Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010.
OR
o Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission file number 001-11549
BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | | 63 0780521 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
4909 SE International Way, Portland, Oregon | | 97222-4679 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(503) 653-8881
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer x |
| | |
Non-accelerated filer o | | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of November 4, 2010 there were 48,126,844 shares outstanding of $0.01 par value common stock.
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Blount International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 162,581 | | $ | 126,923 | | $ | 440,498 | | $ | 348,473 | |
Cost of sales | | 112,174 | | 83,081 | | 289,900 | | 234,490 | |
Gross profit | | 50,407 | | 43,842 | | 150,598 | | 113,983 | |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | | 29,702 | | 23,113 | | 86,560 | | 70,850 | |
Gain on sale of land and building | | — | | — | | — | | (2,701 | ) |
Plant closure and severance costs | | — | | 482 | | — | | 6,886 | |
Operating income | | 20,705 | | 20,247 | | 64,038 | | 38,948 | |
Interest income | | 7 | | 35 | | 82 | | 190 | |
Interest expense | | (7,720 | ) | (6,159 | ) | (20,647 | ) | (18,516 | ) |
Other income (expense), net | | (7,189 | ) | 368 | | (7,221 | ) | 406 | |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | | 5,803 | | 14,491 | | 36,252 | | 21,028 | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (4,757 | ) | 3,491 | | 7,207 | | 5,378 | |
Income from continuing operations | | 10,560 | | 11,000 | | 29,045 | | 15,650 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes | | 11,796 | | 538 | | 12,964 | | 1,377 | |
Provision for income taxes | | 6,743 | | 196 | | 7,171 | | 496 | |
Income from discontinued operations | | 5,053 | | 342 | | 5,793 | | 881 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 15,613 | | $ | 11,342 | | $ | 34,838 | | $ | 16,531 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | 0.22 | | $ | 0.23 | | $ | 0.61 | | $ | 0.33 | |
Discontinued operations | | 0.11 | | 0.01 | | 0.12 | | 0.02 | |
Net income | | $ | 0.33 | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.73 | | $ | 0.35 | |
Diluted earnings per share | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | 0.22 | | $ | 0.23 | | $ | 0.60 | | $ | 0.32 | |
Discontinued operations | | 0.10 | | — | | 0.12 | | 0.02 | |
Net income | | $ | 0.32 | | $ | 0.23 | | $ | 0.72 | | $ | 0.34 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares used in per share calculations: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | 47,902 | | 47,766 | | 47,844 | | 47,751 | |
Diluted | | 48,424 | | 48,271 | | 48,364 | | 48,210 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Blount International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | |
Assets | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 91,000 | | $ | 55,070 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,860 and $3,339, respectively | | 85,651 | | 74,475 | |
Inventories, net | | 103,730 | | 78,179 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 10,844 | | 5,528 | |
Other current assets | | 17,650 | | 23,962 | |
Total current assets | | 308,875 | | 237,214 | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | 108,051 | | 114,470 | |
Deferred income taxes | | — | | 16,006 | |
Intangible assets | | 59,582 | | 12,371 | |
Goodwill | | 103,700 | | 66,071 | |
Other assets | | 28,106 | | 37,434 | |
Total Assets | | $ | 608,314 | | $ | 483,566 | |
| | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | $ | 7,687 | | $ | 5,013 | |
Accounts payable | | 39,941 | | 31,539 | |
Accrued expenses | | 64,386 | | 50,614 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 318 | | 501 | |
Total current liabilities | | 112,332 | | 87,667 | |
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities | | 367,013 | | 280,852 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 9,507 | | 4,695 | |
Employee benefit obligations | | 67,679 | | 75,780 | |
Other liabilities | | 20,753 | | 41,312 | |
Total liabilities | | 577,284 | | 490,306 | |
Commitments and contingent liabilities | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity (deficit): | | | | | |
Common stock: par value $0.01 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 47,967,858 and 47,759,331 outstanding, respectively | | 479 | | 478 | |
Capital in excess of par value of stock | | 584,961 | | 581,211 | |
Accumulated deficit | | (521,717 | ) | (556,555 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (32,693 | ) | (31,874 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | 31,030 | | (6,740 | ) |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | | $ | 608,314 | | $ | 483,566 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Blount International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 34,838 | | $ | 16,531 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations | | (5,793 | ) | (881 | ) |
Early extinguishment of debt | | 7,110 | | — | |
Depreciation of property, plant, and equipment | | 15,692 | | 14,284 | |
Amortization of intangible assets and deferred financing costs | | 4,013 | | 4,250 | |
Stock compensation and other non-cash charges | | 2,758 | | 2,066 | |
Asset impairment charges | | 264 | | 1,960 | |
Excess tax expense (benefit) from stock-based compensation | | (358 | ) | 68 | |
Deferred income tax benefit | | (574 | ) | (1,730 | ) |
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets | | 826 | | (2,552 | ) |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of impact of acquisition: | | | | | |
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable | | (4,800 | ) | 3,644 | |
(Increase) decrease in inventories | | (9,271 | ) | 9,745 | |
(Increase) decrease in other assets | | 14,859 | | 728 | |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | | (2,231 | ) | (3,905 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses | | 4,834 | | (12,295 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | | (30,575 | ) | (5,832 | ) |
Discontinued operations | | 1,106 | | 2,774 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | 32,698 | | 28,855 | |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment | | (14,017 | ) | (12,737 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of assets | | 126 | | 3,282 | |
Acquisition of SpeeCo, net of cash acquired | | (90,854 | ) | — | |
Discontinued operations | | 25,176 | | (332 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (79,569 | ) | (9,787 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Net borrowing (repayment) of principal under revolving credit facility | | 21,300 | | (3,250 | ) |
Proceeds from term loans | | 350,000 | | — | |
Repayment of term loan principal | | (107,465 | ) | (12,026 | ) |
Repayment of 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes | | (175,000 | ) | — | |
Issuance costs related to debt | | (6,863 | ) | (1,900 | ) |
Excess tax (expense) benefit from stock-based compensation | | 358 | | (68 | ) |
Proceeds from stock-based compensation activity | | 1,308 | | 231 | |
Payment of employee taxes on restricted stock awards | | (333 | ) | (328 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 83,305 | | (17,341 | ) |
| | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes | | (504 | ) | (1,862 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | 35,930 | | (135 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | 55,070 | | 58,275 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 91,000 | | $ | 58,140 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Blount International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Amounts in thousands) | | Shares | | Common Stock | | Capital in Excess of Par | | Accumulated Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance December 31, 2009 | | 47,759 | | $ | 478 | | $ | 581,211 | | $ | (556,555 | ) | $ | (31,874 | ) | $ | (6,740 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | | | | | | 34,838 | | | | 34,838 | |
Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation | | | | | | | | | | 489 | | 489 | |
Unrealized losses | | | | | | | | | | (1,308 | ) | (1,308 | ) |
Comprehensive income, net | | | | | | | | | | | | 34,019 | |
Stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”), & restricted stock | | 209 | | 1 | | 1,332 | | | | | | 1,333 | |
Stock compensation expense | | | | | | 2,418 | | | | | | 2,418 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance September 30, 2010 | | 47,968 | | $ | 479 | | $ | 584,961 | | $ | (521,717 | ) | $ | (32,693 | ) | $ | 31,030 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) was $3.0 million and ($0.8) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. These amounts are net of a deferred tax expense (benefit) of $0.2 million and ($0.8) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. Other comprehensive income, net of a deferred tax expense of $0.9 million and $1.8 million, was $2.4 million and $4.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Basis of Presentation. The unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Blount International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Blount” or the “Company”) and are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, the Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) for the periods presented.
The accompanying financial data as of September 30, 2010 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 has been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The December 31, 2009 Consolidated Balance Sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. These Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires that management make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We base our estimates on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management is continually evaluating and updating these estimates and it is reasonably possible that these estimates will change in the near term.
Reclassifications. Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications have no effect on previously reported consolidated net income, cash flows, or net stockholders’ equity (deficit).
NOTE 2: ACQUISITION OF SPEECO AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
On August 10, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of SP Companies, Inc. (“SpeeCo”) pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated August 9, 2010. SpeeCo, located in Golden, Colorado, was founded in 1957 and is a supplier of log splitters, post-hole diggers, tractor three-point linkage parts and equipment, and farm and ranch accessories. The acquisition of SpeeCo expands our product offerings to our current markets and customers, as well as offering opportunities for synergies in the areas of marketing, sales, and distribution, including marketing SpeeCo’s products to our international customers. We also expect to benefit from the acquisition of SpeeCo by leveraging its experience in low-cost sourcing of materials and components.
We paid $91.7 million in cash for SpeeCo. As part of the stock acquisition we assumed liabilities totaling $31.0 million. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, none of SpeeCo’s debt was assumed by Blount. SpeeCo had $0.8 million in cash on the closing date, resulting in a net cash outflow of $90.9 million for the acquisition. Additionally, we incurred legal and other third party fees totaling $0.7 million resulting in a total cash outflow of $91.6 million for the acquisition. These fees were expensed to selling, general, and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) in the Consolidated Statements of Income in the second and third quarters of 2010. The acquisition was financed with a combination of cash on hand and borrowing under the Company’s revolving credit facility. The operating results of SpeeCo are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements from the date of acquisition forward.
