracts outstanding was $29.4 million at June 30, 2010 and $30.3 million at December 31, 2009.
We hedge the interest rate and foreign currency exposure on a portion of our cash and cash equivalents invested in Brazil with interest rate swap agreements. The change in fair value of these instruments is recognized in interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Any change in fair value of these derivative contracts is fully offset by the change in fair value of the underlying investments. The Consolidated Statements of Income include income of $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and expense of $1.0 million and $1.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, from the change in fair value of these interest rate swap contracts. There was zero impact in the three months ended June 30, 2010. The aggregate notional amount of these interest rate swap agreements outstanding was zero at June 30, 2010 and $13.0 million at December 31, 2009.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., the framework for measuring fair value is based on independent observable inputs of market data under the following hierarchy:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 — Significant observable inputs based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuations for which all significant assumptions are observable.
Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
14
Table of Contents
The fair values of derivatives held by the Company were:
(Amounts in thousands) | | Carrying Value of Assets (Liabilities) on Balance Sheet | | Assets (Liabilities) Measured at Fair Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
June 30, 2010 | | $ | (476 | ) | $ | (476 | ) | $ | — | | $ | (476 | ) | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2009 | | 2,052 | | 2,052 | | — | | 2,052 | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The fair value of these Level 2 derivatives was determined using a market approach based on daily market prices of similar instruments issued by financial institutions in an active market.
The amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are expected to be recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income within the next twelve months.
NOTE 13: RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In January 2010, the FASB issued new guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures which were effective in two phases. The new guidance requiring enhanced disclosures about an entity’s fair value measurements was effective for us on January 1, 2010 and resulted in expanded footnote disclosures about the fair value of our assets. The new guidance requiring enhanced disclosures in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements will be effective for us on January 1, 2011 and will result in expanded footnote disclosures.
NOTE 14: CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
See Note 4 for a discussion of the Company’s guarantor subsidiaries. The following consolidating financial information sets forth condensed Consolidating Statements of Income, Balance Sheets, and Statements of Cash Flows of Blount International, Inc., Blount, Inc., the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries:
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income Information
(Amounts in thousands) | | Blount International, Inc. | | Blount, Inc. | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | — | | $ | 117,916 | | $ | 4,167 | | $ | 85,693 | | $ | (58,820 | ) | $ | 148,956 | |
Cost of sales | | — | | 82,402 | | 2,776 | | 68,681 | | (57,402 | ) | 96,457 | |
Gross profit | | — | | 35,514 | | 1,391 | | 17,012 | | (1,418 | ) | 52,499 | |
Operating expenses | | — | | 20,407 | | 619 | | 8,732 | | — | | 29,758 | |
Operating income | | — | | 15,107 | | 772 | | 8,280 | | (1,418 | ) | 22,741 | |
Other income (expense), net | | (2,840 | ) | (3,398 | ) | 165 | | (302 | ) | — | | (6,375 | ) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | (2,840 | ) | 11,709 | | 937 | | 7,978 | | (1,418 | ) | 16,366 | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (1,006 | ) | 4,249 | | 367 | | 2,313 | | — | | 5,923 | |
Income (loss) before equity in affiliates | | (1,834 | ) | 7,460 | | 570 | | 5,665 | | (1,418 | ) | 10,443 | |
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies | | 12,277 | | 4,817 | | — | | — | | (17,094 | ) | — | |
Net income | | $ | 10,443 | | $ | 12,277 | | $ | 570 | | $ | 5,665 | | $ | (18,512 | ) | $ | 10,443 | |
15
Table of Contents
(Amounts in thousands) | | Blount International, Inc. | | Blount, Inc. | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | — | | $ | 221,437 | | $ | 7,722 | | $ | 171,049 | | $ | (114,569 | ) | $ | 285,639 | |
Cost of sales | | — | | 153,056 | | 5,509 | | 137,611 | | (113,051 | ) | 183,125 | |
Gross profit | | — | | 68,381 | | 2,213 | | 33,438 | | (1,518 | ) | 102,514 | |
Operating expenses | | — | | 39,730 | | 1,181 | | 17,103 | | — | | 58,014 | |
Operating income | | — | | 28,651 | | 1,032 | | 16,335 | | (1,518 | ) | 44,500 | |
Other income (expense), net | | (5,648 | ) | (6,736 | ) | 331 | | (829 | ) | — | | (12,882 | ) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | (5,648 | ) | 21,915 | | 1,363 | | 15,506 | | (1,518 | ) | 31,618 | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (2,396 | ) | 9,299 | | 578 | | 4,911 | | — | | 12,392 | |
Income (loss) before equity in affiliates | | (3,252 | ) | 12,616 | | 785 | | 10,595 | | (1,518 | ) | 19,226 | |
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies | | 22,478 | | 9,862 | | — | | — | | (32,340 | ) | — | |
Net income | | $ | 19,226 | | $ | 22,478 | | $ | 785 | | $ | 10,595 | | $ | (33,858 | ) | $ | 19,226 | |
16
Table of Contents
(Amounts in thousands) | | Blount International, Inc. | | Blount, Inc. | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | — | | $ | 81,829 | | $ | 5,091 | | $ | 60,348 | | $ | (33,267 | ) | $ | 114,001 | |
Cost of sales | | — | | 60,448 | | 4,704 | | 48,399 | | (34,189 | ) | 79,362 | |
Gross profit | | — | | 21,381 | | 387 | | 11,949 | | 922 | | 34,639 | |
Operating expenses, net | | — | | 16,661 | | 1,060 | | 4,958 | | — | | 22,679 | |
Operating income (loss) | | — | | 4,720 | | (673 | ) | 6,991 | | 922 | | 11,960 | |
Other income (expense), net | | (2,899 | ) | (3,229 | ) | 97 | | (290 | ) | — | | (6,321 | ) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | (2,899 | ) | 1,491 | | (576 | ) | 6,701 | | 922 | | 5,639 | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (892 | ) | 1,628 | | 81 | | 590 | | — | | 1,407 | |
Income (loss) before equity in affiliates | | (2,007 | ) | (137 | ) | (657 | ) | 6,111 | | 922 | | 4,232 | |
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies | | 6,239 | | 6,376 | | — | | — | | (12,615 | ) | — | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 4,232 | | $ | 6,239 | | $ | (657 | ) | $ | 6,111 | | $ | (11,693 | ) | $ | 4,232 | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | Blount International, Inc. | | Blount, Inc. | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | — | | $ | 165,983 | | $ | 13,874 | | $ | 127,490 | | $ | (76,822 | ) | $ | 230,525 | |
Cost of sales | | — | | 118,877 | | 12,246 | | 104,278 | | (77,305 | ) | 158,096 | |
Gross profit | | — | | 47,106 | | 1,628 | | 23,212 | | 483 | | 72,429 | |
Operating expenses, net | | — | | 34,892 | | 5,322 | | 12,675 | | — | | 52,889 | |
Operating income (loss) | | — | | 12,214 | | (3,694 | ) | 10,537 | | 483 | | 19,540 | |
Other income (expense), net | | (5,766 | ) | (6,233 | ) | 242 | | (406 | ) | — | | (12,163 | ) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | (5,766 | ) | 5,981 | | (3,452 | ) | 10,131 | | 483 | | 7,377 | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (2,350 | ) | 3,911 | | (1,381 | ) | 2,008 | | — | | 2,188 | |
Income (loss) before equity in affiliates | | (3,416 | ) | 2,070 | | (2,071 | ) | 8,123 | | 483 | | 5,189 | |