7
Table of Contents
The Company accounted for the acquisition in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Section 805. Accordingly, SpeeCo’s assets and liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The Company estimated the fair value of assets using various methods and considering, among other factors, projected discounted cash flows, replacement cost less an allowance for depreciation, recent comparable transactions, and historical book values. The Company estimated the fair value of inventory by considering the stage of completion of the inventory, estimated costs to complete the manufacturing and assembly process, and the normal gross profit margin typically associated with its sale. The Company estimated the fair value of liabilities assumed considering the historical book values and projected future cash flows. The fair value of goodwill represents the residual enterprise value which does not qualify for separate recognition, including the value of the assembled workforce. Approximately $7.0 million of the SpeeCo goodwill is amortizable and deductible for U.S. income tax purposes. The Company has conducted a preliminary assessment of liabilities arising from tax matters related to SpeeCo, and has recognized provisional amounts in its initial accounting for the acquisition for the identified tax liabilities. However, the Company is continuing its review of these matters during the measurement period, and if new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date identifies adjustments to the tax liabilities initially recognized, as well as any additional tax liabilities that existed as of the acquisition date, the acquisition accounting will be revised to reflect the resulting adjustments to the provisional tax amounts initially recognized. A summary of the purchase price allocation for the fair value of the assets acquired and the obligations assumed at the date of the acquisition is presented below.
Summary of SpeeCo Purchase Price Allocation
(Amounts in thousands) | | August 10, 2010 | |
Cash | | $ | 816 | |
Accounts receivable | | 7,525 | |
Inventories | | 18,868 | |
Current intangible assets subject to amortization | | 401 | |
Other current assets | | 1,282 | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | 1,812 | |
Non-current intangible assets subject to amortization | | 43,214 | |
Goodwill and other intangible assets not subject to amortization | | 48,762 | |
Total assets acquired | | $ | 122,680 | |
| | | |
Current liabilities | | $ | 13,762 | |
Non-current liabilities | | 106 | |
Deferred income tax liability | | 17,142 | |
Total liabilities assumed | | 31,010 | |
Cash paid for acquisition, before consideration of cash acquired | | $ | 91,670 | |
Included in operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are non-cash charges totaling $1.6 million for amortization of intangible assets and expense for the step-up to fair value of inventories related to SpeeCo.
8
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the Company’s intangible assets related to SpeeCo and earlier acquisitions:
| | | | September 30, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 | |
| | Life | | Gross Carrying | | Accumulated | | Gross Carrying | | Accumulated | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | In Years | | Amount | | Amortization | | Amount | | Amortization | |
Goodwill, SpeeCo acquisition | | Indefinite | | $ | 42,794 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
Goodwill, Gear Products (Note 3) | | Indefinite | | — | | — | | 5,165 | | — | |
Goodwill, previous acquisitions | | Indefinite | | 60,906 | | — | | 60,906 | | — | |
Total goodwill | | | | 103,700 | | — | | 66,071 | | — | |
Trademarks and trade names | | Indefinite | | 11,469 | | — | | 5,500 | | — | |
Total with indefinite lives | | | | 115,169 | | — | | 71,571 | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Backlog | | 0.1 – 0.7 | | 1,641 | | 1,641 | | 1,240 | | 1,240 | |
Covenants not to compete | | 2 – 4 | | 1,112 | | 501 | | 590 | | 328 | |
Patents | | 11 - 13 | | 5,320 | | 579 | | 518 | | 518 | |
Customer relationships | | 10 - 19 | | 46,090 | | 3,329 | | 8,200 | | 1,591 | |
Total with finite lives | | | | 54,163 | | 6,050 | | 10,548 | | 3,677 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total intangible assets | | | | $ | 169,332 | | $ | 6,050 | | $ | 82,119 | | $ | 3,677 | |
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $1.6 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $2.4 million and $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Amortization expense for these intangible assets is expected to total $4.4 million in 2010, $6.8 million in 2011, $5.8 million in 2012, and $5.1 million in 2013.
The following unaudited pro forma results present the estimated effect as if the acquisition of SpeeCo had occurred on the first day of each period presented. The unaudited pro forma results include the historical results of SpeeCo, pro forma purchase accounting effects, pro forma interest expense effects of additional borrowings to fund the transaction and the related pro forma income tax effects. In addition to the pro forma amortization of intangible asset adjustments to fair value, the unaudited pro forma results for all periods presented include charges of $0.5 million to expense the adjustment of inventory to estimated fair value and $0.4 million to amortize the estimated fair value of SpeeCo’s backlog on the date of acquisition.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | As Reported | | Pro Forma (Unaudited) | | As Reported | | Pro Forma (Unaudited) | |
Sales | | $ | 162,581 | | $ | 172,136 | | $ | 126,923 | | $ | 150,001 | |
Net income | | 15,613 | | 14,911 | | 11,342 | | 11,209 | |
Basic income per share | | $ | 0.33 | | $ | 0.31 | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.23 | |
Diluted income per share | | 0.32 | | 0.30 | | 0.23 | | 0.22 | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2010 | | 2009 | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | As Reported | | Pro Forma (Unaudited) | | As Reported | | Pro Forma (Unaudited) | |
Sales | | $ | 440,498 | | $ | 485,628 | | $ | 348,473 | | $ | 401,522 | |
Net income | | 34,838 | | 34,225 | | 16,531 | | 14,288 | |
Basic income per share | | $ | 0.73 | | $ | 0.72 | | $ | 0.35 | | $ | 0.30 | |
Diluted income per share | | 0.72 | | 0.71 | | 0.34 | | 0.29 | |
9
Table of Contents
NOTE 3: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On September 30, 2010, we sold our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Gear Products, Inc. (“Gear Products”) to Tulsa Winch, Inc., an operating unit of Dover Industrial Products, Inc., for initial cash proceeds of $25.2 million. Cash proceeds from the sale are expected to be $24.8 million after finalization of the purchase price. Gear Products is a manufacturer of mechanical power transmission components for original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), serving the utility, construction, forestry, marine, and mining markets. Under terms of the stock purchase agreement, the parties agreed to treat the stock sale as if it were an asset sale for income tax purposes, which resulted in an increase in income tax expense recognized on the sale. Gear Products results, which were previously reported within the Other category in our segment disclosures, are now reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented, and are summarized below:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 4,575 | | $ | 3,438 | | $ | 12,297 | | $ | 12,413 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | $ | (145 | ) | $ | 538 | | $ | 1,023 | | $ | 1,377 | |
Gain on sale of subsidiary | | 11,941 | | — | | 11,941 | | — | |
Income before income taxes | | 11,796 | | 538 | | 12,964 | | 1,377 | |
Income tax provision | | 6,743 | | 196 | | 7,171 | | 496 | |
Income from discontinued operations | | $ | 5,053 | | $ | 342 | | $ | 5,793 | | $ | 881 | |
NOTE 4: RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
Gain on Sale of Land and Building. On June 25, 2009, we sold the land and building representing the location of our previous European headquarters and distribution center. These operations were moved into nearby leased facilities. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $2.7 million on the sale in the second quarter of 2009.
Plant Closure Costs. In the second quarter of 2009, we closed our manufacturing facility in Milan, Tennessee. Products previously manufactured in that facility are now produced in our other manufacturing facilities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized a total of $3.8 million in charges related to this plant closure, consisting of $2.0 million in asset impairment charges, $1.0 million in employee severance and benefit costs, and $0.8 million in other expenses. Of these charges, $0.3 million are recognized in cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The land and building are currently being marketed for sale, and are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Severance Costs. We took actions during 2009 to reduce the number of employees at certain of our locations in addition to the Milan facility mentioned above. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized a total of $0.5 million and $3.4 million, respectively, in severance charges related to this reduction in force.
NOTE 5: INVENTORIES, NET
Inventories consisted of the following:
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Raw materials and supplies | | $ | 18,170 | | $ | 11,510 | |
Work in progress | | 14,949 | | 13,095 | |
Finished goods | | 70,611 | | 53,574 | |
Total inventories, net | | $ | 103,730 | | $ | 78,179 | |
10
Table of Contents
NOTE 6: PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant, and equipment consisted of the following:
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Land | | $ | 7,202 | | $ | 7,392 | |
Buildings and improvements | | 55,885 | | 58,335 | |
Machinery and equipment | | 212,068 | | 222,545 | |
Furniture, fixtures, and office equipment | | 30,346 | | 28,783 | |
Transportation equipment | | 950 | | 1,116 | |
Construction in progress | | 7,198 | | 6,345 | |
Accumulated depreciation | | (205,598 | ) | (210,046 | ) |
Total property, plant, and equipment, net | | $ | 108,051 | | $ | 114,470 | |
NOTE 7: LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Revolving credit facility | | $ | 24,700 | | $ | 3,400 | |
Term loan A | | 75,000 | | — | |
Term loan B | | 275,000 | | 107,465 | |
8 7/8% senior subordinated notes | | — | | 175,000 | |
Total debt | | 374,700 | | 285,865 | |
Less current maturities | | (7,687 | ) | (5,013 | ) |
Long-term debt | | $ | 367,013 | | $ | 280,852 | |
Weighted average interest rate on outstanding debt | | 5.17 | % | 7.54 | % |
Senior Credit Facilities. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Blount, Inc., first entered into a credit agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation as agent on May 15, 2003. The agreement has been amended and restated on several occasions, most recently on August 9, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, the senior credit facilities consist of a revolving credit facility, a term loan A, and a term loan B.
April 2009 Amendment to Revolving Credit Facility. On April 30, 2009, we entered into an amendment to the revolving credit facility that extended the maturity date to August 9, 2010, reduced the availability to $90.0 million, and increased the interest rate and commitment fees. This amendment did not affect the term loan B facility in place at that time. The Company incurred fees and third party costs of $2.0 million related to this amendment.
December 2009 Amendment and Restatement of Senior Credit Facilities. On December 4, 2009, the senior credit facility was amended and restated to extend the maturity date for both the revolving credit facility and the term loan B facility to February 9, 2012, reduce the availability under the revolving credit facility to $60.0 million, increase the interest rate on the term loan B, and modify certain financial covenants. The Company incurred fees and third party costs of $3.3 million related to this amendment and restatement. Existing term loans representing $3.9 million of the total of $107.5 million term loan principal outstanding at the time were not affected by this amendment and restatement, and the terms for this portion of the term loans remained unchanged, including interest at the prime rate and a maturity date of August 9, 2010. The principal amount of these unchanged term loans was included in current maturities of long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009, and was paid in full on August 9, 2010.
11
Table of Contents
August 2010 Amendment and Restatement of Senior Credit Facilities. On August 9, 2010, the Company entered into an amendment and restatement of its senior credit facilities that included the following terms:
· Maximum borrowings under the revolving credit facility were increased to $75.0 million and the maturity date was extended to August 2015.
· The term loan B facility was increased to $275.0 million and the maturity date was extended to August 2016.
· The interest rates on the revolving credit facility and the term loan B were changed, as described below.
· A term loan A facility was established at $75.0 million with a maturity date of August 2015.
· Certain financial and other covenants were amended and revised, as described below.
· The Company paid $6.9 million in fees and transaction costs in connection with these transactions.
The Company used the $350.0 million combined proceeds of the term loans and repaid the principal outstanding under its previous term loan B facility and its 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes originally due August 1, 2012, following the expiration of the required redemption notification period. These 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes were redeemed in full on September 16, 2010. In conjunction with the redemption of the 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes, and the repayment of principal on the previous term loan B, the Company expensed $3.5 million in unamortized deferred financing costs.
The revolving credit facility provides for total available borrowings up to $75.0 million, reduced by outstanding letters of credit and further restricted by a specific leverage ratio. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had the ability to borrow an additional $47.0 million under the terms of the revolving credit agreement. On October 1, 2010, we applied the proceeds from the sale of Gear Products to the outstanding principal on the revolving credit facility and availability under the revolving credit facility was increased to approximately $72 million. The revolving credit facility bears interest at the LIBOR rate, as defined in the credit agreement (the “LIBOR Rate”), plus 3.50%, or the index rate, as described in the credit agreement (the “Index Rate”), plus 2.50%, and matures on August 9, 2015. Interest is payable on the individual maturity dates for each LIBOR-based borrowing and monthly on Index Rate-based borrowings. Any outstanding principal is due in its entirety on the maturity date.
The term loan A bears interest at the LIBOR Rate plus 3.50%, or the Index Rate plus 2.50%, and matures on August 9, 2015. The term loan A facility requires quarterly principal payments of $1.9 million commencing on January 1, 2011, with a final payment of $39.4 million due on the maturity date. Once repaid, principal under the term loan A facility may not be re-borrowed.
The term loan B bears interest at the LIBOR Rate plus 4.00%, or the Index Rate plus 3.00%, and matures on August 9, 2016. The term loan B facility requires quarterly principal payments of $0.7 million commencing on January 1, 2011, with a final payment of $259.2 million due on the maturity date. Once repaid, principal under the term loan B facility may not be re-borrowed.
The amended and restated senior credit facilities contain financial covenants relating to:
· Maximum capital expenditures of $42.5 million per calendar year.
· Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.15, defined as earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and certain other items (“EBITDA”) divided by cash payments for interest, taxes, capital expenditures, scheduled debt principal payments, and certain other items, calculated on a trailing twelve-month basis.
· Maximum leverage ratio of 4.25, defined as total debt divided by EBITDA, calculated on a trailing twelve-month basis.
In addition, there are covenants or restrictions relating to, among other categories, acquisitions, investments, loans and advances, indebtedness, dividends on our stock, and the sale of stock or assets. We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of September 30, 2010. Non-compliance with these covenants, if it were to become an event of default under the terms of the credit agreement, could result in severe limitations to our overall liquidity, and the term loan lenders could require immediate repayment of outstanding amounts, potentially requiring sale of our assets. Our debt is not subject to any triggers that would require early payment due to any adverse change in our credit rating.
12
Table of Contents
The amended and restated senior credit facilities may be prepaid at any time. There can also be additional mandatory repayment requirements related to the sale of Company assets, the issuance of stock under certain circumstances, or upon the Company’s annual generation of excess cash flow, as determined under the credit agreement.
Blount International, Inc. and all of its domestic subsidiaries other than Blount, Inc. guarantee Blount, Inc.’s obligations under the senior credit facilities. The obligations under the senior credit facilities are collateralized by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of Blount, Inc. and its domestic subsidiaries, as well as a pledge of all of Blount, Inc.’s capital stock held by Blount International, Inc. and all of the stock of domestic subsidiaries held by Blount, Inc. Blount, Inc. has also pledged 65% of the stock of its non-domestic subsidiaries as additional collateral.
NOTE 8: PENSION AND OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans covering employees in the U.S., Canada, and Belgium. The Company also sponsors various other post-employment medical and benefit plans covering many of its current and former employees. The U.S. defined benefit pension plan and the associated nonqualified plan have been frozen since December 31, 2006. Employees who currently participate in these U.S. plans no longer accrue benefits and new employees hired since December 31, 2006, are not eligible to participate. All retirement benefits accrued up to the time of the freeze were preserved.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for these plans are as follows:
| | Pension Benefits | | Other Post-Employment Benefits | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Service cost | | $ | 624 | | $ | 548 | | $ | 67 | | $ | 66 | |
Interest cost | | 2,734 | | 2,656 | | 524 | | 505 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | (2,991 | ) | (2,504 | ) | — | | — | |
Amortization of prior service cost | | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | — | | — | |
Amortization of net actuarial losses | | 924 | | 1,261 | | 212 | | 192 | |
Total net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 1,289 | | $ | 1,959 | | $ | 803 | | $ | 763 | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Service cost | | $ | 1,872 | | $ | 1,644 | | $ | 201 | | $ | 198 | |
Interest cost | | 8,202 | | 7,968 | | 1,572 | | 1,515 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | (8,973 | ) | (7,512 | ) | — | | — | |
Amortization of prior service cost | | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | — | | — | |
Amortization of net actuarial losses | | 2,772 | | 3,783 | | 636 | | 576 | |
Total net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 3,867 | | $ | 5,877 | | $ | 2,409 | | $ | 2,289 | |
The Company expects to contribute a total of approximately $15 million to $17 million to its funded pension plans during 2010.
The Company receives a Medicare Part D subsidy for a portion of the cost of providing prescription drug benefits under its retiree medical benefit plan. In March of 2010, new legislation was signed into law in the U.S. that makes this subsidy fully subject to federal income tax beginning in 2013. Previously, this subsidy was essentially exempt from federal income tax. Accordingly, the Company recognized a charge of $1.7 million to income tax expense in the three months ended March 31, 2010, reflecting the write-off of the deferred tax asset related to this subsidy.
13
Table of Contents
NOTE 9: FINANCIAL GUARANTEES AND COMMITMENTS
Significant financial guarantees and commitments are summarized in the following table:
| | September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | |
Letters of credit outstanding | | $ | 3,330 | |
Other financial guarantees | | 1,253 | |
Total financial guarantees and commitments | | $ | 4,583 | |
NOTE 10: CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Company is a defendant in a number of product liability lawsuits, some of which seek significant or unspecified damages, involving serious personal injuries for which there are retentions or deductible amounts under the Company’s insurance policies. Some of these lawsuits arise out of the Company’s duty to indemnify certain purchasers of the Company’s discontinued operations for lawsuits involving products manufactured and sold prior to the sale of these businesses. In addition, the Company is a party to a number of other lawsuits arising out of the normal course of its business, including suits concerning commercial contracts, employee matters, intellectual property rights and other matters. In some instances the Company is the plaintiff and is seeking recovery of damages. In other instances, the Company is a defendant against whom damages are being sought. While there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of these lawsuits, management does not believe these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, operating results, or cash flows.
The Company accrues, by a charge to income, an amount representing management’s best estimate of the undiscounted probable loss related to any matter deemed by management and its counsel as a reasonably probable loss contingency in light of all of the then known circumstances.
In March 2010, the Company received an offer from Region 9 of the Environmental Protection Agency of the U.S. to resolve its potential liability regarding the Operating Industries, Inc. Superfund Site in Monterey Park, California, involving a subsidiary of the former Omark Industries, Inc., which merged with the Company in 1985. The Company submitted its consent to enter into an administrative settlement agreement for the Company’s pro rata share of the site’s clean-up costs as a de minimis participant. Accordingly, the Company recognized a charge of $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2010 in settlement of this matter. However, the settlement agreement is subject to a public comment period of 30 days and other procedures pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. The Company is awaiting notice from the EPA that the de minimis settlement agreement has been accepted by a sufficient number of parties to begin the public comment process.
NOTE 11: EARNINGS PER SHARE DATA
Shares used in the denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations were as follows:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Shares in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Shares for basic per share computation — weighted average common shares outstanding | | 47,902 | | 47,766 | | 47,844 | | 47,751 | |
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents | | 522 | | 505 | | 520 | | 459 | |
Shares for diluted per share computation | | 48,424 | | 48,271 | | 48,364 | | 48,210 | |
Options and SARs excluded from computation as anti-dilutive because they are out-of-the-money | | 2,029 | | 1,547 | | 1,929 | | 1,607 | |
The amount of unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) considered participating securities at September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was 132 thousand and 176 thousand, respectively. The allocation of undistributed earnings (net income) to the participating securities under the two class method had no effect on the calculation of earnings per share.
14
Table of Contents
NOTE 12: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company did not grant any stock-based compensation awards during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 but did grant the following awards during the nine months ended September 30, 2010:
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | Shares | | Aggregate Fair Value | |
SARs granted | | 565 | | $ | 3,175 | |
RSUs granted | | 120 | | $ | 1,335 | |
The majority of the SARs and RSUs granted in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 vest in one twelfth tranches quarterly over a three-year period and are restricted from exercise, sale, or other transfer until March 31, 2013. The SARs granted have a ten-year term from date of issuance.