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies | | 8,605 | | 6,535 | | — | | — | | (15,140 | ) | — | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 5,189 | | $ | 8,605 | | $ | (2,071 | ) | $ | 8,123 | | $ | (14,657 | ) | $ | 5,189 | |
17
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
(Amounts in thousands) | | Blount International, Inc. | | Blount, Inc. | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
June 30, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | — | | $ | 9,605 | | $ | — | | $ | 63,387 | | $ | (180 | ) | $ | 72,812 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | — | | 44,257 | | 2,161 | | 31,319 | | — | | 77,737 | |
Intercompany receivables | | — | | 200,177 | | 91,267 | | 39,154 | | (330,598 | ) | — | |
Inventories, net | | — | | 55,989 | | 2,282 | | 32,200 | | (6,969 | ) | 83,502 | |
Other current assets | | — | | 17,268 | | 66 | | 7,321 | | — | | 24,655 | |
Total current assets | | — | | 327,296 | | 95,776 | | 173,381 | | (337,747 | ) | 258,706 | |
Investments in affiliated companies | | 280,821 | | 291,342 | | — | | — | | (572,163 | ) | — | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | — | | 57,278 | | 6,123 | | 48,187 | | — | | 111,588 | |
Goodwill and other assets | | — | | 99,622 | | 12,784 | | 17,058 | | — | | 129,464 | |
Total Assets | | $ | 280,821 | | $ | 775,538 | | $ | 114,683 | | $ | 238,626 | | $ | (909,910 | ) | $ | 499,758 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | $ | — | | $ | 4,924 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 4,924 | |
Accounts payable | | — | | 21,475 | | 1,817 | | 8,240 | | (180 | ) | 31,352 | |
Intercompany payables | | 269,757 | | 39,582 | | 1,725 | | 19,534 | | (330,598 | ) | — | |
Other current liabilities | | — | | 40,580 | | 1,453 | | 15,047 | | — | | 57,080 | |
Total current liabilities | | 269,757 | | 106,561 | | 4,995 | | 42,821 | | (330,778 | ) | 93,356 | |
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities | | — | | 275,498 | | — | | — | | — | | 275,498 | |
Other liabilities | | 779 | | 112,658 | | 241 | | 6,941 | | — | | 120,619 | |
Total liabilities | | 270,536 | | 494,717 | | 5,236 | | 49,762 | | (330,778 | ) | 489,473 | |
Stockholders’ equity | | 10,285 | | 280,821 | | 109,447 | | 188,864 | | (579,132 | ) | 10,285 | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 280,821 | | $ | 775,538 | | $ | 114,683 | | $ | 238,626 | | $ | (909,910 | ) | $ | 499,758 | |
18
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
(Amounts in thousands) | | Blount International, Inc. | | Blount, Inc. | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 55,314 | | $ | (244 | ) | $ | 55,070 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | — | | 46,172 | | 1,212 | | 27,091 | | — | | 74,475 | |
Intercompany receivables | | — | | 203,935 | | 87,710 | | 45,712 | | (337,357 | ) | — | |
Inventories, net | | — | | 53,475 | | 2,539 | | 22,409 | | (244 | ) | 78,179 | |
Deferred income taxes | | — | | 4,274 | | — | | 1,254 | | — | | 5,528 | |
Other current assets | | — | | 15,787 | | 5,754 | | 8,077 | | (5,656 | ) | 23,962 | |
Total current assets | | — | | 323,643 | | 97,215 | | 159,857 | | (343,501 | ) | 237,214 | |
Investments in affiliated companies | | 262,141 | | 291,517 | | — | | — | | (553,658 | ) | — | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | — | | 56,807 | | 6,633 | | 51,030 | | — | | 114,470 | |
Goodwill and other assets | | — | | 103,501 | | 12,784 | | 15,597 | | — | | 131,882 | |
Total Assets | | $ | 262,141 | | $ | 775,468 | | $ | 116,632 | | $ | 226,484 | | $ | (897,159 | ) | $ | 483,566 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | $ | — | | $ | 5,013 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 5,013 | |
Accounts payable | | — | | 28,797 | | 629 | | 8,013 | | (5,900 | ) | 31,539 | |
Intercompany payables | | 267,989 | | 49,940 | | (544 | ) | 19,972 | | (337,357 | ) | — | |
Other current liabilities | | — | | 35,129 | | 2,001 | | 13,985 | | — | | 51,115 | |
Total current liabilities | | 267,989 | | 118,879 | | 2,086 | | 41,970 | | (343,257 | ) | 87,667 | |
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities | | — | | 280,852 | | — | | — | | — | | 280,852 | |
Other liabilities | | 892 | | 113,596 | | 324 | | 6,975 | | — | | 121,787 | |
Total liabilities | | 268,881 | | 513,327 | | 2,410 | | 48,945 | | (343,257 | ) | 490,306 | |
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | (6,740 | ) | 262,141 | | 114,222 | | 177,539 | | (553,902 | ) | (6,740 | ) |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | | $ | 262,141 | | $ | 775,468 | | $ | 116,632 | | $ | 226,484 | | $ | (897,159 | ) | $ | 483,566 | |
19
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Cash Flows Information
(Amounts in thousands) | | Blount International, Inc. | | Blount, Inc. | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | — | | $ | 25,281 | | $ | 1,485 | | $ | 4,561 | | $ | 64 | | $ | 31,391 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment, net of proceeds from sales | | — | | (6,110 | ) | (35 | ) | (2,474 | ) | — | | (8,619 | ) |
Advances from affiliates, net | | — | | — | | — | | 5,690 | | (5,690 | ) | — | |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | — | | (6,110 | ) | (35 | ) | 3,216 | | (5,690 | ) | (8,619 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net repayments under revolving credit facility | | — | | (3,400 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (3,400 | ) |
Repayment of term loan principal | | — | | (2,043 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (2,043 | ) |
Advances to affiliates, net | | (74 | ) | (4,123 | ) | (1,450 | ) | (43 | ) | 5,690 | | — | |
Other | | 74 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 74 | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | — | | (9,566 | ) | (1,450 | ) | (43 | ) | 5,690 | | (5,369 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes | | — | | — | | — | | 339 | | — | | 339 | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | — | | 9,605 | | — | | 8,073 | | 64 | | 17,742 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | — | | — | | — | | 55,314 | | (244 | ) | 55,070 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | — | | $ | 9,605 | | $ | — | | $ | 63,387 | | $ | (180 | ) | $ | 72,812 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | — | | $ | 2,708 | | $ | 3,799 | | $ | 11,347 | | $ | 219 | | $ | 18,073 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of property, plant, and equipment | | — | | (3,857 | ) | (391 | ) | (4,263 | ) | — | | (8,511 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of assets | | — | | — | | 42 | | 3,214 | | — | | 3,256 | |
Advances to affiliates, net | | — | | — | | — | | (17,472 | ) | 17,472 | | — | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | — | | (3,857 | ) | (349 | ) | (18,521 | ) | 17,472 | | (5,255 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net borrowings under revolving credit facility | | — | | (7,000 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (7,000 | ) |
Repayment of term loan principal | | — | | (11,746 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (11,746 | ) |
Issuance costs related to debt | | — | | (1,900 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (1,900 | ) |
Advances from (to) affiliates, net | | 348 | | 21,610 | | (3,450 | ) | (1,036 | ) | (17,472 | ) | — | |
Other | | (348 | ) | — | | — | | — | | — | | (348 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | — | | 964 | | (3,450 | ) | (1,036 | ) | (17,472 | ) | (20,994 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes | | — | | — | | — | | (1,347 | ) | — | | (1,347 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | — | | (185 | ) | — | | (9,557 | ) | 219 | | (9,523 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | $ | — | | $ | 185 | | $ | — | | $ | 59,158 | | $ | (1,068 | ) | $ | 58,275 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 49,601 | | $ | (849 | ) | $ | 48,752 | |
20
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.