The following assumptions and information was used to estimate the fair value of SARs in the nine months ended September 30, 2010:
| | 2010 | |
Estimated average life | | 6 years | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 2.8 | % |
Expected volatility | | 49.8 | % |
Weighted average volatility | | 49.8 | % |
Dividend yield | | 0.0 | % |
Exercise price | | $ | 11.84 | |
Weighted average grant date fair value | | $ | 5.95 | |
As of September 30, 2010, the total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to previously granted awards was $6.4 million. The weighted average period over which this expense is expected to be recognized is 27 months. The Company’s policy upon the exercise of options, restricted stock awards, RSUs, or SARs has been to issue new shares into the public market from the stockholder-approved 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
NOTE 13: SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Interest paid | | $ | 24,052 | | $ | 19,674 | |
Income taxes paid, net | | 9,119 | | 9,932 | |
| | | | | | | |
NOTE 14: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CREDIT RISK CONCENTRATION
The Company has manufacturing or distribution operations in Brazil, Canada, China, Europe, Japan, Russia, and the U.S. The Company sells to customers in these locations and other countries throughout the world. At September 30, 2010, approximately 66% of accounts receivable were from customers outside the U.S. If the U.S. Dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, it becomes more costly for these foreign customers to pay their U.S. Dollar balances owed. They may have difficulty in repaying these amounts, and, in turn, the Company’s bad debt expense may increase. Accounts receivable are principally from distributors, dealers, mass merchants, chainsaw manufacturers, and other OEMs and are normally not collateralized.
15
Table of Contents
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The carrying amount of accounts receivable approximates fair value because the maturity period is short and the Company has reduced the carrying amount to the estimated net realizable value with an allowance for doubtful accounts. The carrying amount of any principal outstanding on the revolving credit facility approximates fair value because the applicable interest rates are variable and the maturity period is relatively short on each borrowing tranche. The fair value of the term loans is determined by reference to prices of recent transactions whereby buyers and sellers exchange their interests in portions of these loans. The fair value of the fixed rate 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes was determined as of December 31, 2009 by reference to quoted market prices. Derivative financial instruments are carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The carrying amount of other financial instruments approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity periods and variable interest rates associated with the instruments.
The estimated fair values of the term loans and 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are presented below.
| | September 30, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | |
Term loans | | $ | 350,000 | | $ | 351,750 | | $ | 107,465 | | $ | 107,734 | |
8 7/8% senior subordinated notes | | — | | — | | 175,000 | | 178,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Financial Instruments and Foreign Currency Hedging. The Company makes regular payments to its wholly-owned subsidiary in Canada, Blount Canada Ltd. (“Blount Canada”), for contract manufacturing services performed by Blount Canada for conversion of raw materials into finished goods. We are exposed to changes in Canadian Dollar to U.S. Dollar exchange rates from these transactions since most conversion costs are incurred in Canadian Dollars. Changes in the Canadian Dollar to U.S. Dollar exchange rates may adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
Since October of 2008, we have managed a portion of Canadian Dollar exchange rate exposures with derivative financial instruments. These derivative financial instruments are zero-cost collar option combinations, consisting of a purchased call option to buy Canadian Dollars and a written put option to sell Canadian Dollars. We apply cash flow hedge accounting to our Canadian Dollar-related derivative financial instruments, and therefore defer the gains or losses on those instruments in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets until maturity, or if it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur, at which time the gain or loss is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
As of September 30, 2010, the cumulative unrealized pre-tax gain on these contracts included in other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was $0.1 million. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, gains of $0.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, were recognized in cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Income at the maturity of the related Canadian Dollar derivative financial instruments. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, a gain of $0.4 million and a loss of $0.6 million, respectively, were recognized in cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Income at the maturity of the related Canadian Dollar derivative financial instruments. Gains and losses on these Canadian Dollar derivative financial instruments are largely offset in cost of goods sold by the effects of currency exchange rate changes on the underlying transactions. Through September 30, 2010, the Company has not recognized any amount from these contracts in earnings due to ineffectiveness, or due to a probability that the forecasted transaction will not occur. The aggregate notional amount of these Canadian Dollar contracts outstanding was $31.8 million at September 30, 2010 and $30.3 million at December 31, 2009.
We hedge the interest rate and foreign currency exposure on a portion of our cash and cash equivalents invested in Brazil with interest rate swap agreements. The change in fair value of these instruments is recognized in interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Any change in fair value of these derivative contracts is fully offset by the change in fair value of the underlying investments. The Consolidated Statements of Income include income of $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, and income of $0.7 million and expense of $1.0 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, from the change in fair value of these interest rate swap contracts. There was no impact from these interest rate swap contracts in the three months ended September 30, 2010. The aggregate notional amount of these interest rate swap agreements outstanding was zero at September 30, 2010 and $13.0 million at December 31, 2009.
16
Table of Contents
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., the framework for measuring fair value is based on independent observable inputs of market data under the following hierarchy:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 — Significant observable inputs based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuations for which all significant assumptions are observable.
Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The fair values of derivatives held by the Company were:
(Amounts in thousands) | | Carrying Value | | Measured at Fair Value | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | |
September 30, 2010 | | $ | 93 | | $ | 93 | | $ | — | | $ | 93 | | $ | — | |
December 31, 2009 | | 2,052 | | 2,052 | | — | | 2,052 | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The fair value of these Level 2 derivatives was determined using a market approach based on daily market prices of similar instruments issued by financial institutions in an active market.
The amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are expected to be recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income within the next twelve months.
NOTE 15: RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In January 2010, the FASB issued new guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures that were effective in two phases. The new guidance requiring enhanced disclosures about an entity’s fair value measurements was effective for us on January 1, 2010 and resulted in expanded footnote disclosures about the fair value of our assets. The new guidance requiring enhanced disclosures in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements will be effective for us on January 1, 2011 and will result in expanded footnote disclosures.
NOTE 16: INCOME TAXES
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company released a net amount of $5.9 million in previously provided income tax expense on uncertain tax positions, due to the expiration of the related statute of limitations. These uncertain tax positions were previously included in other non-current assets and other non-current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
17
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.
Acquisition of SpeeCo
On August 10, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of SpeeCo. SpeeCo, located in Golden, Colorado, is a supplier of log splitters, post-hole diggers, tractor three-point linkage parts and equipment, and farm and ranch accessories. The acquisition of SpeeCo expands our product offerings to our current markets and customers, as well as offering opportunities for synergies in the areas of marketing, sales, and distribution, including marketing SpeeCo’s products to our international customers. We also expect to benefit from the acquisition of SpeeCo by leveraging its experience in low-cost sourcing of materials and components.
We paid $91.7 million in cash for SpeeCo. As part of the stock acquisition we assumed liabilities totaling $31.0 million. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, none of SpeeCo’s debt was assumed by Blount. SpeeCo had $0.8 million in cash on the closing date, resulting in a net cash outflow of $90.9 million for the acquisition. Additionally, we incurred legal and other third party fees totaling $0.7 million resulting in a total cash outflow of $91.6 million for the acquisition. These fees were expensed to SG&A in the Consolidated Statements of Income in the second and third quarters of 2010. The acquisition was financed with a combination of cash on hand and borrowing under the Company’s revolving credit facility.
SpeeCo’s assets and liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The Company estimated the fair value of assets using various methods and considering, among other factors, projected discounted cash flows, replacement cost less an allowance for depreciation, recent comparable transactions, and historical book values. The Company estimated the fair value of inventory by considering the stage of completion of the inventory, estimated costs to complete the manufacturing and assembly process, and the normal gross profit margin typically associated with its sale. The Company estimated the fair value of liabilities assumed considering the historical book values and projected future cash flows. The Company has conducted a preliminary assessment of liabilities arising from tax matters related to SpeeCo, and has recognized provisional amounts in its initial accounting for the acquisition for the identified tax liabilities. However, the Company is continuing its review of these matters during the measurement period, and if new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date identifies adjustments to the tax liabilities initially recognized, as well as any additional tax liabilities that existed as of the acquisition date, the acquisition accounting will be revised to reflect the resulting adjustments to the provisional tax amounts initially recognized.
The operating results of SpeeCo are included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements from the acquisition date forward. Included in operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are non-cash charges totaling $1.6 million for amortization of intangible assets and expense for the step-up to fair value of inventories related to SpeeCo. Amortization of purchase accounting adjustments for SpeeCo and previous acquisitions are expected to total $4.4 million in 2010, $6.8 million in 2011, $5.8 million in 2012, and $5.1 million in 2013.
Disposition of Gear Products
On September 30, 2010, we sold our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Gear Products to Tulsa Winch, Inc., an operating unit of Dover Industrial Products, Inc., for $24.8 million in cash. Gear Products is a manufacturer of mechanical power transmission components for OEMs, serving the utility, construction, forestry, marine, and mining markets. Under terms of the related stock purchase agreement, the parties agreed to treat the stock sale as if it were an asset sale for income tax purposes, which resulted in an increase in income tax expense recognized on the sale. Gear Products results, which are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented, are summarized below:
18
Table of Contents
Discontinued Operations | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 4,575 | | $ | 3,438 | | $ | 12,297 | | $ | 12,413 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | $ | (145 | ) | $ | 538 | | $ | 1,023 | | $ | 1,377 | |
Gain on sale of subsidiary | | 11,941 | | — | | 11,941 | | — | |
Income before income taxes | | 11,796 | | 538 | | 12,964 | | 1,377 | |
Income tax provision | | 6,743 | | 196 | | 7,171 | | 496 | |
Income from discontinued operations | | $ | 5,053 | | $ | 342 | | $ | 5,793 | | $ | 881 | |
Operating Results
Three months ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited) compared to three months ended September 30, 2009 (unaudited).
The table below provides a summary of results and the primary contributing factors to the year-over-year change.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | | | |
(Amounts in millions) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | Change | | | | Contributing Factor | |
(Amounts may not sum due to rounding) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 162.6 | | $ | 126.9 | | $ | 35.7 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ | 37.1 | | Sales volume | |
| | | | | | | | — | | Selling price and mix | |
| | | | | | | | (1.4 | ) | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | 50.4 | | 43.8 | | 6.6 | | | | | |
Gross margin | | 31.0 | % | 34.5 | % | | | 13.8 | | Sales volume | |
| | | | | | | | — | | Selling price and mix | |
| | | | | | | | (1.2 | ) | Product cost and mix | |
| | | | | | | | (1.6 | ) | SpeeCo purchase accounting | |
| | | | | | | | (1.3 | ) | Strategic initiatives | |
| | | | | | | | (3.1 | ) | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
SG&A | | 29.7 | | 23.1 | | 6.6 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 2.2 | | Compensation | |
| | | | | | | | 1.3 | | Advertising | |
| | | | | | | | 0.9 | | Strategic initiatives | |
| | | | | | | | 0.8 | | Personnel-related | |
| | | | | | | | 1.0 | | SpeeCo SG&A | |
| | | | | | | | (0.3 | ) | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | 0.7 | | Other | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | 20.7 | | 20.2 | | 0.5 | | | | | |
Operating margin | | 12.7 | % | 16.0 | % | | | 6.6 | | Increase in gross profit | |
| | | | | | | | (6.6 | ) | Increase in SG&A | |
| | | | | | | | 0.5 | | Plant closure and severance costs | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | 10.6 | | 11.0 | | (0.4 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 0.5 | | Increase in operating income | |
| | | | | | | | (1.6 | ) | Increase in interest expense | |
| | | | | | | | (7.1 | ) | Refinancing costs | |
| | | | | | | | (0.4 | ) | Other income (expense), net | |
| | | | | | | | 8.2 | | Decrease in income taxes | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations | | 5.1 | | 0.3 | | 4.7 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | (0.7 | ) | Operating results | |
| | | | | | | | 11.9 | | Gain on sale of Gear Products | |
| | | | | | | | (6.5 | ) | Income tax provision | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 15.6 | | $ | 11.3 | | $ | 4.3 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
19
Table of Contents
Sales in the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $35.7 million (28.1%) from the same period in 2009. This sales increase was primarily due to increased unit volume of $37.1 million, including incremental sales attributable to SpeeCo, which was acquired on August 10, 2010. Average selling prices and product mix were unchanged. In the third quarter of 2010, the stronger U.S. Dollar in comparison to the third quarter of 2009 reduced consolidated sales by $1.4 million. Sales of chainsaw components and accessories were up 19.8%, and concrete cutting saws and components were up 14.0% in the third quarter of 2010 compared to 2009. Outdoor equipment parts and accessories, excluding SpeeCo, increased 3.6% in the comparative quarters. International sales increased by $18.0 million (19.8%) and domestic sales increased by $3.8 million (10.7%), excluding the effects of SpeeCo. The increase in international and domestic sales reflected stronger world-wide market conditions and demand for our products compared to market conditions in the third quarter of 2009. Sales to OEM customers increased by 30.7% and replacement market sales increased by 13.6%, both excluding the effects of SpeeCo.
Consolidated order backlog at September 30, 2010 was $130.4 million compared to $121.2 million at June 30, 2010. The addition of SpeeCo accounted for $10.3 million of the backlog at September 30, 2010.
Gross profit increased $6.6 million (15.0%) from the third quarter of 2009 to the third quarter of 2010. Higher sales unit volume was partially offset by the net unfavorable effects of movement in foreign currency exchange rates. Our manufacturing costs were positively affected during the third quarter of 2010 by higher production volumes, including a lower number of idle manufacturing days, which improved absorption rates for fixed and semi-variable manufacturing costs when compared to the third quarter of 2009. Partially offsetting these efficiency gains were higher year-over-year costs for steel, purchase accounting effects related to SpeeCo, and charges related to our strategic initiatives. We estimate that year-over-year steel costs were $1.0 million higher for the comparable third quarter periods. SpeeCo purchase accounting effects related to amortization of intangible assets and expensing of the step-up to estimated fair value for inventories, included in cost of sales for the third quarter of 2010, were $1.6 million. Also recognized in cost of sales in the third quarter of 2010 were charges of $1.3 million relating to our strategic initiatives to re-align and consolidate manufacturing for certain product lines and to eliminate low volume items from our product offerings. Gross margin in the third quarter of 2010 was 31.0% of sales compared to 34.5% in the third quarter of 2009.
Fluctuations in currency exchange rates decreased our gross profit in the third quarter of 2010 compared to 2009 by $3.1 million. The translation of weaker foreign currencies into a stronger U.S. Dollar in the European economic zone resulted in lower reported sales revenue. However, the U.S. Dollar was weaker for the quarter on a year-over-year basis in relationship to the Canadian Dollar and Brazilian Real. This weakening of the U.S. Dollar in comparison to currencies of countries where we have foreign manufacturing facilities resulted in higher cost of sales for those locations. The combined net effect of these currency movements reduced our gross profit for the quarter.
SG&A was $29.7 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared to $23.1 million in the third quarter of 2009, representing an increase of $6.6 million (28.5%). As a percentage of sales, SG&A increased slightly from 18.2% in the third quarter of 2009 to 18.3% in the third quarter of 2010. Compensation expense for the quarter increased by $2.2 million on a year-over-year basis, reflecting increased staffing levels, annual merit increases implemented in the first quarter of 2010, increased incentive compensation expense driven by improved operating performance, and increased stock compensation expense from equity awards granted in March 2010 compared to no awards granted in the first nine months of 2009. We also increased our advertising expenditures by $1.3 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the third quarter of 2009 after the significant reduction implemented in 2009. Incremental expenses of $0.9 million were incurred in SG&A in the three months ended September 30, 2010 related to our strategic initiatives, including projects to improve manufacturing and supply chain efficiency. Personnel-related costs for recruitment, relocation, travel, and training were also up $0.8 million on a year-over-year basis. The addition of SpeeCo contributed $1.0 million to the year-over-year increase in SG&A. International SG&A expenses decreased, by $0.3 million from the prior year period, due to the stronger U.S. Dollar in relationship to European currencies and its effect on the translation of foreign expenses.
20
Table of Contents
We took actions during 2009 to reduce the number of employees at certain of our locations. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized a total of $0.5 million in severance charges related to this reduction in force. These actions were not repeated in the comparative third quarter of 2010.
Operating income increased by $0.5 million from the third quarter of 2009 to the third quarter of 2010, resulting in an operating margin for 2010 of 12.7% of sales compared to 16.0% for the third quarter of 2009.
Interest expense was $7.7 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared to $6.2 million in the third quarter of 2009. The increase was primarily due to higher average outstanding debt balances in the comparable periods. During the third quarter of 2010, we amended and restated our senior credit facilities and redeemed our 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes. During the mandatory redemption waiting period, we continued to incur interest on the outstanding 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes after we had borrowed the funds under the new credit facilities with which to pay off these notes. In addition, we increased our borrowings in the third quarter to fund a portion of the acquisition of SpeeCo in August, 2010.
Other income (expense), net in the third quarter of 2010 included charges of $7.1 million related to the refinancing of our debt. These charges included the write-off of previously deferred financing costs totaling $3.5 million from the early extinguishment of debt, as well as $3.6 million in new costs associated with these transactions. In the third quarter of 2009, other income (expense), net reflected a gain of $0.4 million related to an insurance reimbursement.
The following table summarizes our income tax provision for continuing operations in 2010 and 2009:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | | $ | 5,803 | | $ | 14,491 | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (4,757 | ) | 3,491 | |
Effective tax rate | | (82.0 | )% | 24.1 | % |
| | | | | | | |
The income tax benefit recognized in the third quarter of 2010 reflects the release of the net amount of $5.9 million in previously provided income tax expense on uncertain tax positions. Excluding the effect of this release, the effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2010 would have been 19.1 %. The effective tax rate was further reduced from the federal statutory rate in the third quarter of 2010 by increased estimated tax credits for research and experimentation and by the impact of lower taxes on our foreign operations, partially offset by state income taxes.
The effective tax rate in the three months ended September 30, 2009 was reduced from the federal statutory rate by the impact of lower taxes on our foreign operations and the positive effect from finalization of our advanced pricing agreement (“APA”) with Canada and the U.S. Finalization of the APA resulted in the recognition of interest on refunds from prior years. Additionally, our effective tax rate in 2009 was reduced by federal and state tax credits. Taxes on our foreign operations are lower than in the U.S. because of lower statutory tax rates and increased deductions for tax purposes in foreign jurisdictions that are not recognized as expenses for book purposes. Partially offsetting these foreign tax rate reductions in both periods were additional tax expenses recognized on interest and dividends repatriated from certain of our foreign locations.
Income from continuing operations in the third quarter of 2010 was $10.6 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, compared to $11.0 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2009.