Operating Results
Three months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) compared to three months ended June 30, 2009 (unaudited).
The table below provides a summary of results and the primary contributing factors to the year-over-year change.
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | | | |
(Amounts in millions) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | Change | | | | Contributing Factor | |
(Amounts may not sum due to rounding) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 149.0 | | $ | 114.0 | | $ | 35.0 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ | 35.6 | | Sales volume | |
| | | | | | | | (1.3 | ) | Selling price and mix | |
| | | | | | | | 0.6 | | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | 52.5 | | 34.6 | | 17.9 | | | | | |
Gross margin | | 35.2 | % | 30.4 | % | | | 11.8 | | Sales volume | |
| | | | | | | | (1.3 | ) | Selling price and mix | |
| | | | | | | | 8.7 | | Product cost and mix | |
| | | | | | | | (1.4 | ) | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”) | | 29.8 | | 24.0 | | 5.7 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 3.4 | | Compensation and benefits expense | |
| | | | | | | | 0.6 | | Advertising | |
| | | | | | | | 1.1 | | Strategic initiatives | |
| | | | | | | | 0.4 | | Foreign warehouse closure | |
| | | | | | | | 0.3 | | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Plant closure and severance costs | | — | | 1.4 | | (1.4 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain on sale of land and building | | — | | 2.7 | | (2.7 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | 22.7 | | 12.0 | | 10.8 | | | | | |
Operating margin | | 15.3 | % | 10.5 | % | | | 17.9 | | Increase in gross profit | |
| | | | | | | | (5.7 | ) | Increase in SG&A | |
| | | | | | | | 1.4 | | Plant closure and severance costs | |
| | | | | | | | (2.7 | ) | Gain on sale of land and building | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 10.4 | | $ | 4.2 | | $ | 6.2 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 10.8 | | Increase in operating income | |
| | | | | | | | (4.5 | ) | Increase in income tax provision | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales in the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $35.0 million (30.7%) from the same period in 2009, primarily due to increased unit volume of $35.6 million. Changes in average selling price and mix lowered sales revenue by $1.3 million on a quarter-over-quarter comparative basis. Lower average selling prices were attributable to a higher proportion of OEM sales versus replacement market sales in the comparable prior year quarter. International sales increased by $29.3 million (40.2%), while domestic sales increased by $5.6 million (13.7%). The increase in international sales reflected improved world-wide market conditions and increased demand for our products following the severe global recession experienced in 2009. During the second quarter of 2009, we were cautious about extending credit to certain higher risk geographical areas during the global recession, which we believe contributed to a slowdown in sales and orders last year from portions of our international customer base. As international market conditions and credit concerns have improved, our international sales have increased.
21
Table of Contents
Consolidated order backlog at June 30, 2010 was $124.5 million compared to $105.7 million at March 31, 2010. Backlog in the Outdoor Products segment increased $17.9 million, while the backlog for gear components increased by $0.9 million during the second quarter of 2010.
Gross profit increased $17.9 million (51.6%) from the second quarter of 2009 to the second quarter of 2010. Higher unit sales volume and improved product cost and mix drove the increase in gross profit. These positive factors were partially offset by negative movements in average selling prices and mix and in foreign currency exchange rates. Our manufacturing costs were favorably affected during the second quarter of 2010 by higher production volumes, including the elimination of idle manufacturing days. The higher production volumes drove improved absorption rates when compared to the second quarter of 2009. Year-over-year steel costs are estimated to be $1.6 million lower for the comparable second quarter periods, although we expect steel costs to increase later in 2010. Gross margin in the second quarter of 2010 was 35.2% of sales compared to 30.4% in the second quarter of 2009.
Fluctuations in currency exchange rates decreased our gross profit in the second quarter of 2010 compared to 2009 by $1.4 million on a consolidated basis. The translation of stronger foreign currencies into a weaker U.S. Dollar resulted in higher reported sales revenue from our sales outside the U.S. (primarily in Canada). However, higher reported manufacturing costs in Brazil and Canada, as a result of stronger currencies in those countries, more than offset the favorable impact that translation of stronger foreign currencies had on sales.
SG&A was $29.8 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared to $24.0 million in the second quarter of 2009, representing an increase of $5.7 million (23.9%). As a percentage of sales, SG&A decreased from 21.1% in the second quarter of 2009 to 20.0% in the second quarter of 2010, primarily due to the increase in sales revenue, which outpaced the increase in SG&A spending. Compensation and benefits expense for the quarter increased by $3.4 million on a year-over-year basis, reflecting annual merit increases, increased incentive compensation attributable to improved operating results, higher stock-based compensation expense, and increased employee benefit costs. Advertising expense increased by $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009, as we had reduced our advertising programs during the 2009 economic downturn. We incurred $1.1 million in consulting and other costs related to several strategic initiatives we began in the second quarter including projects to improve the efficiency of our manufacturing processes and supply chain. The closure of our warehouse and distribution center in France, and consolidation of these functions into our European distribution center in Belgium in the second quarter of 2010, resulted in costs of $0.4 million. Operating expenses increased $0.3 million from the prior year due to the weaker U.S. Dollar and its effect on the translation of foreign expenses.
On June 25, 2009, we sold the land and building representing our former European headquarters and distribution center. These operations were moved to new, nearby leased facilities. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $2.7 million on the sale. We took actions during 2009 to consolidate manufacturing operations and reduce the number of employees at certain of our locations. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a total of $1.4 million in plant closure and severance charges related to these actions.
Operating income increased by $10.8 million from the second quarter of 2009 to the second quarter of 2010. The operating margin for the second quarter of 2010 was 15.3% of sales compared to 10.5% for the second quarter of 2009. The improvement was due to higher sales volume and gross profit, partially offset by increased SG&A expenses. The change in the second quarter of 2010 compared to 2009 was also impacted by the restructuring charges and the gain on the sale of land and building in 2009 that were not repeated in 2010.
Interest expense was $6.4 million in both the second quarter of 2010 and the second quarter of 2009.
The following table summarizes our income tax provision in 2010 and 2009:
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Income before income taxes | | $ | 16,366 | | $ | 5,639 | |
Provision for income taxes | | 5,923 | | 1,407 | |
Effective tax rate | | 36.2 | % | 25.0 | % |
| | | | | | | |
The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2010 was higher than the federal statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes and taxes recognized on interest and dividends from certain of our foreign locations. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2009 was reduced from the federal statutory rate by the impact of lower taxes on our
22
Table of Contents
foreign operations. Taxes on our foreign operations were lower due to increased deductions for tax purposes, which are not recognized as expenses for book purposes. Additionally, our effective tax rate in 2009 was reduced by federal and state tax credits. The effective tax rate in both periods was increased by additional tax expense recognized on interest and dividends from certain of our foreign locations.
Net income in the second quarter of 2010 was $10.4 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, compared to $4.2 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2009.
Segment Results. The following table reflects segment sales and operating results for 2010 and 2009:
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | Percent Change | |
Sales: | | | | | | | |
Outdoor Products | | $ | 144,788 | | $ | 110,131 | | 31.5 | % |
Other | | 4,168 | | 3,870 | | 7.7 | |
Total sales | | $ | 148,956 | | $ | 114,001 | | 30.7 | % |
Operating income: | | | | | | | |
Outdoor Products | | $ | 28,189 | | $ | 14,044 | | 100.7 | % |
Other | | (5,448 | ) | (2,084 | ) | 161.5 | |
Operating income | | $ | 22,741 | | $ | 11,960 | | 90.1 | % |
Outdoor Products Segment. Sales for the Outdoor Products segment increased by $34.7 million (31.5%) in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to an increase in unit volume of $35.2 million, reflecting improved international market conditions and strong customer demand for our products. Segment sales were reduced by $1.1 million from the effect of lower average selling prices, driven by product mix and a higher relative proportion of sales to OEM customers as opposed to sales in the replacement market in the comparative quarterly periods. Sales of wood-cutting chainsaw components were up 35.9%, sales of concrete-cutting products were up 33.8%, and sales of outdoor care products were up 14.5%. Sales to OEM customers increased by 39.3%, while replacement market sales increased by 29.1%. International sales increased 40.6% for the three month comparable period, while domestic sales increased by 13.8%.
Segment contribution to operating income increased $14.1 million (100.7%) in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009. Increased sales unit volume ($11.6 million) and lower product cost and mix ($8.5 million) drove the improvement in contribution to operating income. These positive factors were partially offset by the effects of lower average selling prices and mix ($1.1 million), fluctuations in foreign currency translation rates ($1.8 million), and higher SG&A expenses ($3.0 million). Our product costs were positively affected in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009 by higher production volumes, including the elimination of idle manufacturing days. The higher production volumes drove improved absorption rates when compared to the second quarter of 2009. Capacity utilization in our Outdoor Products segment is estimated at 92% for the second quarter of 2010, compared to 60% for the second quarter of 2009. In addition, steel costs on a year-over-year comparative basis were lower by an estimated $1.8 million, although we expect steel costs to increase in the second half of 2010. SG&A expenses were higher primarily due to increased compensation costs ($1.4 million), advertising expenses ($0.6 million), and severance costs for the closure of our warehouse and distribution function in France ($0.4 million).
Other. The other category includes centralized administrative functions, the results of our gear components manufacturing business, certain post-retirement benefit plan costs, plant closure and severance costs, and other restructuring costs. Sales of gear-related products increased by 7.7% from the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2010, primarily due to increased unit volume. The contribution to operating income from our gear components business increased by $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2010, as a result of increased volume. Central administrative expenses were up $3.7 million for the comparable period, primarily due to increased compensation and benefits expenses attributable to annual merit increases, increased incentive compensation from improved operating results, higher stock-based compensation costs, increased employee benefit costs, and costs incurred in conjunction with several strategic initiatives to improve manufacturing and supply chain efficiency. Additionally, the gain on the sale of land and building and costs for plant closure and severance recognized in the second quarter of 2009 were not repeated in 2010.
23
Table of Contents
Six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) compared to six months ended June 30, 2009 (unaudited).
The table below provides a summary of results and the primary contributing factors to the year-over-year change.