Operating Results by Segment. The Company identifies operating segments primarily based on organizational structure and the evaluation of the Chief Operating Decision Maker (Chief Executive Officer). The Company has one reportable segment: Outdoor Products. The Outdoor Products segment is a global manufacturer and marketer of saw chain and guide bars for chainsaws, and replacement parts, equipment, and accessories for the forestry, lawn and garden, farm and ranch, and construction industries. The Company reports centralized administrative functions, gain or loss on sale of land and buildings, plant closure costs, and severance costs in the Other category. The results of Gear Products were previously reported within the Other category but are now reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
21
Table of Contents
The following table reflects operating results by segment:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | Percent Change | |
Operating income: | | | | | | | |
Outdoor Products segment | | $ | 26,985 | | $ | 25,506 | | 5.8 | % |
Other | | (6,280 | ) | (5,259 | ) | (19.4 | ) |
Operating income | | $ | 20,705 | | $ | 20,247 | | 2.3 | % |
Outdoor Products Segment. The discussion above concerning sales, gross profit, and SG&A expenses is applicable to the Company’s Outdoor Products segment.
Other. Net expenses in the Other category increased by $1.0 million for the comparable period, primarily due to higher compensation expense reflecting increased staffing levels, annual merit increases implemented in the first quarter of 2010, increased incentive compensation expense driven by improved operating performance, and increased stock compensation expense from equity awards granted in March 2010 compared to no awards granted in the first nine months of 2009. Partially offsetting these increases was the effect of severance costs incurred in the third quarter of 2009, which were not repeated in the third quarter of 2010.
22
Table of Contents
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited) compared to nine months ended September 30, 2009 (unaudited).
The table below provides a summary of results and the primary contributing factors to the year-over-year change:
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | | | | |
(Amounts in millions) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | Change | | | | Contributing Factor | |
(Amounts may not sum due to rounding) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 440.5 | | $ | 348.5 | | $ | 92.0 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ | 94.3 | | Sales volume | |
| | | | | | | | (3.0 | ) | Selling price and mix | |
| | | | | | | | 0.8 | | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | 150.6 | | 114.0 | | 36.6 | | | | | |
Gross margin | | 34.2 | % | 32.7 | % | | | 34.4 | | Sales volume | |
| | | | | | | | (3.0 | ) | Selling price and mix | |
| | | | | | | | 14.5 | | Product cost and mix | |
| | | | | | | | (1.6 | ) | SpeeCo purchase accounting | |
| | | | | | | | (2.3 | ) | Strategic initiatives | |
| | | | | | | | (5.4 | ) | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
SG&A | | 86.6 | | 70.9 | | 15.7 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 7.3 | | Compensation | |
| | | | | | | | 2.3 | | Advertising | |
| | | | | | | | 2.1 | | Strategic initiatives | |
| | | | | | | | 2.1 | | Personnel-related | |
| | | | | | | | 1.0 | | SpeeCo SG&A | |
| | | | | | | | 0.8 | | Foreign currency translation | |
| | | | | | | | 0.1 | | Other | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | 64.0 | | 38.9 | | 25.1 | | | | | |
Operating margin | | 14.5 | % | 11.2 | % | | | 36.6 | | Increase in gross profit | |
| | | | | | | | (15.7 | ) | Increase in SG&A | |
| | | | | | | | (2.7 | ) | Gain on sale of land & building | |
| | | | | | | | 6.9 | | Plant closure and severance costs | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | 29.0 | | 15.7 | | 13.4 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 25.1 | | Increase in operating income | |
| | | | | | | | (2.1 | ) | Increase in interest expense | |
| | | | | | | | (7.1 | ) | Refinancing costs | |
| | | | | | | | (0.7 | ) | Other income (expense), net | |
| | | | | | | | (1.8 | ) | Income tax provision | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations | | 5.8 | | 0.9 | | 4.9 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | (0.4 | ) | Decrease in operating results | |
| | | | | | | | 11.9 | | Gain on sale of Gear Products | |
| | | | | | | | (6.7 | ) | Income tax provision | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 34.8 | | $ | 16.5 | | $ | 18.3 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $92.0 million (26.4%) from the same period in 2009. This sales increase was primarily due to increased unit volume of $94.3 million, including incremental sales attributable to SpeeCo, which was acquired on August 10, 2010. This volume-related increase reflected improved market conditions and demand for our products, especially in international markets, after the weak market conditions we experienced in 2009 during the global recession. The volume increase was partially offset by a decrease in average unit selling prices and product mix of $3.0 million. The translation of foreign currency-denominated sales transactions, given the slightly weaker U.S. Dollar in comparison to the first nine months of 2009, increased sales by $0.8 million in the comparative 2010 period. International sales increased by $72.2 million (30.4%) and domestic sales increased by $6.0 million (5.4%), exclusive of the effects of SpeeCo. Sales of chainsaw components and accessories increased by 25.9% and sales of concrete-cutting saws and components increased by 20.1% in the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009. Excluding the effects of SpeeCo, sales of outdoor care parts and accessories increased by 7.1% from 2009 to 2010. Sales to OEMs increased by 31.2%, while replacement market sales increased by 19.9%, both exclusive of SpeeCo sales.
23
Table of Contents
Consolidated order backlog at September 30, 2010 was $130.4 million compared to $78.1 million at December 31, 2009. SpeeCo accounted for $10.3 million of the consolidated backlog at September 30, 2010.
Gross profit increased $36.6 million (32.1%) from the first nine months of 2009 to the first nine months of 2010. Higher sales unit volume and improvements in product cost and mix were partially offset by lower average unit selling prices and the net unfavorable effects of movement in foreign currency exchange rates. Our manufacturing costs were positively affected during the first nine months of 2010 by higher production volumes, including a lower number of idle manufacturing days, which improved absorption rates for fixed and semi-variable manufacturing costs when compared to the first nine months of 2009. On a year-to-date comparative basis, steel costs were lower in 2010 by $4.9 million compared to 2009 but this trend reversed in the third quarter of 2010, and we expect to incur higher steel costs for the balance of 2010. Offsetting these efficiency and steel cost gains were the purchase accounting effects related to SpeeCo and charges related to our strategic initiatives. Purchase accounting effects attributable to SpeeCo included in cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $1.6 million. Also recognized in cost of sales in the first nine months of 2010 were charges of $2.3 million relating to our strategic initiatives to re-align and consolidate manufacturing for certain product lines and to eliminate low volume items from our product offerings. Year-to-date gross margin in 2010 was 34.2% of sales compared to 32.7% for the comparable nine months of 2009.
Fluctuations in currency exchange rates decreased our gross profit in the first nine months of 2010 compared to 2009 by $5.4 million. The translation of slightly stronger average foreign currencies into a weaker U.S. Dollar resulted in higher reported sales revenue. However, the U.S. Dollar was weaker in the period on a year-over-year basis in relationship to the Canadian Dollar and Brazilian Real. This weakening of the U.S. Dollar in comparison to currencies of countries where we have foreign manufacturing facilities resulted in higher cost of sales for those locations. The combined effects of these currency movements reduced our gross profit for the first nine months of 2010.
SG&A was $86.6 million in the first nine months of 2010, compared to $70.9 million in the first nine months of 2009, representing an increase of $15.7 million (22.2%). As a percentage of sales, SG&A decreased from 20.3% in the first nine months of 2009 to 19.7% in the first nine months of 2010, as our sales increased at a faster rate than our SG&A costs. Year-to-date compensation expense increased by $7.3 million on a year-over-year basis, reflecting increases in staffing levels, annual merit increases implemented in the first quarter of 2010, increased incentive compensation expense driven by improved operating performance, and increased stock compensation expense from equity awards granted in March 2010 compared to no awards granted in the first nine months of 2009. We increased our advertising expenditures by $2.3 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009 after the significant reduction implemented during 2009. During the first three quarters of 2010, expenses of $2.1 million were incurred in SG&A related to our strategic initiatives, including projects to improve manufacturing and supply chain efficiency, as well as our acquisition program. Personnel-related costs for recruitment, relocation, travel, and training were also up $2.1 million on a year-over-year basis. The addition of SpeeCo in August 2010 contributed $1.0 million to the year-over-year increase in SG&A. International operating expenses increased by $0.8 million from the prior year period due to the weaker U.S. Dollar in relationship to foreign currencies and its effect on the translation of foreign expenses.
On June 25, 2009, we sold the land and building representing our former European headquarters and distribution center. These operations have moved to new, nearby leased facilities. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $2.7 million on the sale.
In January 2009, we announced our intent to close our manufacturing facility in Milan, Tennessee, during the second quarter of 2009. Products previously manufactured in that facility are now produced in our other manufacturing facilities. During the first nine months of 2009, we recognized a total of $3.8 million in charges related to the closure of this manufacturing plant, consisting of $2.0 million in asset impairment charges, $1.0 million in employee severance and benefit costs and $0.8 million in other expenses. Of these charges, $0.3 million were recognized in cost of goods sold on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The land and building are currently being marketed for sale and are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2010.
24
Table of Contents
We took actions during 2009 to reduce the number of employees at certain of our other locations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized a total of $3.4 million in severance charges related to this reduction in force.
Operating income increased by $25.1 million from the first nine months of 2009 to the first nine months of 2010, resulting in an operating margin for 2010 of 14.5% of sales compared to 11.2% for the first nine months of 2009.
Interest expense was $20.6 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared to $18.5 million in the first nine months of 2009. The increase was primarily due to higher average outstanding debt balances in the comparable periods. During the third quarter of 2010, we amended and restated our senior credit facilities and redeemed our 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes. During the mandatory redemption waiting period, we continued to incur interest on the outstanding 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes after we had borrowed the funds under the new credit facilities with which to pay off the notes. In addition, we increased our borrowings to fund a portion of the acquisition cost of SpeeCo in August, 2010.
Other income (expense), net in the first nine months of 2010 included charges of $7.1 million related to the refinancing of our debt. These charges included the write-off of previously deferred financing costs totaling $3.5 million from the early extinguishment of debt, as well as $3.6 million in new costs associated with these transactions. In the first nine months of 2009, other income (expense), net reflected a gain of $0.4 million related to an insurance reimbursement.