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | | | |
(Amounts in millions) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | Change | | | | Contributing Factor | |
(Amounts may not sum due to rounding) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 285.6 | | $ | 230.5 | | $ | 55.1 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ | 58.8 | | Sales volume | |
| | | | | | | | (5.9 | ) | Selling price and mix | |
| | | | | | | | 2.2 | | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | 102.5 | | 72.4 | | 30.1 | | | | | |
Gross margin | | 35.9 | % | 31.4 | % | | | 23.2 | | Sales volume | |
| | | | | | | | 15.0 | | Product cost and mix | |
| | | | | | | | (5.9 | ) | Selling price and mix | |
| | | | | | | | (2.2 | ) | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
SG&A | | 58.0 | | 49.2 | | 8.8 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 4.8 | | Compensation and benefits expense | |
| | | | | | | | 1.0 | | Advertising | |
| | | | | | | | 1.1 | | Strategic initiatives | |
| | | | | | | | 0.4 | | Foreign warehouse closure | |
| | | | | | | | 1.1 | | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | 0.4 | | Other | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Plant closure and severance costs | | — | | 6.4 | | (6.4 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain on sale of land and building | | — | | 2.7 | | (2.7 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | 44.5 | | 19.5 | | 25.0 | | | | | |
Operating margin | | 15.6 | % | 8.5 | % | | | 30.1 | | Increase in gross profit | |
| | | | | | | | (8.8 | ) | Increase in SG&A | |
| | | | | | | | 6.4 | | Plant closure and severance costs | |
| | | | | | | | (2.7 | ) | Gain on sale of land and building | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 19.2 | | $ | 5.2 | | $ | 14.0 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 25.0 | | Increase in operating income | |
| | | | | | | | (0.1 | ) | Other | |
| | | | | | | | (0.7 | ) | Increase in net interest expense | |
| | | | | | | | (10.2 | ) | Increase in income tax provision | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales in the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $55.1 million (23.9%) from the same period in 2009, primarily due to increased unit volume of $58.8 million. Changes in average selling price and mix lowered sales revenue by $5.9 million on a year-over-year comparative basis. Lower average selling prices were attributable to increased sales to large volume customers, as well as a higher proportion of OEM sales in the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009. The translation of foreign currency-denominated sales transactions, given the weaker U.S. Dollar in comparison to the first half of 2009, increased consolidated sales by $2.2 million year-to-date in 2010. International sales increased by $53.9 million (36.6%), while domestic sales increased by $1.2 million (1.5%). The increase in international sales reflected improved world-wide market conditions and demand for our products following the severe global recession experienced in 2009, as well as favorable effects from movement in foreign currency exchange rates compared to 2009. During the first half of 2009, we were cautious about extending credit to certain higher risk geographical areas during the global recession, which we believe contributed to a slowdown in sales and orders from portions of our international customer base. As international market conditions and credit concerns have improved, our international sales have increased. The relatively small increase in domestic sales is attributable to the timing of our seasonal programs in the U.S., which are designed to assist distributors in stocking for the spring end-user selling cycle. These seasonal programs were launched in the fourth quarter of 2009 rather than in the first quarter of 2010, which resulted in reduced customer buying patterns in the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009.
24
Table of Contents
Consolidated order backlog at June 30, 2010 was $124.5 million compared to $79.7 million at December 31, 2009. Backlog in the Outdoor Products segment increased $43.1 million, while the backlog for gear components increased by $1.7 million during the first half of 2010.
Gross profit increased $30.1 million (41.5%) from the first half of 2009 to the first half of 2010. Higher unit sales volume and improved product cost and mix drove the increase in gross profit. These positive factors were partially offset by negative movements in average selling prices and mix and in foreign currency exchange rates. Our manufacturing costs were favorably affected during the first half of 2010 by higher production volumes, including the elimination of idle manufacturing days. The higher production volumes drove improved absorption rates when compared to the first half of 2009. Year-over-year steel costs are estimated to be $5.8 million lower from the first half of 2009 to the first half of 2010, although we expect steel costs to increase later in 2010. Gross margin in the first half of 2010 was 35.9% of sales compared to 31.4% in the first half of 2009.
Fluctuations in currency exchange rates decreased our gross profit in the first half of 2010 compared to 2009 by $2.2 million on a consolidated basis. The translation of stronger foreign currencies into a weaker U.S. Dollar resulted in higher reported sales revenue from our sales outside the U.S. (primarily in Europe and Canada). However, higher reported manufacturing costs in Brazil and Canada, as a result of stronger currencies in those countries, more than offset the favorable impact that translation of stronger foreign currencies had on sales.
SG&A was $58.0 million in the first half of 2010, compared to $49.2 million in the first half of 2009, representing an increase of $8.8 million (17.9%). As a percentage of sales, SG&A decreased from 21.3% in the first half of 2009 to 20.3% in the first half of 2010, primarily due to the increase in sales revenue, which outpaced the increase in SG&A spending. Compensation and benefits expense for the first half of 2010 increased by $4.8 million on a year-over-year basis, reflecting annual merit increases, increased incentive compensation attributable to improved operating results, higher stock-based compensation expense, and increased employee benefit costs. Advertising expense increased by $1.0 million in the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009 as we limited our advertising programs during 2009. We incurred $1.1 million in consulting and other costs related to several strategic initiatives we began in the second quarter including projects to improve the efficiency of our manufacturing processes and supply chain. The closure of our warehouse and distribution center in France, and consolidation of these functions in our European distribution center in Belgium during the second quarter of 2010, resulted in costs of $0.4 million in the first half of 2010. Operating expenses increased $1.1 million from the prior year due to the weaker U.S. Dollar and its effect on the translation of foreign expenses.
On June 25, 2009, we sold the land and building representing our former European headquarters and distribution center. These operations were moved to new, nearby leased facilities. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $2.7 million on the sale. We took actions during 2009 to consolidate manufacturing operations and reduce the number of employees at certain of our locations. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a total of $6.4 million in plant closure and severance charges related to these actions.
Operating income increased by $25.0 million from the first half of 2009 to the first half of 2010, resulting in an operating margin for the first half of 2010 of 15.6% of sales compared to 8.5% for the first half of 2009. The increase was due to higher sales volume and gross profit, partially offset by increased SG&A expenses and unfavorable foreign exchange effects. In addition, the restructuring charges and the gain on sale of land and building recognized in 2009 were not repeated in 2010.
Interest expense was $12.9 million in the first half of 2010 compared to $12.4 million in the first half of 2009. The increase was due to higher average interest rates on our variable rate debt, partially offset by lower average outstanding debt balances in the comparable periods. The variable interest rates on our term loans increased significantly when we amended and restated our senior credit facilities in December 2009, although the impact of increased rates was partially offset by lower average borrowings.
25
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes our income tax provision in 2010 and 2009:
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Income before income taxes | | $ | 31,618 | | $ | 7,377 | |
Provision for income taxes | | 12,392 | | 2,188 | |
Effective tax rate | | 39.1 | % | 29.7 | % |
| | | | | | | |
The effective tax rate for the first half of 2010 was higher than the federal statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes and the $1.7 million impact of the change in tax deductibility related to the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit we provide to certain of our U.S. retirees. These increases to the effective tax rate were partially offset by the positive effects from settlement of our IRS audit and the related release of reserves for some of our previously recorded uncertain tax positions. The effective tax rate for the first half of 2009 was reduced from the federal statutory rate by the impact of lower taxes on our foreign operations. Taxes on our foreign operations were lower due to increased deductions for tax purposes which are not recognized as expense for book purposes. Additionally, our effective tax rate in 2009 was reduced by federal and state tax credits. The effective tax rate is increased in both periods by additional tax expenses recognized on interest and dividends from certain of our foreign locations.
The Company sponsors various post-employment retiree medical benefit plans for certain employees in the U.S. The Company expects health care reform regulations to eventually have an impact on the liability and expense of this plan, but at this time not enough information is available to make a reasonable estimate of the impact. The Company receives a Medicare Part D subsidy for a portion of the cost of providing prescription drug benefits under its retiree medical benefit plan. In March of 2010, new legislation was signed into law in the U.S. that makes this subsidy fully subject to federal income tax beginning in 2013. Previously, this subsidy was essentially exempt from federal income tax. Accordingly, the Company recognized a charge of $1.7 million to income tax expense in the six months ended June 30, 2010, reflecting the write-off of the deferred tax asset related to this subsidy.
Net income in the first half of 2010 was $19.2 million, or $0.40 per diluted share, compared to $5.2 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, in the first half of 2009.
Segment Results. The following table reflects segment sales and operating results for 2010 and 2009:
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | Percent Change | |
Sales: | | | | | | | |
Outdoor Products | | $ | 277,917 | | $ | 221,550 | | 25.4 | % |
Other | | 7,722 | | 8,975 | | (14.0 | ) |
Total sales | | 285,639 | | 230,525 | | 23.9 | % |
Operating income: | | | | | | | |
Outdoor Products | | 55,967 | | 30,513 | | 83.4 | % |
Other | | (11,467 | ) | (10,973 | ) | 4.5 | |
Total operating income | | $ | 44,500 | | $ | 19,540 | | 127.7 | % |
Outdoor Products Segment. Sales for the Outdoor Products segment increased by $56.4 million (25.4%) in the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009, primarily due to an increase in unit volume of $59.7 million, reflecting improved international market conditions and strong customer demand for our products. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates further increased reported segment sales revenue by $2.2 million compared to the first half of 2009. Segment sales were reduced by $5.5 million from the effect of lower average selling prices driven by product mix and a higher relative proportion of sales to OEM and large volume customers. Sales of wood-cutting chainsaw components were up 29.6%, sales of concrete-cutting products were up 23.2%, and sales of outdoor care products were up 8.6% year-over-year. Sales of our outdoor care products were positively affected in the first half of 2009 by weather conditions in the Midwest and East Coast areas of the U.S., which stimulated demand for such products, and by the positive market reception of promotional activities that we implemented at that time. Sales to OEM customers increased by 31.5%, while replacement market sales increased by 23.6%. International sales increased 36.9% for the six month comparable period, while domestic sales increased by 2.9%.
26
Table of Contents
Segment contribution to operating income increased $25.5 million (83.4%) in the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009. Increased sales unit volume ($23.5 million) and lower product cost and mix ($14.4 million) were the primary factors driving the improvement. These positive factors were partially offset by the effects of lower average selling prices and mix ($5.5 million), fluctuations in foreign currency translation rates ($3.3 million), and higher SG&A expenses ($3.5 million). Our product costs were positively affected during the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009 by higher production volumes, including the elimination of idle manufacturing days. The higher production volumes drove improved absorption rates when compared to the first half of 2009. Capacity utilization in our Outdoor Products segment is estimated at 90% for the first six months of 2010 compared to 65% for the first six months of 2009. In addition, steel costs on a year-over-year comparative basis were lower by an estimated $6.0 million, although we expect steel costs to increase in the second half of 2010. SG&A expenses were higher primarily due to increased compensation costs ($1.5 million), advertising expenses ($1.0 million), and severance costs for the closure of our warehouse and distribution function in France and other actions ($0.5 million).
Other. The other category includes centralized administrative functions, the results of our gear components manufacturing business, certain post-retirement benefit plan costs, gain on sale of land and building, plant closure and severance costs, and other restructuring costs. Sales of gear-related products decreased by 14.0% from the first half of 2009 to the first half of 2010 primarily due to reduced unit volume. The sales decrease included lower volume of $0.9 million and a $0.4 million unfavorable effect of mix changes. The contribution to operating income from our gear components business was slightly higher by $0.3 million on a year-over-year basis. Central administrative expenses were up $0.8 million for the comparable periods, due to higher costs for compensation and benefits due to annual merit increases, increased incentive compensation from improved operating results, higher stock-based compensation costs, increased employee benefit costs, and costs incurred in conjunction with several strategic initiatives to improve manufacturing and supply chain efficiency. In addition, the plant closure and severance costs of $6.4 million, and a pre-tax gain of $2.7 million on the sale of property in Belgium, both recognized in the first half of 2009, were not repeated in 2010.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Total debt at June 30, 2010 was $280.4 million compared to $285.9 million at December 31, 2009:
| | June 30, | | December 31, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Revolving credit facility | | $ | — | | $ | 3,400 | |
Term loans | | 105,422 | | 107,465 | |
8 7/8% senior subordinated notes | | 175,000 | | 175,000 | |
Total debt | | 280,422 | | 285,865 | |
Less current maturities | | (4,924 | ) | (5,013 | ) |
Long-term debt | | $ | 275,498 | | $ | 280,852 | |
8 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes. The Company has one registered debt security, the 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes. The interest rate on these notes is fixed until their maturity on August 1, 2012. These notes are subject to redemption at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at redemption prices of 102.219% through July 31, 2010; and at 100% on August 1, 2010 and thereafter (see further discussion following). These notes are issued by the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Blount, Inc., and are fully and unconditionally, jointly and severally, guaranteed by the Company and all of its domestic subsidiaries (“guarantor subsidiaries”) other than Blount, Inc. All guarantor subsidiaries of these 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes are 100% owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company. While the Company and all of its domestic subsidiaries guarantee these 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes, none of Blount’s existing foreign subsidiaries (“non-guarantor subsidiaries”) guarantee these notes. See also Note 14.
Senior Credit Facilities. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Blount, Inc., first entered into a credit agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation as Agent on May 15, 2003. The agreement was amended and restated on August 9, 2004, underwent several subsequent amendments, and was amended and restated again on December 4, 2009. The senior credit facilities consist of a revolving credit facility and a term loan facility.
27
Table of Contents
April 2009 Amendment to Revolving Credit Facility. On April 30, 2009, we entered into an amendment to the revolving credit facility as follows:
· The maturity date was extended to August 9, 2010.
· We reduced total availability under the revolving credit facility from $150.0 million to $90.0 million.
· The interest rate was increased from the LIBOR rate plus 1.75% or the U.S. prime interest rate, with no minimum, to the LIBOR rate as defined in the credit agreement (the “LIBOR Rate”) plus 5.00% or the U.S. index rate as defined in the credit agreement (the “U.S. Index Rate”) plus 3.25%, with a minimum rate of 7.50%, on all outstanding principal. The Company may elect to borrow amounts under either the LIBOR Rate or the U.S. Index Rate.
· The commitment fee on unused borrowing capacity was increased from 0.375% to 1.00%.
· The Company incurred fees and third party costs of $2.0 million related to the amendment.
December 2009 Amendment and Restatement of Credit Facilities. On December 4, 2009, the senior credit facility was amended and restated as follows:
· The maturity date for both the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility was extended to February 9, 2012.