The following table summarizes our income tax provision for continuing operations in 2010 and 2009:
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | | $ | 36,252 | | $ | 21,028 | |
Provision for income taxes | | 7,207 | | 5,378 | |
Effective tax rate | | 19.9 | % | 25.6 | % |
| | | | | | | |
The income tax provision recognized in the first nine months of 2010 reflects the release of a net amount of $5.9 million in previously provided income tax expense on uncertain tax positions. Excluding the effect of this release, the effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2010 would have been 36.1%. The 2010 year-to-date effective tax rate also differs from the federal statutory rate due to increased estimated tax credits for research and experimentation, positive effects from settlement of our IRS audit, and the impact of lower taxes on our foreign operations. These reductions were partially offset by the $1.7 million impact of the change in tax deductibility related to the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit we provide to certain of our U.S. retirees as well as state income taxes.
The Company sponsors various post-employment retiree medical benefit plans for certain employees in the U.S. The Company receives a Medicare Part D subsidy for a portion of the cost of providing prescription drug benefits under its retiree medical benefit plan. In March of 2010, new legislation was signed into law in the U.S. that makes this subsidy fully subject to federal income tax beginning in 2013. Previously, this subsidy was essentially exempt from federal income tax. Accordingly, the Company recognized a charge of $1.7 million to income tax expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, reflecting the write-off of the deferred tax asset related to this subsidy.
The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2009 was reduced from the federal statutory rate by the impact of lower taxes on our foreign operations and the positive effect from finalization of our APA with Canada and the U.S. Finalization of the APA resulted in the recognition of interest on refunds from prior years. Additionally, our effective tax rate in 2009 was reduced by federal and state tax credits. Taxes on our foreign operations are lower than in the U.S. because of lower statutory tax rates and increased deductions for tax purposes in foreign jurisdictions that are not recognized as expenses for book purposes. Partially offsetting these tax rate reductions were additional tax expenses recognized on interest and dividends repatriated from certain of our foreign locations.
25
Table of Contents
Income from continuing operations in the first nine months of 2010 was $29.0 million, or $0.60 per diluted share, compared to $15.7 million, or $0.32 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2009.
Operating Results by Segment. The following table reflects operating results by segment:
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | | Percent Change | |
Operating income: | | | | | | | |
Outdoor Products segment | | $ | 82,952 | | $ | 56,020 | | 48.1 | % |
Other | | (18,914 | ) | (17,072 | ) | 10.8 | |
Operating income | | $ | 64,038 | | $ | 38,948 | | 64.4 | % |
Outdoor Products Segment. The discussion above concerning sales, gross profit, and SG&A expenses is applicable to the Company’s Outdoor Products segment.
Other. Net expenses in the other category increased by $1.8 million for the comparable period, primarily due to higher compensation expense reflecting increased staffing levels, annual merit increases implemented in the first quarter of 2010, increased incentive compensation expense driven by improved operating performance, and increased stock compensation expense from equity awards granted in March 2010 compared to no awards granted in the first nine months of 2009. In addition, the gain on sale of our land and building in Belgium, which occurred in the first nine months of 2009, was not repeated in 2010. Partially offsetting these increases from 2009 to 2010 was the non-recurrence of plant closure and severance costs incurred in 2009.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Revolving credit facility | | $ | 24,700 | | $ | 3,400 | |
Term loan A | | 75,000 | | — | |
Term loan B | | 275,000 | | 107,465 | |
8 7/8% senior subordinated notes | | — | | 175,000 | |
Total debt | | 374,700 | | 285,865 | |
Less current maturities | | (7,687 | ) | (5,013 | ) |
Long-term debt | | $ | 367,013 | | $ | 280,852 | |
Weighted average interest rate on outstanding debt | | | 5.17 | % | | 7.54 | % |
Senior Credit Facilities. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Blount, Inc., first entered into a credit agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation as agent on May 15, 2003. The agreement has been amended and restated on several occasions, most recently on August 9, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, the senior credit facilities consist of a revolving credit facility, a term loan A, and a term loan B.
April 2009 Amendment to Revolving Credit Facility. On April 30, 2009, we entered into an amendment to the revolving credit facility that extended the maturity date to August 9, 2010, reduced the availability to $90.0 million, and increased the interest rate and commitment fees. This amendment did not affect the term loan B facility in place at that time. The Company incurred fees and third party costs of $2.0 million related to this amendment.
December 2009 Amendment and Restatement of Senior Credit Facilities. On December 4, 2009, the senior credit facility was amended and restated to extend the maturity date for both the revolving credit facility and the term loan B facility to February 9, 2012, reduce the availability under the revolving credit facility to $60.0 million, increase the interest rate on the term loan B, and modify certain financial covenants. The Company incurred fees and third party costs of $3.3 million related to this amendment and restatement. Existing term loans representing $3.9 million of the total of $107.5 million term loan principal outstanding at the time were not affected by this amendment and restatement, and the terms for this portion of the term loans remained unchanged, including interest at the prime rate and a maturity date of August 9, 2010. The principal amount of these unchanged term loans was included in current maturities of long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009, and was paid in full on August 9, 2010.
26
Table of Contents
August 2010 Amendment and Restatement of Senior Credit Facilities. On August 9, 2010, the Company entered into an amendment and restatement of its senior credit facilities that included the following terms:
· Maximum borrowings under the revolving credit facility were increased to $75.0 million and the maturity date was extended to August 2015.
· The term loan B facility was increased to $275.0 million and the maturity date was extended to August 2016.
· The interest rates on the revolving credit facility and the term loan B facility were changed, as described below.
· A term loan A facility was established at $75.0 million and with a maturity date of August 2015.
· Certain financial and other covenants were amended and revised.
· The Company paid $6.9 million in fees and transaction costs in connection with these transactions.
The Company used the $350.0 million combined proceeds of the term loans and repaid the principal outstanding under its previous term loan B facility and its 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes originally due August 1, 2012, following the expiration of the required redemption notification period. These 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes were redeemed in full on September 16, 2010. In conjunction with the redemption of the 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes, and the repayment of principal on the previous term loan B, the Company expensed $3.5 million in unamortized deferred financing costs.
The revolving credit facility provides for total available borrowings up to $75.0 million, reduced by outstanding letters of credit and further restricted by a specific leverage ratio. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had the ability to borrow an additional $47.0 million under the terms of the revolving credit agreement. On October 1, 2010, we applied the proceeds from the sale of Gear Products to the outstanding principal on the revolving credit facility and availability under the revolving credit facility was increased to approximately $72 million. The revolving credit facility bears interest at the LIBOR Rate plus 3.50%, or the Index Rate plus 2.50%, and matures on August 9, 2015. Interest is payable on the individual maturity dates for each LIBOR-based borrowing and monthly on Index Rate-based borrowings. Any outstanding principal is due in its entirety on the maturity date.
The term loan A bears interest at the LIBOR Rate plus 3.50% or the Index Rate plus 2.50% and matures on August 9, 2015. The term loan A facility requires quarterly principal payments of $1.9 million commencing on January 1, 2011, with a final payment of $39.4 million due on the maturity date. Once repaid, principal under the term loan A facility may not be re-borrowed.
The term loan B bears interest at the LIBOR Rate plus 4.00% or the Index Rate plus 3.00% and matures on August 9, 2016. The term loan B facility requires quarterly principal payments of $0.7 million commencing on January 1, 2011, with a final payment of $259.2 million due on the maturity date. Once repaid, principal under the term loan B facility may not be re-borrowed.
The amended and restated senior credit facilities contain financial covenants relating to:
· Maximum capital expenditures of $42.5 million per calendar year.
· Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.15, defined as EBITDA divided by cash payments for interest, taxes, capital expenditures, scheduled debt principal payments, and certain other items, calculated on a trailing twelve-month basis.
· Maximum leverage ratio of 4.25, defined as total debt divided by EBITDA, calculated on a trailing twelve-month basis.
27
Table of Contents
Year-to-date capital expenditures were $14.0 million through September 30, 2010. The status of the other financial covenants was as follows:
| | As of September 30, 2010 | |
Financial Covenants | | Requirement | | Actual | |
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio last 12 months | | > 1.15 | | 2.06 | |
Maximum leverage ratio last 12 months | | < 4.25 | | 3.06 | |
In addition, there are covenants or restrictions relating to, among other categories, acquisitions, investments, loans and advances, indebtedness, dividends on our stock, and the sale of stock or assets. We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of September 30, 2010. Non-compliance with these covenants, if it were to become an event of default under the terms of the credit agreement, could result in severe limitations to our overall liquidity, and the term loan lenders could require immediate repayment of outstanding amounts, potentially requiring sale of our assets. Our debt is not subject to any triggers that would require early payment due to any adverse change in our credit rating.
The amended and restated senior credit facilities may be prepaid at any time. There can also be additional mandatory repayment requirements related to the sale of Company assets, the issuance of stock under certain circumstances, or upon the Company’s annual generation of excess cash flow, as determined under the credit agreement.
Blount International, Inc. and all of its domestic subsidiaries other than Blount, Inc. guarantee Blount, Inc.’s obligations under the senior credit facilities. The obligations under the senior credit facilities are collateralized by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of Blount, Inc. and its domestic subsidiaries, as well as a pledge of all of Blount, Inc.’s capital stock held by Blount International, Inc. and all of the stock of domestic subsidiaries held by Blount, Inc. Blount, Inc. has also pledged 65% of the stock of its non-domestic subsidiaries as additional collateral.