· We reduced total availability under the revolving credit facility from $90.0 million to $60.0 million.
· The interest rate on the term loan facility was increased from LIBOR plus 1.75% or the U.S. prime rate to the LIBOR Rate plus 3.50%, or the index rate as defined in the credit agreement (the “Index Rate”) plus 2.50%, with a minimum rate of 5.50%. The Company may elect to borrow amounts for specific periods under either the LIBOR Rate or Index Rate.
· The maximum allowed leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, was increased from 4.25 to 4.50.
· Existing term loans representing $3.9 million of the total of $107.5 million term loan principal outstanding at the time were not affected by this amendment and restatement, and the terms for this portion of the term loans remain unchanged, including interest at the prime rate and a maturity date of August 9, 2010. The principal amount of these unchanged term loans is included in current maturities of long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
· The Company incurred fees and third party costs of $3.3 million related to the amendment and restatement.
The revolving credit facility provides for total available borrowings up to $60.0 million, reduced by outstanding letters of credit and further restricted by a specific leverage ratio and credit facility leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had the ability to borrow an additional $56.7 million under the terms of the revolving credit agreement. The revolving credit facility bears interest at the LIBOR Rate plus 5.00%, or the U.S. Index Rate plus 3.25%, with a minimum interest rate of 7.50%, and matures on February 9, 2012. Interest is payable on the individual maturity dates for each LIBOR-based borrowing, and monthly on U.S. Index Rate borrowings. Any outstanding principal is due in its entirety on the maturity date.
The term loan facility bears interest at the LIBOR Rate plus 3.50%, or the Index Rate plus 2.50%, with a minimum interest rate of 5.50%, and matures on February 9, 2012. The term loan facility requires quarterly principal payments of $0.3 million, and an additional principal payment of $3.9 million on August 9, 2010, with a final payment of $99.7 million due on the maturity date. Once repaid, principal under the term loan facility may not be re-borrowed by the Company.
The amended and restated senior credit facilities contain financial covenants relating to:
· Maximum capital expenditures.
· Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, defined as EBITDA divided by cash payments for interest, taxes, capital expenditures, scheduled debt principal payments, and certain other items.
· Maximum leverage ratio, defined as total debt divided by EBITDA.
· Maximum credit facility leverage ratio, defined as principal outstanding under the senior credit facilities divided by EBITDA.
28
Table of Contents
| | As of June 30, 2010 | |
Financial Covenants | | Requirement | | Actual | |
Maximum capital expenditures per year | | $ | 32,500 | | $ | 8,641 | |
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio last 12 months | | 1.15 | | 2.33 | |
Maximum leverage ratio last 12 months | | 4.50 | | 2.58 | |
Maximum credit facility leverage ratio last 12 months | | 2.50 | | 0.99 | |
| | | | | | | |
In addition, there are covenants or restrictions relating to, among other categories, acquisitions, investments, loans and advances, indebtedness, dividends on our stock, and the sale of stock or assets. We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of June 30, 2010. Non-compliance with these covenants, if it were to become an event of default under the terms of the credit agreement, could result in severe limitations to our overall liquidity, and the term loan lenders could require actions for immediate repayment of outstanding amounts, potentially requiring the sale of our assets. Such non-compliance, if any, could also result in an event of default under the indenture agreement related to the 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes. Our debt is not subject to any triggers that would require early payment of debt due to any adverse change in our credit rating.
The amended and restated senior credit facilities may be prepaid at any time. There can also be additional mandatory repayment requirements related to the sale of Company assets, the issuance of stock under certain circumstances, or upon the Company’s annual generation of excess cash flow, as determined under the credit agreement.
Blount International, Inc. and all of its domestic subsidiaries other than Blount, Inc. guarantee Blount, Inc.’s obligations under the senior credit facilities. The obligations under the senior credit facilities are collateralized by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of Blount, Inc. and its domestic subsidiaries, as well as a pledge of all of Blount, Inc.’s capital stock held by Blount International, Inc. and all of the stock of domestic subsidiaries held by Blount, Inc. Blount, Inc. has also pledged 65% of the stock of its non-domestic subsidiaries as additional collateral.
Our debt instruments and general credit are rated by both Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. There were no changes to these ratings during the three or six months ended June 30, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the credit ratings for the Company were as follows:
| | Standard & Poor’s | | Moody’s | |
Senior credit facility | | BB+ | | Ba1 | |
Senior subordinated notes | | B | | B2 | |
General credit rating | | BB- /Stable | | Ba3 | |
August 2010 Amendment and Restatement of Credit Facilities and Repayment of Notes. On August 9, 2010, the Company entered into an amendment and restatement of its senior credit facilities which included the following terms:
· A term B loan facility was established with maximum borrowings of $275.0 million.
· A term A loan facility was established with maximum borrowings of $75.0 million.
· Maximum borrowings under the revolving credit facility were increased to $75.0 million.
· The maturity dates were extended to August 2015 for the revolving credit facility and the term A loan and to August 2016 for the term B loan.
· The LIBOR interest rate on the revolving credit facility and term A facility was changed to LIBOR plus 3.50%.
· The LIBOR interest rate on the term B facility was changed to LIBOR plus 4.00% with a minimum rate of 5.50%.
· Certain financial and other covenants were amended and revised.
· The Company expects to pay approximately $6.3 million in fees and transaction costs in connection with these transactions.
29
Table of Contents
The Company then drew $350.0 million under these facilities and repaid the principal outstanding under its previous term loan facility. In addition, the Company notified the trustee of its 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes due August 1, 2012 of its intent to redeem the notes at 100% of principal in September 2010, following the expiration of the required redemption notification period, and deposited $175.0 million with the trustee for that purpose.
We intend to fund working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, and obligations under our post-employment benefit plans for the next twelve months through cash flows generated from operations and the amounts available under our revolving credit facility. We expect our financial resources will be sufficient to cover any additional increases in working capital and capital expenditures. There can be no assurance, however, that these resources will be sufficient to meet our needs. We may also consider other options available to us in connection with future liquidity needs, including, but not limited to, the postponement of discretionary contributions to post-employment benefit plans, the postponement of capital expenditures, restructuring of our credit facilities, and issuance of new debt or equity securities.
Our interest expense may vary in the future because the revolving credit facility and term loan interest rates are variable, including both new term loan facilities. The interest rate is fixed on the senior subordinated notes, but we have taken actions to repay that fixed rate debt and replace it with variable rate debt as described above. We are required under the terms of the August 2010 amendment and restatement of our credit facilities to hedge 35% of term loan principal outstanding with fixed or maximum interest rate derivatives. Our weighted average interest rate on all debt was 7.58% as of June 30, 2010, compared to 7.54% as of December 31, 2009.
Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2010 were $72.8 million, compared to $55.1 million at December 31, 2009. As of June 30, 2010, the majority of our cash was held at our foreign operations.
Cash provided by operating activities is summarized in the following table:
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Net income | | $ | 19,226 | | $ | 5,189 | |
Non-cash items | | 15,264 | | 12,889 | |
Subtotal | | 34,490 | | 18,078 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net | | (2,525 | ) | 529 | |
Discontinued operations, net | | (574 | ) | (534 | ) |
Cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 31,391 | | $ | 18,073 | |
Non-cash items consist of expenses for depreciation of property, plant, and equipment; amortization; stock compensation and other non-cash charges; asset impairment charges; the tax benefit or expense from share-based compensation; deferred income taxes; and gains or losses on disposal of assets.
During the first six months of 2010, operating activities provided $31.4 million of cash. Income from continuing operations plus non-cash items totaled $34.5 million in the first half of 2010, reflecting increased income and non-cash items compared with the first half of 2009. The increased amount of non-cash items in 2010 is primarily due to higher levels of depreciation of property, plant, and equipment, fluctuations in deferred income taxes, and the non-recurring gain on the sale of land and building recognized in 2009. Partially offsetting these increases was the non-recurrence of an asset impairment charge of $2.0 million recognized in 2009 related to the closure of our manufacturing plant in Milan, Tennessee. The net change in working capital components and other assets and liabilities during the first six months of 2010 used $2.5 million in cash. An increase in accounts receivable of $5.7 million, reflecting increased sales levels in the second quarter, an increase of $5.7 million in inventories to support higher shipment levels, and a decrease in other liabilities of $2.8 million, all used cash during the period. These uses were partially offset by a decrease in other assets of $3.5 million, including the collection of income taxes receivable in certain jurisdictions, and an increase in accrued expenses of $8.0 million.
Discontinued operations used $0.6 million in cash during the first half of 2010 as certain accrued obligations and liabilities related to these former operations were paid. Cash payments during the first half of 2010 also included $10.4 million for interest and $3.8 million for income taxes. The Company expects to contribute a total of $14 million to $16 million to its defined benefit pension plans during 2010, with a majority of it expected to be paid in the second half of the year.
30
Table of Contents
During the first six months of 2009, operating activities provided $18.1 million of cash. Income from continuing operations plus non-cash items totaled $18.1 million in the first half of 2009, reflecting reduced income compared with the first half of 2008. The net change in working capital components and other assets and liabilities during the same period provided $0.5 million in cash flow from operating activities. Decreases in accounts receivable of $12.1 million, inventories of $4.6 million and other assets of $2.6 million, together with an increase in other liabilities of $3.3 million, all positively affected cash flows from operating activities. These positive effects were partially offset by reductions in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $22.0 million. Discontinued operations used $0.5 million in cash during the first half of 2009 as certain accrued obligations and liabilities related to these former operations were paid. Cash payments during the first half of 2009 also included $10.1 million for interest and $7.3 million for income taxes.
Cash used in investing activities is summarized as follows:
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment | | $ | (8,641 | ) | $ | (8,511 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of assets | | 22 | | 3,256 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | $ | (8,619 | ) | $ | (5,255 | ) |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment are primarily for productivity improvements, expanded manufacturing capacity, and replacement of consumable tooling and equipment. Generally, about one-third of our capital spending represents replacement of consumable tooling, dies and existing equipment, with the remainder devoted to capacity and productivity improvements. During 2010, we expect to invest $21 million to $25 million in available cash for capital expenditures, compared to $17.3 million for the full year in 2009.
Cash used in financing activities is summarized as follows:
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Net decrease in debt principal outstanding | | $ | (5,443 | ) | $ | (18,746 | ) |
Issuance costs related to debt | | — | | (1,900 | ) |
Proceeds and tax effects from stock-based compensation | | 74 | | (348 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | $ | (5,369 | ) | $ | (20,994 | ) |
Cash used in financing activities in the first half of 2010 consisted of net repayments of principal on our revolving credit and term debt facilities of $5.4 million. Cash used in financing activities in the first half of 2009 consisted of $18.7 million in net repayments of principal on our revolving credit and term debt facilities. We also incurred $1.9 million in costs to amend and extend the maturity date of our revolving credit facility in the first half of 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In the opinion of management, there are currently no recent accounting pronouncements to be adopted that are expected to have a significant effect on our financial reporting.
Forward Looking Statements
“Forward looking statements,” as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, used in this report, including without limitation our “outlook,” “guidance,” “expectations,” “beliefs,” “plans,” “indications,” “estimates,” “anticipations,” and their variants, are based upon available information and upon assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable; however, these forward looking statements involve certain risks and should not be
31
Table of Contents
considered indicative of actual results that the Company may achieve in the future. Specifically, issues concerning availability and estimated costs of financing, the global economic climate, foreign currency exchange rates, the cost to the Company of commodities in general, and of steel in particular, the anticipated level of applicable interest rates, and the anticipated effects of discontinued operations involve certain estimates and assumptions. To the extent that these, or any other such assumptions, are not realized going forward, or other unforeseen factors arise, actual results for the periods subsequent to the date of this report may differ materially.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risks from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices, including raw materials such as steel. We manage our exposure to these market risks through our regular operating and financing activities, and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivatives. When utilized, derivatives are used as risk management tools and not for trading or speculative purposes.
We manage our ratio of fixed to variable rate debt with the objective of achieving a mix that management believes is appropriate. Our 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes carry a fixed interest rate. The interest rates are variable on our term and revolver loans and we are subject to market risk from movement in benchmark rates.
See also, the Market Risk section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our most recent Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 9, 2010, for further discussion of market risk.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) respectively, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
32
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits:
**4.1 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 4, 2009 among Blount, Inc., Gear Products, Inc., Omark Properties, Inc., Windsor Forestry Tools LLC, the other credit parties signatory thereto, General Electric Capital Corporation, and the other Lenders party thereto.
**31.1 Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Joshua L. Collins, President and Chief Executive Officer.
**31.2 Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Calvin E. Jenness, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
**32.1 Certification pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Joshua L. Collins, President and Chief Executive Officer.
**32.2 Certification pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Calvin E. Jenness, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
** Filed electronically herewith. Copies of such exhibits may be obtained upon written request from:
Blount International, Inc.
P.O. Box 22127
Portland, Oregon 97269-2127
33
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.
BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC. | | |
Registrant | | |
| | |
| | |
/s/ Calvin E. Jenness | | /s/ Mark V. Allred |
Calvin E. Jenness | | Mark V. Allred |
Senior Vice President and | | Vice President and Corporate Controller |
Chief Financial Officer | | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
(Principal Financial Officer) | | |
| | |
| | |
Dated: August 9, 2010 | | |
34