Our debt instruments and general credit are rated by both Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, in conjunction with the amendment and restatement of our senior credit facility and the elimination of our senior subordinated debt, the ratings on the senior credit facility were lowered by Standard & Poor’s from BB+ to BB- and by Moody’s from Ba1 to Ba3. As of September 30, 2010, the credit ratings for the Company were as follows:
| | Standard & Poor’s | | Moody’s | |
Senior credit facility | | BB- | | Ba3 | |
General credit rating | | BB- /Stable | | Ba3 | |
We intend to fund working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, and obligations under our post-employment benefit plans for the next twelve months through cash on hand, cash flows generated from operations and the amounts available under our revolving credit facility. We expect our financial resources will be sufficient to cover any additional increases in working capital, acquisitions, and capital expenditures. There can be no assurance, however, that these resources will be sufficient to meet our needs. We may also consider other options available to us in connection with future liquidity needs, including, but not limited to, the postponement of discretionary contributions to post-employment benefit plans, the postponement of capital expenditures, restructuring of our credit facilities, and issuance of new debt or equity securities.
Our interest expense may vary in the future because the interest rates on the revolving credit facility and term loans are variable. We are required under the terms of the August 9, 2010 amendment and restatement of our credit facilities to hedge 35% of the combined term loan principal outstanding with fixed or maximum interest rate derivatives. Management is currently evaluating alternatives for this interest rate hedging program. Our weighted average interest rate on all debt was 5.17% as of September 30, 2010, compared to 7.54% as of December 31, 2009.
Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2010 were $91.0 million, compared to $55.1 million at December 31, 2009. As of September 30, 2010, the proceeds of approximately $25 million from the sale of Gear Products were included in our domestic cash balance. On October 1, 2010, $24.7 million of this cash was applied to the balance outstanding under our revolving credit facility. The majority of our remaining cash balance was held at our foreign operations as of September 30, 2010.
28
Table of Contents
Cash provided by operating activities is summarized in the following table:
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Net income | | $ | 34,838 | | $ | 16,531 | |
Non-cash items | | 23,938 | | 17,465 | |
Subtotal | | 58,776 | | 33,996 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net | | (27,184 | ) | (7,915 | ) |
Discontinued operations, net | | 1,106 | | 2,774 | |
Cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 32,698 | | $ | 28,855 | |
Non-cash items consist of expenses for depreciation of property, plant, and equipment; amortization of intangible assets and other non-cash purchase accounting effects; stock compensation and other non-cash charges; asset impairment charges; the tax benefit or expense from share-based compensation; deferred income taxes; gains or losses on disposal of assets; and expenses related to financing activities.
During the first nine months of 2010, operating activities provided $32.7 million of cash. Income from continuing operations plus non-cash items totaled $58.8 million in the first nine months of 2010, reflecting increased income and non-cash items compared with the first nine months of 2009. The increased amount of non-cash items in 2010 is primarily due to the gain on the sale of Gear Products, costs associated with our refinancing activities, higher levels of depreciation of property, plant, and equipment, increased stock compensation expenses, lower asset impairment charges, fluctuations in deferred income taxes, and the non-recurring gain on the sale of land and building recognized in 2009. The net change in working capital components and other assets and liabilities during the first nine months of 2010 used $27.2 million in cash. An increase in accounts receivable of $4.8 million, reflecting increased sales levels in the third quarter of 2010, an increase of $9.3 million in inventories to support higher shipment levels, a decrease in accounts payable of $2.2 million, and a decrease in other liabilities of $30.6 million, all used cash during the period. These uses were partially offset by a decrease in other assets of $14.9 million, including the collection of income taxes receivable in certain jurisdictions, and an increase in accrued expenses of $4.8 million.
Discontinued operations provided $1.1 million in cash during the first nine months of 2010 as cash was generated by Gear Products prior to the disposition on September 30, 2010. Cash payments during the first nine months of 2010 also included $24.1 million for interest, $9.1 million for income taxes, and a cash contribution to the U.S. pension plan of $10.0 million. The Company expects to contribute a total of $15 million to $17 million to its defined benefit pension plans during 2010.
During the first nine months of 2009, operating activities provided $28.9 million of cash. Income from continuing operations, plus non-cash items, totaled $34.0 million in the first nine months of 2009. Included within non-cash items is the $2.7 million gain on sale of our land and building in Belgium. The net change in working capital components and other assets and liabilities during the period used $7.9 million in cash flow from operating activities. Decreases in accounts receivable of $3.6 million, inventories of $9.7 million, and other assets of $0.7 million all positively affected cash flows from operating activities. These positive effects were offset by reductions in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $16.2 million and a reduction in other liabilities of $5.8 million. Discontinued operations provided $2.8 million in cash during the first nine months of 2009, reflecting the positive cash flow generated by the operations of Gear Products. Cash payments during the first nine months of 2009 also included $19.7 million for interest, $9.9 million for income taxes, and a $10 million cash contribution to our U.S. defined benefit pension plan.
29
Table of Contents
Cash used in investing activities is summarized as follows:
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment | | $ | (14,017 | ) | $ | (12,737 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of assets | | 126 | | 3,282 | |
Acquisition of SpeeCo | | (90,854 | ) | — | |
Discontinued operations | | 25,176 | | (332 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | $ | (79,569 | ) | $ | (9,787 | ) |
In August 2010 we paid net cash of $90.9 million to acquire SpeeCo, exclusive of transaction expenses. On September 30, 2010 we sold Gear Products and received initial cash proceeds of $25.2 million, based on a preliminary purchase price. We expect the cash proceeds from the sale of Gear Products to be $24.8 million after settlement of the final purchase price. Purchases of property, plant, and equipment are primarily for productivity improvements, expanded manufacturing capacity, and replacement of consumable tooling and equipment. Generally, about one-third of our capital spending represents replacement of consumable tooling, dies and existing equipment, with the remainder devoted to capacity and productivity improvements. During 2010, we expect to invest $19 million to $22 million for capital expenditures, compared to $17.3 million for the full year in 2009.
Cash used in financing activities is summarized as follows:
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(Amounts in thousands) | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Net change in principal under revolving credit facility | | $ | 21,300 | | $ | (3,250 | ) |
Proceeds from term loan A and term loan B | | 350,000 | | — | |
Repayment of term loan principal | | (107,465 | ) | (12,026 | ) |
Repayment of 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes | | (175,000 | ) | — | |
Issuance costs related to debt | | (6,863 | ) | (1,900 | ) |
Proceeds and tax effects of stock-based compensation | | 1,333 | | (165 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | $ | 83,305 | | $ | (17,341 | ) |
On August 9, 2010 we amended and restated our senior credit facilities, increasing the available borrowings, extending the maturity dates, and modifying the interest rates and financial covenants. We borrowed $350.0 million under two new term loan instruments, and used the majority of the proceeds to repay our existing term loan and 8 7/8% senior subordinated notes. We also borrowed additional funds to acquire SpeeCo on August 10, 2010. We incurred fees and costs of $6.9 million for these financing transactions. Cash used in financing activities in the first nine months of 2009 included $15.3 million in net repayments of principal on our revolving credit and term debt facilities. We also incurred $1.9 million in costs to amend and extend the maturity date of our revolving credit facility in April 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In the opinion of management, there are currently no recent accounting pronouncements to be adopted that are expected to have a significant effect on our financial reporting.
30
Table of Contents
Forward Looking Statements
“Forward looking statements,” as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, used in this report, including without limitation our “outlook,” “guidance,” “expectations,” “beliefs,” “plans,” “indications,” “estimates,” “anticipations,” and their variants, are based upon available information and upon assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable; however, these forward looking statements involve certain risks and should not be considered indicative of actual results that the Company may achieve in the future. Specifically, issues concerning availability and estimated costs of financing, the global economic climate, foreign currency exchange rates, the cost to the Company of commodities in general, and of steel in particular, the anticipated level of applicable interest rates, and the anticipated effects of discontinued operations involve certain estimates and assumptions. To the extent that these, or any other such assumptions, are not realized going forward, or other unforeseen factors arise, actual results for the periods subsequent to the date of this report may differ materially.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risks from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices, including raw materials such as steel. We manage our exposure to these market risks through our regular operating and financing activities, and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivatives. When utilized, derivatives are used as risk management tools and not for trading or speculative purposes.
We manage our ratio of fixed to variable rate debt with the objective of achieving a mix that management believes is appropriate. The interest rates are variable on our term and revolver loans and we are subject to market risk from movement in benchmark rates. We are required under the terms of the August 9, 2010 amendment and restatement of our credit facilities to hedge 35% of the combined term loan principal outstanding with fixed or maximum interest rate derivatives. Management is currently evaluating alternatives for this interest rate hedging program.
See also, the Market Risk section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our most recent Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 9, 2010, for further discussion of market risk.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) respectively, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
31
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits:
**10.1 Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Tulsa Winch, Inc., Blount, Inc. and Dover Industrial Products, Inc. dated September 30, 2010.
**31.1 Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Joshua L. Collins, President and Chief Executive Officer.
**31.2 Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Calvin E. Jenness, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
**32.1 Certification pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Joshua L. Collins, President and Chief Executive Officer.
**32.2 Certification pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Calvin E. Jenness, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
** Filed electronically herewith. Copies of such exhibits may be obtained upon written request from:
| Blount International, Inc. |
| P.O. Box 22127 |
| Portland, Oregon 97269-2127 |
32
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.
BLOUNT INTERNATIONAL, INC. | | |
Registrant | | |
| |
| |
/s/ Calvin E. Jenness | | /s/ Mark V. Allred |
Calvin E. Jenness | | Mark V. Allred |
Senior Vice President and | | Vice President and Corporate Controller |
Chief Financial Officer | | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
(Principal Financial Officer) | | |
| | |
| | |
Dated: November 9, 2010 | | |
| | | |
33